Didn’t Chuckles Johnson of Little Green something-or-other spend most of last summer insisting that Luap Nor was *behind* the Tea Parties?

Couldn’t mean Chuckles was mistaken, now could it?

Mew

“Be wooed by the Left and by the Right, Patriots knowing full well we have a new direction in mind for America that is neither Left or Right.
Our Direction Is Forward, with the Constitution as our map, and His Word as our Light and Compass.” Steve@giveusliberty

No more Republicrats.

Teaparty = WE THE PEOPLE = the Constitution of the United States.

Exit question: If not even Ron Paul’s safe from tea party challenges, who is? Palin, and probably Marco Rubio, and … who else?

Answer: No one. Even Palin and Rubio are not, in fact, “safe.” Should either of them ever reveal themselves to have statist impulses, I assure you that even we loyal Tea Partiers would turn on them. I adore Palin, but I’m wary of all politicians, even her, because I know that it is natural for them to gradually allow for more and more state control in the interests of promoting conservative policies.

Interestingly, I do believe Ron Paul to be a genuine Libertarian, but I happen to think his brand leans too far toward Anarchy. I may not be keen on big government, but I know that I’d rather have a well-organized, well-funded army defending my family than be stuck doing it myself (which is not to say I wouldn’t defend my family, only that I’m more effective with my country standing with me).

I think most Tea Partiers are a lot more “moderate” – in the genuine and not leftist sense of the word – than they are portrayed. They understand, for instance, that ideological uniformity is neither possible nor desirable in a republic like America, which is why they understand the benefit of supporting a candidate like Scott Brown, who may not necessarily agree with them on all points. If we don’t support Ron Paul, it’s not because we’re ideologically inconsistent, but because we understand his brand of conservatism to be ineffective in the current political climate.

I was pleasantly surprised to see my Tea Party was filled not with Paulastinians but people who understood the threat Jihadism as well as Marxism.

we have a group of CLFers, Campaign for Liberty,worming their way into Republican groups here in Oakland County MI. Wonder where else they are trying to do this?

Bullhead on February 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty is very active in San Francisco, CA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbkwdT6Erm8

The Ron Paul people were also relatively successful in taking over the Republican Central Committee in Alameda County, CA.
And a Google search will show the trouble they have caused for the Republican party in Florida.

The Campaign for Liberty is also running several candidates for office in 2010.

See the right side of the page on http://www.dailypaul.com/ for a list of the candidates Ron Paul is supporting so far.

Wake up Republicans!

Your hero worship of a blogger is interesting. I bet you watch hollywood award shows on tv also.
peacenprosperity on February 9, 2010 at 9:20 AM

Your comments are not interesting, but they are stunningly stupid. Because I take issue with your overwrought statement about Allah being a member of the ‘self-annointed media elite’ I am a “hero worshipper”? Oh well, Allah will not doubt be flattered to be put in the category of “heroes”. Meanwhile, I’ll be on the alert for any “hero worship” of Sarah Palin on your part.

…Does finding a motive mean sympathy for that attack? NO! When police look for motive in a murder case, does that mean that they are sympathetic to the murderer? I don’t think so…

RightXBrigade on February 9, 2010 at 12:19 PM

But it took RP only several minutes to read the AQ talking points and tell us, unequivocally, that the underwear bomber tried what he did because of the US bombing in Yemen.

He wasn’t looking for motive, he believed AQ’s press release… and was proven wrong… the guy bought his ticket a day before the Yemen bombing.

And now OBL/AQ is claiming that the US should be attacked because of AGW… should be ratify Kyoto and pass Cap and Tax so they don’t bomb us on that pretext?

He believes, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, that that the terrorists would stop attacking us if we weren’t occupying their countries. This is in spite of the fact that we weren’t occupying anyone on 9/11.

There will always be islamic terrorists who want to kill anyone who is not Muslim, I agree. However, there is such thing as blowback and I am stunned by how many people think it is unpatriotic to find a motive in terrorist attacks. Does finding a motive mean sympathy for that attack? NO! When police look for motive in a murder case, does that mean that they are sympathetic to the murderer? I don’t think so. These nutbag terrorists will find any reason to attack us. We have military presence on the arabian peninsula, sure, it was sanctioned by the oppressive Saudi Government but have you noticed, most arabs HATE the Saudi family. Like I said, we don’t need to be in these shithole countries. It’s hot, the people are crazy and it’s hot! Again, F Em!

So do you think the war on terror is a fiction or something? Or are you merely saying that trying to change other countries is not effective and that we should just kill all the terrorists we can within a certain withdrawal timetable and leave it at that?

I’m saying that we did what we wanted in Afghanistan. We went in, ousted the Taliban who were giving asylum to Al-Qaeda. Why are we still there? Nation building DOES NOT work with these countries and these backwards people. I’ve been over there multiple times already. We are accomplishing nothing, the Rules of Engagement tie our hands to get whatever job we may have done. It is a mess. These people do not deserve our help. We need to worry about our own countrymen and getting ourselves out of all this debt. Worrying about the plight of the Afghan is not my concern and shouldn’t be our country’s concern. Let them murder each other all they want. Not our problem. And the minute some country wants to harbor terrorists who commit an attack on us? Let the country glow green for 100 years.

his foreign policy is obviously a major issue, but unless I missed a memo, there’s no concrete foreign policy (i.e. isolationist vs. interventionist) that’s been settled on by a majority of tea partiers.

Paul is seen as a Paulnut on foreign policy! So far out on the fringe, he’s disqualified himself. I’m sure Allah can find a tea-party guy we’ve never heard of to disagree, but that doesn’t ring true with this tea-partier.

Good for you. Paul and his followers are gutless moral cowards, parasites on the sacrifices that much better men (and by that I include honest traitors like Benedict Arnold) have made on behalf of their freedom.

Rebar on February 9, 2010 at 11:31 AM

Yep, the Rockwell racists and League of the South leeches can all go hang as far as I’m concerned.

Francis Parker Yockey, Jr. and his droids should drop dead and rot.

I didn’t care for Paul’s focus during that meeting, he seemed more interested in talking about his efforts to audit the Fed, which I suppose might be a good idea, and most people were there because of their concerns about the huge bank bailouts, and the porkulous bill.

In any event, Ron Paul’s position on foreign policy is stupid, and I will vote for Tim Grainey in the March Primary.

http://www.graneyforcongress.com/

He hypocritically proclaims that he’s “pro-life,” yet he loves and supports the postpartum murder of Israeli children by the freedom-hating terrorist hellfilth.

ebrown2 on February 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM

Paul and his cults motto – “liberty for me, not for thee”.

This clip alone eviscerates Paul and his lunatic followers.

Yep, that’s the essence of all Paulfilthery right there.

One can only honestly condemn these breaches by the FF’s by genuinely believing in liberty and human dignity for all.

The Paulfilth can’t and don’t want to.

They’re either racist hellfilth, ignorant fools, or both.

No excuses justify their embrace of a man who’s ugly no matter the angle you look at him, inside or out.

So does ex-Florida resident, Joe “the CINO” Scarbag from Morning Joe. Same guy?

Maybe AP was the guy I saw on Cash Cab yesterday who was with some crazy old lady who could not help but make a negative remark toward GW Bush (accused him of being a conscientious objector).

I was tickled to see them lose it all and get kicked to the curb.

As far as Ron Paul and his Paulhroids, I say again, Space Aliens committed 911. It is a more plausible explanation than saying that our fellow Americans committed it.

Yet more proof of his lying Nazi-loving evil.

He hypocritically proclaims that he’s “pro-life,” yet he loves and supports the postpartum murder of Israeli children by the freedom-hating terrorist hellfilth.

another thing to watch about Paul is his Moral Relativism, something that the Right needs nothing to do with. He does it in the realm of Foreign Policy ‘thinking’. See his talking points about “how would we FEEL if CHINA was building Military bases here…”

Which pressuposes alot of stupidity within itself, but at its root its assuming China and the USA are on the same moral playing field, both equal beacons of Human Rights.