CT poll shows support for ObamaCare crumbling
posted at 12:15 pm on January 22, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Could the same wave of voter anger over ObamaCare be building in another deep-blue state? The Yankee Institute did an IVR poll of over 1500 Connecticut voters to determine whether the state, represented by two Democratic Senators, supports the health-care system overhaul currently in Congress. The survey found what could be warning signs of another blue-state revolt:
- Connecticut residents oppose the current bills in Congress by a margin of 51-34 percent
- By a margin of 62-29 percent, Connecticut residents believe Congress has rushed the process and should take more time to get it right
- More than three-quarters of voters, 77 percent, say they are very concerned or somewhat concerned that changes in health care will result in more government spending, higher taxes, and a bigger budget deficit. 61% described theselves as “very concerned” about these possibilities
- Half of state residents say the changes to health care being considered will do more harm than good
That’s not all they found, either. Almost every question on this survey contains bad news for Democrats — and explains why Joe Lieberman wanted to slow down the process and work on incremental reforms. In fact, voters with an opinion on reform strategy broke almost 2-1 for the incremental approach rather than comprehensive reform, 44%/23%. The additional 33% with no opinion could very well be those who want to leave the system as it is; 49.8% said that government action will do more harm than good, and an additional 14% were undecided on government action. Only 36% said that government intervention was necessary.
In a recession, the idea of taxing businesses doesn’t get very much traction, either. Only 31% of Connecticut voters support tax penalties for businesses that don’t offer health insurance, while 44% oppose it altogether. That opposition jumps to 59% when the question of individual mandates gets asked in the form of tax penalties, and support drops to 24%.
Most interesting for such a blue state, the idea of expanding Medicaid to gain universal coverage is a non-starter. Only 26% support the proposal, while 47% oppose. The entire point of the effort was supposedly to get everyone insured, and even traditionally liberal voters in Connecticut pass on the idea of hammering state budgets to do it.
It’s not just one or two aspects of the bill that Connecticut voters dislike — it’s everything. If ObamaCare is this unpopular in Connecticut, imagine how popular it has become elsewhere. AG Richard Blumenthal has swamped the competition for Chris Dodd’s Senate seat since Dodd announced his retirement, but that may change significantly if Democrats insist on jamming this bill down America’s throat.
Update: Keith Hennessey declares ObamaCare dead.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The gifts keep coming this week. Thanks.
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Some states are just a little slower to catch on than others…..
UltimateBob on January 22, 2010 at 12:17 PM
My local grocery store is out of pudding this week. I’m not sure why.
lorien1973 on January 22, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Between this and the attack on the banks, Blumenthal is going to have some fun meet-and-greets with his constituents. I suggest campaigning in DC with lobbyists instead.
Vashta.Nerada on January 22, 2010 at 12:19 PM
I was about to ask about this… does anyone see Blumenthal’s 20+ point lead holding up if he’s forced to admit that he’d vote for this POS bill?
teke184 on January 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM
So this says that CT voters prefer the “slippery slope” approach to government takeover of our healthcare system, rather than a quick kill.
This survey is not the “good news” that it appears.
UltimateBob on January 22, 2010 at 12:22 PM
I wish somebody would start polling support for tort reform.
RushBaby on January 22, 2010 at 12:23 PM
I wish the GOP brass would coach the GOP talking heads and candidates to say:
X can be:
- Universal Health Care.
- Capping emissions of companies.
- Funding high speed trains.
- Green energy mandates.
Why do liberals not try to implement their ideas first in environments that ar friendly to them (e.g. CT)?
I know the answer, though, it’s power.
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 12:24 PM
But Keith Overbite tells me that the majority of Americans want the government takeover of HC.
txag92 on January 22, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Lets just say Obama is crumbling…period.
Healthcare……….Dead
Cap & Trade………Dead
Card Check……….Dead
Copenhagen……….Dead
Imigration……….Dead
Foreign Policy……Sucks
National Security…Scary
Economy………….What economy?
Deficit………….Hah!!
but he won the Peace Prize…
PatriotRider on January 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM
Are health care based lawsuits an issue in federal courts? I assume that most health care lawsuits happen in state courts. If I am correct, as a limited governmetn conservative, do we want teh federal government creating tort laws for the state courts? My answer, no I do not.
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM
Meanwhile, Sen Judas Nelson (D) NE is airing a new campaign ad in Nebraska. He is up for re-election in 2012.
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 12:28 PM
How can there still be 33% with no opinion? If they really have no opinion, how do you assign one as to leaving the system as it is as opposed to changing the system in some fashion.
fourdeucer on January 22, 2010 at 12:28 PM
That is impressive. What a legacy!
daesleeper on January 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM
They can file in either, and usually pick the one that gives them the best shot at winning a big settlement.
MarkTheGreat on January 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM
Grading on the curve gives him a solid B+.
Lily on January 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM
ROFL! We’ve still got some here in Illinois.. Funny thing though, I swear they’ve already been opened.
ReformedAndDangerous on January 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM
No opinion often means that you don’t support any of the options given in the poll. Do nothing was not offered as an option in the poll,
MarkTheGreat on January 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM
It’s all well and good to say that Sen. Lieberman wanted to take it slow but he still voted for it. That’s going to be something that won’t square with the voters regardless of how Congress folks try to rationalize it.
Cindy Munford on January 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM
In the federalism spirit, then I would only want the federal government to limit payouts awarded in federal courts. Let the states define their own tort laws, and many have.
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM
I confess. Couldn’t make up my mind. Tapioca? Chocolate? Tapioca? Chocolate? I dint think that guy at the store was watching!
GoldenEagle4444 on January 22, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Oh the irony.
National Health Care meets Death Panel.
fogw on January 22, 2010 at 12:39 PM
I know Dodd is a Democrat. Who’s the other Democratic Senator representing Connecticut?
MassVictim on January 22, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Listen up Dems. Passing bloated legislations that do nothing more than tax the hell out citizens who are lucky enough to have a job right now, is not going to put food on the table, or clothes on the backs of anyone. Working, or not. Get it?? Now back off the damn health care!!!
capejasmine on January 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Lieberman. He’s independent, but caucuses with the Dems.
capejasmine on January 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM
It should be unpopular in Connecticut… It’s a direct attack on the largest employment sector (although talking to my friends back there, not that many insurance employees realize it yet)
phreshone on January 22, 2010 at 12:41 PM
Can’t we just walk out on this bad horror movie “Zombiecare” that refuses to die?
Chip on January 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM
If anyone thought that California’s unprecedented budget crisis might shake some sobriety into its drunken sailor legislature, you may disabuse yourselves of that notion. Democrats have determined that this would be the perfect time to enact “free” healthcare for all Californians under a single payer plan. The cost to taxpayers? “An estimated $200 billion.” The bill has actually cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee with Dem support on a party-line vote.
I’m embarrassed to be a Californian. I’ve decided my state needs to fail, completely and utterly. Maybe when the entire state ceases to function the people who vote these reckless children into positions of power will finally start to have second thoughts.
Cicero43 on January 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Take the North East!
blatantblue on January 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM
On a related note, I read where Obama backs Bernanke’s re-whatever. I imagine Bernanke’s thinking “NO!!!!!!”
Oink on January 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Are health care based lawsuits an issue in federal courts?
–You generally have to have diversity (from different states) to be able to file in Federal court.
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Blumenthal can be beaten. He is as bad an AG as Martha Coakley. Maybe a better campaigner, but any of the Republicans running can beat him if they run a positive, issues-oriented campaign like Scott Brown and Bob McDonnell and Chris Christe did.
Biggest news today is that Larry Kudlow is not dismissing a possible run against Chuck Schumer.
rockmom on January 22, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Ever heard of Zombies, guy?
:P
blatantblue on January 22, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Heh… I know.
I should have used my /s.
Yet, on the other hand, he’s not a Democrat, and the writer should be more careful.
MassVictim on January 22, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Aren’t a lot of insurance companies headquartered in CT? Maybe they don’t want to see any more job losses.
rbj on January 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM
–The poll isn’t very complete. They didn’t ask people if they thought change was needed and, if so, whether a large, one-time change or smaller, incremental changes were needed.
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM
From the huffpo”
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 12:46 PM
Paul krugman has a article in the headlines up top “hey let’s just pass this thing” I tried to read it, but it’s to soon after lunch…It’s hard to believe that there are people who still advocate passing this nightmare…
SHARPTOOTH on January 22, 2010 at 12:46 PM
HEY OBAMA, CAN YOU HEAR US YET?
GarandFan on January 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM
I just read the polling questions and question #4 concerning a large amount of changes vs. a small amount of changes to the health care system generated the 33% response of don’t know or undecided and was logged as no opinion.
fourdeucer on January 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Public support for ObamaCare crumbling! In other news, the World’s shortest book:
“Why I Deserve the Nobel Prize” by Barack Obama forward by Al Gore
has received a Pulitzer Prize!
Put a fork in this socialist mess.
Roy Rogers on January 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM
What does “diversity” mean in this case?
My guess is that the parties of the lawsuit are in multiple states.
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
About the only entity holding out hope for Obama care here in South East CT is the New London Day paper. They are extremely pi$$ed that it is about to die. Oh and they absoluetly hate Joe Lieberman. Every time he is in the news is a guarantee of a venom filled hate piece about him in that newspaper.
Johnnyreb on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
But who should we send $$$$$$$ to?!?!?! We need to know, OC!
Abby Adams on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Just admit to everyone at HA that all you really wan’t is a gubmint hand out and be done with it…
SHARPTOOTH on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
yah know…I think Obama needs to shift a lot more to the left…
PatriotRider on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Agreed. I support incremental change, but the increments I support will not match what a “liberal” supports. This poll, as most polls seem to do, does not ask about these details.
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 12:52 PM
But who should we send $$$$$$$ to?!?!?! We need to know, OC!
Abby Adams on January 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM
sharptooth…(lol)
SHARPTOOTH on January 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM
I wonder how long till the Kos creeps break under the cognitive dissonance of attacking blue states in the Northeast.
Anyone with a mental disease knows when you start to think your best friends are against you, it’s time to consider that it might be YOU who’s the whack job.
Got that, Kos kids?
jeff_from_mpls on January 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM
All your pudding are belong to us!
Christien on January 22, 2010 at 12:54 PM
Touche.
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM
The bills we know as Obamacare may, in fact, be dead, but Democrats will work overtime to get something they can call “heath care reform” through Congress. After all, Obama said he was against ramming through a bill BEFORE Scott Brown was seated. He didn’t say he was against ramming through a bill period. And Pelosi said she doesn’t have the votes to pass the Senate version. She didn’t say she doesn’t have the votes to pass something/anything. All I’m saying is watch out for Son of Obamcare – coming soon to a Congress near you.
Fred 2 on January 22, 2010 at 12:56 PM
If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding
How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat
lorien1973 on January 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Zuckerman, and pretty much the rest of America, were given the impression that lowering costs was their top priority.
It really is.
I, for one, believe that will change in any case. Rather than arrest Dodd for his crimes, AG Blumenthal praised him and further, said he aspires to Dodd’s record and achievement. In short, he aspires to massive corruption, cronyism and fraud, and intends to help create another economic crisis? Awesome.
If the GOP candidates can’t convince CT voters that Blumenthal has a fundamental misunderstanding of economics and what created this crisis, and that he is nothing but a Dodd clone, then they may as well hang it up.
Rae on January 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM
More from huffpo:
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Definitely some interesting results.
An earlier poll (taken after the Senate passed its bill, and before the MA Senate election) showed Lieberman’s favorability rating way down, possibly because Lieberman angered liberals with his initial opposition to the health-care bill due to high costs, and then voted FOR the bill with special favors for Nebraska and Louisiana.
A Rasmussen poll taken after Dodd’s retirement announcement and before the MA vote showed Blumenthal with huge leads, but neither Blumenthal (currently CT Attorney General) nor his GOP opponents have taken a clear position on the health-care bill. It would be interesting to hear what Blumenthal and his strongest opponent (former Rep. Rob Simmons, R-CT2) have to say about health care.
After having lived in CT for 14 years, I’ve found some strange tendencies in elections here. This is the home of Yale, and even affluent voters (who ordinarily favor low-tax, pro-business Republicans elsewhere) seem to vote Democrat out of “charity”, a desire to “share” their wealth with the less fortunate elsewhere in the nation. Yet, they have had Republican Governors for 16 years (Rowland for 2 1/2 terms, Jodi Rell for 1 1/2 terms) who continually fight to reduce State spending by vetoing overbloated budgets from the Democrat-controlled State legislature. CT voters seem to be fine with the Federal government raising taxes on the whole country, but not with the State government raising State taxes. Taxes for thee, not for me.
Blue-state MA voters saw Scott Brown as a huge opportunity to block ObamaCare, and this Yankee poll shows CT voters even MORE opposed than MA voters to ObamaCare. But with Brown soon to be in the Senate, will CT voters decide that THEIR Senator has to be on Brown’s side (not only on health care, but also on Federal spending and military preparedness, as Rob Simmons advocates), or is Brown alone enough to stop ObamaCare, and will they support Blumenthal?
In MA, Martha Coakley (D) was State Attorney General, Scott Brown (R) was a State Senator, who, in addition to opposing ObamaCare, also supports increased military spending. He was 20 points down a month before the election, but surged to win in the end.
In CT, Blumenthal (D) is State Attorney General, Rob Simmons (R) is a three-term former U.S. Congressman. His Eastern CT district is mostly rural and suburban, with a large naval base (Groton), which Simmons has used to promote increased military spending. He is now about 20 points down in the polls, with the election over 9 months away. Any parallels here?
Steve Z on January 22, 2010 at 1:01 PM
These results and the MA election results are valid indicators that there is a clear disconnect between Obama and his policies. These states were willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but the response to his policies are the best litmus test to perform upon his presidency. If, in the bluest of states, his signature efforts are falling apart–then the next question is, where can he succeed? Certainly not in red states, and certainly not nationally. His policies, not his persona, are now demonstrated to be a clear mismatch for the values of the United States of America. The blue and the red and united in opposition to his policies. He should begin looking for another job because his employers are unhappy with his performance.
ted c on January 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Yeah–a curve big enough to warp space like around a neutron star.
Liam on January 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM
You!
Yes, you!
Stand still laddie!
jeff_from_mpls on January 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM
If Liebs had gone along with the Medicare add on or the public option we’d already have watched in horror as Obama signed that dog of a bill already.
I was pretty upset (and emailed him about a gazillion times) he didn’t just kill this sick puppy when he had the chance, but I think his insistence helped deflate momentum. At least the dems are convinced Lieberman was the ax man and are putting most of the blame on him…which, according to this poll, will only help him in the end.
marybel on January 22, 2010 at 1:04 PM
I will use Day ol’ Banna pudin’
WashJeff on January 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM
–If you really think that, then you’ve misunderstood what I’ve been writing. I wasn’t for the public option and I wasn’t for free health care. What I was for was the insurance exchanges (and start up funding for them) and the elimination of the pre-existing condition exclusion in return for mandatory participation. And I was for an expanded risk pool with premiums set by the large pool.
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Since this thread is about CT, send your $$$ to Rob Simmons (R), former three-term Congressman from CT-2 (eastern third of the state), who even in the 2006 debacle only lost re-election by about 100 votes. He is by far the best candidate with a chance at taking
Dodd’sthe Connecticut People’s Senate seat.Steve Z on January 22, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Agreed. There’s another issue that can be used against Blumenthal in CT. In recent years, several nuclear power plants have been shut down, and new natural-gas fired plants have been built to supply the needed electricity, but this has caused natural-gas prices to rise in a cold state where most homes are heated with natural gas.
There was a recent project to build a large LNG (liquefied-natural-gas) terminal in the Long Island Sound, to provide natural gas imported by tankers to Long Island and southern Connecticut, which was blocked practically single-handedly by Blumenthal, supposedly for “environmental” reasons. People in the energy industry hate Blumenthal, and we really do need the gas, so this issue could be used by Republicans to hurt Blumenthal. Now that the Supreme Court has allowed corporations to run campaign ads, the natural-gas industry should be all over this issue!
By the way, is rockmom from CT? Where?
Steve Z on January 22, 2010 at 1:24 PM
You can all thank me “CT Stealth Conservative” helping my fellow Nutmeggers realize they’re actually conservative. It’s a hard job – but someone has to do it.
In all seriousness my partner started encountering anti-Obama/Dem policy shortly after Jan 2009. I started seeing it about 4 months later.
You know the tide is changing when you’re in the New Britain Walmart having a ‘what the heck is the govt doing’ conversation in public.
Sandy
hotdax on January 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM
huffpo article:
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM
What the Progressives aren’t going to try and run Ned Lamont again….really Lieberman went ROGUE and retained his Senate Seat in CT with a lot of help from Imus who has a residence in CT. The battle for the Democrat Party is so old, and it never gets reported on. I get to read and hear about how the Republicans are in disarray all the time.
Maybe the blogosphere thinks it’s common knowledge but it’s not. The people who voted for Obama/Biden have to have stick figure drawings to explain – show them, what’s going on inside the Democrat Party. Then they have to have it shown to them multiple times, till they get there is a consensus about the state of the Democrat Party, the HERD WON’T TURN ITSELF:) It was herd mentality that got Obama/Biden elected.
Dr Evil on January 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM
Nobel Peace Prize Committee is on the phone Mr.Obama, something about a do over.
la.rt.wngr on January 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM
Actually, it was the piss prize, but the Norwegians pronounce it “peese”.
SKYFOX on January 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM
Mark, I think you and Chuck were wondering yesterday where I got my numbers on the additional cost of “guaranteed issue”.
The information on the WellPoint website is here: http://www.wellpoint.com/newsroom/stats_facts.asp. I hope the link works.
If you look at the individual analysis, their data assumes an increase of from 20-80%. That’s only the piece for guaranteed issue and it assumes no effective participation mandate.
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 1:35 PM
The progressive liberals should be all over this outrageous attempt by evil pudding makers to drive up pudding prices and deny people of their right to pudding.
ClanDerson on January 22, 2010 at 1:37 PM
My local grocery store is out of pudding this week. I’m not sure why.
lorien1973 on January 22, 2010 at 12:18 PM
The progressive liberals should be all over this outrageous attempt by evil pudding makers to drive up pudding prices and deny people of their right to pudding.
ClanDerson on January 22, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Obviously, there needs to be a tax levied on pudding manufacturers to remedy this catastrophy.
la.rt.wngr on January 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Can we get numbers for government extervention?
Count to 10 on January 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM
–Proof that conservatives/libertarians used drugs when listening to Pink Floyd? And still do?
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM
They should love tort reform.
the_nile on January 22, 2010 at 2:04 PM
Ben feels the hounds baying at his heels. Local news(Channel 10/11)announced last night that he and Johanns are co-sponsoring a bill to attempt to defang the EPA on it’s CO2 contamination end run around cap and trade. He’s searching for cover and not eating out.
a capella on January 22, 2010 at 2:10 PM
–You can only guess in that poll. Here are links to others: http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_health_care_kaiser_1712.php; http://www.pollingreport.com/health.htm. Bottom line: It looks like people do like some aspects of ObamaCare, but it’s tough to tell whether they think reform is needed. (Remember that CT is the headquarters of many insurance companies. I think MN may also have a bunch, so I’d be interested in how this plays out in MN if I remember right).
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 2:13 PM
Ace told me so, you see, I’m a moron.
Holger on January 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM
Won’t find cover, and won’t be able to eat out in NE. Better get his fill of restaurants in DC.
OmahaConservative on January 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Wow, even you’re firing blanks on healthcare now. Far better than the usual round of lies but not effective. Nobody, including the GOP, has been against some reform- just not the massive takeover proposed by this administration and his corrupt party.
I will not take Obama or Democrats seriously on the issue of healthcare reform until they put tort reform as the first priority to fix the system.
highhopes on January 22, 2010 at 2:16 PM
In the “Hall of Accomplishments” at the Obama Presidential Museum, there will be pictures from the inaguration, a case containing his Peace Prize, and a whole lot of empty space.
highhopes on January 22, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Right now, 0bama is in Elyria, OH campaigning and pushing health care reform. He just doesn’t get it.
Mirimichi on January 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM
Because it’s common knowledge that the entire bill will make things much worse, Jimbo.
Chuck Schick on January 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM
–Take a look at these polls. I don’t know whether people are in favor of doing something or nothing. They’re all over the map.
Tort reform (in the form of caps on non-economic damages) is already in place in more than half the states and the ObamaCare bill had a mediation-type process in it that should end some frivolous lawsuits in the other cases. The only thing it didn’t have in it was non-economic damage caps for the roughly 20 remaining states. I wouldn’t look for a magic bullet there.
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 2:56 PM
The tort reform in ObamaCare is a pilot program as are the programs to bring down costs.
They’re worthless Jimbo. You’re not going to get your grubby little hands on other people’s money. Just let it go.
Chuck Schick on January 22, 2010 at 3:09 PM
–So you’d require states to adopt these program or what? Have the federal army come in and take them over? And if you can require states to do this, why can’t I require states to fund high risk pools?
Jimbo3 on January 22, 2010 at 3:22 PM
hotdax on January 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM
BetseyRoss on January 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Connecticut isn’t just a very Blue state; it’s home to a large number of insurance companies. One can only hope these generally deluded people (i.e. Dems) still have some shred of awareness of where their self-interest sits. One can never be sure with supporters of Progressives, though.
JDPerren on January 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM
No that’s your fantasy.
I’m the one reminding your praise of ObamaCare is based on blind party allegiance.
The bill is simply counter-productive. Let it go and start over Jimbo.
Chuck Schick on January 22, 2010 at 4:01 PM
And voted for them anyway – even on a Saturday – rushing back from religious services.
Oopsdaisy on January 22, 2010 at 4:06 PM
Because that would be a violation of the Constitutional rights of individuals.
What is the source of this insatiable desire to control the choices of others, despite the clear historical evidence that it never leads to the practical benefits you claim to want?
JDPerren on January 22, 2010 at 4:32 PM
I finally understand why Obama got the Peace Prize for his policies:
“Dead” is as peaceful as you can get!!
landlines on January 22, 2010 at 6:46 PM
Oh to imagine my State being represented by Republicans. I will happily vote against that moron Blumenthal. Now if we can just get good ole’ Joe out of the box next. A little note to Chris Murphy (your time is coming in November, better start making plans for other employment).
wfiguy on January 22, 2010 at 10:08 PM