Not a shocker: Police department that “acted stupidly” endorses Brown
posted at 9:24 am on January 16, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
In July, the very last time Barack Obama held a press conference, Obama took the time to offer his thoughts on the professionalism of the Cambridge Police Department in their arrest of his friend Henry “Skip” Gates. After saying that Sergeant James Crowley “acted stupidly” despite not having “all the facts,” several of Crowley’s colleagues expressed their support of him by announcing that they wouldn’t vote for Obama in 2012. Their union has found a way to make their displeasure known much earlier — by endorsing Scott Brown over Martha Coakley:
All Members,
Members of our Association have inquired and requested that we endorse Scott Brown in the upcoming election against Martha Coakley. Ms. Coakley along with some of her campaign workers have talked publicly about how her husband is a retired Cambridge Police Officer, giving appearances that she is being endorsed by the Cambridge Police. This may be an innocent insinuation but most do take this as our giving her our support and endorsement. Yesterday, the CPPOA Executive Board voted to endorse State Senator Scott Brown in the upcoming election for US Senate. In an 11 to 2 vote, the Executive Board voted overwhelmingly in favor of the endorsement. We do not endorse anyone who advocates changes in the health care that take away any bargaining rights or increases our cost along with our contributions. Senator Brown does not support the Comprehensive Healthcare Reform Bill and promises to be the 41st vote to ensure its defeat. The current leadership at the state house, as we all know and have seen over the past two years, have an agenda to dismantle all of our hard earned bargained benefits and they will continue to dismantle these until there is a complete change from the top down. Martha Coakley is part of this Massachusetts leadership and she will continue with this agenda, only now it will be at the capital level and we need to stop it. So today, we the members of the Cambridge Police Patrol Officers Association endorse Scott Brown for the senate seat vacated by Senator Kennedy.
Fraternally,
Stephen Killion
President Cambridge Police
There are a couple of points of embarrassment here. First, Coakley’s husband, as Killion notes, was a former Cambridge police officer. Not only didn’t that give Coakley an edge, the 11-2 vote shows that it didn’t make much difference at all. Note too that the union opposes Coakley expressly on ObamaCare, but from the perspective of protecting their collective bargaining ability. They’re accusing her of being more or less anti-union, an interesting charge coming from any union towards a Democrat.
The other embarrassment comes with having an AG get opposed by a police union, which we saw in Worcester as well. We missed another instance of a police organization turning its back on the highest-ranking law enforcement officer in the state earlier this week, too — when the State Police Association of Massachusetts endorsed Scott Brown:
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I wonder how the racist, marxist democrats are going couch this as a mean spirited Republican attack. That’s their usual response when their own past actions come back to bite them in the @$$.
CurtZHP on January 16, 2010 at 9:28 AM
Because they really know Martha.
bayview on January 16, 2010 at 9:28 AM
Good for them! There’s nothing more heartwarming than having all the cops against Coakley.
disa on January 16, 2010 at 9:30 AM
Go Scott GO…Kick her butt all the way to the bay and toss her liberal ass in the drink…
How’s the tea now Martha….
hawkman on January 16, 2010 at 9:30 AM
I don’t think even a beer summit will save Martha at this point.
wildcat84 on January 16, 2010 at 9:31 AM
Cops–climbing back out from underneath the bus and seizing the wheel.
.
.
Beer summit–fail
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:33 AM
Wow…I certainly hope there is no retaliation by the leftists in power.
It restores my hope in the innate goodness of common people. That we aren’t alone, and all the pushes by the left to tell us how “everyone else thinks this but you” have been an epic fail.
hoosiermama on January 16, 2010 at 9:33 AM
Keep donating folks! And volunteer if you can. Theyve got phone banks on his website.
moonbatkiller on January 16, 2010 at 9:34 AM
I sure hope he wins!!!!!
Key West Reader on January 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM
Does subZero like apples?
How do ya like these apples?
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM
I hope all those cops that have to pull security detail tomorrow wear Scott Brown stickers on their bikes/helmets.
.
We want BROWN SCOTTS NOT BROWN SHIRTS
.
messages
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM
When the Obama “Where did it go wrong” timeline is finally chronicled, the Skip Gates/Cambridge PD intervention will be the marker. Up until then, the majority of independents looked at criticism of him as far-right/GOP/Limbaugh bitchiness. The press conference was the first time he verified what so many on the right had been warning about; he’s not post-racial, he’s a professorial elitist that is going to merge Big Brother tactics with the Nanny Statist mentality.
He knows it as does his crew, which is why we haven’t had another press conference.
budfox on January 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM
It should not go unmentioned that there is likely no more liberal city in America that Cambridge, Massachusett(e)s.
Martha Coakley has ‘acted stupidly’.
turfmann on January 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM
I don’t think even a beer summit will save Martha at this point.
wildcat84 on January 16, 2010 at 9:31 AM
Was that just the most ridiculous thing?
bernzright777 on January 16, 2010 at 9:40 AM
Will this be the first time in his life that subZero faces consequences for something he has said?
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:43 AM
Who can forget a Cop, Skip and a Chump from the White House?!
BTW, the Boss was on Fox yesterday talking about the MA Senate race. She’s at her best. You go, girl.
Christian Conservative on January 16, 2010 at 9:43 AM
I guess this is one of those “chickens come home to roost” scenerios. The Dems are learning you cannot say whatever you want and not eventually be held accountable by the American people, sometimes it just takes us awhile.
gator70 on January 16, 2010 at 9:43 AM
You bet they know Choakley. Her husband is a retired Cambridge police officer. Guess they couldn’t stand her on or off the job.
bartonbulletin on January 16, 2010 at 9:43 AM
And even though I don’t think they are allowed to endorse any candidate, I’m pretty sure that the Massachusetts National Guard is 100% behind Lt. Colonel Scott Brown.
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM
No surprise after reading about some of her records as a prosecutor.
scalleywag on January 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM
Gotta love Drudge. He has got a link up that says:
Obama to Mass. on Sunday – to Help Sinking Candidate
I don’t think they have a prayer.
singlemalt_18 on January 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM
Let me guess, ol’ Martha won’t be making chips-n-dips for the hubby and da boys for the games this afternoon….
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:45 AM
This is something that has baffled me about unions over the past 25 years. Why should any union be concerned about the quality of health care for any one except their members?
Having negotiated long and hard for these benefits what is the point of surrendering them? No matter what type of Health Care gets put into place it will be lousier then anything the top unions have negotiated for. This is a little like having your lawyer suggest you should plead guilty for the good of all defendants or something.
Worse the Democrats push for open borders and the unions are fine with it. It’s crazy.
The problem is the SEIU. They have become synonymous with the word union and they are entirely run be socialists/communists. They could care less about the union worker except for the ability to pay dues.
Rocks on January 16, 2010 at 9:46 AM
I would suggest that all those good officers volunteer to protect Brown voters at the polls on Tuesday. You know those union thugs will be bussed in by the droves. That and everyone needs to wear purple.
bloggless on January 16, 2010 at 9:47 AM
I hope someone is keeping a close eye on the absentee ballots coming from the military. I’ll bet that at least 95% of those votes will go to Brown, which makes them a huge target to the Powers that Be.
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 9:48 AM
Could you imagine being that woman’s husband and walking into the ol’ joint and sipping a beer with the guys? “Hey Frank, wassup wid da wife bustin’ on the Sox?” Poor sap—that’s gotta be torture up there.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:48 AM
The Cambridge Police just bought Senator Brown a beer!
Roy Rogers on January 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM
While Brown’s victory is not (yet) a foregone conclusion, I think this bears some thought. That a Republican, one expressly opposed to the Liberal Holy Grail of socialized medicine, can even be this close with a real solid shot at winning in Massachusetts of all places, for the seat held by a Kennedy all of my life no less, has some serious and very interesting implications when expanded nationwide.
We’ll see for certain on Tuesday, but all along I’ve wondered just how far this Awakening had penetrated the average American. At this point, it would appear to be quite deep, leaving me hope that the country just might survive this after all.
JamesLee on January 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM
That guy wins, he’s drinking free no matta where he goes for a looong time.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM
I think the deal is that under Obamacare, they get to keep their healthcare plan. But the dopes don’t know that it is just for now. Once, barry accomplishes the theft of America’s health insurance policies, he will make a grab for theirs and under the bus they will go. Police officers are smarter than the seiu thugs, they know what will happen. If nothing else, maybe the seiu thugs will think about this.
bloggless on January 16, 2010 at 9:51 AM
Barack Obama’s IQ is off the charts.
GENIUS!
jeff_from_mpls on January 16, 2010 at 9:51 AM
Nope, not a shocker. But oh so funny.
I’m not completely convinced that this is gonna help Brown win – let’s remember where it is we’re talking about. The SEIU busses are rolling into the state even as we speak. It is, however, evidence that the liberal establishment in Massachusetts isn’t used to having to work for a Senate seat. They never had to do this much to keep Teddy in office; obviously, they’re a bit rusty in the campaign management department. Coakley is a loose cannon – one with a few screws loose and/or missing. A smart campaign would have figured out how to keep her gaffes to a minimum, at least until after she was seated.
Too bad for them. Bwaaahaaaahaaaa!!!!
uncivilized on January 16, 2010 at 9:51 AM
So he’s finally picked a church?!
IrishEi on January 16, 2010 at 9:51 AM
Barack Hussein Obama: “But, but, but…As I have said in the past, they are acting stupidly!”
Yoop on January 16, 2010 at 9:52 AM
And I’m going to Party like it’s 1776!
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 9:52 AM
This is so delicious that it is happening up in Massachusetts. Those folks, despite the Kennedy Dem history, are utterly surrounded by the ghosts of John and Abigail Adams, Sam Adams, Paul Revere, overwatched by bunker hill monument. I have faith that there is a helluva lot of introspection occurring right there. Admit it or not, there’s a Tea Partier inside each and every Bostonian.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:53 AM
Someone hack the Anointed One’s teleprompter:
But seriously folks, if you like me and the job I’ve been doing, you’ll LOVE Martha. So lemme give a shout out to all my fellow coak-heads: let’s give it up for the Coak-meister.
Yes we can!
jeff_from_mpls on January 16, 2010 at 9:56 AM
Purple Shirts are the new Brown Shirts (and I don’t mean Scott).
Beware the SEIU-ACORN Axis of Evil.
J.J. Sefton on January 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM
On deck: The Unprecedented seizes his opportunity to “act stupidly” tomorrow. There are those who say he’s coming to Massachusetts knowig full well that Marfa has the election in the bag. Let me be clear, he’s coming because he’ll be campaigning and that’s all he knows how to do. However, his aura of invincibilty has vanished and all will see him as the preening, shallow and narcissistic gasbag he’s been all along.
Wednesday will be the first anniversary of his inauguration; Massachusetts voters will present hIm with an appropriate gift by taking away from him one of the wrecking bars by which he has attempted to demolish this country’s institutions: the Democrats’ supermajority in the United States Senate. You earned this, sir; you earned this!
ya2daup on January 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM
jeff!
The Dems top Coak-dealer. Sellin’ it all over the place, Coak-here, Coak-there—-hell, the cops won’t even touch it.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM
My God, it was only 2 short weeks ago that people were wondering where the national party was in their support for Scott Brown. The question was: “Does the GOP know there is a special election for Senate in Mass.?????”
You are correct Scott Brown; you don’t owe the national party anything! You did it on your own.
David2.0 on January 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Brown supporters need to convince the bussed in voters that they need to vote for the brown guy not that rich, white woman.
bloggless on January 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM
Chicago-style politics only works when the victims of it lay down and passively submit to it.
Kudos to the Cambridge police for jamming this right into Obama’s face. Had he not made that “stupidly” remark – this whole endo would have gone unnoticed. Now it’s national news.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it Democrats.
HondaV65 on January 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM
The Dems need to put a big Coak rock in their pipe and smoke it on Tuesday and ask themselves one question: “Are we….acting stupidly?”
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM
Karma’s a bitch, eh barry?
bloggless on January 16, 2010 at 10:02 AM
This wouldn’t be half as enjoyable if each and every act of this psychodrama was not 100% self-inflicted by Barack Hussein Obama and his machine.
We’re just sitting back, watching.
jeff_from_mpls on January 16, 2010 at 10:02 AM
Has Coakley even received any high-level endorsements, other than from the Boston Globe and the Kennedy family?
Bruce in NH on January 16, 2010 at 10:02 AM
This is your brain on coak.
jeff_from_mpls on January 16, 2010 at 10:03 AM
If millions across this nation can be utterly afflicted with the spirit of the 1773 Boston Tea Party, then those that live within miles of it can not stand idly by and remain unaffected. They have to be asking themselves, “What can I do for my country?”….a good question from Teddy’s bro.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Brown ad: On Tuesday, Don’t Do Coak!
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Just say No to Coak
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM
“The police acted intelligently”
JusDreamin on January 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM
Cops say No to Coak—this is a public service announcement
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Heck ya’. She has the endorsement of the Massachusetts Gay & Lesbian Political Caucus
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Coak don’t do a country good—
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Coak hearts Crooks: Cops say no to Coak
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:07 AM
If Brown wins, I will definitely uncork the champagne! However, I will wait until all the votes are counted because I haven’t forgotten that I once uncorked the champagne to celebrate the Red Sox winning the world series, and as I stood in front of the TV, bottle uncorked, I watched a very slow moving baseball go right through Billy Buckner’s legs. I will never forget it. We never did drink that champagne – so it was a loss on two counts!
KickandSwimMom on January 16, 2010 at 10:10 AM
Things go Badder with Kookley Coakley…
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 10:10 AM
Tea Party people are the FORCE to reckon.
Some may think they are just factions.
NO. THEY ARE THE SUPER MAJORITY!
Even my very liberal, Obama-loving, but “greedy” brother is now a Tea Party supporter.
TheAlamos on January 16, 2010 at 10:10 AM
Right through his legs…
ronnyraygun on January 16, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Most of my cousins in Cambridge are COPS. One was interviewed by Greta on FOX about the Skip Gates incident. I posted last night that they are telling me that they are conservative politically and this seems to validate that point.
AnthonyK on January 16, 2010 at 10:13 AM
We were all speechless, literally. Buckner will always be known for that one unforced error.
KickandSwimMom on January 16, 2010 at 10:13 AM
I really like the idea of seizing the SEIU’s characteristic color and making it ours during 2010. Someone yesterday likened it to the purple ink used to mark voters’ thumbs for the Iraq elections and how voters used it as a form of defiance against those who sought to prevent elections from occurring at all. To wrest this color from the union thugs will put them on notice that we know who they are, what they’re trying to do and we will have none of it by working to defeat them at every turn. But let’s not buy their shirts since doing so would put money in their coffers.
ya2daup on January 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM
SLAM!!!
*Sound of the casket on Coakley’s campaign.*
Saltysam on January 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM
America says Coak bad for your health: Cops agree
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM
the video from polling places in/around Massachusetts on Tuesday is going to be delicious
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM
9 out of 10 cops agree that brushing with Coak is not recommended.
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:16 AM
To those who have not already done so: PUT YOUR $$ WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS. Go to this website now: https://www.icontribute.us/scottbrown. No donation is too small.
Now that Obozo is campaigning for Coakley tomorrow, any $$ you contrbiute to Brown will be a direct body shot to Obozo and his socialist policies.
Let this be the beginning of nationalizing all significant Congressional races to turn the tide in 2010.
OneVision on January 16, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I just want to pass this along to New England HotAir readers:
Urban Infidel on January 16, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Well I don’t have any of the facts, it seems that the police have ‘acted stupidly’. yours truley uh um ah uh the 1 uh the O ah SH!T YOU KNOW WHAT ‘M SAYING
driver on January 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Boom! taste that nightstick, Coakley.
Geochelone on January 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM
As a former President of a police union, having bargained for health insurance, I can tell you that VERY FEW police unions will support Obamacare. Our premiums will go up as health insurance companies pass on the costs of increased premiums. Our re-insurance will go up. Everything will increase.
8 years ago we were part of a state/private insurance hybrid program. We negotiated to leave the state administered program and shop for our own insurance. Rates dropped by 300 dollars a month for a family plan. Coverage increased and expanded. We were able to bid for the coverage we wanted and tailor our program to our membership. I have no doubt that this same reality is why the union endorsed Brown. They see the numbers and understand the implications of a state run program administered through private insurance companies. Increased rates and less choice are the outcome.
Inzax on January 16, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Oh, that’s ridiculous, that’s a job for the professional journalists at the alphabet channels. /s
Saltysam on January 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM
I’m seeing a lot of pundits today predicting a win for Coakley based on Obama riding into Mass on his golden unicorn. I sure hope the Brown campaign has lawyers and poll watchers EVERYWHERE.
anniekc on January 16, 2010 at 10:26 AM
I can see the signs now: “Chicago 2016!!!”
OneVision on January 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Obama is bringing a lot of yard signs to Boston tomorrow that look like this:
Corzine 2009Deeds 2009Chicago 2016Coakley 2010
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM
recycling
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Coakley was Middlesex County DA for years,Cambridge is in Middlesex County!Good for the Cambridge Police.
tim c on January 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM
Lets face it, we found a conservative with good hair and a high forehead.
BROWN 2012!!!!!!
percysunshine on January 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM
I’d rather associate with Brownies than Coakheads.
TXUS on January 16, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Just words, Obama. Just words….
Oink on January 16, 2010 at 10:42 AM
The related graphics and “countdown clocks” just added the lame stream media touches to it too!
____
Oh, and Go Scott Go!
Branch Rickey on January 16, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Man ted c, you’re on a ROLL, baby. :)
hoosiermama on January 16, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Re: State Unions police and fire are different than all the others. They can get local community support for a tax increase when it directly affects them. Police almost always break for the GOP’er when Fire almost always breaks for the Dem. Just look at Kerry in ’04 and Rudy’s run. If MA fire hasn’t already endorsed Coakely, they will with Barry tomorrow. If they don’t back her, she is seriously done and it will be due to whatever threat Obamacare poses.
I don’t have a problem with public unions. What I despise is how under Barry they are trying to creep higher into the managerial and operational aspects of city and state. Across the country, we’re seeing elected officials knuckle under to unions by either not filling positions or making them union-only jobs. Before, we had a chance to cull some of the lazy public officials by changing councilman, mayors or governors, but the higher the union moves into management, the more impossible it will be without a lockout. That impending nightmare Barry will be face in the latter half of his term.
budfox on January 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM
gotta stay one step ahead of the ban hammer!
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Scottie’s gonna serve up some Brown Chowdah to Coakley on Tuesday.
(copped that one, no credit to me)
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Got a couple police in the family and like most police, their friends tend to be in law enforcement too since they have to be close to survive in their line of work. These have nothing to do with Cambridge but are, to a person, down on Obama and are sure to remain that way. Find myself wondering once again what universe Obama inhabits that he did not know that police are one of the most tightly knit groups in this country.
jeanie on January 16, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Obama needs to look around and see who rolls with his motorcade tomorrow.
Question of the day for tomorrow: “Who’s acting stupid now bub?”
ted c on January 16, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Public Unions: For over 33 years I was a member of one of the country’s biggest public unions, the NEA. I came to detest their tactics and often their point of view as I grew older and looked at them with a more sophisticated eye. Many(not all) school districts have high cost plans that could fall into these exclusive categories exempted by our upstanding and oh so honest legislators. This is a lot of exemptions. Is there going to be anyone paying anything at all out there?(except poor folk who don’t fall into any of these categories). Spread the wealth–yes, but who thought it would be spread the wealth among the wealthy. The Democratic Party is not, will not, cannot ever be the Party of the middle class and working classes ever again. Their credibility is blown. Throw them out!!!
jeanie on January 16, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Obama has managed in one short year to spit on:
■ The Police
■ The CIA
■ The Secret Service
■ Mossad (Israel)
I’m sure I’m missing some, but the point is that he has made some powerful enemies in places that can hurt him.
Dale on January 16, 2010 at 11:13 AM
So, he’s got the SPAM endorsement, is what you’re saying?
joe_doufu on January 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Hee that’s a fantastic letter – hee!
gophergirl on January 16, 2010 at 11:23 AM
I wonder if Obama will say that the Cambridge cops acted stupidly in their endorsement of the Croaker.
farright on January 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Big Business and the military as well.
Only thing missing is the Mafia. ;-)
David2.0 on January 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Always bet on Brown.
1921 C DRUM on January 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM
I hope the off duty police union members can/will assist in keeping an eye out at the polls for the Panthers and SIEU thugs.
GO BROWN!
Tom in Omaha
vietvet on January 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM
Well there are unions and there are unions. I am on the negotiating committee for our local non-classified education union. We are the employees of the school who are not classified teachers. We are the custodians, secretaries, teacher’s aides, etc. I am sure that none of us would even bother with a union except that the teacher’s union was so incredibly strong that we were actually getting pay and benefit cuts in order to finance the teacher’s salaries. The main benefit I see to a union membership for us is that the school board gets to look us in the eye and explain why they are paying us what they are paying us. They now have to have a reason for pay-cuts, etc.
Any-who, I have been watching the Obamacare debate very closely as a negotiator and not just for the entertainment value. I predict that when we start our negotiations next month, the uncertainty surrounding taxes on Cadillac Plans/no taxes on Cadillac Plans,what the heck counts as a Cadillac plan, is going to make everyone’s job that much harder. This is not lost on rank and file unions who are not part of the cabal that is under the covers with congress negotiating with Reid and Pelosi. Those of us who are NOT part of the in group know for a fact that we will be sold down the river or thrown under the bus without a thought.
There is no doubt in my mind that the Cambridge police union members, as stupidly as they may act at times, can see this coming as well.
Lily on January 16, 2010 at 11:41 AM
Lily: Yes, someone outside the inner circle always pays for the antics of the big unions. Even within the NEA, teachers at the bottom end of the seniority list were always the first to suffer on all fronts. Teachers at the top/middle were pretty much exempt from any repercussions at all–even those(sadly)who were known to be poor, ineffectual or outright bad educators. I was building rep for many years and repeatedly saw the kind of thing you describe–and not infrequently. Still, you and I know that it would be even worse if left to the whims of the school boards and local pols. Can it ever come out right? No, I guess.
jeanie on January 16, 2010 at 12:01 PM
With the amount of police and public safety endorsement that Scott Brown is getting, the thug techniques to steal the election from Brown may be in jeopardy.
onlineanalyst on January 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »