Oh, yes, Palin needs to be examined, veddy veddy carefully…she could have been sooooo dangerous to this country as VP…God only knows what would happen to this great land if she were President! Brrrr…I shudder at the thought!!!

LMAO

Sapwolf on February 7, 2010 at 7:56 PM

She seemed a little off in her delivery. Was there feedback or something going on with her monitor? She was speaking like someone who calls into a talk show and hears the delay on the radio. Thanks for that perspective.

ernesto on February 6, 2010 at 10:41 PM

Good point. But if Sarah stays as the right’s cheerleader (no insult intended), then who should run for POTUS?

Dark-Star on February 6, 2010 at 10:47 PM

Excellent point. Since there is nobody else we can trust to actually attempt to reduce the federal government, she WILL run.

Wonderful and strong speech. I think this is the start of her presidential campaign. There is no doubt she is running for president, and I will support her if she does.

cubachi on February 6, 2010 at 10:41 PM

I believe she is and will announce in response to her supporters asking her to run.

I handed off my folded up 3′ by 5′ Gadsden flag (don’t tread on me) to Jason Recher when he walked by asking him to give it as a gift to Piper and Trig. Piper was sitting on the other side of the speaker.

Andrew Breibart was great the whole conference. A real Beckish warrior for our side.

Conference was a success. The only issue I had was lack of available wireless internet in the conf. area.

And for those that are curious, yes, my poster of Sarah attached to the balcony outside my hotel room DID make the cover of the New York Times yesterday.

When have we had a “losing” VP nominee the year after the election command that much national attention AND have growing popularity at the same time? I can’t remember that in my lifetime.

karenhasfreedom on February 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM

But…but…she’s Dan Quayle in heels! LOL *sarcasm, of course*

There’s nothing on her hands you pathetic mouthbreather.
Liberals are beyond pathetic. Your time is over loser. Sarah Palin has made each and every one of your kind forever irrelevant.
gary4205 on February 7, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Where to begin, except to start with the indisputable fact that you are an ignoramus. I am not anything even approaching a “liberal” and my first comment on this thread was to call out the Associated Press for their biased account of Palin’s appearance at the Tea Party convention.

Moreover, beneath the AP logo, one can clearly see scribbling. Some of you are using “screenshots” in a silly attempt to prove some vast conspiracy, even though a screenshot is of reduced resolution from a photo.

I suggest you get yourself some glasses to correct your vision problem. I have no advice for your stupidity. We can only hope for a miracle.

I much prefer talking points to pointless talking.

Meremortal on February 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Excellent line!

QOTD

Liberals are beyond pathetic. Your time is over loser. Sarah Palin has made each and every one of your kind forever irrelevant.

gary4205 on February 7, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Actually, There is.

HuffPo is used an AP photo, more of which can be found here. See # 100206012427 (4th blue background photo). Scribbles are visible beneath the AP logo.

Buy Danish on February 7, 2010 at 12:26 PM

There’s nothing on her hands you pathetic mouthbreather.

Liberals are beyond pathetic. Your time is over loser. Sarah Palin has made each and every one of your kind forever irrelevant.

here is a head’s up on the teleprompter thingie. Hotels charge a FORTUNE for AV equipment. I used to give a LOT of speeches in front of groups, anywhere from 50 to one time I was in the old Dallas Mavericks arena and gave a speech to 15,000 people (that one was only 10 minutes, though, my others were usually 40 minute lectures or 3 hour workshops). Hotels also charge a fortune for dinner banquets. I am sure a teleprompter would have broken the bank at that convention and the ticket prices were already pretty high as it were. Sarah had a pile of pages that she took to the podium. Whether it was the full speech written out or just bullet points, who cares? Since we knew she had pages on the podium, what does it matter if she did or did not have anything written on her hands. That doesn’t make sense to me.

I found it very much easier to use bullet points in large font on pages and then speak the paragraphs on the bullet point topic without a scripted prose written down, when I gave speeches. I think Sarah did that last night. Sometimes it is easy to go off on a slight tangent and then have to snap back to the points you want to make. I think I saw that maybe a couple of times in 45 minutes. With her passion on what is going on in America, I bet she could have given that speech over 3 hours, we just go the cliff’s notes because it was supposed to be 45 minutes.

The left can’t stand that not only did she hit the ball out of the park last night, she had substance, she slayed O’s policies, slayed Joe on “transparency”, and she had hundreds of media people there covering her speech.

When have we had a “losing” VP nominee the year after the election command that much national attention AND have growing popularity at the same time? I can’t remember that in my lifetime.

They hate her because she is so effective and they know it.

You go girl, The cuda rocks!!

You Lie!

Among the other right wing talking points Sarah Palin hammered in her $100,000 Tea Party Convention speech: that Obama uses a teleprompter.

I know. The horror. Only a commie would use such an infernal device, right? Why, I’ll betcha that no politician ever used one before Obama was elected!

Palin can proudly say she’s teleprompter-free, though. Because she just writes her crib notes on the palm of her hand with a ball point pen.

But no teleprompter! [winkies]

Irrational dishonest man writes irrational and dishonest post. SOWWY CHUCKLES!

Meremortal on February 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Nothin’ but crickets for 30 minutes!

It is no surprise that leftys can’t stand Palin, she is a righty. What is interesting is that leftys rarely take on her core beliefs but rather her supposed imperfections in intelligence and experience. I love to see this agreement between Palin and Obama:

Palin releases all her education, birth and medical records and Obama does the same. I’m not scared, are you leftys OK with the idea?

His messages are all over the map. Just no center.

Sarah, on the other hand, is the same message as in her election campaign.

Amazing difference in message content.

AnninCA on February 7, 2010 at 10:02 AM

Interesting. I often hear similar sentiment from the leftists, who despair that they can’t get their act together in terms of a coherent message.

Yes, because she’s acting. Don’t you get it?

Grow Fins on February 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Oh please. Some degree of acting is a requirement for any serious political campaign or politically-oriented speech. Even if said ‘acting’ is only necessary to keep one from going tongue-tied or looking like a flaming demagogue, which isn’t very good for building support.

200 people.

Grow Fins on February 7, 2010 at 11:15 AM

Heh. How do you know they’re people — did you ever eat with them?

Your turn, Mr. Fins.

unclesmrgol on February 6, 2010 at 2:14 PM

Don’t confuse GF with evidence.

Disturb the Universe on February 6, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Yes, because she’s acting. Don’t you get it?

Grow Fins on February 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Ah, but we have yet to see any of her promises have an expiration date.

And why this fixation with supposed actors anyway? Ronald Reagan did quite well as President, because he knew when to use his acting skills to enforce the truth. Palin is no different.