Unemployment claims, foreclosures “unexpectedly” rise again

posted at 9:30 am on January 14, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Okay, let’s be fair; the CNBC report on unemployment claims doesn’t use the word “unexpectedly.”  They save that for the retail numbers in December, which surprised analysts.  They expected a gain in December, but instead sales retreated from a bump upward in November:

The number of newly laid-off workers requesting unemployment benefits rose last week as jobs remain scarce amid a sluggish economic recovery, while holiday retail sales were weaker than expected as well.

The Labor Department said new claims for unemployment insurance rose by 11,000 to a seasonally adjusted 444,000. Wall Street economists polled by Thomson Reuters expected an increase of only 3,000. …

Sales at U.S. retailers unexpectedly fell in December as consumer spent less on vehicles and an array of other goods during the holiday shopping month, data showed on Thursday, raising concerns about the durability of the economy’s recovery.

The Commerce Department said total retail sales fell 0.3 percent last month, the first decline in three months, after rising by an upwardly revised 1.8 percent in November. Sales in November were previously reported to have increased 1.3 percent.

Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales gaining 0.5 percent last month.

I think Reuters needs some new analysts.  In their defense, they’ve been listening to the Obama administration spin numbers all year long, and the history of recessions would indicate that growth would have started occurring by now.  I’ll have more on that in a separate post, but clearly the direction of economic policy in 2009 has even the analysts scratching their heads.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, the housing market provided even more bad news:

Foreclosures jumped 14 percent in December 2009 from the previous month, according to a new report from foreclosure listing Web site RealtyTrac.com. …

In all, 349,519 properties received a foreclosure notice in December, up 15 percent from the year before. That’s one in every 366 housing units receiving a foreclosure notice, which is defined as a default notice, bank repossession or auction sale notice. …

Besides the monthly data, RealtyTrac also released foreclosure totals for 2009. Last year, 2.8 million US properties received foreclosure filings, a 21 percent increase from 2008 and a 120 percent increase from 2007.

The numbers fell short of the 3 million to 3.2 million foreclosures RealtyTrac had predicted for the year because the government’s mortgage modification program has temporarily slowed foreclosures that will most likely occur anyway, Sharga said.

In fact, those numbers would have been higher had some of the recipients of TARP funds not agreed to moratoriums on foreclosures.  BofA, Citibank, and Fannie Mae all postponed actions on foreclosures in the fourth quarter of last year.  That won’t keep homes out of foreclosure, however; it will just delay the inevitable for people who can’t afford their house payments.  All these policies did was drag out the pain into another year, and keep people shoving cash out the door they could have used to start fresh, sinking instead into homes they won’t be able to keep.

These numbers, along with December’s employment numbers, show that we’re not in recovery.  We’re not even close to recovery yet.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Yes but is this unexpected event unprecedented?

Oldnuke on January 14, 2010 at 9:31 AM

I question the timing.

Akzed on January 14, 2010 at 9:31 AM

With all the uncertainty caused by “healt care reform” and “cap and tax” who is going hire?

Caper29 on January 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM

WHAT?!

RILLY?

I DID NOT EXPECT THIS.

/erin burnett

blatantblue on January 14, 2010 at 9:33 AM

When Bush was in office, all of the economic news was portrayed negatively and on the front page of our local paper.

With Obama, they blame the public for all the bad news (“not yet willing to open our wallets to stimulate the economy”) and put it on the business page.

DaydreamBeliever on January 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM

I’m unexpectedly shocked at this report.

katy on January 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM

When you live in a haze of Hopenchange fantasy, reality is always unexpected.

OhioCoastie on January 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM

Hence the growing talk of a double-dip recession.

Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Guess the One hasn’t made his pivot yet. Wait til he turns his gaze to unemployment, right after fixing Haiti and bringing us all together and a few more rounds of golf and some hoops, all will be well in oz.

Kissmygrits on January 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Actually, the AP writers are starting to get the idea. They have pivoted, and are now migrating to more than expected.

singlemalt_18 on January 14, 2010 at 9:36 AM

Yeah right, like I’m going to believe facts and figures over the esteemed opinion of Romer. What do you take me for?

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:36 AM

OK so let me get this straight. According to the Obama administration we are out of the recession because we initially reported postivie GDP grown in the last three (or four depending on who you listen to) quarters.

But, all of those numbers have been revised downward giving us negative growth in all those quarters when you take out the Porkulus effect, which means we are still in a recession/depression.

So which is it?

Johnnyreb on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

If only Congress would pass Obamacare, then everything would be rosy and swell. Obama has said so.

Beaglemom on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

Last week I posted that friends were having trouble getting through to the unemployment offices in their states in order to initiate their UE claims. Three days on the phone! Redial! Redial! Redial all day long. I spoke with one of them last night (in RI) and he says he finally got through Tuesday (after a week) only to have them tell him that they were only handling A-L and that he would have to call back on Wednesday. Well, you guessed it! He couldn’t get through all day yesterday and now will miss this week’s submission cut-off and will roll onto next week.

A suppression of statistics: you betcha.

singer on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

Yeah right, like I’m going to believe facts and figures over the esteemed opinion of Romer. What do you take me for?

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:36 AM

You must be one of the lucky 2 million that has a stimulus-funded job.

Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

But, but…the recession is over!

But, but…Christmas sales were higher than last year!

But, but…green shoots!

But, but…he saved or created two million jobs!

Thunderstorm129 on January 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Well, thank Gaia that Obama saved 100 million jobs, or else we’d all be in trouble………….

/sarc

Techie on January 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Who didn’t expect it?? Who can afford to hire?

And here in El Paso, they want to increase the cost of natural gas, electricity AND raise property taxes. Though, the little town I’m in voted down the property tax increase (much to the chagrin of the schools). My daughter has been turning in applications around the area every week for since we’ve been here (July ’09) and has only gotten one call which ended when she told them she did not speak Spanish.

The economy is sucking and the government just keeps making things more expensive.

cibolo on January 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM

I wondered how long it would take you to post this. Drudge has it up as an AP Yahoo article. They may not say unexpectedly on the jobless claims, but they do say the rise was “more than expected.”

They are trying their best to not sound like a broken record, that’s why they changed it.

MobileVideoEngineer on January 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM

OMG, RLY?

But, but, we MUST be in a recovery! There’s all that money being spent on the stimulus and now that everyone will have healthcare, there will surely be an incentive for employers to hire more and…. Ohhhhh, right.

Exit Question: What sort of desperate measures will Obama take when 2011 hits and he’s got no new jobs to show for his entire presidency?

My guess: Big Repub 2010 wins will be his get-out-of-jail-free card, because he can just blame them. It’s worked for him so far (blaming BOOSH).

Animator Girl on January 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM

Yeah, but Obama will just create 2 million more jobs in December.

No worries.

Darksean on January 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM

Are we on the precipice yet? I can’t wait, sounds so exciting. What’s a precipice?

Geochelone on January 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM

Still waiting on an explanation from the administration on how their ‘Stimulus’ created two million new jobs, but didn’t do a damn thing to ‘save or create’ the over three million (or is it four million) jobs lost over the last year.

catmman on January 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM

Time for the feel good job loss v. previous recesions graph.

We need to cancel the Bush\Cheney tax cuts and all will be well (insert $1.99 sarcasm symbol here).

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM

You must be one of the lucky 2 million that has a stimulus-funded job.
Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

Of course. I’m now a unionized federal employee whose sole duty during my four day work week is to study the effect of solar panel power generation during darkness.

Now if you’ll excuse me, my hour break starts in ten minutes and I need to begin my pre-break break.

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Imagine how bad things would be if the recession wasn’t over.

LibTired on January 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM

It’s getting a little scary here without being able to do much with the savings. I think once I return to The States, I’m going to look for a big chunk of land to invest the savings in before the dollar loses it’s value completely.

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Shucks, I beat Ed to the punch on this topic and requested the Redhead and still didn’t get her. :)
`
If it wasn’t for the Porkulus spending that increased the GDP, how much longer would we have to go before this is declared a depression?

CBP on January 14, 2010 at 9:43 AM

Step down, Obama. Take your angry wife and go back to Hawaii and stay on a permanent vacation, and leave our nation alone.

Key West Reader on January 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM

So which is it?

Johnnyreb on January 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM

Simple. We are both in a recession and governed by shameless liars.

jwolf on January 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM

we’re not in recovery. We’re not even close to recovery yet.

I never believed any of the recovery talk. I don’t know anyone who believed it. Since the meltdown, virtually no one believes any institutional pronunciamentoes from any source. I’ve been wondering when and how we’ll begin to deal with this complete loss of credibility.

Bugler on January 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM

Unemployment claims, foreclosures “unexpectedly” rise again

When does this give way to “Expectedly” ?

jake-the-goose on January 14, 2010 at 9:45 AM

“Unexpectedly”?

Here…let me give you experts a hint.

High, or rising, unemployment leads to competition in the labor market. EXPECT lower incomes. EXPECT more foreclosures.

Dolts.

Saltysam on January 14, 2010 at 9:46 AM

Yeah right, like I’m going to believe facts and figures over the esteemed opinion of Romer. What do you take me for?

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:36 AM

Heh. Pretty good new take on the old “me or your lyin’ eyes” quote.

jwolf on January 14, 2010 at 9:46 AM

How can we be in a recovery if foreclosures rose 14%? I find that number stunning even as I know that even that number is not real.
I don’t know if I can take 3 more years of this total bs.

ORconservative on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

clearly the direction of economic policy in 2009 has even the analysts scratching their heads

Economic policies designed to weaken the U.S., so there’s no choice but to turn to socalism to help the “we used to wealthy, but now were poor” folks out……

Never let a crisis go to waste…..and if there’s none, then hey, just create one !!

Jerome Horwitz on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM

You could open a little shop on the outskirts of some Obamaville somewhere, sell kabobs and naan to the hungry hobos. Just get the bread bubbles right, it’s not the same without the proper amount of bubbles.

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

These numbers, along with December’s employment numbers, show that we’re not in recovery. We’re not even close to recovery yet.

Of course we are! The President said so.

Seriously, I think I’m going to pass on the SOTU which will clearly be nothing but lies, Bush-bashing, and reminders that we should all be happy that we picked the light-skinned negro instead of the grumpy old war hero.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

In fact, those numbers would have been higher had some of the recipients of TARP funds not agreed to moratoriums on foreclosures. BofA, Citibank, and Fannie Mae all postponed actions on foreclosures in the fourth quarter of last year. That won’t keep homes out of foreclosure, however; it will just delay the inevitable for people who can’t afford their house payments.

According to Dr Housing Bubble, things are much worse than expected in some of the largest, worst hit markets.

singlemalt_18 on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

and the history of recessions would indicate that growth would have started occurring by now.

The USA has only responded to a deep recession with socialism once before, and that one lasted 8 more years.

forest on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

The Ministry of Plenty (in Newspeak, Miniplenty) is one of the ministries from George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four that governs Oceania. The other ministries are the Ministry of Truth, the Ministry of Peace and the Ministry of Love.[1]

The Ministry of Plenty is in control of Oceania’s planned economy. It oversees public access to food, supplies, and goods. It is also in charge of rationing these goods. As told in Goldstein’s book, the economy of Oceania is very important, and it’s necessary to have the public continually create useless and synthetic supplies or weapons for use in the war, while they have no access to the means of production. This is the central theme of Oceania’s idea that a poor, weak populace is easier to rule over than a wealthy, powerful populace. Telescreens often make reports on how Big Brother has been able to increase economic productivity, even when productivity has actually gone down (see Ministry of Truth).

The Ministry hands out statistics which are “nonsense”. When Winston is adjusting some Ministry of Plenty’s figures, he explains this:

But actually, he thought as he readjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connection with anything in the real world, not even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great deal of time you were expected to make them up out of your head.

ted c on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

I need Bush

tomas on January 14, 2010 at 9:48 AM

Still waiting on an explanation from the administration on how their ‘Stimulus’ created two million new jobs…
catmman on January 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM

Receiving unemployment checks is now considered a job by this administration.

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Let me get this straight:

The females of the liberal species stop menstruating, they gain weight, they have strange cravings, they have extreme cramps…and unexpectedly a baby is born?!?

AubieJon on January 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Receiving unemployment checks is now considered a job by this administration.

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM

It’s sooooo…French, isn’t it.

AubieJon on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

I need Bush

Dude, this is a political blog, not a dating service….

Jerome Horwitz on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Ah, you’ve been here.

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Sales at U.S. retailers unexpectedly fell in December as consumer spent less on vehicles

Does that mean auto sales? Cash for Clunkers strikes again.

mankai on January 14, 2010 at 9:51 AM

Let me get this straight:

The females of the liberal species stop menstruating, they gain weight, they have strange cravings, they have extreme cramps…and unexpectedly a baby is born?!?

AubieJon on January 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Or it’s unexpectedly aborted.

MobileVideoEngineer on January 14, 2010 at 9:51 AM

The USA has only responded to a deep recession with socialism once before, and that one lasted 8 more years.

forest on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

We did NOT spend enough money in the 30′s and we are not spending enough now. You conservatives only skim the surface of events and NEVER look at the details. You can just kiss my Nobel Peace Prize!

Paul_Krugman on January 14, 2010 at 9:51 AM

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM

Sorry fellas, but we haven’t even started this depression. Wait about 5 years and you’ll know what I’m talking about.
Civil war, starvation, disease and more Simon Cowell.

TheSitRep on January 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM

Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales gaining 0.5 percent last month.

Analysts suck.

mankai on January 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM

According to Dr Housing Bubble, things are much worse than expected in some of the largest, worst hit markets.

singlemalt_18 on January 14, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Apparently commercial foreclosures are not far behind. But let’s not let the facts get in the way of the “happy days are here again” propaganda.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 9:53 AM

It’s sooooo…French, isn’t it.

AubieJon on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Maybe some more “Frenchness” to come our way:

A commission appointed by French President Nicolas Sarkozy suggests heavily weighting “stability” indicators such as “security” and “equality” when calculating GDP. And voilà!—France outperforms the U.S., despite the fact that its per capita income is 30% lower. Nobel laureate Ed Prescott called this disparity the difference between “prosperity and depression” in a 2002 paper—and attributed it entirely to France’s higher taxes.

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 9:55 AM

I need Bush

Dude, this is a political blog, not a dating service….

Jerome Horwitz on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Too funny!

winston on January 14, 2010 at 9:55 AM

In their defense, they’ve been listening to the Obama administration spin numbers all year long

that was their first mistake…

cmsinaz on January 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM

I’m going to look for a big chunk of land to invest the savings in before the dollar loses it’s value completely.

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Make sure it’s big enough to raise beef and grow veggies yet small enough to intall a defensible perimeter fence.

thomasaur on January 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM

Ed, dont forget to add that retail sales in December DROPPED -3% (as expected by those of us living in the Real World)

ginaswo on January 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM

Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales gaining 0.5 percent last month.

Analysts suck.

mankai on January 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM

That’s what happens when you believe Christina Romer.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM

In other news, Obowmao administration scientists have announced a new finding “water unexpectedly ‘wet’”.

rbj on January 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM

How ironic is it that those who are being paid to analyze the economy are constantly surprised by the numbers, and those of us who do it for free are not?

Vashta.Nerada on January 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM

Ah, you’ve been here.
hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 9:50 AM

Not there no, I had the pleasure of visiting a neighboring armpit, the beautiful garden spot known as Karachi, Pakistan.

Ate many a naan wrapped around lamb kebabs though the highlight of my visit was being told my the Shore Patrol to hightail it back to the ship because some western tourists got themselves slaughtered on a bus by terrorists that day, and we might be next. Lovely place.

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Well things are going to turn around now. Take a look at this from NRO. I’m glad our administration is moving in the right direction.
`

Banks, Disparate Impact, and the Financial Meltdown [Roger Clegg]

The New York Times reports that the U.S. Justice Department “is beginning a major campaign against banks and mortgage brokers suspected of discriminating against minority applicants in lending.”

It will be announced today by Tom Perez, head of the department’s civil-rights division, at Jesse Jackson’s annual “Wall Street Project” conference. The initiative apparently will use the “disparate impact” approach, meaning that the banking practices will not be alleged to discriminate in their terms, intent, or application, but just to lead to racially disproportionate results. And, as the Times notes, “Some critics have contended that government rules pushing banks to lend to minority and low-income borrowers contributed to the financial meltdown. The campaign could rekindle that debate.” The Justice Department, it is reported, will be targeting subprime mortgages, but is also looking at “loan modifications for people seeking to avoid foreclosures” to see if there has been a “disparate impact on minorities.”

CBP on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Wall street is clinging to their stocks, the last bastion of hope for the economy…how long can the stocks be propped up?
As unemployment increases, spending decreases, eventually companies will begin to actually understand that their future is limited.
It will be a time, if this administration does not take this economy serious, that the stock market will not be able to carry the burden of debt.
Obama and his cronies have to begin thinking that the nation is more important then their own interests…but they won’t.
Anyone who thinks the “end is in sight” doesn’t have a grasp of the depth of economic downturn.
The only thing keeping the economy from completely blowing up, is that many of the baby boomers have started to retire. They do have retirement incomes, and their jobs had to be replaced…but that is only for another couple of years, then that stat begins to slow, less will retire.
It is such simple math, that is what is frustrating…they make it complicated, but it is simple.
Less employees, less money to purchase, less money saved….less purchasing means less production, and less money saved means less to loan. And loans isn’t a one to one ratio.
Right now there is only two things really important to America (economically) unemployment, and building up our manufacturing and production….everything else will fall into place.
But….they won’t talk to the Chamber and others that are tapped into what they so need…really, I don’t see anywhere out of this with Obama at the helm, he doesn’t understand. Or even worse, he understands and he is doing this on purpose…a thought I wouldn’t have accepted until these past few weeks.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Please donate to Scott Brown. Let’s take back MassachusettEs.

OmahaConservative on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Unexpectedly unexpected!

Foreclosures jumped 14 percent in December 2009 from the previous month, according to a new report from foreclosure listing Web site RealtyTrac.com. …

Anecdotal observation:

In my hometown paper (Richmond Times-Dispatch)the number of foreclosure “trustee sales” notices have been rising for months. On some days, there will be 4 or 5 entire pages of them in the classifieds section. All zip codes, rich and poor.

It ain’t over yet.

BacaDog on January 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM

Wow — the rise of the oceans has ceased, the planet has begun to heal, the whole world loves us again, the economy is booming, I don’t have to pay for gas or my mortgage, the terrorists just want to sit down and have tea with us; I mean, there’s just so much Hope and Change everywhere that I feel like I’m going to throw up…

Dopenstrange on January 14, 2010 at 10:01 AM

I’m unexpectedly shocked.

angryed on January 14, 2010 at 10:01 AM

The New York Times reports that the U.S. Justice Department “is beginning a major campaign against banks and mortgage brokers suspected of discriminating against minority applicants in lending.”
CBP on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

shocka!
holder’s priorities are a little skewed to say the least

cmsinaz on January 14, 2010 at 10:02 AM

Civil war, starvation, disease and more Simon Cowell.
TheSitRep on January 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM

No big dea….wait, did you say more Simon Cowell? Dear GAWD!

*aaaahhhhhhhhh*

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 10:02 AM

A year later hundreds of billions spent, unaccounted for, and universal acceptance that the stimulus failed. Incoming numbers show the last year has no long term effect for improvement in the economy. The worst part is this administration doen’t have a clue what to do. Reality to a liberal is not what it is, but what they want it to be. They just don’t know how to do anything, but know what they want it to be.

volsense on January 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM

How ironic is it that those who are being paid to analyze the economy are constantly surprised by the numbers, and those of us who do it for free are not?

Vashta.Nerada on January 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM

The difference is that they are being paid to be constantly surprised. If they are true economists, they know that everything the administration is doing is destroying the economy.

MobileVideoEngineer on January 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Report: Sun unexpectedly rises in the east. Water still wet. Sky still blue.

BigWyo on January 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Princess bride reference.

You keep using that word “unexpectedly”, i do not think it means what you think it means.

sonofdy on January 14, 2010 at 10:04 AM

The big banks have been postponing foreclosures for months, like 6 months or more. The foreclosures being reported now are from last spring.
These numbers are so misleading it is impossible to predict any of the fallout.
The damn unicorn administration has given us nothing but smoke and mirrors. The only thing truly unexpected is that we have not come to a complete standstill.

ORconservative on January 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM

sonofdy on January 14, 2010 at 10:04 AM

a little carol kane
‘liar!’

cmsinaz on January 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM

all we need to learn about life we can learn from the Princess Bride…

“inconthievable”

ted c on January 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM

When one learns nothing from the past, everything comes as a surprise.

Track-A-'Crat on January 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM

How ironic is it that those who are being paid to analyze the economy are constantly surprised by the numbers, and those of us who do it for free are not?

Vashta.Nerada on January 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM

Excellent point.

Bugler on January 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM

The Socialists are working their usual magic on what was fka the world’s greatest economy. Dope and Chains, baby!

james23 on January 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM

Princess bride reference.

You keep using that word “unexpectedly”, i do not think it means what you think it means.

sonofdy on January 14, 2010 at 10:04 AM

Here are a few more:

Life is pain. Anyone who tells you otherwise works for the Obama Administration.

Have fun fixing the economy.
Think it’ll work?
It would take a miracle.
Buh-bye!

Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM

Montoya: “But Mr. President, your programs are in fact not helping, but harming the country – can we expect you to stop? Please, I must know…”

The Dread Pirate Barack: “Get used to disappointment.”

Midas on January 14, 2010 at 10:10 AM

dante’s inferno

rjoco1 on January 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM

weaker than expected

Is that a new way to say “unexpected”?

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM

Bishop on January 14, 2010 at 9:59 AM

There’s a place on Kandahar’s Boardwalk that sells Kebabs and Naan. Great food. Can’t eat the lamb though. At any rate, I figured from some of your posts, you had see a bit of this part of the world.

Can you guys tell me though, how bad is it looking back there in as far as the dollar losing it’s value? I’ve got pretty hefty savings, but that’s really all I have right now. Like I said, it’s sounding a little scary without some kind of diversification.

(Maybe I should buy a farm and let Simple Simon, Jimbo 3, Bleeds Blue Crr6 Norman Blitzer work there for what they owe us for their health care)

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM

..is this unexpectedly unprecedented?

VoyskaPVO on January 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM

Dopenstrange on January 14, 2010 at 10:01 AM

Personally, I’m looking forward to next Wednesday. Hopefully it will see a Scott Brown victory but more importantly it will be the one year anniversary for the era of bad stewardship. Remember all the hype? How Obama was going to fix everything in six months? Any of that euphoria still around? I want to see the juxtaposition of the idiotic hype from that day with the grim reality of one year of rampant unchecked radical socialism!

Of course, the state run media will portray it as Obama being such a dreamer his lofty goals were impossible to meet but he’s doing a really good job with what he has to work with after the evil Bush regime destroyed his chances of fulfilling those dreams.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM

How can I tell if Obooba saved my job?

Akzed on January 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM

(Maybe I should buy a farm and let Simple Simon, Jimbo 3, Bleeds Blue Crr6 Norman Blitzer work there for what they owe us for their health care)

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM

You wouldn’t get the equivalent of even one person’s work out of that lot combined.

Midas on January 14, 2010 at 10:14 AM

Hence the growing talk of a double-dip recession.

Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Don’t you need some actual, upward momentum before you can double dip?

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM

How can I tell if Obooba saved my job?

Akzed on January 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM

If you still have one, they’ll take credit for it.

Midas on January 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM

Why is it that we hear more from the messiah on Haiti than anything in this country?

ORconservative on January 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM

“It has done exactly what we have anticipated it would do.”
–Romer, on the Stimulus

I think, there’s a lot of truth to that statement.

I mean, after all, isn’t this what “Social and Economic Justice” is all about?

franksalterego on January 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM

which ended when she told them she did not speak Spanish.

I have a number of relatives who routinely cross the border into El Paso in order to do some shopping. More goods, better quality, and usually cheaper.

It’s understandable that employers in that area would prefer workers who could speak spanish.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM

Of course, the state run media will portray it as Obama being such a dreamer his lofty goals were impossible to meet but he’s doing a really good job with what he has to work with after the evil Bush regime destroyed his chances of fulfilling those dreams.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM

aka chrissy’s townhall mtg…

cmsinaz on January 14, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Why is it that we hear more from the messiah on Haiti than anything in this country?

ORconservative on January 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM

We could use dave742′s line of, it’s all a political stunt/ploy to make himself look better. Plus he knows that he can’t really mess this one up.

MobileVideoEngineer on January 14, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Taxes went up on Jan 1, as the withholding tables were adjusted to account for the expiring of the Bush tax cuts.

Won’t take long for that hit to start affecting the economy.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 10:20 AM

How can I tell if Obooba saved my job?

Akzed on January 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM

If you still have one, they’ll take credit for it.

Midas on January 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM

Well, I absolutely can attest to the fact that the man saved my job.

hawkdriver on January 14, 2010 at 10:20 AM

Comment pages: 1 2