<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breitbart, Farah argue Birtherism at Tea Party convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;birther&#8217; issue isn&#8217;t going away &#124; The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-7/#comment-4515060</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8216;birther&#8217; issue isn&#8217;t going away &#124; The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-4515060</guid>
		<description>[...] does not mean mainstream conservatives are advocating this position (you may recall, in the past, conservatives like Andrew Breitbart have tangled with Farah over the &#8220;birther&#8221; issue) &#8212; but it might imply that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does not mean mainstream conservatives are advocating this position (you may recall, in the past, conservatives like Andrew Breitbart have tangled with Farah over the &#8220;birther&#8221; issue) &#8212; but it might imply that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tea Party Convention and the emerging permanent Democratic majority &#124; The Unalienable Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-7/#comment-4218620</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tea Party Convention and the emerging permanent Democratic majority &#124; The Unalienable Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-4218620</guid>
		<description>[...] to this account, Andrew Breitbart was at the convention, and forcefully argued against the birthers. So there was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to this account, Andrew Breitbart was at the convention, and forcefully argued against the birthers. So there was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Radosh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-7/#comment-3547703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Radosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3547703</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Frank Rich: An Embarrassment to the New York Times...&lt;/strong&gt;

In Sunday’s New York Times, its far-left shotgun columnist Frank Rich has written a column with the title “The Axis of the Obsessed and Deranged,” which is ironic, since the title so well describes most of his own articles! In a paper whose editors thi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Frank Rich: An Embarrassment to the New York Times&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In Sunday’s New York Times, its far-left shotgun columnist Frank Rich has written a column with the title “The Axis of the Obsessed and Deranged,” which is ironic, since the title so well describes most of his own articles! In a paper whose editors thi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Credit Birthers for GOP Gains &#124; FrumForum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-7/#comment-3354380</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Credit Birthers for GOP Gains &#124; FrumForum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3354380</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey today: Breitbart is entirely correct, and perhaps even understated the case.  In the earlier exchange [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey today: Breitbart is entirely correct, and perhaps even understated the case.  In the earlier exchange [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is Eligible to Serve and ‘Birthers’ are Vindicated? &#8211; The BOPAC Report &#171; &#8220;The BOPAC Report&#8221; &#38; Larry Sinclair&#8217;s Allegations &#8211; ZachJonesIsHome</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-7/#comment-3242899</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama is Eligible to Serve and ‘Birthers’ are Vindicated? &#8211; The BOPAC Report &#171; &#8220;The BOPAC Report&#8221; &#38; Larry Sinclair&#8217;s Allegations &#8211; ZachJonesIsHome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3242899</guid>
		<description>[...] of us who care deeply about the Constitution and the rule of law to turn away based solely upon political calculations.  Something has to be added to the calculation to tip the scales. If real journalists could find [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of us who care deeply about the Constitution and the rule of law to turn away based solely upon political calculations.  Something has to be added to the calculation to tip the scales. If real journalists could find [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizarro No. 1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3240251</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizarro No. 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3240251</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/

Decider on February 8, 2010 at 9:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nice, relevant response!

How do you like the direction your Messiah&#039;s approval numbers are moving, btw? Heckuva of job there, 0bama! It&#039;s a shame all those Independents, who once supported him but now are fleeing from him, have turned out to be such racists, eh?

I know this will be very easy to for a genius like you to understand, but being interested in why so much of 0bamessiah&#039;s past is obscured the way it is isn&#039;t fringe. But, even then, I realize your side wisely concerns itself with much more important topics like Palin&#039;s tanning bed instead, and properly disregards relatively unimportant ones like near-Vice President Edward&#039;s personal drama. You know, the guy you believed was somehow qualified for Pres, while Palin isn&#039;t. Scooped by the National Enquirer? LOL

You guys are great! Please, continue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/" rel="nofollow">http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/</a></p>
<p>Decider on February 8, 2010 at 9:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice, relevant response!</p>
<p>How do you like the direction your Messiah&#8217;s approval numbers are moving, btw? Heckuva of job there, 0bama! It&#8217;s a shame all those Independents, who once supported him but now are fleeing from him, have turned out to be such racists, eh?</p>
<p>I know this will be very easy to for a genius like you to understand, but being interested in why so much of 0bamessiah&#8217;s past is obscured the way it is isn&#8217;t fringe. But, even then, I realize your side wisely concerns itself with much more important topics like Palin&#8217;s tanning bed instead, and properly disregards relatively unimportant ones like near-Vice President Edward&#8217;s personal drama. You know, the guy you believed was somehow qualified for Pres, while Palin isn&#8217;t. Scooped by the National Enquirer? LOL</p>
<p>You guys are great! Please, continue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3240051</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3240051</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What hospital was he born in?
patriotparty1 on February 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He was born in the &lt;strike&gt;Queens&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;Kapiolani&lt;/strike&gt; ... all right, I give up.

My two leading theories - call them &quot;Birther&quot; if you must:

1. He was the first documented case of &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/26/quotes-of-the-day-125/comment-page-7/#comment-2480658&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Multiple Live Births&lt;/a&gt;, born in two Honolulu hospitals at once (though if this is true they&#039;ve gone to great lengths to hush this up);

2. He, being the One, was born in a manger.

This manger would have been located somewhere within the city limits of Honolulu, being that that&#039;s what city is listed on his COLB.

As stated in the link I had been leaning toward #1 in the past, but now -- given the lack of corroborating witnesses at &lt;em&gt;either&lt;/em&gt; hospital who saw either the baby Barry or his mother on or around August 4th 1961 -- I am inclined to say he was mid-wifed at an undisclosed location.

Undisclosed presumably because the itinerant innkeepers who lent the Obamas the use of their manger knew he was the One, knew that one day throngs and flocks would seek out his birthplace, and did not want their property turned into a cheap tourist attraction.

There&#039;s also a third option which I didn&#039;t present above, since it&#039;s a bit Heisen-buggy:

3. A random number generator tied to a coin-toss picking his birth location from the hospital pair (Queens, Kapiolani).  With no guarantees that as you try to narrow it down you can actually pinpoint the location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What hospital was he born in?<br />
patriotparty1 on February 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>He was born in the <strike>Queens</strike> <strike>Kapiolani</strike> &#8230; all right, I give up.</p>
<p>My two leading theories &#8211; call them &#8220;Birther&#8221; if you must:</p>
<p>1. He was the first documented case of <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/26/quotes-of-the-day-125/comment-page-7/#comment-2480658" rel="nofollow">Multiple Live Births</a>, born in two Honolulu hospitals at once (though if this is true they&#8217;ve gone to great lengths to hush this up);</p>
<p>2. He, being the One, was born in a manger.</p>
<p>This manger would have been located somewhere within the city limits of Honolulu, being that that&#8217;s what city is listed on his COLB.</p>
<p>As stated in the link I had been leaning toward #1 in the past, but now &#8212; given the lack of corroborating witnesses at <em>either</em> hospital who saw either the baby Barry or his mother on or around August 4th 1961 &#8212; I am inclined to say he was mid-wifed at an undisclosed location.</p>
<p>Undisclosed presumably because the itinerant innkeepers who lent the Obamas the use of their manger knew he was the One, knew that one day throngs and flocks would seek out his birthplace, and did not want their property turned into a cheap tourist attraction.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a third option which I didn&#8217;t present above, since it&#8217;s a bit Heisen-buggy:</p>
<p>3. A random number generator tied to a coin-toss picking his birth location from the hospital pair (Queens, Kapiolani).  With no guarantees that as you try to narrow it down you can actually pinpoint the location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hawkins: Birtherism a &#8220;Winning&#8221; Issue? &#124; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3239245</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hawkins: Birtherism a &#8220;Winning&#8221; Issue? &#124; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3239245</guid>
		<description>[...] an argument at the Nashville Tea Party Convention about the birther issue. Not a shock there. But, something Joseph Farah said needs to be rebutted: I told Farah that his speech was getting negative attention already, and that Breitbart, who’d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an argument at the Nashville Tea Party Convention about the birther issue. Not a shock there. But, something Joseph Farah said needs to be rebutted: I told Farah that his speech was getting negative attention already, and that Breitbart, who’d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birtherism Is A Winning Political Issue? Gimmie A Break! &#124; Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3238243</link>
		<dc:creator>Birtherism Is A Winning Political Issue? Gimmie A Break! &#124; Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3238243</guid>
		<description>[...] an argument at the Nashville Tea Party Convention about the birther issue. Not a shock there. But, something Joseph Farah said needs to be rebutted:I told Farah that his speech was getting negative attention already, and that Breitbart, who’d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an argument at the Nashville Tea Party Convention about the birther issue. Not a shock there. But, something Joseph Farah said needs to be rebutted:I told Farah that his speech was getting negative attention already, and that Breitbart, who’d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Keynote Speech at National Tea Party Convention &#124; Jeffrey A. Setaro</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3238218</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Keynote Speech at National Tea Party Convention &#124; Jeffrey A. Setaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3238218</guid>
		<description>[...] Breitbart, Farah argue Birtherism at Tea Party convention &#8211; Ed Morrissey, Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Breitbart, Farah argue Birtherism at Tea Party convention &#8211; Ed Morrissey, Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firepilot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237880</link>
		<dc:creator>firepilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237880</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How did he get into paaakistaan as he says with an American passport, when we could not travel there then? It was a British coloney and his father a citizen which makes him a duel British/American citizen. When did he renounce his British citizenship? If he did not, he still is and therefore is NOT natural born. He is not natural born because his father WAS NOT a citizen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

See above. we have the mythical, but untrue Pakistan travel ban, we have someone now claiming Pakistan was a British colony at that time too, but that ended in 1947, and a claim that Barack is now a British citizen too.   Thats a new one.   I thought Barack had Kenyan citizenship, or was it Indonesian too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How did he get into paaakistaan as he says with an American passport, when we could not travel there then? It was a British coloney and his father a citizen which makes him a duel British/American citizen. When did he renounce his British citizenship? If he did not, he still is and therefore is NOT natural born. He is not natural born because his father WAS NOT a citizen.</p></blockquote>
<p>See above. we have the mythical, but untrue Pakistan travel ban, we have someone now claiming Pakistan was a British colony at that time too, but that ended in 1947, and a claim that Barack is now a British citizen too.   Thats a new one.   I thought Barack had Kenyan citizenship, or was it Indonesian too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firepilot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237856</link>
		<dc:creator>firepilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237856</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;firepilot, you do remember the whole “John-McCain-prove-your-citizenship” thing in Congress a couple of years ago, right? It was hard to miss…

-Aslan’s Girl

Aslans Girl &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I remember Congress quickly writing a law to take any ambiguity out of it, and to ensure that he would be eligible.  Sorry, but this birther allegation that there was this big challenge in the Senate where Jchn McCain had to prove himself, is again utterly false.

So how are we supposed to take you birthers seriously, when you all make up things like John McCain having to prove his citizenship, or the non-existent Pakistan travel ban, or that his mom could renounce his citizenship, or that a foriegn country canceled his US citizenship, all of those are completely not true.  

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/02/29/obama_backs_law_to_ensure_mcca.html

&quot;The McCaskill bill, submitted immediately after she scrawled it onto a notepad on the Senate floor in response to the Times story, would establish the eligibility of anyone born to a U.S. citizen who is serving overseas as an active or reserve member of the U.S. armed forces. The Arizona senator&#039;s father was a Navy officer serving in the Canal Zone when McCain was born there in 1936.

&quot;Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party&#039;s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign,&quot; Obama said.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>firepilot, you do remember the whole “John-McCain-prove-your-citizenship” thing in Congress a couple of years ago, right? It was hard to miss…</p>
<p>-Aslan’s Girl</p>
<p>Aslans Girl </p></blockquote>
<p>I remember Congress quickly writing a law to take any ambiguity out of it, and to ensure that he would be eligible.  Sorry, but this birther allegation that there was this big challenge in the Senate where Jchn McCain had to prove himself, is again utterly false.</p>
<p>So how are we supposed to take you birthers seriously, when you all make up things like John McCain having to prove his citizenship, or the non-existent Pakistan travel ban, or that his mom could renounce his citizenship, or that a foriegn country canceled his US citizenship, all of those are completely not true.  </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/02/29/obama_backs_law_to_ensure_mcca.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/02/29/obama_backs_law_to_ensure_mcca.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The McCaskill bill, submitted immediately after she scrawled it onto a notepad on the Senate floor in response to the Times story, would establish the eligibility of anyone born to a U.S. citizen who is serving overseas as an active or reserve member of the U.S. armed forces. The Arizona senator&#8217;s father was a Navy officer serving in the Canal Zone when McCain was born there in 1936.</p>
<p>&#8220;Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party&#8217;s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign,&#8221; Obama said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Laskie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Laskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237737</guid>
		<description>When you convert to Islam you get an Islamic name Barrak Hussian Obama is his Muslim name. It is legal.  I say we shut up about where he was born, and let the Democrats make it an issue. Its a Democratic political dirty trick to confuse the issues. I have concluded its a red herring to distract us from the real issues. Any way I don&#039;t think we want to go down that road, because it will led to civil war.  The reason he won&#039;t show his school records is that he is stupid, and school records are proof of that. We can win on other issues. Later when we are in power we can have an investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you convert to Islam you get an Islamic name Barrak Hussian Obama is his Muslim name. It is legal.  I say we shut up about where he was born, and let the Democrats make it an issue. Its a Democratic political dirty trick to confuse the issues. I have concluded its a red herring to distract us from the real issues. Any way I don&#8217;t think we want to go down that road, because it will led to civil war.  The reason he won&#8217;t show his school records is that he is stupid, and school records are proof of that. We can win on other issues. Later when we are in power we can have an investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotparty1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237609</link>
		<dc:creator>patriotparty1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237609</guid>
		<description>We have never asked a president for proof before because their history could be traced.  Obama provides NOTHING!  Where is his childhood home?  He has not told us.  His father WAS NOT a US citizen which gives him atuomatically duel citizenship.  No other president grew up in a foreign, muslim country!  No other president has spent millions COVERING UP his history, college records, grades, friends, and has no traceable papers though they say they were the president of the Harvard Law Review.  Where is his college thesis?  Everyone says he is so smart, what was his SAT, LSTAT scores?  What is his IQ?  Where are the pictures of his house?  What hospital was he born in?  Where is the apartment he and his father and mother lived in?  

How did he get into paaakistaan as he says with an American passport, when we could not travel there then?  It was a British coloney and his father a citizen which makes him a duel British/American citizen.  When did he renounce his British citizenship?  If he did not, he still is and therefore is NOT natural born.  He is not natural born because his father WAS NOT a citizen.  

Why could I call the Hawaiian hewspaper and place a birth announcement for anyone I want to?  His mother and grandmother placed the announcement because he WAS NOT a citizen and they had to establish his birth in order to receive benefits for him.  How did his mother arrive in Washington state to registar for and start school only a few weeks after Obama was born?  How was that possible in those days when there were no flights from Hawaii to the mainland.

Why is it proven that his father lived by himself in an apartment close to his school and not with them?

If he was legally Sortero, how did his name become Obama and how is that a legal name and not an alias?  Why has the Illinois bar never prosecuted him for lying on his paperwork that he used no other names when he clearly has at least 3 names he has used?  What is his name?  How is a natural born citizen named Barry Sortero now Barrak Obama and that is legal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have never asked a president for proof before because their history could be traced.  Obama provides NOTHING!  Where is his childhood home?  He has not told us.  His father WAS NOT a US citizen which gives him atuomatically duel citizenship.  No other president grew up in a foreign, muslim country!  No other president has spent millions COVERING UP his history, college records, grades, friends, and has no traceable papers though they say they were the president of the Harvard Law Review.  Where is his college thesis?  Everyone says he is so smart, what was his SAT, LSTAT scores?  What is his IQ?  Where are the pictures of his house?  What hospital was he born in?  Where is the apartment he and his father and mother lived in?  </p>
<p>How did he get into paaakistaan as he says with an American passport, when we could not travel there then?  It was a British coloney and his father a citizen which makes him a duel British/American citizen.  When did he renounce his British citizenship?  If he did not, he still is and therefore is NOT natural born.  He is not natural born because his father WAS NOT a citizen.  </p>
<p>Why could I call the Hawaiian hewspaper and place a birth announcement for anyone I want to?  His mother and grandmother placed the announcement because he WAS NOT a citizen and they had to establish his birth in order to receive benefits for him.  How did his mother arrive in Washington state to registar for and start school only a few weeks after Obama was born?  How was that possible in those days when there were no flights from Hawaii to the mainland.</p>
<p>Why is it proven that his father lived by himself in an apartment close to his school and not with them?</p>
<p>If he was legally Sortero, how did his name become Obama and how is that a legal name and not an alias?  Why has the Illinois bar never prosecuted him for lying on his paperwork that he used no other names when he clearly has at least 3 names he has used?  What is his name?  How is a natural born citizen named Barry Sortero now Barrak Obama and that is legal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237569</link>
		<dc:creator>Decider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t much like people who pressure others to end debate and stop asking questions about topics they haven’t personally approved to be worthy of curiosity.

Bizarro No. 1 on February 8, 2010 at 6:22 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t much like people who pressure others to end debate and stop asking questions about topics they haven’t personally approved to be worthy of curiosity.</p>
<p>Bizarro No. 1 on February 8, 2010 at 6:22 AM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/" rel="nofollow">http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/11/12/eric-cartman-is-simply-asking-questions-glenn-beck-style/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237563</link>
		<dc:creator>Decider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237563</guid>
		<description>The birther issue is a winning issue...for the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The birther issue is a winning issue&#8230;for the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Must Know Headlines 2.8.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237428</link>
		<dc:creator>Must Know Headlines 2.8.2010 — ExposeTheMedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237428</guid>
		<description>[...] Breitbart, Farah Argue Birtherism At Tea Party Convention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Breitbart, Farah Argue Birtherism At Tea Party Convention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizarro No. 1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizarro No. 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237421</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Results 1 – 9 of about 633,000 for hot air birthers. (0.25 seconds) 

Drop the issue.

Connie on February 7, 2010 at 1:57 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YOU&lt;/strong&gt; drop being a control freak who selfishly dictates to others what they should and shouldn&#039;t be interested in because of your pathetic anxiety.

I am not a Birther, but I find Anti-Birthers to be immeasurably more annoying than those they label &quot;Birthers&quot;. Anti-Birthers are like those who angrily blame others who didn&#039;t vote for McCain for giving us 0bamessiah. 

I don&#039;t much like people who pressure others to end debate and stop asking questions about topics they haven&#039;t personally approved to be worthy of curiosity. Who does that sound like? Such people should be kept at arm&#039;s length and ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Results 1 – 9 of about 633,000 for hot air birthers. (0.25 seconds) </p>
<p>Drop the issue.</p>
<p>Connie on February 7, 2010 at 1:57 AM</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>YOU</strong> drop being a control freak who selfishly dictates to others what they should and shouldn&#8217;t be interested in because of your pathetic anxiety.</p>
<p>I am not a Birther, but I find Anti-Birthers to be immeasurably more annoying than those they label &#8220;Birthers&#8221;. Anti-Birthers are like those who angrily blame others who didn&#8217;t vote for McCain for giving us 0bamessiah. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t much like people who pressure others to end debate and stop asking questions about topics they haven&#8217;t personally approved to be worthy of curiosity. Who does that sound like? Such people should be kept at arm&#8217;s length and ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslans Girl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237370</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslans Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237370</guid>
		<description>Thanks, justincase, for the links. &quot;Blog-pimp&quot; all you want!

firepilot, you do remember the whole &quot;John-McCain-prove-your-citizenship&quot; thing in Congress a couple of years ago, right? It was hard to miss...

-Aslan&#039;s Girl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, justincase, for the links. &#8220;Blog-pimp&#8221; all you want!</p>
<p>firepilot, you do remember the whole &#8220;John-McCain-prove-your-citizenship&#8221; thing in Congress a couple of years ago, right? It was hard to miss&#8230;</p>
<p>-Aslan&#8217;s Girl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firepilot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237369</link>
		<dc:creator>firepilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237369</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain was forced to prove to the Senate he was Natural Born Citizen&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Prove it.

I think this one one of those things that birthers convince each other of, but is not true, just like the rest of the nonsense like the mythical travel ban to Pakistan, that was not true either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McCain was forced to prove to the Senate he was Natural Born Citizen</p></blockquote>
<p>Prove it.</p>
<p>I think this one one of those things that birthers convince each other of, but is not true, just like the rest of the nonsense like the mythical travel ban to Pakistan, that was not true either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Western_Civ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237350</link>
		<dc:creator>Western_Civ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237350</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s a legitimate subject to keep exploring, it&#039;s not going to have truck with the voting public this election cycle, and probably not in the next.  Therefore, it&#039;s best not to insist it be any kind of plank in any party effort. 

Nevertheless, this issue will never die, and must at some future date be resolved.  Anyone who ignores the fact that Obama does not meet lawful requirements (based on the other Natural Born Citizen criteria--not so much on his birth certificate) is either kidding himself, lying to misdirect others, or is too ignorant to know the difference.

If we ever lose the ability or the right to discuss this issue, the truth of Obama&#039;s origins may by that fact become self-evident.  But even then we&#039;ll have only a pyrrhic victory on this score, and it may because we didn&#039;t focus on the more provable case against the marxist statist intentions of Barack Hussein Obama.  &lt;strong&gt;And that is no theory.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s a legitimate subject to keep exploring, it&#8217;s not going to have truck with the voting public this election cycle, and probably not in the next.  Therefore, it&#8217;s best not to insist it be any kind of plank in any party effort. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, this issue will never die, and must at some future date be resolved.  Anyone who ignores the fact that Obama does not meet lawful requirements (based on the other Natural Born Citizen criteria&#8211;not so much on his birth certificate) is either kidding himself, lying to misdirect others, or is too ignorant to know the difference.</p>
<p>If we ever lose the ability or the right to discuss this issue, the truth of Obama&#8217;s origins may by that fact become self-evident.  But even then we&#8217;ll have only a pyrrhic victory on this score, and it may because we didn&#8217;t focus on the more provable case against the marxist statist intentions of Barack Hussein Obama.  <strong>And that is no theory.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justincase</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237348</link>
		<dc:creator>justincase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237348</guid>
		<description>I hope I&#039;m correct in understanding the &quot;liars like justincase&quot; comment was sarcastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;m correct in understanding the &#8220;liars like justincase&#8221; comment was sarcastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steveangell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237342</link>
		<dc:creator>Steveangell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237342</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The media doesn’t want to touch it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
They seem to take their orders on this from Obama.

Just Google Obama in Advanced for news prior to 2006.  It has been completely scrubbed.  It is just unbelievable how little freedom we have in Amerika.  I mean how is it Obama can get all news Articles about him scrubbed.

Just accept that COLB in cyberspace.  Again try to register your child in preschool with that.  He has offered no proof what so ever.  Furthermore he ran Fact Check&#039;s parent Anneberg so they are hardly a reliable check on him.

How can anyone think he could legally be President when he was an Indonesian citizen in grade school.  Had he been a Natural Born citizen he still lost that when Mr Soterro adopted him making him an Indonesian Citizen.  This is really not disputable.  He claims he attended school there there are records of him there and they build a statue of him there.  The law required he be a citizen to attend school there his mothers Divorce Decree mentions Barry as involved in the Divorce proving he was adopted. 

The biggest lie of all is his mother would have not cared to get a Hawaii COLB for him unless she was planing for him to be president.  NO.  Every American mother wants their child to have a COLB so they can attend school.  When some one spouts nonsense like that you know very well they are lying through their teeth trying to cover something up.

Maybe justincase has lied worse.  Obama must release the records.  Privacy laws only allow him to do it or a Court.  But so far the Courts have refused to uphold the Constitution and illegally kept the case from ever proceeding to the point of discovery (forcing Obama to release his records).  But no amount of proof would ever be enough for liars like justincase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The media doesn’t want to touch it. </p></blockquote>
<p>They seem to take their orders on this from Obama.</p>
<p>Just Google Obama in Advanced for news prior to 2006.  It has been completely scrubbed.  It is just unbelievable how little freedom we have in Amerika.  I mean how is it Obama can get all news Articles about him scrubbed.</p>
<p>Just accept that COLB in cyberspace.  Again try to register your child in preschool with that.  He has offered no proof what so ever.  Furthermore he ran Fact Check&#8217;s parent Anneberg so they are hardly a reliable check on him.</p>
<p>How can anyone think he could legally be President when he was an Indonesian citizen in grade school.  Had he been a Natural Born citizen he still lost that when Mr Soterro adopted him making him an Indonesian Citizen.  This is really not disputable.  He claims he attended school there there are records of him there and they build a statue of him there.  The law required he be a citizen to attend school there his mothers Divorce Decree mentions Barry as involved in the Divorce proving he was adopted. </p>
<p>The biggest lie of all is his mother would have not cared to get a Hawaii COLB for him unless she was planing for him to be president.  NO.  Every American mother wants their child to have a COLB so they can attend school.  When some one spouts nonsense like that you know very well they are lying through their teeth trying to cover something up.</p>
<p>Maybe justincase has lied worse.  Obama must release the records.  Privacy laws only allow him to do it or a Court.  But so far the Courts have refused to uphold the Constitution and illegally kept the case from ever proceeding to the point of discovery (forcing Obama to release his records).  But no amount of proof would ever be enough for liars like justincase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObjectionSustained</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237335</link>
		<dc:creator>ObjectionSustained</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237335</guid>
		<description>Even if you are committed to the birth certificate issue, it&#039;s best to let it go. There are better strategic points to put up a stand.  As Churchill said (paraphrasing), if you try to fight everywhere, you will have victory nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you are committed to the birth certificate issue, it&#8217;s best to let it go. There are better strategic points to put up a stand.  As Churchill said (paraphrasing), if you try to fight everywhere, you will have victory nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichevo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/06/breitbart-farah-argue-birtherism-at-tea-party-convention/comment-page-6/#comment-3237330</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=80896#comment-3237330</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“It’s self-indulgent, it’s narcissistic, it’s a losing issue,” Breitbart told Schilling. “It’s a losing situation. If you don’t have the frigging evidence — raising the question?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you, Andrew Breitbart. 

No thank you, World Net Daily, for encouraging the conspiracy contingent in a sales effort that rivals the HSN.

No thank you, justincase, blog pimper extraordinaire. 

It&#039;s the economy, stupid. And freedom, and the growth and intrusion of government into that freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“It’s self-indulgent, it’s narcissistic, it’s a losing issue,” Breitbart told Schilling. “It’s a losing situation. If you don’t have the frigging evidence — raising the question?</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you, Andrew Breitbart. </p>
<p>No thank you, World Net Daily, for encouraging the conspiracy contingent in a sales effort that rivals the HSN.</p>
<p>No thank you, justincase, blog pimper extraordinaire. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the economy, stupid. And freedom, and the growth and intrusion of government into that freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
