DoD review of Hasan shows superiors ignored their own warnings
posted at 12:55 pm on January 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Those who blamed political correctness for Army Major Nidal Hasan’s continued service while generating all sorts of red flags about his behavior will perhaps find themselves vindicated in an internal DoD review. The Associated Press reports that Hasan’s superiors in the chain of command were well aware of Hasan’s Islamist stridency and behavioral problems. None of them took steps to address them, though, and even gave him good fitness reports that allowed him to gain promotions:
A Defense Department review of the shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, has found the doctors overseeing Maj. Nidal Hasan’s medical training repeatedly voiced concerns over his strident views on Islam and his inappropriate behavior, yet continued to give him positive performance evaluations that kept him moving through the ranks.
The picture emerging from the review ordered by Defense Secretary Robert Gates is one of supervisors who failed to heed their own warnings about an officer ill-suited to be an Army psychiatrist, according to information gathered during the internal Pentagon investigation and obtained by The Associated Press. The review has not been publicly released.
Hasan, 39, is accused of murdering 13 people on Nov. 5 at Fort Hood, the worst killing spree on a U.S. military base.
What remains unclear is why Hasan would be advanced in spite of all the worries over his competence. That is likely to be the subject of a more detailed accounting by the department. Recent statistics show the Army rarely blocks junior officers from promotion, especially in the medical corps.
This review does not include the actions or inaction taken as a result from Hasan’s contacts with Anwar al-Awlaki. That aspect is being handled by criminal investigators looking to build a case against Hasan in his eventual trial or court-martial. This review is restricted to what the Army could have done to stop Hasan before he murdered fourteen people and wounded dozens more.
But it’s hard not to put the two together and wonder what Hasan’s superiors were thinking. Awlaki was a suspect in the 9/11 attacks who had fled the US to avoid capture, resurfacing in Yemen as an AQ recruiter and propagandist. If Hasan’s superiors were made aware of this contact, then these suspicions should have led immediately to the suspension of Hasan and an investigation of his activities.
Instead, the Army allowed Hasan to continue his progress despite knowing themselves that Hasan was getting more radical and more irrational. While the Army is loath to kick medical personnel out of the service, these particular issues should have resulted in some sort of action. At least for now, the appearance is that the Army was overly sensitive about challenging Hasan’s increasingly radical Islamism and his erratic behavior that sprang from it.
Update: My friend AJ Strata has more from a CBS News report on the review. Read it all; he concludes:
As I noted many times, John Brennan openly said during the campaign he wanted to dial back our hair trigger responses to possible threats. I think he and the President did just that, and 13 Americans were murdered as a result.
It is also interesting this report snuck out while the big mea culpa show on Flight 253 was attracting everyone’s attention. But I doubt Congress will miss this – at least I hope they don’t.
Some of these red flags popped up during the Bush administration, though, so we can’t lay it all on Obama.
Radio Vice Online has a good roundup of commentary.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Already down the memory hole.
RobCon on January 11, 2010 at 12:56 PM
wonderful!
I feel better
/s
cmsinaz on January 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Only in America does a 9-11 happen, and the military becomes SOFTER towards the perps.
leftnomore on January 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM
So having a mentally unstable, anti-American psychiatrist in charge of working with American soldiers with PTSD is supposed to help, how?
rbj on January 11, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Bet the farm it was political correctness. I won’t bore anyone with my own experiences, but I can say with most certainty that his superiors didn’t do anything so that they could protect themselves from claims of discrimination, racism, or harrassment.
Hog Wild on January 11, 2010 at 1:04 PM
What a way to help boost troop morale.
/not
Brat4life on January 11, 2010 at 1:05 PM
Maybe if they had promoted him to GENERAL, he might have had second thoughts…….!!!
robertb on January 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM
The Army Surgeon General was fired because of crappy wounded soldier living conditions at Walter Reed. The Walter Reed Commander was fired. This was because of bad carpet, old paint and bureacracy. However, there are 14 dead and 30 wounded soldiers after the same bureacracy that failed to identify poor soldier living conditions in wounded barracks, also failed to identify a provider that flaunted his SoA and Islamofascist tendencies and did nothing about it.
an interesting and helpful juxtaposition. Where are the hearings? Where is the media?
ted c on January 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM
sad ain’t it? they’re fighting those ‘overseas contingencies’ for this type of crap
cmsinaz on January 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM
And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.
- General Casey, Army Chief of Staff
MB4 on January 11, 2010 at 1:12 PM
This is one thing…and NOW, they are moving the trial of a Navy SEAL to Iraw…someone who shouldn’t even have charges filed against him…
Pretty soon we’ll all have to protect ourselves, because military higher ups are all too willing to promote terrorists but try our servicemen that dare give one a bloody lip.
tmedlin on January 11, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Now that Hasan has fulfilled his own jihad prophesy, is anyone taking Islam and jihad more seriously? Not so long as our PC senior military leadership remains in place to fret, as Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey frets, about the fate of “diversity” post-Fort Hood. “Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength,” Casey told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.”
Only a zealot could say such a thing, a zealot whose duty is to prioritize “diversity” over the lives of his troops. And only a “diversity”-zealot could be blinded to the Fort Hood-underscored fact that the teachings of Islam are irreconcilable with the goals of the U.S. military, and that anyone who takes those teachings seriously shouldn’t be serving in the U.S. military.
The zealotry lives on, even as Fort Hood buries its dead.
- Diana West
MB4 on January 11, 2010 at 1:14 PM
We already knew this information. I still think it has a lot to do with our culture and how we put doctors on pedestals.
AnninCA on January 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM
The remark by General Casey, quoted above by others, is the most troubling aspect of the Hasan shootings. If the Army Ch of Staff won’t connect the dots, we are in deep trouble.
He needs to be replaced, yesterday.
james23 on January 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM
fire ‘em all
J_Crater on January 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM
Oh we know what they were thinking.
MB4 on January 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM
A military having a fifth column does wonders, everyone knows that.
the_nile on January 11, 2010 at 1:22 PM
They are all tied up looking through Sarah Palin’s garbage cans and Rush Limbaugh’s medical records. None left to pursue petty stories like this.
Extrafishy on January 11, 2010 at 1:22 PM
Bush’s fault
Defector01 on January 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Admilal Mullen – facilitator of child rape?
MB4 on January 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM
“Political correctness?”
Absolutely!
newton on January 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM
I wonder what, if any, effect this will have on recruitment and retention. When the troops believe that the brass doesn’t give a damn about them, it makes it hard to follow these same brass hats into battle. For the most part they are psychologically prepared to go to war. They know the deal they signed up for. But being in fear of the next wack-job Islamist in their own ranks is not what they signed up for and they should not have to deal with this.
Extrafishy on January 11, 2010 at 1:28 PM
I feel very sad for the familied of those whose lives were lost. This does not make any of the hurt go away and nor will the lawsuits that are sure to follow, but I don’t have sympathy for any of the military personnel that didn’t speak out due to fear of retribution. I know that hindsight is 20/20, but what they did was cowardly and their actions cost the lives of 14 people. While it was one man that decided to carry out the attack, let us all hope that military personnel will never allow political correctness to rule the day again.
BioTeachEd on January 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM
Social promotion, because if you work really hard to make someone feel good about themselves all of their problems disappear.
Cindy Munford on January 11, 2010 at 1:30 PM
This is not surprising, at least from the Civil-side perspective of federal work. Amazingly you can’t get someone fired for incompetence: you need at least three years of demonstrated incompetence and inability to do a job to even begin the out-processing paperwork. You could get their clearances yanked quickly, thankfully, but actually getting such people out of the workforce was more than a tad difficult. And, mind you, that three years of poor performance appraisals, documented inability to do work and multiple counseling sessions still meant that you were likely to see another couple of years of counseling…
And even with that we had such people who got promoted. One good word by ANYONE in the record was enough to do that and required starting the three year cycle all over again. The name we had for the place these people were in was called many things but ‘The Penalty Box’ was the most civil. And if any of these people filed EEO grievances or had ANY connections, they basically got promoted because they gamed the system.
On the civil side Hasan would have been a security risk… how he was not one on the military side is beyond me. That is quite worrying that this happened. I’ve seen its equivalent in the civil workforce but nothing as grotesque as the Hasan case.
ajacksonian on January 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM
Unfortunately, the military’s response to every failed social experiment they undertake is more of the same.
Extrafishy on January 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM
These promotions were isolated.
LibTired on January 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Ditto.
AnninCA on January 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM
we traded the discomfort of confronting this guy for the temporary peace it bought us. A temporary peace that was shattered by this calamity….
So much for appeasing. It’s like feeding an alligator in the hopes he’ll eat you last.
ted c on January 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM
The good part about the military is that it’s codified and steady. The bad part about the military is that it’s codified and steady.
AnninCA on January 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM
Nobody in that chain of command wanted to be called/labeled a racist and/or charged with descrimination. It would destroy a officers career wether it was true or not.
SHARPTOOTH on January 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM
I’d rather have very little diversity and have a safer military, more excellent universities, and first-rate leadership. If you want to play in the big yard, you have to be EXCELLENT, not just brown.
Bob's Kid on January 11, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Um, because he’s a Muslim?
drjohn on January 11, 2010 at 1:48 PM
Related parodies: Authorities Defend New “Paint By Numbers” Approach to Terrorism Investigations As “So Much More Fun” Than the Old “Connect the Dots” Method http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/11/authorities-defend-new-paint-by-numbers.html
National Security Officials Undergo Terrorism Sensitivity Training http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/11/national-security-officials-undergo.html
Mervis Winter on January 11, 2010 at 1:48 PM
But the failure to do anything after this, you sure can.
LTC John on January 11, 2010 at 1:50 PM
Thanks for the link Ed! BTW, the Bush administration did not only detect the contacts between Hasan and an the radical cleric al-Aulaqi in Yemen (most likely detected by NSA) they initiated investigations by terrorism task forces (2) under apparently under the FIS Court authorization.
What is suspicious is how these investigations were shut down under Eric Holder around the time they would need to be reviewed for continuation.
Cheers, AJStrata
AJStrata on January 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM
You are so wrong. Read AJ Strata’s reconstruction of timelines, since it seemed you read his posts.
When do the red flags under Bush turned screaming radioactive hot? And the active follow-up on the warning signs were ABRUPTLY dropped. When, you ask? Jan, 2009.
Gee, what could be happening in Jan, 2009, I wonder?
Sir Napsalot on January 11, 2010 at 1:54 PM
High gloss, semi gloss, matte or eggshell?
BL@KBIRD on January 11, 2010 at 2:00 PM
EVERY ONE OF THOSE BASTARDS WHO GAVE HIM GOOD RATINGS SHOULD BE FIRED!
GarandFan on January 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM
Terror aspects aside, how long before nonmilitary medical schools start following the same PC guidelines in allowing incompetent Muslim students to graduate and fill the void of competent physicians created by Obamacare?
a capella on January 11, 2010 at 2:17 PM
Yes, they did, and it was the biggest question I had for them. I really struggled with the Muslim outreach by the Bush Admin., knowing full well that those who were reaching back were Islamist propagandists.
Connie on January 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM
I think that the outreach to Muslims has reached its tipping point.
It’s really clear that we have to take these jihadist statements clearly, even if it means that some passionate types get caught up.
AnninCA on January 11, 2010 at 2:27 PM
I agree. I think a LOT of that story revolves around the medical profession.
AnninCA on January 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM
By the way, this is a must-watch:
PJTV’s BILL WHITTLE INVESTIGATES: The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets
Connie on January 11, 2010 at 2:42 PM
where do you think that the military medical school learned this PC guideline crap….they sure weren’t the first to institute it…they learned it from other medical schools..
so, you’ll be happy to know that there are tons of PC-ified and AA’d young doctors out there that are no smarter than the ones that let Hasan waltz right by, SoA card a flashin’, prepping his powerpoint slides to tell them how muslim soldiers should be allowed to be let out of deployments. We’re there bro.
ted c on January 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Lack of moral courage on parade.
Fletch54 on January 11, 2010 at 3:20 PM
Such is par for the course in the federal government. Supervisors always see the problem employees, but never will put in writing their observations on their appraisals and/or fitness reports. This would have been true no matter how he was failing. The excuse is always: We would waste the money we used to train him, or he will improve, or we will get sued. Failure is the main option in the federal government.
federale86 on January 11, 2010 at 3:30 PM
Or POTUS, just sayin’.
Electrongod on January 11, 2010 at 3:43 PM
If higher ups were aware of the potential problem annd promoted the threat to levels of higher access, then they should be held accountable for failing their responsibilities and be held directly responsible for the massacre. From personal experience, the levels of incompetence in the military can be incomprehensible in some cases. This is more common place than you can imagine.
volsense on January 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM
It’s like the saying goes – “screw up, go up”.
Since it’s a colossal hassle to get rid of the guy, the best way is to promote him and get him out of your hair. It’s not easy to fire someone in the touchy-feely litigious military today, especially not an endangered species-protected minority. Doesn’t matter if he’s a terrorist or not, obviously.
The best feasible solution was to promote him and get him away. There are so many obstacles to removing him or court-martialing him as the enemy (which he pretty much stated he was well before Ft. Hood) that, while insane, it’s the only feasible solution.
The army personnel at the base he left are probably glad they promoted him up & out. As f*cked up as that is, what other choice do they have? No one cares, no one will listen, no one will do a damn thing because you have to convince REMF bureaucrats that he’s the enemy – and to the REMF, like Casey – they believe that your lack of diversity awareness is the enemy. They don’t fight battles, they hold seminars.
Y’all are mistaking govt for the private sector, and the shaft of the spear for the point. The problem is it’s run by admin pogue bureaucrat REMFs – and they’re the disease – jihadis in the army are just a symptom.
Chesty Puller would be frying the lot of his command. Patton would be handing out .45 caliber courts-martials like it’s cool.
CPL 310 on January 11, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Soooooo…what do you suppose would qualify for this rare event in the Army if Hasan’s behavior and repeated contacts didn’t?
Oh yeah…DUI, fatbody…all those vital national security areas that show disloyalty.
Apparently.
James on January 11, 2010 at 5:59 PM
The screw ups were Hasan’s first, second, and third level supervisors, not President Bush or President Obama.
They kept him because the Army had a lot invested in him as a psychiatrist and it would not be politically correct to fire him.
Diversity in the work force and in the Army is a good thing, but, in this case, the casualties of diversity and politically correctness are 13 dead and 30 wounded.
slp on January 11, 2010 at 6:05 PM
There is a culture of fear of standing up to racism in the military. Oh, I mean “reverse” racism.
Maquis on January 11, 2010 at 6:28 PM