Scarborough: Did Chris Wallace roll his eyes at Palin?
posted at 7:48 pm on February 8, 2010 by Allahpundit
Via Breitbart. I’m going to say no just because I always say no when we play these dopey games involving ambiguous physical gestures, but it’s worth a watch on a slow Monday news night. A quote via Newsbusters from earlier in the segment (not seen in the clip):
JOE SCARBOROUGH: You know, Mika, I’ve just got to say this about Sarah Palin. Seriously. I was cheering for her early on as I cheer for anybody who’s new on the scene, Republican or Democratic. And she was bashed, unfairly, by the press early on, before they even knew who she was. But it seems to me that she keeps lowering the bar for herself. Forget the speech [to the Tea Party convention]. Look at the end of Chris Wallace’s interview [on yesterday's Fox News Sunday] where he rolls his eyes, embarrassed. There’s no doubt he is. Now he will deny that. But Chris was sending a message to all his friends: yes I know. She is not a serious thinker.
And then, look at the press conference afterwards [the convention], and then sneak into rooms, be a fly on the wall of top conservatives that will bow and scrape to Sarah Palin publicly, but behind the scenes are angry that she will just not sit down and study issues.
There were no catastrophic gaffes in yesterday’s interview, so either she knew the issues well enough to satisfy Wallace or else Wallace took care not to ask anything of Fox’s newest contributor that might trip her up. Either way, he’s not a man in a position to eye-roll. Possibly relevant, possibly not: A few days before his interview with Sarahcuda, he made a joke about her sitting on his lap for which he was promptly and duly lambasted by Jeri Thompson. A sign that he really doesn’t respect Palin or just an innocent-ish goof gone wrong?
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Who’s Meghan McCain??? I’ve seen pictures and all I can say is that boiled down, she would provide a few tanks of bio-diesal…Otherwise, totally worthless!
Nozzle on February 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM
I don’t know if he rolled his eyes, or not, and whether it was a direct reaction to Palin, or not. I really don’t care.
What I do see however, that even Fox has it’s “media elitists”, and they, and Democrats in Washington D.C. are afraid. Why? Because most of them come from Ivy league schools, and are insiders. It scares the hell out of them, that some woman, from small town Alaska could actually win, and run things better, and prove, you don’t need an Ivy league education, or be an insider, to do the job they believe exclusively belongs to them, and that they are the ONLY ones who can do it.
Same goes for those snotty Republicans that believe this way.
capejasmine on February 8, 2010 at 9:33 PM
Andrea Mitchell boiled down wouldn’t provide enough diesal to start a truck…Totally worthless…Her being a journalist deprives a truckstop of a cleaning lady, and that’s a shame…Joe Scarborough needs to be tried as a communist infitrator. I put together a presentation for him in Pensacola when he fraudulantly claimed to Represent the good people of Florida as a Republican Representive. We now know the truth…he’s pretty tall for a Floridian, I didn’t know they stacked shit that high…Learn something everyday…
Nozzle on February 8, 2010 at 9:37 PM
Oh I forgot: The harpies also accused Palin of calling for Obama to declare war on Iran. And then Baba WaWa whips out her notecard (irony, anyone?) so she can read Palin’s quote verbatim, lest anyone think she couldn’t possibly have dared to say something so shocking and reads:
I realize Walters is older than dirt and it’s probably been awhile since she’s looked at an English textbook, but she might want to review the basic rules of grammar. It’s pretty obvious from reading that quote that she was saying she hoped he would support Israel, not that she thinks he ought to go to war with Iran. The senile old bat needs to retire.
NoLeftTurn on February 8, 2010 at 9:42 PM
Yep that’s it. You discovered it, Joe: Palin’s Zapruder film. Chris Wallace slipped up and blew the cover on the GOP leadership’s anti-Palin stance. And you were there Joe, with your DVR slowing the video down frame by frame to ascertain that indeed Wallace’s eyes did advance up, to the right, down, eye blink, and back to center. Why Oswald’s magic bullet didn’t travel in such a circuitous route.
Joe, I look from this point forward to hearing your analysis of eye movements of anchors and reporters who interview The One to determine what the mood of the country is.
Mallard T. Drake on February 8, 2010 at 9:45 PM
Sarah Palin is going to beat up the left and take their lunch money before they even realize what’s happening.
Remember this, too: The entrenched GOP establishment sees her as a threat just as much as the entrenched Dem establishment.
In Alaska, she ran against the corrupt old-boy network in her own party–and won.
She’s a threat to all the right people!
tsj017 on February 8, 2010 at 9:46 PM
So how was that clip different than the “Cool Kids” sitting around talking smack about a classmate?
.
The Fourth(grade) Estate.
ronsfi on February 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM
Our founding fathers were all extremely intelligent and well-educated. So I wouldn’t exactly say a lack of knowledge and education is a great thing especially given the complex world we live in today. Simple slogans don’t tend to solve difficult problems.
Question is- if she were elected President and the job got tough and uncomfortable, would she quit? Hard to say based on her track record.
bayam on February 8, 2010 at 9:49 PM
So, Andrea wrote on her hand “in case the prompter broke”?
Meaning that she had a teleprompter AND a hand?
So where exactly is the comparison to Palin, who had only a hand, AFAICT, and no prompter?
Hmm. Is Andrea really that self-unaware?
So she and Barack have the ultimate crutch – the teleprompter – which she readily admits – and then she feels confident enough to slam Palin? Shegottabenuts.
RD on February 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM
I read at another forum that Wallace heard through his earphone to look at the other camera, which he di. If that is what happened then it was just a repositioning of his head and his eyes looking for the new camera. Joe needs to get a new job shoveling chicken shit for chicken farmer.
inspectorudy on February 8, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Keep wishing hard enough, and pimping that question hard enough, and your wish may yet come true.
Maybe not on this blog, but somewhere I’m sure.
RD on February 8, 2010 at 9:55 PM
I think I would like Palin as a person, but I can’t say I’m particularly impressed with her. Did she do some good things as governor of Alaska? Certainly, but governor is not President, and even though I’d like to see someone with executive experience in that office, I’d also like to see someone with intellectual prowess and a commitment to developing as deep an understanding in a variety of areas as possible. I have not yet seen Palin exhibit those qualities.
I know the Tea Party convention was not about policy, but I haven’t seen much more than cliches from her. I want to believe her ideology is sound, but to hear her compared to Reagan, as I see it, is to project on her our wishes, rather than to apprehend her as she is. She has been smeared abominably, and she has shown some real grace under that kind of pressure, but that doesn’t mean she is what this country needs as president. And the fact that we elected that dreadful Obama doesn’t sanctify Palin. I’m frightened for the future of our country, and believe we need someone who has a deeper understanding of various issues (such as economic principles) than Palin has shown herself to have. Loving your country is simply not enough.
DrMagnolias on February 8, 2010 at 9:58 PM
She’s smart enough to know that the biggestobstacle to our economy is an exploding public sector getting fat at the expense of the private sector
it isn’t nearly as difficult to undersand when one realizes this and she reiterates that point consistantly
SP is one of the few politicians that make that point
Sonosam on February 8, 2010 at 10:17 PM
good call ronsfi!!!
disillusioned on February 8, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Andrea Mitchell is a deeply unsatisfied woman.
Any good joke, as all comedians know, must contain an element of truth.
That’s why Andrea Mitchell should have written, “I need dick”, on the palm of her hand, instead the studio line-up of the Morning Blow.
Lame, Andrea.
David2.0 on February 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM
The fact that Sarah upsets so many people is due to the reality that a great many people completely agree with her, right down to her assessment of Obama.
Pundits hate how she simplifies things. What would they discuss if she’s right?
And she is.
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:22 PM
And Chris is just as chauvenistic as the rest of them, obviously.
His remark was way out of line regarding her sitting on his lap. Very unprofessional, so why give his eyeroll anymore credence than the act of a highly immature man whose “male” ego is on the romp?
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Aww. Look at MS-NBC’s Andrea Mitchell making fun of a former VP Candidate, instead of reporting the news. Mitchell is acting like she’s still in jr. high.
TN Mom on February 8, 2010 at 10:26 PM
I’ve had econ professors who have a deep understanding of the issues, but I wouldn’t want them to be president either. It doesn’t really take an economist, just someone with convictions and the integrity to abide by them. If it isn’t Palin, then someone else. But I see absolutely no potential on the horizon that would fit your requirements. And no, not Mitt Romney.
ddrintn on February 8, 2010 at 10:32 PM
What bothers me most is giving people like Wallace a pass on extreme unprofessionalism. Who is responsible for their actions and behaviors? Not Sarah.
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM
So who would fit your criteria? Bush? Clinton?
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:35 PM
No, I can tell you he didn’t. Chris came out of EVERY single break with a strange look on his face. I don’t know if it was an “out of his own set” discomfort, or if the video cues were just not timely.
As I watched the show Sunday, Chris Wallace just really was off-cue on each re-intro from commercial breaks – he wasn’t comfortable.
MsUnderestimated on February 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM
Andrea is just with a losing network. They are pretty much at the desperate stage. The woman’s last assignment was to trail Palin all around Cosco hoping for a soundbite, which she didn’t get.
She’s not hard to figure out.
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM
That actually adds up to me. It’s not only an odd relationship, given her job with FOX, but then it’s a potential presidential candidate, too. The two roles don’t mesh.
AnninCA on February 8, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Bringing up Fox News fair and unbalanced eye movements may have been a bit overboard.
disillusioned on February 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM
OK. I clicked on the darn Politico link, unknowingly (which I detest doing) and then hit the video and saw it was 4 minutes plus of MSNBC and decided my life is just too precious to waste time on these people.
I did however, see the exchange with Imus and Wallace and was incensed by it!!! MR. NEWS objectifying the former VP candidate prior to the interview was just disgusting!!! He would have never said that to a male candidate. And then to be blinded to it and not apologize was even worse.
First, we had BOR and GB discussing their personal observations regarding the personal side of Palin on live TV post interview and now we have Wallace sexualizing her pre interview! Way to run a classy operation there, Roger.
Simply sexist and nonprofessional. I missed the segment when Megyn Kelly and Gretchen Carlson discussed how they personal perceived Mike Huckabee. Was he the most guarded person they had ever met? And who the F wouldn’t be on guard for whatever crackpot question GB could come up with out of the blue. That was a horrible interview from a journalistic perspective.
Clean it up, FOX! I vote with my remote.
Buckeye Babe on February 8, 2010 at 10:47 PM
I thought Sarah a great job in her interview and she’s definitely improved her game. I loved her answer to one of the questions he asked (can’t remember the question)and she answered it either “hell yes” or “hell no”. What is sickening to watch are all the people (left and right) putting her down because she is not at their social level. They think she is ignorant and that’s how they look at all us regular folks out here.
silvernana on February 8, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Note to Andrea. Go home and change your husband’s diaper.
Mr_Magoo on February 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM
Neither is failed community organizer, State Senator voting present while running for US Senate, or US Senator voting present while running for President.
I would rather have an inexperienced country lover than an inexperienced country hater.
Mr_Magoo on February 8, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Well put. I’ll second that notion.
disillusioned on February 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM
All I’ve got to say about this is :
.
“CORPSE-MAN”
JeffVader on February 8, 2010 at 11:04 PM
I don,t know if Wallace rolled his eyes or not.all i know is he is just as big of a lib as his father Mike.Take it for what it,s worth.
thmcbb on February 8, 2010 at 11:08 PM
“Mean Girls” comes to mind. I bet Andrea keeps a scrap book of Palin clippings.
SouthernGent on February 8, 2010 at 11:18 PM
2Brave2Bscared on February 8, 2010 at 11:28 PM
There they go again….
unclesmrgol on February 9, 2010 at 12:01 AM
When the oil companies tried to highball Alaska with the cost of the pipeline to transport Alaska’s oil to the Lower 48, Palin opened negotiations with a Canadian firm, TransCanada. When the oil companies refused to sweeten their offer, she struck a deal with TransCanada for a price far below that which the oil companies were offering.
Palin, as mayor of Wasilla, oversaw the tripling of the population of her town without any decrease in municipal services to any inhabitant. To fine-tune a budget to that level involves quite a bit of executive experience.
unclesmrgol on February 9, 2010 at 12:28 AM
Wow, that’s reading a lot into very very little, a momentary loss of professionalism, if anything. Chris will milk this for a week and have a response next Fox News Sunday.
David Gregory eat your heart out.
exdeadhead on February 9, 2010 at 12:40 AM
And another thing, he was reacting to her confident affirmative when he invited her back, maybe “politically” too confident, over-compensating unintentionally maybe. It is idiotic to stretch that several milli-seconds into a reaction to the entire interview.
More likely he was thinking back to Axlerod’s dumb expression in response to Chris saying, “Don’t be a stranger”.
It’s become awkward since the Big O (sorry Oscar) has figured out that Fox News has the audience he needs to persuade, as if. Silly President, you burned those bridges long ago.
exdeadhead on February 9, 2010 at 12:48 AM
For any and all questions, Palin picks from the following answers:
1. Lower taxes
2. Personal responsibility
3. Support the troops
4. Obama is evil.
5. Bible
6. Guns
If all else fails just shout “Lower taxes!”. “Lower taxes” will cure cancer. “Lower taxes” will cause world peace. “Lower taxes” will feed the world.
Decider on February 9, 2010 at 1:26 AM
You are learning. Taxes take money from places they should belong and put that money in places where it shouldn’t belong. That’s why, after just a term, those guys in Congress go from being middle class to wealthy. They are hunting for the power taxes buy. And that includes funding people who claim they will cure cancer, people who claim that a bit of money will cause world peace, and people who claim a bit of money will cure hunger. To make a lot you have to grease a lot of palms, and if the money isn’t yours, it’s so much easier…
unclesmrgol on February 9, 2010 at 1:31 AM
i notice Joe, Andrea and others are not talking about Palin’s speech where she gave detailed positions on many of the problems facing us. Her speech and her answers in Wallaces interview gave us Palin’s worldview and for some funny reason the left is doing everything it can to not talk about it. They wanted those answers for a year now. Palin gave it to them and instead they want to talk about an eyeroll or a palm. funny how that works out. It’s as if they do not want to talk about the policy within the sppech. the hope of Palin that we return to Reagan conservatism instead of Bush conservatism (liberalism) funny how that works out isn’t it.
unseen on February 9, 2010 at 2:07 AM
ahem. You have it wrong. She is indeed at their social level — or higher. She walks the walk as she talks the talk, and that sort of honesty is only present at the highest levels of our society — a level anyone of any economic means can aspire to.
unclesmrgol on February 9, 2010 at 2:15 AM
+100
You also forgot FDR, Reagan, Theodore Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, and a few others.
unclesmrgol on February 9, 2010 at 2:19 AM
BS. Most of our Founding Fathers were homeschooled and privately tutored. No (poison) ivy league schools to make them “elite” over the rest of us knuckledraggers. And many of them farmed.
It’s not slogans. You’re not a very good listener, apparently. It’s principles. Simple ones, like the ones that President Reagan (another small town, no name schooler) espoused. And President Reagan always said that it’s a lie when people say that complex problems require complex solutions.
Question is, why are you so ignorant of the Alaska laws which permitted her being hounded out of office that don’t exist for the POTUS?
Really, catch up on facts before you opine. It will save you some embarassment.
atheling on February 9, 2010 at 2:20 AM
Don’t you find this frightening? I do, and I simply do not believe that the best conservatives can do is Mitt Romney, or Sarah Palin. I would love to have an alternative to list, which I don’t–which is deeply disturbing.
Yes, I agree that she has executive experience, but I’m not sure she has the intellectual depth the job requires (Obama is a great example of someone whose intellect has been consistently overestimated, but of course, the Left always thinks they are the smartest people in the room–and that isn’t going so well for us). This doesn’t mean she needs an Ivy League background; it does mean that she needs to be able to speak in more than cliches.
From what I have seen so far, the differences between Palin and Reagan are significant–Reagan had a deep understanding in a variety of areas–economics again, human nature, the intent of the Founders–that I haven’t seen in Palin. When she was running with McCain, I thought she was probably hamstrung and had to limit her responses, but she is not in that position anymore, and I still don’t know her core principles, and how she would apply them to the various problems we face. For example, what does “We win, they lose” mean? It was a great line from Reagan because we’d heard specifics from him for quite some time; what does it mean from Palin? I don’t know.
DrMagnolias on February 9, 2010 at 5:01 AM
Bayam didn’t say the founders had Ivy League educations, but that they were extremely intelligent and well-educated. The fact that many were tutored and home-schooled doesn’t change that (and of course, universities were different animals back then–if our founders could see them, they’d probably want to burn them to the ground). And, many of the founders were farmers, but many were also elite–Washington was elite socially, but was very self-conscious about his “lesser” education. The difference between our remarkable founders and the self-styled elites now is that the founders recognized genuine intellect.
DrMagnolias on February 9, 2010 at 5:12 AM
The entire gab fest was a snark and snob, elitist, self righteous put down celebration.
I felt like I was watching a bunch of Brits, Canadians, or French, gathered together for tea, and blabbering about how unsophisticated those stupid Americans are, and how dumb they are, and how much they are like hicks, and how they don’t wash behind their ears, and how they don’t have any “class,” but that they write notes on small cards or on their hands, rather than depending on a pre-written speech rolling on a TelePrompTer.
This is what the USA is now?
Leftists and those who are thought to be Conservatives or Republicans, like Joe Scarborough, kissing one another’s butts and engaging in “We are soooooo much more classy, sophisticated, and special than that hick trailer park trash, Sarah Palin! I mean, she is such a dunce, she probably thinks that the New York Times is a watch maker. I’ll bet that if you asked her “Who is president of the United States of America,” she’d say, “Bullwinkle the Moose.”
These people are crazy, arrogant, condescending, self righteous, egotistical, and too snobbish for their own good.
That is typical of left wing, liberal, democrat thinkers and Washington insiders. They think this is King Henry the VIII’s court and they are his insiders who get to enjoy the royal treatment and scoff at the peasants.
Talk about Condescension!
William2006 on February 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM
Its Official: AP has begun a new Jihad against Sarah Palin. It must be that during the Wallace interview she had on a pin with the American and Israeli flags.
And as anyone with brain understands, Scarborough is literally dumb a rock
georgealbert on February 9, 2010 at 7:03 AM
I have been enthusiatic about Palin. However as a person who does read extensivly the lack of specifics and details bothers me.
Palin has developed a style as a politician. She can obviously do the details, she did as governor. But in public speaking she avoids details except about energy. She mentions the gas field to be opened is the size of LAX.
Long ago to be se in her ways she decided that getting to the emotional points and generalities serves her better in getting the voters to vote for her. She keeps to that pattern in interviews and Wallace was an example. It was not a hard hitting interview.
Palin deliberately avoids being wonkish.
Her writings though are quite different. More detailed and filled with footnotes.
RAH on February 9, 2010 at 7:34 AM
Make a list of our greatest presidents.
How many of them went to Ivy League schools? None.
How many of them were political insiders? None.
MarkTheGreat on February 9, 2010 at 7:59 AM
I swear… the riff-raff that resides in flyover country are just so… ignorant. Every Hahvahd alum will recall seeing on their freshman syllabus Rumanian offered as a foreign language. “Corpse-man” is Rumanian. It means military medical personnel (enlisted, of course). I know this for a fact because I received a B+ in that class.
CC
CapedConservative on February 9, 2010 at 8:11 AM
Ithought his exchange with her about her not being a very good Analyst was interesting. That question of her was a gotcha question.
Mike, I mean Chris, has his spot secure now with the Elites at his Georgetown cocktail parties after the sit-down.
Roll your eyes Mike…….. you guys are all geniuses in the Beltway.
PappyD61 on February 9, 2010 at 8:24 AM
Andrea Mitchell can write Obama’s name on her hand and then …click here…
mechkiller_k on February 9, 2010 at 8:27 AM
That little stunt by Mitchell painted her as a crude, condescending, malevolent (rhymes with “witch” begins with the letter “B”).
Does anyone remember Andrew Mitchell trying to push her way before the people who were trying to meet Sarah Palin on Sarah’s book tour? Mitchell looked like a hard core, drugged out, burnt out also ran has been who was trying for a gottha moment in that book tour scene.
“Don’t you know who I am? I am Andrea Mitchell. I am the incarnation of Media Elitism!”
Joe Scarborough can quit his job and work as a body language, gesture, and expressions expert.
William2006 on February 9, 2010 at 8:44 AM
Morning Joe is an idiot. Andrea Mitchell is an ugly homely pig. That’s all…….
adamsmith on February 9, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Yeah, she’s not ivy league
bfd
i guess being ivy league gives you some cover when one tries to pursuade the people that high taxes and centralized economic management is a good thing
especially when one doesn’t have look far to see past failures galore with the same plan
true conservatives don’t waste human capital by restricting their ability to invent and perservere
leftists, not so much
SP understands this
Sonosam on February 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM
Chris Wallace. Douchebag pundit
Sarah palin. Selfmade. Reached position of governor of Alaska
Ones a mr.
The others a governor
not surprising the left would like to erode that position
Sonosam on February 9, 2010 at 9:29 AM
The talking heads always say they asked Sarah soft ball questions, when the questions are identical to ones asked of others on all the talk shows. They don’t have any new questions, ever. They all collude on the talking points, too.
Kissmygrits on February 9, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Chris Wallace was grinning because he knew his ratings were going through the roof. His Palin interview, which was well done by Wallace and Palin, earned his highest ratings ever, and beat the three other Sunday morning yak/snore shows. Linky.
james23 on February 9, 2010 at 10:09 AM
As Martin Luther said, “Keep it simple for the simple.”
Dark-Star on February 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM
I’ll take a person with principles over a “serious thinker” for any political position every time.
The problem with “serious thinkers” as politicians is, as Thomas Sowell points out, they know about 1/1000 of what they need to know, but since they are so “serioius”, they think they know more than enough to make, shall we say, radical changes to a 300 million person country. And since they are so “serious”, deep thinking politicians have no real need to pay attention to advisors. After all, they are always the smartest person in the room. They won.
I’d pick Obama over Reagan for the scrabble game or the Risk game, but if the next meal is at stake, I like the person who has principles, provided the principles are the ones that have worked for the last 230 years.
So, I’m obviously a racist.
notagool on February 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM
It wasn’t an ambiguous physical gestures, he probably doesn’t respect her… I don’t either. We need someone serious to run and win in 2012, not Sarah Palin.
Cr4sh Dummy on February 9, 2010 at 11:36 AM
+100
dominigan on February 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM
No ratings Joe apparently just has no respect for women. Remember the stripper pole joke about Jeri Thompson?
flytier on February 9, 2010 at 12:24 PM
I saw it, he definitely rolled his eyes.
kg598301 on February 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM
I’m no Palin-basher, but lately her public pronouncements are eye roll worthy. She’s trotting out the same now-tired little sound bites about the elites, blah, blah blah. Unless she starts coming up with some serious positions and more meaningful things to say that, frankly, are said far better than many others in the party, she should step aside and study up.
redfoxbluestate on February 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM
Palin does, indeed, speak on the most vague generalities. That’s because she was manufactured into a candidate…McCain picked her because she’s A) a woman (Hilary voters, look at me!), and B) she’s attractive (to some).
She proved with her interviews with Couric and Gibson that she was completely ignorant on the issues, and if she’s doing slightly better now, so what? That means she’s hired some expensive coaches to give her talking points for speeches, they’ve crafted her image as folksy and down to earth average soccer mom (avg soccer moms don’t have millions of dollars or a staff as Palin does)…
I agree 100% with Scarborough- there has to be frustration, because she continues to speak in nothing but overly general platitudes, boilerplate talking points, just basic stuff that no one who is conservative would argue with and could come up with on their own. She’s got to have more substance. I just don’t think she possesses it to begin with, and manufacturing a candidate out of whole cloth isn’t easy.
TheBlueSite on February 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2