<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama becoming the National Nanny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~ Defending the Criminal, Or the Victim? &#8212; Addendum to Previous Post &#8216;Progressives are Wired Backwards&#8217; &#171; Critical Political Thinking</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3254589</link>
		<dc:creator>~ Defending the Criminal, Or the Victim? &#8212; Addendum to Previous Post &#8216;Progressives are Wired Backwards&#8217; &#171; Critical Political Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3254589</guid>
		<description>[...] poll shows lowest confidence in Obama policies yet, Stimulus may save or create one job, anyway, Obama becoming the National Nanny, Obama to hold health-care symposium with Republicans, Horror: Gametime Tebow ad features domestic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poll shows lowest confidence in Obama policies yet, Stimulus may save or create one job, anyway, Obama becoming the National Nanny, Obama to hold health-care symposium with Republicans, Horror: Gametime Tebow ad features domestic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama to GOP: Hey, let&#8217;s put aside &#8220;petty politics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3244039</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama to GOP: Hey, let&#8217;s put aside &#8220;petty politics&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3244039</guid>
		<description>[...] interrogations (does that mean Arlen Specter&#8217;s a traitor too?), but this remonstrance from America&#8217;s new Dr. Phil came at the very same presser at which his official mouthpiece goofed lamely on Sarah Palin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interrogations (does that mean Arlen Specter&#8217;s a traitor too?), but this remonstrance from America&#8217;s new Dr. Phil came at the very same presser at which his official mouthpiece goofed lamely on Sarah Palin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justltl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3243847</link>
		<dc:creator>justltl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3243847</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that word spelled N-&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;-n-n-y?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that word spelled N-<strong>i</strong>-n-n-y?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3242632</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3242632</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama can dish it out but he can’t take the heat. Obama doesn’t like to be scolded or critized.

TN Mom on February 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Narcissists cannot handle being criticized.
Their response is to blame, polarize, demonize, &amp; destroy their criticizers.
Narcissists are often extremely evil people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama can dish it out but he can’t take the heat. Obama doesn’t like to be scolded or critized.</p>
<p>TN Mom on February 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Narcissists cannot handle being criticized.<br />
Their response is to blame, polarize, demonize, &amp; destroy their criticizers.<br />
Narcissists are often extremely evil people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241907</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jealous? Uh, no. But a typical response.

Now how about you explain how you don’t have party blinders on.

Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I am not a party zealot. I vote all across the board.
I prefer to keep a mix of parties in power to counter balance each other.
Your typical responses to anyone here are usually always sophomoric &amp; idiotic, having nothing to do with the topic at hand (like your FEMA jab at me here), which is why you took so long to answer my question half-a$$.
You are a spoiled brat. You whine about how we are &#039;too big&#039;, too much power &amp; influence, blah blah blah.
That is jealousy in any book. 
I think the &#039;too big&#039; comment is hilarious. 
You are lucky the American Revolution&#039;s Canadian campaign didn&#039;t work out or you would be a part of this country you see to hate so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jealous? Uh, no. But a typical response.</p>
<p>Now how about you explain how you don’t have party blinders on.</p>
<p>Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not a party zealot. I vote all across the board.<br />
I prefer to keep a mix of parties in power to counter balance each other.<br />
Your typical responses to anyone here are usually always sophomoric &amp; idiotic, having nothing to do with the topic at hand (like your FEMA jab at me here), which is why you took so long to answer my question half-a$$.<br />
You are a spoiled brat. You whine about how we are &#8216;too big&#8217;, too much power &amp; influence, blah blah blah.<br />
That is jealousy in any book.<br />
I think the &#8216;too big&#8217; comment is hilarious.<br />
You are lucky the American Revolution&#8217;s Canadian campaign didn&#8217;t work out or you would be a part of this country you see to hate so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kens</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241816</link>
		<dc:creator>kens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241816</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree. He is becoming the National Overseer admonishing us little people on the plantation to do what he says - - or else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree. He is becoming the National Overseer admonishing us little people on the plantation to do what he says &#8211; - or else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241811</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241811</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama will require you to work. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Except for the 14% who are unemployed due to idiotic Obama administration policies, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Barack Obama will require you to work. </p></blockquote>
<p>Except for the 14% who are unemployed due to idiotic Obama administration policies, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PapaTodd.com &#187; Now Obama Wants to Control School Vending Machines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241735</link>
		<dc:creator>PapaTodd.com &#187; Now Obama Wants to Control School Vending Machines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241735</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil around. A really powerful Dr Phil?  I don&#8217;t think so.  Dr Phil never bitches that he inherited his mess from Dr Laura.   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil around. A really powerful Dr Phil?  I don&#8217;t think so.  Dr Phil never bitches that he inherited his mess from Dr Laura.   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~ In Which I Suggest That the Brains of Progressives Are Wired Backwards (Or, Why You Just Cannot For the Life of You Understand Liberals) &#171; Critical Political Thinking</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241580</link>
		<dc:creator>~ In Which I Suggest That the Brains of Progressives Are Wired Backwards (Or, Why You Just Cannot For the Life of You Understand Liberals) &#171; Critical Political Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241580</guid>
		<description>[...] who’s opposing EPA’s war on carbon now Hot Air: “Green police” ad: good marketing for Audi? Obama becoming the National Nanny Obama to hold health-care symposium with Republicans Horror: Gametime Tebow ad features domestic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who’s opposing EPA’s war on carbon now Hot Air: “Green police” ad: good marketing for Audi? Obama becoming the National Nanny Obama to hold health-care symposium with Republicans Horror: Gametime Tebow ad features domestic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Must Know Headlines 2.9.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241565</link>
		<dc:creator>Must Know Headlines 2.9.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241565</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Becoming The National Nanny   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama Becoming The National Nanny   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241452</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your country’s too big. You will never eliminate enough bureaucracy to your liking. Never. This crybabying about the size of gov’t is conspicuously muted when your party is in power. Why is that? How come you don’t hold them responsible for not downsizing government when they’re the ones holding the conch?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For one thing, we could easily go for &lt;em&gt;weeks&lt;/em&gt; without hearing about George Bush or pretty much anything political unless we actively sought such info.  Unlike Dear Leader President Bush could lead without his mug on the boob tube 24-7, nor did he lecture us on how we should live our lives.  

As for downsizing government, how could the Republicans do that?  Sure, many would not (RINOs we call them), but I still remember the whining from the Leftards back in the &#039;90s when Gingrich and the House Republicans tried to do just that, and also Reagan back in the &#039;80s (not so much the MSM as they were well aware of the &quot;Reagan Democrats&quot; and they were basically afraid of him, but there was a seething hatred of Reagan and Conservatism in general-the TV evangelists/Moral Majority provided the perfect opportunity for an indirect attack on the Reagan/Bush Sr. thing).  

What happens is the Republicans try to cut wasteful spending and entitlement programs and they are excoriated for being racists and not caring about &quot;the poor&quot;, the whales, the snail darters, the flies, the baby fur seals and Gaia in general.  

It&#039;s political poison to take away what millions think is &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; money and programs and having millions more far better off that feel sorry for them and can&#039;t see why the evil rich couldn&#039;t pay just a little bit more whining from the sidelines.

The only wasteful spending as far as the Libtards are concerned is anything spent on national defense or anything that allows individuals and companies who have earned their money to keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your country’s too big. You will never eliminate enough bureaucracy to your liking. Never. This crybabying about the size of gov’t is conspicuously muted when your party is in power. Why is that? How come you don’t hold them responsible for not downsizing government when they’re the ones holding the conch?</p></blockquote>
<p>For one thing, we could easily go for <em>weeks</em> without hearing about George Bush or pretty much anything political unless we actively sought such info.  Unlike Dear Leader President Bush could lead without his mug on the boob tube 24-7, nor did he lecture us on how we should live our lives.  </p>
<p>As for downsizing government, how could the Republicans do that?  Sure, many would not (RINOs we call them), but I still remember the whining from the Leftards back in the &#8217;90s when Gingrich and the House Republicans tried to do just that, and also Reagan back in the &#8217;80s (not so much the MSM as they were well aware of the &#8220;Reagan Democrats&#8221; and they were basically afraid of him, but there was a seething hatred of Reagan and Conservatism in general-the TV evangelists/Moral Majority provided the perfect opportunity for an indirect attack on the Reagan/Bush Sr. thing).  </p>
<p>What happens is the Republicans try to cut wasteful spending and entitlement programs and they are excoriated for being racists and not caring about &#8220;the poor&#8221;, the whales, the snail darters, the flies, the baby fur seals and Gaia in general.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s political poison to take away what millions think is <em>their</em> money and programs and having millions more far better off that feel sorry for them and can&#8217;t see why the evil rich couldn&#8217;t pay just a little bit more whining from the sidelines.</p>
<p>The only wasteful spending as far as the Libtards are concerned is anything spent on national defense or anything that allows individuals and companies who have earned their money to keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhuka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241401</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s our NannyNazi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s our NannyNazi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atheling</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241300</link>
		<dc:creator>atheling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241300</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t forget that we can’t drive those big SUV’s and keep our heat at 65.

DJ from MA on February 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, while he is chauffered around in a big SUV and cranks up the heat to Hawaii temperatures in the White House.

This nanny lecturing crap is another example of what a girly man he is.  Mom pants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don’t forget that we can’t drive those big SUV’s and keep our heat at 65.</p>
<p>DJ from MA on February 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, while he is chauffered around in a big SUV and cranks up the heat to Hawaii temperatures in the White House.</p>
<p>This nanny lecturing crap is another example of what a girly man he is.  Mom pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TN Mom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3241034</link>
		<dc:creator>TN Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3241034</guid>
		<description>Obama can dish it out but he can&#039;t take the heat.  Obama doesn&#039;t like to be scolded or critized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama can dish it out but he can&#8217;t take the heat.  Obama doesn&#8217;t like to be scolded or critized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massrighty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240728</link>
		<dc:creator>massrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240728</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, Lumberg is going to have us come in on Saturday….

nice.

ted c on February 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, Lumberg is going to have us come in on Saturday….</p>
<p>nice.</p>
<p>ted c on February 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrt721</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240706</link>
		<dc:creator>mrt721</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240706</guid>
		<description>mmmm, mmmm, mmmm, Mary Katharine Ham.
I love her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmm, mmmm, mmmm, Mary Katharine Ham.<br />
I love her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgapinoy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240682</link>
		<dc:creator>jgapinoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;At times, having Obama in the Oval Office is like having a really powerful Dr. Phil around.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, Dr. Phil never whines about how much work Dr. Laura left him when he gained pre-eminence, so I’m not sure that analogy works.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I love ya, Ed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At times, having Obama in the Oval Office is like having a really powerful Dr. Phil around.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Well, Dr. Phil never whines about how much work Dr. Laura left him when he gained pre-eminence, so I’m not sure that analogy works.</p></blockquote>
<p>I love ya, Ed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240651</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240651</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;    Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 1:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, Mrs. Reagan was TALKING TO KIDS! President Obama talks to us like we are kids.

txhsmom on February 8, 2010 at 2:10 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Straight to the heart of the issue.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with acting like a nanny, when you &lt;em&gt;are &lt;/em&gt;a nanny.  But when dealing with adults, not children, treat them as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>    Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 1:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, Mrs. Reagan was TALKING TO KIDS! President Obama talks to us like we are kids.</p>
<p>txhsmom on February 8, 2010 at 2:10 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Straight to the heart of the issue.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with acting like a nanny, when you <em>are </em>a nanny.  But when dealing with adults, not children, treat them as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240624</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240624</guid>
		<description>This should be no surprise to anyone who heard Michelle Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjljYjA3YTYzMjU2ZjA5Yzg1MmM2YjIzZjEyN2ZjZjk=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;speak about her husband&lt;/a&gt; during the campaign:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. &lt;strong&gt;Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual&lt;/strong&gt;, uninvolved, uninformed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Emphasis mine.  Sounds just like a National Nanny, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be no surprise to anyone who heard Michelle Obama <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjljYjA3YTYzMjU2ZjA5Yzg1MmM2YjIzZjEyN2ZjZjk=" rel="nofollow">speak about her husband</a> during the campaign:</p>
<blockquote><p>Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. <strong>Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual</strong>, uninvolved, uninformed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Emphasis mine.  Sounds just like a National Nanny, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentWatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240574</link>
		<dc:creator>SilentWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240574</guid>
		<description>She didn&#039;t tell us, though, that Barack is both uninvolved and uninformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She didn&#8217;t tell us, though, that Barack is both uninvolved and uninformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentWatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240573</link>
		<dc:creator>SilentWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240573</guid>
		<description>Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/20/messiahs-wife-barack-will-never-allow-you-to-go-back-to-your-lives-as-usual-uninvolved-uninformed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michelle Obama&lt;/a&gt; did tell us that &quot;Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.&quot;

She did tell us the man is a pain-in-the-ass nag. The sensible amongst us listened and refused to vote for him. The morons inflicted him on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/20/messiahs-wife-barack-will-never-allow-you-to-go-back-to-your-lives-as-usual-uninvolved-uninformed/" rel="nofollow">Michelle Obama</a> did tell us that &#8220;Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.&#8221;</p>
<p>She did tell us the man is a pain-in-the-ass nag. The sensible amongst us listened and refused to vote for him. The morons inflicted him on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240208</link>
		<dc:creator>bayam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240208</guid>
		<description>Obama’s problem isn’t just that he acts like a nanny; it’s that his rhetoric makes clear the direction he wants to take the US

All I can say is that I hope he goes into full bitch mode when the NFL and player&#039;s union fail to renew the salary cap agreement which has kept the game great for the last 10 plus years.  Without someone pounding the bully pulpit, the NFL will destroy itself, turning into a pimping competition that ruins the small franchises like Minnesota and New Orleans. 

Teddy Roosevelt was also known to loudly voice his opinions and scold the public, yet the country didn&#039;t turn into a socialist paradise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama’s problem isn’t just that he acts like a nanny; it’s that his rhetoric makes clear the direction he wants to take the US</p>
<p>All I can say is that I hope he goes into full bitch mode when the NFL and player&#8217;s union fail to renew the salary cap agreement which has kept the game great for the last 10 plus years.  Without someone pounding the bully pulpit, the NFL will destroy itself, turning into a pimping competition that ruins the small franchises like Minnesota and New Orleans. </p>
<p>Teddy Roosevelt was also known to loudly voice his opinions and scold the public, yet the country didn&#8217;t turn into a socialist paradise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PappyD61</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3240003</link>
		<dc:creator>PappyD61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3240003</guid>
		<description>Well duh.....shouldn&#039;t the Caliph (just curious has he found a church in DC yet?) be able to decide what his slaves do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well duh&#8230;..shouldn&#8217;t the Caliph (just curious has he found a church in DC yet?) be able to decide what his slaves do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWforFreedom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3239890</link>
		<dc:creator>CWforFreedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3239890</guid>
		<description>I can see it now....liberals charge that Ham called mid-westerners hicks.

-------


Davey my boy---   what about those that did complain about large government under Bush? What about those Americans that will get stuck paying for this. Whether they were loud or not this spending is just crazy. Is something right or wrong based on the criticism it receivers or rather on its own merits. That argument is getting tired.

BTW early in Bush&#039;s first term I warned that he was not a conservative and many castigated me. No go back under your rock Canuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see it now&#8230;.liberals charge that Ham called mid-westerners hicks.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Davey my boy&#8212;   what about those that did complain about large government under Bush? What about those Americans that will get stuck paying for this. Whether they were loud or not this spending is just crazy. Is something right or wrong based on the criticism it receivers or rather on its own merits. That argument is getting tired.</p>
<p>BTW early in Bush&#8217;s first term I warned that he was not a conservative and many castigated me. No go back under your rock Canuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderlust</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/08/obama-becoming-the-national-nanny/comment-page-3/#comment-3239799</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderlust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80985#comment-3239799</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a very clear track record of agreeing with Hotair on what you would consider a surprising number of things. Bye bye now.

Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Damn, here I thought drywall was leaving. But you can’t keep your stupid mouth shut, can ya, Davey?

Hey a$$hole, I am a US citizen who has dual citizenship (US/NZ) and currently lives in Australia (I am about to get permanent residency here in Oz). I think from my travels over the years that I appreciate much more than you the role US politics has in world affairs. Yet you never see me whining about it.

Wonder why?

&lt;strong&gt;Oh, that’s right, it’s because &lt;em&gt;I am a US citizen and I get to vote in US elections&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;

When you get the privilege to vote in the US, drywall, only then can you rightfully have a say in US politics.

Until then, f*ck off already, idiot…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have a very clear track record of agreeing with Hotair on what you would consider a surprising number of things. Bye bye now.</p>
<p>Dave Rywall on February 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Damn, here I thought drywall was leaving. But you can’t keep your stupid mouth shut, can ya, Davey?</p>
<p>Hey a$$hole, I am a US citizen who has dual citizenship (US/NZ) and currently lives in Australia (I am about to get permanent residency here in Oz). I think from my travels over the years that I appreciate much more than you the role US politics has in world affairs. Yet you never see me whining about it.</p>
<p>Wonder why?</p>
<p><strong>Oh, that’s right, it’s because <em>I am a US citizen and I get to vote in US elections</em>.</strong></p>
<p>When you get the privilege to vote in the US, drywall, only then can you rightfully have a say in US politics.</p>
<p>Until then, f*ck off already, idiot…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
