Golf claps for Coakley at Martin Luther King breakfast in Boston
posted at 10:12 am on January 18, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
If Martha Coakley could depend on one friendly audience in the final hours of her campaign to replace Ted Kennedy in the Senate, one would expect that to be the Martin Luther King Breakfast in Boston. The event rarely has the political profile it does this year, thanks to the timing of the special election, but it attracts Democratic power brokers from the Bay State’s bastion of Democratic politics. Ben Smith reports on the much-less-than-enthusiastic response Coakley received:
Martha Coakley spoke to the Boston Martin Luther King Day Breakfast this morning, making the case to a subdued crowd of dignitaries at the Hynes convention center that voting for her tomorrow will help carry on King’s legacy. …
“If you end me to the Senate, I will be guided by those values,” she said of President Obama and King to a packed ballroom that included her opponent, Scott Brown, who sat in the crowd; Coakley sat on the dais.
Coakley received polite, seated applause, but her tepid reception at a stronghold of Democratic politics reflected the lack of excitement among Democrats for the race. Brown was also received warmly, shaking hands and taking pictures with well-wishers during pauses in the morning’s event.
It looks as if everyone wanted to shake hands and greet the next Senator from Massachusetts — and in their estimation, that was the one candidate who didn’t speak from the dais. Maybe they agreed with Scott Brown, who blasted Coakley for her arrogance in turning the MLK celebration into a campaign rally by asking for votes:
Scott Brown blasted his rival Martha Coakely for invoking the legacy of Martin Luther King in asking for votes at the Boston Martin Luther King Day breakfast this morning.
“I thought it was inappropriate when she started asking for people’s votes when they’re trying to remember Martin Luther King, Jr.,” he said. “I didn’t know this was a rally for Martha.”
Desperation will do that to a candidate, apparently. The bigger takeaway was that Coakley felt the need to ask them for their votes, at an event that attracts the leadership of Democratic politics in a heavily Democratic city. In ordinary circumstances, Coakley wouldn’t even need to be there.
And in ordinary circumstances, the Democrat would be getting the backslaps while the Republican got the golf claps.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
PLEASE SEND $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ TO SCOTT
OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Delicious. More, please.
OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM
A Freudian slip on the part of the transcriber? Yes, we will end her race to the Senate!
DocKen on January 18, 2010 at 10:16 AM
She should go home and prepare her concession speech and call it a day.
sherry on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
This is simply delectable
blatantblue on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Forget it. Guns and Lawyers!
newton on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
I’m sure Marcia has things well under control. She’ll be sitting in the Kennedy Senate seat in no time!
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Isn’t Scott Brown’s truck a Gov’t Motor’s truck? Is that why Obama was insulting it?
uknowmorethanme on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Since when have the Democrats not considered everything a political rally. Church service and funerals aren’t safe from these people why would a breakfast for MLK be?
jarodea on January 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Yes, because the purveyance of black genocide through unfettered abortions plays really well at a MLK rally.
SouthernGent on January 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Someone should ask Coakley about the multiple coordinated attacks in Kabul this morning.
Seeing as the Taliban are no longer there, who the hell was it? Frat Kid Gone Wild?
EnglishMike on January 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
I love the smell of desperation in the morning.
TXUS on January 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
love it!!
brown has more tact in his little pinky than coakley will ever have…
cmsinaz on January 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Brown is refreshing. Unlike 90% of the GOP, when his opponent fumbles, he’s right there to pounce on the ball and move it for his team. From the “Kennedy seat” to this, and all of the Fenway/Schilling stuff, he certainly seems to be hitting all the right buttons.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM
“One day I hope to have my four kids judged not by their skin color, but the content of their character.”
– MLK
Now which party creates laws based on skin color?
WashJeff on January 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM
It’s almost as if Democrats don’t really like her. It was just her time to step up to the plate and everyone is watching her swing and miss….swing and miss.
Mord on January 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM
how tepid
blatantblue on January 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM
Judging by her campaign ads, she’d blame the people in the Twin Towers. Or maybe say the Red Sox were responsible for the attacks.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Why do you think MLK Jr. was a Republican?
uknowmorethanme on January 18, 2010 at 10:21 AM
I think you can change your message to volunteer for Scott, now. We need people to go door to door and phonebank.
Enoxo on January 18, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Brown’s campaign manager should and ought to be in HIGH demand by other pols. Regardless os outcome, Brown’s campaign was on the ball BIG time.
WashJeff on January 18, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Hope we can scare up someone like him to oppse Judas Nelson here in 2012, but I’m betting I could even defeat Nelson at this point.
OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 10:22 AM
heh This is awesome!
becki51758 on January 18, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Not Martin Luther King’s party. Of course, MLK’s party was the GOP.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Patches Kennedy was also on hand urging voters to elect Marcia Coakley to the seat once held by his father, Todd Kennedy.
JammieWearingFool on January 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Scott Brown is Godzilla and he is snacking on the dem\’s little useless weapons. munch, munch… crunch
ray on January 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM
So, OmahaConservative, what would you say to taking over Michael Steele’s job? Seeing how you raised and sent more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to Scott than they did? Or how about Cornyn’s position (you know, Cornyn, the second biggest disappointing senator from the great State of Texas!)?
Seeing how the Repubs have sent Scott exactly $0.
Never again will I send those idiots money. Never. They no longer speak for me, nor choose my candidates.
I’ve already got a list started:
Mark Rubio
Alan West
Sue Lauden…
UnderstandingisPower on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Don’t give a rat’s rear end about party, but he sure seemed to have conservative leanings and a love of liberty based on his popular speeches.
WashJeff on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM
you never hear that little tidbit from the msm…I wonder how many folks actually know that on the (D) side
cmsinaz on January 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM
BOOM goes the dynamite!
All was not lost for the Dem’s, however.
Patrick Kennedy was outside after the event shaking hands and wishing people a happy Marcia Rufus King day.
David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 10:25 AM
Begging black voters to vote democrat on MLK day. Now I’m starting to feel sorry for Marcia. Heh, heh, heh.
Rational Thought on January 18, 2010 at 10:26 AM
I remember the golf claps (love that term, Ed) for Senator McCain until he selected Governor Palin as a running mate. The polite subdued reception of McCain demonstrated quite a bit about his listless campaign.
chaswv on January 18, 2010 at 10:28 AM
So all Democrats in MA now have become “ignorant” of MLK’s history?
1. Republican
2. Strong proponent of “individual responsibility”
3. Pro-individual industry and wealth; anti-Fed
4. Anti-abortion; considered “abortion” as plague to the Black community.
5. A devout Christian.
6. Advocate of Strong National Security (the only thing that MLK and JFK agreed on; but criticized JFK’s poor foreign policies).
and…
7. Anti-Liberal.
Will Coakley honestly stand for MLK’s values and political beliefs?
If she sincerely does, COAKLEY MUST VOTE FOR BROWN.
TheAlamos on January 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Zero? If that’s true then the national GOP can kiss my donations goodbye forever, and by forever I mean forever. The checks will now say pay to the order of “Michele Bachmann” and a handful of others, that’s it.
Bishop on January 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM
This was back when the GOP used to stand for something.
uknowmorethanme on January 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Brown’s GM truck is from pre-Government Motors days. It actually runs and has over 200,000 on it.
Maybe “Marcia” should have told them she was “no ways tired”. That would have gone over big. /sarc
kingsjester on January 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM
The Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee is spending $0 on advertising for Brown while the DSCC is spending $1.4 million.
uknowmorethanme on January 18, 2010 at 10:31 AM
on Coakley.
uknowmorethanme on January 18, 2010 at 10:31 AM
LOL
becki51758 on January 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Because he voted Republican. And because Democrats at the time were more likely to send the dogs after black people than march with them. And because King’s father and grandfather voted Republican.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM
What is a golf clap?
Buy Danish on January 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM
KEEP SENDING $$$$$$$$$$$. They will need it while certifying the results.
OmahaConservative on January 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Here’s Steele appealing for $$ to be sent to Brown (dated Jan. 7).
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/01/steele-rnc-raising-money-for-scott-brown.html
But I read something this morning that said the Senate Republican whatever (the committee in the Senate that helps put forward great candidates–the one that endorsed Crist at the outset of his run) has sent nothing to Brown. That was the end of my supporting THEM… ever again.
UnderstandingisPower on January 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM
What is a golf clap?
Buy Danish on January 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Unenthusiastic clapping to be polite.
kingsjester on January 18, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Right. That’s exactly the same thing I read.
UnderstandingisPower on January 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Golf clap.
JammieWearingFool on January 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM
I love it. Warren Zevon would be proud.
gmbdds on January 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM
My understanding is that they are sending him money under the radar, since he has preferred not to emphasize the Republican brand. I’m not sure we can know one way or another what they’ve done in this race since he seems to want to keep it on the QT (wisely imho).
Missy on January 18, 2010 at 10:37 AM
An STD transmitted by Tiger Woods’ mistresses.
RedWinged Blackbird on January 18, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Good upstanding honest people need to volunteer to work the polls tomorrow. You never know how many times Ed Schultz is gonna show up and vote.
Seriously, we need honest people working the polls.
Good luck Scott Brown. Fingers crossed and rayers sent.
milwife88 on January 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM
OMG–wonders if she has enough whiskey to last the day?
lovingmyUSA on January 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Martin Luther King, Jr. told Nixon that King voted for the Eisenhower/Nixon ticket in 1956. But of course he would. The GOP was backing civil rights legislation, and the Democrats were blocking it.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM
You separate your hands approx. 2 inches and rapidly tap the fingers of your right hand to the palm of your left hand.
It’s a quiet clap that shows appreciation, but does not disturb other golfers on adjacent golf holes.
David2.0 on January 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Thanks! I’d never heard that term before, and we’re a family of avid golf enthusiasts.
Buy Danish on January 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM
PLEASE SEND $$$$$$$$$$$$$ TO OMAHACONSERVATIVE!
TXUS on January 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM
LOL
ladyingray on January 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Tiger Woods could probaly give at least 2 answers to that question.
AubieJon on January 18, 2010 at 10:41 AM
It’s been so long since I’ve seen golf on TV that it took me a few minutes to figure out what golf clap was.
Though I give extra points for creativity to:
RedWinged Blackbird on January 18, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on January 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM
You’re getting the fundraising thing down.
thomasaur on January 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM
They have sent money and consultants–and they have been working from their offices…The kid I talked to at the RNC, last week, said he was stying untill 10pm working on the campaign. This is one time the RNC played it right–not a big physical prescence to turn off the blue state voters. Makes Brown look truly “independent”…
lovingmyUSA on January 18, 2010 at 10:43 AM
90% of Democrats everywhere are. The ones that know the truth keep it quiet, which is easy since the media has also forgotten that the Democrats spent most of the 50s and 60s trying to keep blacks down.
Robert Byrd and Al Gore know the truth. So do some of the Kennedys, whose family was busy having MLK bugged and investigated in the 60s. Jesse Jackson probably knows the truth, too, though he may have deluded himself into believing otherwise.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 10:43 AM
You owe me a new keyboard! :)
lovingmyUSA on January 18, 2010 at 10:45 AM
So Reid thinks Marcia does not have a sufficiently whitey dialect to be elected?
chaswv on January 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Coakley: MLK had a dream! And it was for me to be Senator! Vote for Marcia!
Enoxo on January 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Politico: can’t report objectively. I don’t see blasted in Brown’s reaction. Criticized? Derided? Even noted?
Instead, Politico subtly paints him as an irrational pol who has skin as thin as Obama.
BuckeyeSam on January 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM
So allDemocratsin MA now have becomeare “ignorant” ofMLK’shistory?Mojave Mark on January 18, 2010 at 10:50 AM
Tell you what, Brown is a cagy campaigner.
james23 on January 18, 2010 at 10:50 AM
A disease that Tiger Woods need to be worried about?
MarkTheGreat on January 18, 2010 at 10:51 AM
On the $$$$ to the RNC, etc. I sincerely hope that under-the-radar thing is true; HOWEVER, I have seen them jump into two races–NY23 and Florida with both feet for the WRONG candidate. I think we have as much need of resetting THAT dial as we do of resetting the Obama dial (though that one at the moment is most pressing). The good news is, I think we can do both with the right candidates. Brown, Rubio, West…
UnderstandingisPower on January 18, 2010 at 10:51 AM
Michelle has a great picture on her site of a bunch of Brown supporters holding signs and wearing… SEIU sweatshirts! God, I love this country.
TXUS on January 18, 2010 at 10:52 AM
I think Steele has said the Republican party has worked to raise money for Brown very quietly because Brown would do better without a visible connection with the RNC. I don’t know if that’s true, but it’s what is being said.
And it seems like a valid point. Brown is doing better speaking for himself than the RNC would do for him. Just give him the money and let him do what he does best. If that’s the approach of the RNC then I think it’s the right approach in this case.
justincase on January 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Coakley reeks of failure at the moment. No matter how ideologically aligned these people are with Coakley, they’ll find it hard to hide their disappointment.
ClanDerson on January 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Hey..did people at hotair fall asleep?
theres news of another dem congressman retiring.
Get on the stick boys and girls.
Handel on January 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM
I think MOST of America have forgotten (or were never taught) those fine points about MLK, Jr. He was a famous black, therefore, he must of been a democrat. People have forgotten what exactly he stood for.
cibolo on January 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM
Another black church sermon on Fox just now. The speaker asking for people to “ignore the polls” or the progressive cause will go down. I’m thinking, “polls”…is that from the Old Testament or the New Testament, cuz they wouldn’t be having a political meeting at that there tax free church, would they? Cuz that would be, you know, illegal.
Rational Thought on January 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM
By the end of the day don’t be surprised if the NYTimes and Boston Globe run with: “Scott Brown attempts to infringe on opponent’s Civil Rights of Free Speech by Brutally and Viciously attacking her for speaking at a MLK Breakfast this morning. Police could not be reached for comment.”
ronnyraygun on January 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Okay, now that was really funny…
right2bright on January 18, 2010 at 10:59 AM
BREAKING ON FOX: MARTHA COAKLEY’S HUSBAND SUPPORTS BROWN.
andy85719 on January 18, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Perhaps after the election the Dims can all pitch in and buy Marcia a front seat assembly from a ’67 Olds 88 — you know, Teddy’s seat in the Chappaquiddick incident.
GnuBreed on January 18, 2010 at 11:01 AM
Cleanup on Knuckleheads computer.
Urgent!!!!!!!
Knucklehead on January 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM
I await Steele’s MLK day statement linking MLK’s vision and values to the conservative agenda. I think I’ll be waiting for a long time.
Mr. Arrogant on January 18, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Link?
lovingmyUSA on January 18, 2010 at 11:03 AM
If Scott Brown pulls this off, the Democrats are going to have heart failure. By the way, the people MA have seen their insurance premiums soar after the state passed a similar healthcare bill a few years back.
SC.Charlie on January 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Apparently, it’s only illegal when conservative mostly-white churches bring up politics. Democrats have been using black churches for political rallies ever since they stopped aiming the dogs and firehoses at the people inside those churches.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Steele will embrace King’s heritage by not rocking the boat. Because, you know, that’s what King was all about.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM
I think she has done a fine job of ending herself.
davo on January 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM
LOL! I don’t think so. But let’s keep Martha’s husband out of this race.
TheAlamos on January 18, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Well, if she hadn’t kept calling him “Marcia Luther King Jr.,” it might have helped.
29Victor on January 18, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Well, maybe Chairman Steele has asked Sarah Palin to do exactly just like that:
http://www.facebook.com/#/notes/sarah-palin/celebrating-the-life-of-martin-luther-king-jr/253423938434
TheAlamos on January 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM
Smells like “VICTORY”.
Blacksmith8 on January 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Just heard that ABC is reporting that coakley internal polls says she is up by 2.Has anyone heard this or have in info.
thmcbb on January 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/after_obama_ral.php
At least she’s got Davy Jones’ endorsement.
Marcia! Marcia! Marcia!
miles on January 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM
It’s a sacrilege on the part of MLK, imho.
TheAlamos on January 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Now you just hold on there. Cornyn is . . . okay you’re right, but did you have to say it out loud?
I like your list. I’d add Michael Williams. He’ll be taking Kay Bailout’s former seat whether she runs or not.
Blacksmith8 on January 18, 2010 at 11:21 AM
It was a top story here on Hotair.
hawksruleva on January 18, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Ooh, her internals are telling her she is winning. Dems don’t need to show up. Stay home. This is in the bag for her.
andy85719 on January 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »