Palin signs “multi-year” deal to become Fox analyst

posted at 1:36 pm on January 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Sarah Palin’s supporters have reason to cheer, and perhaps lament, the media news leaked to the New York Times this morning.  The former governor and VP candidate will become a Fox News analyst, signing a multi-year deal for appearances as a political pundit.  That gives Palin an even larger stage, but might mean that she’s looking at a longer game plan than some may want:

The network confirmed that Ms. Palin will appear on the network’s programming on a regular basis as part of a multi-year deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Ms. Palin will not have her own regular program, one person familiar with the deal said, though she will host an occasional series that will run on the network from time to time. This person would not elaborate, but the network does have a precedent for such a series. Oliver L. North is the host of an occasionally running documentary series on the military called “War Stories.”

It’s a good move on Palin’s part.  She gets more national exposure, which never hurts anyone’s political ambitions.  Fox News may be already attracting her core supporters, but her appearances will receive a great deal of scrutiny from the Left as well.  The regular to-and-fro on politics will allow Palin to expand her credibility and build a broader base of support for her political ambitions.

However, a multi-year deal may mean that Palin will wait to run for higher office.  She could either go for the Senate or the presidency next, but either way, she’d have to start building a campaign no later than a year from now.   Media outlets generally cut off analysts when they start building campaigns to avoid the necessity of giving opponents free air time for responses.  A multiyear deal doesn’t preclude the possibility of entering into a campaign in 2011, but it indicates that Palin isn’t yet envisioning such a step.

That’s not necessarily a bad idea anyway.  Palin is young and has plenty of opportunity to run for office, with 2016, 2020, and 2024 all being very realistic for her in terms of presidential campaigns.  The Fox appearances will give her an opportunity to hone her craft while keeping expectations in check.  Taking her time would be a smart move, and at least since her resignation from office, Palin has been making a series of smart moves.

But for those who wanted a Palin run in 2012, this could be a temporary disappointment.

Update: HA commenter Cubachi notes via Twitter that Roger Stone predicted this in July:

Palin has the most valuable commodity a Presidential candidate can have – a base. Between roughly 23% of Americans and 68% of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin. She alone has the kind of intense following. She alone can fill a large hall or small stadium anywhere in Republican Country. This is similar to the following that sustained Nixon through two defeats and his ‘self-destruction’ in 1962 to win the White House in 1968.

Like Nixon, Palin needs some rehabilitation to her political image caused by the relentless attacks of the elitist media, the knife-work of the relatively talentless Republican Party pros like Steve Schmidt and her own self-inflicted wounds from the post election period that were born out of inexperience at this level of political combat. Like Nixon, Palin can re-make herself in the controlled environment of television. Instead of being tortured by smug media types like Katie Couric, Palin can demonstrate her better understanding of issues and articulate a case against Obama. She can be folksy and plain-spoken and above all, ‘smart.’ All hail the Conservative Oprah!

The “New Palin” is crucial to the expansion beyond her base of true believers to be a viable presidential candidate. The obvious place for Palin to re-tool her political image is FOX television. FOX’s viewers are Palin’s potential voters. It is ironic that FOX president Roger Ailes is the genius TV producer who erased candidate Nixon’s flaws in a controlled environment and facilitated the greatest political comeback in American history, is at the helm at FOX.

Not ironic, but perhaps providential.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6 7

I don’t really like the Nixon connection that Stone is making. I can see his point, but no one looks at Nixon as a political success role-model — at least not in a permanent sense. Surely Reagan would have been a better example in so many ways.

JackOfClubs on January 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM

Almost anyone is more realistic than Palin, but if you want a few names: Pawlenty, Romney, Jindal, Daniels, inevitably some people who aren’t on the radar now but have qualifications that exceed 2 years governing Alaska.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 5:19 PM

You named 4 GOP Mondales there. But my gut feeling is that Palin will never run or be nominated, so relax. There’s just too much resistance against her from within the Republican party. So, they can nominate whatever bland sacrifical lamb they want, as far as I’m concerned.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 6:05 PM

Missing the big question here:

Who will Palin endorse in 2012? Huckabee? Or Romney?

Sackett on January 11, 2010 at 6:00 PM

Neither. No one. I think she’ll be content to let the GOP cut its own throat in its own way.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 6:07 PM

Excellent. I’m thrilled!

mperek on January 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM

Well, our politicians don’t have to have a TV show before we consider them worthy of election.

Dave Rywall on January 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM

H*ll no, all they have to do is prove the have the correct lefty principles and/or spouse, like Jack “the hack” Layton and his lefty looney tunes wife.

ProfessorMiao on January 11, 2010 at 6:13 PM

I haven’t read all of the posts, but I just saw on Fox News that Sarah Palin will be on Bill (blech) O’Reilly’s show tomorrow night, 1/12/10 at 8:00 PM ET. I wish they would have put her on with someone else instead of (I have to interrupt you all of the time) O’Reilly.

sicoit on January 11, 2010 at 6:16 PM

I haven’t read all of the posts, but I just saw on Fox News that Sarah Palin will be on Bill (blech) O’Reilly’s show tomorrow night, 1/12/10 at 8:00 PM ET. I wish they would have put her on with someone else instead of (I have to interrupt you all of the time) O’Reilly.

sicoit on January 11, 2010 at 6:16 PM

Well, it is the highest rated show on Fox, makes sense to me that she makes her debut there. She will probably be on Beck and Hannity later as well.

Her own specials that will air later will be HUGE though…Can’t wait!

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM

This will drive the MSM batshmit; The MSM will investigate everything from FOX to look for Palin input; This is a brilliant move by FOX, since it capitalizes on the MSM “Conservative Disorder”, and duplicity in journalism.
Masterly move by FOX!

Cybergeezer on January 11, 2010 at 6:24 PM

This is as stupid an idea as hosting “Death Valley Days”

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM

I am actually disappointed in this move by Palin. I can’t articulate why exactly, but my gut sank when I read Ed’s post. Something seems cheezy to me about it.

KickandSwimMom on January 11, 2010 at 6:26 PM

She hasn’t even BEGUN and you all jump in to judge what it will be and how it will affect her.

Uhhh..how about waiting at least a week? 7 days…can ya handle that?

bridgetown on January 11, 2010 at 6:28 PM

I don’t really like the Nixon connection that Stone is making. I can see his point, but no one looks at Nixon as a political success role-model — at least not in a permanent sense. Surely Reagan would have been a better example in so many ways.

JackOfClubs on January 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM

Nixon had negatives that were more entrenched than Reagan’s. Like Nixon, Palin will have to change opinions that were formed in the course of national exposure.

Both Nixon and Reagan held important government jobs before winning the White House. Palin probably needs something beyond a half term and a cable news consultancy.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Well, it is the highest rated show on Fox, makes sense to me that she makes her debut there. She will probably be on Beck and Hannity later as well.

Her own specials that will air later will be HUGE though…Can’t wait!

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM

I look forward to seeing her on with Beck and DEFINITELY with her own specials! GO SARAHCUDA!

sicoit on January 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM

bridgetown on January 11, 2010 at 6:28 PM

I like your logic; How long do we give Obambi?

Cybergeezer on January 11, 2010 at 6:33 PM

Palin’s got class! Does Obambi have a Twitter account?

Cybergeezer on January 11, 2010 at 6:34 PM

Well, it is the highest rated show on Fox, makes sense to me that she makes her debut there. She will probably be on Beck and Hannity later as well.

Her own specials that will air later will be HUGE though…Can’t wait!

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM

I think BillO might just re-telecast his last interview with her.
But I won’t be watching. BillO has that racist hatemonger on his show and I refuse to tune in even if Sarah’s on it.

macncheez on January 11, 2010 at 6:34 PM

Both Nixon and Reagan held important government jobs before winning the White House. Palin probably needs something beyond a half term and a cable news consultancy.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Good thing we’ve got Romney. Yeah babaaayyyy!! Eeeesh.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM

BillO has that racist hatemonger on his show and I refuse to tune in even if Sarah’s on it.

macncheez on January 11, 2010 at 6:34 PM

Which racist hatemonger? I don’t watch O’Reilly much anymore…

uncivilized on January 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM

I have said it before .Do not under estimate her you do at your own peril.Also remember death valley days i am sorry that was a tv host that in 1979 only has a 25% approval rating with the American people.After all he went on to be defeated in a land side by the great Jimmy Carter. Who 4 months before the election held a 15 point lead.

thmcbb on January 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM

I have said it before .Do not under estimate her you do at your own peril.Also remember death valley days i am sorry that was a tv host that in 1979 only has a 25% approval rating with the American people.After all he went on to be defeated in a land side by the great Jimmy Carter. Who 4 months before the election held a 15 point lead.

thmcbb on January 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM

What does that mean when translated into English?

thomasaur on January 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM

I have said it before .Do not under estimate her you do at your own peril.

Agreed.

Basically, she will get several 1-hour campaign commercials on the most widely watched network among GOP primary voters.

And she will get paid for it.

Pure genius if you ask me.

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM

What does that mean when translated into English?

thomasaur on January 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM

Yoyu are either 40 or less or sadly lacking in knowledge of American History

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:54 PM

AH, HAHAHAHA

Charles K no-showed for the Fox Panel, tonight. He’s probably back in his office, pounding his “educated class” head on his desk. AH, HAHAHAHAHAHA

james23 on January 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM

If Obama was scared of Sarah on Facebook….he’d better watch out now!!

I’d like to see her do a special on political corruption with Michelle Malkin.

njpat on January 11, 2010 at 7:02 PM

She’ll probably have to lock her retarded children in her dressing room, so not distract viewers from her HOT bod.

This is just an example of what the liberals are saying of Palin at Fox. They have become hugely apoplectic, heads are blowing up today.

royzer on January 11, 2010 at 7:03 PM

One of the funny themes in these comments is the few diehard Romneycare “Conservatives” taking their cue from Ed that Sarah is now out of their way. Like this nit wit

So does this mean the Palinistas will finally get behind a realistic candidate for 2012? If so, happy days!

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 4:20 PM

Yeah, you know Speedball, now that Ed says Palin is out of the way for 2012, I’m suddenly taking a second look at Obamacar…er Romneycare. Big thumbs up for that Individual Mandate. Bailouts for automakers are making sense now, too. Suddenly, Mittens seems so far ahead of his time.

AH, HAHAHAHAHAHAHa

james23 on January 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM

This is as stupid an idea as hosting “Death Valley Days”

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Phooey on you! Tomorrow as planned I am still going to watch my just arrived double feature mail order dvd:

Cattle Queen of Montana (Ronald Reagan, Barbara Stanwyck)/Tennessee’s Partner (Ronald Reagan Rhonda Fleming, John Payne).

Sarah I love you, but don’t tell Mrs. Fawlty!

Basil Fawlty on January 11, 2010 at 7:08 PM

They have become hugely apoplectic, heads are blowing up today.

royzer on January 11, 2010 at 7:03 PM

You say that as if it were a bad thing!

I’d rather see Sarah Palin, an adult with serious views, discuss the issues than John McCain’s spoiled inane tart of a daughter drone on about how she is the future of the GOP. If it causes the left some heartburn, all the better.

highhopes on January 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM

Yoyu are either 40 or less or sadly lacking in knowledge of American History

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:54 PM

I know that reagan hosted DVD (I watched as a kid) but he never lost in a landslide to Carter.

thomasaur on January 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM

Anyone want to take bets on how long it will be until the lefties call for a boycott of Fox advertisers?

Can they file ethics charges on commenters?

They’ll be after Fox real bad now, with Sarah, Beck and Hannity in one place.

njpat on January 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM

Ed posted this? Where’s AP?
 
This must be good news. If it could be spun against the Governor, AP would be on it like a fly on mobeetie.

Blacksmith8 on January 11, 2010 at 7:16 PM

This is as stupid an idea as hosting “Death Valley Days”

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Good one! Ronnie learned a lot working in Hollywood that served him well later on.

leftnomore on January 11, 2010 at 7:18 PM

I was watching The Fox Report With Shepard Smith and he mentioned that Sarah Palin would be a regular on Fox with a goofy smirk on his face. Shep is such a schmuck!

MCGIRV on January 11, 2010 at 7:19 PM

Which racist hatemonger? I don’t watch O’Reilly much anymore…

uncivilized on January 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM

Just a guess, but it must be M. Hill.

Itchee Dryback on January 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM

LOL!

Remember when Palin resigned as Governor in July of 2009? Pundits (Allah & Ed included) fell over themselves in excitement and predicting that this surely meant she was not running in 2012.

Deja Vu.

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 2:32 PM

Not only that, the promised us “the other shoe” of scandal that was “about to drop.” Still looking for that shoe, are our bloggers.

james23 on January 11, 2010 at 7:21 PM

One of the funny themes in these comments is the few diehard Romneycare “Conservatives” taking their cue from Ed that Sarah is now out of their way. Like this nit wit

So does this mean the Palinistas will finally get behind a realistic candidate for 2012? If so, happy days!

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 4:20 PM

AH, HAHAHAHAHAHAHa

james23 on January 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM

Who is Mitt Romney?

portlandon on January 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM

Well I think we should all hold on to our opinions and give the Governor a chance to prove herself. As her new role at Fox becomes more clear we’ll be able to judge from her actions. Think about it. It’s not like she’ll have a critical function or lives will be at stake. Even if she does meet everyone’s expectations, she should be allowed to take her own time and make her own way.
 
Really, if her job were critical to the country like say the President or Vice President then we’d of course have to see some specific delivered ability and outcomes. We wouldn’t be able to wait a few months to a year and see how it plays and whether we feel comfortable with her new role.
 
Yea, go with that, stinking libtard, dhimmicraps.
 
I’ll stick with Sarah
 
FREEDOM!

Blacksmith8 on January 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM

Ed posted this? Where’s AP?

This must be good news. If it could be spun against the Governor, AP would be on it like a fly on mobeetie.

Blacksmith8 on January 11, 2010 at 7:16 PM

They take shifts. Allah has been working on his post all day, trying to put in all the triggers that make Palinistas go rabid, and the trolls to attack.

The Puppetmaster knows his strings…..

portlandon on January 11, 2010 at 7:27 PM

At first the idea of her committing to a multi-year contract was a little disconcerting….however…
I wonder if Roger A. is finally starting to play hardball against the “0” for the alleged FCC threats…
You know the ones over certain topics, people who work for him in Prime Time…
“Don’t talk about where I was born or who my daddy is“….ummm…I wonder…
If so…smart move Roger…unleash the Cuda feeding frenzy …
Its one thing to read what she says and its another to watch….HAHAHAHA

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 7:32 PM

Is there any thread that draws out the trolls more than the Palin threads?

Bring ‘em on. I love to see the fear.

petefrt on January 11, 2010 at 7:33 PM

First stop Red Eye!

SA

scipioafricanus on January 11, 2010 at 7:37 PM

I wonder if Roger A. is finally starting to play hardball against the “0” …

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 7:32 PM

If there is a God in Heaven, I want to thank Him for Roger Ailes. And thank you personally, Mr. Ailes! Millions in this country thank you. By your courage and competence, you have become almost as influential as George Soros’s money. You have done as much to rescue the Constitution as anyone who comes to mind.

petefrt on January 11, 2010 at 7:41 PM

A Palin post!

SWARM moonbats, SWARM!

jjrakman on January 11, 2010 at 7:43 PM

petefrt on January 11, 2010 at 7:41 PM

Prediction: FCC starts flexing again if SP strays from the script…
Which was/is my concern.

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 7:51 PM

Norwegian on January 11, 2010 at 5:38 PM

A Palin supporter saying someone else is bad on TV is like a Huck supporter saying the other guy is too religious. She screwed up an easy interview and hasn’t been on another one since. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:04 PM

Anybody know the longest shelf life of a one-time politician who took an extended sabbatical from office? In our ADD era I’m guessing five years tops (depending on previous experience) before they have to put up or shut up. For Palin I’d surmise don’t let things slide more than three before running for something.

Seth Halpern on January 11, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Don’t worry Seth,
This relationship with Fox is symbiotic.

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM

Shep is such a schmuck!

MCGIRV on January 11, 2010 at 7:19 PM

+1

He and Anderson Kooky should go teabagging together

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 8:13 PM

She screwed up an easy interview and hasn’t been on another one since. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:04 PM

It’s fair to judge Palin on one interview, but unfair to judge Romney on RomneyCare. Logical.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 8:14 PM

She screwed up an easy interview and hasn’t been on another one since. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:04 PM

More to the point, since Jindal screwed up his only national TV appearance so far, would it be fair to say he’s totally washed up and unelectable now? I’d say your answer would be “no” to that.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM

She screwed up an easy interview and hasn’t been on another one since. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:04 PM

She hasn’t been on an interview since?

huh?

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:21 PM

She screwed up an easy interview and hasn’t been on another one since. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:04 PM
She hasn’t been on an interview since?

huh?

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:21 PM

The meaning being she hasn’t been interviewed by Couric or Gibson since.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 8:23 PM

There’s going to be an announcement about Sarah Palin taking the Fox News job on AUSTRALIAN cable TV.

What other GOP candidate would make international news like this.

Crux Australis on January 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM

It is really surprising and disappointing that Hot Air allows Dark-Star to continue commenting.

AsianGirlInTights on January 11, 2010 at 5:37 PM

Yeah, not even a warning. That’s really something.

But God help the next person who posts something even mildly non-enthusiastic about the wondrous magnificence that is Michelle Obama…

Kensington on January 11, 2010 at 8:34 PM

In our ADD era I’m guessing five years tops (depending on previous experience) before they have to put up or shut up.

Seth Halpern on January 11, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Funny stuff.
The left wing libtard, and oh sooo gullible idiots, are the only ones suffering from ADD. The American people will remember quite well what has been attempted.
Palin has put up with and shut up scores of effete little metrosexual cupcakes, like you’ll find make up the majority of the Liberal left, that I’m guessing its gotten almost boring for her.
You need to direct the ‘put up or shut up’ suggestion to the wounded party of the liberal democrat. Its been less than a year and they are battered almost senseless with a loss of direction. All they have now is blind hive mentality.

Itchee Dryback on January 11, 2010 at 8:35 PM

She hasn’t been on an interview since?

huh?

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:21 PM

I’m not counting any Fox News softball interviews. Do her supporters really think she is going to get elected President without going on Meet the Press at least once?

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

The meaning being she hasn’t been interviewed by Couric or Gibson since.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 8:23 PM

That’s right. In fact your fearless political heroine never appeared on a Sunday news program or even held an open press conference while running for Vice President!

All she’s done are softball interviews with Greta and Sean. No wonder she’s joined the team! She’s an intellectual coward.

chumpThreads on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Okay HotAirheads, You know what this means:

FAVRE/STOSSEL 2012!!!!!!

abobo on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

YOU BETCHA!

Philly on January 11, 2010 at 8:40 PM

Meet the Press at least once?

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

All she’s done are softball interviews with Greta and Sean. No wonder she’s joined the team! She’s an intellectual coward.

chumpThreads on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

You guys crack me up…what else ya got…hahahaha

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 8:46 PM

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2009 at 8:14 PM

You are the type of person to declare Tom Brady all washed up based on one subpar performance yesterday against the Ravens. Oh by the way, Brady through for over 4000 yeards in the regular season.

One swallow does not make a summer.

technopeasant on January 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM

I’m not counting any Fox News softball interviews. Do her supporters really think she is going to get elected President without going on Meet the Press at least once?

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Not true… off the top of my head, she has since been on with Lauer (NBC) twice, Wolf Blitzer (CNN) twice, Walters (ABC), various correspondents from the network and cable news after her resignation, dozens of interviews with local media in Alaska (some hostile).

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Good thing we’ve got Romney. Yeah babaaayyyy!! Eeeesh.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM

Mitt lacks charisma. If the GOP nominates him, they are hoping that a bland competent guy can look good if the country sees Obama (accurately) as inept.

The good news for Obama is that the GOP bench isn’t deep for 2012. Maybe senate wins in 2010 will produce some compelling figures.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Some psychologists would refer to that as selective recall. I would call it finding a contaminated needle in the haystack and then trying to convince or prove to others that you not expect to find any sanitary needles in one.

technopeasant on January 11, 2010 at 9:01 PM

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Don’t confuse the troll with facts…/S

jerrytbg on January 11, 2010 at 9:02 PM

Not true… off the top of my head, she has since been on with Lauer (NBC) twice, Wolf Blitzer (CNN) twice, Walters (ABC), various correspondents from the network and cable news after her resignation, dozens of interviews with local media in Alaska (some hostile).

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Lauer and Walters are entertainment hosts on networks that have political shows.

She should have gone on Stephanopoulos. He’s reasonably fair and avoids stupid gotcha stuff.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM

It’s a good move on Palin’s part

Politically a great move. She undercuts Mike Huckabee’s act on Fox News. Her air time will be less than his, considering his HeeHaw hour on the weekend, but she will appear on more shows in various time slots.
Toe to toe she destroys Huck.

Huckabee no longer has the Fox soap box to himself.

FireBlogger on January 11, 2010 at 9:11 PM

That’s right. In fact your fearless political heroine never appeared on a Sunday news program or even held an open press conference while running for Vice President!

She wasn’t allowed to talk to the press during the campaign.

All she’s done are softball interviews with Greta and Sean. No wonder she’s joined the team! She’s an intellectual coward.

chumpThreads on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

“All she’s done”? Hardly. “Coward”? It’s not the word I’d associate with Palin. Want to know what intellectual cowardice is? Preaching small government while putting in place a state insurance mandate. Standing by while a clown like Al Franken steals an election. That sort of thing.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:28 PM

Do her supporters really think she is going to get elected President without going on Meet the Press at least once?

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Slow down Sea Biscuit…its a long way to the home stretch.

Itchee Dryback on January 11, 2010 at 9:35 PM

Maybe senate wins in 2010 will produce some compelling figures.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Not in time for 2012 though. Waiting around for some hero on horseback to suddenly appear and fire up voters sounds to me like Obama’s re-election victory.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Do her supporters really think she is going to get elected President without going on Meet the Press at least once?

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Pfffft. How many voters vote based on Meet the Press appearances anyway?

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Not in time for 2012 though. Waiting around for some hero on horseback to suddenly appear and fire up voters sounds to me like Obama’s re-election victory.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Unless Hillary switches parties, the GOP is lacking a top contender. If Palin were the nominee it would be a referendum on her. Obama could sidestep an evaluation of his record.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 9:52 PM

Unless Hillary switches parties, the GOP is lacking a top contender. If Palin were the nominee it would be a referendum on her. Obama could sidestep an evaluation of his record.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 9:52 PM

That’s ridiculous. Her referendum would be in the primaries. She would have to successfully debunk the false image people have of her to become the nominee.

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 9:54 PM

Unless Hillary switches parties, the GOP is lacking a top contender. If Palin were the nominee it would be a referendum on her. Obama could sidestep an evaluation of his record.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 9:52 PM

Ever presidential election is a referendum on the candidates.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:56 PM

By the way, she debuts tomorrow night on O’Reilly.

KittyLowrey on January 11, 2010 at 9:57 PM

That’s ridiculous. Her referendum would be in the primaries. She would have to successfully debunk the false image people have of her to become the nominee.

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 9:54 PM

She was pummeled in the fall of 2008. What has she done since then to change people’s opinion about her readiness for office? Resigning the Governorship for Fox and Facebook isn’t a strong argument for the nation’s top job.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 10:00 PM

Ever presidential election is a referendum on the candidates.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 9:56 PM

Sometimes it’s a referendum on just one of them, or on the guy leaving office.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM

She was pummeled in the fall of 2008. What has she done since then to change people’s opinion about her readiness for office?

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 10:00 PM

There hasn’t been a primary yet. That’s what they’re for.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 10:03 PM

The network confirmed that Ms. Palin will appear…

“Ms.”? I know we’re still trying to shirk the specter of sexism, but isn’t calling a married woman anything other than Mrs. insulting?

But for those who wanted a Palin run in 2012, this could be a temporary disappointment.

Why? I have full confidence in her ability to quit this job, too.
I’m more concerned with the 2010 Congressional elections anyhow, which have received little serious attention by “conservatives”. Sure, “conservatives” keep talking about how they’re going to win, but I ask: with whom and how? Who are the “conservatives” with the guts, money, and name to run? Who are the voters who will actually vote for them, as opposed to blindly, sheepishly voting “R” out of the fear that a scary “D” will win?
“Conservatives” have good ideas as to how to run a country, but they couldn’t win an election if their lives depended on it. You talk about Republicans returning to their roots. Sure, name one “conservative” Republican President besides Reagan from the 20th century. Name more than 5 “conservative” Republicans in the Senate. Name more than 10 in the House. The Republican party is broken, folks. They fear not, and have no respect for, “conservatives” because they know they own your votes. Don’t believe me? How else do you explain George Bush, Sr., Bob Dole, George Bush, Jr., and John McCain?

Send_Me on January 11, 2010 at 10:07 PM

There hasn’t been a primary yet. That’s what they’re for.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 10:03 PM

Hope she runs. It would certainly boost the national attention for the GOP primaries.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 10:10 PM

Why? I have full confidence in her ability to quit this job, too.

I’m more concerned with the 2010 Congressional elections anyhow, which have received little serious attention by “conservatives”. Sure, “conservatives” keep talking about how they’re going to win, but I ask: with whom and how? Who are the “conservatives” with the guts, money, and name to run? Who are the voters who will actually vote for them, as opposed to blindly, sheepishly voting “R” out of the fear that a scary “D” will win?

Send_Me on January 11, 2010 at 10:07 PM

A lament over the lack of “conservatoive” candidates with “guts, money and name” after a snark about Palin’s “quitting”. There’s your answer. None are going to be good enough.

ddrintn on January 11, 2010 at 10:11 PM

For better or worse, this will allow her to get her POV across… hopefully for the better. America deserves better than Obama… hopefully, that better means Pailn.

Yakko77 on January 11, 2010 at 10:15 PM

now but have qualifications that exceed 2 years governing Alaska.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 5:19 PM

Obama? He was a governer….no, a mayor…..no, that is not right either; a senator.

Johan Klaus on January 11, 2010 at 10:16 PM

My guess is that she will be introduced/broken in slowly, then her role will become more regular if not daily, and then she’ll be very, very successful, be happy, make a ton of money, keep doing it and never run for public office again.

okonkolo on January 11, 2010 at 10:16 PM

Yoyu are either 40 or less or sadly lacking in knowledge of American History

bill30097 on January 11, 2010 at 6:54 PM

He is neither; the quote he refered to had enough structural flaws in it to make it indecipherable.

massrighty on January 11, 2010 at 10:16 PM

She should have gone on Stephanopoulos. He’s reasonably fair and avoids stupid gotcha stuff.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM

Two words:
Clinton Rumpswab.

massrighty on January 11, 2010 at 10:21 PM

I think some of you are jumping the Shark on this one. This move doesn’t necessarily preclude her from running for President in 2012 and in fact it seems to me that it shows that she hasn’t made up her mind about it yet and is merely taking advantage an excellent opportunity to raise her profile and get her message out to a wider audience, whilst at the same time refining her delivery.

In twelve months after the mid term elections I think we will have a better understanding of the direction that Sarah Palin will go in. At the moment it is still too early to tell but this deal with FOX is a smart move as it provides her some security if she decides in twelve months that the timing isn’t right for a run at the White House. Conversely if the Political landscape is looking favourable in twelve months and she does decide to Run it will provide an excellent leaping off point for her campaign.

Hellrider on January 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM

She was pummeled in the fall of 2008. What has she done since then to change people’s opinion about her readiness for office? Resigning the Governorship for Fox and Facebook isn’t a strong argument for the nation’s top job.

dedalus on January 11, 2010 at 10:00 PM

True, but the primaries will settle it. She will either rise up and show herself as a capable and knowledgeable leader, or she won’t.

Until then, her base will support her, the left will hate her, and the ‘middle’ will continue to not care.

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 10:31 PM

Conversely if the Political landscape is looking favourable in twelve months and she does decide to Run it will provide an excellent leaping off point for her campaign.

Hellrider on January 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM

Plus, being on Fox News will give her ample opportunity to develop and refine her positions, as well as gain experience in debating national policy in a more friendly setting. Furthermore, the resources that will now be available to her (in terms of advisors, mentors, consultants — think John Bolton) will be tremendous. This is always a tricky issue with ‘outsider’ candidates who don’t exactly have a vast network of people to rely on when forming a campaign. ‘Insider’ candidates always have an advantage because the party apparatus will, generally, put things together for them. ‘Outsider’ candidates, such as Palin, will have to start from scratch and do the intensive networking themselves. Being in Alaska with no one but her childhood friends to advise her is a non-starter, imo. Fox News will help her get on her way.

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 10:37 PM

Ok! I now know who I am going to vote for in our next Presidential election. It’s going to be the person who is on the most Sunday news shows and who is interviewed by the most popular, lefty newscasters, and reporters. That way I can be led down the path to the proper voting decision.

Lord knows I can’t think for myself. I must vote for the candidate that follows all the “rules” and has the most favorable reviews.

Vince on January 11, 2010 at 10:38 PM

BPD on January 11, 2010 at 10:31 PM

You cannot forget the growing number of independent conservatives and libertarians who will gravitate towards her once she establishes herself a force of nature of Fox News, which she will.

technopeasant on January 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM

Hmmm …

Let’s see – Huckabee has a deal with Fox – does this mean he’s taking himself out of the race in 2012.

Sometimes blogging pundits have nothing better to do than read tea leaves – which are better left to Chinese soothsayers but … I digress.

Palin will be a force in 2012.

She may not be on the ballot.

But the person she endorses for the nomination – WILL get it.

That’s power.

HondaV65 on January 11, 2010 at 10:58 PM


Why doesn’t Palin just run for Senate in Alaska in 2014?
Having her there will depress libtards and excite the base just as much as anything. And its something she has a fairly good chance of winning as long as she explains why she quit as Governor.

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 4:26 PM

Because, unlike you, she’s not a moron!

We’ve all had this conversation. This woman has been a Chief Executive, a CEO, if you will, of both a city and a state, going to the Senate for Palin would be like taking the CEO of Toyota and making him a just a salesman in a dealership!

There is nothing for her to gain by being in the senate, absolutely nothing.

And if you spew some crap about her “needing to learn how it works” I swear to God I’ll reach through this computer!

Sarah dealt with her legislature every single day. She knows exactly “how things work.”

After spending a solid year looking at Alaska politics I’d say it is just as nasty and toxic as anything DC can come up with.

If she jumps into a political race, as a candidate, it will be as POTUS.

You can wish that isn’t so, but you can’t wish undeniable truths away.

gary4205 on January 11, 2010 at 10:59 PM

Wow Fox promoted Palin from Facebook to the Network, the highest rated Network on cable! Wow just wow!

CCRWM on January 11, 2010 at 11:00 PM

I think some of you are jumping the Shark on this one. This move doesn’t necessarily preclude her from running for President in 2012 …

Hellrider on January 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM

It’s wishful thinking and hoping on Ed’s part. ;)

He don’t like her.

I hate to say this – but I think that AP and ED have been impacted by the “inside the beltway” mentality. They prefer the old “Ayatollah” Republicans – you know – the ones that drove us into the ditch?

Thankfully, Michelle has kept in touch with the peeps.

HondaV65 on January 11, 2010 at 11:02 PM

So does this mean the Palinistas will finally get behind a realistic candidate for 2012? If so, happy days!

Speedwagon82 on January 11, 2010 at 4:20 PM

The answer is yes.

scotash on January 11, 2010 at 11:04 PM

scotash on January 11, 2010 at 11:04 PM

Subtle. Well played.

massrighty on January 11, 2010 at 11:06 PM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6 7