O’Keefe: “The truth shall set me free”
posted at 8:38 pm on January 26, 2010 by Allahpundit
The boss is skeptical, as am I. Remember when I said earlier that their defense would likely be that they never really intended to tap any phones but were simply trying to show how easy it would be to do so? Well, er…
An official close to the investigation said one of the four was arrested with a listening device in a car blocks from the senator’s offices. He spoke on condition of anonymity because that information was not included in official arresting documents…
ACORN spokesman Kevin Whelan said the arrest calls O’Keefe’s credibility into question, and used the opportunity to point out that he “edited (ACORN videos) to make things look as bad as possible.” He said, for instance, that O’Keefe actually wore a normal dress shirt when he was in the ACORN offices, but spliced in shots of him dressed as a pimp in the final videos.
O’Keefe, Flanagan, and Basel were all inside the building, according to the FBI affidavit, so the one with the listening device must have been Dai. Hugh Hewitt interviewed Breitbart about the arrests this afternoon, and while AB is crystal clear about that he didn’t know any of the other three men involved or what O’Keefe was up to, it’s less clear what the employment relation between them is.
AB: When the story came to us, what I wanted to do was to make sure that the ACORN story got as much widespread dissemination as humanly possible. The videos that he independently produced went on YouTube. And so Huffington Post, every single site put it out there, including my sites. What he does for the site exclusively is he tells his life rights, basically. So when he puts a story out there, it’s on the Brietbart sites, the Big sites, that he can tell people what transpired. So…
HH: Do you pay him for that?
AB: Yes.
HH: And are you free to tell me how much you pay him?
AB: I’ll…perhaps at another date, but he’s paid a fair salary.
HH: Is he…so he is an employee?
AB: I’m not sure that’s technically the thing, but yes, he’s paid for his life rights. And he’s, you know, he’s still…we reserve the right to say yes or no to any of the stories that he puts up on our site as we do to any other contributor who comes to the site.
It sounds like he’s an independent contractor, not an employee. Any criminal lawyers want to weigh in on whether and how employment status might affect potential criminal liability? Anyone? Patterico? Bueller?
Update: Re: the “listening device,” it’s possible that it was linked up to a mic on O’Keefe or one of the two fake repairmen, not to some bug that was meant to be planted in Landrieu’s phone. But it’s potentially important evidence, needless to say.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
CRR I have charged that you are a blatant hypocrite. I suspect your silence is an admission. Good for you . I think that is the first step of your new 12 step program . Congrats!
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 9:57 PM
Elysian Fields is a street in New Orleans, BTW.
teke184 on January 26, 2010 at 9:58 PM
CAN YOU STOP TYPING IN STUPID? I DIDN’T THINK SO.
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM
Yep, as far as I know SEIUACORN calls NO home. Weird, huh?
ddrintn on January 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM
[Comment deleted, user banned -- Ed]
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM
Seconded. Just let Janos have a monopoly on kiddy-fiddler jokes and eventually it’ll get the boot.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM
He’s done good works against the criminal organization ACORN, but if broke the law, even against Landfill, he should face prosecution. Regardless of his intent, if he broke the law, he broke the law.
Virus-X on January 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Great plan. Unless you get caught fumbling around half way through it.
JellyToast on January 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Oy vey.
Enoxo on January 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Two minor observations from lawyer–
1. “listening device” is so ambiguous as to include a cell phone, and
2. Brietbart would have to have knowledge of a crime, and consent to it (or do some overt thing to further it), to be complicit under criminal law.
Ragspierre on January 26, 2010 at 10:01 PM
If you’re asking to meet me in person, name the time and place
Bring your smelling salts, several hankies, and don’t forget your meds
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:02 PM
OK. That was cute, so for you, I stop.
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Isn’t an ipod a listening device? What if the crime was committed by someone else?
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM
You’re lying again: I made no joke; I made an inference. Try using a dictionary
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Heck, a glass against the wall could fit that description.
ddrintn on January 26, 2010 at 10:04 PM
ROTFLOL!
What would you do, wave around a misspelled sign and shout Limbaugh talking points at me?
If you’re asking to meet me in person, name the time and place
Good idea – I’ll need them after I faint from seeing your hideous face.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM
On that point, if the “listening device” was equipment for wire-tapping, or “bugging”, they would have been charged for illegal wire-tapping. They were not.
They were only charged with entering federal property under false pretense (which is a true charge, the two claimed to be something they were not… and O’Keefe was only charged with aiding and abetting the false pretense.)
I’m learning towards believing that the “listening device” was the audio recording that O’Keefe used in the ACORN videos.
Enoxo on January 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Next Up: The truth behind the Louisiana Purchase. What did they have on her?
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM
I was speaking with an officer last week about cell phones. He said they are actually classified as “data storage devices” or something like that.
JellyToast on January 26, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Now that would be just fine TK, hope yur right.
Rovin on January 26, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Probably 98% of our politicians claim to be something they are not.
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Brilliant observation!
And as a fellow employer I fully support them monitoring wayward employees. :)
Branch Rickey on January 26, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Given the move towards ever-’smarter’ phones, that would make sense. Even a phone with no more onboard static storage than its SIM card could contain a wealth of contact information.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:08 PM
Exactly: You are as you write: A Frequent Fainter.
Actually, you write like an uneducated wannabe who does not know very many words or how to effectively use words–so you turn to odd and outdated cliches and archaic usage. It makes you sound either a 90-year-old high school dropout or………
a girl who faints a lot
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Why go after Landrieu (spelling?)? She is just about toast as it is. I would think you go after someone who is can really be hurt by finding something untoward. Connecting the dots is a bit difficult.
And FYI, Rovin . . . Nixon’s problem wasn’t the Watergate breakin. It was the cover up.
Voter from WA State on January 26, 2010 at 10:10 PM
some info on Stan Dai (maybe)
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2010/01/is-this-the-same-stan-dai-.html?cid=6a00d8341c61e653ef0120a813e410970b
windansea on January 26, 2010 at 10:10 PM
W
What makes you think she is clean?
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:13 PM
hmmmmmmmmm. Something is up.
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM
Clean? I don’t think many long-term legislator is “clean”. I am fairly certain there is a certain amount of “dirt” on just all of them.
Still don’t think I would target her. I would go after someone who it will take dynamite to dislodge like the dope who is our Senator who is up for re-election. However, she is so stupid she probably has never done much with the piles of dirt you would find on her.
Voter from WA State on January 26, 2010 at 10:17 PM
This is gonna be good.
bloggless on January 26, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Sorry but I truly can’t believe that someone who did such an awesome job with the ACORN videos would miscalculate an important operation this badly.
He waited to release more video tapes until ACORN and Dems screamed foul. He was patient. James has another card up his sleeve and is waiting for the right moment.
GoodBoy on January 26, 2010 at 10:20 PM
On the “listening device” thing vis-a-vis a cell phone…
Cell phones could be defined very fluidly to make them fit into the “magic words” in a statute: listening devices, data storage devices, photographic equipment, computing devices, triggering devices, etc.
On the crime thing; you don’t have to be anywhere near a crime, or in any way act in the commission of the crime, to be liable under a lot of laws.
Ragspierre on January 26, 2010 at 10:21 PM
Ohh I don’t believe liberals care about anything more than pushing and achieving their own political agenda.
I just don’t want to hear them talking about “ethics” and “credibility” when they forgive anybody for anything as long as they tow the liberal line……
…..Roman Polanski the child rapist comes to mind.
When you sink so low that you will politicize a war with our men and women on the front lines:
Congressman admits Democrats “stretched the facts,” misled anti-war supporters about supposed plans for ending War
Submitted by Jeff Emanuel on Thu, 05/22/2008 – 8:18pm.
http://jeffemanuel.net/paul-kanjorski-pa-11-admits-democrats-lied-about-being-able-to-end-war-in-iraq
………..then you have no room to talk about “credibility” or “ethics”.
There is no lie a liberal won’t tell, and nobody a liberal will not stab in the back, in order to further themselves politically.
I hope the liberals don’t act “stupidly” and convict O’Keefe before all the facts are in or before he has his day in court…..
………but we all know they will….they always do.
Baxter Greene on January 26, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Will you be reading the Classics while engaging in fisticuffs? Will those ‘complicated words’ get in the way of your manly prowess?
Your threat was…..Less Than Threatening. Try again…
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Could you guys get your own thread somewhere?
Emperor Norton on January 26, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Well, now that you mention it, I might enlighten your shrunken redneck brain with a few quotes from Shakespeare before and after the event.
Not surprising. Nothing threatens a little worm like you until your internet fantasy is staring you in the face with an ice-cold grin.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Well “lib world” has not been going so good lately with Massachusetts going red….
…….Man Made Global warming being shown as a total fraud..
………..and Obama’s little fairy tale “Hope and Change” collapsing around him.
Yes We Can!!!!!!
Baxter Greene on January 26, 2010 at 10:30 PM
Sorry, Emperor Norton, but I couldn’t resist one last yank on his chain:
You’re kinda nuts, aren’t you?
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Ah, the anonymous federal official so full of important info in a criminal investigation that never made it into the report. Sure…
chicagojedi on January 26, 2010 at 10:32 PM
I’d love to know what phone calls the Senator has made since O’Keefe and Co. got cuffed.
Sorry for the unfortunate alliteration.
pugwriter on January 26, 2010 at 10:33 PM
looks like info in link I posted above is good, just saw Stan Dai on Fox and that is him.
more:
One Stan Dai was listed as the Assistant Director of the The Intelligence Community Center of Academic Excellence (ICCAE) at Trinity (Washington) University. The ICCAE says it prepares young people for careers in intelligence.
B. Career History• Mr. Dai has been involved in JSA since 2001: after attending summer school at Yale, he founded the JSA chapter at Naperville North, served in various Midwest region positions, and was a resident assistant at Georgetown.
• Mr. Dai was the first Assistant Director of the Intelligence Community Center of Academic Excellence at Trinity in D.C.
• Prior to that, he served as the Operations Officer of a Department of Defense irregular warfare fellowship program.
• Mr. Dai graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the George Washington University. He was the editor-in-chief of The GW Patriot, an alternative conservative student newspaper, a Club 100 Activist of Young America’s Foundation, and an Undergraduate Fellow on Terrorism of the Foundation for the Defense of the Democracies.
windansea on January 26, 2010 at 10:34 PM
Whoa!!! Internet tough guy…look out!!
BigWyo on January 26, 2010 at 10:35 PM
This story has legs, Christopher Reeves’ legs. Tomorrow is all about the biggest ACORN nut of all talking BS in front of a primetime audience. That’s why the usual libtard trolls came back today after 2 weeks of absence; they’re prepping their douche for the reaming they’re going to get after tomorrow.
Apologetic California on January 26, 2010 at 10:37 PM
Tempting.
pugwriter on January 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM
I’ll go one better. After the job J&H did on ACORN, isn’t at least possible that some whistleblower in the “deepthroat” mold would seek out James with something particularly relevant and maybe underhanded?
I am engaging in rank speculation here, admittedly, but I’m not going to throw these kids under the bus.
They’ve earned the right to be treated better by us.
russcote on January 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM
If Jana$$ is willing to pays his/her/its transportation and signs legal documents absolving me of legal liability, I’m starting a training regime tomorrow morning.
Otherwise, no dice. I’m certainly not going to squander much of my small savings on this, even for an immensely rewarding experience. And I’m sure as hell not going to risk a ruinous lawsuit and/or arrest. Not even pulverizing an Internet Mouth who slanders people as kiddy-fiddlers is worth that kind of risk.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:39 PM
I don’t recall inviting you.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Yea….maybe he could team up with Micheal Moore and they could have a “cut-and-paste..who can tell the best lies”
contest with this story.
….seeing that Rather has nothing to do and Moore’s movies are tanking left and right…..it would give them something to do.
Baxter Greene on January 26, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Impressive resume.
Let’s hope that the next entry isn’t
• Laundry detail. Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale — Oakdale, Louisiana.
justltl on January 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM
One of the four young men arrested has a father who is a US Attorney in Lousiana. You have probably watched enough episodes of Law and Order and Kojak to know that means somebody knows something.
Emperor Norton on January 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM
Oh darn.
pugwriter on January 26, 2010 at 10:42 PM
This is not good, and I think Michelle Malkin has laid out the case well.
O’Keefe did a great service with his ACORN videos, at least some of which, I believe, were within the laws of the states in which they were filmed.
However, you have to know when to pull back, particularly when a Democratic Congress is making (attempting to make?) alterations to existing law in order to target you and other, similar investigative journalists.
If this pans out as it looks to be headed towards (and no pre-judgment can be made), then there is no defense, in my opinion. Not only would O’Keefe have stifled his own credibility and effectiveness, he would have given an eager left the opportunity to discredit all of the work which has been so important in exposing and circumscribing ACORN and its associates.
Paul F. Villarreal
Conservative New Media
PhoenixUniversal on January 26, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Exactly. He has to have had something on them before going through with this. The odds of this plan actually working was very slim and they had to have known that the repercussions would be huge. If it did work and they found information that proved she was corrupt, they would’ve still faced legal problems. So that right there tells me that O’Keefe and crew were ready for some potential jail time.
Narutoboy on January 26, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Bingo! Let this play out…
NightmareOnKStreet on January 26, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Does yer mom have to be there to ref or anything???
Can it be after 10 pm or is that past curfew???
BigWyo on January 26, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Not smart.
This is the kind of sh*t that makes Americans look down on Republicans.
All the Republicans have to do is stand still and wait until the Democrats implode, which usually happens in short order. There’s no need for over reaching and criminal behavior.
OxyCon on January 26, 2010 at 10:45 PM
it gets better and better…………
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:45 PM
three pages of comments and (that I saw) not one comment on how the length and detail of this story surpassed anything any network ever did on the ACORN story.
MSM *sheesh*
inviolet on January 26, 2010 at 10:46 PM
If this guy doesn’t have “thug” written all over him, I’m not sure who does.
/is it really needed?
citrus on January 26, 2010 at 10:48 PM
In the interests of fairness, the ref should not even be able to tell either of us from Adam. Not sure right off who to ask, to tell the truth.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:48 PM
If the “listening device” is the same as used in ACORN expose & there is “evidence” that would otherwise never see the light of day in an Eric Holder- New Black Panther Anti-Justice Dept. maybe this is one way to make sure to get all the facts out. No matter what, let’s not throw James under the bus. We owe this young man more than that.
NightmareOnKStreet on January 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM
will your “regime” interfere with your ‘training REGIMEN’?
Dude, are you real? Or just Kinda Nuts?
kinda nuts……….
Janos Hunyadi on January 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Second. Let’s play this one out indeed.
russcote on January 26, 2010 at 10:50 PM
So threats of violence are ok I see.
Well off to report you.
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 10:52 PM
*$#@ spelling autocorrect guessed the wrong word. So sue me.
And as for being ‘nuts’…hey, I’m a mad scientist at heart (H2O cracking is a favorite hobby), want to build a mecha someday and discussed the ‘how to’ of building a no-kidding flying saucer with a few people back when I had a job. I passed the line of ‘normal’ about five miles back.
Yes, you are.
But the ref would be partly for legal issues.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:53 PM
I’m hoping it was the FBI that acted stupidly
tehd on January 26, 2010 at 10:54 PM
*snicker*
I’ll put my money on you being the guy that shows up dressed like Aragorn from Lord of the Rings.
BigWyo on January 26, 2010 at 10:56 PM
I highly doubt it. As much as I want to believe O’Keefe wasn’t stupid enough to try and plant a bug in a Senator’s office, he and his companions have been caught red-handed.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 10:56 PM
You have Dems stealing billions of dollars, SEIU thugs beating people to the point of hospitalization, liberals biting people’s fingers off, government takeover of healthcare, ACORN corrupting the election process across the map, politicians taking bribes, our ag covering up for black panther criminals, and you condemn someone just attempting to expose these crooks? Give me a break. You people can shove this righteous indignation crap.
Narutoboy on January 26, 2010 at 10:57 PM
I remember a “Dark-Star” on a surfing forum I used to regular. That “Dark-Star” was always a bit…unstable, as well.
selias on January 26, 2010 at 10:57 PM
Dark Star has been reported for his violent post.
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Don’t trouble yourself; already sent the offending comment to AP/Ed.
inviolet on January 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM
A bit too slow I guess. Well, can’t hurt to report threats twice.
inviolet on January 26, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Theory #17J… O’Keefe has video of Flanagan’s father requesting the boys to bug Landrieu’s office because a Landrieu crony just got the nomination (true) to be full time US Attorney for West. LA
phreshone on January 26, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Per the terms of use- Dark Star obviously has not complied.
Note :
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 11:01 PM
You’d lose your money. I’m fairly good with a bow, but being a swordsman is not one of the talents God gave me.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 11:02 PM
Actually it is much better
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 11:02 PM
And how many of those has Janos violated with impunity for months? Oh, that’s right, nearly all of them.
Dark-Star on January 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM
God, i really hope you guys are right…fingers crossed.
Equality 7-2521 on January 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Wait….am I missing something here???
BigWyo on January 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM
Hmmmmmm. One wonders if they were asked to play a part, thinking that after they were busted (yesterday- odd that we didn’t find out until tonight???) that some loose arrogant lips might start yapping on the phone, but that there was enough information beforehand for the real tappers to get a judge to tap some lines.
I will wait and see.
journeyintothewhirlwind on January 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM
Should be pretty easy to determine which.
The two possibilities are on a whole different level.
If the mic don’t fit, you must acquit.
When do we get to “Fake but accurate”?
MB4 on January 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM
It’s interesting the FBI somehow catches O’keefe but was totally absent in Acorn’s misdeeds’ I’m calling bullshit on this
kangjie on January 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM
I too am amazed at the number of “holier-than-thou” comments on here of people rushing to judgment.
I expect the Michelle Malkins of the world to quickly denounce these tactics because they are under such scrutiny from the left already and must maintain “integrity” in their reporting as to at least remain consistent, no matter what their off-the-record opinion is.
We at least owe O’Keefe a little latitude to hear his side of the story and not chalk one up in the loss column already.
Wait and see folks. Wait and see.
selias on January 26, 2010 at 11:07 PM
That does not excuse your violence filled post. You sound really young …I am serious. My kids rationalized like that when they were young.
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Dark- BTW AP put his foot down. You deserve at the very least the same rebuke.
CWforFreedom on January 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM
Yup. I’m glad to know that, while I’m in the distinct minority on this issue, there are others that see it my way.
I’ll say it again and again; these kids have earned better from us.
russcote on January 26, 2010 at 11:16 PM
Jindal won straight out. Obama lost by 20 points. Landrieu had the endorsement of moronic republicans who bought her moderate baloney.
Vitter will probably be reelected with 55-60% of the vote, and that’s only because of the scandal that he wouldn’t get more.
TTheoLogan on January 26, 2010 at 11:17 PM
Were O’Keefe and his crew looking for evidence of bugs rather than attempting plant them? Why would O’Keefe videotape the dismantling of the phone?
The jury is out on this one. There are too many questions.
O’Keefe appears to be a free lancer. Why would his investigative efforts implicate Breitbart?
onlineanalyst on January 26, 2010 at 11:17 PM
Hey … for me … I stand with O’Keefe on this.
He’s an extreme activist but he’s not stupid. There’s something going here and a nuclear response from ACORN and the MSM may be a part of his plan. He’s already proven he thinks several steps ahead of them.
The things that get me are the fact that, as the story is told, he was actually RECORDING the crime. That doesn’t make sense to me and I think he was actually doing it for a reason. Additionally – one of the accomplices was the son of a big U.S. Attorney for Western Louisiana. If that doesn’t set off alarms that there’s more to this story – I don’t know what does.
I do know that one of the things that James tries to do is to interrupt enemy operations through instilling paranoia and fear – thereby cramping their style and ability to carry out future crimes. This was one of the reasons for the ACORN sting – since now ACORN will not be able to be so “open” in their lawbreaking lest they end up on YouTube again.
James looks at this as a “war” … as do I. We already know that the Socialists will use any legal or illegal tactic against us – and then cover it with their propaganda media. We’re going to have to get dirty to get this nation back. Some may not like that fact – they may say it makes us just like them. Well – we’re not wearing Che T-Shirts yet (like them) so I say we can worry about that when it becomes a problem.
HondaV65 on January 26, 2010 at 11:21 PM
Landrieu is pretty much the only downside to living in conservative louisiana from a political point of view these days. The rest of the state is cleaning up, jindal is the man, vitter will be reelected, and new orleans is nutty as always. However, landrieu is a member of the old democratic guard that we have to get rid of.
I seriously think this may end up causing her to resign. There’s something going on.
TTheoLogan on January 26, 2010 at 11:23 PM
Sentence first! Verdict afterwards.
Twas brilig and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe
All mimsy were the borogroves
And the mome raths did outgrabe
Cheshire Cat on January 26, 2010 at 11:23 PM
In the end, it won’t matter much what O’Keefe’s intentions were going in. It will only matter how good his legal team is, because when you screw with a US Senator, any US Senator, they have the machinery at hand to screw you over pretty good.
RBMN on January 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM
Amen folks.
If you missed it before…I’m sure you both know it well:
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.
Liberty isn’t a joke. He wasn’t doing this for shits and giggles. Something was going on.
We need more, not less, James O’Keefe’s and Hannah Giles’.
russcote on January 26, 2010 at 11:26 PM
http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/source-close-to-okeefe-tells-fos-news-they-were-not-attempting-to-wiretap-phones/
This was up top. At the 1:28 mark or so the reporter says they were “held in the jail last night and not allowed to make any phone calls.”
Is this so that family and friends wouldn’t twitter/FB etc last night?
journeyintothewhirlwind on January 26, 2010 at 11:30 PM
Complete speculation – but perhaps his real intent was to get arrested and he wanted evidence that they didn’t tamper with the phone?
Thing is … after the scene in the office – the gang went to the GSA maintenance department when they should have known they’d be asked for ID which they didn’t have. It’s almost like they were looking to get arrested for some reason.
And now – after the arrest, facing 10 years in a federal prison – they willingly admit to entering under false pretenses … then O’Keefe says the “truth” will set him “free”. LOL – there is something going on here. Maybe he going to sting Eric Holder now!
In any case – let’s watch this. I wonder if Eric Holder will “drop” this case the way he did the Black Panthers? If he does – it’s because O’Keefe has some dirt.
HondaV65 on January 26, 2010 at 11:31 PM
Multiple choice question …
WHO WAS INTERROGATED BY THE FBI FOR A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME?
A. JAMES O’KEEFE
B. THE EUNOCH BOMBER
:P
HondaV65 on January 26, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »