Revealed(?): What O’Keefe was really up to

posted at 9:07 pm on January 27, 2010 by Allahpundit

As you’ll see, an AP reporter who turned up on Matthews’s show this afternoon was apparently on the right track. According to a law enforcement source who talked to NBC, the point wasn’t to wiretap Landrieu’s phones. It was to figure out why so many people had trouble getting through to the office when they called to complain about the ObamaCare “Louisiana Purchase.”

Instead, the official says, the men, led by conservative videomaker James O’Keefe, wanted to see how her local office staff would respond if the phones were inoperative. They were apparently motivated, the official says, by criticism that when Sen. Landrieu became a big player in the health care debate, people in Louisiana were having a hard time getting through on the phones to register their views.

That is, the official says, what led the four men to pull this stunt — to see how the local staffers would react if the phones went out. Would the staff just laugh it off, or would they express great concern that local folks couldn’t get through?

I’m not sure what would have constituted “great concern.” Staffers asking how long it’ll be until the phones are fixed? Staffers bursting into tears at the thought that constituents might have to deal with a busy signal for a few hours? Presumably the idea was for O’Keefe to bait them by innocently asking if they’d ever had a phone outage before, to which the reply would ideally be, “Oh yeah, we took them off the hook during the ObamaCare uproar.”

Be sure to read Ace’s post noting the two subtly but crucially different possibilities here. If theory one is correct, that O’Keefe and company were trying to determine whether Landrieu’s staff had disabled the phones at any point to avoid angry voters, then arguably they didn’t “interfere” with anything. If theory two is correct, that O’Keefe and company intended to disable the phones themselves to see how the staff would react, well, that sure sounds like “interfering.” For now, only one thing is certain: David Shuster totally knows you’re guilty, Jimbo. Stay tuned.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

O’keefe and friends should have found a different way.

However, now they get to subpeona the staff and ask those questions under oath.

Or the charges could be dismissed if Landrieu asks.

barnone on January 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM

Stupid.

I’d find a way to hang out with Hannah more than wasting time on pranks.

jcrue on January 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM

This doesn’t look good for O’Keefe, but I’m sure it will be worse for these folks.

J_Crater on January 28, 2010 at 12:46 PM

Comment pages: 1 2