Gov’t pulling out of mortgage support as home resales plunge

posted at 11:36 am on January 25, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The Washington Post picked a good day to report on the Obama administration’s decision to end subsidies for mortgage lending that kept home-loan interest rates low enough to incentivize sales.  Hours after its report hit the paper and the Internet, the National Association of Realtors announced that December sales of existing homes plunged at the fastest rate since the recession began:

Sales of previously owned U.S. homes fell at the fastest pace on record in December, though prices rose for the first time since the credit crisis began in August 2007, an industry trade group said on Monday.

The National Association of Realtors said existing home sales fell 16.7 percent to an annual rate of 5.45 million units in December, a sharper decline than the 5.90 million unit pace expected.

Overall, sales rose by almost 5% in 2009, but the bad December follows a better than expected November, when resales rose 7%.  That increase had people believing that the overall housing market would rebound.  The dramatic plunge in December will kill those hopes and leaves the Obama administration fumbling its attempt to extricate themselves from their artificial short-term housing incentives:

The wind-down of federal support for mortgage rates, set to end in two months, is a momentous test of whether the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve have succeeded in jump-starting the housing market and ensuring it can hold its own. The stakes for the economy are massive: If the market again falls into a tailspin, homeowners could face another wave of trouble, and it would deal a body blow to President Obama’s efforts to get the economy on track.

Keeping the mortgage rates at historic lows, which required a commitment of more than $1 trillion, was viewed within the administration as a central plank of the economic strategy last year, senior officials said. Though the policy did not attract as much attention as rescue efforts to bail out banks, it helped revitalize home buying in some parts of the country and put money in the pockets of millions of homeowners who were able to refinance into lower monthly payments, the officials added.

“We did what we thought was necessary to stabilize the market, but we don’t think the government should continue special efforts forever,” said Michael S. Barr, an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. “As you bring stability, private participants come back in. We do expect this now that the market has stabilized. I’m not going to say there will be no effect on rates, but we do think you are seeing market signs and market signals that there should be an orderly transition.”

A few federal officials and many industry advocates disagree, saying the government is exiting too soon. They offer dire warnings of higher rates and a slowdown in home sales. Fed leaders say they will end a marquee program supporting the mortgage markets in March. Obama’s economic team, led by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, has decided not to replace it and has been shutting down its own related initiatives.

Bear in mind that resale figures relate to closings, not purchases.  In other words, the resales decisions that get tallied in December are taken more in August, September, and October, depending on how long the escrow was for the resale.  As more people lose jobs, fewer are willing to both sell and buy homes, for the obvious reasons.  And resale prices fell over 12% in 2009, which makes new houses less attractive for those who want to take advantage of bargains in the housing market.  That appears to signal that the next couple of months won’t be any better than December, and could get worse.

Ending these incentives is probably a good long-term idea, but it would have been better to let the market deal with the pain rationally from the beginning.  As with Cash for Clunkers, this effort most likely generated far more decisions to move up purchases than to create purchases that wouldn’t have existed in the first place.  We could have saved the trillion-plus dollars this program cost, at least in guarantees, to right the deficit problem instead.  Now we will just prolong the agony, and spend 2010 with the same kind of instability in the housing markets that we saw in 2009.

Update: The AP doesn’t quite use the word “unexpectedly,” but they come pretty close:

Sales of previously occupied homes took the largest monthly drop in more than 40 years last month, sinking more dramatically than expected after lawmakers gave buyers additional time to use a tax credit.

Well, six of one …

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

We ALL played a part.

AnninCA on January 25, 2010 at 12:01 PM

That would be incorrect, Ms. AnninDenial. We ALL did not.

hillbillyjim on January 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM

What we’re still talking about? Jobs created/saved, which was always total baloney. It was merely about saving state services.

AnninCA on January 25, 2010 at 11:46 AM

The only thing it did was delay the inevitable. It allowed the states to continue their unaffordable spending for one more year, at the cost of another trillion dollars in debt. That that will cripple the economy for years to come.

MarkTheGreat on January 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Sorry, but the “socialists” haven’t had power long enough to blame them for the housing market problem.

The Dems ignored Bush when he warned them about Freddie/Fannie’s extension into the secondary market. He was right.

AnninCA on January 25, 2010 at 12:01 PM

Isn’t it cute when the socialists contradict themselves inside a single post.

MarkTheGreat on January 25, 2010 at 3:26 PM

It’s a small program that supports our kids. Get the banker snakes out of it.
AnninCA on January 25, 2010 at 12:14 PM

Classic ann, everything can be fixed if we just bankrupt everyone with more money than me rhetoric.

MarkTheGreat on January 25, 2010 at 3:28 PM

Let’s get the federal govt. snakes out of the student loan business. Student loans should be outlawed. Aid should be available in the form of grants for truly low income individuals (Pell) and military personnel (GI Bill), or scholarships. And whatever kind of grants the individual schools themselves wish to offer. If students can’t figure out a way to pay for their schooling through work, or taking time off to save, then maybe they can’t go to college.

And before Ellie & Co. swoop in to tell me how cruel and heartless I am, let me just say, I WISH someone had steered me away from student loans. They are EVIL, and it is an evil government, in collusion with Big Education, that has spooked several generations worth of 18-year-olds that student loan debt is “good debt” and that they NEED a degree immediately by age 22 or their entire lives will go up in smoke.

I’m not saying students are blameless; they are as responsible as all the greedy types that signed on the dotted line for mortgages they couldn’t afford. But just as with the mortgage industry, it’s the federal government — or more accurately, liberals in the federal government — who believe we MUST level the playing field for everyone. A college degree is a right, you know!

Watch the price of higher education drop to reasonable levels — prices average Americans can actually afford — if the government were to get out of the student loan business. The same way the cost of healthcare would go down if they would stop meddling in the market, and the same way we might actually see a recovery in the housing market and return to some price stability if they would just stay the frak out of it!

NoLeftTurn on January 25, 2010 at 3:44 PM

GrannySunni on January 25, 2010 at 12:48 PM

BofA will never process the short sale. Trust me. Tell your kids to find anything else, they have no hope of BofA closing that deal.

ORconservative on January 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM

Thanks for the advice. That’s what we’ve concluded also.

GrannySunni on January 25, 2010 at 3:54 PM

Probably trying to save money for the next upcoming crisis in the mortgage industry. These would be ‘option ARMS’. Lots of commercial property purchased with this 3 year old program about to ‘reset’ this year. This is where you took out a $3million loan and ‘optioned’ a payment, of say, $2,000 for the first three years (with the balance being added to the principle) before the ‘real’ monthly payment comes due after reset.

kens on January 25, 2010 at 4:41 PM

Still billions of worthless loans on books used as assetts to borrow cheap government money to lend out and get 25% credit card fees!

Our government isn’t smart enough to figure it all out.

Besides we got Tim the tax cheat, Obama’s strength in economic policies. ha ha ha ha ha ha

bluegrass on January 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM

Of course they would pull out. There’s no real equity to steal liposuction.

platypus on January 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM

“Mortgage Support” and “Cash for Clunkers” are government strategies analagous to the “hair transplanting” from one’s butt to one’s head.

The result is an illusion (it is NOT “more hair”), and the process is self-limiting.

…and the long term result will be a big pain in the a$$!

landlines on January 26, 2010 at 12:03 AM

Update: The AP doesn’t quite use the word “unexpectedly,” but they come pretty close:

I’m hearing Ed’s “Unexpectedly Good” phrase ring through my memory. And will he use it in his upcoming review of the State of the Union speech? I expect it.

leftnomore on January 26, 2010 at 1:50 AM

Comment pages: 1 2