Quotes of the day
posted at 9:30 pm on January 10, 2010 by Allahpundit
“[S]ince Republicans have no power to remove Reid from his position, the majority leader remain in place unless he decides to step down voluntarily or Democratic senators turn against him. Neither seems likely.
“‘He has no intention of stepping down as majority leader,’ Reid spokesman Jim Manley said. ‘Unlike others who advocate moving our nation backwards, and viewing this moment for political gain, he’s working, today, tomorrow and the next day to move our country forward.’
“‘Mr. Steele and Sen. Cornyn want Reid out because they know they can’t beat Reid’ in November, Manley said.”
***
WILL: I don’t think there’s a scintilla of racism in what Harry Reid said. At long last, Harry Reid has said something that no one can disagree with, and he gets in trouble for it.
CHENEY: George, give me a break. I mean, talking about the color of the president’s skin…
WILL: Did he get it wrong?
CHENEY: … and the candidate’s…
WILL: Did he say anything false?
CHENEY: … it’s — these are clearly racist comments, George.
***
“If any Republican were caught speaking this way about Obama — even in private — liberal cries of racism would be filling the air. I can’t imagine how anyone can disagree with that. I see nothing wrong with acknowledging that double standard. I’m not sure that taking it to the next level and calling Reid a racist is the way to go. It’s a hateful and dispiriting tactic when liberals use it against conservatives. It would be hypocritical for conservatives to mimic it solely in the spirit of payback.
“As far as political tactics go, I’d rather Republicans simply acknowledged the double standard and chalked it up as yet another example of how Washington’s liberal Democrats have one set of rules for themselves and another for everybody else. That’s the sort of message that will win elections for Republicans in November. Shouting ‘the Democrats are racist’ won’t.”
***
“Recall that Reid once rushed to declare Justice Thomas to be ‘an embarrassment to the Supreme Court.’ When pressed for specifics, Reid declared that one of Thomas’s opinions was similar to ‘an eighth-grade dissertation’ — far inferior, Reid said, to the opinion of Justice Scalia in the same case. Except that Thomas’s short opinion was perfectly logical . . . and Scalia hadn’t even written an opinion in the case…
“So decry the attacks on Reid as political correctness — if you think that’s what they are. Some of us don’t agree. Some of us happen to think that his declarations about the comings and goings of Obama’s ‘Negro dialect’ are a little window into Harry’s soul.
“And if we’re wrong, I won’t feel too bad. Reid is simply getting a taste of the medicine he has so eagerly dished out to others.”
***
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
Caucasian,mongoloid and negroid are all scientific classifications. I said earlier that this place was full of woefully ignorant people.
thomasaur on January 11, 2010 at 12:08 AM
Night MeatHead.
(Was that racist?)
atheling on January 11, 2010 at 12:08 AM
Speak for yourself.
As for me, ignorance is bliss.
Kini on January 11, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Well,I’m off to sleepcity,where the ban hammer can’t get me,
and I’ll see,’you people’ tomorrow!!(I kid):)
canopfor on January 11, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Nighty nite fellow humanoid from the Great White North!
Kini on January 11, 2010 at 12:16 AM
Shortly after Watson, Hicks and Franklin photographed the double helix in an Xray, Science came to see overt features were not all that reliable for classification.
I can’t really argue with people who are so full of liberty of the mind, they can discuss what the Negroes ought to call theyselfs.
You know that big blowout against the Dems this November? Only happens if people bother to vote at all. You’re not helping.
Chris_Balsz on January 11, 2010 at 12:17 AM
As a Mormon myself, I’ve always been displeased with Harry Reid and find him to be an embarrassment to the LDS Church.
However, is not true that the Mormon Church (properly called the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) is a racist institution.
Given that people are talking about the LDS Church and its history with African Americans, I think people should at least educate themselves on this issue rather than just making uninformed statements about the LDS Church.
I encourage everyone to read here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Conservative Samizdat on January 11, 2010 at 12:20 AM
Now you’re being silly. Grow up.
atheling on January 11, 2010 at 12:21 AM
What Harry Reid said isn’t racist? What the hell are George Will and Bill Kristol smoking? A “Negro” dialect? Give me a break!
changer1701 on January 11, 2010 at 12:22 AM
Absolutely, anthropology is considered a science. Scary, is it not, what some people don’t know.
If a “census” of HA was taken where do you suspect the above mentioned group may fall, within the age bracket and *public* schooling area?
Yoop on January 11, 2010 at 12:23 AM
Agreed.
Saltysam on January 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM
Intnent? Past Record?
I guess they could to give Imus the same benefot of the doubt.
Don will have a ‘party’, sitting on Harry’s remarks on Monday for most of the 3 hours.
zdpl0a on January 11, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Just depends on individual politics, and that’s EXACTLY IT: If you’re on the left, tea-party participants are “racists, straight-up”, although other proclamations, such as, “typical white-woman”, “He is sharp and does not speak that ghetto black language” (which he does, given the audience), well, that’s fine. Plus, “He would be the one fetching the coffee 3 years ago”- Well, well,well, that’s only inside beltway generic” talk” and means nothing in particular. HOWEVER, if you shout, “You Lie” now you’ve committed the worst of worst, vile of vile.; you are branded for life and beyond. You have DONE THE UNFORGIVABLE, and we’ll trash on NPR, we’ll trash you in newspapers, on television, every media venue we can concoct.—YOU ARE ANTI-AMERICAN, and a RACIST in the WORST form imaginable. YOU ARE A NAZI and a creep to boot.
betsyz on January 11, 2010 at 12:33 AM
What she said.
atheling on January 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM
If Trent Lott had to go for what he said Harry should follow suit! But c’mon he is a Democrat! Yes there are two sets of rules. Look for all the race hustlers to come out in full force for Harry. I hope Rush and the rest of talk radio buries him tommorrow!
Dire Straits on January 11, 2010 at 12:39 AM
But Schumer (gag me) wants Harry’s job.
Connie on January 11, 2010 at 12:46 AM
Connie on January 11, 2010 at 12:46 AM
Pop the corn.
Saltysam on January 11, 2010 at 12:50 AM
Oh, Rush has so many places to go with this tomorrow. I hope I can hear his whole show.
His humor will be on steroids, and his message will be devastating.
Saltysam on January 11, 2010 at 12:52 AM
Indeed, this just might bring out some political cannibalism.
Put plenty of butter on that popcorn
Kini on January 11, 2010 at 12:55 AM
I hope so to because this is just around the corner and will not bode well for Mr. “Hope and Change” and his line of not being elected to help out the fat cats on Wall St.:
(via Realclearpoliotics)
Banks prepare for big bonuses and public wrath
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/business/10pay.html
and shades of Newsweek of the 70′s for the eco-fundamentalist:
(via instapundit)
The mini ice age starts here
By David Rose
Last updated at 11:17 AM on 10th January 2010
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html#
The hits just keep coming for the “adults” in charge.
Baxter Greene on January 11, 2010 at 1:07 AM
Every now and then people say exactly what they think instead of couching their terms in vagaries. He’s a dork and that comes out occasionally.
Mojave Mark on January 11, 2010 at 1:22 AM
Tomorrow is going to be very interesting indeed. Look for Harry to start making that looong walk back to Searchlight Nevada. Na Na Na Na, Na Na Na Na, Hey Hey-ey, Good Bye!
Dire Straits on January 11, 2010 at 1:48 AM
“A slave is a man who cannot speak his mind”.
Some Greek philosopher.
Not defending Reid but I hear a lot of blacks using the N word in reference to each other and black comedians referring to whites in rather derogatory terms too – e.g. honky, cracker, etc. etc.
In today’s pc environment blacks have much more vocal freedom than whites.
BowHuntingTexas on January 11, 2010 at 3:37 AM
Someone posted this link above. Watch the second video from 16:30 to 24:00 where Horowitz lays out what Bambi did for the first year and Pat Caddell tells you why the republicans are going to lose if you don’t stop stupidity like:
It’s too late to sit back and watch.
gh on January 11, 2010 at 5:10 AM
We’re the stupid ones.
Dumping Lott was an “Own Goal”.
Donks won’t do the same.
That’s to their credit.
We shoot ourselves in the foot,
They should follow suit?
Haiku Guy on January 11, 2010 at 6:03 AM
Both Obama and Reid ARE RACISTS in different ways!
But… that’s Democratic Party! The Home of the Racists!
Too bad that all black Americans are already under the slavery of the Democrats and Socialists!
TheAlamos on January 11, 2010 at 6:14 AM
To be precise.
TheAlamos on January 11, 2010 at 6:15 AM
One of the above statements is wrong though the idea that Reid is unbeatable is absurd on so many different levels, I give a slight edge to DS.
The reality is that Reid isn’t going anywhere, too distracting in the midst of trying to hijack the health industry. He made a racist statement that, from a political standpoint, isn’t completely inaccurate. He will have to do a few more mea culpas and it will be over. Trent Lott was forced out by his party and Reid fully enjoys the support of all the Democrat criminals despite the fact he acted stupidly.
highhopes on January 11, 2010 at 6:49 AM
Best comments!! thanks for summing it up so well….
chai on January 11, 2010 at 6:58 AM
Dems had Al Sharpton on Morning Joe at 6:40 this morning to run interference for Harry Reid. Comedy gold. I hope Hot Air gets the entire segment.
Among other things, Sharpton reserved his greatest outrage for Clinton because of his comment about Obama’s fetching coffee for others.
Right now, Dems are trying to scream “Squirrels” a la the movie Up in order to divert attention away from Reid. Earlier in Morning Joe, arguments were being made the the authors of the new book didn’t play by the right rules in quoting Reid.
Hypocrisy is the order of the day with Dem pieces of sh*t.
BuckeyeSam on January 11, 2010 at 6:59 AM
Pat Caddell and David Horowitz video
Thanks Kini for the two videos. I love Pat Caddell and his honesty about the Democrat Party…..I hope more Democrats come to their senses before we are completely taken over by these nuts.
yoda on January 11, 2010 at 7:12 AM
Let him stew in his own sweat… screeching for his resignation only allows him to play the victim… and CONTINUES the “every comment everybody makes about Obama is racist” meme.
This should have been used to show that not everything Obama comment should be seen as racist… and put the press on notice that next time, the Right wants the same benefit of the doubt that we gave Reid.
Oh well… the screeches of “RACISM!” will now continue unabated.
mankai on January 11, 2010 at 7:23 AM
What the heck does that mean? What “obvious problems” are you alluding to, and can you support that judgment with some facts?
BTW Are the commenters here aware of Thomas Sowell’s Black Rednecks and White Liberals? Sowell explores through his essays how Leftie-liberals have historically twisted black identity and fostered what he calls “self-destruction” caused by conflating ghetto culture with black identity.
onlineanalyst on January 11, 2010 at 7:26 AM
If I were a dark skinned negro with a strong negro dialect I would be highly offened. I’m sure we will be hearing from Sharpton and Jackson any second now.
ctmom on January 11, 2010 at 7:38 AM
This was all over the “approved” television media this morning…
I seriously don’t see how Harry Reid can survive this… If he stays on as Majority Leader, he’ll just get HAMMERED on this every day between now and election day… No way he’ll resign his seat, so that means he’ll STILL get hammered every day until election day…
Putting the senior Senator from NY in the Majority Leader spot might also scare everybody in flyover country, so that’s not a bad thing either…
Khun Joe on January 11, 2010 at 7:46 AM
Even Reid’s advisers are arrogant and out of touch. It couldn’t be that universal criticism is an indication that others are simply just acting on the facts. The truth is that the dems are elitists and have two different standards for what qualifies as racism.
csdeven on January 11, 2010 at 7:48 AM
Not sure if anyone caught it but, this morning on Fox&Friends, Al Sharpton actually said that Reid’s comments showed “support” for Obama during the campaign. My head almost exploded. What a d-bag.
milwife88 on January 11, 2010 at 7:52 AM
If Reid said it, then he meant it!
yoda on January 11, 2010 at 7:52 AM
Now that was funny. And it went right over his head.
davidk on January 11, 2010 at 7:54 AM
Reid can march to the Senate floor in white sheets and a hood and blacks wouldn’t care as long as he has that (D) behind his name and he’s handing out gov’t freebies. Al Sharpton’s reaction to Reid’s comments are a perfect example of this.
Jonah Goldberg is 100% correct. Crying racism isn’t going to get the Republicans a single black vote. Forget it. It’s the blatant and insideous double standard that Liberals practice day in and day out that will win votes……just not from negroes.
P.S.-Thanks Harry, for freeing up the usage of the word “negro” again! It’s even Al Sharpton-approved! ;-)
David2.0 on January 11, 2010 at 7:56 AM
Yet again, the Dems use the memory hole to change the reality.
I’m curious though, how does a statement that Obama is electable because he doesn’t shuck and jive like most black politicians support his candidacy? Further, if this was support, why was Reid so quick to apologize.
More Democrats should be apologizing for their support of Obama!
highhopes on January 11, 2010 at 7:58 AM
Over at “The Corner,” K-Lo cites the statement by Barbara Lee, speaking on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus re Reid’s statement:
This statement is wrong on so many levels. The progressive legislative agenda of the Democrats is harmful to all Americans, regardless of race, ethnicity, or gender, The impact of this agenda negatively affects the economy, job creation, and energy independence. The Democrat agenda, regardless of which aggrieved caucus is spouting off, engenders a growing dependent class and American decline for all.
onlineanalyst on January 11, 2010 at 7:59 AM
Sharpton was on FnF today and almost hurt himself protecting Reid and covering for these racist remarks. tried to divert fire toward billy jeff for the coffee snark.
ted c on January 11, 2010 at 8:01 AM
Double Standard…double standard…isn’t that a phrase meaning hypocrisy? That was Al Sharpton in action on the talk shows this morning.
kingsjester on January 11, 2010 at 8:05 AM
Again, Caddell and Horowitz make the point that it doesn’t matter how the rabid Lefties twist words and history, their goal is power. To their mind, Reid’s words have “distracted” from the Dem agenda of inflicting their “transformation” on the nation.
onlineanalyst on January 11, 2010 at 8:06 AM
i have a very dark skinned, heavy Negro dialect woman that works for me. If i showed her Reid’s remarks, she would say that a Republican made them up–that they were all a lie. and if I asked her why would Reid apologize for them if he didn’t utter them, she would say it is because he is a nice man.
this is the extent to which the Dems have brainwashed many people, especially blacks in poor Southern areas.
kelley in virginia on January 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM
From Drudge:
CBS ’60 MINUTES IGNORES HARRY REID ‘NEGRO’ REVELATION DURING INTERVIEW WITH ‘GAME CHANGE’ BOOK AUTHORS…
petefrt on January 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM
Please…you don’t want to get into this “here”, “here”, “here”, stuff….just give us an unbiased website, one not run by Mormon’s and let’s see what the real history is.
Next thing you know, you will have people actually quoting your founders, prophets, and apostles…
Here, here
Pretty apparent that pre-1978 “negroes” were not much use to the LDS….but nothing like a realization that society does not agree and suddenly, from the sky, a revelation…praise the Lord….
The church ended the ban with a four-paragraph statement released on June 8, 1978, that said ”every faithful, worthy man in the Church may receive the holy priesthood.
right2bright on January 11, 2010 at 8:13 AM
If someone has a double standard, you won’t ever convince them that it is a double standard.
The dems will never believe he was racist…until he looses and becomes a burden to the dems, then they will say he was a racist and that is why he lost.
The will throw him under the proverbial bus…meanwhile always likening him to a Republican.
That is the way true hypocrisy works…
right2bright on January 11, 2010 at 8:16 AM
I agree. Make the left defend Reid.
But the spineless Dumblicans will again roll over and ignore this. McCain is their model–let’s just all get along.
I’m not for milking this for political gain. I’m for driving this home to reveal the racism of the left and then make sure that we declare that anyone who supports this kind of white supremacist arrogance in word or deed (i.e. voting for such a person) is perpetuating the indecency of racism.
davidk on January 11, 2010 at 8:16 AM
Yes. +100
It is “loses”, not “looses”. Common mistake but it drives me nuts! ;-)
David2.0 on January 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM
Yeah, calling for his head is stupid, because the left uses this dirty tactic is the reason we should not. Just point out what the dems would say about a republican who said this and walk away from it.
conservnut on January 10, 2010 at 9:42 PM
—————
NO! This is how we lose elections – because we are unwilling to use the tactics that are so effectively used against us. The Democrats make the rules, so they should not b*tch when we make use of them.
fossten on January 11, 2010 at 8:31 AM
Reid and Bozo are both admitted racists by way of their own words, but they are held together by their ideology.
I agree with others who posted that the GOP must stop eating its own when they make minor mistakes as Lott did.
Do you all remember congressman jerry studs?
dogsoldier on January 11, 2010 at 8:39 AM
and the interesting out of this whole affair….dear leader comes out smelling like a rose in this book….hmmmmmmmmm
cmsinaz on January 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM
You know the most informative racist thing about Reid is he acknowledged Obama has a dialect he uses for his shuck and jive act when around or talking to other Negros.
When he is talking to whites, he uses his white dialect and tries to stay in their comfort zone, when talking to Negroes he uses their dialect and tries to stay in their comfort zone.
What a pres we have, transcending race. Yes I did notice that about Obama before Reid brought it up …
So does this make Negro is the proper PC word, instead of the really stupid hyphenated -American tag that liberals like so well. If I were and American and wanted to put forth that I am of African descent, why not just go back to Africa? I would be insulted if someone called me an Irish-American or Mexican-American or whatever, every time they spoke.
And how about this quote from Obama about Trent Lott in 2002:
Illinois Senator Barack Obama (D-13th), who hosted WVON’s Cliff Kelley Show, challenged the Republican Party to repudiate Lott’s remarks and to call for his resignation as senate leader.
“It seems to be that we can forgive a 100-year-old senator for some of the indiscretion of his youth, but, what is more difficult to forgive is the current president of the U.S. Senate (Lott) suggesting we had been better off if we had followed a segregationist path in this country after all of the battles and fights for civil rights and all the work that we still have to do,” — said Obama.
He said: “The Republican Party itself has to drive out Trent Lott. If they have to stand for something, they have to stand up and say this is not the person we want representing our party.” —said Obama.
–From the December 12, 2002 issue of the Chicago Defender.
Hey Lott didn’t even call anybody a name…
tarpon on January 11, 2010 at 8:57 AM
If Reid gets a pass from the person who his comments where directed at because of Ried’s great job performance, Ried has a big heart and that Reid and Obama are great friends then.. I ask Reid to say those comments again today.
Electrongod on January 11, 2010 at 9:08 AM
I’m watching Fax, @4:15 my time, some democrat, a person of minority stature, is making excuses for Reid saying; “what Reid said was awkward”.
This reminds me of how my irresponsible sister inlaw makes excuses for her out of control kids.
So, democrats are children and get a pass for misbehavior and republicans are held to a higher standard, being and adult.
OK, I’ll accept these standards as long as we get to punish the democrats. So, Jonah Goldberg, I wont yell, but I will demand satisfaction.
Kini on January 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM
Like Rush has said, “the agressor sets the rules”. Sadly, too many Republicans are content with acting to a higher standard than is expected of any Democrat. Bringing a knife to a gunfight again.
Extrafishy on January 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM
But Schumer (gag me) wants Harry’s job.
Connie on January 11, 2010 at 12:46 AM
—–
Can you see how this would play out?
I don’t see Schumer being nearly as effective as Reid has been. Reid at least has an idea about how to go about building a consensus, and doesn’t automatically run toward the media cameras – Schumer doesn’t appear to have a clue about this.
Mew
acat on January 11, 2010 at 9:30 AM
Related parody: Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid Introduces Resolution Celebrating Diversity in Sensitivity Standards http://www.optoons.blogspot.com/
Mervis Winter on January 11, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Leftists don’t care one whit about economic advancement.
They believe that the only way to achieve their dystopian fantasy of equality is to drag everyone down to the same base level.
They are the ultimate “racists” in the sense that they believe that a segment of society is incapable of rising.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Look at virtually any policy advanced by the left.
You will see that it is never about raising someone up but rather tearing someone down.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Thoughtcrime doubleplusungood.
Bugler on January 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Leftists are destroyers, not builders.
Their psyche is tormented by their own greed and envy, which they project onto others.
They therefore have a very dim view of humanity.
Scratch just a little bit beneath the surface of their addled brains, and you will find that their ultimate concept of utopia would be a world without humans.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 10:16 AM
That doesn’t make any sense.
They’re are a lot of scientific classifications of a lot of things. Whats your point supposed to be?
“Scientifically”, there is one race…the human race.
Ethnicity is also a “scientific” term, and is more to the point imo.
Itchee Dryback on January 11, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Maybe Harry would be happy if Pinnochio borrowed Hillary’s Negro dialec didn’t she say something about “That Thar road to Faaar” or something?
Maybe someone has a link to Hillary doin her Negro thing. I won’t get banned for this comment will I?
dhunter on January 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM
I don’t really think the comments should be sufficient to force any political leader to step down (though I don’t think that they were good comments by any means), but I think making a bit of a farce of it points out the hypocrisy.
Count to 10 on January 11, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Want to look into the darkness of the leftist mind?
Suggest to your favorite leftist the following scenario.
Somewhere on earth- let’s say an island somewhere- there is a happy little thriving capitalist society.
The little island society is completely unto itself with no interaction at all with the outside world.
The leftist’s first thought would be that that is unfair (a thought ultimately rooted in their own greed and envy). And rather than trying to emulate that society, they would begin to think of reasons and ways to infiltrate it and destroy it.
Leftists are the ultimate racists.
They view blacks as inferiors who are permanently off the island.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM
And, OMG, just imagine the leftist’s fury were they to discover some blacks living happily on that island- that totally upsets their worldview and rationale for destroying the island.
Think Clarence Thomas, Condie Rice, Thomas Sowell, Armstrong Williams, Michael Steele.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 10:53 AM
As a corollary, this is in part why we see the strange support and defense of Reid by Obama and Sharpton.
They reinforce and confirm each other’s worst views of each other.
They are the Yin and Yang of leftism.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM
OK.
I’m done ranting for today.
Carry on.
justltl on January 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM
I agree, but its not just blacks, its minorities in general. They have more freedom of action also imo. The pendulum of “equality” has swung in one direction for too long, and a person would nave to be willfully blind to not see this in many of the whinings found in the menu of victims groups and the idiotic legislation and accompanying case law that has been established.
What a tragic waste of a societies energy and resources.
Itchee Dryback on January 11, 2010 at 11:21 AM
trent lott is not an apt analogue for what ried said. (the correct analogue for what lott said was what dodd said when he said that robert byrd was right about the civil war.) the correct analogue for what reid said which reveals the double standard is the nontroversy over this guy: http://washingtonindependent.com/73036/n-word-sign-dogs-would-be-tea-party-leadernote that his sign isn\’t a racial attack on black people, but a clumsy analogy which makes a moral equation between the powerlessness of taxpayers under the duress of government and a slave under the duress of the plantation foreman. progressives have sought to portray the sign as if it\’s moral content were the simple abuse of blacks by ignoring the moral content of the sign. now progressives want us to look past the racial semiotics of what reid said to consider that he didn\’t exactly say that he himself thought it would be worse for the president if her were more \”authentically\” black\”, only that \”some\” in the electorate might be assuaged by his light-skintone. which, as brit notes, is more of a smear against the electorate than obama. sorry. cannot comply. the sign guy is far from the only example of this kind of \”that sounds racist, therefor is racist\” attack. when you set spite aside though, one can\’t helpo but be disturbed that reid is speaking a version of the old \”secret jew\” canard.
eh on January 12, 2010 at 2:02 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4