Video: Theissen rips Amanpour on false reporting

posted at 10:12 am on January 21, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

This is an amazing nine minutes of video, with most of the fireworks coming in the second half. Marc Thiessen rips Christiane Amanpour for falsely reporting that the CIA use of waterboarding was the same as the Khmer Rouge technique for submerging people in boxes of water — and when he does, her other guest, Phillipe Sands, accuses Thiessen of cowardice. Sands also engages in a bit of intellectual cowardice himself by saying “some” would accuse Thiessen of complicity in torture by writing about it, while hastening to assure everyone that Sands himself would never dream of such as suggestion. It’s a tour de force of stupid on the part of CNN, and Amanpour makes it worse when she continues to talk over Thiessen rather than let him make his point:

It calms down a little in the second half, but Thiessen takes control of the debate rather well. And the last question Thiessen gets to ask is simply a game-over moment. “Which of these attacks would you prefer we hadn’t stopped?” Sands says it’s a fallacy, but the fact remains that those interrogations stopped those attacks — and without them, we would have been blind to the plots.

Don’t miss the part where Amanpour wonders why we don’t just arrest terrorists and stick them in prison “until the end of the war,” either. The Bush administration did do that — in Guantanamo Bay. Obama wants to let most of them go, and Amanpour has certainly been one of the cheerleaders of that effort, too.

As for the Geneva Convention, Marc has it exactly correct, but the effort by Amanpour and the most of the media in desperately demanding that the US apply those standards to terrorists and unlawful combatants has made it much more likely that we’ll simply kill terrorists rather than capture them and get that kind of critical information. That may feel more satisfying, but it leaves us unable to connect the dots.

Be sure to read Marc’s book, Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama Is Inviting the Next Attack. RedState and Human Events has more.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

This is must watch.
Excellent!

BobH on January 21, 2010 at 10:18 AM

That may feel more satisfying, but it leaves us unable to connect the dots.

I vote satisfying…Theve shown they can’t connect the dots.

SHARPTOOTH on January 21, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Damn! No YouTube at work. Anyone know if this is available on the CNN site?

Doughboy on January 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM

I remember seeing Amanpour in an interview once, years ago, talking about how the idiotic U.S. government was keeping her and her crew from going into some hot area in Bosnia or some other war zone. She was incredibly arrogant, insisting that she knew more about the situation on the ground that any government or military official ever could, and how dare those dolts not recognize her vastly superior intelligence and knowledge. She really is an ass.

AZCoyote on January 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM

wow.

Slightly OT, but has anyone seen the History Channel’s presentation called “Presidents”…I watched Bush/Clinton/GWBush last night.
They flat out Lied when they got to GWBush. It was quite troubling.
They said he “ignored the Geneva conventions” and showed pics of Abu Grabby (sp? lol)….huh? Made it sound like he ordered the silly antics of those prison guards.

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM

Amanpour is a wh0re for the Palestinians and their brethren.

thomasaur on January 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM

Epic PWNAGE!

SouthernGent on January 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM

Doughboy on January 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM

I have the same problem.

SHARPTOOTH on January 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM

Gitmo will outlast its naive critics.

As America will outlast Islamic imperialism.

No thanks to Obama and his Blinders-On-Tight! Crew.

profitsbeard on January 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM

Amanpour is the jihad terror network media queen. A modern day Tokyo Rose.

Fletch54 on January 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Way to go, Marc! VERY well done.

Anonymous Finch on January 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Is waterboarding torture?

YES!#@!@!eleventy!@!@!!!!111

We waterboard our troops in training. Are we torturing our troops?

THAT’S DIFFERENT!@!$ YOU SUPPORT TORTURE!@!!$!@!

No, it’s not different. It’s all waterboarding. If it were torture, it would be illegal to do to our own troops. Are we torturing our troops?

STOP SPLITTING HAIRS!@!#!@!$111 TORTURERE!@#!%!111

Presto. The left’s favorite whine is exposed as the idiocy and lie that it is.

Next.

Good Lt on January 21, 2010 at 10:25 AM

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM

I’ve taken to calling it “Revisionist History Channel”. By the by they’re part of NBC.

thomasaur on January 21, 2010 at 10:25 AM

They worry about connecting the dots when there is a Republican to bash. They also worry about the terrorists rights when there is a republican to bash. What they don’t worry about is the little Americans who would be killed in these attacks.

Howcome on January 21, 2010 at 10:25 AM

Sticking a forceps into the back of a babies skull and sucking its brains out is a right but pouring water over the face of a murderer is torture. God, I hate these people with all my soul.

trs on January 21, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Sorry, I never was overly worried about waterboarding the terrorists, since I don’t care about them or have a sympathetic bone in my body for them. Neither am I interested in defending the procedure, since there seems to be some legitimate debate as to the effectivity and the quality of information gained from the procedure.

Mostly, I’m not interested in that issue at this point. It’s a bit like talking about Clinton’s penis decades later. LOL*

I am very interested in the upcoming trial and what that will bring and the issue of who exactly took over with the Christmas bomber and why didn’t Napolitano have authority?

I don’t get that at all.

AnninCA on January 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM

Excellent smackdown….done with the pure facts

PatriotRider on January 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM

Christiane Amanpour is the poster girl for insufferably arrogant and condescending journalists everywhere.

Bruno Strozek on January 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Very well done. To use the word “torture” to describe waterboarding as we practice it is ridiculous. If involuntary unpleasant experiences at the hands of your captor are torture, so are felonies like beatings and rapes which DO have long-term physical effects.

Laura on January 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Slightly OT, but has anyone seen the History Channel’s presentation called “Presidents”…I watched

Bush/Clinton/GWBush last night.
They flat out Lied when they got to GWBush. It was quite troubling.
They said he “ignored the Geneva conventions” and showed pics of Abu Grabby (sp? lol)….huh? Made it sound like he ordered the silly antics of those prison guards.

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM

Earlier in the day, they showed a White House Tour special with the Bushes. I really enjoyed that particular episode because it was sort of a behind the scenes tour….and the Bushes were very gracious and friendly.

atlgal on January 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM

If there’s anybody who needs waterboarding, it’s Amanpour. I wouldn’t doubt she knows the whereabouts of numerous AQ and other terrorists.

Then again, I’d perform the service for just the fun of it.

TXUS on January 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Slightly OT, but has anyone seen the History Channel’s presentation called “Presidents”…I watched Bush/Clinton/GWBush last night.
They flat out Lied when they got to GWBush. It was quite troubling.
They said he “ignored the Geneva conventions” and showed pics of Abu Grabby (sp? lol)….huh? Made it sound like he ordered the silly antics of those prison guards.

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM

There is some great stuff on the history channel, as long as the subject is too old and secular to be related to politics. But, man, once they touch anything that might remotely be connected to the boogiemen the socialists hate so much, it goes totally off the rails.
Their fixation with the end of the world is just weird.

Count to 10 on January 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM

I just love it when the “educated class” gets an education

PatriotRider on January 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Further, the detaineees we’ve already got want to 1)stay in GITMO, and 2)be waterboarded. Zubadya said that we should waterboard all of his brothers. Why? Because they can’t prove their valour by sitting in a prison cell. But resisting torture, then confessing how much important stuff you know, gives them a chance to prove their bravery and importance to the cause.

hawksruleva on January 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM

If we would elect a real Prez, tis would not be a problem.

We lose a plane. They lose a city.

They would soon get the point.

IlikedAUH2O on January 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM

When I listen to someone like Philippe Sands it brings it home to me just how stupid and cowardly my country has become. I cannot help but feel acute anger towards limp wisted tools like him that are naive to the point of acute insanity and what hurts is that almost all the people in power and who are about to come into power are just like him.

TrueBrit on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Move back to Tehran Christiane.

“I want us spending our tax dollars on buying weapons to kill the terrorists, not on lawyers defending them.

– U.S. Senator Scott Brown (R-MA)

That’s more like it.

fogw on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

She is not a reporter, she is an activist.

OldEnglish on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

There is some great stuff on the history channel, as long as the subject is too old and secular to be related to politics. But, man, once they touch anything that might remotely be connected to the boogiemen the socialists hate so much, it goes totally off the rails.
Their fixation with the end of the world is just weird.

Count to 10 on January 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Somoene needs to start an American channel. John Wayne movies, documentaries about the Founding Fathers, Westerns, and military history shows.

hawksruleva on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

the look ohe Amanpour’s face is too perfect. There’s a new screenshot waiting to happen.

booter on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

What do Christiane Amanpour and Phillipe Sands do when they are not sniffing their fingers…?

Seven Percent Solution on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Video: Theissen rips Amanpour on false reporting

I was hoping this meant Tiffani Thiessen. Oh well.

CP on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Man, that is some serious pwnage. Sure to enrage the Left just like John Yoo’s command performance on Jon Stewart’s show last week.

rockmom on January 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM

If we would elect a real Prez, tis would not be a problem.

We lose a plane. They lose a city.

They would soon get the point.

IlikedAUH2O on January 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM

Or run out of cities and villages. Either way works.

hawksruleva on January 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM

Somoene needs to start an American channel. John Wayne movies, documentaries about the Founding Fathers, Westerns, and military history shows.

hawksruleva on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

That is a wonderful idea. Send it to Roger Ailes!

rockmom on January 21, 2010 at 10:33 AM

I am not familiar with the CNN crew. Only know a little about Christiane Amanpour from Laura Ingraham and others, and what little I do know makes me loathe her.

OmahaConservative on January 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM

What do Christiane Amanpour and Phillipe Sands do when they are not sniffing their fingers…?

Seven Percent Solution on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

This is your second post in 24 hours about sniffing fingers…

Should I be concerned?

katy on January 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM

Somoene needs to start an American channel. John Wayne movies, documentaries about the Founding Fathers, Westerns, and military history shows.

hawksruleva on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

NOooooo, I’d get nothing done! :)

OldEnglish on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

It’s always fun, in a 2 against 1 fight, to see the 1 win.
.
But tis strange that this is in fact 2 against 1. Shouldn’t it be 1 against 1 with a referee?
.
And they say Fox News is unbalanced.

MaxMBJ on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

Slightly OT, but has anyone seen the History Channel’s presentation called “Presidents”…I watched Bush/Clinton/GWBush last night.
They flat out Lied when they got to GWBush. It was quite troubling.
They said he “ignored the Geneva conventions” and showed pics of Abu Grabby (sp? lol)….huh? Made it sound like he ordered the silly antics of those prison guards.

I went 3 years without cable and just picked it up again in Summer 2009. Apparently, in that time, History Channel has ditched actual history in favor of leftist revisionism and popular conspiracy theories. They now feature far more specials on the end of the world and the possibilities of alien involvement in Biblical phenomena than they do on, say, major wars. It’s pathetic and I’m thoroughly disappointed in them.

Animator Girl on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

I see two recruiting tools in this video, Christianne Amanpour and Phillipe Sands. No one brings more comfort and confidence to the terrorists than those who are defending them.

fourdeucer on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

the look ohe Amanpour’s face is too perfect. There’s a new screenshot waiting to happen.

booter on January 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

You mean where she looks like someone lit her face on fire and beat the flames out with a shovel?

Oh, wait. She looks like that all the time.

CurtZHP on January 21, 2010 at 10:37 AM

Hey, this is CNN, remember? Let’s look at their tarnished history.

1. They falsely accused the US of dropping nerve gas on civilians in Laos.

2. Ignored and refused to report Saddam Hussein’s atrocities against his own people for a decade, solely to keep their Baghdad office open.

3. Had their CEO resign in disgrace after falsely accusing US troops of murdering journalists in Iraq.

4. Had one of their anchors describe the people of New Orleans as “so poor…and so black”.

5. And in prime time showed terrorist-supplied video showing the snipers’-eye view of their targets-American soldiers-just before pulling the trigger.

Yeah, these people all heart the US. Goebbels would be proud of them.

Del Dolemonte on January 21, 2010 at 10:37 AM

I’ve said this before and it bears repeating:

Any interrogation method that lippy hippies and dopey undergrads decide to endure willingly to make lame political points is not torture.

Now pulling out fingernails, lopping off digits, appendages, genitalia, now THAT’S torture, m’friend.

Waterboarding? Not so much.

radioboyatl on January 21, 2010 at 10:38 AM

And people wonder why the majority of cable news viewers watch Fox.

WyoMike on January 21, 2010 at 10:39 AM

He should have changed his strategy.

Instead of attempting to push the waterboarding/barrell issue, he should have jumped to Aman’s refusal to let him finish his statements and set the record straight.

“Toture” is not the issue, the issue should have been the criminally biased reporting of Aman.

Thune on January 21, 2010 at 10:40 AM

Phillipe Sands – Whether it happens this January or next January, what we do know is the closing of Guantanamo is a certainty.

Has the man met Obama or picked up a newspaper lately?

fogw on January 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM

I loved this. I figured it would degenerate into a screaming match but Theissen handled himself very well. You could tell he felt nothing but complete contempt for the people he was talking to. I don’t blame him.

Masterful attempt to set the record straight IMO.

-He pointed out that the US has only waterboarded 3 people.
-We do it to our own troops for training.
-He highlighted the lies and smears of the media and the left.
-He didn’t concede the premise of “if you think it’s not torture why don’t you submit to it like so many other brave leftists have done??” he said “because I’m not a terrorist”.
-He pointed out that our troops deserve protections under the geneva conventions and terrorists do not, another favorite premise of the left.
-He listed several plots that were underway which were only stopped because we waterboarded 3 people and also explained how Obama is crippling our ability to gather intel from captured terrorists.

Mord on January 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM

Earlier in the day, they showed a White House Tour special with the Bushes. I really enjoyed that particular episode because it was sort of a behind the scenes tour….and the Bushes were very gracious and friendly.

atlgal on January 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM

Same with the one about Inside Air Force One. That was well done. I was waiting for them to try and get a ‘dig’ in at GW….they did not. I was shocked.

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM

alien involvement in Biblical phenomena than they do on, say, major wars. It’s pathetic and I’m thoroughly disappointed in them.

Animator Girl on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

Yes, I agree. Some of their shows are awful….to think people watch this stuff and this is their only reference…yikes.

bridgetown on January 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM

Amanpuor is mad only because she’s got family in GITMO, and there ain’t no visiting hours.

BobMbx on January 21, 2010 at 10:43 AM

Great job by Marc. He definitely went in prepared for CNN’s version of balanced reporting.

Southernblogger on January 21, 2010 at 10:45 AM

liberals always welcome death. they are insane.

moonbatkiller on January 21, 2010 at 10:45 AM

History Channel jumped the shark years ago – but the ad nauseum Pawn Stars being shown everyday, combined with “Life After Humans” 10 times a day… I miss a good ole War of 1812 piece or Ghengis Khans’ life story… you know, actual HISTORY.

Odie1941 on January 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM

Christiane Amanpour is a stupid runt.

TheSitRep on January 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM

Sorry, I misspelled that, I meant to type “reporter”.

TheSitRep on January 21, 2010 at 10:50 AM

This thread reminds me of Peter Arnett, for some reason.

OldEnglish on January 21, 2010 at 10:50 AM

So she is a deciever. She is a tramp stamp for the Muslims?

Isn’t it great these web sites expose her trash?

seven on January 21, 2010 at 10:50 AM

Amanpour spills the beans when she make the comment about the “debate” and implicitly admits she is debating. Does she not portray herself as an objective journalist?

InterestedObserver on January 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM

What is with that women pointing her glasses at everything?

Sorax on January 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM

‘i actually talked to the CIA’

zing!

well worth the watch…

cmsinaz on January 21, 2010 at 10:55 AM

Amanpour is Americas senior Muslim apologist. Mr. Sands was the very image of abject dhimmitude. These are indeed the times that try mens souls.

Has America got a Muslim Police Association yet? They are being quite helpful in Britain.

BL@KBIRD on January 21, 2010 at 10:56 AM

Why can’t we accept the wisdom and truth as expressed by the intellectually superior among us?/heavily laced with sarcasm. Amanpour is obviously brilliant–much like Odamna. Why won’t we just listen?

Crusader Rabbit on January 21, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Amanpour is a muslim.

royzer on January 21, 2010 at 11:02 AM

A thought to consider; Just as Obama intends to close Gitmo, any sane President can order it reopened – the rest of the world can kiss the sunny side of my arse. “To Protect and Defend”! Obama is doing NEITHER!

GoldenEagle4444 on January 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM

The man from London was an idiot. Why does he expect supporters of waterboarding to just jump at the chance to have it done to them? We waterboard because it’s uncomfortable and unpleasant – that’s the point. Nobody claims it to be a relaxing experience. I personally would like to have it done to me, though. :-)

Narutoboy on January 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM

She’s an appalling clown and apologist for the radical left and a whole panoply of anti-American terrorists.

Jaibones on January 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM

trs on January 21, 2010 at 10:26 AM

AMEN

barnone on January 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM

I watched this video yesterday and clapped with glee! Marc tells Amanpour “you’re one of the people spreading misinformation” !!!

Pour yourself a cup of coffee and watch the video. How sweet it is!!!

TN Mom on January 21, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Video: Theissen rips Amanpour on false reporting

More like:
Amanpour tears Theissen a new one!

Is HA becoming the conservative version of NYT?

Norman Blizter on January 21, 2010 at 11:07 AM

There is some great stuff on the history channel, as long as the subject is too old and secular to be related to politics. But, man, once they touch anything that might remotely be connected to the boogiemen the socialists hate so much, it goes totally off the rails.
Their fixation with the end of the world is just weird.

Count to 10 on January 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM
HC had something on last week about White Sharks on the coasts.
White Sharks!…on the History Channel!
If they’d stick to sharks and military history HC would be fine…but of course they won’t

annoyinglittletwerp on January 21, 2010 at 11:08 AM

Up to seeing this clip I’ve thought of Amanpour as just “meh… probably left of center but more or less a decent journalist”. But when she did that condescending “EXCUUUUSE ME?” I wanted to knock her out. And talking about obfuscation… for chrisssake… she called the Khmer Rouge water torture and the CIA’s waterboarding the same thing, and then she and her guest shouted down this guy with tangents, platitudes, and general talk-overs. That was quite unbelievable.

After watching this clip, CNN and Amanpour have moved leftwards on my map of left-right networks.

AlexB on January 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM

Test

Dire Straits on January 21, 2010 at 11:14 AM

t’s always fun, in a 2 against 1 fight, to see the 1 win.

But tis strange that this is in fact 2 against 1. Shouldn’t it be 1 against 1 with a referee?

And they say Fox News is unbalanced.

MaxMBJ on January 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM

..I agree with your sentiment but don’t agree that Mark won. If he had won, the two nutless assh*les — one bereft of stones by accident of birth — would have been silenced/convinced or otherwise struck dumb by his logic. Instead, they blathered on about how they were devoutly inculcated with an undying love for free speech or how an upside down hot tub session is like lying on a bench with a wet washrag on one’s face.

Also, not to be disputatious, but Fox regularly lines up two conservatives against one liberal in the Hannity Great-Great-Great-Great-Great American Panel segment.

But all three of the participants there are reasonable, logical and can conduct a civilized debate (most of the time). Here you have two bloviating, raving loons.

By the way, is it just me or is Christian AnalPour’s voice annoying enough to make one contemplate suicide?

VoyskaPVO on January 21, 2010 at 11:14 AM

I find it comical how a tart eating elitist, separated from DC by thousands of miles, an ocean, and a top secret security clearance dusts off Thiessen’s accounts as trivial and fictional.

As a speechwriter, as is the case in any administration, Thiessen is likely privy to more top secret information than most in the chain of command since it his job to shape communication and administration friendly interpretation of such knowledge from the first-person perspective of the Commander in Chief (not standard daily talking points like the Press Secretary) to the public if tasked to do so.

selias on January 21, 2010 at 11:16 AM

No doubt it goes without saying to any reasonable human being, but being submerged in a barrel of water is not a “simulation” of drowning, designed to dupe the nervous system into triggering anti-drowning reflexes. It is actual drowning.

Blacklake on January 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM

Amanpour and Sands are both treacherous windowlickers.

Dino64 on January 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM

History Channel jumped the shark years ago – but the ad nauseum Pawn Stars being shown everyday, combined with “Life After Humans” 10 times a day… I miss a good ole War of 1812 piece or Ghengis Khans’ life story… you know, actual HISTORY.

Odie1941 on January 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM

That Pawn Stars show is crap. Just an effort to jump on the reality show “oooh, what an interesting job I have” bandwagon. It’s gotten ridiculous. I keep waiting for a new show where they follow some janitor around an office building just to see how they manage to find drama in it.

CurtZHP on January 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM

Great debate. Why doesn’t the left just say that they don’t care if lives were saved, they just don’t like the idea of Waternoarding, even though they aren’t entirely sure what it is?

And what thell is with Amanpour’s accent? It sounds fake. It has always sounded fake. Is it fake? As fake as her reporting?

Daemonocracy on January 21, 2010 at 11:25 AM

Just a continuation of the ‘media elite’ knowing everything. Despite the fact that most of the time they couldn’t find their own asses with a map, compass and written directions.

GarandFan on January 21, 2010 at 11:26 AM

I NEVER watch Amanpour. She is the biggest anti-America reporter in the world. She is an instigator who only cares that America looks bad.

SHE is the one that started the war in Kosovo when she implored Clinton to ‘save them from genocide’. It wasn’t genocide, it was a civil war. She took the side of the Muslims (who were torturing and attacking the Christians soliciting the response that she covered).

Amanpour is the WORST correspondent and I NEVER listen to her. I haven’t listened to her ON PURPOSE since she talked Clinton into getting us involved in the civil war in kosovo that was none of our business.

That she gets paid to trash America is a shame.

ThackerAgency on January 21, 2010 at 11:26 AM

recruiting tools. Riiiiiight.

Because there were no Islamic extremists before we interred a few of them at Guantanamo.

The only tools waterboarding recruits are leftists.

TexasDan on January 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM

It is actual drowning.

Blacklake on January 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM

oh, nice righty spin mr. nuance.

/s

TexasDan on January 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM

That sure was something.

She looked so arrogant, so condescending. She didn’t say “I consider that torture,” or “some consider that torture,” she said “that’s torture.” What happened to journalistic integrity? to not brining your own opinions to the table?

She sounded exactly like what people accuse Fox News of being, but she claims to be a “reporter,” not a commenter.

That was pitiful.

29Victor on January 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM

Test

Dire Straits on January 21, 2010 at 11:14 AM

B+

29Victor on January 21, 2010 at 11:37 AM

It would be great if Ms Amanpour is put on the “watch” list and is perpetually searched, interrogated and thoroughly screened every time she tries to fly.

Maybe she’ll get a better idea how us regular schlubs have to live today because of radical muslim mass-murderers.

wildweasel on January 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM

Amanpour HAS to know she falsely portrayed OUR waterboarding, and yet, she admits nothing and continues on the attack. Sickening.

Danzo on January 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM

After watching this clip, CNN and Amanpour have moved leftwards on my map of left-right networks.

AlexB on January 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM

Not moved, she lives there. Amanpour’s Troubling Journalism.

batterup on January 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Video: Theissen rips Amanpour on false reporting

More like:
Amanpour tears Theissen a new one!

Is HA becoming the conservative version of NYT?

Norman Blizter on January 21, 2010 at 11:07 AM

So, which of these attacks would you prefer we hadn’t stopped?

gwelf on January 21, 2010 at 11:47 AM

What John McCain suffered at the hands of his captors in Vietnam was torture.

Insults, intimidation and discomfort are NOT forms of torture. What else doesn’t constitute torture? Hurt feelings (you’ve dropped my Koran!) ar being interrogated by a female (one not wearing a burka no less).

It’s simply unfathomable how naive Amanpour and Sands are about the darkness in some mens souls. Thiessen’s “which one” question was right on the mark, and the other two were so caught up in their message that they didn’t realize their ox had just been gored.

Let’s get Michael Yon a camera crew and support staff like Amanpour. Then we can have a voice of experience report how it really is.

hoakie on January 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Amanpour’s accent = nails on chalkboard

long_cat on January 21, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Great Job Marc Thiessen!

unlisted on January 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM

Not moved, she lives there. Amanpour’s Troubling Journalism.

batterup on January 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM

And yet Fox News is constantly accused by the left as being partisan. What an absolute joke.

I think that it exposes one of the main differences between us and them. I realize that I’m a partisan. I realize that my opinions are just that, opinions. They don’t. They think that their opinions are just “clear thinking.”

It’s this attitude that compels Chris Matthews to call those who don’t support ObamaCare as “fringe” when over half the country doesn’t support ObamaCare.

29Victor on January 21, 2010 at 11:59 AM

For those that can’t use youtube there is a copy on Amapour’s blog on CNN site.

Dire Straits on January 21, 2010 at 12:00 PM

If he doesn’t believe that waterboarding is torture, why doesn’t he submit himself to that technique? My God, that is the stupidest question I’ve ever heard. I don’t believe that being imprisoned or publicly held up to ridicule in a reality show is torture, but it doesn’t mean that I’d subject myself to either. As to Amanpour, she is beyond ridiculous. She spouts agitprop as if it were news, and then calls opinions that don’t coincide with her own “provocative.”

morganfrost on January 21, 2010 at 12:04 PM

When Sands says that the troops subjected to waterboarding know that they can ask for it stop, he reveals himself.

The three men who deserved and got the technique couldn’t ask for that, Sands reveals himself sympathetic to their feelings.

A scary place, his mind must be.

thebrokenrattle on January 21, 2010 at 12:04 PM

The liberals have moved the goal posts so far in defining “torture” that our ability to get important intel has become a running joke with the terrorist:


‘Bring my lawyer! — That’s what’s so beautiful about America.

 [Andy McCarthy]
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDVjYmJhYWU3OWQ2MWUxNzU3M2M1OTczZTIxYTE3Zjg=

Choosing America as an enemy was not, however, without its advantages.  Amir Abdelgani advised his confederates that, if arrested, “Nobody talk until seeing his lawyer.”


 

“You understand,” Siddig echoed.  “Tell them, ‘I don’t know.  I’m not talking to you.  Bring my lawyer.’  Never talk to them.  Not a word. ‘My lawyer’—that’s it!  That’s what’s so beautiful about America.”

But so many liberals like Christine allow ideology to trump reality.

Where we used to get very important intel from captured terrorist that would prevent further attacks,we now get lawyers and laughter from the terrorist:


What the Criminal-Justice Model Gets Us

Jennifer Rubin – 12.30.2009 – 10:08 AM

Buried deep in the Washington Post account of the Obama administration’s  intelligence failures regarding the Christmas Day terror attack is this nugget:


Abdulmutallab remains in a Detroit area prison and, after initial debriefings by the FBI, has restricted his cooperation since securing a defense attorney, according to federal officials.

Great…thanks liberals…….more 9/10 thinking please.

Now one of the chief Intelligence officials admits how stupid this is:


Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair told senators today that it was a mistake for authorities to give the accused bomber in the attempted Christmas Day attack on a U.S.-bound airliner a reading of his Miranda right to an attorney without consulting Blair’s office, the Homeland Security secretary and other officials.

“That unit was created exactly for this purpose,” Blair told the Senate Homeland Security Committee. “We did not invoke the HIG in this case. We should have. Frankly, we were thinking more of overseas people. And, duh  … the decision was made on the scene.”

But don’t worry because even when the “Greatest Administration Evaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!” does get intel….
…..they don’t do a dam# thing with it but “blame Bush”:


NYT: Obama administration missed more terror warning signs than acknowledged in report

posted at 12:55 pm on January 18, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/18/nyt-obama-administration-missed-more-terror-warning-signs-than-acknowledged-in-report/

In early November, American intelligence authorities say they learned from a communications intercept of Qaeda followers in Yemen that a man named “Umar Farouk” — the first two names of the jetliner suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab — had volunteered for a coming operation.

In late December, more intercepts of Qaeda operatives in Yemen, who had previously focused their attacks in the region, mentioned the date of Dec. 25, and suggested that they were “looking for ways to get somebody out” or “for ways to move people to the West,” one senior administration official said.

“We carry prayer beads, and with them we carry a bomb for the enemies of God,” a man describing himself as a Qaeda fighter from Yemen announced in a video released on Al Jazeera satellite television. “The issue is between us and America and its allies, and beware, those who stand in the ranks of America.”

Remember….UN officials had already notified intelligence officials that this “underwear” type of explosive was being used and Yemen has been a top Al-qeada training area for years.

Add to this the fact we had been bombing them recently and you would think somebody would be paying close attention to the activity there.

….So the same people who think the August PDB which contained “old and unspecific evidence” concerning Bin Laden striking America pretty much get a detailed road map of a terrorist attack and drop the ball.

…But this is the type of incompetence we get when the people who think that pouring water over the face of terrorist or putting caterpillars in their cells to gain important intel is “evil” and “barbaric”.

…..Maybe if Obama’s anger and focus on his enemies did not concentrate on Americans like Rush,Palin,and the Tea Party coalition this type of incompetence could have been avoided.

……But I guess we should give Obama a break….we know how important improving his golfing handicap is.

Baxter Greene on January 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM

It’s a bit like talking about Clinton’s penis decades later. LOL*

AnninCA on January 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM

During his first term in office, Clinton had his Justice Department successfully prosecute a female Federal employee (VA) for lying under oath about sex.

She wasn’t above the law. He was.

Del Dolemonte on January 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Video: Theissen rips Amanpour on false reporting

More like:

Amanpour tears Theissen a new one!

Norman Blizter on January 21, 2010 at 11:07 AM

Hi, Wolf!

Del Dolemonte on January 21, 2010 at 12:33 PM

Forget the first half. Amanpour pontificates, cuts off Thiessen and allows the snarky Leftist professor to blather forever. Completely unfair alotments of time allowed each. Thiessen does his sharp best to shred their arguments in the second half, but is still interrupted, deliberately misinterpreted and drowned out for the most part.

Amanpour is a laughable amateur with absolutely no interest in logic and without any capacity for objective inquiry. She’s a big-mouth engine of agenda. Thiessen should have directly labeled her unserious. The clown from England was out of leftist cental casting. A serious, well-moderated debate is impossible in this format, and I wish Thiessen had said so.

I have yet to see a real smackdown of these people.

rrpjr on January 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM

Comment pages: 1 2