Wall Street shocked, shocked that former community organizer demonizes wealthy

posted at 10:55 am on January 28, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Where were these people in 2007 and 2008?  Oh, right — contributing to Barack Obama’s campaign (via Instapundit):

When Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and White House adviser Valerie Jarrett hosted a private dinner with the leaders of six banks to discuss financial regulation on Jan. 20, the bankers soon changed the subject. The president needed to stop demonizing Wall Street, they told Jarrett, according to three people familiar with the meeting.

What the executives, including Brian Moynihan, the chief executive officer of Bank of America Corp., and Robert Kelly, the chief executive of Bank of New York Mellon Corp., didn’t know was that President Barack Obama, who had proposed a new tax on the biggest banks six days earlier, was about to strike again.

After leaving the meeting around 9 p.m., the executives learned that Obama would ask Congress the next day to ban commercial banks from running proprietary trading operations, owning hedge funds, and rapidly increasing market share. In his remarks, Obama indicated his willingness to go to the mat with the industry: “So if these folks want a fight, it’s a fight I’m ready to have.”

Industry officials said they were stunned. “We did not know it was coming, that’s for sure,” said Scott Talbott, a lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents large banks and insurance companies and whose chairman, Richard Davis, the CEO of U.S. Bancorp, also attended the dinner.

In his SOTU speech, Barack Obama barely mentioned the war in Afghanistan, explicitly referring to it in only three sentences near the end of the speech.  However, Obama offered plenty of class warfare against the wealthy.  He repeatedly castigated banks and Wall Street for creating the financial collapse, even managing to blame them for the housing bubble that Congress created through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 1998-2007, and which Congress continues through FHA to this day.

If this comes as a surprise to anyone, let alone Wall Street leaders, then they simply haven’t been paying attention.  Obama’s previous career before politics was a community organizer, one of a distinctly leftward tilt.   When he told Joe the Plumber that he wanted to “spread the wealth,” where did they think he would find it?  Instead of thinking like a chessmaster a few moves forward into the future, Wall Street played checkers with their political donations instead — or perhaps Chutes and Ladders — and financed a class-warfare master into the White House.

You know what this moment requires, don’t you?  Too bad we don’t have a Victor Lazlo to slap some sense into these people.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Wear that award proudly you brainstems.

ted c on January 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM

Reality hits wallstreet upside the face like a slap from a dead fish.

Mord on January 28, 2010 at 11:00 AM

It is show. He has his hand out and takes donations. Kickbacks and incentivized personal loans.

Obama is two faced.

seven on January 28, 2010 at 11:00 AM

The day Obama stands for cutting pollution he will stop smoking also.

seven on January 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM

NEWS FLASH—
ObaMao is a Communist. Why would anyone doubt this? It is not a secret.

Ed Laskie on January 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM

What do you expect Wall Street….You sleep with The Scorpion- you will feel it’s stinger!.

hawkman on January 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM

There are consequences to elections…

d1carter on January 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM

Silly bankers… they didn’t realize that the only protected class of people are politicians. Everyone else gets sold out.

Wineaholic on January 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM

I feel no sympathy for Wall Street, bankers or the pharmaceutical companies. Those bastards went to bed with Barry, they can live with it.

GarandFan on January 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM

I must have missed this part of the speech. All I heard was bad Bush, I inherited, bad Republican’s, bad Bush, I didn’t ask for what bad Bush left me yada yada yada.

Knucklehead on January 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM

Wall Street is just noticing this now? So we have a bunch of idiots in charge of what’s left of the private economy? No wonder we had an economic meltdown.

rbj on January 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM

Apparently the Wall Stree folks forgot there is always an sxpiration date on Obama’s pandering and promises.

katiejane on January 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM

I think Barry should do a retroactive tax on all the Wall Street and mortgage banking bonuses on the subprime mess. He can start with using Franklin Raines of Fannie fame with the IRS as a prototype.

IlikedAUH2O on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

wall street
out of touch

white house
out of touch

congress
out of touch

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Wall Street will line up to vote for him again in 2012 anyway. Money talks, even the taxpayer variety that Obama likes to throw at Wall Street like confetti.

Fletch54 on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

It is the nature of men to create monsters, and it’s the nature of monsters to destroy their makers.

You’d think those CEOs would have known that going into the last national election.

Liam on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Thhis class warfare stuff is serious and Wall Street is full of idiots.
Obama intends to get his cash directly from the idiots and if they have any doubt look to Oregon.
The unions played the class warfare game here and won big! However companies started laying off yesterday. I am shutting down my home business as of today.
Obama’s America can not possibly prosper and Wall Street is not immune to the effect.

ORconservative on January 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM

It is time for the the people that invest, create jobs, create value, and employ people to stand up to these adolescent, marxist progressives.

daesleeper on January 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM

The whole SOTUA was how capitalism is bad and socialism is good. Obama cut down banks and businesses saying that they are greedy or too risky, AKA Capitalism. Obama demands that risk and greed not be controlled but removed completely. This is Socialism. Governments role is to curtail risk and greed, not destroy it.
Obama calls for more exporting as a way of growing our economy. But then sets in motion a higher education system that incentivize people to go into areas of community organizing thru lower tuition costs (subsidizing). Community organizing doesn’t have any value outside this country thus cannot be exported. So even if this country could export something that is competitive and useful to other countries, its workforce is going to to pay for it. Essentially we are going to subsidize people to spread good feelings and joy inside this country but punish others for being capitalists.
This why Obama scolded the Supreme Court. Their decision puts capitalists in favor of the direction of this country and not socialists. Say what you will about the SCOTUS decision but in order for socialism to exist and thrive in this country, it needs the support of Government or else it will fail.
Yep, Obama is correct when he said that he didn’t explain to us what his vision is. It is all clear now if it wasn’t before. China! Socialized interior with a capitalist exterior.

Electrongod on January 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM

On that subject, will Slate come to the defense of these guys????

Business, like politics, is about compromise. Every dollar of profit is a dollar that could have been given to a customer through a price discount or paid to a vendor or employee. The popular perception of accounting rules is that they are binary: yes or no, right or wrong. In fact, accounting is often open to as wide a range of interpretation as interior decorating.

ENRON should have had these guys!

See: http://www.slate.com/id/2107894

IlikedAUH2O on January 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM

I must have missed this part of the speech. All I heard was bad Bush, I inherited, bad Republican’s, bad Bush, I didn’t ask for what bad Bush left me yada yada yada.

Knucklehead on January 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM

Speech? I guess I missed it. Did I miss anything?

Didn’t think so.

donh525 on January 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM

Was it John Dillinger who, (when asked why he robbed banks), responded “Because that’s where the money is.”?

Seems like the same principal is in play here.

oldleprechaun on January 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM

How blind can these people be? They’re rich and they run large corporations. That makes them the perfect target for the Dems and their class warfare politics.

Luckily for them, the Supreme Court just threw them a lifeline. They better use it though and back the right candidates this time around.

Doughboy on January 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM

But then sets in motion a higher education system that incentivize people to go into areas of community organizing thru lower tuition costs (subsidizing).

Electrongod on January 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM

This part of the speech especially floored me and I am surprised it isn’t getting more attention. He actually proposed to forego payment of student loans after 10 years if you go into public service. This is another way to punish the private sector by making them subsidize government jobs. Pathetic.

KickandSwimMom on January 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM

Well the wealthy can all move to Oregon. They just rolled out the welcome mat. /sarc

I hope Nike moves their HQ out of OR.

WashJeff on January 28, 2010 at 11:12 AM

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

+1

cmsinaz on January 28, 2010 at 11:12 AM

The fun of seeing these Masters of the Universe getting burned by their own asinine “progressive” elitism is greatly mitigated by the fact that Obozo is taking down the American economy at the same time.

Cicero43 on January 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM

Dow Jones -119 right now.

AubieJon on January 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM

Instead of thinking like a chessmaster a few moves forward into the future, Wall Street played checkers with their political donations instead

Wall Street was playing tic-tac-toe, at best … and white-guilt tic-tac-toe, at that. Checkers is as much a game of skill and strategy as chess, if not more. Checkers had a human (who has since died) who could beat all computer checkers programs while chess was already fully taken down by computer programs.

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Hey Wall Street if you sleep with dogs…

orlandocajun on January 28, 2010 at 11:14 AM

fools backed Obama over Hillary. As the Senator form NY, HRC is very aware of the importance of the financial sector to the American economy.
unlike O or he doesnt care.

ginaswo on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM

Too bad none of these bank CEOs have the stones to run a Super Bowl ad attacking Obama and his socialist agenda. That would be all kinds of awesome.

rockmom on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM

Joe the Plumber 1
Wall Street Brainiacs 0

portlandon on January 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Obowmao is part of the Far-left National Socialist fringe of the Democrat Party – he is a Statist at heart, OF course he’s going to go after the Rich, it’s what National Socialists do.

Why did it take wall street this long to figure that out?

Chip on January 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Astonishing that anyone trusts the Liar in Chief.
Will NYCity turn on Obama and the radical left this November?

GaltBlvnAtty on January 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM

As the Senator form NY, HRC is very aware of the importance of the financial sector to the American economy.
unlike O or he doesnt care.

ginaswo on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM

I know that Shrillary was representing New York as their Senator, but did she ever actually step foot in New York?

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM

Industry officials said they were stunned. “We did not know it was coming, that’s for sure,”

So banking officials, after living through one year of the Socialist in Chiefs reign, are stunned, stunned I tell you, to find out Obama’s a socialist.

Obama’s a snake charmer…and that makes them….?

donh525 on January 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM

trouble with buying off lieftists and true beklievers. they use you not you them. they see you as a means to an end instead of a sugar daddy

At least when you buy off a Rino he/she stays bought

unseen on January 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM

Too bad none of these bank CEOs have the stones to run a Super Bowl ad attacking Obama and his socialist agenda. That would be all kinds of awesome.

rockmom on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM

And would be the end of those CEOs’ careers, as Ken Lewis pushed back and was pushed out at BoA.

ROCnPhilly on January 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM

Top donors to Obama in 2008:

University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132

Hey Wall St, you paid for it, now you own it.

angryed on January 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Dare I say this was an unexpected reaction?

Johnnyreb on January 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM

and my guess is they will contribute to his relection bid in 2012 too.

ncsully on January 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM

Wasn’t it Lenin that said that the capitalist class would sell him the rope that he would use to hang them?

Some things never change, I guess.

Cicero43 on January 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM

now maybe we’ll learn that wall street is not our friend

i dont support taxation
or lefty policies

but i will always look at wall street and big business suspiciously.

they, like big government, owe their allegiance to one thing and one thing only

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM

Hey Wall St, you paid for it, now you own it.

angryed on January 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Hey Wall St, you paid for it, now you own it it owns you.

FIFY

ROCnPhilly on January 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM

Was it John Dillinger who, (when asked why he robbed banks), responded “Because that’s where the money is.”?

Willie Sutton…but you’re right on the analysis.

http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/famcases/sutton/sutton.htm

Hongqi on January 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM

I feel no sympathy for Wall Street, bankers or the pharmaceutical companies. Those bastards went to bed with Barry, they can live with it.

GarandFan on January 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM

I sympathise with that sentiment, but the sad reality is we’re all going to be living with it.

jarodea on January 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM

It took Carter to get Reagan. It will take this imbecile to get the next Reagan. Maybe the geniuses on Wall St. will wise up next time.

angryed on January 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM

conservatism is the friend of small business for a reason.

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM

Top donors to Obama in 2008:

University of California $1,591,395

angryed on January 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM

I thought the Calif university system was sucking wind for money. But they were contributing to a political campaign? What’s up with that? I didn’t think that public universities were even allowed to contribute to campaigns. Where does that go in their budgets?

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Government is like tort law. It expands toward the largest pool of money.

ROCnPhilly on January 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Wouldn’t be surprised that most voted for him. Too bad, so sad Wall Street and deep-pockets.

yoda on January 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Guess that means we can all break out in a hearty chorus of “The Thrill Is Gone!”.

pilamaye on January 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

Ken Lewis was not an Ivy League Wall Street insider; he came from a humble background and worked his way up. He was not “one fof them.”

DaydreamBeliever on January 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

This part of the speech especially floored me and I am surprised it isn’t getting more attention.

KickandSwimMom on January 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM

There were so many things that floored me in that speech last night, I don’t even know where to start. I’m still too busy trying to retrieve my jaw from the coffee table this morning.

Knucklehead on January 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

Astonishing that anyone trusts the Liar in Chief.
Will NYCity turn on Obama and the radical left this November?

GaltBlvnAtty on January 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM

You would hope. Not only has Obama gone after Wall Street, but the KSM trial has to have New Yorkers really PO’d. Amazingly one of his harshest critics in the country has been Gov. Patterson. If even a blind man can see what Obama’s doing to NY, hopefully the rest of its residents can also.

Doughboy on January 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

I love the smell of class warfare in the morning….smells like…LIBERALS.

OK, I don’t love the smell…but that’s the line so I ran with it.

search4truth on January 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM

“The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” — Karl Marx

Wall street needs to get that through their thick skulls.

Chip on January 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM

When he told Joe the Plumber that he wanted to “spread the wealth,” where did they think he would find it?

“Show me…show me what happens when people get fed up with banks,” he said.
“Ah, yes, a familar one! Igor, set up program five!” Hubert shouted to some figure in the forest of glassware. There was the sound of squeaky valves being turned and the glug of reservoirs being topped up….

Something clunked, and colored waters began to foam and slosh along the bigger pipes. Hubert raised not only his voice but also a long pointer.

“Now, if we reduce public confidence in the banking system — watch that tube there — you will see a flow of cash out of the banks and into flask 28, currently designated ‘The Old Sock Under the Mattress.’ Even quite rich people done want their money outside their control. See the mattress getting fuller, or perhaps I should say — thicker?”

“That’s a lot of mattresses,” Moist agreed.

“I prefer to think of it as one mattress one third of a mile high.”

“Now we see how bank lending is emptying as money drains into the sock?” Gurgle “Watch Reservoir 11, over there. That means business expansion is slowing…the scale on the left of Flask 17 shows collapsing businesses, by the way. See Flask 9 begining to fill? That’s foreclosures. Job losses is Flask 7…”

“And we end in a position where we can’t move because we are standing on our hands, as it were,” said Hubert. “Jobs vanishing, people without savings suffering, wages low, farms going back to wilderness, rampaging trolls coming down from the mountains…”

So it’s obvious where he’ll get the money — from out of the socks in all of our mattresses.

unclesmrgol on January 28, 2010 at 11:25 AM

Ed, you have enough material to have a Capt. Renault Award of the Week as a regular feature. Do it! There will be enough material to last until 2011, anyway.

either orr on January 28, 2010 at 11:26 AM

OK, I don’t love the smell…but that’s the line so I ran with it.

search4truth on January 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM

all is forgiven

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM

I thought the Calif university system was sucking wind for money. But they were contributing to a political campaign? What’s up with that? I didn’t think that public universities were even allowed to contribute to campaigns. Where does that go in their budgets?

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Those numbers are not associated with the University itself so much as with the employees of the University. When you make a political donation, you are now required to list your employer. This number is the sum of all contributions which were given by people who listed their employer as the UC System.

unclesmrgol on January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM

It is the nature of men to create monsters, and it’s the nature of monsters to destroy their makers.

You’d think those CEOs would have known that going into the last national election.

Liam on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Stupid is as stupid does. As much as I hate to say so, bankers are not the brightest bulbs in the light socket (Dad was a banker). We give our money to people who have no sense of how people work and then expect them to understand when things need a little longer to be paid off or a little more capital to push you into profitability. And then they pay themselves a lot with the money others give them to lend to us.

Stupid is as stupid does. And we all look like idiots.

Subsunk

Subsunk on January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM

Wall Street will line up to vote for him again in 2012 anyway. Money talks, even the taxpayer variety that Obama likes to throw at Wall Street like confetti.

Fletch54 on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

And the reason the Dems want to pass the healtcare legislation as is, is because they’ve already secured massive donations from the insurance industry and the pharmas to the tune of millions. You think the Dems are going to whine about the Scotus decision when those corporations begin filling their electoral coffers?

Rovin on January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM

He was not “one fof them.”

DaydreamBeliever on January 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

My point was: He was a bank CEO that grumbled against Obama and was demonized and hassled until he was forced out. That’s why no CEO will fund ads against him.

ROCnPhilly on January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

That list includes individuals who work for the corporation/university. Which is why Harvard, UC is on the list, donations for professors went something like 12:1 for Obama over McCain. Same with Google which I remember reading had almost 100% of its employee contributions go to Obama. Might explain why HuffPo is always at the top of search results when the topic has to do with politics.

angryed on January 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM

the markets down again today, not sure if it is a response to this speech

phillypolitics on January 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM

Willful blindness by the voters. That’s what got Obama into the White House.

Daddy-O on January 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM

Let me see if I get this right. Castigate the SCOTUS right in their faces and expect everyone to just get along.

rjoco1 on January 28, 2010 at 11:30 AM

Suck it, fellas.

Suck it long, and suck it hard.

/connery

greggriffith on January 28, 2010 at 11:31 AM

unclesmrgol on January 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM

Okay. My mistake. I thought it was a list of corporate contributions.

neurosculptor on January 28, 2010 at 11:32 AM

Chutes and Ladders?

More like Candyland…

ladyingray on January 28, 2010 at 11:32 AM

greggriffith on January 28, 2010 at 11:31 AM

correction

shuck it
shuck it long
shuck it haaahhhrd

blatantblue on January 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM

Both of those camps are trying to create the false perception of distance from one another. They are thick as thieves.

Buddahpundit on January 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM

the markets down again today, not sure if it is a response to this speech

phillypolitics on January 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM

Yeah, who the heck knows. *sighs and pops another TUMS*

Midas on January 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM

Gosh, I forgot that I’m not supposed to do better than my parents did! As an ex-Wall Streeter don’t believe the hype that everyone who works in finance is bad. Sure some of the “greed heads” at the top of some firms may exist, but don’t listen to everything this party/president wants you to believe. It’s simply NOT true! Whatever happened to capitalism? Am I supposed to hate everyone that makes more money than me?

trader67 on January 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM

Mixed feelings here.

While I absolutely hate Obama’s statist impulses and his general socialist ideology, it’s extremely difficult for me to feel even a shred of sympathy for these Wall St. types that were more than happy and eager to fund his campaign … not to mention, far more than willing to have us taxpayers bail them out when they made bad investments (heads they win, tails we lose).

thirteen28 on January 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM

Biting the hand that fed him. Gotta admit, that takes some stones. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.

I will be shocked – shocked! if anything changes.

av8tr on January 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM

Wow I guess they did figure it out, the market is down -161 right now. Looks like free fall all over again. Sigh…..there goes my 401K gains.

Johnnyreb on January 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM

Wall Street shocked, shocked that former community organizer demonizes wealthy in his speeches

Let’s face it. Obama isn’t going to be making the wealthy poor any time soon. He’ll still be making backroom deals with the biggest, most powerful corporations. Heck, he’s in Soros’ pocket. The people that will suffer are the middle class.

MeatHeadinCA on January 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM

They have a part in this – no sympathy.

However we can’t have Wall Street destroyed either. It will damage us all.

OT – anybody else get a nice slap in the face when they added up the amount of taxes on their W2. I knew it was bad – I didn’t know it was THAT bad! I hate liberals.

gophergirl on January 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM

Biting the hand that fed him. Gotta admit, that takes some stones. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.

I will be shocked – shocked! if anything changes.

av8tr on January 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM

Precisely. He’s only playing to his commie base… he’s not going to change anything. Just squeeze the money out of the majority of Americans wallets via plans like cap-n-trade.

MeatHeadinCA on January 28, 2010 at 11:36 AM

Looks like Obama’s new hit on evil Wall Street has given them the jitters. Not surprised. I wonder if they have buyers remorse? Sort of off topic but after watching a re-run of this “speech” I noticed nowhere in it did he thank our military.This is the first time I think that a President didn’t acknowledge them. I guess he was too busy attacking the Supreme Court and bankers, oh and of course, George Bush.

sandee on January 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM

“And we end in a position where we can’t move because we are standing on our hands, as it were,” said Hubert. “Jobs vanishing, people without savings suffering, wages low, farms going back to wilderness, rampaging trolls coming down from the mountains…”

unclesmrgol on January 28, 2010 at 11:25 AM

Mind if I keep this around and use it again uncle…?

Seven Percent Solution on January 28, 2010 at 11:39 AM

I had trouble keeping up.

I mean, he started the “meat” of his SOTU address with those evil Wall St bankers (cue populist polls being read wrong by Rahm, Axel) being the enemy; then switched to “I don’t want to make them my enemy, they are family’s, jobs (cue in rational attempt at poll reality – financial companies employ 2M in America), then immediately switched to thier “bonuses’”, threw in the tax ceiling, then went back to a “I am not here to punish the banks and Wall St”

He is an unqualified moron.

Odie1941 on January 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM

Don’t worry Wall Street. You will all have Government Jobs under the Politboro working for President For Life Obama.

kingsjester on January 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM

Obama proposing this tax isn’t really anything new. The bankers shock is silly. We all know full well, if this tax is imposed, the rest of us will pay for it. Not the bankers. This is Obama’s slight of hand, to raise our taxes without actually getting to us, first hand.

capejasmine on January 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM

This is why I do my own trading. The wall street people are not that smart. They do not see very basic trends and would not know how to get out of a wet paper sack.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

jukin on January 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Reminder. Liberals always think that the redistribution and demonization apply to OTHER people, not to themselves. So the bankers think Obama’s talking about the trial lawyers, and the trial lawyers think he’s talking about big pharma, and big pharma thinks he’s talking about greedy colleges, and the college administrators think he’s talking about the banks.

But, of course, Obama is talking about taking from and demonizing ALL of those groups, and any group other than himself, his families, and his inner circle of friends/advisors. Such is the way of the Progressive.

hawksruleva on January 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Obama proposing this tax isn’t really anything new. The bankers shock is silly. We all know full well, if this tax is imposed, the rest of us will pay for it. Not the bankers. This is Obama’s slight of hand, to raise our taxes without actually getting to us, first hand.

capejasmine on January 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM

This is another problem that I have with the repayment of TARP. TARP was a loan to banks given by taxpayers against their future earnings. Most of the banks repaid it with interest. Since the loan was repaid, taxpayers will not have to suffer to make good on the loan. The cycle has ended. But Obama said that he will take the banks repayment and use it for community organizing. Obama has now initiated another loan against our future earnings.

Electrongod on January 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Obama used to lead ACORN thugs into Chicago banks at night to “persuade” bank executives (via back-alley threats) to lend to insolvent borrowers in the “organized community”.

Should it surprise anyone that he now wants to take their money using the power of the Presidency?

Earth to Obama: The Federal Reserve, to which Congress gave the power to lend money to the Government, is owned by a consortium of private banks. Bash the bankers too much, they might turn off the spigot…

Steve Z on January 28, 2010 at 12:01 PM

President Addresses The Nation “There’s Seventy Minutes I Can Never Get Back”

Yeah, I’m Just Not Feeling It.

What does the President need to do for a bump in the polls hint this isn’t it.

Did The Phrase the President used “I won’t Give Up, Don’t You Give Up” Sound familiar to anyone else? Train “Calling All You Angels.

Dr Evil on January 28, 2010 at 12:16 PM

Nancy Pelosi is resembling a sleestak more and more every day.

daesleeper on January 28, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Here stranger, hold my gun and this bag full of bullets for me.

What do you mean, “Stick ‘em up?”

DrAllecon on January 27, 2010 at 8:40 PM

DrAllecon on January 28, 2010 at 12:19 PM

where did they think he would find it?

It’s Obama money. You know, from his stash.

That’s why we voted for him!
Oba-ma!
Oba-ma!
Oba-ma

John Deaux on January 28, 2010 at 12:28 PM

Pray for the Republic………..we could be watching the beginnings of a Chavez style takeover.

Dark Days for freedom ahead?

PappyD61 on January 28, 2010 at 12:35 PM

Lots of Obama voters are now in a state of oops.

tarpon on January 28, 2010 at 12:37 PM

the markets down again today, not sure if it is a response to this speech

phillypolitics on January 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM

Well, you know if it was up today, they’d be spinning it as a positive reaction to BHO’s speech so I’m spinning the market being down as a negative reaction to everything O.

PatMac on January 28, 2010 at 1:24 PM

Hmmmm.

Sooooooo.

Valarie Jarret knew what was coming when she had dinner with these bankers and didn’t give them a heads up?

Classy.

memomachine on January 28, 2010 at 1:46 PM

Comment pages: 1 2