Local news shows are where the biased action is
posted at 3:35 pm on January 15, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Tucker Carlson’s new site, the Daily Caller, has an interesting essay from an anonymous TV anchorman with 30 years of journeyman experience in local news productions. While many people focus on the bias evident in national news broadcasts and other far-reaching media outlets, the essayist warns that the most significant bias happens on the local news broadcasts. He gives an inside look on how it gets accomplished:
For the better part of my adult life, I’ve worked as an anchor and reporter at CBS, NBC and ABC affiliated newsrooms across the country — often complaining about the nanny-state liberalism that infects so much of news coverage. Arguably, local news is a more insidious and destructive force than the widely accepted liberal bias of networks and other national components of mainstream media. After all, study after study has demonstrated that local news is more widely watched — and, more importantly, more trusted than other forms of mainstream media. There is a case to be made that the steady drumbeat of hyped-up threats — SUV’s that roll over, kitchen-counter bacteria, road rage, swine flu, amber alerts and the stations’ willingness to enlist governments and institutions to solve those “perceived” problems, actually drives a lot of bad and unnecessary public policy.
But it’s a formula that has worked as a cash cow for your local TV station. It is no accident that most local TV stations market themselves with nanny-state slogans: “Channel 2: Working for you!” or “ABC 6: On your side!” You might say those slogans are a subtler version of, “NBC 5: Making your boo-boos all better!”
I’ve lived in three major media markets — LA, Phoenix, and the Twin Cities — and visited many more. The TV news is indeed formulaic in this manner. But why is that so? The answer is rather surprising — and rather sexist, too:
I’ve used the example of breast implants, but the formula works for any perceived wrongdoing. And even if trial lawyers aren’t involved, victim status is — with the promise of fixing the boo-boo — “Working for you.” As one news director I worked for once said, “There are lots of things to be afraid of out there.” Indeed, cancer, household bacteria, child predators, hot weather, cold weather, tap water, electromagnetic fields, vaccinations, Chinese food, Mexican food, racism, fertilizers, homophobia, hate crimes, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
And, who is most likely to be afraid of these threats? Well, the mainstream media machine, cynically and manipulatively, believes it’s that key demographic group, women ages 18-49. They, according to consultants and marketing executives, control the household remote and make the buying decisions. No. One. Else. Matters.
In an ultimate display of hypocritical sexism, your local liberal newsroom treats women of that coveted demographic group as if they were frightened wards of the nanny state, as if they were children incapable of weighing risk against advantage, detriment against benefit. It plies them with a daily dose of all the things one must be afraid of. And it cynically taps into those traits that evolution has bestowed women with in greater quantity than men — compassion and empathy.
Anonymous has much more, so be sure to read it all. The main point is indeed troubling. While these news stations often use the free market to pressure wrongdoers into penance and restitution by exposing their poor business practices and damaging their bottom lines, they contribute to a culture in which people demand not just market action but government intervention. We must be protected from all of these deadly threats to our existence, after all, and that means bigger and more intrusive government rather than just education and individual action — at least in the minds of people watching these hyperbolic special reports.
If we want to build a culture of dependency, this is the best way to do it — from the ground up. Watch your own local news shows and see how much of their broadcasts, and especially their promotions, are built on fear. It’s mind-blowing.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
And it wastes my money and those who put in commercials during prime time.
upinak on January 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM
Conservative women of the world, unite? And stop watching TV news? Probably already have, actually.
kc8ukw on January 15, 2010 at 3:38 PM
This is true, though hardly a revelation.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:39 PM
Figures.
HowardRoarke on January 15, 2010 at 3:40 PM
“Breaking! This may kill you and your family right now!!, Tune in a 6:00pm to find out. “
Caper29 on January 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM
I haven’t watched any of the local fire and stabbing reports for at least 20 years. Maybe that’s why I am what I am.
Akzed on January 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM
Television is there to sell things, whether they call it ‘news’ or ‘infomercial’.
Vashta.Nerada on January 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM
Is that why it is always a young good looking lady who is home alone when someone decides to break in.
fourdeucer on January 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM
It’s good to be a man.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:43 PM
One need only look at how the local media here in Raleigh-Durham treated the Duke Lacrosse fake rape case. It was atrocious.
SouthernGent on January 15, 2010 at 3:43 PM
You should catch the NBC affiliate here in Boston sometime… especially at 11:00 p.m. I watch the beginning specifically for the hilarious sensationalism. The “7 News” graphics fly all over the screen — it’s like those Japanese cartoons that give kids seizures. And then, of course, there are the anchors (two women) who are so tarted up that it looks like they just came from a high priced hooker convention. If I were straight and desperate, I’d watch it with a towel. LOL
D2Boston on January 15, 2010 at 3:43 PM
Is there poison in your drinking water? News at 11
John the Libertarian on January 15, 2010 at 3:43 PM
+1
Black Yoshi on January 15, 2010 at 3:45 PM
“The bubble-headed bleach-blonde comes on at five. She can tell you ’bout the plane crash, with a gleam in her eye. It’s interesting when people die. Give us Dirty Laundry.”
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:47 PM
Local news is good for the weather, and that’s about it.
Unless they forcast a 50% chance of rain. Seriously? I might rain, or it might not. With a straight face even.
But other than that yeah, useless.
rollthedice on January 15, 2010 at 3:49 PM
Moscow in flames. Missiles headed toward New York. Film at 11.
LibTired on January 15, 2010 at 3:49 PM
Then why does she always undress and head for the shower? Or am I thinking movies…
Vashta.Nerada on January 15, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Weather? You are kidding right?
I can predict the weather better then our people on the news… and I am right more then these “meteorologists”.
upinak on January 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM
Imagine being one of the weather-girl out here in Southern California. (They’re almost all hot twentysomethings, now). Talk about a cushy gig.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:52 PM
don’t watch the local news here in phoenix, they love bashing sherriff joe here…
cmsinaz on January 15, 2010 at 3:52 PM
Even a ‘news’ channel will be trying to ‘sell’ their station by promoting viewership. More people watching their channel means more advertising $ for them. And thus have American news networks descended into yellow journalism and fear-mongering.
But don’t worry…I’m sure the free market will fix it all.
Dark-Star on January 15, 2010 at 3:52 PM
When I gave up network television, that included local news. If I need news, I turn on the radio, or go online…and pick and choose what local news I want to read.
Saves me a lot of headaches, and keeps me from smashing the ttv, when I get angry at obvious bias, and the crap that’s spewed.
capejasmine on January 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM
Minorities and the poor expected to suffer the most.
BobOfTexas on January 15, 2010 at 3:54 PM
The free market provides many things I don’t care for, so I don’t buy them. That’s not a bug.
Socialist.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM
OT, but have you ever noticed that in every single one of those commercials, the person breaking into the home is a young, white, male.
MarkTheGreat on January 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Intended for Dark-Star.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM
No, it cynically taps into a woman’s desire for security for herself and her children. Not that men don’t have that desire, but women are more risk averse and more likely to buy into the hyped crisis du jour.
RadClown on January 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM
There is no better example of this than Los Angeles, which Ed can attest to from living here. But that’s only half the story. There’s only so much air time on TV, so the news producers make choices.
Do they run a story about how government employee unions are stifling the economy in Los Angeles? Or maybe how these unions trade endorsements for cushy contracts?
Nope. More likely you’ll see a story about how the local government dial-a-ride program is such a necessity for the “disadvantaged.”
InterestedObserver on January 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Are you kidding? My local news: “OMG It’s January and it’s snowing!!!! For the love of God stay inside and don’t go anywhere!!!! We might get two whole inches of accululation!!!!! Save the children from the snowballs!!!!!”
Nanny state. blech.
patriette on January 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM
I think the local news is even more obnoxious than the national broadcasts. Can’t take either of them. “Here is what is wrong with everything around you”. Death, carnage and poverty is all that’s reported. The one uplifting story is the last 15 seconds of the broadcast.
search4truth on January 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM
I guess I already knew that. Which is why I quit watching local news + TV news in general.
Garbage.
And it’s no suprise they aim this stuff at women.
Sorry ladies, but as a woman I will admit that many of us are extremely histrionic, emotional, & unintelligible-at least once a month.
Badger40 on January 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM
er, accumulation.
patriette on January 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM
I stopped watching the local news after I realized it consisted of the stabbing and shooting report followed by the updates on the latest Hollywood divorces followed by the upcoming preview of that night’s “American Idol”/”The Bachelor”/”Survivor” packaged as a news story.
BobOfTexas on January 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Intellicast.com or your favorite webWeather.
When I had TV we just watched the local Nat. Weath. Svc info channel for our area.
Badger40 on January 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Yep. Now how did I manage all those years of being a young white male without breaking into the home of a beautiful, helpless you woman?
So much I missed out on, I guess.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Too childish to watch – so we don’t.
T J Green on January 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Of course, they all want to make it to the “big time”.
Harpoon on January 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM
I have a neighbor who is a lovely, lovely person but she is 60 and still believes everything she sees on shows like 20/20 and 60 minutes. Her kids make fun of her about it.
DaydreamBeliever on January 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM
I’m not surprised that you haven’t noticed. But the free-market has already fixed the problem.
1) It provides alternatives to the evening news.
2) It provides mechanisms by which individuals get the news out about these tactics, so that viewers can guard themselves.
MarkTheGreat on January 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Joe Biden says either spelling is acceptable.
LibTired on January 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM
LoL. So true.
rollthedice on January 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM
If this anonymous dude isn’t John Stossell I’ll eat my hat.
Tman on January 15, 2010 at 4:01 PM
My collie says:
Little wonder they hate anyone that possesses any religious convictions — ESPECIALLY Christians.
CyberCipher on January 15, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Women are more emotional & irrational than men are? No way. Next they’ll tell us that rocks tend to fall downward.
OhioCoastie on January 15, 2010 at 4:03 PM
I guess it depends on where you live. Around here, nobody gets excited unless their expecting at least 12 inches of snow.
MarkTheGreat on January 15, 2010 at 4:04 PM
Hooray for you.
Now how do you suggest we get some news stations that actually show…NEWS? You can’t possibly compete against the Chicken-Little crowd with the way the system currently works. So do we tweak the system or just consign the realm of useful, informative TV to reruns and fading memories?
Dark-Star on January 15, 2010 at 4:04 PM
Is the water you’re drinking killing you?!?!?
We’ll tell you what you need to know after the break.
Scrappy on January 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM
+1
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM
Union’s are huge in the local media. A friend moved from a camera / reporter job to an anchor job. There was a huge story going on in the area and he grabbed a camera and headed out the door. He was stopped leaving the building and was told to wait for a camera operator. He was an anchor and that wasn’t his job anymore.
PappaMac on January 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM
“Go F___ yourself, San Diego!”
revolutionismyname on January 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM
You’re using the alternative right now.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM
You see, the nifty thing about the free market is that it doesn’t waste time rehabilitating dying industries, it create new ones.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM
That line gave me a laugh.
I don’t think so. The only time I watch local news is if a snow day is in the cards. Do people actually watch that stuff? Local news is beyond parody: the young black female anchor with the seasoned white male anchor, both wearing power suits. The chubby morning traffic girl whose salary hasn’t yet let her move past purchasing her on-air wardrobe at Sears, in all the wrong colors. The short, obnoxious sports guy with the nasally voice who clearly never got picked for any teams as a kid. And the goofball weather guy with his “weather shot of the day” — “Hey, here’s the snow on Becky Smith’s deck out in Podunk County. It’s really piling up out there. Better bundle up the kiddos!” And for every urban murder story (and there’s at least 1 a night), they toss it over to the black male reporter they’ve sent to cover the ‘hood.
It’s painful to watch without the actual humor that Hollywood at least provides when they make movies about those very people.
Rational Thought on January 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM
Yeah….this is old news (no pun intended).
I grew up with local baltimore news and it didn’t take me long to realize every story played on your fears in one way or another. Watching the news there, you would think all that happens in B-mo is murder and fire….not that it is that far off the truth.
Joe Caps on January 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM
A very good friend of mine managed a major network-owned station in Houston for many years. He was a staunch conservative and was constantly fighting the network over this very thing.
They would push him to air these kinds of stories, which he hated, yet he usually prevailed due to his long time friendship with the Chairman of the network in NY.
Since my friend’s death, the station has devolved into the typically biased, pandering outlet that he so abhored.
TXUS on January 15, 2010 at 4:11 PM
There’s a lot of truth in what Anonymous says. It’s worth noting, though, that it’s not an organized attempt to push the nation to the left. Part of the problem is that empathy and compassion are considered traits held in higher esteem by liberals, and that politicians are generally willing to support a cause in the name of getting more votes.
Another element that drives local news is the increasing reliance on AP and other news feeds. If the AP says that the economy is getting better, it will be reported that way on your local newscast. Generally, the staffs at those stations don’t have the time or inclination to do their own analysis before airing wire stories, and often qualifying statements, buried deep in print stories, never make it into the compressed format of a TV newscast.
hawksruleva on January 15, 2010 at 4:12 PM
I haven’t watched local “news” broadcasts for well over a decade now. Why? I can read.
These shows are complete wastes of time with their bias for reporting anything banal, inane and inconsequential, all delivered in a manner that caters to folks whose collective intelligence is rapidly plummeting to the level of a bag of hammers.
ya2daup on January 15, 2010 at 4:12 PM
The monthly meeting of the Procrastinators’ Club has been postponed. More on this in tomorrow’s newscast.
kingsjester on January 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM
How is this any different than what advertising does, really? Is it really any more nefarious than a ratings gimmick?
Firefly_76 on January 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM
You noticed that too?
fourdeucer on January 15, 2010 at 4:15 PM
Well, thank you for at least giving me a non-insulting answer.
I’m rather hesitant to give a lot more credibility to the new sources of ‘news’ at large (not to disparage any blog in particular besides a few examples that suggest themselves), but it would seem there’s no turning back. Certainly the old sources aren’t getting any better!
Dark-Star on January 15, 2010 at 4:16 PM
When the TV digital switch-over happened last year, I bought a converter for my old TV, but have never used it. I will watch movies or shows on the internet, but I have not missed the TV one bit. Good riddance.
mydh12 on January 15, 2010 at 4:16 PM
The biggest howler in any local broadcast here on the East Coast were the weather forecasters. Whenever a “snow event” was in the offing, these clowns would go full-tilt into “weather hard-on” mode, breathlessly informing us that they’d “keep an eye on the developing storm” and that they’d “stay up all night keeping watch for us”.
Yeah, you go ahead and do that ChuckleNuts; I have a life. I’ve handled and survived far worse than the pansy-assed storms that drive locals around here into frenzied buying of bread, milk and toilet paper.
ya2daup on January 15, 2010 at 4:22 PM
And if history is any guide, the internet/blogging as it is now is temporary. Something new will replace it, maybe in our lifetime.
pugwriter on January 15, 2010 at 4:28 PM
I liked it when, in the movie LA Story, Steve Martin would pre-record all of his weather forecasts because it rarely changed. Kinda like here in SW Florida…
…but we stopped watching local news years ago…
ornery_independent on January 15, 2010 at 4:28 PM
I’ve had a similar take on the national media for decades.
They have their “star” journalists in Washington. Star journalists require face time. So any story that comes along, there’s the temptation to find a Washington angle. Best way to find a Washington angle is to cover it from a “government solution” viewpoint. And, just think: all those committee chairman so willing to hold high profile hearings and get their mugs on TV, too!
It’s incestuous.
jeanneb on January 15, 2010 at 4:30 PM
Ditto here. Closer to 30 years for me.
My wife and I turned off Jeopardy last year too. Got tired of all the ‘answers’ involving Obama, the Clintons, Gore eco-crap and the rest.
Suck it Trebek.
fogw on January 15, 2010 at 4:34 PM
That’s why the “news” follows Oprah every day in LA.
A friend of mine who used to be a news producer/editor confirms his essay. She tells her mom she needs a “news fast” when she gets scared by all these sensationalized stories.
PattyJ on January 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM
And this is where Dick Blumenthal shines! He’s there to fix the problem and thus Nutmeggers think he’s OK.
hotdax on January 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM
I’ve read about this ‘local TV news’ thing, but I can honestly say I’ve never watched it.
Aww dangit! I just went to the store and I forgot toilet paper. AAAAaaaaarghh.
bitsy on January 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM
The last time I remember being entertained (forget informed) by local news Willard Scott was still the local weatherman on one of the DC channels. He was snowed in on his farm in Virginia so he reported via speakerphone on the anchor desk. Being Willard he would not stop talking so the anchors finally swept the speakerbox off their desk.
Over50 on January 15, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Kudos to anonymous for sharing this rare insight, but I do have to say this is not “breaking news” for those of us conservatives who work in liberal-dominated newsrooms and have for years. In my shop, several managers were the driving force behind a half-hour special on global warming repeating the Goracles admonition that the “science was settled.” God forbid any of us on the othr side of the political fence speak up to suggest adding any type of balance to the report. As for nanny state actions, several years a co-worker suggested doing a special report on the growing movement by city and state politicians to ban everything from the circus to students wearing perfume to school. The general manager soundly rejected the idea, telling the employee that many things that are banned are good for society, and our viewers wouldn’t appreciate our station possibly casting them in a negative light. This is the reality of local TV news.
Goldy1 on January 15, 2010 at 4:44 PM
What I will never be able to understand is, why the run on toilet paper? Bread and milk made a little sense, but toilet paper? Are there heretofore unknown sinister forces at work in snowstorms that cause people to eliminate more?
ya2daup on January 15, 2010 at 4:47 PM
I’m “rather certain” you’re writing Nothing again. Do you actually say anything–or know anything? You spew vague broad opinions with no or virtually no actual reference points–like a college sophomore trying to BS her way through.
Janos Hunyadi on January 15, 2010 at 4:48 PM
Remember, they are liberals. Their Prius is not equipped for snow, but your F-250 will have no problem. They drive the little cracker box gas saving cars or ride bikes or trudge around on foot. We drive around in four wheel drives, especially in places where it can snow.
Who primarily supports getting SUVs and other big vehicles off the road? People in places like New York, with “good” mass transit and people in places like Los Angeles, where weather almost never affects traffic.
One year when I was living in Spokane there was a big outcry because the legislature was going to ban studded tires. Since the majority of Washington’s population is west of the Cascades where a week of snow is on the scale of Katrina in their minds, they had no idea what it was like for the geographical majority of the state in the winter. It got killed, but only by heavy duty lobbying by the eastern Washington crowd.
How this relates to the topic: Most “local news” comes out of the closest big city for those of us that live in small towns, and unless we have an a-hole cross dressing mayor, they don’t care about anybody outside of their urban enclave of prius-driving, capuccino-slurping world. We are all hicks to them who need to be educated that the world is too dangerous for us stupid people and we NEED HELP NOW, details at 11!
PastorJon on January 15, 2010 at 4:51 PM
But true – watch the next news “sweeps” period. I will guaran-dam-tee you that there will be at least 1 breast cancer scare story and half a dozen other womens health issue stories on your local news. I include childrens
The Logical Husband and I have commented on this for a number of years now.
LL
Lady Logician on January 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM
The last time I watched my local news was when the lead story was the latest craziness of Britney Spears.
I watched the local news in Austin, TX on vacation. They reported on a woman who had thrown her children into traffic. The woman reporter blamed the mother’s action on poverty.
HellCat on January 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM
How long ago was that? Michigan outlawed studded tires sometime in the late-70s or early-80s. They worked okay, but they tore up the roads something awful.
ya2daup on January 15, 2010 at 4:57 PM
Check whether or not your local news is a ‘CNN affiliate’ which gets its national and international content from CNN. The local news program will usually not boast about it, but there will be a brief logo on the screen at the beginning or the broadcast and / or they’ll make a brief mention of this.
The result is that you get Chicken Noodle News mixed in with the BOO news about how your cutting board is infested with KILLER BACTERIA
Last week a Florida local station had a panic story about the lack of Winter coats during the freeze. They did the story from inside a Burlington Coat Factory which had received a new shipment of coats earlier that day.
Janos Hunyadi on January 15, 2010 at 4:58 PM
That’s what I thought.
Hmmmm…..
Badger40 on January 15, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Numerous prestigious local and national reporting honors await this intrepid and resourceful news crew, and (Dare they think it? Dare! Dare!) perhaps a Pulitzer Prize!
ya2daup on January 15, 2010 at 5:03 PM
That is freaking hilarious.
You made my day with that one.
And here in ND when it’s 20 degrees out were in shorts & a T-shirt.
Badger40 on January 15, 2010 at 5:04 PM
we’re!
Badger40 on January 15, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Interesting, since this is one of the least impoverished major cities in the country. But this is, after all, Austin, where the cries of “foul” from Prius and Honda Element owners, gay activists, and unwashed bicyclists can be heard throughout the night…along with The Eyes of Texas and a coyote in the distance.
Erich66 on January 15, 2010 at 5:06 PM
The colder weather spread across to most of Europe, where Winter is damp and cold but not as Mucho Frigid as it has been this Jan. I don’t know of any Euro country which has the equivalent of American local news broadcasts
The government TV stations drone out snowplow schedules and which roadside assistance services are on strike again…
Janos Hunyadi on January 15, 2010 at 5:13 PM
Anonymous’s experience of local news is pretty different from mine. Perhaps he/she hails from a larger, and therefore more liberal, market. I used to work the web desk for a station in a market in the low 100s in DMA. That’s pretty mid-sized market. There was always a certain degree of that whole “what’s in your refrigerator could kill you!” sort of fear-mongering, but it depended on who the news director was at the time and what his philosophy was about that sort of sweeps period stuff. Also, consultants weighed VERY heavily in the content and tone of our newscasts — almost too much actually. Ultimately, I think whether something made it to air or not was dictated less by personal politics and more by personal relationships. If someone was on a story that might be damaging to one of our sponsors, or if the golfing buddy of the general manager was arrested on DWI, well those things tended to get buried pretty far down in the cast — if they made it to air at all. And our staff was so inexperienced (and in many cases, incompetent) that the idea of any of them having an agenda in their reporting would be laughable at best. They’d be lucky just to get their story on the air without any glaring errors. Of course we did take calls from people who claimed we were guilty of bias … but the calls came from conservatives claiming we were too liberal, and from liberals claiming we were too conservative. So I guess at least some of it — on the local level anyway — is just perspective. There were certainly many instances where we failed to get both sides of a story, but again, that was attributable more to stupidity or laziness on the parts of reporters and producers than it was evidence of an agenda.
Also, I find it interesting that he says local news is the most watched and most trusted. Again, I say that was not my experience. We were constantly hemorrhaging audience and it was pretty widely accepted that local news was on the road to extinction, that 24-hour cable news and the Internet had replaced network and local news (and newspapers) for most people.
And the demos we were most interested in were adults 25-54; I always thought the women 18-49 demo was the golden calf for entertainment programming but not so much for news. Interesting to note this is not the case in all markets.
NoLeftTurn on January 15, 2010 at 5:16 PM
Another pet peeve of mine on local news: they always say “have a safe night” or “safe holiday” like we’re all about to be killed. Watch the news and save yourselves!!!
Since when did sleeping and Christmas become dangerous, LOL?
PattyJ on January 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM
Who watches local news? I gave it up many years ago due to the ambulance chase narrative every single night. Oh plus the left wing moonshine they dish out. Those local news stations make no bones about what they are all about, unlike the national media that used to coo soothingly “we are neutral, we have no bias”.
richardb on January 15, 2010 at 5:30 PM
I figured it out in my late 20s and never looked back.
Queen0fCups on January 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Local news lineup on 98% of stations:
Hot blonde anchorite, older white guy, middle aged black guy doing “the news”
Witty guy, hot brunette, really wacky funny guy doing the weather
Black guy/ hispanic guy, old guy who’s been around since 1952 doing sports
angryed on January 15, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Sounds like they had my ex pegged.
DFCtomm on January 15, 2010 at 6:01 PM
So that once a month lasts 28-31 days depending on the month I take it?
So let me get this straight, it’s these women who drive ratings. That means what newsrooms are producing is what women want to see. Wouldn’t that then mean it’s not just newsrooms but women themselves who see themselves as or simply are “children incapable of weighing risk against advantage, detriment against benefit”?
jarodea on January 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM
My husband and I stopped watching tv almost a year ago, and don’t miss it a bit. Still have the set, just use it to watch dvd’s, no cable, so we couldn’t watch tv even if we wanted to. And we don’t watch tv shows via the internet, either.
Mulligan on January 15, 2010 at 6:36 PM
I can’t do it. Saving all that drama for my mama.
watson007 on January 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM
For more insight on this topic, read John Stossel’s book(s)
Resolute on January 15, 2010 at 7:49 PM
The newest thing to be afraid of? Government run amok! They are taking your dollars, they throw them down various rat holes and they avoid accountability for their failures.
We need local news that gets on the scent of government corruption.
crosspatch on January 15, 2010 at 9:48 PM
I’m more afraid of the brain cells TV news kills every day than anything they think they are reporting upon. No thanks.
And here I am, their target demographic. Guess I will have to get by without the hype and fear. ;)
tcn on January 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »