Obama dispatches missile defenses to the Persian Gulf

posted at 8:45 am on February 1, 2010 by Karl

Credit where credit is due?

The US is dispatching Patriot defensive missiles to four countries – Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Kuwait – and keeping two ships in the Gulf capable of shooting down Iranian missiles. Washington is also helping Saudi Arabia develop a force to protect its oil installations.

American officials said the move is aimed at deterring an attack by Iran and reassuring Gulf states fearful that Tehran might react to sanctions by striking at US allies in the region. Washington is also seeking to discourage Israel from a strike against Iran by demonstrating that the US is prepared to contain any threat.

The deployment comes after Obama’s attempts to emphasise diplomacy over confrontation in dealing with Iran – a contrast to the Bush administration’s approach – have failed to persuade Tehran to open its nuclear installations to international controls. The White House is now trying to engineer agreement for sanctions focused on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, believed to be in charge of the atomic programme.

Washington has not formally announced the deployment of the Patriots and other anti-missile systems, but by leaking it to American newspapers the administration is evidently seeking to alert Tehran to a hardening of its position. (Emphasis added.)

Apparently, not enough of the establishment media noticed that Gen. David H. Petraeus went public with most of this “news” back on Jan. 22. The timing is key, as the Senate passed an Iran sanctions bill Thursday night, with the aid of Joementum. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has responded with some sabre-rattling of his own, promising a harsh blow to the “global arrogance” next week, to mark the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution.

Kudos to Julian Barnes of the L.A. Times for looking at the bigger picture:

Obama administration officials also hope to head off an expanded nuclear arms race in the region. If Tehran acquires a nuclear weapon, or is seen as making progress toward acquiring one, wealthy Arab Gulf governments could seek their own weapons, a scenario Washington views as potentially volatile.

That is an understatement, given that Iran’s nuclear ambition already has the Gulf states looking at developing similarly “peaceful” nuclear programs.

Allahpundit/McLaughlin-esque exit question: Do these moves signal that Pres. Obama is taking the Iranian threat seriously, or are they another sign that he is planning for the day that the “international community” failed to stop Iran from getting the bomb?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Hening on February 1, 2010 at 11:18 AM

What? Don’t tell me I’ve gone deaf again!

OldEnglish on February 1, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Wag that dog, Bambi!

uncalheels on February 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM

“Iran is Just a Tiny Country.”

coldwarrior on February 1, 2010 at 9:03 AM

And bring us to now, and Obama is gearing up in defense mode, against this….”just a tiny country”. Talk about naive. It simply amazes me that this doof was elected.

capejasmine on February 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM

If not for the international community of leftists appeasing Islamists, we’d probably have Iran completely surrounded by now.

Connie on February 1, 2010 at 11:28 AM

Still not enough wars going on for the HotAir “conservatives,” I see.

Good Lord…

For Kirk and for Taft, war “was the enemy of constitution, liberty, economic security, and the cake of custom.” It had to be the very last resort, not only because it “would make the American President a virtual dictator, diminish the constitutional powers of Congress, contract civil liberties, injure the habitual self-reliance and self-government of the American people, distort the economy,” and “sink the federal government in debt” but also because it would “break in upon private and public morality,” destroying the very basis of our Christian civilization. The damage it would inflict “might require generations for the nation to recover”—like a brief but near-lethal encounter with pneumonia or cancer marks one for years—even if it was “a war of a few years’ duration.”

After eight years of constant warfare—occasioned by deception, a regime of torture, and a wholesale assault on the Constitution and what remains of our civil liberties—it is difficult to see how we can hope to come out of it (if we ever come out of it) with our sense of humanity intact, let alone our old Republic. The damage could well be permanent, and, in any case, it may be a horse race between the healing process and the time we have left before we’re driven into bankruptcy.
[...]
In an era when radio-shouters, vulgar hucksters, and out-and-out charlatans have taken the spotlight on the American Right, conservatives need to remember their past—to get back in touch with their roots. While the conservative movement is cut adrift, looking for an anchor, what could be better than the principled prudence of these two nearly forgotten giants, Kirk and Taft?

Rae on February 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Wag that dog, Bambi!

uncalheels on February 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM

Bing. So predictable it’s almost funny.

Jaibones on February 1, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Obama, your lack of experience is “un-sustainable”.

Claypigeon on February 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Mr. President! You have to stop this rampant leftism and move back to the center, or we’re going to get slaughtered in the midterms.

Fine. What issue will help us regain the trust of moderates and independents?

Well, you could bomb Iran…

Jaibones on February 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM

Iran’s attack on Israel would be much more likely to succeed if the US were removed from the equation. http://newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-nuclear-plan/2008/07/29/id/324724

hogfat on February 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM

Obama, your lack of experience is “un-sustainable”.

Claypigeon on February 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Oh, I think Zero can remain clueless just about forever.

Maquis on February 1, 2010 at 12:14 PM

Up on Drudge right now:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0120076120100201

Failure to take down missile in simulated attack.

Isn’t this the missile platform that was told not to move into position against the North Korea missile threats? Maybe we should have let them have that practice round- eh Barry?

journeyintothewhirlwind on February 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

Semper Fidelis

Though not a Jarhead it works for me.

journeyintothewhirlwind on February 1, 2010 at 6:17 PM

Nice work. The practice shot today: yep. That Barak; is there nothing he can’t foul up?

Caststeel on February 1, 2010 at 6:53 PM

Obama, your lack of experience is “un-sustainable”.

Claypigeon on February 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Let us not forget that his lack of experience is also “un-precedented”

M-14 2go on February 1, 2010 at 7:01 PM

Good. But I doubt the Iranians take Him seriously anyway?

Dr. ZhivBlago on February 1, 2010 at 10:03 PM

It had to be the very last resort, not only because it “would make the American President a virtual dictator, diminish the constitutional powers of Congress, contract civil liberties, injure the habitual self-reliance and self-government of the American people,

We and Europe been talking to Iran for 6 years now, Iran playing us for fools. Meanwhile they get closer and closer to the bomb. At what point will we have reached this “last resort” to your satisfaction?

YehuditTX on February 1, 2010 at 10:38 PM

Comment pages: 1 2