“Rare intelligence break” led to Taliban chief’s capture

posted at 1:55 pm on February 17, 2010 by Allahpundit

Actually bad news, since it suggests more a stroke of luck than some sea change in Pakistani behavior.

U.S. and Pakistani officials said Tuesday that the capture of Baradar was driven by a rare intelligence break that enabled American spy agencies to pinpoint the Taliban military chief and help Pakistan’s intelligence service organize on short notice a daring operation to arrest him.

Officials in Washington said the capture spotlights a heightened level of cooperation that the United States has pursued aggressively in recent years through a campaign of diplomatic and military pressure. The effort involved a nearly constant stream of often secret visits by top U.S. officials, as well as more unconventional inducements. Twice over the last six months, CIA Predator drones have been used to kill the leaders of the Pakistani Taliban faction responsible for attacks in Pakistan.

But as for the arrest of Baradar, one U.S. official said: “It’s not just a matter of their motivation; it’s a matter of opportunity that we present. I don’t think it’s fair to say they decided they wanted to help us all of a sudden. We don’t get great opportunities at these guys all the time.”

A Pakistani expert on the Taliban tells WaPo he suspects Baradar’s whereabouts were “extremely well known” to ISI for a long time, which echoes Hillary’s impolitic but accurate point last year that Pakistan could go in and get Al Qaeda’s bigwigs whenever it liked. But what about that “rare intelligence break”? What’s that all about? Rusty Shackleford e-mailed last night to remind me that Newsweek had a scoop this past weekend that seemed minor-ish at the time — but maybe not so much anymore:

In late January, an Al Qaeda operative headed from Pakistan on his way to Yemen was arrested in the Persian Gulf country of Oman, a U.S. counter-terrorism official confirmed…

There has been no public announcement of the arrest. But in a possible indication of the operative’s importance, just a few days later, two postings on a jihadi web forum suggested that Al Qaeda leaders were worried and wanted their “commanders” to take immediate precautions…

Even more noteworthy, the postings -written by a fellow Al Qaeda “brother” – reported that Al Eidan had with him 300 “important phone numbers” as well as pictures, names and documents from Afghanistan…

It is difficult to assess at this stage how significant the arrest of the Al Qaeda operative may be. But Evan Kohlmann, a counter-terrorism specialist who provides analysis for U.S. government agencies and who first spotted the web postings, told Declassified: “These kind of grabs are not all that common.” “The idea that he would have personnel files on such a large cross section of Al Qaeda fighters is a remarkable gain,” said Kohlmann.

Baradar was a Taliban chief, not AQ, but given his importance in Afghanistan it may well be that Al Qaeda was in contact with him for purposes of coordination. If his (or his aides’) cell numbers were among those uncovered, U.S. intel might have been able to use them to track him to a location in Karachi and then confront Pakistan with the sort of “unconventional inducements” I speculated about last night.

One lingering question: The CIA’s actually stepped up its drone attacks in the tribal areas lately, striking three times in the last four days alone. But according to news reports at the time, that jihadi double-agent suicide bombing at the CIA’s base in Afghanistan just before New Year’s was supposed to be a crippling blow because it wiped out most of the unit responsible for locating Taliban and AQ targets. How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Thank God for luck.

Akzed on February 17, 2010 at 1:58 PM

Actually bad news, since it suggests more of a stroke of luck than some sea change in Pakistani behavior.

But it’s more than just a stroke of luck. Does anyone think the ISI would have acted on the intelligence if the Taliban hadn’t just carried out several major, coordinated suicide bomber attacks on the ISI?

It was always clear that there was no sea change due to anything from Washington. No one in the world is scared of anything from Washington – except for traditionally trustworthy American allies, which Pakistan never was.

neurosculptor on February 17, 2010 at 2:01 PM

The proverbial blind squirrel and the nut.

UltimateBob on February 17, 2010 at 2:02 PM

How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

“Air raiding villages” The O

the_nile on February 17, 2010 at 2:02 PM

Sounds like someone ratted him out, similar to how we got Zarqawi in Iraq.

Daemonocracy on February 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM

Wow, Barry ought to go to Las Vegas…….oh wait.

portlandon on February 17, 2010 at 2:05 PM

ISI forgot to redact his name from the 2010 company phone book?

Chris_Balsz on February 17, 2010 at 2:06 PM

Obooba kept him on the phone long enough so the CIA could trace the call.

Akzed on February 17, 2010 at 2:07 PM

STRATFOR suggested yesterday the arrest or finding of Baradar had a lot to do with working a deal with the Pashtun in regards to the western parts of Pakistan. It would not be such a good idea for Islamabad to be seen speaking with Baradar in the open so he was perhaps brought in for chats under the guise of being “captured”.

There are many sides to this “capture”, but all in all it looks like a CYA for both Pakistan and Obama. Both needed some sort of a win and a significant one when it comes to the Taliban.

What he tells those questioning him, and what it ends up being worth is another question. Once this went public you can bet AQ shifted or is adjusting.

It looks more political at this juncture than advantageous as far as intelligence. But that is just me.

freeus on February 17, 2010 at 2:07 PM

It isn’t luck. Just like an organized sports team makes their own luck by doing on the field the necessary things that cause the opponent to break down. Then you capitalize on the mistakes.

If you keep the pressure on, the breaks are going to come your way.

Skandia Recluse on February 17, 2010 at 2:08 PM

“Rare intelligence break…”

Is that a rare lapse of intelligence, or a fortuitous discovery of a brain?

percysunshine on February 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM

How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

Dude, it’s the CI freakin’ A. Just like in the movie “Independence Day” when the guy says, “You don’t think they actually pay $2000 for a toilet seat, do ya”.

They control everything. Well, everything the Bildebergers let them control.

SouthernGent on February 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM

Headline…

Pakis painted into corner forced to betray a brother. Now safe in art classes.

BL@KBIRD on February 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM

It’s called, “impunity”. Hillary called it right. Pakistan just lifted the curtain and we saw the Wizard for a brief moment.

Punditpawn on February 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM

Did the stimulus save or create some ISI jobs too?

search4truth on February 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM

How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

Promotions have that effect

J_Crater on February 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM

“The US ramped up the attacks after an al Qaeda suicide bomber, aided by the Haqqani Network and Pakistani Taliban leader Hakeemullah Mehsud, killed seven CIA officials, including the station chief, and a Jordanian intelligence officer.”

Wasn’t the Haqqani Network the monsters that would go into poor villages, offer ‘free health care’, then end up raping young girls and kidnapping the boys to force them to fight?

Maybe they finally pissed off enough villagers…

… and some grieving father dropped the ‘dime’ on the son of a bit%h!

Seven Percent Solution on February 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM

Y’all should read this piece from the Corner:

…there’s a better-than-even chance that the administration is trying to turn a lemon into lemonade. Its public messaging is that the capture of Baradar is a huge win in the ongoing war with the Taliban. But is the administration concealing the downsides of the capture? We hope not. And we certainly hope the administration is not crowing about capturing Baradar in Pakistan in order to distract from the difficulties it has had on the home front with the KSM trial and Mirandizing the Christmas bomber. But if the Times story is accurate, the evidence is beginning to tilt in the wrong direction.

If follows similarly skeptical reporting from an expert on the region offered yesterday.

CK MacLeod on February 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM

it suggests more a stroke of luck

I vote for a stroke of cash. Which is fine by me.

More please, faster.

rbj on February 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM

No, the convervsation went somthing like this…. IMO…

American: Hey Pak intel, do you know where this guy is???

Pak: Of course not, if so, in the interest of helping you, we’d of course go get him…

American: well, it just so happens that he is right over there…

Pak: (thinks to self) heck, if we don’t go get him now, their gonna cut our aid… dang… busted..

Romeo13 on February 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM

Does anyone think the ISI would have acted on the intelligence if the Taliban hadn’t just carried out several major, coordinated suicide bomber attacks on the ISI?

neurosculptor on February 17, 2010 at 2:01 PM

You are right in my opinion, the ISI is full of sypathizers to the Taliban and AQ, our operators have to spend a long time cultivating trust among the ISI and occasinally when it suits the ISI they may cooperate with us. For all we know Baradar was planning an operation against the ISI or Pakistan and we ended up the lesser of two evils for the moment.

fourdeucer on February 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM

I see this as a clever ploy by our government to pay off the Pakistanis. Because really, what’s our dollar going to be worth in a few years anyway?

Barack Obama, you magnificent bastard!

Notorious GOP on February 17, 2010 at 2:23 PM

How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

Because they know it is their job, they know it is war, and they are Men who don’t take setbacks easily. If this was easy, we’d use the DNC. Those wimps might get something done in a few decades.

But since it is war, and real American lives are at stake, and CIA Men and Women were snuffed by barefoot ignorant assh*les who aren’t smart enough to know when they had it good by accepting money and power from us, and decided to go to war with us, the CIA tough guys got going and stepped up to their job once again.

If you think this isn’t personal now, think again.

Subsunk

Subsunk on February 17, 2010 at 2:24 PM

Wait, so this wasn’t the result of Barack Obama’s Hope’N'Changeyness? Darn.

amerpundit on February 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM

Blind.Pig.Acorn

BobMbx on February 17, 2010 at 2:31 PM

“I’d rather be lucky than good” — Lefty Gomez

Bruno Strozek on February 17, 2010 at 2:45 PM

CK- Thanks for the links.

Whomever is in control of the Taliban forces in the Helmand Province would need the money, and more than other Taliban factions. Surely the Taliban forces that be would not be so upset Baradar had more “resources” that they would turn him in?

We have been telegraphing our moves into both Helmand and Marjah for 3 weeks. So it would make sense Baradar would need more “resources” than Taliban located elsewhere.

It could be all of this is in play, but Pakistan has always been about Pakistan and I think they picked him up because of what has been going down on their western borders. And we all know they were ticked off because we were not giving them enough credit for their actions in Afghanistan. Insert eye roll here!

If they release him next week, (or in a few months), we will know what went down, and man oh man will this backfire on President Chutes&Ladders.

freeus on February 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM

If “LUCK” equals “RESULTS” then yes, it was luck.

This was not luck, this is called the fruits of your labor.

uknowmorethanme on February 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM

luck favors the prepared.

BTW, if this issue is getting spun outta control AP, then just juxtapose the Jessica Lynch Rescue circumstances, the left’s response etc etc.

ted c on February 17, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Sounds like Hillary has some balls. And that the Pakis are holding out on us on the locations of these killers.

federale86 on February 17, 2010 at 3:08 PM

As you say, AP, “Fortune played a role.”

Yup, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

petefrt on February 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM

One lingering question: The CIA’s actually stepped up its drone attacks in the tribal areas lately, striking three times in the last four days alone. But according to news reports at the time, that jihadi double-agent suicide bombing at the CIA’s base in Afghanistan just before New Year’s was supposed to be a crippling blow because it wiped out most of the unit responsible for locating Taliban and AQ targets. How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

His muslim brothers are throwing him a bone of support, in order to help him get his poll numbers back up.

capejasmine on February 17, 2010 at 3:15 PM

If you think this isn’t personal now, think again.

Subsunk

Subsunk on February 17, 2010 at 2:24 PM

And it’s far from over. Quietly the gloves come off. And just as quietly the Taliban and Al Qaeda and their assets will reap the full weight of a p*ssed off CIA that are no longer interested in collecting intel.

Rovin on February 17, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Specifically, Baradar, it turns out, was one of Karzai’s main contacts with the Taliban for years, and he was at the center of efforts to negotiate a peace with the Taliban. Pakistan was frustrated at being excluded from the talks, so it snatched up Baradar to gain an advantage.
The Times quotes an unnamed American intelligence official: “I know that our people had been in touch with people around [Baradar] and were negotiating with him. So it doesn’t make sense why we bite the hand that is feeding us. And now the Taliban will have no reason to negotiate with us; they will not believe anything we will offer or say.” If this is true, then the capture of Baradar is not exactly what it first appeared. And if Baradar was as central to Karzai’s and America’s efforts to negotiate with the Taliban as the article suggests, then there appears to be significant costs to the capture. Perhaps it was even unhelpful to Karzai and the U.S.

(the Corner article referenced by CK MacLeod on February 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM)

The Fox news article about Obama meeting with War Cabinet also mentioned in the last 3 paragraphs that Baradar was pragmatic and someone willing to negotiate with us so why was he picked up? Could someone ask Leon Panetta a few tough questions?

journeyintothewhirlwind on February 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM

Intelligence at any level, of any kind, in this pathetic Administration is “rare.”

enoughalready on February 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM

I can’t help but wonder if this really was a US intel coup or maybe just a Paki intel leak to the US to get a desired result.

I find it interesting that he was captured just prior to possible traveling into Afghanistan. The Paki ISI assist the Taliban but don’t forget watching their own a*s is #1. A Taliban with his rank if he moved into Afghanistan and say was captured would definitely know of Paki support and because of the rank probably names and numbers or ranking Paki ISI collaborators.

In other words better to pick up a loose cannon themselves rather than risk his falling into US coalition hands. Baradar in Paki hands means
-Paki ISI control what he says
-brownie points for the capture
-he is not dead so can be either traded or cough escape/release later

I don’t trust Pakistan they are double dealing at best and working against US at worst. But who knows I am a bit biased on Pakistan so it maybe what the Paki ISI claim and this is the first time we ever gave them actionable intel to work with? Right after 9-11 AQ was gutted by what was a cooperative ISI then all the sudden when the US gen pop anger cooled and we were back to the ole double deal.

C-Low on February 17, 2010 at 4:20 PM

But if the Times story is accurate, the evidence is beginning to tilt in the wrong direction.
If follows similarly skeptical reporting from an expert on the region offered yesterday.

CK MacLeod on February 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM

Good catch CK, I have wondered about the relative quiet from the WH since this went public.

JusDreamin on February 17, 2010 at 4:36 PM

that jihadi double-agent suicide bombing at the CIA’s base in Afghanistan just before New Year’s was supposed to be a crippling blow because it wiped out most of the unit responsible for locating Taliban and AQ targets. How’d they get back up to speed so quickly in the wake of that attack?

That’s a damn good question. Could it be the agents on the ground and in the control rooms have more to do with getting it done than the titled dudes and dudettes running around in SUV convoys?

rcl on February 17, 2010 at 6:42 PM

My, how reassuring.

Cylor on February 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM