Dem press release: Scott Brown made a “deal with the devil” with “radical tea party groups”
posted at 9:31 pm on January 12, 2010 by Allahpundit
Via Weasel Zippers. Demagoging townhall protesters as “angry mobs” back in August did nothing for the DNC nationwide, but hope springs eternal for New England:
SCOTT BROWN’S DEAL WITH THE DEVIL
Will Republicans Sell Out To National Tea Party Movement Backfire At Home?
And If He’s Elected, Who Will He Owe?“Scott Brown made a deal with the devil – and he should have held out for a better one…Brown’s embrace of radical tea party groups for funding coincides nicely with his willingness to accept the millions in television ads from shadowy out-of-state organizations with links to Karl Rove…”
Consider this and their Palin-baiting to be an official admission that they no longer believe that running on a standard liberal policy agenda can carry them over the finish line even in Massachusetts.
Meanwhile, here was the scene after a Coakley fundraiser on Capitol Hill tonight, which makes twice in less than three months that Weekly Standard reporter John McCormack has had a bizarre encounter with a candidate opposed by the conservative base. Coakley staffers said afterwards that they didn’t know who the guy was who was hassling McCormack in the video. Really? He was just a passerby who decided to push him into a sidewalk railing and demand his credentials?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
LOL…meltdown.
ddrintn on January 12, 2010 at 9:51 PM
Democrats = scum.
D2Boston on January 12, 2010 at 9:52 PM
McCormack has some kind of magnetism for liberal outrage. LOL.
Coakley is in meltdown mode. Here comes the Scott Brown express.
cubachi on January 12, 2010 at 9:53 PM
Scott Brown already made a deal with Obama?
EA_MAN on January 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM
Violence. The tool of the Left.
Sapwolf on January 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM
Not to mention he worked for Halliburton and strangled a kitten.
ThePrez on January 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM
Sounds like the Hellfire Club.
I want in.
MadisonConservative on January 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM
So, how can you sell out to both the Tea Party, and Millions funded from Karl Rove (the ultimate Washington Insider)….
Romeo13 on January 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM
I love the smell of fear and flop sweat in the evening!
It smells like…Victory!
Bruno Strozek on January 12, 2010 at 9:55 PM
I hope the people in Mass. get to see this. If they vote for her know what they are getting.
Brat4life on January 12, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Oooooooooohhhhhhhh!
…and your grandmother wears army boots.
singlemalt_18 on January 12, 2010 at 9:56 PM
I don’t know if Brown will win, but Coakley DESERVES to lose. What a despicable human being.
BPD on January 12, 2010 at 9:56 PM
They really don’t have a clue…
kringeesmom on January 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM
That Leftwing Scum who pushed and shoved McCormack should be arrested and charged with assault.
“Touching” is grounds enough for an assault charge (or, rather, unwanted touching, as recorded in that video).
The Left isn’t going to stop this crud, and they’re getting more and more militant with this crud with every passing week.
Lourdes on January 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM
Someone gets in my face like that they’re gonna be left with some bad memories.
Punditpawn on January 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM
“Shadowy links to Karl Rove’s multimillion dollar campaign donor club?” Seriously, NOBODY is stupid enough to buy this.
Sure a handful of moonbats will squint through the crack smoke and say, “Yeah, dude, like, totally.” But then they’ll forget all about it two seconds later.
Pretty much the only good thing I can say about the RNC these days is that the DNC sometimes acts even crazier than they do.
logis on January 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM
So Tea Party people are akin to the devil?
Who knew that the “right to disagree with any administration” would become so evil just a few years later.
Bishop on January 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM
I hope Scott Brown fires back with an add that stating that Coakley got money from pharma and other big business lobbies in Washington this week.
chris999 on January 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Damn those radical tea party groups… we can’t have that in Boston…
ninjapirate on January 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM
The Devil… Karl Rove. Boo!
Are you scared yet?
Buy Danish on January 12, 2010 at 10:01 PM
(clears throat)
Ladies and Gentlemen…
I give you, ‘The Democrats’!
Seven Percent Solution on January 12, 2010 at 10:01 PM
Oh my gosh this is getting funny. Compare this to the uplifting video on Brown’s facebook page.
I think we might be seeing a full liberal meltdown right before our very eyes.
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Said by General Cornwallis I believe.
Holger on January 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM
This was released while Coakley was in DC making deals with all of BHO’s devils….?
d1carter on January 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM
We know who she is.
My 86 yr old MIL is going to go to the local senior center and try to round up votes for Scott “until (she said) they throw me out!
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Yes. Get ready to be totally demonized 24/7 by Hollywood, news media, etc. in 2010. This is a preview of their strategy for fall elections.
chris999 on January 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Mass voters are used to deals with the devil, being Kennedy country and all that. Maybe Teddy is the go between.
Monica on January 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM
I love your Mom
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM
With so many thugs on the payroll, it’s hard to keep them straight.
malclave on January 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM
I keep looking at the picture of the DC party I got for Christmas. It’s my inspiration when I exercise.
Go ahead and demonize because that picture is all about freedom and liberty and that’s the most important thing.
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Ooooooo! Now I’m a wadical!
ya2daup on January 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Most of Coakley’s supporters are people at the trough. Like her, they think they are entitled like aristocracy. It’s 1776 all over again here in Coakley’s MassachsettEs.
TheBigOldDog on January 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM
MIL, actually, but I’ve always called her Mom (even though I have one of those, too!
Surrounded by strong women – it’s good to be me.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM
RT @michellemalkin: Purple Army to Martha Coakley’s rescue: Here comes SEIU’s $685,000 ad buy: http://is.gd/6aglz #masen
TheBigOldDog on January 12, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Just win the @#$% election.
/grump
ElectricPhase on January 12, 2010 at 10:07 PM
It has been a while since I posted here. Trouble in Haiti. Please pray for them and consider making a donation.
Click on my moniker or visit haitisbabies dot org. All of our funds will be diverted to disaster relief.
Sorry for the threadjack
Thanks,
Soap
On-my-soap-box on January 12, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Karl Rove?!!!!
They are using Karl Rove?????!!!!!
Rove resigned on August 31, 2007.
Karl F’n Rove???!!!!
These people (Dem’s) are despicable.
David2.0 on January 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM
My Mom always called her MIL Mom too.
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM
True, Dog; but I keep telling people that at the street level, even the eaters (those who don’t produce, but consume,) are fed up.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM
Somebody is going to have to get that “Hit Me” sign off McCormack’s back.
ddrintn on January 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM
So that makes Coakley’s toads Tories right?
2ipa on January 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM
Can you just imagine?
If this is any indication – the mid-terms are going to be .. uhhhhhhh, entertaining?
And ’12 will require martial law.
GoldenEagle4444 on January 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM
“with links to Karl Rove” That’s hilarious. Karl Rove is awesome.
Narutoboy on January 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM
Well, that, and just sort of limited in imagination and intelligence.
ddrintn on January 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM
I’m sorry, I could not have kept my cool with that tool, I would have really relished stomping a mudhole in his a$$!
conservnut on January 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM
D-E-S-P-E-R-A-T-I-O-N
=====================
canopfor on January 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Yeah, going to the polls will require full body armor.
ddrintn on January 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM
I’m sorry but just what is radical about Tea Partiers? Demands for lower taxes? Demands for smaller government? Demanding that government get out of our lives? Isn’t that what Massachusetts’ forefathers were demanding? The radicals!!
DerKrieger on January 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM
And I agree, Karl Rove? Give me a break, they are really getting desperate now.
conservnut on January 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM
Experienced weasel spotters are arguing whether it was a Yellow-backed Purple Belly or an Child Prostitute-Running ACORNball.
ya2daup on January 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM
do you think many people even remember who Rove is?
deidre on January 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM
Martha’s running against:
Bush
Cheney
Rove
Rush
Basically, anybody but Scott Brown.
In her world, she doesn’t have to debate him on the issues; just keep saying ‘bushcheneyhaliburtonroverushhitler’ like it’s a conjuring spell that will imbue her with the Camelot magic.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM
That’s per your link, BigDog. Cause we all know how great cap and trade legislation is going to be for the “working men and women” of SEIU. Oh, that’s right, I forgot. They’re going to get all those green jobs.
chris999 on January 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM
His Majesty King George III shares his support for the contempt shown by Mass. Democrats towards so-called “tea parties”.
Techie on January 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM
So, the Dems are sending in the SEIU money and muscle…
d1carter on January 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM
1) Not really into voting for people who call me the devil. Not really their intent, but, you know, hearts and minds.
2) Not sure Boston is the best place to associate your OPPONENT with the Tea Party in hopes of defeating them.
Merovign on January 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM
If that guy would have pushed me he would gotten one heck of a beat down.
DerKrieger on January 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM
A “deal with the devil” ??? Prove it. Teddy K. killed a girl, that we know. But for some reason this alleged deal with someone the dems don’t believe in is supposed to make everyone not vote for Brown?? The left never dissapoints in their idiocy.
4shoes on January 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Don’t you know? When you ask a lib a tough question, or throw up a quote of theirs, or do something really outlandish like demanding that they actually “represent” you. That is considered assault, and makes you Hitler.
conservnut on January 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM
I am rolling on the floor at that, because you know shes sitting in her office with Harry Potter glasses trying that in desperation.
theoneandonlyfinn on January 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Oh, the moonbats do. Heck, they still spit on Atwater’s grave.
ddrintn on January 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM
It’s going to backfire. I think even MA voters have had enough.
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM
Desperation. The Dems ugliness is more apparent than ever.
CWforFreedom on January 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM
When a wild animal is backed into a corner, is when they’re the most dangerous, and will lash out.
Seems to me, that the same can be said for a liberal, who’s existence in a Senate seat is threatened.
Absolutely agree….desperation!!!
capejasmine on January 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM
Martha Coakley and the Democrats are trying the reanimation machine with Teddy Kennedy…
… but he just keeps catching on fire. Must have been the wake.
Seven Percent Solution on January 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Refusing to submit is radical.
Wanting to preserve (dare I say ‘conserve’) what’s best about America is radical.
Meeting in large groups to protest (which used to be called the right to peacefully assemble) is radical.
Guess we need to add “Radical-American” to the census.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Smell the glove.
LibTired on January 12, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Coakley’s audience is becoming more “selective”
Techie on January 12, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Heh, yeah. Ironic eh? I’m thinking she would have had issues with the originals too.
29Victor on January 12, 2010 at 10:17 PM
I wonder what the dolts on the left will do if Mr. Brown wins. Me thinks there will be a few riots.
txag92 on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Video: Someone With the Coakley Campaign Pushes Me into a Metal Railing
=============
Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Martha Coakley attended a fundraiser at the Capitol Hill restaurant Sonoma tonight. After the event concluded, Coakley took two questions from the media but declined to say whether or not she stands by her statement at last night’s debate that there aren’t any terrorists in Afghanistan (and that they’ve all gone to Pakistan or Yemen).
After taking a question from a CNN reporter on the street outside the restaurant, I asked her:
TWS: Attorney General Coakley, you said last night that there are no terrorists in Afghanistan–that they’re all in Yemen and Pakistan. Do you stand by that remark?
COAKLEY: I’m sorry, did someone else have a question?
GRIFF JENKINS, Fox News: I did. Why are you in Washington tonight?
COAKLEY: We planned an event after the primary that would be a unity event in Washington. We’re also in the middle of a very intense campaign [...]
After Coakley finished her answer, she began walking away from the restaurant, and I walked behind her asking why health care industry lobbyists were supporting her at the fundraiser. She didn’t reply.
As I walked down the street, a man who appeared to be associated with the Coakley campaign pushed me into a freestanding metal railing. I ended up on the sidewalk. I was fine. He helped me up from the ground, but kept pushing up against me, blocking my path toward Coakley down the street.
===========================================================
Militant Liberal Political Insurgency Tactics!!
I’m wondering,since Team Hopey has been in power for almost
a year,minus 8 days,and they have accomplished zero,
are the Liberals who have an axe to grind,are they now start
ing to take it out with candidates that are up for re-election!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
canopfor on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Hermoine is already working for Scott Brown.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Go MOM!!
Brat4life on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Radical Tea Party = Law Abiding lovers of The Constitution.
Hening on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
By the way…
What does Martha Coakley do when she is not smelling her fingers?
Seven Percent Solution on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
It’s not even “firing back.” This is the strongest ad Scott Brown could run:
chunderroad on January 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Torrie 8itch!
conservnut on January 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Hey, when the Union guys are taking her money to hold her signs and telling everybody who passes by they are voting for Brown, you know she’s toast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S518s32jjic
TheBigOldDog on January 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
The elections are going to get ugly, not just between the candidates either. I believe there will be violence in Massachusetts.
Holger on January 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
She’s running against Palin,too. Shouldn’t they throw in Tom Delay, and Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and Nixon/Agnew for good measure. Oh, and Joe McCarthy. Newt Gingrich, the neocons.
chris999 on January 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Not only are they trying to bait Palin into talking about the race and endorsing Brown… they’re using her name as a scare tactic already in ads:
Union plans major ad buy for Coakley
Enoxo on January 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM
2010
====
The year of the un-hinged,un-glued,Liberal!!
canopfor on January 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Oh, isn’t that just an intelligent move – using the same wording as the wild-eyed Bible-thumping fringe when you’re getting nervous about the election’s outcome.
What a bunch of cowardly little weasels.
Dark-Star on January 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM
This is more delicious than a decadent, melting, chocolate fountain of pure delight.
I wonder what brand of deodorant the dems are wearing now. The kind that completely stops you from perspiring and makes you puff up like Teddy?
Or the kind that makes you smell like you are a sweating donkey standing in a field of sh*t after you rolled down a hill full of funkified ‘transparency’ sh*t?
Hmmmm?
Key West Reader on January 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM
From the Weekly Standard:
TWS: Attorney General Coakley, you said last night that there are no terrorists in Afghanistan–that they’re all in Yemen and Pakistan. Do you stand by that remark?
COAKLEY: I’m sorry, did someone else have a question?
Ha! The most transparent Democrats evah! It’s even more amusing when one remembers that she is an Attorney General. Clearly she is used to asking probing questions, but answering them? Not so much.
FAIL.
And as for their new improved plan to attack Brown on “climate change” they better be promising some Global Warming if they want Coakley to win since Bostonians are freezing their arses off.
Buy Danish on January 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM
Leave Michelle Obama outtah this!
This press release is funny coming from the campaign of the woman who is for making deals with muslim terrorists.
SouthernGent on January 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM
They’re putting Lee Atwater, Ed Meese and John Mitchell in their next press release. This conspiracy is deep, deep I tell you!
ya2daup on January 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM
ding ding ding ding
Colorado Anne on January 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM
That’s the next Ad buy.
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Why is it Democrats can never attack the message, just the messenger. All they do is name call. Spoiled kids… typical liberals.
Dasher on January 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Have been hearing all over Boston talk radio tonight that Coakley is
sayingpleading at fundraisers that if she doesn’t win, then 2010 is going to be hell on Democrats.Probably the truest words she’s spoken in this campaign.
singer on January 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Not every candidate can get the honest, no strings-attached funding from sources such as SEIU. /
ICBM on January 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM
“No wonder Brown’s campaign is being supported by the same extremist group that backs Sarah Palin,” the narrator says. “Martha Coakley for Senate. Massachusetts values.”
Enoxo on January 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Enoxo: No wonder Liberals are screwed up,thinking is not
and never is an option,just repeat the parrot Lefty
talk’n points!!
canopfor on January 12, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Earth to union guys – most Americans don’t believe in man-made global warming and I believe Mr. Brown is pro-choice.
gophergirl on January 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM
I heard that her next ad blames some of her woes on Herbert Hoover.
conservnut on January 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM
She is reported to have told the people at the fundraiser, “If I don’t win, 2010 is going to be Hell for the Democrats.”
Maybe she means she is going to actually start prosecuting all the political corruption in MassachusettEs rather than letting the Feds do what little they can.
TheBigOldDog on January 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM
massrighty on January 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Don’t forget Strom Thurmond and Trent Lott.
ICBM on January 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM
The elections are going to get ugly, not just between the candidates either. I believe there will be violence in Massachusetts.
Holger on January 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
I’m not doubting you, I’m just saying we haven’t really had any violence to speak of in American elections since 1968. But I don’t know Mass politics. Why do you say there’ll be violence?
chris999 on January 12, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »