Suffolk poll: Brown 50, Coakley 46
posted at 10:20 pm on January 14, 2010 by Allahpundit
Although Brown’s 4-point lead over Democrat Martha Coakley is within the Suffolk University/7News survey’s margin of error, the underdog’s position at the top of the results stunned even pollster David Paleologos.
“It’s a Brown-out,” said Paleologos, director of Suffolk’s Political Research Center. “It’s a massive change in the political landscape.”…
Paleologos said bellweather models show high numbers of independent voters turning out on election day, which benefits Brown, who has 65 percent of that bloc compared to Coakley’s 30 percent. Kennedy earns just 3 percent of the independent vote, and 1 percent are undecided…
Yet even in the bluest state, it appears Kennedy’s quest for universal health care has fallen out of favor, with 51 percent of voters saying they oppose the “national near-universal health-care package” and 61 percent saying they believe the government cannot afford to pay for it.
The difference in favorables is enormous. Coakley? 49/41. Brown? 57/19. Even worse for Coakley, 64 percent of voters think she’ll win — precisely the sort of complacency that has Dems terrified about turnout.
AP pessimism meter check: 1.0, down from 1.5 earlier today, indicating likely chances of a long night of ballot-counting that ends in razor-thin, tear-stained defeat.
Update: Just noticed upon re-reading that Suffolk has the same number of Dems crossing for Brown as PPP did last weekend — 17 percent, a shocking amount. Also shocking:
The poll surveyed a carefully partitioned electorate meant to match voter turnout: 39 percent Democrat, 15 percent Republican and 45 percent unenrolled.
The Democratic sample is +24 — and Scott Brown still leads?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Now would be a good time to donate!
orfannkyl on January 15, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Massachusetts to the rescue baby! Baaaaston, Home of the Revolution!
exdeadhead on January 15, 2010 at 12:17 AM
JeffWeimer on January 14, 2010 at 11:35 PM
didn’t say they were becoming conservative just that they were going anti-blue. Purple.
unseen on January 15, 2010 at 12:19 AM
Can’t wait til Teusday night.
THE CHOSEN ONE on January 15, 2010 at 12:21 AM
This is the first non presidential election I have ever contributed to. I couldn’t send much but I feel this election’s implications are far to vast to not give some assistance. Make us proud camp Brown!
JSK on January 15, 2010 at 12:28 AM
Gregoire reminds me of the fictional WA governor in the David Spade/ Chris Farley movie Black Sheep.
silverfox on January 15, 2010 at 12:30 AM
Also, Brown won the debate, accd to this poll, by a 16 point margin
Against the backdrop of an election that could possibly play a decisive role in the health care debate—a point both parties have begun to press on their supporters—51 percent said they did not support the health care bill, with 36 percent supported it. Sixty-one percent said they didn’t believe the government could afford such a plan.
A plurality of respondents also believe Brown fared better during the televised debates between the candidates, with 41 percent saying they believed Brown won, compared to just 25 percent for Coakley.
The survey was conducted Jan. 11-13 and surveyed 500 registered voters, with a margin of error of 4.4 percent.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31534.html#ixzz0ceixEiNF
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on January 15, 2010 at 12:30 AM
My vote has already been cast absentee last week so he has at least one already.
I’m SO ready for a win.
I want freedom to ring again.
(btw, I asked my son who is antiestablishment and always votes against mine for the sake of creating chaos, to vote for Scott if he hasn’t given it much thought. He said he would just because of the ruckus it would cause if he wins. My other son is squarely in Scott’s corner. This is the first election we have all been on the same page even if for different reasons. This too gives me hope)
Miss Molly on January 15, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Wow, I thought I couldn’t see a worse ran campaign than McCain’s and a Liberal Democrat from Massachusetts runs a campaign so crappy she might hand over Teddy’s seat to a Republican.
Holger on January 15, 2010 at 12:33 AM
Schadenfreude on January 15, 2010 at 12:34 AM
Mr. Steele,
Inquiring minds want to know….
Are you taking notes or preparing your resignation?
Great candidate, great campaign.
Keep the cameras rolling on ACORN. Maybe this time they will finally get caught with their hands in cookie jar. (A guy can dream can’t he?!)
hoakie on January 15, 2010 at 12:34 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yu_af4KbdE&feature=player_embedded
CK MacLeod on January 15, 2010 at 12:35 AM
FWIW,
I’m unemployed, but still gave a symbolic $17.76.
hoakie on January 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM
Man, I could make a killing with a ‘clean underwear’ kiosks outside various political HQ’s next week.
I’d clean up, no matter what the results are.
CPT. Charles on January 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM
“It’s not Kennedy’s seat. It’s the people’s seat”
~~Scott Brown
Schadenfreude on January 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM
Yeah, Baby!
2ipa on January 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM
It will be worth a lot. Thanks for donating and for sharing, and may you find work soon.
Schadenfreude on January 15, 2010 at 12:42 AM
I’ve thought that more than a few times. That first election was, well, interesting.
4k78 on January 15, 2010 at 12:44 AM
I don’t think they’ve gone purple permanently, and for the reasons I stated. It’s still a deep blue state.
Now, if he turns out to be a good Senator (and all indications so far are hopeful) and wins reelection (very important), he may be foot in the door we need to start electing more Republicans in MA.
JeffWeimer on January 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM
The fact that such a weak candidate as Kookley is polling so high means that half the state will still vote for absolutely anyone with a D after their name.
pedestrian on January 15, 2010 at 12:50 AM
If Scott wins this thing, I think that will be all she wrote for Obama’s agenda for the foreseeable future. Cuz I don’t think he’ll just be the 41st “no” vote. I think there are a lot of Blue Dogs with a proverbial gun to their heads voting the party line when they know perfectly well it’s a suicide mission for them. I mean I think even those who have been bribed with all sorts of favors and goodies might suddenly find a conscience again with Scott there to give them cover. Once the dominoes start falling, it’s all over but the crying.
I don’t think it’s overstating things to say the future of this country rests with this one election. NY-23 was an important race, and it sent a message, laying the foundation for what’s to come this year, but the outcome wouldn’t have made a difference when the votes are taken. Nancy has a couple more putzes she can count on to vote her way. But this race is the lynch pin. I have no doubt the Chicago boys will stop at nothing to steal this thing. ACORN, SEIU, dead people, Black Panthers — all will be out in full force on Tuesday. Fortunately, tho, all eyes are on this race even more so than they were NY-23 (for several reasons) and we’re prepared for the shenanigans they’re going to try to pull. Scott is prepared for them; dude is a lawyer, he’s not to be messed with. Let them try that bullshyte out in the open where everyone is watching them and see if it’s so easy to get by with it.
NoLeftTurn on January 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM
For a while (okay, two minutes) I believed that blue dogs were really fiscally conservative until I witnessed the health care sausage fest.
What could Reid/Pelosi do to them (“proverbial gun to their heads”) that their feverishly angry constituents couldn’t do better (i.e. vote the spineless yellow dogs out of office)?
Mark Boabaca on January 15, 2010 at 12:57 AM
Who is this Brown guy? I am sending him money, although over 3,000 miles away.
betsyz on January 15, 2010 at 1:02 AM
Brown doesn’t have to win in order for us to have a reason son to celebrate. But if he does pull it off, it will be icing on the cake.
OTOH, win lose or draw the Democrats will be sh!ttng bricks come Tues night.
ConservativeTony on January 15, 2010 at 1:05 AM
I assume it’s all about the money. Threatening to withhold money and support for their re-election bids, threatening to back other candidates in the primary. Promising in return lots of cash and goodies for their yes votes and convincing them that bringing home some pork will buy them some votes (and unfortunately this tactic has worked in the past).
Two of these Blue Dogs are mine. Compared with the spend-happy Northern liberals, they have been fairly fiscally conservative — until Obama and his thugs showed up. I think some of them would like an excuse to vote no. Not all of them, but some do — esp. those who are up for re-election this year. Lincoln is done in my book regardless but there are some people here who might be persuaded to change their minds if she voted no on this thing ultimately. I don’t think it would be enough to make a difference, but you never know: Stranger things have happened.
NoLeftTurn on January 15, 2010 at 1:10 AM
I want to believe, but who is going to be watching the voting precincts (armed Black Panthers), stuffed ballot boxes, lost ballots, “found” ballots, spoiled ballots that are counted, etc. Those thugs make me nervous. It happened in Minnesota.
Mirimichi on January 15, 2010 at 1:10 AM
Instant Karma gonna get you if Scott Brown won on Tuesday.
Ted pushed to get a bill through the Dem controlled State House in 2004 because he did not want to let Romney appoint a Republican to replace the soon to be President Kerry. Instead there has to be a special election. So if Brown wins the special election and becomes the 41st vote to stop Barry, Harry and Nanny running roughshod over the country and jamming the radical agenda down Americans throat, it would be sweet justice and unintended consequence for Dead Ted’s shameless manipulation of fundamental process.
bayview on January 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM
HUGE story just went up at washingtonopost.com! Cites this poll and totally trashes Coakley’s campaign. I think Dems are close to throwing in the towel on this one. Why else would the White House be talking about round the clock work on the health care disaster? they are going tio try to shove it through before Brown is seated.
rockmom on January 15, 2010 at 1:16 AM
Don;t think for a moment that Coakley can’t win this race.
GET OUT THE VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Saltysam on January 15, 2010 at 1:28 AM
Golly, it appears The Won doesn’t think it will be a fair fight if its only 59-41.
ConservativeTony on January 15, 2010 at 1:32 AM
From the comments section of the Washingtonpost article:
Mark Boabaca on January 15, 2010 at 1:37 AM
The only things they say about Brown is that he is an obscure state senator, a former model, and did well in the debate.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/14/AR2010011404607.html?nav=hcmodule
Fine. The less attention they draw to national Democrats the better.
pedestrian on January 15, 2010 at 1:39 AM
Of course she can win, she went on a three week vacation in Dec/Jan. That is also known as cocksure. Look, take peace in the fact that we have turned it into a race; take hope that we can actually win it.
Take courage in that if you were the only one to vote for a person, and that your conviction compelled you to do so, that your vote was not wasted. Be not a sheep, but a shepherd.
GnuBreed on January 15, 2010 at 1:40 AM
I gave for the second time tonight and plan to work the phones for Scott too.
Please, please win this for America, my kids and grandkids Mass.!
Omaha, NE
RVN 1966-1967
vietvet on January 15, 2010 at 1:42 AM
Wow that is MASSIVE if honest….I’ve stocked up on extra liquor and popcorn just in case.
GnuBreed on January 15, 2010 at 1:45 AM
I’ll just do a Samuel Adams to celebrate.
bayview on January 15, 2010 at 1:48 AM
Ooohhhh.
That female vote must really be rocking the donkeys boat.
Saltysam on January 15, 2010 at 1:57 AM
Honestly, how much do YOU know about Scott Brown? He IS an obscure state Senator. That is the whole POINT — an obscure State Senator is beating the establishment Democrat in a race for Ted Kennedy’s seat!
What I read between the lines of this article is “I can’t believe our gal is losing to this guy!”
rockmom on January 15, 2010 at 1:59 AM
FIFY
GnuBreed on January 15, 2010 at 2:00 AM
“The word I hear most is ‘disgusted,’ ” said Fred DeFinis, 58, who has worked the phones for the past two weeks. Seven to eight of every 10 independents tell him that they will vote for Brown, he said, proportions similar to those seen in some public opinion surveys.
“It’s very hard for them to say what’s on their minds,” said DeFinis, a registered Democrat. He reads from a form asking whether they are most concerned about: (1) jobs and the economy; (2) the health-care bill; (3) illegal immigrants; or (4) national security. ” ‘All of the above’ is what we hear the most,” he said.
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on January 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM
OK, I’ll ask. Why the long face, John?
singer on January 15, 2010 at 2:02 AM
Just like us wanting to vote ‘all of the above’ on the OOTW polls each week. “You mean I hafta pick ONE?”
GnuBreed on January 15, 2010 at 2:05 AM
If the worst that the Democrat opposition research can come up with is that he owns a few very small investment properties, then he is fine for me. He is pro-choice, but given his opponents that is not a factor in this election. I used to live just outside his state senate district, so I didn’t follow him that closely, but I never heard anything bad about him.
I haven’t heard any great legislative accomplishments from him, but Republicans in Massachusetts have zero hope of getting anything passed of any interest.
Still the article might have mentioned his 30 years National Guard service as JAG rather than a picture that was once taken of him.
pedestrian on January 15, 2010 at 2:16 AM
http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2010/01/14/massachusetts-shocker-brown-up-15-in-pajamas-mediacrosstarget-poll/
the POLL IS REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Massachusetts shocker: Brown Up 15% in Pajamas Media/CrossTarget Poll
A new poll conducted for Pajamas Media by CrossTarget – an Alexandria VA survey research firm – shows Scott Brown, a Republican, leading Martha Coakley, a Democrat, by 15.4% in Tuesday’s special election for the open Massachusetts US Senate seat. The poll of 946 likely voters was conducted by telephone using interactive voice technology (IVR) and has a margin of error of +/- 3.19%.
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on January 15, 2010 at 2:23 AM
There’s a limit to how far the Dems can push the Blue Dogs in that direction. If they push too far, the Republicans could move in and persuade them that things would be better on the other side of the street.
PackerBronco on January 15, 2010 at 2:24 AM
Here is where it began. Doctor Zero Has been prescient to a remarkable degree in this respect,
It may not be time to break out the champagne, but ordering some extra would certainly be prudent.
davo on January 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM
That’s statement’s been in my head since Nov 2008.
I’m glad to see that at least I won’t have the sore eyes when it’s over… or at least there’s a good chance of it.
Because of you I’m sending another $20.10 to the Scott Brown campaign.
Chaz706 on January 15, 2010 at 2:38 AM
Link stealer!
;)
Enoxo on January 15, 2010 at 2:38 AM
I screwed up the link
Fixed.
davo on January 15, 2010 at 2:45 AM
You are right. Even Roger reiterated it. OMG! (I seldom say this, even in non-polite company) Tuesday can probably send a 10.7 political earthquake!
Chew on this, guys. I just did a little digging at The Political Graveyard for the chronology of U.S. Senators from MA in the 20th century. After doing a little back-counting, I noticed that this seat being contested has been in possession, not just of a Democrat, but of a Kennedy, since 1953. Nineteen fifty-three! NINETEEN FIFTY THREE!
After fifty-seven years, the “Kennedy Seat” will be no more. And the probable winner will be a Republican who has zero blood or ideological connection to that clan. Think about it: if Brown wins, the Kennedy hegemony shall be no more, after… how many, seventy, eighty years? A clan is dissolving into the rest of society before our very eyes, just as the Rockefeller descendants have since the eighties. And I’m probably sure that the Kennedys picked Coakley because they thought she would “keep the seat warm” while another member of the clan was to be groomed to take over it once again. And the best laid plans of mice and men…
Democrats better know how to administer CPR. They’re going to need it!
newton on January 15, 2010 at 3:05 AM
STOP..JINXING…THIS!
btw… does anyone here doubt that if CAROLINE KENNEDY had been selected here to run or propped up by the Dems back when they had primary season this would even be a race?
theoneandonlyfinn on January 15, 2010 at 3:07 AM
A complete blow-out like that would be amazing, but it is a big problem too because the Libertarians will drift back to Kennedy, and support may soften.
Massachusetts voters are fiscally conservative, except when they think they are going to get the money. So they vote for Democrats to bring home the bacon, but vote down tax increases. In this case they already have a health plan, and are in no mood to pay for Nebraska’s or Florida’s health plans.
pedestrian on January 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM
The good news is it is too late, even by Democrat standards, to substitute another candidate.
pedestrian on January 15, 2010 at 3:11 AM
Piss off Mass. sports fans – check
Piss off Mass. Catholics – checkity-check
Weight of Glory on January 14, 2010 at 10:25 PM
You forgot about pissing off journalist by having thugs push them around :)
maggieo on January 15, 2010 at 3:25 AM
Yeah, when she took a dump on Red Sox Nation, that cost her almost as many votes as her coddling of that child molesting priest.
Bruce in NH on January 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Even though I am a Catholic and normally get very irritated when people mention these child molester priests, in this case it is an exception. The fact is the guy was guilty and he was caught, she let him off with plea bargaining, and he was free to do it again. So yes…. she does not get a pass.
However, do not forget her record in other cases – the child care case where her boss was responsible for putting innocent people in prison, but she comes into the case because when the parole board sought clemency from the outgoing governor, it was Coakley who fought against it, despite the overwhelming evidence of his innocence. Then there is the Louise Woodward case, the English nanny who was charged with the murder of a baby with what was alleged to be shaken baby syndrome, except that she was innocent of any wrong-doing. The baby had an old head injury. The mother has never told the full story about what happened to the baby before Louise came along as a nanny. Then there is the case where she refused to charge a man over his rape of his 2 year old niece with a curling iron….. This one is more serious than the child molestation case against the priest. All of them add up to a really bad record.
maggieo on January 15, 2010 at 3:45 AM
s this really happening?
I’ve been conditioned for too long to believe that this can be true, so I’m just going to choose an Allah-esque attitude of pessimism and assume that this is still bad news, just an example of Brown peaking early, with it all downhill from here.
Vyce on January 14, 2010 at 10:52 PM
why are you being an eeyore?
It is this kind of pessimism that is really bad. Time to be positive and act positive instead of being a wet blanket.
maggieo on January 15, 2010 at 3:52 AM
Don’t forget Brown has served 30 years in the National Guard, working up to lieutenant colonel. He is also a triathelete–the ultimate alpha male…
He is also pressing about the certification process, and there will be a big brohaha if he is not allowed to be certified. The dems will shoot themselves in the foot if they block his certification…
lovingmyUSA on January 15, 2010 at 4:26 AM
I haven’t seen it used yet, but the slogan ‘Toss Coakley into the sea’ is just begging to be used.
Mr Purple on January 15, 2010 at 5:05 AM
Nah…..they like that. Dems have been doing it for years.
98ZJUSMC on January 15, 2010 at 5:21 AM
heh…..
98ZJUSMC on January 15, 2010 at 5:28 AM
ap you magnificent bastard you. You’ve just made my early morning. if it weren’t 6;00am, I’d crack a beer. thanks for the nuke pic, my stomach dropped when i saw it, but 4 points—can you say nuclearmoneycarpetbomb?
boomstick!
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:10 AM
You’re telling me…every time I watch this guy, my mind wanders – he’s certainly got a lot of appeal.
CarolynM on January 15, 2010 at 6:15 AM
Today the cradle of liberty is rocking. Scott Brown wins–John and Abigail Adams are going to be dancing in the streets with Sam and the rest of the patriots that fell at Massachusetts. I believe that God has a hand in this and there is absolutely no other way. Scott Brown is facing the Goliath of the Democratic machine, and has hurled a rock right at its forehead.
White House Sphincter Pucker Factor: DEFCON 1
Happy Friday, Rahm–you bitch.
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:19 AM
It’s going to be a long few days. Ol’ Ben, n’ Blanche and every other Dem that thinks healthcare reform is the way to go has a few more things to think about now. I can’t see how the nerve can hold up amongst them.
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:21 AM
what an awesome start to the morning!
yeah baby!
cmsinaz on January 15, 2010 at 6:32 AM
I wonder how many additional Mass voters are going to be turned off by the new union healthcare pass they announced this morning- I’m furious about it.
anniekc on January 15, 2010 at 6:37 AM
Isn’t that the truth? When I first saw the headline I misread it thinking that it was Coakley 50% – Brown 46%, Silly me.
It is obviously time for mass consumption of alertness fluid.
Now the polls are starting to catch up with what is being seen on the ground here.
This. Will. Happen.
turfmann on January 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM
and we’re barely gettin’ started yet. This is just gettin’ us warmed up….
*if I were a democrat, I’d start cleaning out my desk…*
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM
troof. got the Stahhhbucks (as they say in Boston) drippin’ through the pot right now. check this, wouldn’t it be cool if Scott Brown, if he won, gave a victory speech in front of the Minuteman Statue in Lexington, MA. It’d be such a visual and symbolic reference to the tea partiers that filled his coffers with cash and a clear historical reference to the revolutionary nature of today’s politics.
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:41 AM
and take one last look outside from your office :-)
cmsinaz on January 15, 2010 at 6:42 AM
Who does this guy look like to you?
This statue stands on the battle line where the Revolutionary War started.
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM
my posts are sluggish in posting. i may be on comment watch today or something. Sorry for whatever I said fellas–*humble*
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:44 AM
With all due respect, it is not Teddy’s seat; it’s the people’s seat.
MikeA on January 15, 2010 at 6:48 AM
Good GAWD! What a wonderful surprise for first thing this morning! Let’ all do as Allah suggested, and moneycarpetbomb Scott Brown today!
And yes, as someone suggested earlier, Michael Steele, are you listening? Can you hear us now?
lukespapa on January 15, 2010 at 6:48 AM
lukespapa on January 15, 2010 at 6:48 AM
nuclearmoneycarpetbomb
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM
This mornings news of the unions getting exempted from the healthcare tax can’t be helpful to Ms. Croakley’s cause.
anniekc on January 15, 2010 at 6:53 AM
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM
YES! I like it! I have already gone to de-caf this morning because I am shaking out of my skin with excitement!
SCOTT.CAN.WIN
lukespapa on January 15, 2010 at 6:56 AM
Did anyone take the BG poll to the right of the article?
The Herald Pulse…Oh My Oh My!…
lol !
jerrytbg on January 15, 2010 at 6:57 AM
The gods are punishing you for what you did to bleedsblue the other day.
/s
(that was you that did that public service, wasn’t it?)
turfmann on January 15, 2010 at 6:58 AM
Like someone said above, this is also the very first non-presidential election campaign I’ve ever donated to. AND it’s not even in my state!
GO BROWN!
Urban Infidel on January 15, 2010 at 7:00 AM
No time to get complacent. I just got my user name and password to “Call From Home.” I will be calling all morning and again Sunday and Monday afternoons. Help if you can. Stakes are high.
doctormom on January 15, 2010 at 7:01 AM
PS: I also read somewhere that the local clerks offices have people lining up out the door to register to vote! :)
Urban Infidel on January 15, 2010 at 7:01 AM
He was utterly beaten before the deed was done. He simply fondled the hand grenade, we simply talked him into pulling the pin and dropping it into his lap.
I sense ed & ap will open reg soon to get us some more scooby snacks to dine on. They really need to get us a higher class of troll. that may be an oxymoron though.
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM
Secretary of State Bill Galvin, who is really a good egg, was on TV last night explaining the law and his responsibilities about certifying elections.
He’s right, of course.
But the Democrats have succeeded in fouling their own nest with their blatant, naked posturing to manipulate the passing of Kennedy such that no Republican could possibly have a fair shot of winning and that no harm would come to the Democrat machine in Washington, most especially to das Obamafuhrer himself.
Niki Tsongas was given her ticket right away when she won her special election.
Should Brown win, he should be accorded the same courtesy.
I think that there will be more than just a few people willing to exercise their right to assemble and their right to petition their government for redress of grievances on this one.
turfmann on January 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM
http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2010/01/14/massachusetts-shocker-brown-up-15-in-pajamas-mediacrosstarget-poll/
Dude! Check this. A pajamas media poll has him up …..FIFTEN PATRIOT POINTS—Holy polly batman
ted c on January 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM
MC’s Campaign.
jerrytbg on January 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM
I wasn’t on line when the deed was done, but someone in a comment mentioned what thread it occurred in and linked to it.
I read the thread for pure entertainment value.
The pommelling that he took was magnificent to behold.
*tip hat*
turfmann on January 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM
it’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood!
cmsinaz on January 15, 2010 at 7:09 AM
turfmann,
Agreed…They made the bed, now let them sleep in it.
jerrytbg on January 15, 2010 at 7:10 AM
Don’t forget the Bower in Chief pissing off the Cambridge cops!
Urban Infidel on January 15, 2010 at 7:13 AM
Nice “HIT” piece on Brown on the the Today Show
NBC never fails to disappoint. It is on par with HuffPos “shocking” hit piece yesterday.
Ed/AP – you need to find this clip and show it.
LordMaximus on January 15, 2010 at 7:25 AM
Nah nah nah, nah nah nah, hey hey hey, goodbye…
WordsMatter on January 15, 2010 at 7:28 AM
Does Ace have skulls up yet?
victor82 on January 15, 2010 at 7:28 AM
From here in New Hampshire, if Brown wins this thing it will energize conservatives all over New England. New Hampshire was a rock-ribbed conservative bastion until about 10-15 years ago when a flood of MA citizens infiltrated NH in an attempt to flee high taxes and growing regulations.
Please, give $$$ to the Brown campaign and pray that the union goons and DemoncRAT machine doesn’t steal another election a la Minnesota.
mountainmanbob on January 15, 2010 at 7:31 AM
Send your idea to tips@hotair.com.
Cindy Munford on January 15, 2010 at 7:34 AM
I’m trying not to get too excited about the polls…they have been wrong before. But, we are very excited about the response Scott has gotten from folks here in MA as well as from all over the country. I’m beginning to feel like we have a real possibility of making a breakthrough right here in the land of the first Tea Party. We had the pleasure of meeting Scott at a GOP fundraiser here in our town last summer where he announced his candidacy, and we immediately signed the petition to get his name on the ballot. When I shook his hand and thanked him for running, he said, “My wife thinks I’m crazy.” He’s a down-to-earth regular guy…we need more of his type in DC to be sure. GO, SCOTT,GO!! If you are able, please send money to his campaign so we can keep the momentum going.
4Freedom on January 15, 2010 at 7:36 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »