Revealed(?): What O’Keefe was really up to

posted at 9:07 pm on January 27, 2010 by Allahpundit

As you’ll see, an AP reporter who turned up on Matthews’s show this afternoon was apparently on the right track. According to a law enforcement source who talked to NBC, the point wasn’t to wiretap Landrieu’s phones. It was to figure out why so many people had trouble getting through to the office when they called to complain about the ObamaCare “Louisiana Purchase.”

Instead, the official says, the men, led by conservative videomaker James O’Keefe, wanted to see how her local office staff would respond if the phones were inoperative. They were apparently motivated, the official says, by criticism that when Sen. Landrieu became a big player in the health care debate, people in Louisiana were having a hard time getting through on the phones to register their views.

That is, the official says, what led the four men to pull this stunt — to see how the local staffers would react if the phones went out. Would the staff just laugh it off, or would they express great concern that local folks couldn’t get through?

I’m not sure what would have constituted “great concern.” Staffers asking how long it’ll be until the phones are fixed? Staffers bursting into tears at the thought that constituents might have to deal with a busy signal for a few hours? Presumably the idea was for O’Keefe to bait them by innocently asking if they’d ever had a phone outage before, to which the reply would ideally be, “Oh yeah, we took them off the hook during the ObamaCare uproar.”

Be sure to read Ace’s post noting the two subtly but crucially different possibilities here. If theory one is correct, that O’Keefe and company were trying to determine whether Landrieu’s staff had disabled the phones at any point to avoid angry voters, then arguably they didn’t “interfere” with anything. If theory two is correct, that O’Keefe and company intended to disable the phones themselves to see how the staff would react, well, that sure sounds like “interfering.” For now, only one thing is certain: David Shuster totally knows you’re guilty, Jimbo. Stay tuned.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

David Shuster is a weasel. Nuff said. I am willing to hear this young man’s story. To me he seems too intelligent to commit a felony or get caught in a moonbat trap. We shall see what comes from this.

Philly on January 27, 2010 at 9:10 PM

Either way, it looks bad…er, because they got caught and arrested.

If they had no means of actually tapping phone lines, then there’s really nothing else to it. Not even sure if there’s some kind of law in dressing up as a telephone repairman either? Perhaps unlawful entry/trespassing, but given that it wasn’t a burglary thing in the wee hours of the morning they may have some kind of protection under the First Amendment?

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM

Option 1: BAD
Option 2: REALLY BAD

Political stunt with no stunt double.

portlandon on January 27, 2010 at 9:14 PM

If theory one is correct, that O’Keefe and company were trying to determine whether Landrieu’s staff had disabled the phones at any point to avoid angry voters, then arguably they didn’t “interfere” with anything. If theory two is correct, that O’Keefe and company intended to disable the phones themselves to see how the staff would react, well, that sure sounds like “interfering.”

I have an idea… maybe they were just going to go back there and then ask them “Hey, has anybody been messing with this lately?” and then get their reaction…

ninjapirate on January 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM

MSNBC will not rest until the truth comes out… just like they did with the Duke Lacrosse scandal and when O’Keefe exposed ACORN!

mankai on January 27, 2010 at 9:17 PM

ninjapirate on January 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Or another idea… has a reporter just asked her (or her office) why no callers are getting through?

LastRick on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

given that it wasn’t a burglary thing in the wee hours of the morning they may have some kind of protection under the First Amendment?

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

If they had no means of actually tapping phone lines, then there’s really nothing else to it. Not even sure if there’s some kind of law in dressing up as a telephone repairman either? Perhaps unlawful entry/trespassing, but given that it wasn’t a burglary thing in the wee hours of the morning they may have some kind of protection under the First Amendment?

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM

The Boggs Federal Building is just down the street from Jackson Square. Why not just erect a gallows there and be done with the matter? Seriously, that is the way some of the rhetoric from those burned by the ACORN videos has been running.

Intentionally or not, O’Keefe points out a pet peeve of mine. The political class have managed to isolate them from their constituents. The anthrax scare was the final straw since you can’t even really send letters to the bastards. You e-mail them, they send a canned response (in the case of Virginia’s Senators the SAME response) thanking you for your input. At no time is the actual elected official ever bothered with the views of the electorate. That frees up their time to listen to the guys that give them big checks.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 9:20 PM

MSNBC = They decide the laws around here.

tetriskid on January 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM

Screw Shuster, Olbermann, Meadow, Schultz, Matthews, and the rest of the insane asylum inmates over there at MSNBC!

I am willing to give O’Keefe here the benefit of the doubt, especially if he can prove that Landrieu’s phones were intentionally turned off by her staff!

She’s a friggin’ Senator for crying out loud and those phones should always be on, regardless who is on the other end of the line!

pilamaye on January 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM

I know for a fact that Landrieu’s phones have been switching over to voicemail followed by a “mailbox full” message. I’ve heard that from various acquaintances in the New Orleans area, for weeks, since the Louisiana Purchase was, gag, consummated.

viking01 on January 27, 2010 at 9:23 PM

Thanks for overreacting conservative blogosphere.

russcote on January 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM

Thanks for overreacting conservative blogosphere.

russcote on January 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM

Yep. Linky

Geochelone on January 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM

This was dumb thing to do, and no matter what reason it was, it looks bad and dose sever damage to any future activity he may undertake. Also before he stated he had more stuff he was going to release. He said he was holding back on releasing it.
The Acorn stuff was great, but I doubt he has any more, and was bluffing. I like him but he is dumb on this one.

Ed Laskie on January 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM

Add six months of probation for the lamest story idea since gerbils got waterskis.

Chris_Balsz on January 27, 2010 at 9:29 PM

Yep. Linky

Geochelone on January 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM

Yep. Linky. (to myself. I don’t know how to link to the multiple times I said this last night on HA threads)

russcote on January 27, 2010 at 9:30 PM

Who has possession of the video and audio?

d1carter on January 27, 2010 at 9:31 PM

We already know that lib offices don’t answer the phones if they know their constituents are mad. These guys didn’t have to try and prove something we already know.

AubieJon on January 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Hmmm… either way it sounds stupid to me. but then so was pretending to be a pimp and going to ask ACORN for help.

Sackett on January 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM

It’s a plausible theory – but then … why was the son of the U.S. Attorney for Shreveport involved in this? Coincidence? He’s just a “friend” of O’Keefe’s?

I don’t buy that – Flannagan knew something – and I suspect it was Flannagan who proposed the operation to O’Keefe.

Flannagan found out something about Landrieu through his relationship with his Dad – something his Dad couldn’t (or wouldn’t) go after – and so Flannagan contacted O’Keefe to get to the bottom of it and volunteered to participate in the operation.

The connection between Flannagan and O’Keefe is critical – how did they meet each other? Did Flannagan see the phones being disabled in a previous visit to the building? Did his Dad have information that the phones were disabled? Or … that he had reason to believe they were disabled?

HondaV65 on January 27, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Like I said, they are being targeted because they are going after Obama cronies. This is a witch hunt people, and every day we will find out more and more that this is the case. Before the ACORN expose, if someone was told that O’Keefe planned to dress like a caricature of a pimp with a gorgeous hooker, and tell ACORN workers the most outlandish stories, I bet you ALLAHPUNDIT would have had the same silly questions, were they expecting ACORN workers to help them smuggle underage illegal immigrant hookers, well that is simply outrageous implaussible. COme one, that is what is so great about this guy, he tries new things. He tires things people don’t think folks will actually fall for but they do. S

immigrantchick on January 27, 2010 at 9:38 PM

It seems to me that OKeefe was simply doing some investigative reporting, you know what responsible journalists are supposed to do. Another thing I’m sure of is if any of the major networks or newspapers e.g. NYT were involved, this would not be an legal issue.

docdave on January 27, 2010 at 9:38 PM

Dumb: doing it in the first place.

Smart: getting the son of a U.S. Attorney involved in the stupidity.

RBMN on January 27, 2010 at 9:39 PM

But the trolls convinced me last night that they prolly were gonna murder people (most likely any illegal immigrants they could find) too.

I just don’t know who to believe anymore.

mankai on January 27, 2010 at 9:40 PM

This was dumb thing to do, and no matter what reason it was, it looks bad and dose sever damage to any future activity he may undertake.

Ed Laskie on January 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM

I disagree. There is a long history of investigative journalists doing this kind of stuff.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 9:40 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

No … they’re not covered by the first amendment.

Let me make something clear here – Nathan Hale was a criminal in the eyes of the British Empire. Yet, he was completely willing to pay the penalty of hanging when he was caught.

If O’Keefe broke the law in pursuit of justice and outing corruption – I say “Bully!” for him. What he did may have been illegal – but he’s willing to pay the price in court if the libbies have the balls to try him!

So try him you libbies! Come on! Get ‘er done! You’ve already proven you’re too coward to prosecute Bush for war crimes – hell, James O’Keefe ought to be easy pickin’s for youse guys no?

So come on!

HondaV65 on January 27, 2010 at 9:40 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Landrieu’s office was not a private “place of business.” It was an office of a public government servant answerable to her constituency.

onlineanalyst on January 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 9:20 PM

My wife and I send letters to our congress critters all the time. Results are usually canned replies also. I’m teed at Kyl because he never has responded, canned or otherwise, to a letter.

chemman on January 27, 2010 at 9:43 PM

onlineanalyst on January 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM

Absolutely correct … and … who exactly in this corrupt and crooked government does one call if their elected Senator’s phones are out?

Maybe O’Keefe was there to FIX the phones and see how the staff would react to actually having to talk to their constituents!

HondaV65 on January 27, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Maybe O’Keefe was there to FIX the phones and see how the staff would react to actually having to talk to their constituents!

HondaV65 on January 27, 2010 at 9:43 PM

I honestly think that was their plan if they actually got into the phone trunk closet.

teke184 on January 27, 2010 at 9:48 PM

Even this new story seem preposterous. I love the movie office Space too, but we shouldn’t be playing “Jump to Conclusions” so much.

chicagojedi on January 27, 2010 at 9:52 PM

My wife and I send letters to our congress critters all the time. Results are usually canned replies also. I’m teed at Kyl because he never has responded, canned or otherwise, to a letter.

chemman on January 27, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Couunt yourself lucky. Virginia politicians suck even more. It is clear that the Senators share staff to send the same canned letters. I never even here from my Congressman, Jim Moran, who is a socialist who hits little children.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 9:57 PM

Intentionally or not, O’Keefe points out a pet peeve of mine. The political class have managed to isolate them from their constituents. The anthrax scare was the final straw since you can’t even really send letters to the bastards. You e-mail them, they send a canned response (in the case of Virginia’s Senators the SAME response) thanking you for your input. At no time is the actual elected official ever bothered with the views of the electorate. That frees up their time to listen to the guys that give them big checks.
highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 9:20 PM

Hear Hear! And why is O’Keefe always referred to as “conservative” videographer, jornalist, etc…how bout just plain Jornalist?!? And where is the MSM hiding? Shouldn’t they be defending a fellow reporter?!?

MechEng5by5 on January 27, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Pardon me…”journalist”

MechEng5by5 on January 27, 2010 at 10:01 PM

Landrieu’s office was not a private “place of business.” It was an office of a public government servant answerable to her constituency.

onlineanalyst on January 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM

LOL! My career has put me in Louisiana for a sum total of six years with Landrieu as one of “my” Senators and William Jefferson as “my” Congressman. They have never been answerable to anything other than partisan politics. William Jefferson’s doesn’t even come close to addressing the corrupt machine that is Lousiana politics.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

Ha ha ha keep digging that hole, O’Keefe.

Keep giving him a pass or the benefit of the doubt, Hotair.

Dave Rywall on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

I love the movie office Space too, but we shouldn’t be playing “Jump to Conclusions” so much.

chicagojedi on January 27, 2010 at 9:52 PM

So long as we can continue to have a case of the Mondays.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 10:06 PM

Dave Rywall on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

Um…. This an American thing. No need for you hangers on to worry about it. It won’t affect the number of ways we subsidize your socialist society. In other words, STFU.

highhopes on January 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Keep giving him a pass or the benefit of the doubt, Hotair.

Dave Rywall on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

I guess if you’re a liberal, you wouldn’t have any idea of what ‘innocent before proven guilty’ means.

docdave on January 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Keep giving him a pass or the benefit of the doubt, Hotair.

Dave Rywall on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

ye ignoramus must have missed HOTAIRs post last night.

CWforFreedom on January 27, 2010 at 10:09 PM

Sooooo he was probably just violating the statute in a different way than we originally thought. And Hot-Airheads feel vindicated.

lolz.

crr6 on January 27, 2010 at 10:11 PM

Anybody try calling Landrieu’s LA office tonight?

Good Lt on January 27, 2010 at 10:13 PM

Sooooo he was probably just violating the statute in a different way than we originally thought. And Hot-Airheads feel vindicated.

lolz.

crr6 on January 27, 2010 at 10:11 PM

yeah he should have just stood outside a voting booth with a baseball bat, saying you will be ruled by the white man!!

then Holder would have given him a medal…

right4life on January 27, 2010 at 10:15 PM

Even the FBI and U.S. Marshals know this to be factual, that is that Landrieu has not been answering phones since at least Thanksgiving.

Kermit on January 27, 2010 at 10:15 PM

Ha ha ha keep digging that hole, O’Keefe.

Keep giving him a pass or the benefit of the doubt, Hotair.

Dave Rywall on January 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM

wasn’t Chris Dodd given the benefit of the doubt with his dirty loans? how about dingy hairy reid and his shady real estate deals?

liberal pigs are more equal than others..

right4life on January 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM

It’s possible that O’Keefe was after evidence that Landreau’s office was purposefully not taking any calls and that the office phones were incapable of receiving incoming calls. Thus the attempt to access the phone closet and filming the phony phone dudes dialing the office from their cellphones.

hillbillyjim on January 26, 2010 at 9:42 PM

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 10:17 PM

I think O’Keefe and co.. may get off.

I also think Dave and crr are the same person.

upinak on January 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM

I also think Dave and crr are the same person.

upinak on January 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM

Different people , just same marching orders.

CWforFreedom on January 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM

BTW, O’Keefe does NOT claim to be “conservative.” He said in his ACORN video that he was a Democrat.

leftnomore on January 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM

immigrantchick on January 27, 2010 at 9:38 PM

Impossible to believe, but as low as our expectations are of government workers, we still can’t even imagine them being as bad as they are.

See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

Nobody in their wildest dreams would believe these government officials would have engaged in something so blatantly illegal without anybody saying a peep about it. Now – because everybody has laughed at how stupid anybody would be who considered this even a possibility – most people have shut their ears to even listen to the facts on the ground.

Never underestimate the enemy. The people you need to pay the most attention to are the ones your enemy tries to discredit the most.

justincase on January 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM

This story is flatlining. Nice try, Left.

Now, since matters of the integrity of private communication are so important to you, let’s discuss the ransacking of Sarah Palin’s emails.

rrpjr on January 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM

AP…

We are all still drinking over at the SOTU thread.

Come back over, we’ll check this out later.

Seven Percent Solution on January 27, 2010 at 10:24 PM

So ‘looking’ at a switch box is “interfering”?

I’ve got a feeling this is going to turn into a “NEVER MIND”.

GarandFan on January 27, 2010 at 10:24 PM

Sooooo he was probably just violating the statute in a different way than we originally thought. And Hot-Airheads feel vindicated.

lolz.

crr6 on January 27, 2010 at 10:11 PM

Hey, it was a Democrat President whose Justice Dept. successfully prosecuted a female Federal employee for lying under oath about sex, and then said that he was above the law for the same felony offense.

You’re dismissed.

Del Dolemonte on January 27, 2010 at 10:29 PM

But isn’t it great we are talking about Landrieu’s constituents’ anger? I am in Georgia and I didn’t know about this until now.

Elizabetty on January 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM

Sounds like something I would tell one of my clients to say if he was caught trying to wiretap a Senator’s phone.

Squid Shark on January 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM

I’ll take door #1. I’m convinced Sen. Kay HAGan (D-NC) takes her phones off the hook.

SouthernGent on January 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM

But isn’t it great we are talking about Landrieu’s constituents’ anger? I am in Georgia and I didn’t know about this until now.

Elizabetty on January 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM

It is very widespread and Vitter’s office was swamped with angry citizens calling for a month to complain about lack of access to Landrieu.

Kermit on January 27, 2010 at 10:36 PM

Even if O’Keefe et al had pure intentions, what they did was incredibly stupid and inexcusable.

MrScribbler on January 27, 2010 at 10:37 PM

BTW, O’Keefe does NOT claim to be “conservative.” He said in his ACORN video that he was a Democrat.

leftnomore on January 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM

Huh? I thought he had been a member of the College Republicans while in school, no?

Dismembering/tampering an office’s phone system is really a bit pushy.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 10:43 PM

Okay, that makes more sense than a phone tap. A year or so ago O’Keefe and his team were in Snowe’s office giving her a hard time. See the second half of this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4hrnbhIHDY

pearson on January 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM

Dismembering/tampering

The document read: manipulated. Not the same.

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM

really a bit pushy.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 10:43 PM

ya think? /

CWforFreedom on January 27, 2010 at 10:48 PM

Sounds like something I would tell one of my clients to say if he was caught trying to wiretap a Senator’s phone.

Squid Shark on January 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM

Nah, the whole phone tap thing always sounded too kooky.

pearson on January 27, 2010 at 10:49 PM

Dismembering/tampering
The document read: manipulated. Not the same.

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM

Ok, tampering/manipulating.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 10:53 PM

Ok, tampering/manipulating.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 10:53 PM

No once was tampering mentioned; again, not the same.

He could have picked up the receiver and put it down, and the FBI would have written “manipulated”. Duh.

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 10:56 PM

I’m not sure what would have constituted “great concern.”

Yeah… that’s why you were confused and accused O’Keefe of ‘tap‘ping a fed phone line, in your headline.

Ugly on January 27, 2010 at 10:59 PM

given that it wasn’t a burglary thing in the wee hours of the morning they may have some kind of protection under the First Amendment?

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

The press always has more latitude in such matters…was just pointing that out.

Also, who qualifies as “unauthorized” in a place of business? I guess maybe those who don’t buy what you’re selling?

As for poking around, good point. You don’t walk behind the cash wrap looking at receipts and such.

These guys could have just been escorted off the property. I’m not sure they should have been arrested at all…maybe, maybe not.

Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 11:02 PM

Option 1: BAD
Option 2: REALLY BAD

Political stunt with no stunt double.

portlandon on January 27, 2010 at 9:14 PM

stupid, Jackass style stunt.

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

great question

funky chicken on January 27, 2010 at 11:02 PM

Or another idea… has a reporter just asked her (or her office) why no callers are getting through?

LastRick on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Reporters have asked, and Landreiu’s reply has been that the phones are jammed with people calling…hence O’Keefe’s “investigation” if you will.

uknowmorethanme on January 27, 2010 at 11:02 PM

Even if O’Keefe et al had pure intentions, what they did was incredibly stupid and inexcusable.

MrScribbler on January 27, 2010 at 10:37 PM

Inexcusable? Please.

Narutoboy on January 27, 2010 at 11:03 PM

MrScribbler on January 27, 2010 at 10:37 PM

Inexcusable? Please.

Narutoboy on January 27, 2010 at 11:03 PM

MrScribbler has a tendency to be a drama queen. Other than that he is usually ok.

CWforFreedom on January 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

No. But what they’ve done is a simple misdemeanor at most. That’s why the uproar on both the left and the right last night was sad, and funny for those with a brain.

How many times are we going to see the masses go apesh!t over some story the minute it comes out only to find out we’re wrong? Some people don’t learn from their mistakes.

uknowmorethanme on January 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM

MrScribbler has a tendency to be a drama queen. Other than that he is usually ok.

CWforFreedom on January 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM

House pessimist.

uknowmorethanme on January 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM

So if unauthorized people want to mill about and poke around in your place of business they are not doing anything wrong and covered by the first amendment?

Bradky on January 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM

And how would that apply to those who want to harm us? I live in Manhattan, unauthorized peole are not allowed to poke around in anyone’s place of business where they do not belong.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM

But isn’t it great we are talking about Landrieu’s constituents’ anger? I am in Georgia and I didn’t know about this until now.

Elizabetty on January 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM

Winner-winner-chicken-dinner!

batterup on January 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM

Let’s see. Current theory: They went in there to disable the phone system and watch/tape how the office people reacted? What did they hope to get from that? Somebody saying “Wow! What a coincidence! We just turned off the phones last week.”? Does anybody think these ideas through before they pitch them? Because if this is true O’Keefe and his buds have to be the stupidist wannabe journalists in the whole wide world. I’m not sayin’ he’s not (stupid). I don’t know him from Adam. But it would have to be one stupid guy to hatch that plot, for sure.

jdp629 on January 27, 2010 at 11:14 PM

And how would that apply to those who want to harm us? I live in Manhattan, unauthorized peole are not allowed to poke around in anyone’s place of business where they do not belong.

AprilOrit on January 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM

Indictments for 60 Minutes reporters?

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 11:17 PM

As you’ll see, an AP reporter who turned up on Matthews’s show this afternoon was apparently on the right track. According to a law enforcement source who talked to NBC, the point wasn’t to wiretap Landrieu’s phones. It was to figure out why so many people had trouble getting through to the office when they called to complain about the ObamaCare “Louisiana Purchase.”

As was a certain Hot Air poster.

Connie on January 27, 2010 at 11:17 PM

Where are people getting that they “disabled” the phone system? You folks are reading way too much between the lines that may or may not be there.

hillbillyjim on January 27, 2010 at 11:18 PM

Heh Heh, No baby,

I say send their punk assess to prison, period.

Observation on January 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM

“then arguably they didn’t “interfere” with anything”

The “interfering.” is in reference to manipulation the handset at the receptionists desk.

“After being asked, the staffer gave Basel access to the main phone at the reception desk. The staffer told investigators that Basel manipulated the handset. He also tried to call the main office phone using his cell phone, and said the main line wasn’t working. Flanagan did the same.”

Now does “handling” the handset at the receptionists desk and telling the receptionists the phones not working rise to the level of…………

section 1362

willfully or maliciously injures or destroys any of the works, property, or material of any radio, telegraph, telephone or cable, line, station, or system, or other means of communication?

I don’t think so.

Of coerce there is the more serious charge of operating a cell phone in a non-secured reception area of a public building.

DSchoen on January 27, 2010 at 11:33 PM

I say send their punk assess to prison, period.

Observation on January 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM

If you’re talking about O’Keefe and not the corrupt Dems in LA, you should be jailed for life just for stupidity.

Narutoboy on January 27, 2010 at 11:35 PM

I think Eric Holder will string him up by his thumbs, while letting the New Black Panthers’ voting day “indiscretions” slide…..

Vntnrse on January 27, 2010 at 11:42 PM

If Holder is wiser than he appears he will probably want to make this whole episode disappear. There’s plenty of unrest in the New Orleans region about how Landrieu cannot be contacted by her constituents. That includes Democrats, Independents and Republicans. Remember that Massachusetts is an indicator of dissatisfaction of ALL of those opposed to socialist health care. Landrieu has placed herself in the middle of that fight. If Holder really wants to stick it to O’Keefe et al then perhaps he’d best be careful for what he wishes. He just might get it along with a whole lot revealed about Mary Landrieu that Holder, Mary and shady Daddy-O Judge Moon Landrieu might otherwise have wanted kept quiet.

Remember how O’Keefe and Hannah slapped down ACORN… It wasn’t the first video or two it was their getting ACORN to climb out on a limb and make claims and accusations against O’Keefe and Hannah for which they then sprung further video evidence to exonerate themselves as ACORN dug themselves deeper into the pit.

viking01 on January 28, 2010 at 12:07 AM

I’m starting to feel very vindicated here. Granted, it was a previous poster who started it, that really got me thinking…

http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=297475#c8163134

Maybe O’Keefe is right, and the truth SHALL set him free. In that case, the rest of the LeftStream is once again going to have egg on their face as a direct result of James O’Keefe.

JamesLee on January 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM

Almost all Democrap senators were taking their phones off the hook. That was their MO during the health care debacle. We had no trouble getting to our Republican reps or senators. Got lots of kind letters from my Republican rep. The two senators sent out the same form letter to everyone. One was so arrogant that the letter he sent said that if I wanted to know what he was doing to check his website. He was off to Miramar extracating a US citizen. One that probably had really good health care.
Their arrogance was no secret. Maybe James was following up on some stories he heard, because that was the story of the year. Arrogant Dems pretending that their constituents don’t know what’s good for them.

BetseyRoss on January 28, 2010 at 12:58 AM

I think that Landrieu should be called the Louisiana Whore because she prostituted herself out the the pimp.

hamradio on January 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM

wasn’t Chris Dodd given the benefit of the doubt with his dirty loans? how about dingy hairy reid and his shady real estate deals?

liberal pigs are more equal than others..

right4life on January 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM

That’s what hate crime legislation is all about… making some pigs more equal than others. This is the double standard that is standard in this country.

A liberal reporter trying to expose corruption by the right is a hero. A conservative reporter trying to expose corruption on the left is a criminal. It all depends on your politics.

Liberal lives are just worth more than conservative lives. The liberal congress made it a law.

petunia on January 28, 2010 at 2:31 AM

Just picking up a phone and putting it to your ear can be considered “Manipulation.” The good News? This story will cause Shuster to go the rest of the way bats#it insane. So, I will put that in the win column.

di butler on January 28, 2010 at 5:15 AM

MSNBC = They decide the laws around here.

tetriskid on January 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM

NOW YOU KNOWN WHY I CALL THAT CHANNEL MSNBCIA!

BobAnthony on January 28, 2010 at 6:43 AM

It sounds like BS, but if they didn’t have a lick of wiretapping equipment with them as they were busted in the office, it might be true.

olesparkie on January 28, 2010 at 7:09 AM

Hey, Guys?

Where this happened is not a place of business – it’s the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. (Yeah, senator offices count as Federal facilities.)

All you have to do is just try to get into a Federal phone trunk without authorization – by any means,including social engineering – and you’ve broken the law. Being let in by an authorized idiot who believed your deception is still unauthorized access and you can be prosecuted.

This isn’t ACORN and it’s not a business. Being a Federal operation makes all the difference.

Like I said on a related post. This is a serious allegation. I don’t know what they were trying to do, but if it comes out that they were trying to get into that comms trunk or closet for any purpose, then hang ‘em.

Oh, by the way, did any of these guys have technical expertise sufficent to understand what they were looking at? It takes expertise to fix a comms problem, but no expertise is required to create a problem. Just pop the plugs.

I don’t trust anything in this story.

Cricket624 on January 28, 2010 at 7:40 AM

That darling sweet little boy, son of biggie dem., hacked Sarah Palin’s email…Wasn’t that cute? So industrious and innovative…..

nondhimmie on January 28, 2010 at 7:43 AM

You thought so nondhmmie?

In the mean time I have loved reading and watching the tempest in a teapot over this phone bruhahaha

Noelie on January 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM

Either way, it looks bad…er, because they got caught and arrested.
Dr. ZhivBlago on January 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM

—–
DATELINE: 1964 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. arrested in Birmingham, AL. “This looks bad.”
—–

Or not.

BigAlSouth on January 28, 2010 at 8:13 AM

Dem senators and reps aren’t the only ones making themselves inaccessible to their constituencies. Mine are all Reps and I NEVER get through to any of their offices via phone. Email is bot-replied by one. And snail mail gets answered with a form thank you by another. Is the system over-whelmed or is arrogance SOP in DC?

itsacookbook on January 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM

I’m just curious-wasn’t the siezing of tea from private owners & dumping into the water illegal at the time of the Boston Tea Party?
Just sayin’…..

Badger40 on January 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM

Heh Heh, No baby,

I say send their punk assess to prison, period.

Observation on January 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM

Where did all these lefty trolls come from. Maybe HotAir needs a purity test too.

MechEng5by5 on January 28, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Comment pages: 1 2