Obama most polarized first-year presidency
posted at 2:20 pm on January 25, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Gallup reports today that Barack Obama has polarized the nation more than any other first-year President, with partisan gaps on approval ratings wider than anyone since Gallup started polling. Bill Clinton held the record before now, but Obama bested him by 12 points:
The 65 percentage-point gap between Democrats’ (88%) and Republicans’ (23%) average job approval ratings for Barack Obama is easily the largest for any president in his first year in office, greatly exceeding the prior high of 52 points for Bill Clinton.
Overall, Obama averaged 57% job approval among all Americans from his inauguration to the end of his first full year on Jan. 19. He came into office seeking to unite the country, and his initial approval ratings ranked among the best for post-World War II presidents, including an average of 41% approval from Republicans in his first week in office. But he quickly lost most of his Republican support, with his approval rating among Republicans dropping below 30% in mid-February and below 20% in August. Throughout the year, his approval rating among Democrats exceeded 80%, and it showed little decline even as his overall approval rating fell from the mid-60s to roughly 50%.
Thus, the extraordinary level of polarization in Obama’s first year in office is a combination of declining support from Republicans coupled with high and sustained approval from Democrats. In fact, his 88% average approval rating from his own party’s supporters is exceeded only by George W. Bush’s 92% during Bush’s first year in office. Obama’s 23% approval among supporters of the opposition party matches Bill Clinton’s for the lowest for a first-year president. But Clinton was less popular among Democrats than Obama has been to date, making Obama’s ratings more polarized.
Gallup makes a good point about why Obama ended up lower than George W. Bush. In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, the dispute over Florida’s votes created a huge partisan rift — but in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, that was set aside for a while. The polarization that would have normally continued otherwise may have equalled or bested Obama’s ratings, although that is difficult to determine in hindsight.
However, the polarization refutes the notion that Obama has done anything to change the way politics get conducted, both in Washington DC and the nation as a whole. His radical legislative agenda has infuriated conservatives and independents, as has the manner in which that agenda has been conducted. Obama claims that he has reached out to Republicans, a notion his surrogates attempted to reinforce on yesterday’s political shows, but Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid locked Republicans out of drafting the three main pieces of legislation pursued in 2009: Porkulus, cap-and-trade, and ObamaCare. That may thrill Democrats, but shrugging and claiming “I won” is not the Hope and Change Obama promised on the campaign trail.
Now for the bad news. Before 1980, no President had ever scored above 40 points in polarization in their first year on the job. Since 1980, only one President has scored below 40 points on polarization in his first year. Which President was that? The only President to lose his re-election bid, George H. W. Bush.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Solid B+
Cicero43 on January 25, 2010 at 2:22 PM
This is unprecedented!
fbcmusicman on January 25, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Yep, we all are sure polarized. We are all freaking frozen due to the government trying to take more then evah!
Where do I sign up for the non-polarizing trend?
upinak on January 25, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Unprecedented
BuckNutty on January 25, 2010 at 2:24 PM
I think he believed all the media hype. He seems to think that his “magical oratory” is like the Pied Piper’s flute. Sadly, he is not understanding that the majority of this country did NOT sign up to convert this country to socialism.
search4truth on January 25, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Odamna: “Let me be perfectly clear… This is unprecedented… Totally unexpected. If the American people better understood me, I would again be the object of worship and veneration.”
Crusader Rabbit on January 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Nothing wrong with Obama – it just means 77% Republicans are racists. /s
katiejane on January 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM
FIFY
Uniting the country was never part of his plan, no matter what half of the voters wanted to believe.
UltimateBob on January 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Does this surprise anyone here?
JAM on January 25, 2010 at 2:26 PM
No matter, polarization can be overcome at the polls with the ACORN and SEIU effect.
Fletch54 on January 25, 2010 at 2:26 PM
He has done the exact opposite of every thing he campaigned on…EVERYTHING!
jukin on January 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM
Gallup did a nice job leaving out Independants. Wonder why?
joejm65 on January 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM
And there were circumstances surrounding HW’s loss that I don’t see in this administration. There is a whole lot of speculatin’ goin’ on here with this that would not apply.
cozmo on January 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Who are these 23% of republicans who approve of BHO?
KeepOhioRed on January 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Unexpected.
SouthernGent on January 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Postpartisan!
farright on January 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM
AZCoyote on January 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM
The dirty backroom deals, the payoffs to big donors, the relentless elitism and vicious attacks against ordinary Americans who disagree with his policies. Chicago thuggery doesn’t transfer well to the national stage. We are not afraid. What created fear in his political enemies in Chicago just pisses us off. He’s toast, and he’s never coming back from it.
Rational Thought on January 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM
Unexpected!
Historic!
Knucklehead on January 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM
Historical!
RedNewEnglander on January 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM
The Audacity of the Dope.
Daggett on January 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM
And what was it that cost Bush 41 reelection? A bad economy and broken promises from the campaign trail. Hmm, sound familiar?
Doughboy on January 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM
They are the democrats who changed their party affiliation to republican in order to get McCain on the 11/08 ballot.
Christian Conservative on January 25, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Most of them are people who’re afraid the pollster will think they’re raaaaacist if they say they don’t approve; the others are Obama crotch-sniffers like Frum.
AZCoyote on January 25, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Not surprised!
becki51758 on January 25, 2010 at 2:32 PM
That’s the first question that popped into my mind.
tommer74 on January 25, 2010 at 2:32 PM
If post-partisan means destroying one party and turning our government into a one-party system, then yeah, Obamao sure is post-partisan.
UltimateBob on January 25, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Obama will just say it’s because we’re the party of “no”. Rather than realize bipartisanship requires working together, as opposed to a “we won” sit down, shut up, and just vote as we way tack. He’s an arrogant, insipid , jerk, who thinks the sun doesn’t shine in the morning til he wakes up.
capejasmine on January 25, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Of course, this is a result of the last 8 years, or something.
CP on January 25, 2010 at 2:32 PM
I honestly think Frum’s head is merged in the orifice of Obama. As are a few million more. That is one large….
upinak on January 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM
If Gallup did the polling, than I’d say they probably found some cooperative Republicans in some cemetaries around the country. lol
capejasmine on January 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM
I will never understand the cognitive dissonance that allows every one of Obama’s major policies polling at majority disapproval, yet he receives 57% approval for the job he is doing. That simply makes no sense.
How can a majority be against pretty much everything he is doing and still approve of the job he is doing?
Monkeytoe on January 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM
Kodachrome.
portlandon on January 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM
Also special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh leaking about the Iran-Contra investigation?
Wethal on January 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM
That can only get better for the GOP as more and more Dems decide to get their heads out of the sand.
fourdeucer on January 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM
Why this is the case is easy to answer. One party wants to expand the size of teh federal government and the other, when led correctly, wants to shrink it. These two views have no common ground; thus, the electorate is much more polarized.
The best fix is for limited government types to educate big government types that they would have an easier time implementing their big government agenda at the state level. They own the legislative and executive banch in many states, and there are less constiutional hurdles for them.
WashJeff on January 25, 2010 at 2:35 PM
and yet, NO ONE in the MSM will call him out on this…they believe it as gospel…
infuriating!!
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Not terribly difficult. Republicans, unlike Democrats, simply don’t hold ‘their own’ in the same sense of awe, letting them get away with any old thing. Check Bush’s favorability ratings with Republicans at other points in the last 8 years – did it stay near 90% at all times, no matter what he did – like Obama’s does with Democrats?
Midas on January 25, 2010 at 2:36 PM
This is an isolated incident…
right2bright on January 25, 2010 at 2:36 PM
that’s what gibbsy was indicating during his press briefing…it’s the (R)s fault for all the filibustering that was going on that nothing was done…
no one calls them out on this….
guaranteed this will be talked about in the SOTU
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:37 PM
Is this kind of like a flesh wound?
upinak on January 25, 2010 at 2:37 PM
This 57% number is bogus. Most other polls show him at or under 50%.
joejm65 on January 25, 2010 at 2:37 PM
Schadenfreude on January 25, 2010 at 2:37 PM
Schadenfreude on January 25, 2010 at 2:38 PM
they are probably afraid of being labeled racists by the pollsters…jus’ guessin’
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM
So much for chosing a light skinned …
trs on January 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM
ultimate in arrogance…i say let dear leader keep riding the train…
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Let’s put it this way: If the man had ever told us what he intended to do during the campaign, he would have received about 12% of the vote. And you KNOW he knew what he intended to do; he just never dared say it.
Now, he’s wondering why his approval rating is in the dumper???
He know. He’s just going to do as much damage as possible for as long as possible and then he’s “One And Done”.
GoldenEagle4444 on January 25, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Bush’s fault.
Cicero43 on January 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM
I can hardly wait each morning for Barry to tell me WHO I HAVE TO HATE TODAY.
Barry is polarizing? Who’d a thought that!
GarandFan on January 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM
I hope Obama comes through in the clutch like Bret Farve.
rickyricardo on January 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Time to move on from Bush… been a year now.
So.. it is now… Obama’s fault, but it doesn’t have the same right does it?
upinak on January 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Obama: “Let me be clear, I inherited this polarization from Bush.”
farright on January 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Why would Bill Clinton’s first year hold the record before? I would have thought GWB’s first year the record holder?
Sir Napsalot on January 25, 2010 at 2:44 PM
he’s acted stupidly
max1 on January 25, 2010 at 2:44 PM
Hahaha.
This reminds me of Spinal Tap.
“The opening act was so terrible they were still booing him when we came on.”
Chuck Schick on January 25, 2010 at 2:44 PM
“Our set was the apology!”
Chuck Schick on January 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM
I kind of disagree….I couldn’t stomach reading all of his books, but the parts I did read sorta spelled out what he had in store for us. Plus, add in his links to radicals and reasonable minds could infer that he was wayyyyy left of Hillary.
But I do agree if he had campaigned on his true intentions, he wouldn’t have received the nomination, much less the election.
search4truth on January 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM
Up next: legislation that will remove the right to vote from racists. Proof of racism? Didn’t vote for Obama.
wildcat84 on January 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM
lol
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM
It is infuriating, but I am pretty dang sure, by the donations from around the country that went to Brown, and are probably being donated to other Republican candidates vying for a seat this November, people see right thru it, and know where the MSM’s stand. They don’t like it so turn to alternative resources.
Everyone I know that’s conservative knows about this site. ;)
capejasmine on January 25, 2010 at 2:46 PM
Frum, Brooks, Sullivan, Chuck “Mad Hatter” Johnson, etc.
wildcat84 on January 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Increasing polarization ahead if he continues his wealth-distribution, punish the producers, socialist themes, including his glorification of them in Wednesday’s Liar-in-Chief speech.
GaltBlvnAtty on January 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Pooping on the heads of American citizens can indeed be polarizing.
Bishop on January 25, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Obama isn’t willing to work that hard to make that great pass. Nor is he smart enough.
capejasmine on January 25, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Obama: “My door is always open (to Republicans and Republican ideas).”
Sen. Schumer claimed cross state buying health insurance and tort reform were in the Obamacare (i.e., Dem ideas), but Republicans refused to participate.
Sir Napsalot on January 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM
No, I’m pretty sure he was confident he could unite the country … behind his socialist utopia. He’s the kind that thinks everyone that doesn’t agree with him is either misguided or dishonest. “Bitter” and “clingy”.
Count to 10 on January 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM
A friendly quibble: we were all aware (at least those of us absent a tingle going down our leg) of the vast gulf between Obama’s past and what he was campaigning on.
That we have proven to be correct is of little solace, unfortunately.
He will not pivot towards the center, he cannot do it. He is more likely to give birth.
*shrug*
Who is John Galt?
turfmann on January 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM
agree with you 100%…it’s the folks who don’t pay as much attention to this as we do who I’m afraid take everything in they see as truth and believe the MSM…
cmsinaz on January 25, 2010 at 2:50 PM
Most of GWB’s “polarization” was simply the result of Democrats’ throwing a tantrum for months when they weren’t quite able to steal the election in 2000. After 9/11 these relatively petty concerns were set aside, even by most Democrats, for a while.
As for Obama’s sky high polarization index or whatever they call it, it’s pretty easy to understand in view of Obama’s extreme radical left agenda, far more radical than any president in my lifetime with the possible exception of LBJ.
jwolf on January 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Therefore, Congressman Joe Wilson was RIGHT. He didn’t tell the truth…or the whole truth….and that makes him a LIAR!
GoldenEagle4444 on January 25, 2010 at 2:52 PM
Damn Barry way to hit the ground running. Over achiever.
milwife88 on January 25, 2010 at 2:52 PM
Ayn Rand’s Jesus.
Count to 10 on January 25, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Nope.
Ross Perot cut a deal with the Clintons. In return for running as an Independant, Perot would get the contract to write the software for HillaryCare and do all the data processing – a deal worth billions.
Perot split the Republican/Conservative vote and Slick won with just 43 percent.
lonesomecharlie on January 25, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Heh.
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 25, 2010 at 2:56 PM
Just a bunch of hillbillies that don’t read newspapers or something like that. /s
Electrongod on January 25, 2010 at 2:57 PM
Obama: “We shall pivot and focus on un-polarizing the country by
pursuingjamming through health care reform.”tommer74 on January 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM
This makes sense as few were ever all that excited about him. It takes a little excitement to get that kind of polarization and to get re-elected.
Esthier on January 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Meaning that only 20% of Democrats are not blithering idiots! I’m sorry but how can anybody give this President a positive rating for his first year in office. What has he done besides bankrupting my Great Grandkids, ignore Islamic Terrorism, take over huge portions of the economy and attempted to seize the healthcare industry? Anybody out there want to point out one positive aspect about the Obama agenda?
highhopes on January 25, 2010 at 3:03 PM
Part three of Atlas Shrugged: Ayn Rand re-writes the New Testament to her liking.
Count to 10 on January 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Bush was a special case. Kind of meh, couldn’t speak well or connect at any emotional level, and the folks who liked him well enough were pleny ticked off by a big promise with nothing behind it – nothing but the shaft for anyone who took him at his word.
SarahW on January 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM
I don’t believe he is going to moderate his position on health care. He will try to force something through that isn’t well thought out. Only dems not in fear of losing their seats will back him.
Mirimichi on January 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Heh Heh Heh!
highhopes on January 25, 2010 at 3:07 PM
What a perfect way to polarize a nation—spend a whole frikken year trying to take over the healthcare industry while ignoring soaring unemployment and NOW say you’re going to help the middle class?????
Is this jobs legislation frought with the same proceedures and substance you’ve allowed your inept congress (Reid and Pelosi) to use in their full partisan mode????
Who’s interest are you serving today Mr. Obama?
Rovin on January 25, 2010 at 3:08 PM
There isn’t any moderate position on health care. Either we socialize it, or we deregulate it: one precludes the other. That’s why the vote scrounging has all been corrupt.
Count to 10 on January 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM
No, I believe Jimmah Carter did also. Thank God!!
DanaSmiles on January 25, 2010 at 3:12 PM
Bill Clinton is a political opportunist. He wanted to pass bad legislation known as Hillarycare (BTW not nearly as bad as Obamacare). When that failed, he pivoted, blamed the GOP Congress for the failure, and moved on.
Obama is an ideologue. He’s more interested in the socialism than the political fallout. I’m convinced that if he had his way the entire Dem Congress would be lining up to drink the kool-aid in the political version of Jonestown. The body count would be irrelevant so long as Obamacare passed.
highhopes on January 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM
If you people weren’t such stupid bitter clingers, you would understand how brilliant I am.- Barack Husseiin Obama (mm mmm mmmm) Suuuuper Genius.
kingsjester on January 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM
More Hope…More Change…More Barry….bring it…please!
winston on January 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Fixed.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on January 25, 2010 at 3:14 PM
I inherited this polarization from the past administration
/Obama
NoFanofLibs on January 25, 2010 at 3:15 PM
His very “actions” have rallied the conservative base more than any other Democrat could dream of doing. I guess that could be called a positive projection.
Rovin on January 25, 2010 at 3:15 PM
This isn’t even remotely troubling for Barry because he knows he’s way smarter than all his detractors, and he will be able to con you into rejoining the church of Barry. What is troubling for him is he didn’t realize how many of us gun totin’ Bible thumpin’ fly over Rubes, there were. He’ll probably buy us all a gift subscription to the NYT so we can catch up.
anniekc on January 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM
There might be some middle ground in tort reform, or at least there would be if Democrats weren’t in trial lawyers’ pockets.
Esthier on January 25, 2010 at 3:25 PM
There is a book entitled Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. Although an old book, it is quite pertinent to the worshippers of the Anointed One.
Dhuka on January 25, 2010 at 3:30 PM
Obama’s 1st year Presidency most polarized
Wow! Another UNPRECEDENTED milestone.
GarandFan on January 25, 2010 at 3:31 PM
FIFY
Del Dolemonte on January 25, 2010 at 3:32 PM
But it was Obama that promised to bring us together; the left and the right.
Hope, no Change.
BTW; Hope is Not a Strategy is a good sales book.
barnone on January 25, 2010 at 3:35 PM
Hadn’t heard about that Perot/Clinton story, do you have a link or two?
BTW both of you are missing one thing-the economic recovery, according to the Fed, began in March of 1991, or 18 months before the 1992 election.
But since the media refused to report it in order to get a Democrat elected, the American public thought things were still bad, because the media told them they were.
Del Dolemonte on January 25, 2010 at 3:35 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »