Gallup: Obama only up 2 over generic GOP candidate

posted at 11:36 am on February 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The era of Hope and Change may have given way to the era of Who’s Next?  Gallup reports that just a little over a year into his presidency, Barack Obama has not only failed to unite the country, but has almost squandered his own electability.  In their latest poll, Gallup finds Obama in a virtual tie with a generic Republican candidate, and the internals point to a much different turnout model than 2008:

Registered voters are about equally divided as to whether they would more likely vote to re-elect Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election, or vote for the Republican candidate.

These results are based on a Feb. 1-3 Gallup poll. Forty-four percent of U.S. registered voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama, 42% for the Republican candidate, and the remaining 14% are undecided or would vote for another candidate.

A year into his first term as president, Obama’s approval ratings are hovering around 50%. The 50% approval figure has been a strong predictor of an incumbent president’s re-election: presidents who averaged 50% or better from January of an election year through Election Day have all been re-elected. This includes George W. Bush, who averaged 51% in 2004, though his approval rating was 48% in Gallup’s final pre-election poll.

The influence of Obama’s personal likability appears to be influencing job approval.  The difference between that and the percentage who would vote for his re-election is six points, which is outside the margin of error.  Clearly, some people “approve” of Obama while disliking his performance enough to vote for an unnamed Republican challenger, at least at this point — and that’s something to keep in mind when looking at approval ratings in other polls, especially those based on likely voters.

That doesn’t tell the entire story, however.  Obama won office by getting a majority of independents and some Republicans to vote for him, while getting a turnout that greatly favored Democrats in 2008.  In this poll, only 31% of independents would cast a vote for Obama today, while 45% say they will vote for a Republican alternative.  That fourteen-point gap also tells a story about how turnout will go for Obama in 2012.  It may not be as dramatic as Massachusetts in their special election last month, but Obama is clearly not going to excite those new participants into the polls as he did in 2008.  If anything, it looks like opposition will drive the independent vote, and Obama supporters perhaps unmotivated to show up at all.

Which Republican do Gallup respondents see in that position?  The top five in order are Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, John McCain (?), Scott Brown, and Mike Huckabee.  Bobby Jindal and Tim Pawlenty also appear on the list, as does Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul, but 42% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents offered no name at all.  Romney, topping the list, only got 14% of respondents to name him (unprompted).  The field appears to be wide open, and voters appear to be open to a wide variety of candidates to challenge Obama for the White House — and that’s not a sign that Obama is impressing anyone with his performance thus far.

Addendum: John McCain?  He got 7%, just behind his former running mate, who got 11%.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Single term president? Precedented!

daesleeper on February 11, 2010 at 11:38 AM

Hide the decline.

portlandon on February 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM

If they had polled likely voters with a more realistic sample; the GOP candidate would be way ahead of Ogabe.

Funny, how the media is push polling desperately to show Obama in a good light, but fails even then.

Norwegian on February 11, 2010 at 11:40 AM

All right, Obama’s two points ahead of a generic GOP candidate, but how many points is he behind Sarah Palin?

Emperor Norton on February 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM

OMG……

Obama. Must. Go.

Knucklehead on February 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Racism motivates these poll numbers. It couldn’t be anything else. /sarc

Liam on February 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Addendum: John McCain? He got 7%, just behind his former running mate, who got 11%.

I cannot believe the Republicans would be that stupid as to rerun this Renaissance Dinosaur McCain again in 2012!

pilamaye on February 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM

I heard he’s down 2 to a folding chair…

and Paddy O’Funiture has got my vote.

Doorgunner on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Forty-four percent of U.S. registered voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama

Morons. Idiots. Sheeple. Socialists.

AubieJon on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM

“… Barack Obama has not only failed to unite the country, but has almost squandered his own electability.”

Maybe it is because the majority of Americans don’t want to see their country turned into a third world banana republic Marxist/Socialist dictatorship with high unemployment, and a currency used as toilet paper.

Seven Percent Solution on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM

So the R wins Indies by 14% points and loses by 2??

What is the party ID in this poll?

artist on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

To think, all I need to do is legally change my name to Generic Republican and I’m already the GOP presidential frontrunner. But you folks can just call me Gen.

ignorantapathy on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

These kind of polls are stupid. Cuz you imagine the “best possible candidate” which is the one you never get.

lorien1973 on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

This November is going to be fun. We’re all going to be sick of polls and political adds by September. Then we’ll get to see how Obama performs while dealing with a hostile congress.

I’m going to guess it will be “poorly”.

Mord on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

Morons. Idiots. Sheeple. Socialists.

AubieJon on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM

That is the dependable democrat voting bloc.

daesleeper on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

Down 14 among independents.

Which explains the hints of reconciliation (Pelosi aide, Nate Silver) — seriously, what’s left to lose at this point? They’re tanking with all crosstabs except their base. Maybe in some drunk self-delusion, they think passing this trainwreck would so ignite their base, they’d turn out in historic droves come November.

FAIL.

LastRick on February 11, 2010 at 11:46 AM

No link?

artist on February 11, 2010 at 11:46 AM

All right, Obama’s two points ahead of a generic GOP candidate, but how many points is he behind Sarah Palin?

Emperor Norton on February 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM

Well, given that she has a disapproval rating of 55% and 70% of America think she isn’t qualified, I have a feeling he’s beating her probably by 7-8%.

I’m a Palin fan, but she as a lot of work to do to improve her image.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Morons. Idiots. Sheeple. Socialists.

AubieJon on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM
That is the dependable democrat voting bloc.

daesleeper on February 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM

I was trying to avoid name-calling. :)

AubieJon on February 11, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Has a Presidential candidate ever lost all 57 states in an election?

Dusty on February 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM

I’d vote for an Irish Setter if he ran against Barry.

And really, wouldn’t we be better off if we would have inaugerated an Irish Setter on January 20, 2009?

I think so.

NoDonkey on February 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM

It may not be as dramatic as Massachusetts in their special election last month, but Obama is clearly not going to excite those new participants into the polls as he did in 2008.

The college Kiddie Krusade will have finished college, tried to find a job and tried to start paying off those school loans. How’s that hopey changey thing working out for you, Kids?

And for the high school crowd, well, Barack Obama is sooo 2008.

Wethal on February 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!

Is it racist to gloat?

OmahaConservative on February 11, 2010 at 11:50 AM

White guilt won’t be a contributing factor in 2012. That ship has sailed.

a capella on February 11, 2010 at 11:50 AM

If walks like a lame duck and quacks like a lame duck…

Bruno Strozek on February 11, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Well, given that she has a disapproval rating of 55% and 70% of America think she isn’t qualified, I have a feeling he’s beating her probably by 7-8%.

I’m a Palin fan, but she as a lot of work to do to improve her image.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM

That’s what campaigns are for. Hillary had horrible favorables before she ran for President.

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM

I don’t mean to be a wet blanket, but that list of potential GOP contenders is pretty weak, IMO. I don’t think Romney can win the nomination, and I don’t think Huckabee has a prayer in the general. Palin? We’ll see those indies flock to Obama if she is the nominee….there’s just such a negative reaction to her that I don’t see her winning, either. Jindal isn’t running, and Gingrich is, well, meh. And Scott Brown? Um, no.

So who else is there? It’s a pretty thin bench.

changer1701 on February 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Well, Romney might go all moderate on us.

Mitt Romney is the subject of a long profile by David S. Bernstein in today’s Boston Phoenix. Bernstein argues that Romney is moving back toward the center after running as a strong, anti-McCain conservative in 2008. According to Bernstein, in his forthcoming book the former Massachusetts governor will defend TARP, say climate change is for real, and argue that personal savings accounts must be a voluntary addition to Social Security, not replace the program altogether. Romney also will have to defend his Massachusetts health care plan, which is similar to the health bill pending in the Senate.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM

I’ve posted it before, but it becomes more applicable day by day:

“A riot is an ungly ting…und I tink it’s chust about time ve had vun!”

AubieJon on February 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM

How can this be????

Specially when Biden calls “Iraq one of Obama administration’s crowning achievements.” ?????

Just heard this on the news…and dropped my jaw.

Way to go Joe!….Ed, we’re gonna need an O’Bidenaturism soon.

Rovin on February 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM

given that she has a disapproval rating of 55%

And 52% disapprove of Obama, according to Rasmussen Reports’ latest poll.

Emperor Norton on February 11, 2010 at 11:53 AM

faux-pollster /

OmahaConservative on February 11, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Well, Romney might go all moderate on us.

Mitt Romney is the subject of a long profile by David S. Bernstein in today’s Boston Phoenix. Bernstein argues that Romney is moving back toward the center after running as a strong, anti-McCain conservative in 2008. According to Bernstein, in his forthcoming book the former Massachusetts governor will defend TARP, say climate change is for real, and argue that personal savings accounts must be a voluntary addition to Social Security, not replace the program altogether. Romney also will have to defend his Massachusetts health care plan, which is similar to the health bill pending in the Senate.
deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM

I read that article. There’s no way that’s his strategy. Unless he plans on running the worst primary campaign since Guiliani. Tacking to the center will win him no one’s support. The right will reject him. The left will stick with Obama. And the media will always back the Dem anyway.

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 11:55 AM

That’s what campaigns are for. Hillary had horrible favorables before she ran for President.

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM

True, but I actually see it differently. I don’t believe there are a lot of people that are “meh” on Palin. You either like her or you hate her. It’ll be hard to get those people who hate her to actually listen to her content of her speeches as I believe most Americans have made up their minds regarding Palin. It’s going to be an uphill battle for sure.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:55 AM

we’re gonna need an O’Bidenaturism soon

That’ll start after Barry resigns once he’s good and sick and tired of all of us.

Should be soon.

NoDonkey on February 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM

All right, Obama’s two points ahead of a generic GOP candidate, but how many points is he behind Sarah Palin?

Emperor Norton on February 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM

They aren’t polling ANYBODY one on one against Honolulu Barry.

They shield Obama too much.

portlandon on February 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM

It’s sad really.

How hard would it have been for him to govern in a manner that reflected the main concepts of his campaign?

It was a winning campaign. People wanted what he said he would do.

Instead he lied to everyone. He continues to lie to anyone that will still listen. He refuses to accept the reality of the situation.

It’s a tragedy. What a waste.

Dorvillian on February 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM

I’m a Palin fan, but she as a lot of work to do to improve her image.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM

I tend to agree. If Obama’s track record weren’t so awful, I suspect he would shred her in one on one debates, which place a lot more weight on style over substance. However, with his history of failure for her to feast on, that advantage disappears.

a capella on February 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM

Paging Hillary Clinton, Paging Hillary Clinton. Your wanted at DNC Headquarters.

PappaMac on February 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM

the former Massachusetts governor will defend TARP, say climate change is for real, and. . .defend [the]Massachusetts health care plan.

Is Michael Dukakis running again?

Emperor Norton on February 11, 2010 at 11:59 AM

True, but I actually see it differently. I don’t believe there are a lot of people that are “meh” on Palin. You either like her or you hate her. It’ll be hard to get those people who hate her to actually listen to her content of her speeches as I believe most Americans have made up their minds regarding Palin. It’s going to be an uphill battle for sure.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:55 AM

The far left hates her. But they make up about 20% of the country and will never vote for a Republican anyway(or at least they’d never admit it). But 40% of the electorate is conservative and she’d have them locked up the moment she announced her candidacy. That leaves her needing 12-15% of independent and moderate voters. You’re telling me that after 4 years of Obama, they’re gonna choose to double down on his agenda?

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 11:59 AM

“… but she as a lot of work to do to improve her image.”

[deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM]

Agreed. I don’t think she’ll have the broad experience (caveat: I don’t think anyone under 60 could) so I’ll expect her to tack to a specialization. I’d recommend management and then build a team of advisers with the experience that speaks to the values and positions she holds.

Dusty on February 11, 2010 at 11:59 AM

Paging Hillary Clinton, Paging Hillary Clinton. Your wanted at DNC Headquarters.

PappaMac on February 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM

I suspect you are correct. But has that happened with the DNC before?

Johnnyreb on February 11, 2010 at 12:02 PM

I tend to agree. If Obama’s track record weren’t so awful, I suspect he would shred her in one on one debates, which place a lot more weight on style over substance. However, with his history of failure for her to feast on, that advantage disappears.

a capella on February 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM

I personally believe she would do really well against a debate with Obama. She’s doing better with her interviews and speeches, and I know she isn’t scared to really take it to him. I think the debates would be fun to watch.

The far left hates her. But they make up about 20% of the country and will never vote for a Republican anyway(or at least they’d never admit it). But 40% of the electorate is conservative and she’d have them locked up the moment she announced her candidacy. That leaves her needing 12-15% of independent and moderate voters. You’re telling me that after 4 years of Obama, they’re gonna choose to double down on his agenda?

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 11:59 AM

Not sure. I would hope they wouldn’t vote for “more of the same,” but it depends how much they really dislike Palin honestly.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Well, Romney might go all moderate on us.

Mitt Romney is the subject of a long profile by David S. Bernstein in today’s Boston Phoenix. Bernstein argues that Romney is moving back toward the center after running as a strong, anti-McCain conservative in 2008. According to Bernstein, in his forthcoming book the former Massachusetts governor will defend TARP, say climate change is for real, and argue that personal savings accounts must be a voluntary addition to Social Security, not replace the program altogether. Romney also will have to defend his Massachusetts health care plan, which is similar to the health bill pending in the Senate.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Yes, I read this earlier. Well I guess if that is true then Romney will own the “flip-flop” meme in 2012. As a former supporter, I will not vote for him if he changes his stances from 2008.

KickandSwimMom on February 11, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Not sure. I would hope they wouldn’t vote for “more of the same,” but it depends how much they really dislike Palin honestly.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 12:03 PM

If the American voters hate her so much that they cut off their nose to spite their face, then I weep for the future of this nation. At least in 2008 you could argue that uninformed(and in many cases, dumb) people got hoodwinked. They can’t fall back on that excuse in 2012.

Doughboy on February 11, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Paging Hillary Clinton

As inept as Barry is, Hillary would have been worse.

Just as unqualified, ignorant, arrogant and she may have been able to pass some of Barry’s excrable agenda.

The last thing this country needs is for an incompetent witch to follow up on Jughead’s folly.

NoDonkey on February 11, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Yes, I read this earlier. Well I guess if that is true then Romney will own the “flip-flop” meme in 2012. As a former supporter, I will not vote for him if he changes his stances from 2008.

KickandSwimMom on February 11, 2010 at 12:04 PM

There is also rumor he would pick Meg Whitman as the VP if he wins. I don’t know much about her honestly so I can’t really make a comment on how I feel about that.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Let’s see you blame this one on GWB homey.

ted c on February 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Johnnyreb on February 11, 2010 at 12:02 PM

Didn’t Teddy challenge Carter? Anyone?

DanaSmiles on February 11, 2010 at 12:07 PM

There is also rumor he would pick Meg Whitman as the VP if he wins. I don’t know much about her honestly so I can’t really make a comment on how I feel about that.

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Romney’s been hanging around the beltway too much methinks. Who the hell is advising him Peggy Noonan?

KickandSwimMom on February 11, 2010 at 12:07 PM

Ed, how is this in historical terms, for presidents after one year?
W — right after Sept. 11th, so that’s not a good comparison, but what about Clinton, Bush 41, Reagan, and Carter?

rbj on February 11, 2010 at 12:08 PM

One term wonder.

galvestonian on February 11, 2010 at 12:08 PM

Doughboy, the far Left hates anything-everyone outside of their Marxist global point. They will double down on their loss, fully invested as they are, and thug their power retention.

Of course they hate Palin. And I’m sure that Palin hates their design and tactics as much as any non-Marxist would.

maverick muse on February 11, 2010 at 12:09 PM

In 1980, Kennedy challenged Carter, his own party’s sitting President, for the Democratic nomination. Kennedy’s bid was hampered by questions of Chappaquiddick and by an interview with CBS Newsman Roger Mudd, who asked the straightforward question, “Why do you want to be President?” Kennedy couldn’t come up with a straightforward answer. Carter was nominated for re-election, but the party’s divisions, largely fueled by Kennedy, ensured victory for Ronald Reagan’s campaign and agenda.

yep

DanaSmiles on February 11, 2010 at 12:10 PM

One term wonder.

galvestonian on February 11, 2010 at 12:08 PM

cue Milli Vanilli

ted c on February 11, 2010 at 12:10 PM

I love Texas :)

We found Obama’s approval with independents in Texas at 19/70. Worst we’ve seen anywhere: http://tinyurl.com/yf89n2v

deidre on February 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM

NYT HEADLINE:

OBAMA, UNOPPOSED, WINS RE-ELECTION BY 2% IN NATIONAL VOTING; 48% OF COUNTRY VOTES FOR NOBODY

BobMbx on February 11, 2010 at 12:14 PM

You know Zero is in deep excrement when even the ever-genuflecting Gallup is having difficulty cooking the numbers for him.

viking01 on February 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM

I’m not in the Hillary camp by no means. I’m just saying that this is the logical call for the DNC. She will be leaving the SOS position before this falls election, just in time to start hammering Barry on his lack of ability to lead.

Conservatives shouldn’t worry about running against Barry, they should be focusing on running against Shillary.

PappaMac on February 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM

I’m a little sick and tired of reading of these polls that show how likable Obama is and how the public is against his policies, but still like him personally. That his low approval ratings are only about his policies.

That’s pretty much crap. The man is supremely unlikable. He has no sense of humor at all. His speaking style is boring at best. He’s a stuck up, self serving snob on his best day. He’s pretty much Frazier Crane without the endearing qualities.

His higher personal approval rating just means people don’t want to be seen as racists for saying they don’t really like the man.

And we really don’t know him all that well to say whether we like him or not. I admit I don’t like him, but I also admit I don’t have much to base that on except not being able to stand listening to the man try to finish a sentence.

Jaynie59 on February 11, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Addendum: John McCain? He got 7%, just behind his former running mate, who got 11%.

Do we think The Maverick will campaign for The ‘Cuda?

Karma is a bitch.

BobMbx on February 11, 2010 at 12:18 PM

This is an “optimistic” poll for Obama.

The fact is … we still have three, long years of ObamaFunk to get through. He’s not going to be the nominee of his party unless he veers “hard left” and the lefties put a complete smackdown on the centrists in the Democratic party. If that happens – it’s good news for us … WE WIN.

If he veers to the center – the Lefties will slash and burn everything with their temper tantrums. If that happens – it’s good news for us … WE WIN.

He’s not moving to the center – you can bet your arse on that.

Hard to imagine a scenario where we don’t win in 2012.
I say shoot for the fence – DeMint / Palin 2012!

HondaV65 on February 11, 2010 at 12:19 PM

A poor showing when you know the results are skewed as is all data from White House. Only difference is this one will not be revised by MSM in a week.

bluegrass on February 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Hard to imagine a scenario where we don’t win in 2012.I say shoot for the fence – DeMint / Palin 2012!

HondaV65 on February 11, 2010 at 12:19 PM

I give you Newt.

BTW, let’s get it straight: In 2012, it will be “Palin/???”. Thats the correct format. Just fill in the blank.

BobMbx on February 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM

Promote the platform. The 2012 candidate banter is only the window dressing right now. If we’re to discuss preferable candidates this early, at least start from the strongest conservative expertise. We’re drilling holes to China regurgitating promotional rhetoric regarding the same names for 2012 that failed in 2008. For example, discuss John Bolton’s character strengths and judicial and international experience that would direct America wisely from the Oval Office. He’s been “diagnosed” a neoconservative. Explicate neoconservatism so that Republicans and Independents know what the label covers from the Ivy League.

The only criticism of Palin from conservative Tea Party voters is that, knowingly or not, she is being used by neoconservatives to bring the Tea Party into the neoconservative GOP fold. That essentially dilutes and pollutes the entire Tea Party effort into more of the same old corrupt politics as usual.

Which conservative elements within GOP neoconservatism does the Tea Party endorse or repudiate? That discussion would produce a lot more thought provoked enlightened voters than the who do you like best blog-shtick.

Define the platform. Vote the platform. Get the candidate whose ideology and record IS the platform.

maverick muse on February 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM

Which Republican do Gallup respondents see in that position? The top five in order are Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, John McCain (?), Scott Brown, and Mike Huckabee. Bobby Jindal and Tim Pawlenty also appear on the list, as does Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul, but 42% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents offered no name at all. Romney, topping the list, only got 14% of respondents to name him (unprompted).

We can scratch McCain (we will NEVER go back there), Gingrich (Scozofava and Global Warming? I think not!), Paul (foreign policy loon).
Jindal (who can forget the first Obama rebuttal?) and Pawlenty (some RINO tendencies), Brown (don’t think the Tea Parties will support him over a real conservative) are improbable.
That leaves Romney, Palin, Huckabee. The more things change…
Sarah would have my vote in that case, but it’s early yet.

Christian Conservative on February 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Hillary has her own worries too. Besides being a bad joke as SecState just about anything the Left would try to throw at the likable Palin is more likely to ricochet off and stick to angry Hillary – yes, Hillarycare Hillary, Bubba’s memory challenged (under oath) doormat who wanted to nationalize health care just like the Obamacare the Obamster does today, remember her?

viking01 on February 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Before all you romneyhaters go off on the above linked story, read the damn header on the article, and consider the source. Boston media have any love lost for Romney? When looking at criticism, look who it comes from- Crist endorsed McCain over Romney, giving McCain the nomination. How’s Crist working out for you all now?

drballard on February 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM

I for one hope that we are not too quick to designate a front runner. Contrary to conventional wisdom that a protracted primary weakens the nominee for the general, going into ’12 I feel the opposite to be the case.

To forestall the favored tactic of the Progressives of implementing what to date has been an effective utilization of Saul Alinsky’s isolate, pesonalize and demonize. The less time we give them focus on one target, spread out their oppo-research effort and put such tactics to use will hinder BHO’s re-election efforts.

Conversely, our target is already designated (provided Hilly doesn’t get in), is increasingly isolated, but we must be careful not to demonize. I know that it would be easy to do, but I fear it’d backfire. We must non-emotionally demonstrate only that which is provable, and there is plenty, but do so relentlessly from now till 11/4/12.

Archimedes on February 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM

Hopefully Clinton will remain the only elected two term Democratic president since FDR.

mwdiver on February 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM

Jaynie59 on February 11, 2010 at 12:17 PM

i’ve got a friend who still thinks dear leader walks on water that he inherited, yada, yada, yada….she has blinders on big time

cmsinaz on February 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM

Single term president? Precedented!

Obama in January ’13? Un-presidented!

Dirty Creature on February 11, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Scott Brown? Must be the Cosmo spread.

Buy Danish on February 11, 2010 at 1:10 PM

“You HotAirians…….and other peasants fret not about the polls or elections in 2010 or 2012, you’ve had your last free one….and you don’t even realize it”.

What the Libs/Marxists/Socialists/Alinskyites in the White House are really thinking.

***”CRISIS”***

How about right before the November 2010 elections coincidentally just before another American election that will allow The Caliph to appear presidential and save the Libs control of Congress, or heck just dissolve it altogether. And so what if the Progressives lose 200 seats…

..call them back for a lame duck session….since they all got the boot anyway and have them payback the peasants/serfs by PASSING OBAMACARE IN THE LAME DUCK SESSION and doing whatever else they want.

PappyD61 on February 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM

If November 2010 goes the way it appears to be headed then if it’s Bambi vs. Hillary the two will be chartering every available bus to throw each other under. It’ll be like the demand for limos at the Copenhagen Circus. Zero would probably fire Hillary then Rahm, Holder and most of the Clintoon mudslingers would start to wonder to whom their decrepit loyalties lie. To the Clintoons who made them and in some ways stuck with the fellow crooks or to Bambi who sees a fall guy around every corner with his personal hopey-changy prospects for 2012 dimming further every day?

viking01 on February 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM

Forget the Hope. Focus on Change.

misterpeasea on February 11, 2010 at 1:22 PM

When you factor in the number of blacks in America and their overwhelming blind support for him, it tells the story of how much of “everybody else” supports him. It is almost in the single digits.

saiga on February 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM

Is Intrade taking bets on whether Obama decides not to seek re-election?

MarkTheGreat on February 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM

I dint believe anything in a Gallup Poll…

CCRWM on February 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM

Is Intrade taking bets on whether Obama decides not to seek re-election?

Zero will not be his party’s nominee in ’12. His feelings on the matter will be of no consequence one way or the other.

Dirty Creature on February 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM

I’d like to see a Ryan/Palin ticket. Too bad Ryan said he won’t run though.

chewmeister on February 11, 2010 at 1:43 PM

The influence of Obama’s personal likability appears to be influencing job approval.

Who are these people who think BO is ‘personally likable’?!?!
Yuck. When I 1st heard him speak, all I could think of was con man & liar.
I thought the same thing about Clinton.
I liked GWB bcs I thought he just spoke from the heart-but I did disagree with a lot of things he did.
Just bcs a boss is likable doesn’t mean he does his job.
Our principal tries to be likable, & he can be, but he’s a lazy moron & I can’t stand him just bcs of that.

Badger40 on February 11, 2010 at 1:51 PM

More importantly, how does HRC poll against Obama?

Johnson on February 11, 2010 at 1:51 PM

When you factor in the number of blacks in America and their overwhelming blind support for him, it tells the story of how much of “everybody else” supports him. It is almost in the single digits.

saiga on February 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM

Guess you’re right. There’s a lot of COlin Powels out there.

Badger40 on February 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM

Don’t underestimate the Republicans’ capacity to screw this up.

Ted Torgerson on February 11, 2010 at 1:59 PM

He’s still leading? That’s the shocking part.

capitalist piglet on February 11, 2010 at 1:59 PM

When you factor in the number of blacks in America and their overwhelming blind support for him, it tells the story of how much of “everybody else” supports him. It is almost in the single digits.

saiga on February 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM

Generally, black people support Democrats, not other black politicians. You don’t see Michael Steele having any kind of positive effect on black Americans. “Everybody else” is kind of unfair, it’s like saying, “If you discount the extremely religious, think of how little Republican support there would be!”

As to the poll as a whole, a generic candidate is a lot different than an actual candidate. I’d probably vote for Romney over Obama, but I’d definitely vote for Obama over Palin or Huckabee. So if you ask me to answer the question generically, I’d support the Republican (probably).

But a diehard Palin/Huckabee supporter, if their candidate is not chosen, may choose to write in for a third party candidate, may prefer Obama to the GOP option, or may just want to stay home on election day.

But there are many people who may not be particularly enthused about Obama, but who will go out to the polls to vote *against* a Republican candidate (this is Palin’s biggest weakness).

In other words, don’t get too excited. A generic candidate helps the GOP in an opinion poll more than a specific candidate does.

Proud Rino on February 11, 2010 at 2:02 PM

, but I’d definitely vote for Obama over Palin or Huckabee

Proud Rino on February 11, 2010 at 2:02 PM

Than you deserve the pocket picking, socialist perp walk you’ll get when Obama is elected in ’12.

Your logic is flawed. Anybody but Obama.

portlandon on February 11, 2010 at 2:15 PM

Than you deserve the pocket picking, socialist perp walk you’ll get when Obama is elected in ‘12.

Your logic is flawed. Anybody but Obama.

portlandon on February 11, 2010 at 2:15 PM

Congratulations on completely missing the point of my comment.

Proud Rino on February 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM

The man is on track to exceed Democratic President James Buchanan as the Ultimate Neronic Fiddler.

unclesmrgol on February 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM

“I will be happy to run against the ‘corpse‘ of John McCain” –Obama

Schadenfreude on February 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32837.html

*confirmed*

Nobody can beat B+ in 2012.

ted c on February 11, 2010 at 3:05 PM

The field appears to be wide open, and voters appear to be open to a wide variety of candidates to challenge Obama for the White House — and that’s not a sign that Obama is impressing anyone with his performance thus far.

still a good solid B+ though….take a bow buddy.

ted c on February 11, 2010 at 3:07 PM

, but I’d definitely vote for Obama over Palin or Huckabee

Proud Rino on February 11, 2010 at 2:02 PM
Than you deserve the pocket picking, socialist perp walk you’ll get when Obama is elected in ‘12.

Your logic is flawed. Anybody but Obama.

portlandon on February 11, 2010 at 2:15 PM

portlandon, you must realize that PR is really just an Obama voter from the get go.
From the vault:

Wow! So RINO are you saying you voted for Obama?
Christian Conservative on September 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM

Yep. I said before this whole thing started I wouldn’t vote for McCain or Edwards under any circumstances.

Proud Rino on September 29, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Christian Conservative on February 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM

So I’ve got a shot!

mankai on February 11, 2010 at 3:32 PM

Things are soooo bad for this administration that, not only are they continually blaming Bush for their failures, that they are also now forwarding his successes into Obama’s win column: from the LA Times and a Larry King interview with Sheriff Joe Biden.

Now, the Obama-Biden pair that opposed the Iraq war and its tactics and predicted their failure is prepared to accept credit for its success.

It seems that Biden, who’s from Delaware when he’s in Delaware and Pennsylvania when in Pennsylvania, is certain now that Iraq will turn out to be one of the Obama-Biden administration’s greatest achievements.No, really.

Here’s how Biden put it to Lar:

I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.

BWWWWHHHHHAAAAT!!!??? EXCUSE Me?

Shark jumping–new pasttime in the WH.

ted c on February 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Comment pages: 1 2