Without Murtha, Dems now one vote short of passing ObamaCare in House

posted at 8:29 pm on February 8, 2010 by Allahpundit
printer-friendly

A nice catch by Philip Klein that completely eluded me earlier. With 218 votes needed to pass Reid’s bill, the number of Democrats who voted for the House’s ObamaCare bill last year now stands at … 217.

Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill. This doesn’t even take into account the pro-life Democrats led by Bart Stupak who are prepared to vote “no.” While there’s been talk that Pelosi had some votes in reserve the first time around, the point is that those members felt they needed to vote against the bill — and the political environment has deteriorated substantially for Democrats since then

Another complicating factor is Rep. Neil Abercrombie. The Hawaii Democrat announced early last month that he would resign Feb. 28 run for governor. However, in his statement announcing his resignation, he said that he had ensured Pelosi that he’d be around to continue supporting the health care bill. Back when he made that statement, Scott Brown hadn’t won yet, and thus the end of this month seemed like plenty of time to finalize the health care bill. Now that the timeline has been pushed back, perhaps he’d postpone the effective date of his resignation if Pelosi still needed his vote.

Bizarrely, just three weeks after Scotty B shocked the world in Massachusetts, we’re now looking at a re-run of that race in PA-12. It’s a special election to fill out a nationally recognized legislator’s term, and the winner stands to cast the deciding vote on O-Care in his chamber. Expect the Republican nominee to run hard on that point, especially since his opponent is bound to run on the fact that, with the Dems in power, he can deliver more earmarks for Murtha’s district than a Republican could. Exit question: Is opposition to ObamaCare so intense in Johnstown that voters there might cut off their supply of pork because of it? I’m skeptical.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I’m not so sure that pork helps any candidate these days. Nebraska turned on Nelson big time. I was talking to a colleague in Vermont yesterday and he told me about this big Stimulus project to get high speed internet to schools and libraries and even though his company stands to benefit by it, general perception of any Stimulus money is bad. It’s like taking blood money or something. He was pretty disgusted by the whole idea of it.

Jaynie59 on February 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM

Nebraska turned on Nelson big time
Jaynie59 on February 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM

We can’t get the traitor recalled in 2010, so there is fundraising going on right now to get rid of Nelson in 2012. Nebraska means business. Sure wished the other states would do the same to stop this stupid spending.

yoda on February 9, 2010 at 7:06 AM

I recently asked the question that given the President’s continued drive for HCR and news the White House is prepping for SCOTUS replacements, “do they know that somebody is ill or about to die ?”

I guess not.

J_Crater on February 9, 2010 at 7:23 AM

Class.

OmahaConservative on February 9, 2010 at 7:35 AM

Forgive me. I just don’t understand. Just because Murtha died, how does that impact his ability to vote? Or do dead Dummycraps only vote in elections? Just wondering. /sarc

Crusader Rabbit on February 9, 2010 at 8:06 AM

yknow, I never really believed in the saying “God protects fools, lovers, and the United States of America,” but…first Kennedy/Brown and now this…hm….

das411 on February 9, 2010 at 12:41 AM

It does say in the Bible that God will bless those who bless Israel, and curse those who curse it.

MarkTheGreat on February 9, 2010 at 8:12 AM

William Russell was a good candidate against Murtha, but a LOT of voters didn’t vote for either man because they considered Russell a carpet bagger. The 2006 Candidate Diana Irey from little Washington would probably be a better candidiate against any DEM running. This district is very insular.

enigma00825 on February 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM

Will the dems investigate the mysterious and unexpected death of this most honest legislator?

I suspect it was Bush’s fault.

mechkiller_k on February 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM

I wonder if the dems can pass Obamunistcare at all now, in any case. Lord Bozo is trying to recruit Republicans to support it now and that ain’t gonna work either.

dogsoldier on February 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM

Was this at Walter Reid? I hope no doctor loses a rank for a surgery error but the irony of that has to be noticed. I know it is in very poor taste to mention it, but it is like the proverbial elephant in the room no one wants to mention but everyone notices.

I think Bethesda Naval. And yes, I noticed the irony of it being a government health care facility.

CJ on February 9, 2010 at 8:39 AM

There are any number of fine and worthy jokes to be made about this news, but the weak and infirm will wet themselves if I voice these jokes.

And I don’t need to anyway — you all know the joke already, so let’s just enjoy a hearty laugh.

BWWWAAAAaaaaaahahahahahahahaha….

Jaibones on February 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM

Exit question: Is opposition to ObamaCare so intense in Johnstown that voters there might cut off their supply of pork because of it? I’m skeptical.

Brilliantly asked, and logically answered.

No group of citizens who would support that fat, corrupt piece of sh!t and keep him in office while fu@ked the American public like so many bleating sheep would suddenly reverse field and get all righteous and principled.

Pittsburgh is obviously retarded.

Jaibones on February 9, 2010 at 8:54 AM

Crazy Nancy will buy a blue dog vote, or 2 or 10. They will do whatever it takes.
This ain’t over.

mountainmanbob on February 9, 2010 at 8:56 AM

I am a voter and I want less pork!! I am disgusted when I log on to my Republican Senators’ web pages and see them BRAGGING about the pork they brought home to Georgia.

Elizabetty on February 9, 2010 at 10:05 AM

Well ain’t that a revolting development?

kens on February 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM

Heh. With one of his champions dead of old age and another unseated in a tournament, King Obama is now short of support…

Dark-Star on February 9, 2010 at 10:20 AM

Pork helps a few privileged donors and recipients. Ordinary people don’t want it. I predict that this will be a repeat of Mass.

PattyJ on February 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM

Forgive me. I just don’t understand. Just because Murtha died, how does that impact his ability to vote? Or do dead Dummycraps only vote in elections? Just wondering. /sarc

Crusader Rabbit on February 9, 2010 at 8:06 AM

You know, like Obama receiving a letter from the lady who passed away buried in an Obama T-shirt.

The Dems will just put up a cardboard image of Murtha and someone will hide behind it and cast his vote.

All those Scrooge Republicans who don’t have a spare trillion for health care will face the Ghost of Christmas Past. /sarc

Steve Z on February 9, 2010 at 10:47 AM

There are any number of fine and worthy jokes to be made about this news, but the weak and infirm will wet themselves if I voice these jokes.
[...]

Jaibones on February 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM

Just hold onto ‘em until after he’s decently buried, and then we can all laugh.

Mary in LA on February 9, 2010 at 1:29 PM

… Which plague are we up to by now!?

leftnomore on February 9, 2010 at 2:44 AM

Umm… the plague of ‘Rats, I think! :-)

Mary in LA on February 9, 2010 at 1:58 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.