Did Palin’s position “deteriorate significantly” in WaPo/ABC poll?

posted at 7:03 pm on February 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The Washington Post claims that its latest polling that Sarah Palin’s polling position has “deteriorated significantly” in its latest polling, which has created two types of mail in my in-box this afternoon.  One type accuses me of not reporting the news because it’s bad for Palin, and the other accuses  me of planning to report the news because it’s bad for Palin.  The only trouble with both theories is that the poll numbers didn’t really change all that much:

Two-thirds of Americans are “dissatisfied” or downright “angry” about the way the federal government is working, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. On average, the public estimates that 53 cents of every tax dollar they send to Washington is “wasted.”

Despite the disapproval of government, few Americans say they know much about the “tea party” movement, which emerged last year and attracted voters angry at a government they thought was spending recklessly and overstepping its constitutional powers. And the new poll shows that the political standing of former Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, who was the keynote speaker last week at the first National Tea Party Convention, has deteriorated significantly.

The opening is clear: Public dissatisfaction with how Washington operates is at its highest level in Post-ABC polling in more than a decade — since the months after the Republican-led government shutdown in 1996 — and negative ratings of the two major parties hover near record highs.

But nearly two-thirds of those polled say they know just some, very little or nothing about what the tea party movement stands for. About one in eight says they know “a great deal” about the positions of tea party groups, but the lack of information does not erase the appeal: About 45 percent of all Americans say they agree at least somewhat with tea partiers on issues, including majorities of Republicans and independents.

Which national politician has the most identification with the Tea Party movement?  Sarah Palin, of course, who spoke at the Tea Party Nation convention this past week.  If the Republicans and independents feel so positively about the movement that Palin supports so strongly, does it make any sense that Palin’s standing among the same people would “deteriorate significantly”?

Well, no, because it hasn’t, at least not that much.  The WaPo/ABC poll in November showed Palin’s numbers as 43/52, and the previous July at 40/53 (among adults, not registered or likely voters).  This poll has her at 37/55, drifting a bit from November but within the MOE of July’s numbers, right after she resigned as governor.  The one caveat I’d attach to that is that those earlier samples were ridiculously tilted in favor of Democrats, with 11- and 14-point gaps, while Democrats have a six-point advantage in this poll.  I’d expect to see a bump upwards with the more realistic sample, but it’s more statistical noise than a “significant deterioration of support.”

In comparison, let’s see how the Post reported Obama’s approval ratings:

Obama’s overall approval rating is holding steady, with 51 percent of respondents giving him positive marks and 46 percent rating him negatively.

Here are Obama’s approval/disapproval from the same surveys as those on Palin:

  • 2/8/10 (this week): 51/46
  • 11/15/09: 56/42
  • 7/18/09: 59/37

In the three-month period, Obama lost nine points in the gap to Palin’s nine, and in the seven-month period losing 17 points to Palin’s five.  Which person’s position has “deteriorated significantly” in that comparison?  If Palin’s is a significant deterioration, then Obama’s is a free-fall, not “holding steady.”  It appears that the Post has a much different standard for analyzing a politician who hasn’t yet committed to run for any office yet and the President of the United States, and that may be as it should — but the POTUS should be held to the higher standard.

Addendum: Happy birthday to Gov. Palin, too.

Update: I dropped in on some comment threads last night to let people know that Allahpundit is on vacation, but I figured this was a good post to use to remind everyone and let people know who hadn’t heard.  He’ll be back on Monday.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

I love this Sara Palin the way she baits the left. I laugh so hard that she gets them screaming. The left’s screams have no effect on her and they cannot understand why she is not crumbling to all the name calling and black listing of the left. She really messes the minds of the progressives. I wish I had that talent.

mixplix on February 12, 2010 at 6:50 PM

Don’t worry about those elections in 2010 or 2012 boys…..

Heres’ the latest from Drudge:

NYT SATURDAY: White House officials are searching for ways for Obama to ‘use executive powers to advance energy, environmental and other policy priorities’… Developing…

PappyD61 on February 12, 2010 at 8:00 PM

*Sigh*
Another veiled attack on Palin.
Jim Vanderhei, the liberals excuse for a Journalist…………

Sarah Palin clearly conveys substantive messages in just a few memorable words.
Palin-haters always seem to need several pages of contorted obfuscation and incoherent ravings…and you can never remember who they are or what their point is.

Vanderhei….“And if Palin does not exactly love us, she’s smart enough to recognize how quickly reporters devour every provocative remark she utters. “She knows how to exploit our weakness” to guarantee herself exposure far out of proportion to her actual influence in Republican politics.”

They just give her so much to play with…………

Let the world class squirming begin! Go Sarah!

They spend an absolutely incredible amount of time slamming this woman from Alaska, who’s supposed to be “irrelevant” I can’t imagine why???
Bwuuuuuhhhhhhaaaaahhhhhaaaaa

Sarah rising, Obama failing.
GOOD for AmericaJ

idesign on February 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM

I just like Sarah, she is real. I love the way she drives the left nuts. Too bad I live in a state that is very blue.

wi farmgirl on February 12, 2010 at 11:49 PM

We just won 3 blue state races. Got’aaa get involved.

idesign on February 12, 2010 at 11:58 PM

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/02/12/palins_approval_ratings_slipping.html

Apparently the majority of those who are conservative don’t think so much of the sainted one.

That could be a valuable platform for a national campaign, but even a politician with Palin’s undeniable charisma is eventually going to have to, you know, say something. Beyond nostrums about “common-sense solutions,” I mean.

What does Palin actually propose? I realize she might consider this a trick question, like the time that mean Katie Couric asked about what she reads. But isn’t it awfully patronizing to act as if her followers are so dazzled by her very presence that they will never seek to pin her down on a single issue? The polls certainly suggest this is a serious miscalculation.

There’s a word for those who, like Palin, act as if the voters are mere sheep who don’t need to be troubled by discussion of what their government should actually do. The word — and Palin might want to cover her ears — is elitist.

Bradky on February 13, 2010 at 12:33 AM

Bradky on February 13, 2010 at 12:33 AM

At that rate, un geological time, she will catch up with your approval rating. You are neither clever or informative.

daesleeper on February 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3