Napolitano’s surprise at AQ “determination,” and other confidence builders

posted at 12:15 pm on January 8, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Barack Obama repaired some of the damage done to the confidence in his administration on terrorism with a sharp, no-nonsense statement that finally accepted responsibility for the systemic failure that allowed the EunuchBomber onto Northwest 253 on Christmas Day.  Unfortunately, the people he appointed to run the effort did their best to undermine that confidence once again.  Let’s start with the Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, who apparently couldn’t be bothered to fact-check his statement to the media before releasing it, courtesy of Jake Tapper and Luis Martinez of ABC:

“That Mr. Abdulmutallab boarded Northwest Flight 153 for Detroit was a failure of the counterterrorism system,” the Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis Blair (ret.), said in a statement last night.

Of course, it was Northwest Flight 253, not 153.

Does that seem nitpicky?  Don’t forget that it was a misspelling of Umar Abdulmutallab’s name that kept the intelligence analysts from initially connecting the dots on his attack.  As this failure demonstrates so amply, intelligence is about paying attention to the details.  What does it say when the man in charge doesn’t get the basic details right in a prepared statement?

And again from Tapper, the report itself prepared by John Brennan has a glaring error:

Still, the review lacked basic information that anyone with access to abcnews.com could have already known.

Except of course the detail, on page three of the review, that Abdulmutallab’s father visited the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to warn the U.S. about his son’s extremist behavior on November 18.

That’s because that detail is wrong. That visit was on the 19th.

If they want us to feel like they’re taking this more seriously, it would help if they actually would take it more seriously. Yesterday morning, the administration was preparing everyone for the “shock” we would feel when we actually read the report, which they already had written … or so we thought.  As Tapper reports in that link, they continued to rewrite it to take more information out, until all that was left was a rehash of media reports and the admissions of screwing up.  And they managed to be less accurate than the media.

Unfortunately, Janet Napolitano oversold the serious approach during yesterday’s press conference by apparently admitting that she hadn’t paid much attention to AQ for the past eight years (transcript from Chicago Sun-Times and FR):

Question: What was the most shocking, stunning thing that you found out of the review? And, Secretary, to you, as well.

MR. BRENNAN: Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is an extension of al Qaeda core coming out of Pakistan. And, in my view, it is one of the most lethal and one of the most concerning of it. The fact that they had moved forward to try to execute this attack against the homeland I think demonstrated to us — and this is what the review sort of uncovered — that we had a strategic sense of sort of where they were going, but we didn’t know they had progressed to the point of actually launching individuals here. And we have taken that lesson, and so now we’re full on top of it.

SECRETARY NAPOLITANO: I think, following up on that, not just the determination of al Qaeda and al Qaeda Arabian Peninsula, but the tactic of using an individual to foment an attack, as opposed to a large conspiracy or a multi-person conspiracy such as we saw in 9/11, that is something that affects intelligence. It really emphasizes now the renewed importance on how different intelligence is integrated and analyzed, and threat streams are followed through. And, again, it will impact how we continue to review the need to improve airport security around the world.

Lady Logician says this deserves the Captain Louis Renault Award for Napolitano’s shock, shock! that AQ is determined to keep attacking the West … literal shock, in this case, by her admission. Did we really just start thinking about single-person attacks — if indeed, that’s what this was — in 2010? Was that concept really so shocking for our national security staff? That’s not exactly a confidence builder, is it?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Okay, once again, now in the RIGHT thread:

From a previous thread:

Napolitano: “What, you mean that there are people out there that want to kill Americans? And what’s this Al Qee….Al Quar….Al….Qerda?”

FFS, get some competent individuals in charge. Starting with the President (since, you know….”the buck stops [t]here”).

7 years of safety. Less than one under a new regime administration, and we barely avoid our first.

CatsGodot on January 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM

She shocked? WTH? Where was she when 9/11 happened? Mars? For crying out loud, anyone who isn’t dead from the neck up should know without a shadow of a doubt that there ARE terrorists and THEY DO want to KILL us. milwife88 on January 8, 2010 at 12:23 PM

Which is why I suggest that she gets the first Capt Louis Renault Award. Anyone who is shocked at that…..

Thanks for the linky love Ed!

LL

Lady Logician on January 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Maybe we should demand that these people stop receiving a pay check…

… then maybe they might take their jobs seriously.

Seven Percent Solution on January 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Someone should force B.O. to get on national TV and attempt to explain to the nation exactly what it was that inspired him to make this absolutely totally with a clue idiot in desperate need of a village the head of the Department of Home(r)land Security (DOHS!)

pilamaye on January 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM

“Al-Qaeda determined to strike in US”
Sounds familiar….
BobMbx on January 8, 2010

Yes!
It came from a 1998 CIA briefing to President Clinton following the failed Aug. 20, 1998, cruise missile attack, which President Clinton claimed was in retaliation for terrorist attacks on two U.S. embassies in Africa.

Later it became the title of a summarized historical briefings of all AQ/OBL threats against the USA.

After the 911 commission it became A clarion call for the useful idiots and their puppet masters.

If you look it up you will find the summarized historical briefing was on Aug, 6, 2001 yet the “actual” “specific” CIA briefing titled “Al-Qaeda determined to strike in US” will be listed as “an August briefing” leaving out that little detail like the year of this “August briefing” .

It’s amazing some people are still dumb enough to fall for that ya think?

DSchoen on January 8, 2010 at 4:06 PM

MayBee on January 8,

Not ta mention the recruiting station in Little Rock and Ford Hood. Now after the attempted Xmass bomber?

Granted, getting rid of one person will not “fix” this.

How every, when ya got someone this dense in a leadership management position they gotta go,

lives literally depend on it.

DSchoen on January 8, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Yesterday morning, the administration was preparing everyone for the “shock” we would feel when we actually read the report, which they already had written …

What I want to know is what was rewritten out of the report that would have been as shocking as they, the ‘insiders’, thought enough of to try to prepare us for it. Did they actually have the Eunuch Bombers’ name and location, and perhaps even his travel plans, prior to December 25th?

KendraWilder on January 8, 2010 at 4:25 PM

Someone should force B.O. to get on national TV and attempt to explain to the nation exactly what it was that inspired him to make this absolutely totally with a clue idiot in desperate need of a village the head of the Department of Home(r)land Security (DOHS!)

It’s cear she is part of the celebrate diversity bean counter’s quota.

wepeople on January 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM

Comment pages: 1 2