Good news: Obama to take “combative” approach to Brown victory

posted at 8:57 pm on January 18, 2010 by Allahpundit

A follow-up to last week’s video clip of The One promising to make the midterms a referendum on ObamaCare, which is working like gangbusters right now for Marcia or Marla or whatever her name is. Not sure if there’s actual strategy at work here or if it’s just their “do the opposite of what Clinton did” instincts at work. Clinton didn’t pass health care and got wiped out in the midterms, ergo we must pass health care regardless of how many people hate it. Clinton tacked towards the center after he was repudiated by voters, ergo…

President Barack Obama plans a combative response if, as White House aides fear, Democrats lose Tuesday’s special Senate election in Massachusetts, close advisers say.

“This is not a moment that causes the president or anybody who works for him to express any doubt,” a senior administration official said. “It more reinforces the conviction to fight hard.”…

There won’t be any grand proclamation that “the era of Big Government is over” — the words President Bill Clinton uttered after Republicans won the Congress in the 1990s and he was forced to trim a once-ambitious agenda.

“The response will not be to do incremental things and try to salvage a few seats in the fall,” a presidential adviser said. “The best political route also happens to be the boldest rhetorical route, which is to go out and fight and let the chips fall where they may. We can say, ‘At least we fought for these things, and the Republicans said no.’”

Translation: If your head hurts from trying to deal with ObamaCare, wait until they get around to cap-and-trade and amnesty.

My favorite part? Obama’s the underdog against Scott Brown or something:

But the president’s advisers plan to spin [Brown's win] as a validation of the underdog arguments that fueled Obama’s insurgent candidacy.

“The painstaking campaign for change over two years in 2007 and 2008 has become a painstaking effort in the White House, too,” the official said. “The old habits of Washington aren’t going away easy.”

Imagine the contempt you’d have to have for voters’ intelligence to spin a Republican win — in Massachusetts — as some sort of business-as-usual victory for entrenched interests. Hey, champ? In case you haven’t heard, Republicans don’t win in New England anymore. Or at least, they didn’t until you launched Project Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste. This victory belongs to you as much as it does to Scotty B; take credit for it.

That’s all I can reasonably quote from Politico’s piece. Follow the link for more on how they’re planning to blame Coakley (justifiably) and wage class warfare on Wall Street, because if there’s one thing Tim Geithner’s Treasury Department can’t stand, it’s giant investment banks. For your viewing pleasure, via Greg Hengler, here’s D.C. rep Eleanor Holmes Norton reminding Massachusetts voters that Obama and the Democrats really don’t care what they think.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM

Love it!

lukespapa on January 18, 2010 at 9:51 PM

What happened to Obama’s pledge to unite and unify the country? As with all of Obama’s promises—this has an EXPIRATION DATE. That was fast too.

conservative pilgrim on January 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Like muslims and jihad, there was only to be peace and unity if we surrendered to Obama. He was never prepared to embrace or even tolerate any ideas that oppose his own.

wildcat84 on January 18, 2010 at 9:52 PM

What happened to Obama’s pledge to unite and unify the country? As with all of Obama’s promises—this has an EXPIRATION DATE. That was fast too.

conservative pilgrim on January 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM

I disagree, he has done what he promised, just not what he exactly wanted. He is uniting the country against him and this criminal Democratic congress!

bluemarlin on January 18, 2010 at 9:53 PM

Seriously have you seen the price of arugula at Whole Foods recently?

jukin on January 18, 2010 at 9:53 PM

O/T: Some ‘baseball guy’ on Hannity right now wearing a “Brown” shirt…
Good stuff!

Seven Percent Solution on January 18, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Yeah, those crazy Yankee fans.

TXUS on January 18, 2010 at 9:53 PM

What happened to Obama’s pledge to unite and unify the country? As with all of Obama’s promises—this has an EXPIRATION DATE. That was fast too.

conservative pilgrim on January 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM

The country will be united once his political enemies are out of the way. He didn’t lie, mind you. It’s simply that we here are ‘obstructionist’.

Now, please stop confusing what he said with what he meant. /sarc

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

Game over dudes………….Bob Beckel just convinced me Brown takes it all tomorrow.

I’ve never seen him like this before.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

SEND SCOTT $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$%$ FOR LEGAL CHALLENGES

OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

On top, I can’t imagine local police doing Obowmao’s bidding against the People, let alone the military.

Obowmao is talking tough. Big deal! He’s posturing, and only to his base. As for the rest of us common folk, he’s driving us further away.

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 9:45 PM

There is a big difference between the police and the military.

I agree, a LOT of police officers, perhaps even a majority, would do as you suggest.

However, the police are used to conflicts with civilians, and engaging (and even killing) civilians. The military isn’t. (and are in fact sworn against it) There would be a significant number of police who would “follow orders” to engage the “criminal” opponents of the president’s new order.

wildcat84 on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

Game over dudes………….Bob Beckel just convinced me Brown takes it all tomorrow.

I’ve never seen him like this before.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

He is still farting and harrumphing.

OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 9:55 PM

another talking head just said Brown was going to win tomorrow. Can you hear the coffin closing?

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:57 PM

But the president’s advisers plan to spin [Brown's win] as a validation of the underdog arguments that fueled Obama’s insurgent candidacy.

Fe-fe, fi-fi, fo-fo, fum
I smell smoke in the White House auditorium
Obama Brown, Obama Brown
He’s a clown, that Obama Brown
He’s gonna get caught
Just you wait and see
(Why’s Massachusetts pickin’ on me?)

That’s him yet again dithering on his knees
I know that’s him
Yeah, from 7 come 11
Down in the Saudi King’s gym
Obama Brown, Obama Brown
He’s a clown, that Obama Brown
With his mom jeans down, he’s gonna get caught
Just you wait and see
(Why’s Massachusetts pickin’ on me?)

Who’s always dithering on employment’s fall
Who’s always goofing in the hospital hall
Who’s always at the economy throwing a spit ball
Guess who (who, me?) yeah, you!
Who walks in the White House auditorium, cool and slow
Who treats the Founding Fathers’ Constitution like Trash-O
Obama Brown, Obama Brown
He’s a clown, that Obama Brown
With his mom jeans down, he’s gonna get caught
Just you wait and see
(Why’s Massachusetts pickin’ on me?)

MB4 on January 18, 2010 at 9:58 PM

Notice that, on 9/11, no one mocked when Bush said he’d take a combative approach toward AQ.

When Barry says he’ll be combative, we’re so busy laughing he almost stands chance of winning, for that reason alone.

What a buttnut this country elected to the presidency!

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 9:58 PM

Bob Beckel just said “baggers and birthers” as in teabaggers…Bob Beckel just effing jumped the shark…Holy teabags batman

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:58 PM

Seriously have you seen the price of arugula at Whole Foods recently?

jukin on January 18, 2010 at 9:53 PM

I hate arugula as much as Soccer, but I know a garden that has the former, growing weakly, on Pennsylvania Ave.

TXUS on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

did you guys see that? Beckel just insulted senior citizens and maintained the teabagger meme

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Based on Barry’s “accomplishments”, he should be able to do the State of the Union during a commercial break.

No network pre-emption required.

David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Beckel is a bloated malignant gasbag. He never has anything to say of any value.

LarryG on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Is it me, or is Barry one Brown victory away from rocketing himself into the deep-freeze of space along with his cat Bigglesworth?

CaptFlood on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Is a combative stance anything like a wide stance when dropping a deuce in an airport?

Alden Pyle on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

I think Obama honestly will be relieved to lose in 2012. He’s WAY out of his depth and knows it.

It’s not incompetence, it’s strategy! They’re in pure power grab mode and it will only get uglier. That’s what they’re announcing here. A Republican resurgence could reenergize his base. As long as Obama’s approval rating is between 40 and 50 percent they still have a lot of room for manoeuvre. The more they control, the easier it will become for them to hold on to power.

Also remember Alinsky rules like “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside”. By 2012 the Republicans could have become too smug for their own good. Conservatives will start to play up their social agenda again. The economy may have become a little less bad. Obama could be the underdog and comeback kid.

modifiedcontent on January 18, 2010 at 10:00 PM

AP—Beckel is effing digging hard at the end of Hannity’s show tonight. What a schlepping drunk fat putz.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:00 PM

did you guys see that? Beckel just insulted senior citizens and maintained the teabagger meme

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Saw it.

Now excuse me while I go and pick up my jaw from the floor.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 10:00 PM

Is a combative stance anything like a wide stance when dropping a deuce in an airport?

Alden Pyle on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Only if you take off your AQ supplied PETN panties….

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM

AP—Beckel is effing digging hard at the end of Hannity’s show tonight. What a schlepping drunk fat putz.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:00 PM

I can’t stand that crusty ginger.

bloggless on January 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM

transitioning from the Im not Bush to the Im not Clinton

this will solidify the mod Dem, Indy, Conservative, GOP coalition that has been building

full steam ahead eh lemmings?

nothing pixxes the people off like being Ignored Dan!

ginaswo on January 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM

Game over dudes………….Bob Beckel just convinced me Brown takes it all tomorrow.

I’ve never seen him like this before.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

Yep!

Beckel looked like Jimmy Swaggert confessing to hookers and cocaine.

David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM

Bob Beckel just absolutely insulted, then maintained an idiotic and unsubstantiated position on TEA Partiers.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM

Game over dudes………….Bob Beckel just convinced me Brown takes it all tomorrow.

I’ve never seen him like this before.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

That is a Beckel I can like to watch.

bluemarlin on January 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM

I love this:

At the rally for Coakley, he added: “Bankers don’t need another vote in the United States Senate. They’ve got plenty.”

Apparently that is true even with a 60-vote Democratic majority now, seeing as how the Senate Banking Committee just announced last week that the House financial reform bill is DOA there. Democrats in the Senate seem to be carrying the banks’ water quite nicely these days.

Who do these people think they are talking to? My 12-year-old wouldn’t believe this BS.

rockmom on January 18, 2010 at 10:03 PM

1 if by ACORN, 2 if by SEIU

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM

+1 ~ Very nice!

ReagansRight on January 18, 2010 at 10:03 PM

isnt Beckel a senior citizen?

bloggless on January 18, 2010 at 10:04 PM

wildcat84 on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

Most cops I know, including State Police, are right of even you and me. The Dems might impose some kind of ‘new’ regime, but they’ll have a hard time keeping it; conquest is easy but control is not.

And if it comes to brass tacks, with the Army on the side of the People, there’s nothing in private hands to match an M1A2 tank. Plus 250 million guns in private hands. Obowmao might have his civilian force, but they’ll be outmatched on every level.

Hopefully it’ll never come to that.

This ‘combative’ approach is all talk, street-thuggish and juvenile. I dare him and all his lib friends to back it up. When every Dem Congresscritter takes up a gun and steps outside the Capitol building ready for true combat will I take this Affirmative Action joker somewhat seriously.

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 10:04 PM

Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.
He said to his friend, “If the British march
By land or sea from the town to-night,
Hang a lantern aloft in the belfry arch
Of the North Church tower as a signal light,–
One if by land, and two if by sea;
And I on the opposite shore will be,
Ready to ride and spread the alarm
Through every Middlesex village and farm,
For the country folk to be up and to arm.”

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:05 PM

Don’t get complacent, MA. Put Scott Brown over the top, and do it big time to send a message to “champ,” the guy in the silk shorts, sucking on shaved ice.

onlineanalyst on January 18, 2010 at 10:05 PM

You can always count on the rookie Obama to go all-in with a losing hand. Independents can’t stand him, and he wants to be combative? It won’t work or win back anyone with buyers remorse.

BottomLine5 on January 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM

Then he said “Good-night!” and with muffled oar
Silently rowed to the Charlestown shore,
Just as the moon rose over the bay,
Where swinging wide at her moorings lay
The Somerset, British man-of-war;
A phantom ship, with each mast and spar
Across the moon like a prison bar,
And a huge black hulk, that was magnified
By its own reflection in the tide.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM

Watching the local news and saw Coakley get dissed by a patron at the Erie pub in Dorchester — classic! And (for you local Boston Boys,) news babe Maria Stephanos is wearing those black boots tonight, so tune in ;-)

CaptFlood on January 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM

Meanwhile, his friend through alley and street
Wanders and watches, with eager ears,
Till in the silence around him he hears
The muster of men at the barrack door,
The sound of arms, and the tramp of feet,
And the measured tread of the grenadiers,
Marching down to their boats on the shore.

Then he climbed the tower of the Old North Church,
By the wooden stairs, with stealthy tread,
To the belfry chamber overhead,
And startled the pigeons from their perch
On the sombre rafters, that round him made
Masses and moving shapes of shade,–
By the trembling ladder, steep and tall,
To the highest window in the wall,
Where he paused to listen and look down
A moment on the roofs of the town
And the moonlight flowing over all.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM

1 if by ACORN, 2 if by SEIU
ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM

My apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson:

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood,
And fired the shot Scott heard round the world.

Juno77 on January 18, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Bring it Bambi!

Holger on January 18, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Show us how you pivot and we’ll show you how we steal your ball and dunk on ya!

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:10 PM

Folks on our side, if Brown wins, Obama will double down in the sense of taking the war against our side to a higher level. We must be prepared to fight back and take no prisoners and not think this is politics as usual and advocate for “can’t we get along” bipartisanship as RINO’s are wont to do.

technopeasant on January 18, 2010 at 10:11 PM

ACORN and SEIU… PUBLIC ENEMIES 1 and 2.

ronnyraygun on January 18, 2010 at 10:11 PM

On the job feigning.

The amateur has learned nothing.

fogw on January 18, 2010 at 10:12 PM

This one is for you Prez, you pos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8kLmU0DUUc&feature=rec-r2-2r-1-HM

nwpammy on January 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM

“The old habits of Washington aren’t going away easy.”

Like elections?

El_Terrible on January 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM

“…along with his cat Bigglesworth?

CaptFlood on January 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM”

Pinky Bigglesworth…!

Oh, wait!

Seven Percent Solution on January 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM

technopeasant on January 18, 2010 at 10:11 PM

+100

No quarter asked and none given.

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM

This one is for you Prez, you pos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8kLmU0DUUc&feature=rec-r2-2r-1-HM

nwpammy on January 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM

That’s raaaacist. Had to say it.

El_Terrible on January 18, 2010 at 10:14 PM

technopeasant on January 18, 2010 at 10:11 PM

Trench Warfare.

Holger on January 18, 2010 at 10:16 PM

For your viewing pleasure, via Greg Hengler, here’s D.C. rep Eleanor Holmes Norton reminding Massachusetts voters that Obama and the Democrats really don’t care what they think.

Translation: Take a fall for our crappy bill and like it, or take a fall the Weekly Standard way….

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:17 PM

No trenches here folks. This is unconventional.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:17 PM

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:17 PM

Guerrilla warfare, a la Che Guevara.

Wouldn’t that be poetic justice?

Liam on January 18, 2010 at 10:19 PM

We are so far inside this guy’s melon he doesn’t know whether to spit or wind his watch.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:35 PM
True, true.

He even admitted to reading blog posts the other day.

David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Probably only the ones that stroke him…but that is after he reads the ten (carefully selected by flunkies) letters that have been sent to the WH. BTW How is Henrietta doing?

onlineanalyst on January 18, 2010 at 10:20 PM

The snake gets more dangerous as each day passes.

mobydutch on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 PM

I disagree, he has done what he promised, just not what he exactly wanted. He is uniting the country against him and this criminal Democratic congress!

bluemarlin on January 18, 2010 at 9:53 PM

Yes! The irony is lost of Teh One. He has tunnel vision.

Liam–

I will now fall in line and do what I’m told by The Emperor in Chief. / ;-)

conservative pilgrim on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 PM

Hey, MA voters, keep a sharp eye out for Ed Schultz. He has promised to vote ten times at each precinct for Coakley.

onlineanalyst on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 PM

Scott Brown’s Birthday: 9/12

LibTired on January 18, 2010 at 10:25 PM

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:17 PM

trench warfare as in dirty, bloody, grueling and barbaric.

Holger on January 18, 2010 at 10:25 PM

“It more reinforces the conviction to fight hard.”

Don’t worry, we’ll PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD, champ.

fossten on January 18, 2010 at 10:26 PM

I had to laugh when I saw this…they have no idea what’s headed their way.

Not if…but when Brown wins…if they try and ram this through there better be a million man march on DC! If they try and ram this we better all pack up the cars and go march people…do you hear me?!?!

TheAudacityofNOPE on January 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM

The community organizer shtick doesn’t work so well when you’re president. You can’t fight the machine when you are the machine; the only target left is the community.

obladioblada on January 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM

Hey, MA voters, keep a sharp eye out for Ed Schultz. He has promised to vote ten times at each precinct for Coakley.

onlineanalyst on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 PM

He retracted that statement today and changed it to 100 times or something like that. I heard the audio on BOR.

Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM

Holger on January 18, 2010 at 10:25 PM

we’re smarter than that now. Case in point, Hannah Giles.

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM

Campaigner in Chief doing the only thing he knows how to do, the ONLY thing his puppetmasters can use him to do. More Chavez-like DAILY speech appearances on our TVs.

rayra on January 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM

How did the history get revised to read that the Democrats lost in 1994 due to Clinton’s inability to pass health care reform?

THAT IS NOT TRUE!

The Democrats lost because they started get into everyone’s business. Republicans like to get into your bedroom – but that’s where it stops for them. Dems are into every other aspect of your life.

The predominant nail in the coffin for the Dems was the gun control legislation they were passing. There is a reason that even LIBERAL democrats don’t want to tackle gun control – and that’s because they remember what happened the last time they did. They pissed off an electorate who voted them out.

I remember Clinton saying … “Many Democrats lost their seat last night no doubt due to the votes they cast on gun control”.

Now … they are pissing off Americans with other issues. Not gun control – but issues nonetheless which anger Americans – who ARE going to vote them out in November.

HondaV65 on January 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM

A fine post, Sir Allah.

NebCon on January 18, 2010 at 10:30 PM

How do people elect dumbasses that actually will say something so stupid as this ass? When the people read the 2000+ bill they will understand??? Thank you so much for telling me how I will feel once it’s passed and you tell me what is in it? I have no idea how anyone can call themselves democrats with the pelosi, reid, and this nut case as leaders. Seriously.

momof2 on January 18, 2010 at 10:31 PM

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM

Hanna Giles is a good start. What she did was smart and something we need to build upon. We need deep moles in the opposition apparatus who can expose the real sleaze of the Left, who can sabotage their efforts and give us information on what they are doing.

Holger on January 18, 2010 at 10:33 PM

Obama is at a concert tonight at the Kennedy Center while Haitians continue to starve a week after the earthquake.

Where’s Geraldo, Shep Smith, and the other bleeding-heart mouthpieces crying on tv and angrily demanding help?

Hey Dem’s, not so easy dealing with a disaster is it?

David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 10:36 PM

“The best political route also happens to be the boldest rhetorical route, which is to go out and fight and let the chips fall where they may. We can say, ‘At least we fought for these things, and the Republicans said no.’”

Hey genius…wake up!!!!

It’s not just the “Republicans” that are saying no,it is America.

That is why you are going to lose the bluest seat in the Senate in one of the bluest states in the union.

…If it was just Republicans saying “no” this Senate seat would be safe…..

…….What an absolute moron!!!!

Baxter Greene on January 18, 2010 at 10:40 PM

SEND $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ TO SCOTT, PLEASE.

OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 10:45 PM

AP – Obama’s not reacting to what Clinton did. He’s following W’s lead. W didn’t change course until the ’06 mid-terms so Obama won’t tack right until after ’10. As W would say it, Obama has “capital to spend”. Fine by me.

budfox on January 18, 2010 at 10:49 PM

wildcat84 on January 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM

In the big cities yes the police would go against the citizenry but not in rural areas where they would be confronting friends and relatives.

chemman on January 18, 2010 at 10:49 PM

So he’s basically telling the citizens of this country, whether you voted for him, or not. Whether you support him, or not….he’s going to work for the greater good of illegals, than those that were born here, work here, pay taxes here, pay his salary…give him great trips, and pay for all his wants, and needs?

I’m holding up a finger to you Obama, and it doesn’t signify that you’re number one!

capejasmine on January 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM

go out and fight and let the chips fall where they may.

They are taking the long view. They are getting the camel’s nose under the tent, the Harkin starter home. They aim to take 10 years or so but they will control our lives.

If we don’t stop them. Now.

PattyJ on January 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM

..atta boy, Barry, flex those glistening man-boobs, you effeminate, lisping, metro-sexual wuss.

VoyskaPVO on January 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM

Pants on the ground, pants on the ground; lookin’ like a fool with your pants on the ground.

Philly on January 18, 2010 at 10:54 PM

The inverse of the First Rule of Holes:

The First Rule of A-Holes

29Victor on January 18, 2010 at 10:54 PM

I just saw the pants on the ground guy on Greta. I hope that guy makes millions. And the tune is catchy.

Philly on January 18, 2010 at 10:57 PM

As W would say it, Obama has “capital to spend”. Fine by me.

budfox on January 18, 2010 at 10:49 PM

Bush didn’t say that until after he was re-elected in 2004. It’s a different deal when you get walloped in your first midterm election. Clinton is the better comparison.

Missy on January 18, 2010 at 11:01 PM

I am continually AMAZED by the ignorance, incompetence and utter stupidity of bama. He may be “president” of the U.S. but he is NOT and NEVER will be my president!!! Each day proves what a total lying and out-of-touch POS he is! Citizens be damned; he’ll get his worthless health care bill if it kills him? Here’s hoping; take a flying fark, doofus!!!

jgdp on January 18, 2010 at 11:04 PM

Somewhere, Mary Jo Kopechne is smiling ear-to-ear, while Joe Kennedy, Sr., twists in his grave. The people’s seat in Massachusetts is going back to the people.

Goldy1 on January 18, 2010 at 11:13 PM

I wonder what approach Obama will take to losing one or both of the houses? Ultra combative?

Are we really going to get a narcissistic hissy fit meltdown?

This is going to be epic.

jhffmn on January 18, 2010 at 11:34 PM

Mr. Obama,
It looks as though Scott Brown will win this election. If so we Tea Party “types” have a message for you…
Bring it!
The buck stops with you, not Bush or Cheney. We know what you are really about now.
Thank you for helping thousands of us to appreciate the Constitution that you so blatantly disregard.
The honeymoon is over,

Dr Bob on January 18, 2010 at 11:47 PM

I can’t believe he’d be this stupid.

He should be driving towards the Center, a la Nixon!

victor82 on January 19, 2010 at 12:02 AM

Can you imagine what the Obama library is going to look like?

Mojave Mark on January 19, 2010 at 12:12 AM

If we bring a knife, President Obama will bring a gun. If several million of us bring knives, President Obama will bring a slightly larger gun.

I’m gonna have to start buying popcorn by the bushel.

29Victor on January 19, 2010 at 12:13 AM

Can you imagine what the Obama library is going to look like?

Mojave Mark on January 19, 2010 at 12:12 AM

Going by his instincts to harm our country
Heres a wild guess

macncheez on January 19, 2010 at 12:26 AM

Good news: Obama to take “combative” approach to Brown victory

Good – maybe he’ll be sure to tell the world that Massachusetts voters acted “stupidly”.

RD on January 19, 2010 at 12:37 AM

I expect this, which is why he will be a lame duck before his first year is complete.

Vashta.Nerada on January 19, 2010 at 12:48 AM

Bob Beckel just said “baggers and birthers” as in teabaggers…Bob Beckel just effing jumped the shark…Holy teabags batman

ted c on January 18, 2010 at 9:58 PM

Bob can barely get out of his chair – doubtful any jumping was happening with him!

poppieseeds on January 19, 2010 at 12:49 AM

Can someone put up a graphic of The Zero bowing to a HC defeat please?

poppieseeds on January 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4