David Brooks: If Brown wins and the Dems pass ObamaCare anyway, they don’t deserve to govern; Update: Bayh warns of “catastrophe”

posted at 6:14 pm on January 19, 2010 by Allahpundit

The perfect complement to the DeMint post in showing how thoroughly Massachusetts has scrambled American politics. Not only do we have principled conservatives embracing moderates, we’ve got one of America’s chief apologists for the “educated class” warning Dems that they deserve to burn if they decide to ignore the will of the hoi polloi for their own good.

The country is now split on Obama, because he is temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic, but his policies are almost all unpopular. If you aggregate the last seven polls on health care reform, 41 percent support it and 51 percent oppose.

Many Democrats, as always, are caught in their insular liberal information loop. They think the polls are bad simply because the economy is bad. They tell each other health care is unpopular because the people aren’t sophisticated enough to understand it. Some believe they can still pass health care even if their candidate, Martha Coakley, loses the Senate race in Massachusetts on Tuesday.

That, of course, would be political suicide. It would be the act of a party so arrogant, elitist and contemptuous of popular wisdom that it would not deserve to govern. Marie Antoinette would applaud, but voters would rage.

Said one Democrat to the Daily Caller earlier today, “If Brown wins, we can’t yet see all of the ramifications — the party switches, the retirements. I lack sufficient creativity to envision how bad this is going to be for us.” Dude, if David Brooks is accusing you of elitism for continuing to pursue this, it should be abundantly clear how bad it’s going to be. Dick Durbin may be putting on a brave face, but Lieberman’s already started talking up what a devastating message about ObamaCare has been sent in Scott Brown being so close in Massachusetts. How are they going to use ping pong to ram the Senate bill through the House if senators like Lieberman, Nelson, et al. start making populist noise a la Brooks about the process being illegitimate or possibly even switching their votes if they had a chance? Especially when Pelosi’s starting with a margin that’s even thinner than it was last time?

Here’s audio of Barney Frank explaining what a constitutional nightmare it is that Democrats haven’t yet been able to pass this fantastically unpopular bill. Exit quotation, emphasis mine: “Despite talk about how the White House wants to ram the measure through, resolve among terrified Democrats will likely crack if not crumble, even if Coakley somehow manages to pull out a win.”

Update: Let the Blue Dog stampede begin.

“There’s going to be a tendency on the part of our people to be in denial about all this,” Bayh told ABC News, but “if you lose Massachusetts and that’s not a wake-up call, there’s no hope of waking up.”…

“The only we are able to govern successfully in this country is by liberals and progressives making common cause with independents and moderates,” Bayh said. “Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country — that’s not going to work too well.”

Someone needs to ask him and Lieberman point blank: If you were voting for ObamaCare for the first time tomorrow, what would your vote be?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

David Brooks? DAVID BROOKS???!!!???!!!!!!!!!!!

OmahaConservative on January 19, 2010 at 6:17 PM

We knew it was you Fredo Brooks. You broke our hearts.

portlandon on January 19, 2010 at 6:17 PM

That is one ugly sumbitch…

catmman on January 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM

That’s one video I won’t be a-clickin’ on.

fiatboomer on January 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM

But Dave, you’re criticizing the party of the sharp pants creases!

Cicero43 on January 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM

Awaiting comment from David Frum, Kathleen Parker, and Peggy Noonan. Not.

Terrie on January 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM

David Brooks = 24 hour clock

Even when broken is right once a day.

singlemalt_18 on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

The country is now split on Obama, because he is temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic,

He just refuses to acknowledge anything approaching reality. This is pure insanity.

neurosculptor on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

No sh!t Sherlock. Oh, thank for the heads up about the scary close up of Barney. Scared the crude out of me. I don’t suppose it’s a mug shot?

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

Do it Obama! You’ll inherit a congress so hostile that you will be lucky to serve a full term.

Mord on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

Brooks needs a diaper.

upinak on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

Brooks: “I always secretly abhorred President Barack Hussein Obama…let me back in.”

Bishop on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

“Educated class”

Weight of Glory on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

Brooks needs a diaper.

upinak on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

I think he eats diapers.

neurosculptor on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

I don’t suppose it’s a mug shot?

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

we can dream Cindy. Still haven’t recieved the package. :(

upinak on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

The White House needs to get a photo of Obama’s creased pants to Brooks STAT!

Kensington on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

Our Miss Brooks can’t write an article without incorporating lavender-scented prose about his love-object, Osama Obama.

If he approaches truth in this piece — and I won’t click to find out, considering where the link goes — it is irreparably damaged by a willful inability to see that the Chicago Jesus is the Number One source of potential national destruction among Brooksie’s mincing, simpering political elite.

MrScribbler on January 19, 2010 at 6:22 PM

It would be the act of a party so arrogant, elitist and contemptuous of popular wisdom that it would not deserve to govern. Marie Antoinette would applaud, but voters would rage.

Brooks? Wow. Just WOW. And rage we will. That’s how they passed the stimulus no one wanted. Majority of Americans disapproved, democrats passed it. People are fed up.

scalleywag on January 19, 2010 at 6:22 PM

Obama’s flute isn’t keeping the rats following him anymore.

The rats are jumping ship every day, hoping for survival.

But, drowning is still drowning.

viviliberoomuori on January 19, 2010 at 6:22 PM

“The country is now split on Obama, because he is temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic, but his policies are almost all unpopular.”

You forgot cle@n, @rticul@te, l!ght-sk!nned, with the ability to speak “wh!te,” not to mention the cre@se in his p@nts.

(Don’t know which of those words triggered the new insane monster censor.)

notropis on January 19, 2010 at 6:23 PM

I still say Brooks is unfairly labeled an elitist…of course, he’s made a comment or two that sure sound elitist, but for the most part he’s just using journo basics.

JetBoy on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

because he is temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic,

wha’chu talkin’ about willis?

cmsinaz on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

I don’t know why you give this guy the Ink

KBird on January 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Brooks is just looking out for himself.

The next thing we’ll hear from him is that Bambi is wearing a cheap suit.

Cody1991 on January 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM

upinak on January 19, 2010 at 6:20 PM

You will be happy when you do. Don’t forget that yesterday was a Federal holiday.

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM

We knew it was you Fredo Brooks. You broke our hearts.

portlandon on January 19, 2010 at 6:17 PM

Time to take him for a happy boat ride in a bottomless lake.

Geochelone on January 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Wow, what can you say about people that are referred to as “elitist” by David Brooks?

thirteen28 on January 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Nice creepy shot of Bawney.
How would like to see that face on your first day as a Cub Scout.

jjshaka on January 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Is that picture of Barney his mug shot?

Knucklehead on January 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM

heh

blatantblue on January 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM

The next thing we’ll hear from him is that Bambi is wearing a cheap suit.

Cody1991 on January 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM

But the crease is so sharp.

OmahaConservative on January 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM

Oh, thank for the heads up about the scary close up of Barney. Scared the crude out of me. I don’t suppose it’s a mug shot?

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

I believe it is, Cindy….taken when he got arrested for trying to bend over Pages in the Library of Congress. :|

Patrick S on January 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM

he’s made a comment or two that sure sound elitist

he’s made a comment or two or 10 or a few hundred that sure sound elitist

Purple Avenger on January 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM

JetBoy on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Maybe because he has written a fair number of articles about anti-elitism and how it hurts the country.

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM

It would be the act of a party so arrogant, elitist and contemptuous of popular wisdom that it would not deserve to govern.

Brooks needs a neck collar for his intellectual whiplash from contradicting himself.

Ted Torgerson on January 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM

In many ways, Barack Obama has lived up to his promise. He has created a thoughtful, pragmatic administration marked by a culture of honest and vigorous debate. When Obama makes a decision, you can be sure that he has heard and accounted for every opposing argument. If he senses an important viewpoint is not represented at a meeting, he will stop the proceedings and demand that it gets included.

If the evidence leads him in directions he finds uncomfortable, he will still follow the evidence. He is beholden to no ideological camp, and there is no group in his political base that he has not angered at some point in his first year.

That from the article above. Clearly Brooks is still delusional with a Chris Matthews tingle still running up his leg.

patrick neid on January 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM

“Brooks”…

…a word that has become synonymous with “always behind the curve”.

Saltysam on January 19, 2010 at 6:29 PM

I still say Brooks is unfairly labeled an elitist…of course, he’s made a comment or two that sure sound elitist, but for the most part he’s just using journo basics.

JetBoy on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

because he is temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic,
wha’chu talkin’ about willis?

cmsinaz on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Come on JB, Bury is none of these things as a precedent.

thomasaur on January 19, 2010 at 6:30 PM

Knucklehead on January 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM

Great minds, see my 6:19 comment.

Running home to watch the results, “see” you in a bit.

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:30 PM

If you were voting for ObamaCare for the first time tomorrow, what would your vote be?

that would be a negative, no way no how, nope, naye, nyet…

cmsinaz on January 19, 2010 at 6:30 PM

Frank and Weiner are dicks.

RobCon on January 19, 2010 at 6:30 PM

I wish the NYT would hurry up on implementing their subscription model. They’re losing money hand over fist!

:)

Dusty on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

neurosculptor on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

Yeah, he is still smoking his banana peels.

chemman on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Someone needs to ask him and Lieberman point blank: If you were voting for ObamaCare for the first time tomorrow, what would your vote be?

They would never answer publicly AP, but trust me, they’d vote for it again in a heartbeat.

Knucklehead on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Political suicide.
David Brooks cut himself with a sharp crease already.

HornetSting on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Dude, if David Brooks is accusing you of elitism for continuing to pursue this, it should be abundantly clear how bad it’s going to be.

DUH !!!

jerrytbg on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Gotta love Barney

RobCon on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

But Dave, you’re criticizing the party of the sharp pants creases!

Cicero43 on January 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM

Sharp pants on the ground creases DAWG!

alohapundit on January 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM

Brooks is about as interesting as Noonan and Parker. They just admire different things about BO. Brooks likes Bambi’s suits, and the two women seem to have other interests. In the end they are all confused and pathetic.

Cody1991 on January 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM

brooks, lets crack a budweiser and celebrate the defeat of them edumucated types.
If bud is too fancy Knickerbocker will do.

rob verdi on January 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM

No sh!t Sherlock. Oh, thank for the heads up about the scary close up of Barney. Scared the crude crud out of me. I don’t suppose it’s a mug shot?

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM

..or his photo fem the eHarmony dating site.

VoyskaPVO on January 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM

I wonder if Brooks realizes just how 20th Century he is…

ignatzk on January 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM

..crud! fem==from.

VoyskaPVO on January 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM

Bayh is running scared. He even voted against the Omnibus bill, but that won’t save him unless he bails on Healthcare.

txmomof6 on January 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM

Evan Bayh has drank from the cup of the unholy grail, and he sees the darkness.

Sweet!

singlemalt_18 on January 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM

You will be happy when you do. Don’t forget that yesterday was a Federal holiday.

Cindy Munford on January 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM

I know… just looking forward to it.

upinak on January 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM

So maybe not all dems will follow Obama off the cliff??

Oil Can on January 19, 2010 at 6:34 PM

I dislike Bayh ever so slightly less for something that.

(Still don’t like him much, though.)

Track-A-'Crat on January 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM

Brooks to conservative base: I’m with you on this one.

Conservative base: No. No. That’s not true. That’s impossible!

Brooks: Yes, and Obama’s pant crease still makes me horny.

Conservative base: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

MadisonConservative on January 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM

JetBoy on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

The problem is what passes for Journo Basics. You know the need to interpret the results for us uneducated rubes living between the coasts.

chemman on January 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM

In other news…….

Pelosi was spotted wearing a panama shirt and big black sunglasses stirring some sort of large black cauldron. She was overheard saying “we need some more kool-aid….. and cups, don’t forget the cups.”

Spider79 on January 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM

“For something that”?

D’oh.

“for saying something like that.”

Track-A-'Crat on January 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM

So maybe not all dems will follow Obama off the cliff precipice??

Oil Can on January 19, 2010 at 6:34 PM

FIFY

Geochelone on January 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM

Brooks: Yes, and Obama’s pant crease still makes me horny.

Conservative base: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

MadisonConservative on January 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM

LOL. Why is Brooks always so infatuated with Obama from the waist down?

portlandon on January 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM

Brooks is a RINO wretch, one of Obamas whoredogs in the media.

Tomorrow he’ll be worrying about the Caliph’s pants again and casting stones at the Conservatives. Waiting for another call from his employers at the White House.

Brooks is part of the Cocktail GOP cancer in the party, Tonight the party starts chemotherapy!!

PappyD61 on January 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM

“Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country — that’s not going to work too well.”

Gee, Evan, ya’ think?

OmahaConservative on January 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM

Brooks can’t hold his mud around real conservatives.

fossten on January 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM

Yeah, he is still smoking his banana peels.

chemman on January 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Heh. Headache-city, but that’s about Brooks’ speed.

neurosculptor on January 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM

Nice creepy shot of Bawney.
How would like to see that face on your first day as a Cub Scout.

jjshaka on January 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Funny. Very funny.

Lou Budvis on January 19, 2010 at 6:38 PM

Is Nancy Pelosi worried about Democrats in the House taking away her seat as head of the House of Reps?
And what about Harry Reid?

Maybe the Democrats think perhaps they need some new faces in leadership positions?

If Obamacare fades away watch Harry Reid announce he is not running for re-election.

albill on January 19, 2010 at 6:39 PM

I still say Brooks is unfairly labeled an elitist…of course, he’s made a comment or two that sure sound elitist, but for the most part he’s just using journo basics.

JetBoy on January 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Meh, he’s an elitist as far as I’m concerned.

scalleywag on January 19, 2010 at 6:39 PM

In that article Brooks also calls Obama a “fine administrator.”

Ahem. I beg to differ. Most profoundly.

Edouard on January 19, 2010 at 6:39 PM

Maybe someone will ask Bayh why this hadn’t dawned on him after over a million people (who are not given to public demonstrations) showed up on Capitol Hill on 9/12 … and then the Dems just pushed on with the roundly-hated, un-American, un-Constitutional plans of theirs to have the federal government do anything it wanted, even to the unbelievable point of arguing that the federal government had the power to identify any market that it felt was not served “well enough” and to open up a company owned by the federal government and just jump in.

I can’t stand these slimeballs.

neurosculptor on January 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM

Viva’ le Tea Party!!! Viva le Revolution!!!

AP, you better have some extra batteries ready for the Humpbot.

PappaMac on January 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM

Our Miss Brooks.

Sorry, that’s an insult to Eve Arden.

Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM

Barney Frank…

One of the authors of our economic collapse, walking around spouting this tripe.

Nice.

Seven Percent Solution on January 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM

Why do you give any facetime to a liberal who’s purported to be one of us?
I got mad at Rush today for giving that pig Grayson one second of time on his show.

Lanceman on January 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM

We tried to tell the lefties. Every step of the way, they were warned. We knew the true heart of the country wasn’t behind them. They refused to listen, because they don’t do that – at least, not to anyone that’s not one of them.
We gave them every chance. Time’s up.

n0doz on January 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM

Mr. Brooks needs to acknowledge that he was wrong about Obama. Because if he’s going to call the Congressional Democrats insular and arrogant and elitist and comtemptuous, then he’s really going to have to find more suitably intense words for Obama. Mr. Brooks, dude! Obama is the LEADER of the Democrats!!

ConScribe on January 19, 2010 at 6:42 PM

Maybe Brooks is having an epiphany, and he finally understands what it means to be despised.

Welcome to our world, Brooksie. You deserve it along with your pals who think you are not only entitled (ordained) to make decisions for the rest of us, but you are also allowed to spit on us daily.

There is a huge backlash growing out here. Palin is just the beginning.

Cody1991 on January 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM

“Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country — that’s not going to work too well.”

.
I’m going to need a minute…

ronsfi on January 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM

A Democratic Crisis is a terrible thing to waste. Viva Le Tea Party!!

PappaMac on January 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM

Instead of moving the chairs around on the top deck of the Titanic the rats are jumping off the ship now. If Brown can pull this out it will be big.

Brat4life on January 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM

Since when did David Brooks care what ‘the commoners’ want. Can it be that he’s seeing pitchforks / tar & feathers in his future?

It would be the act of a party so arrogant, elitist and contemptuous of popular wisdom that it would not deserve to govern.

Like what they’ve been doing since January 2009, David?

“Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country — that’s not going to work too well.”

No shit! And just what have you done about it Byah? Not a damned think except vote the party ticket. Smell the roses pal! You and your party are TOAST. And you can tell Carville (aka The Skull) that his “40 years of Progressive Reign” just came to a screeching halt.

GarandFan on January 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM

Is Bayh really so dense he’s only now realizing what I’ve known for months? It has been patently obvious for months that they were steering the country and their party into an ice berg, yet they’ve shown extreme hubris and ignored all warnings.

flyfisher on January 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM

Someone needs to ask him and Lieberman point blank: If you were voting for ObamaCare for the first time tomorrow, what would your vote be?

Does it really even matter if they say the right things now? They knew how most Americans felt months ago, and still were intimately involved in keeping the Obamacare process moving.

They’ve already demonstrated their blindness and deafness to the will of the people. It’s only now that they are getting a taste of how bad things will be for their political careers that they’ve begun worry about the angry folks breathing down their necks.

They shouldn’t be trusted. Actually, all those like them should have to go.

red winger on January 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM

Nice creepy shot of Bawney.

How would like to see that face on your first day as a Cub Scout.

jjshaka on January 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Bawney is definitely a creepy guy. I encountered him last July at the Lowell MA Folk Festival, where he was sitting with a female friend (his sister maybe?) at one of the stages. Never smiled once. Or clapped for any of the music.

And he was wearing Bermuda Shorts. That would give anyone bad dreams.

Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM

When I read Brooks’ commentary I nothing but poorly self-serving deception; barely a word is more than back-handed praise of a citizenry he disrespects.

I remember him saying well before Obama’s election that he was sober and thoughful and would be a mosderate centrist who wouldn’t screw up.

I believe later he got a good feeling from some quality of his pant creases.

Over and over he calls Obama conthoughtful and pragmatic: In fact as Obama does it, thoughtful is a eupemism for cagey and pragmatic a eupemism for manipulative.

But the country is not ‘now split’ on Obama: It was split on election day; it is now against him.

Twice(?) he refers to the public being wrong in their decision making, yet he never says that they are ever right; he only says with the highest praise that they have a profound sense of balance and wisdom, presumably however when they are at the same time wrong in their other desires about how the governement should govern.

Brooks declaims elitism while fundamentally supporting it. His only gripe really is that the Dems have so obviously exposed this elitism of which Brooks is a drooling adherent.

flicker on January 19, 2010 at 6:46 PM

“The only we are able to govern successfully in this country is by liberals and progressives making common cause with independents and moderates,” Bayh said. “Whenever you have just the furthest left elements of the Dem party attempting to impose their will on the rest of the country — that’s not going to work too well.”

STFU Bayh. You made your bed. You chose to ignore us Hoosiers as we begged and pleaded for you not to vote for this drek and YOU DID ANYWAY.

And you have the GALL to sit there and tell us now its time to work together for a common cause?!?

No. Say buh-bye to your nice cushy government job.

Skywise on January 19, 2010 at 6:47 PM

Sorry: I hit submit before I was done.

flicker on January 19, 2010 at 6:47 PM

“temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic”… give me a Fuck$n break! The a$$shole is a communist. He was raised a communist. He went to a communist church for 20 years. He supports the communist Black Panthers. He supports the communist Muslims. And, that makes him “temperate, thoughtful and pragmatic”? He is a total disaster and needs to be totally disgraced and ostracized from American society.

Dale on January 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM

The fact that this is taking place in Massachusetts, the state where the first tea party occurred, is just so incredible and symbolic.
We need to remember, the GOP ignored Brown in the beginning! This proves our party leaders are not at the front of this effort to take back congress! They don’t have the vision! They don’t have the fire!

JellyToast on January 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM

Brooks must have looked past Brown’s truck and to see the crispness of the crease in Scott’s pants…..or could it be some other crisp characteristic of Scott that appeals to Mr. Brooks?

notagool on January 19, 2010 at 6:51 PM

Being a hoosier I know all too well the response Bayh would give, undecided. I have stronger words but being a lady, I’ll leave it as he’s a wuss.

froginthesky on January 19, 2010 at 6:52 PM

I got to step out and get another case of popcorn. Something tells me this is going to be days of laughing.

The big winner here is the tea party people. I bet joiners double the tea party people’s numbers by Friday.

tarpon on January 19, 2010 at 6:53 PM

Brooks must have looked past Brown’s truck and to see the crispness of the crease in Scott’s pants…..or could it be some other crisp characteristic of Scott that appeals to Mr. Brooks?

notagool on January 19, 2010 at 6:51 PM

When Bawney stops freaking out he will probably develop a girlish crush on Brown. He’s damned good looking. Scottie McHottie!!

Cody1991 on January 19, 2010 at 6:54 PM

They’ve only lost half of Massachusetts. The other half is still firmly in their camp — for now.

unclesmrgol on January 19, 2010 at 6:55 PM

Comment pages: 1 2