Video: “It’s the end of change as we know it” if Brown wins MA

posted at 10:45 am on January 16, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Give Mr. Hyperbole, Ed Schultz, his due here. First, he manages to stay within the bounds of reason in this clip, discussing the potential impact of a Scott Brown win over Martha Coakley in Massachusetts. He also argues, correctly, that moderate Democrats in states a lot less Democratic than the Bay State will have to rethink their position on the Obama agenda, even if Schultz laughably calls Joe Lieberman a “Blue Dog” Democrat. He only gets off base when he calls Obama’s response “angry,” when in fact “bewildered” looks more appropriate (via Mary Katharine Ham at the Weekly Standard):

The only way Schultz’ prediction fails is if the red-state Democrats like Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, Evan Bayh, and others believe the spin that Coakley’s loss is entirely her fault and not a reaction to the Obama agenda.  Even lousy candidates get elected to statewide office in the Bay State as long as they have a D next to their name, however, so don’t expect them to ignore the obvious.  If the backlash to the Pelosi-Obama agenda can take out a safe Democratic Senate seat in Massachusetts — or even come close to losing it in one of the bluest of blue states — then moderates in red states like Nebraska, Indiana, Arkansas, and others don’t stand a chance.  They’ll start looking for reasons to reassert their independence, starting with ObamaCare and continuing with cap-and-trade.  Schultz is right — it will be the end of the Obama agenda as we know it.

But what does that mean for 2010 and Democratic leadership?  Nancy Pelosi is probably safe for now, but Harry Reid may no longer be necessary.  If the Senate can’t get a health-care bill passed with 60 Democrats, it won’t get one passed with 59, either.  The reasons Reid hasn’t yet admitted defeat for his seat in Nevada, where he polls below 40% now, are (1) he has millions in his campaign warchest, and (2) he can’t push through ObamaCare as a lame-duck Majority Leader.  The Massachusetts race shows fairly clearly that millions of dollars won’t rescue a Democrat from the outrage that the Obama agenda has provoked, and Reid’s continued presence has become an albatross around the neck of his son Rory, who wants to run for governor on the damaged brand of the Reid name.  If ObamaCare runs aground, there isn’t much reason to linger to November to take his well-deserved beating at the polls.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

*Snickers* like a little girl.
HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM
FTFY.
Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 2:42 PM

Why,yes, I do snicker like a girl.
HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM

That insult only works on 50% of the population.

Juno77 on January 16, 2010 at 2:54 PM

listen up bub, those are my friends you’re talkin’ ’bout. Chill out.

ted c on January 16, 2010 at 2:49 PM

Oh, they’re quite able to defend themselves with their amazing wit and brilliant logic, at least online. And my father taught me never to strike a lady, especially a lady who might be packing heat.

But…fine. For your sake, I’ll simply refuse to acknowledge their “hurr-hurr, ah said sumthin’ funny!”-level blather.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 2:55 PM

But…fine. For your sake, I’ll simply refuse to acknowledge their “hurr-hurr, ah said sumthin’ funny!”-level blather.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 2:55 PM

You’re writing like a girl again–a girl who faints a lot, as I noted before, and a girl who never learned to Write Good.

Janos Hunyadi on January 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM

But…fine. For your sake, I’ll simply refuse to acknowledge their “hurr-hurr, ah said sumthin’ funny!”-level blather.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 2:55 PM

You write like a girl who never learned to Write Good. “dark star” = thin skin

Janos Hunyadi on January 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Hey, racefan, you’re I’m following in the footsteps of Simple Simon with immunity Did you mean impunity, DS?

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM
I want it on record that you were the first to use that term and you aimed it at me. Not that anyone will ever call you on your hypocritical behaviour… We spell behavior like this in America, DS.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 2:47 PM

‘Racefan’ was a nod to Simple Simon, who was tragically banned before I could get one more stomp in.

*Flicks BIC for our ‘favorite’ racefan, Simpleton*

Now, you need to read up on sarcasm.
Oh, and please purchase a dictionary for spelling help.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 2:59 PM

odd double post–make it a Triple

to quote the song ( my apologies to anyone who already has )

“……and I feel fine” if it’s the End of the World As We Know It.

Janos Hunyadi on January 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Janos Hunyadi on January 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Ah yes, the face of conservative elitism shows her face. Enjoy your echo chamber…I’m just going to sit back and watch you provide comedic relief.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Janos Hunyadi on January 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM
Ah yes, the face of conservative elitism shows her face. Enjoy your echo chamber…I’m just going to sit back and watch you provide comedic relief.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Your pink panties are showing, DS.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM

Dark,
If you’ve been at HA for any length of time, you should know by now not to engage in an online fight with Hornet. Her sting brings on the hurt. (And of course she’s right most of the time.)

Christian Conservative on January 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM

OT~but WHY is Hillary in Haiti~photo op, perhaps? Just use a satellite phone and allow the REAL humanitarians to do their work.
I figure they could have loaded at least fifty more gallons of clean water instead of Hill’s wide load.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Your pink panties are showing, DS.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM

Might wanna check the color balance on your long-distance X-ray vision. Oh wait, you don’t have any, you’re just throwing mud.

What is it with conservatives and spewing ignorant sexual innuendo? I thought you people were the ones clamoring for decency…or is this like liberals and their ‘tolerance’ that seems to go straight out the window at will?

To get back on topic, what exactly is the Democrat plan if Brown wins? Ply him with bribes a la Nelson?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

To get back on topic, what exactly is the Democrat plan if Brown wins? Ply him with bribes a la Nelson?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Reconciliation. Haven’t you been paying attention, DS?

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM

I figure they could have loaded at least fifty more gallons of clean water instead of Hill’s wide load.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Seriously. The doctors can’t even wash their hands between patients!

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM

To get back on topic, what exactly is the Democrat plan if Brown wins? Ply him with bribes a la Nelson?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

What’s the problem, didn’t you get your talking points from Axelrod today?

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:08 PM

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

You people? If you’re not a Liberal or Conservative, what group do you identify with?

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

I figure they could have loaded at least fifty more gallons of clean water instead of Hill’s wide load.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Seriously. The doctors can’t even wash their hands between patients!

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM

And, you KNOW she is not traveling alone~all that space, all those people needing BASICS like clean water, food, sanitation~it is sick that wide load and her entourage took up that space~are you seeing her walking around like the Queen of the Nile. Stupid. Sick. and Sad.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM

What’s the problem, didn’t you get your talking points from Axelrod today?

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:08 PM

So much for asking an honest question!

Actually, I didn’t, and Axlerod can go wheel himself over to Russia for all I care.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:12 PM

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

You people? If you’re not a Liberal or Conservative, what group do you identify with?

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

DS~answer the question or do you just come here to poke a stick at ‘us’ people?

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

And, you KNOW she is not traveling alone~all that space, all those people needing BASICS like clean water, food, sanitation~it is sick that wide load and her entourage took up that space~are you seeing her walking around like the Queen of the Nile. Stupid. Sick. and Sad.

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Yep. Disgusting display of liberal actions – “look at me, look at me!”

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

Christian Conservative on January 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM

I’m a lover, not a fighter. ;)

HornetSting on January 16, 2010 at 3:14 PM

You people? If you’re not a Liberal or Conservative, what group do you identify with?

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Trolls?

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:15 PM

More from Ed Schultz:

“If I lived in Masachusetts I’d try to vote 10 times…Yeah, that’s right. I’d cheat to keep these bastards out.”

There is your modern democrat party. One of their leading media figures can put a call out for voter fraud, and it doesn’t even make a blip on the typical democrats’ — or the democrat media’s — radar. It’s just…what they do and who they are.

Rational Thought on January 16, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Trolls?

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:15 PM


ZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM

http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Martha%20Coakley

Scroll down to the 2nd vote, be a troll and vote for Brown.

Play with their minds like they have been doing with ours.

You know what paybacks are.

Jayrae on January 16, 2010 at 3:18 PM

You people? If you’re not a Liberal or Conservative, what group do you identify with?

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM

The closest description of my position would be a mix that was some ‘Libertarian’, a bit each of ‘Conservative’ and ‘Liberal’, and some that doesn’t have an easily recognizable group to tie to.

I’m tired of the endless flame wars (online and off) and polarization that American politics has degraded to, am sick of the candidate choices, and would like government cut down to providing a basic framework for most things that tied the states together instead of taking the ‘octopus’ approach to everything.

That’s the best I can come up with on short notice, and I’ve got to catch a bus very soon. Maybe when the midterms are over I can sit down and research a better description for myself.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

comedian-guest on Red Eye last night said it – Brown has to beat the ‘margin of ACORN’.
None of these close polls win, if Democrat voter fraud efforts go unchallenged.
Brown better put some of that national contributions largesse to good use and prepare some lawyers to pounce when the inevitable shenanigans manifest themselves.
And where the hell is the RNC – where is the coordinated ground campaign to put Republican observers in EVERY polling place, to actually note and report the ballot tallies per station, so any wild divergences reported ‘officially’ can be immediately targeted for legal challenge?
Democrat voter fraud in MA WILL occur. There and in every other blue state / Soross SectState special project States. It MUST be countered specifically, not with business-as-usual ‘get out the vote’ drives and claptrap about ‘energized base’.
The GOP / RNC needs to wage a massive counter-fraud operation in November. November. 10mos from now. Instead the RNC is screwing off in Hawaii in a few weeks, just barely getting started on this most critical of campaigns. They’re at least a year behind of where they need to be, with that fool Steele doing nothing but promoting himself and fighting the infight [sic]. FIGHT THE SOCIALISTS / COMMUNISTS / MARXISTS INSTEAD, DAMMIT!

rayra on January 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM

Trolls?

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:15 PM

LOL!

DarkCurrent on January 16, 2010 at 3:22 PM

ZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM

So if I don’t identify with one of two groups, that makes me a troll. Can you say ‘prejudice’?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

Okay. College Student. That’s what I thought.

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Maybe when the midterms are over I can sit down and research a better description for myself.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

I can give you a one word description of yourself.

Troll.

And that’s my final answer. Now go catch your bus, would hate for Barry to have to throw you under it.

Knucklehead on January 16, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Please no one confuse me with Dark-Star.

DarkCurrent on January 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM

The GOP / RNC needs to wage a massive counter-fraud operation in November. November. 10mos from now. Instead the RNC is screwing off in Hawaii in a few weeks, just barely getting started on this most critical of campaigns. They’re at least a year behind of where they need to be, with that fool Steele doing nothing but promoting himself and fighting the infight [sic]. FIGHT THE SOCIALISTS / COMMUNISTS / MARXISTS INSTEAD, DAMMIT!

rayra on January 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM

I’m with ya, buddy. I’d like to see the RNC launch a very vocal, very glossy 2010/2012 FRAUD WILL NOT BE TOLERATED campaign, so everyone is watching every state and every election for signs of fraud, and screaming “We’re not gonna take it!!!” They could soften the ground now that democrat fraud will happen, so when it does a majority of voters will think, “Jeez, they were right. They warned us this would happen. This has to be stopped.”

Rational Thought on January 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM

“It’s the end of change as we know it” if Brown wins MA

Let us pray!

Johan Klaus on January 16, 2010 at 3:29 PM

So if I don’t identify with one of two groups, that makes me a troll. Can you say ‘prejudice’?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Ouch

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 3:29 PM

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

How about young?

Cindy Munford on January 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Ed and AP need to find us a new stock of trolls to keep the skills sharp.

ted c on January 16, 2010 at 2:41 PM

There were a couple of hammer thumps in the distance and the jungle went silent.

Yoop on January 16, 2010 at 3:32 PM

Dense and pompous is no way to go through life, son.

kingsjester on January 16, 2010 at 2:46 PM

So far it’s worked for Obama.

Yoop on January 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM

My sister in Boston says she knows so many people who are beside themselves with excitement to actually cast a vote for the first time that they feel actually means something.

txmomof6 on January 16, 2010 at 3:55 PM

“If I lived in Masachusetts I’d try to vote 10 times…Yeah, that’s right. I’d cheat to keep these bastards out.”

Rational Thought on January 16, 2010 at 3:15 PM

He Ed, since we’re discussing ‘ifs’ here…if yer heart wasn’t the size of canned ham, you wouldn’t sweat so much and the veins in yer forehead wouldn’t bulge so much and maybe more oxygen would make it to yer pea brain.

Disclaimer: The above post is directed at Ed Schultz…not Ed Morrissey.

Thanks in advance…

BigWyo on January 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM

datadriver on January 16, 2010 at 1:11 PM

Your Tolkienesque poem was wonderful. It deserves it’s own separate posting.

Mojave Mark on January 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM

It’s the end of change as we know it” if Brown wins MA

Thank heavens for that! May we be so blessed!!!!

chai on January 16, 2010 at 4:32 PM

So if I don’t identify with one of two groups, that makes me a troll. Can you say ‘prejudice’?

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Dark-Star supports a Third Party.

thomasaur on January 16, 2010 at 4:34 PM

It’s the end of change as we know it” if Brown wins MA

Thank heavens for that! May we be so blessed!!!!

chai on January 16, 2010 at 4:32 PM

AMEN to that!!!

Roy Rogers on January 16, 2010 at 4:35 PM

Comments from Crazy Land:

A Sullivan reader writes:

I’m trying to remain hopeful Martha Coakley will win the election next Tuesday, but that is difficult to do when listening to radio talk shows. I’m not talking about the right wing talk shows, I’m talking about the respected middle-of-the-road shows on WBZ-AM radio in Boston. My god, there is so much anger out there.

Hmmm, could it be Barack Obama and the Democrats are generating that anger? No, that is too easy, lets blame Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh instead.

This Sullivan reader however is no fan of Coakley:

Let me suggest that if you view torture as an unacceptable human rights violation, you should be mortified by Coakley. The blurb you excerpt from Radley Balko’s piece didn’t address the most troubling case from Coakley’s career—the Amirault case. Any prosecutor that would continue to press the Amirault case in light of what was known when Coakley took it over is a bigger threat to human rights than Scott Brown. And I would seriously question the commitment to human rights of anyone who didn’t feel the same way.

If you’re wondering how Coakley truly feels about the rights of terror suspects from across the globe, you might want to look at how she felt about the rights of the accused when it came to people living in her own county.

I agree with that. Coakley is a scary scary person willing to crush anyone to get ahead. Will Sullivan acknowledge it? Of course not, he has not even acknoweledged that Obama has for the most part followed most of George Bush’s foriegn policies.

Andrew Sullivan sums up his views as such:

The Republican party right now is largely bonkers. The Democratic party is a lily-livered hackfest of mediocrity. I remain of the view that Obama is the best thing going for this country. But between the insanity on the right and incoherence on the left, he is marooned in a lonely center. Maybe in the long run, this is a better place to be. Right now it is making governance close to impossible, at a moment when we need all hands on deck.

That comment induced me to protectile vomit on the cat.

There is of course a solution for Andrew.

Mr. Joe on January 16, 2010 at 4:42 PM

Obama is a strange combination. He approached the issue of delivering on his promises in a kind of robotic check-off list.

Mortgage relief bill….check (although nobody qualifies).
Consumer credit bill….check (although it’s the same as the last one. We get bigger print now).
Etc.

On big issues, he’s disappointed his base by continuing Bush policies. So far, I can’t disagree with those. They are obvious no-brainers for the US.

On administration style? What a flop. How silly he must feel going after Fox, Rush, etc., now with MA in play. Hello? You can’t jeer away populist movements.

Is he for HCR or not? Today, it sounds like a deal-breaker. It sure didn’t earlier. He has now crossed the line in making deals, in my opinion. When I get taxed by my gov’t worker buddy escapes due to the union?

Now wait just a minute, buddy.

AnninCA on January 16, 2010 at 4:47 PM

Is he for HCR or not? Today, it sounds like a deal-breaker. It sure didn’t earlier. He has now crossed the line in making deals, in my opinion. When I get taxed by my gov’t worker buddy escapes due to the union?

Now wait just a minute, buddy.

AnninCA on January 16, 2010 at 4:47 PM

This entire plan is about confiscation of wealth in order to give it to someone more “worthy” than the person who earned it. Are you just now figuring that out?

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM

“If Republicans want to campaign against this plan and stand up for the status quo and the insurance companies I welcome this fight.”

Nice non sequitur, Obama.

cpaulus on January 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM

Dark-Star supports a Third Party.

thomasaur on January 16, 2010 at 4:34 PM

Tentatively named the ‘Why can’t we all just get along?’ party.

Or the ‘I have no convictions’ party….

Liberalism 101??

BigWyo on January 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM

This entire plan is about confiscation of wealth in order to give it to someone more “worthy” than the person who earned it. Are you just now figuring that out?

ladyingray on January 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM

No, but I’m a bit more pragmatic than you. I think it’s a matter of paying off key supporters, which includes a strange combo of lobbyists for the HC industry as well as union/gov’t workers.

I think that the clearest argument/debate is whether we want either party, whether GOP or Dem, to get a pass when they give their supporters a “leg up.” Bush did that. The lack of support for insider GOP would be as vociferous right now as for the Dem insiders, for the same reason.

Straighten up, politicians. Get with real people and their real agendas.

Right now, things are tense, for good reason. But even when things relax, politicians who represent us should remember this fragment of an era.

It just doesn’t pay to play to your insiders and ignore the voters.

AnninCA on January 16, 2010 at 5:10 PM

Great picture of Schultz on the main page. Now that’s what a Tea Bagger really looks like. There nothing funnier than a Fat #@&.

ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 5:34 PM

I hope for the best but I still dont think the GOP has learned the real lession of 2008.
William Amos on January 16

Ya got a point, but I don’t think the pols are being faked.

Winning ugly is a win none the less.

DSchoen on January 16, 2010 at 6:01 PM

Two things: A. Scott Brown is not the “Tea Party” candidate, Ed; Joe Kennedy is. B. It’s your health care bill that stands up for the insurance companies, Mr. President, which is why they’re behind it. Did you think we didn’t notice?

SukieTawdry on January 16, 2010 at 6:12 PM

http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Martha%20Coakley

Scroll down to the 2nd vote, be a troll and vote for Brown.

Play with their minds like they have been doing with ours.

You know what paybacks are.

Jayrae on January 16, 2010 at 3:18 PM

Thanks 4 the link.
Mind games R fun.

redridinghood on January 16, 2010 at 6:17 PM

PLEASE SEND SCOTT $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

OmahaConservative on January 16, 2010 at 6:20 PM

PAGING MR CARVELLE! Your “40 year Progressive Era” is about to end after only 13 months! How did you numbnuts accomplish that?

GarandFan on January 16, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Democrats: take note. This is what your unchecked, absolute power and liberalism have wrought.

Now witness the power of this armed and operational tea party.

Black Adam on January 16, 2010 at 7:50 PM

Poor Dems. They put all their Hope&Change in one little basket from crooked Chicago which was riddled with drama (party crashers, Beer Summit), lies (“it will be on C-Span”;) kabuki theater (staged town halls & doctor lab coats), and tax cheaters galore!

Gird your loins, Dems. And get ready to spend a ton on election 2010.

TN Mom on January 16, 2010 at 8:06 PM

The below was a response I wrote to a knuckle head on AZ republic newspaper website

O.K. lets suppose we do loose in Mass …. craig claims we won’t be able to claim victory ….. * GRIN * want to bet ….. well lets see how we might be able to do so …..shall we ….. resources ….the democrats are pissing away money and time in an effort to keep a seat they NEVER expected to have to fight for. This is money they will NOT have for races which are more questionable ….this is time and effort from people who may not have the time and effort to expend elsewhere later. The money the Republicans have spent have largely come from small donations …. I believe the average donation for Browns money bomb on Monday was less than 80.00 he raised 1.3 million in 24 hours. I have also heard that he has continued to raise 1,000,000 a day since then. Perception ….this is the biggy …… democrats have already been perceived to have been badly mauled in this race, Think of it this way the democrats have had to call in the cavalry ( obama and clinton ) to save coakley’s ass for TED ( THE SWIMMERS ) KENNEDY’S senate seat. Its kinda like having to call in the U.S. Marines to save the Popes seat from being occupied by a muslim. If the democrats want to claim victory after this one ….IF they win and thats big IF …let them, the folks who make their living as elected democrat officials in Washington D.C. can hear the bell tolling and they know for whom it tolls

Aggie95 on January 16, 2010 at 8:11 PM

there isn’t much reason to linger to November to take his well-deserved beating at the polls.

After all the post-digestive stench bombs that Creepy Grandpa Harry the tourist sniffer has forced this nation to endure, I hope his pomposity leaves him hope enough to stick it out. That way every stinking tourist in America will have the unspeakable joy of watching, in real time, the most poetic, justified, well earned and unquestioningly Karmic moments in a generation of politics.

I’ll smile when I tell my grandkids, “I remember where I was when I first heard that Dingy Harry had lost…” Then I’ll smile even wider when they say, in unison, “Who?”

realityunwound on January 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM

I’ve got to catch be thrown under a bus very soon.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

FIFY

Mangy Scot on January 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM

Fascists on the left have this very sick loyalty to Hussein, the likes of which I’ve never seen before. They have no loyalty to the office of the president, but to him.

Sickening. And troubling.

madmonkphotog on January 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM

Mangy Scot Mongrel on January 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM

I have no doubts that a few posters would throw a party if I were actually run over by a bus, despite their supposed moral superiority.

Heck, if this were the early colonial days I suspect there’s already be a musket-bearing crowd on the way to ‘cleanse’ the town of the dissenter.

Dark-Star on January 16, 2010 at 10:07 PM

Ted Nugent has one for them….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eISPP6zuNE

njpat on January 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM

geez……
liberals can only ridicule, pull the race card, use double-standards or claim “flat earther” when they have no chance to win the debate… even when it should be obvious to themselves they are wrong…
and yet, in time, they reveal their true nature when they say something like, “i would CHEAT to keep them out…” rather than have the principles to refrain from such tactics – in a democracy…
ah, but principles are what they lack…
so when a conservative would suggest an I.D. be shown at the voting booths, they’re called discriminatory and evil… while liberals would not hesitate to count every no-show or dead person or count a real ballot more than once through agencies like acorn, etc., to cheat all they can, as much as they can.
this ed schultz and others like him make me want to hurl.

thedude on January 17, 2010 at 1:35 AM

Is it a crime to promote criminal activity on the airwaves?

Fighting Eyeball on January 17, 2010 at 2:43 AM

Democrats are exempt from laws, you know.
`
Isn’t this the same guy the North Dakota Democrats have approached about running for the open Senate seat there? I hope he does run! Keep talking, pal . . .

Adjoran on January 17, 2010 at 4:29 AM

The Second Revolut!on has begun in the very place where it all began. How sweet.

TXUS on January 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM

As someone said–”the shot heard ’round the world”–this is such delicious irony…

lovingmyUSA on January 17, 2010 at 7:16 AM

The Revolution started in the hearts of the colonists long before the war started.

ted c on January 17, 2010 at 7:21 AM

If Obama has to go defend a seat in Massachusetts, a liberal bastion, what does that say for later this year? He cannot defend everywhere, he cannot visit all of the seats that are going to need defending, and his compadres in the Congress do not possess the horsepower to mount an adequate defense. They are going to be fighting a battle to mitigate the attrition they are now suffering. Barney Frank indicated as much in his remarks on Thursday.

ted c on January 17, 2010 at 7:23 AM

John Adams said that the Revolution existed in the hearts of the colonists long before the “war” started.

ted c on January 17, 2010 at 7:24 AM

there must be certain words that dump comments into a watch list.

ted c on January 17, 2010 at 7:24 AM

The real irony is that if the Socialist Express can be derailed, it may save Obama’s Presidency.

drjohn on January 17, 2010 at 8:08 AM

Anyone whom tries to argue with “Trollus Maximus” (a.k.a. Dark-Star) is wasting a lot of valuable space in the comments section, and putting unnecessary mileage on their keyboard.
You might as well argue with Obama, Pelosi, or Reid.
What a waste.

Cybergeezer on January 17, 2010 at 9:10 AM

Brown has a fighting chance, that’s all.

True_King on January 17, 2010 at 9:13 AM

I emailed Ed’s show and told them it made me sick that he supported voter fraud.

Their response was just “good”.

This is who we are dealing with.

CWforFreedom on January 17, 2010 at 9:20 AM

Calling in Obama is not going to change the outcome of change that will occur when the Republicans (NO, the public U.S.) reject the change that was promised to assure real change takes place.

MSGTAS on January 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM

It may be easy to ignore the cries of the “Tea Bag” bunch, but when “true blue” MA goes for a Republican to replace old Teddy, ignoring them will not be an option. The only mistake that the Democrats have not made that would make this pending defeat even more complete is if they had name the ObamaCare bill after Teddy.
So far though, the ObamaCare bill and the Senate special election have acted as a near perfect stand in for a Ted Kennedy memorial in the proportions and flavor of that given to Paul WellStone.

J_Crater on January 17, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Even lousy candidates get elected to statewide [and federal] office in the Bay State United States as long as they have a D R next to their name

Is there a difference? Nebraskans, South Carolinians, and Alaskans come to mind at the moment. The vast majority of Republicans and “conservatives” think: “Democrats are scary. Republicans, well, they aren’t as scary. Vote Republican.” It’s no wonder our country is as dorked up as it is.

Send_Me on January 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Nobody believes anything Al Gore says. And, there is nothing he can say that will get black, Obama voters to the polls, since there are no black people running for Senate.

BottomLine5 on January 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM

TOO MUCH SEIU members for Brown?

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=video&video-id=2962

CWforFreedom on January 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM

If Scott Brown wins, I will be so ecited to send a message to Ed “the Communist Sympathizer” Schultz stating that THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF CHANGE AS WE KNOW IT!! Change back to real American conservative values. Changing back to the country our forefathers built for us, changing the elected officials – out with all the scum – and in with honest people, regardless of party. Have a nice day, Ed…. you big turd.

HomeoftheBrave on January 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Dohhhh! ecited = excited….

HomeoftheBrave on January 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM

CHope on it Ed!

ronnyraygun on January 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM

I feel like that part part of the Superman movie where our Superman comes out of nowhere to beat on their evil Superman!

abobo on January 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM

I got out of this; the only time the 0ne wants to fight for something is when a Republican is involved.

4shoes on January 17, 2010 at 12:10 PM

The Obama clip is awful. He comes off as a partisan hack and not presidential at all.

chaswv on January 17, 2010 at 12:13 PM

I really hope that the MA GOP has enough election judges and poll watchers… Stopping Dem/union/ACORN election fraud is most important in any election these days.

Dasher on January 17, 2010 at 3:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4