More on the Hot Air acquisition

posted at 4:37 pm on February 18, 2010 by Allahpundit

Ed’s written about it and Michelle’s planning to write about it so I’d feel odd if I didn’t write something myself. Frankly, I don’t have much to add to what Ed said earlier, although he did leave out the part during negotiations where Salem demanded that I stop writing about polls, Palin, and atheism and I reminded them that that’s, like, 97 percent of my content. (I’m joking. Or am I?)

He’s right, of course, that this was unsettling at first, partly because of the speed with which the deal came together and partly because we were uneasy about moving from what was, in essence, a family business to a corporation. But, all idle flattery aside, when we flew out to Colorado and met with the Salem team, they couldn’t have been friendlier or more accommodating. The gist of it is that they like the site pretty much as is and believe they can do a better job of promoting it and monetizing its ad potential than Michelle could. Which is certainly true: Whereas MM had to pay third parties to handle advertising and tech infrastructure, Salem already has experienced people in house to deal with that. They also have many more servers on which to host the site, which, as our regulars know, became a major issue on the night of Scott Brown’s election when the traffic load caused us to melt down. With the midterms coming up and traffic expected to keep popping, the need for more server space to keep the site online would have driven overhead up dramatically. That’s not a major problem for a corporation, which enjoys economy of scale, but for a very small business, it’s a dilemma.

Long story short, the biggest change to the site that you’ll likely see is uninterrupted service on very high-traffic days. Beyond that, things should look familiar: Same Ed and AP, same URL, same basic design (although some tweaks, especially to manage ad space, should be expected). As Ed mentioned earlier, to our great relief, there’s been no attempt to limit what we can or can’t write about. Which means, quite simply, that there are no great downsides to this transaction. Or rather, almost no downsides.

The difficult part of this is having to part ways with Michelle. Superficially, it’s no big deal: She rarely posted to the site and was content to let Ed and me run things here as we saw fit. But Hot Air was, as I say, essentially a family business, and the family has now split up. After the deal, I joked with MM that I felt like a kid whose mom had just dropped him off at the orphanage — a really nice orphanage, to be sure, but still. Cliched though it may be, I do remember like it was yesterday meeting with her and her husband in 2005 to brainstorm about the new site, hearing them describe how Michelle wanted to do daily vlogs called “Vents”, how they were thinking of a two-column format to help promote popular posts, how they needed a name for the site that would reflect its emphasis on video — something with “Air,” perhaps. And now, somehow, I’m the only original contributor left. It’s not lost on me, nor will it ever be, that she could have chosen many other, better bloggers to help her launch Hot Air, particularly since I’d quit blogging at my old site more than a year before she conceived the idea for HA. But she chose me, for whatever reason, and there’s no way I can ever repay her for that, even though it’s a comfort to think that Salem’s offer helped.

Ed wasn’t kidding this morning when he said we told Salem at our meeting that they have big shoes to fill in replacing Michelle. We really did tell them that. But the early signs on that front are good and I’m optimistic that they’ll remain good — which is a hard thing for a famously mopey eeyore to admit. Here’s to an exciting and profitable future for all of us.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM

Yes, it changes the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes. This also happens to ordinary people who change moods and when the camera is from a different angle. I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.

SarahW on April 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM

Yes, it changes the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes. This also happens to ordinary people who change moods and when the camera is from a different angle. I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.

SarahW on April 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM

“Nothing else would account for it”?

Uhm… howsabout the obvious deduction that the college ID photo and the mug shot are two different young men? Is that “nothing else,” or something else?

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:01 PM

Until or unless you or Akzed or someone tell me WHY, I ought to wonder, I’m not really going to worry. JFKY on April 5, 2013 at 2:05 PM

We could ask the Dark Knight Rises property manager about this, but he’s dead and buried in Newtown, CT.

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:06 PM

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM

Yes, it changes the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes. This also happens to ordinary people who change moods and when the camera is from a different angle. I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.
SarahW on April 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM

You address “the way you hold your self, your eyes, your weight, and features change when your facial musculature changes” but not eye color? Not the width of the nose?

Now I realize that you’re calling me crazy. ” I think your discrepancy detector has been warped by mental illness…” I think you are employed by those who orchestrated the Aurora massacre.

I think your denial of the obvious is warped by your involvement with the Aurora massacre hit team, frankly, because nothing else would account for it.

Akzed on April 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM

the source told the National Enquirer.

Congrats, Young.

You detective sleuthing lead you to a UK transcript swipe of a National Enquirer story, that was also swiped by the Times.

budfox on April 5, 2013 at 10:18 AM

Not wanting to get involved in the personal p@ssing match, but to me The Enquirer holds more credibility than the Slimes and a lot of media outlets. Actually, there really aren’t any “legacy” media that I’d hold above The Enquirer.

Until I hear/read differently I’d tend to believe it as I do most media info.

kim roy on April 5, 2013 at 11:35 PM

Ed is (perhaps unwittingly) offering support for the idea of warnings such as the one reportedly made by the doc here find their way into a database in place for background checks.
 
verbaluce on April 5, 2013 at 12:40 PM

 

So you support intervention-minded government databases when a medical condition poses a threat to the lives of others?
 
rogerb on April 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM

 
So the thread is dead after we point out a particular mindset and what verbaluce is readily endorsing.
 
Oopsies.

rogerb on April 6, 2013 at 7:39 AM

But I haven’t heard anyone who favors more gun control on some level suggest that there are no other issues to be addressed.
But maybe what you’re offering here is support for robust background checks.

verbaluce on April 5, 2013 at 12:28 PM

They’re real reason for wanting gun control has nothing to do with stopping these incidents. Their desire is to control our behavior because they think they know what is better for us, just like all fascist, ignorant goons.

dogsoldier on April 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM

Everyone knows that at 400 yards Palin could plink verbaluce like an outhouse rat then ponder the waste of perfectly good ammunition.

viking01 on April 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM

Worth the price of admission, right there. LOL.

Cleombrotus on April 6, 2013 at 9:26 AM

How many reports of this nature are ignored every day?
AND for good reason. The “psychiatrist” obviously did not have enough evidence. That’s typical.
This scat will become even more common as the “gun control” BS spirals out of control. Some have already blamed “anti-depressants”.
LOL
Face it, those of you who need a reason as to why he did what he did:
He’s just your run-of-the-mill psychopath seeking a legacy.
Read: “The Rage of the Random Actor” by Korem.
This guy is no more more “mentally ill” than most reading this.
~(Ä)~

Karl Magnus on April 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM

I think we need strong background checks and positive ID checks through a national database to vote. It’s for the children, you know.

Jeff2161 on April 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM

How many reports of this nature are ignored every day?
AND for good reason. The “psychiatrist” obviously did not have enough evidence. That’s typical.

Karl Magnus on April 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM

Are you serious or is this sarcasm.

While I don’t trust doctors not to sell out to the government, especially these new doctor-lites that Obamacare will usher in to contain costs, the idea that a psychiatrist’s comments of warning should go unchecked and unnoticed by police due to insufficient ‘evidence’ is preposterous — certainly so with the laws we have today mandating reporting of certain forms of homocidal ideation, and considering the legal basis for MDs’ authority to involuntarily commit.

And then, to ignore a complaint of stalking, and electronic threats and harrassment (which are especially easy to check), especially by a psychiatrist, as unworthy of any notice because of insufficient evidence is particularly ludicrous (not the rapper).

You’ve got to be kidding, right?

flicker on April 6, 2013 at 8:54 PM

A guy called a talk show in Philly to report that after telling his doc that he drinks two six-packs a night, the doc reported him to the police and he lost his driver’s license.

So I think the authorities are not bashful about reacting to the concerns of medical professionals regarding their patients’ psych problems, real or imagined. Not that I agree with them in the case I mentioned, I’m just sayin.

Of course, given the fact that the shooter’s mug shot bears no resemblance to his purported college ID photo, there are other problems with this uh, event that demand investigation.

Akzed on April 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM

Enforce the laws on the books, a brillant new idea.

JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:01 AM

On another thread, I blamed the people of Colorado for that jackass congresswoman who can’t articulate the difference between a large capcity magazine from a vibrator. I also demanded they tell us exactly how they were going to make things right.

I now blame them for all the harm the Colorado gun grabbers will do to America.

And I want them to fix it. Now.

JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:07 AM

Dr. Fenton should have told the police she knew of a gun that was going to take one of her patients on a killing spree.

JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:18 AM

Liberals should be ashamed as they tap dance in the pool of blood drawn by murdered children.

JackM on April 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3