Charts of the Day

posted at 11:36 am on January 14, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Courtesy of King Banaian, this presentation comes from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, which has a handy Flash widget that allows users to measure post-World War II recessions against each other by both employment and production.  It’s a handy tool not just for comparing the depth of the recessions, but also the time for the recovery — and pull off some of the spin as well.  The Chart of the Day shows employment figures by months after the start of recessions.  How does the 2007 recession compare?

Only the 1948 recession was close to being worse than the 2007 recession — but it’s worth noting that a year ago, that wasn’t true at all.  In fact, after the first twelve months of the 2007 recession, national employment had only declined about 2.25%, putting this recession in about the middle of the range for post-war recessions.  And the 2007 recession is alone in continuing its decline after the 12-month mark; in all previous post-war recessions (with the exception of the 1980/81 double-dip recession), US employment rebounded by that point.

The production numbers look similar:

We’re not in a recovery, especially not in employment.  Production may have incrementally improved in 2009Q3, but hardly enough to stimulate job creation.  Rep. John Carter uses similar data at Big Government to make the same point.  The economic policies of the Obama administration have lengthened the recession and delayed what would be the normal recovery process, mainly by signaling to investors and businesses that costs will go up in taxes and energy prices, as well as burdensome mandates on health insurance.  As a result, people are not investing their money into job-creating risk but are sheltering their cash instead.

The US needs a change in direction, and fast.  Another Porkulus will give the illusion of action while deepening our debt and creating more need for higher taxes in the future.  We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

How low do these charts go? Can they print them that low?

Cybergeezer on January 14, 2010 at 11:38 AM

Look at all the pretty colors. Who knew crayons had such a variety.

Knucklehead on January 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM

Another Porkulus will give the illusion of action while deepening our debt and creating more need for higher taxes in the future.

It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

Vashta.Nerada on January 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM

The B+ system worked!
What part don’t you get?

Tom_OC on January 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM

Obama’s legacy; Seeking and capturing new lows.

Cybergeezer on January 14, 2010 at 11:40 AM

cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

Not gonna happen with this bunch in DC. The only ones tightening their belts are the American taxpayers. Unfortunately, this falls on deaf ears. They have their ideology and agenda to ram through, dontcha know.

VaGal on January 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM

I don’t think taxes need to be cut, though it would be nice, but the tax cuts of 2003 need to be made permanent.

WashJeff on January 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Unprecedented!

trubble on January 14, 2010 at 11:43 AM

According to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, financial/economics guru at the Daily Telegraph (and proud owner of the most exquisitely English sounding name in creation):

David Rosenberg from Gluskin Sheff said it is remarkable how little traction has been achieved by zero rates and the greatest fiscal blitz of all time. The US economy grew at a 2.2pc rate in the third quarter (entirely due to Obama stimulus). This compares to an average of 7.3pc in the first quarter of every recovery since the Second World War.

7.3% vs. 2.2%, and even that 2.2% is misleading, as “growth” based on a massive fiscal expansion is nothing of the sort.

Track-A-'Crat on January 14, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Look at all the pretty colors. Who knew crayons had such a variety.

Knucklehead on January 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM

Must be an unevolved chick thing because I immediately thought the same thing.

Cindy Munford on January 14, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Looks like that whole “abandon the free market to save the free market” thing didn’t worked out as planned. And leave it to Obama to tank employment just like his own poll numbers.

Wineaholic on January 14, 2010 at 11:43 AM

As it became clear Obama was going to win the election, the floor dropped out of the economy. I remember back then how lefties howled at the idea that productive people and small business owners would “go Galt”, but now it’s clear that’s exactly what happened. Jobs come from small businesses, and the president does nothing but talk about taxing them. He must hate working people.

MTF on January 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM

So what are we suppose to do? I dont think Democrats or Republicans have an answer. Both parties have shown they are more concerned with their personal welfare and staying in power then doing whats best for the people.

offroadaz on January 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Doing the Obama Slide

faraway on January 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM

Lines are racist.

LibTired on January 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM

“The US needs a change in direction, and fast.”

OmahaConservative on January 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM

What recession?

BobMbx on January 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

Not one single element of a fix is even considered by this administration, the only conclusion you can draw is the conclusion Glenn Beck has stated and that is the decline is purposeful.

fourdeucer on January 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Next thing you know
Shawty got low, low, low, low, low, low, low, low

faraway on January 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Could this be one of those “man caused disasters”?

Cybergeezer on January 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Shhhhh everyone, the Boob is on the tube announcing his big new tax on Banks.

So Barry raises taxes on banks and that doesn’t hurt us how?

Knucklehead on January 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM

How low do these charts go? Can they print them that low?
Cybergeezer on January 14, 2010 at 11:38 AM

They will need new metrics for the Obama administration – being ‘Unprecedented’ and all.

Juno77 on January 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I miss Jimmy Carter’s economy. Those were boom times compared to what we’re living through.

MJBrutus on January 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Maybe Geithner should contact Nature Magazine and the AGW experts and learn the trick about to “hide the decline”.

BobMbx on January 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Now hold on here….what about the TWO Million jobs that have been Saved or Created!!!

PatriotRider on January 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

So in other words we are doomed until 2013.

GnuBreed on January 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM

So what are we suppose to do? I dont think Democrats or Republicans have an answer. Both parties have shown they are more concerned with their personal welfare and staying in power then doing whats best for the people.

offroadaz on January 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM

It’s up to the GOP. If/when they regain power in 2012, they need to make balancing the budget in their first year the #1 priority. Prove they’re willing to make tough cuts in entitlements and wasteful spending and freeze the growth of government.

For all the inevitable crap they’ll get from Dems and the media(I know, I’m being redundant), the economic benefits that result from those policies will more than vindicate them.

Doughboy on January 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Honestly….there are thousands of business owners who could make better economic decisions.
I work with dozens that could turn this around in less then 90 days, and we would be totally out of it in less then a year…and after 5 years be 100% back to normal, and at a surplus…with no real sacrifice.
It is really very simple, they make it more complex because they need votes, and if they did the things they say they will look like buffoons because it is so counter to what they are doing.
That is the frustrating part…it is so simple, just a few changes every month, and the misery would be all over.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Are we sure those reverse hockey stick, Racist charts weren’t INHERITED from Booosh?

Juno77 on January 14, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Rudderless. And brainless.

UltimateBob on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

but it’s worth nothing that a year ago, that wasn’t true at all.

Was that done on purpose? ha…or is it really supposed to read ‘worth noting’ ?

bridgetown on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Obama inherited that chart.

Could someone go back on those previous recessions and get the quotes from the President at the time blaming the previous President for current recession?

And at what point with Obama does incompetence turn into doing it on purpose???

albill on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

And yet, the media continues to play Happy Face News with the economy. What a friggin’ joke.

This morning for the first time since before Christmas, the news appeared that retail sales in December were down, and for 2009 total they were disastrous (WSJ). Well, how about that…

Jaibones on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Hide the decline…

albill on January 14, 2010 at 11:52 AM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

That was true six months ago, but things have gotten worse…the priority right now is putting people back to work, in private enterprise. Just cutting back taxes won’t do it, we now need incentives…
Without details, I think our focus have shifted with the despairing news of increased unemployment.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM

The red line starts a nose dive right around the time that Obama was elected. Who would have thought that might happen?

farright on January 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM

They will need new metrics for the Obama administration – being ‘Unprecedented’ and all.

Juno77 on January 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Maybe they could use the charts from the Reagan Administration and just put a minus sign in front of all the numbers, scratch out Reagan and print Obama.

Cybergeezer on January 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Up until the point Obama was elected, this was a run of the mill, milder than average recession. Since then, disaster.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Doing the Obama Slide

faraway on January 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM

Now you’ve done it. That stupid song is going to be in my head all day! But instead of “It’s ELECTRIC”, I’ll be hearing “It’s OBAMA!”. Maybe a youtube parody showing all those in an unemployment line doing the Obama slide is in the making. And this craze will last longer as unemployment ranks grow.

singer on January 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Doing the Obama Slide

faraway on January 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM

The Unemployment Shuffle…

singer on January 14, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Remember that Obama’s administration consists of less than 10% from the private sector.

To a hammer the whole world looks like a nail.

jukin on January 14, 2010 at 11:56 AM

How many jobs were saved or created making such a pretty chart????

SDarchitect on January 14, 2010 at 11:56 AM

Now you’ve done it. That stupid song is going to be in my head all day!

singer on January 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM

It’s OBAMA!
Boogie Woogie Woogie

UltimateBob on January 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM

What part of “funemployment” don’t you people understand?

aquaviva on January 14, 2010 at 11:58 AM

November 2010 cannot come fast enough!

GarandFan on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

That was true six months ago, but things have gotten worse…the priority right now is putting people back to work, in private enterprise. Just cutting back taxes won’t do it, we now need incentives…

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM

Cutting taxes and cutting regulations provides incentives. It tells business people that they will be allowed to keep the money that they make. That’s the only incentive businesses have ever needed.

No matter how bad the economy gets, more govt is NEVER the answer.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private

Well then, looks like we’re screwed until at least 2010 when we can begin to take our country back from the Fascists and idiots!

dhunter on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

And with each passing day, Obama, and goons are systematically, intentionally trying to avert any recovery. Which in my opinion is indefensible. He’s breaking his oath to defend this country, by destroying it.

capejasmine on January 14, 2010 at 12:00 PM

If your purpose is the destruction of the US capitalist, free market system, then Dear Liar’s policies make sense.

rbj on January 14, 2010 at 12:02 PM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private

Well then, looks like we’re screwed until at least 2010 when we can begin to take our country back from the Fascists and idiots!
dhunter on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

Make that Idiot Fascists – except that may be repetitious and redundant.

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:02 PM

Cloward-Piven

UnderstandingisPower on January 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Rudderless. And brainless.

UltimateBob on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Or better than they hoped. It’s clearly one or the other so we either have a fool in the WH or a socialist maniac.

Oink on January 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM

If your purpose is the destruction of the US capitalist, free market system, then Dear Liar’s policies make sense.
rbj on January 14, 2010 at 12:02 PM

Yes, children, can we all say Cloward-Piven strategy?
(really liking the term “Dear Liar”)

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM

And with each passing day, Obama, and goons are systematically, intentionally trying to avert any recovery. Which in my opinion is indefensible. He’s breaking his oath to defend this country, by destroying it.

capejasmine on January 14, 2010 at 12:00 PM

I’m sorry “oath”? Aren’t oaths only good if you’re not a systemic, pathological LIAR?

UnderstandingisPower on January 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Hard pivot?

drocity on January 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM

“mainly by signaling to investors and businesses that costs will go up in taxes and energy prices, as well as burdensome mandates on health insurance. ”

Yep.

The country got the signals that the marxists intended to send.

By the way, have communists ever willingly given up power?

notagool on January 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Obama: “Handi-Man”

BobMbx on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

One big prolem with implementing the Cloward/Pivens Plan is that people will notice and start yelling.

Akzed on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

Obama has raped and pillaged the treasury and the economy so what else did anyone expect as an outcome?

rplat on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

Cloward-Piven

UnderstandingisPower on January 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Exactly.

fourdeucer on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

You should see the state sales tax receipts YOY if you want to see numbers. Here in SCOTT BROWN’s MA, state coffers are way off YOY despite the fact that the state sales tax was increased 25% from 5.0% to 6.25%.

singer on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

Rudderless. And brainless.
UltimateBob on January 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM

We really do need one of the trolls to chime in here and reassure us that Obowmao and the rest of National Socialists aren’t really that stupid.

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Look, everyone knows that if you want to improve the economy and employment you threaten small businesses with huge new burdens on hiring and prohibit energy exploration that is not government sanctioned ‘green’. The government exists to demonize those who aspire to succeed. It’s almost like the policies espoused by this administration are designed to result in the sustained declines shown on the charts.

The design of sustainable failure, without which a natural recover would interfere with our plans to remake America.

chaswv on January 14, 2010 at 12:09 PM

They are going to need a bigger chart for 2010Q1

cntrlfrk on January 14, 2010 at 12:10 PM

Another Porkulus will give the illusion of action while deepening our debt and creating more need for higher taxes in the future. We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

Obama believes he’s fundamentally transforming America and that central planning will be able to bring about economic justice and security for all when the government has the proper controls in place. That’s the agenda they’re working on. It’s useless to talk about basic economics; they reject “capitalism” and believe it has been discredited.

modifiedcontent on January 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM

We really do need one of the trolls to chime in here and reassure us that Obowmao and the rest of National Socialists aren’t really that stupid.

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:09 PM

The trolls have been laid off and are in the unemployment line.

Knucklehead on January 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM

B+!!!!!!!!

csdeven on January 14, 2010 at 12:13 PM

Cloward-Piven

UnderstandingisPower on January 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM

Yep…worth repeating.

aquaviva on January 14, 2010 at 12:13 PM

It’s called the Potomac two-step re-visited.

Rovin on January 14, 2010 at 12:14 PM

Cloward-Piven

UnderstandingisPower on January 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM
Exactly.

fourdeucer on January 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM

50+ years in the making. Search “1963 congressional record communist goals” to see their steady march and infiltration.

singer on January 14, 2010 at 12:14 PM

It’s useless to talk about basic economics; they reject “capitalism” and believe it has been discredited.

modifiedcontent on January 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM

Yep. Even those few Dems who once upon a time bothered to learn any economics have now discarded it. Hence the ease with which they reject all arguments based on classical economics.

Track-A-'Crat on January 14, 2010 at 12:15 PM

The real hard slide started in March of this year, when the recession should have bottomed out. That was when Obama released his first budget, which read like the Communist Manifesto and promised endless new taxes and regulation on business, skyrocketing energy costs, Card Check, and a myriad of other class-warfare, job-killing government programs.

The endless extension of unemployment benefits and food stamps to people with higher and higher incomes seems compassionate, but the reality is it keeps people from really getting desperate enough to take any job they can find. There are low-paying retail and service jobs all over the place, but the public benfits you lose exceed the salaries of those jobs.

Congress in its infinite wisdom also chose to raise the minimum wage in the middle of a recession last summer. Employers whose sales and revenues were already falling, who face higher taxes and more regulation, cannot afford to pay their bottom-rung employees more than they are worth, or to hire new ones.

rockmom on January 14, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Compare that 2007 line to the 1920′s unemployment line and you will get another nasty shock.

Obamavilles the fastest growing communities in America. Hmmm reminds me of a song about an adult beverage.

Wasting away in Obamaville,
Looking for my next permanent job,
Some people claim that is no one to blame,
But I know, its Obama’s fault.

(you’re all welcome to improve on the lyrics)

Bankruptcies are increasing. Mortgage failures are increasing.
Retail sales are way down. Manufacturing is way down (from the BLS website).

Ed is correct. We are not in a recovery. Quite the reverse, and “experts” have said they “expect” unemployment to remain “stubbornly high”.

dogsoldier on January 14, 2010 at 12:20 PM

By the way, have communists ever willingly given up power?

notagool on January 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM

The Sandinistas did in Nicaragua, when they were finally voted out of office. No thanks to John Kerry and the rest of the Democrats in the U.S. Congress though.

rockmom on January 14, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Yep. Even those few Dems who once upon a time bothered to learn any economics have now discarded it. Hence the ease with which they reject all arguments based on classical economics.
Track-A-’Crat on January 14, 2010 at 12:15 PM

It’s like being in a sinking ship and the captain says Hey, let drill a hole in the bottom to drain the water out!
Anyone who disagrees is a Racist, Global warming denier, Tea Bagger….

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:21 PM

November 2010 cannot come fast enough!

GarandFan on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

AMEN to that! but we can get a start by giving to Scott Brown to start the end of this little turd.

lukespapa on January 14, 2010 at 12:21 PM

inverted hockey stick

Capitalist Infidel on January 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM

Only the 1948 recession was close to being worse than the 2007 recession

I’m a little confused. The current “recession” looks a quantum worse on the employment evolution front; and worse on the output from, so how is the 1948 “close” to this one?

ParisParamus on January 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM

By the way, have communists ever willingly given up power?

notagool on January 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM

The Sandinistas did in Nicaragua, when they were finally voted out of office. No thanks to John Kerry and the rest of the Democrats in the U.S. Congress though.

rockmom on January 14, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Not to quibble, I see your point, but Ortega was re-elected in 2006.

aquaviva on January 14, 2010 at 12:27 PM

We have to make investment attractive, and the only way to do that is to cut taxes, pare back government programs, close the deficit through belt-tightening, and get Congress out of the private sector.

Government control worked in the soviet union, did it not?
They created lines for bread and toilet paper.

Johan Klaus on January 14, 2010 at 12:28 PM

It’s like being in a sinking ship and the captain says Hey, let drill a hole in the bottom to drain the water out!

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:21 PM

Infallible Left-wing logic there, Fake8.

Track-A-'Crat on January 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM

dogsoldier on January 14, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Thanks for getting the Obama Slide out of my head!

singer on January 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM

Would be interesting in those charts to see a marker for the point where Obama took over after Bush.

Scrappy on January 14, 2010 at 12:35 PM

The US needs a change in direction, and fast.

Yeah, regime change!

The President dithered over Afghanistan for months. We’ll be in 2014 by the time he makes his mind up about a change in economic policy.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 12:35 PM

Government control worked in the soviet union, did it not?
They created lines for bread and toilet paper.

Johan Klaus on January 14, 2010 at 12:28 PM

True but it was an either or situation. Obama economic policy strives to give you the ability to stand in lines for both bread and toilet paper!

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 12:39 PM

Would be interesting in those charts to see a marker for the point where Obama took over after Bush.

Scrappy on January 14, 2010 at 12:35 PM

Recession “started” 4th Qtr 07. Markets look forward, and Obama was known to be elected 4th Qtr 08 but it was baked in cake by August-September.

So, in top chart look 9-12 months from beginning, and in 2nd chart 3-4 quarters from beginning.

Basically, right about where the lines start to really shoot downwards…i.e where the slope becomes increasingly negative.

aquaviva on January 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM

It’s like being On a sinking ship and the captain says Hey, let drill a hole in the bottom to drain the water out!
Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:21 PM

Infallible Left-wing logic there, Fake8.
Track-A-’Crat on January 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM

Yes, I can just imagine some of the “Educated class” stroking their chin and wondering aloud ‘That just Might work’.

Fake8 on January 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM

2008 has a Red dialect

bbordwell on January 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM

No matter how bad the economy gets, more govt is NEVER the answer.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

I never said more gov., I said incentives…there are more incentives then just taxes in business.
Just lowering taxes won’t do the job, it won’t be quick enough.
You have fees that can be eliminated, you have city, state, county, and federal inspectors to limit, you have interstate commerce laws to repeal…many more then taxes, taxes is just up front where people not in business refer to, but that is not what is choking business from performing.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 12:43 PM

We are in a depression for goodness sakes.

True_King on January 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM

Wow! Those charts are compelling.
Related news, stimulus money diverted to global warming sycophants:

Washington, DC – In the face of rising unemployment and record-breaking deficits, policy experts at the National Center for Public Policy Research are criticizing the Obama Administration for awarding a half million dollar grant from the economic stimulus package to Penn State Professor Michael Mann, a key figure in the Climategate controversy.

“It’s outrageous that economic stimulus money is being used to support research conducted by Michael Mann at the very time he’s under investigation by Penn State and is one of the key figures in the international Climategate scandal. Penn State should immediately return these funds to the U.S. Treasury,” said Tom Borelli, Ph.D., director of the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project….

“It’s no wonder that Obama’s stimulus plan is failing to produce jobs. Taxpayer dollars aren’t being used in the ways most likely to spur job creation. The stimulus was not sold to the public as a way to reward a loyalist in the climate change debate. Nor was the stimulus sold as a way to promote the Obama Administration’s position on the global warming theory.

Also see Newsbusters

petefrt on January 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM

No matter how bad the economy gets, more govt is NEVER the answer.

MarkTheGreat on January 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM

Just remember, only gov can now correct the problem…that is the dilemma, since they are the only ones that can repeal laws, change tax and fee structures.
What we need is the best politicians that understand the role of the government.
We aren’t going to eliminate gov, so we have to vote in the right people to control it.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 12:47 PM

The US needs a change in direction, and fast.

Mr. Obama, will you kiss me?

petefrt on January 14, 2010 at 12:48 PM

This is what happens if you cross the streams.

Christien on January 14, 2010 at 12:55 PM

GULP..

eyes the exit…

sonofdy on January 14, 2010 at 12:56 PM

We’re gonna need a bigger chart!!!

ted c on January 14, 2010 at 12:56 PM

What we need is the best politicians that understand the role of the government.
We aren’t going to eliminate gov, so we have to vote in the right people to control it.

right2bright on January 14, 2010 at 12:47 PM

What we need to do is eliminate the political class. Teddy Kennedy able to have his fat rump in the same seat for 45 years is shameful. And, of course, he wasn’t the only one who has 4+ decades in Congress. We need term limits so that the Congress has more people who actually live like ordinary Americans.

highhopes on January 14, 2010 at 12:57 PM

If Obama and the Dems continue this race to the bottom, they’re going to need to add DEPRESSIONS to the chart to compare against!

dominigan on January 14, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Comment pages: 1 2