It begins: Federal judge tosses Gitmo detainee’s confession as coerced

posted at 8:25 pm on January 8, 2010 by Allahpundit

Via JWF, the canary in the coal mine keels over.

In a ruling this week, U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan also said the government failed to establish that 23 statements the detainee made to interrogators at Guantanamo Bay were untainted by the earlier coerced statements made while he was held under harsh conditions in Afghanistan.

However, the judge said statements he made during two military administrative hearings at the U.S. detention center in Cuba, where he was assisted by a personal representative, were reliable and sufficient to justify holding the detainee…

The logical inference from the record, said the judge, is that interrogators at Guantanamo Bay reviewed Al Madhwani’s coerced confessions with him and asked him to make identical confessions…

Despite Hogan’s concerns about the 23 statements, the judge relied on other evidence and three statements Al Madhwani made to a military tribunal and a review board to conclude that he trained, traveled and associated with members of al-Qaida, including high-level operatives. On those grounds, the judge ruled he is legally detained.

Ace is angry but I think he’s forgetting that Obama has basically rigged these trials from the get-go with his two-tiered approach to detainees. Remember? When he’s got a bunch of evidence on someone such that the confession is basically unnecessary, they go to federal court so that The One can boast about due process. When he doesn’t have much evidence besides the confession, they go to a military tribunal so that the confession can be admitted into evidence and he can boast about the eventual conviction. It’s a sham, and it’s crowned by the fact that he’s all but promised to keep dangerous detainees imprisoned even if they’re acquitted, but that’s the game he’s decided he wants to play. Frankly, we could use more of these test cases before the KSM trial gets going: If he and Holder miscalculate and end up sending some low-level jihadi to federal court on the assumption that they can get a conviction even if the confession’s thrown out, and then the defendant is freed, the uproar will be such that he’ll have to rethink his whole stupid KSM strategy.

Via Greg Hengler, a gloss from Krauthammer.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

It’s the precedent stupid! KSM’s statements are already thrown out.

uknowmorethanme on January 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM

Holder and Obama have already said they’re not releasing them even if they get a hung jury or acquitted. Which begs to question, if they’re not going to follow the rule of law fully, what’s the purpose of this show trial?

Oh, right… to prosecute the Bush Administration through the defense attorneys.

Enoxo on January 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM

Let me be clear. Make no mistake. The system worked.

Drained Brain on January 8, 2010 at 8:33 PM

Pretty soon the terrorists will have more rights than we will. I hope none of thses idiots are allowed to go free or things will really be messed up.

Brat4life on January 8, 2010 at 8:33 PM

We’re screwed.

Emily M. on January 8, 2010 at 8:34 PM

It is a sham. A dog and pony show, bait and switch, hoodwinked, whatever description you prefer. Obama is the judge and jury on each case. The constitutional law professor is making a mockery of our judicial system. Whatever suits the emperor.

conservative pilgrim on January 8, 2010 at 8:34 PM

Predicted, expected. Can’t wait for the finale. Could be fun.

Skandia Recluse on January 8, 2010 at 8:34 PM

People are not going to like this – not one bit.

Just when I think they might have a clue – then I realize they don’t.

gophergirl on January 8, 2010 at 8:35 PM

Didn’t see this coming.

/lib

LibTired on January 8, 2010 at 8:35 PM

The buck stops….where, again?

CatsGodot on January 8, 2010 at 8:35 PM

This is becoming a nightmare. Dude, this is genius. Give the Democrats unbridled power and watch them show their ineptness in record time making the people thankful to vote Republican in ’10 and ’12.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 8:37 PM

The buck stops….where, again?

CatsGodot on January 8, 2010 at 8:35 PM

Under the table into the hands of a crooked judge.

SouthernGent on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

I only wish that the White House would go after terrorists the way they go after Fox News and Rush Limbaugh and conservatives.
A terrorist tries to blow up a plane and it took the President three days to respond but when he gets criticized by Rush Limbaugh or Glen Beck the response is immediate and harsh.
It didn’t take the White House three days to respond when Sarah Palin made the death panels comment.

NeoKong on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

And this is a surprise to whom, exactly?

SlaveDog on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

Obama is done.

Razorsully on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

Pure insanity. Obama should get impeached and jailed for this insane decision.

BottomLine5 on January 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM

No sh**. Why is this a surprise? These criminals (I mean the administration, not the terrorists) are going to put the last administration on trial one way or another and if this dog and pony doesn’t work they’ve got interpol.

ORconservative on January 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM

OT…..Scott Brown is on Hannity tonight.

Knucklehead on January 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM

Obama is done.

Razorsully on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

Let me be more clear..He will not get more re-elected due to this mess.

Razorsully on January 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM

bama is a lying worthless turd, nuff said!!!

jgdp on January 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM

h/t Rush

Start spreading the news, I’m leaving today
I’m gonna be a part of it – new york, New York
These explosive-filled shoes, are longing to stray
Right through the very heart of it – New York, New York

I wanna wake up in the city I made to weep,
And find I’m king of that hill – the World Trade Center heap

These Gitmo blues, are melting away
I’ll make a brand new mess of it – in old New York
If I can get you there, I’ll get you anywhere
It’s up to you – New York, New York

uknowmorethanme on January 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM

Politically, this is going to fun to watch.

d1carter on January 8, 2010 at 8:41 PM

You’re right, it is fun to watch but I’m no where near NYC.

ORconservative on January 8, 2010 at 8:42 PM

I’m not a religious person but I will pray that KSM is freed. Only for the spectacle that will ensue on msnbc trying to spin it.

Oh dear Allah (PBUH) free KSM, pretty please.

angryed on January 8, 2010 at 8:42 PM

Judge Thomas Hogan also said the government failed to establish that 23 statements the detainee made to interrogators at Guantanamo Bay were untainted by the earlier coerced statements made while he was held under harsh conditions in Afghanistan.

Remind me as to how a person can Prove a Negative again.

ronnyraygun on January 8, 2010 at 8:45 PM

Allah, I bet you a Dominos pizza one of these guys walk. There’s a liberal juror somewhere pissed at the Bush Administration enough to set an example by letting Ahmed Bin Khalid al Mohammed Bin Abdul walk free.

amerpundit on January 8, 2010 at 8:50 PM

I thought the people behind the 911 plot wanted to die. Get your cyanide capsules here!

Oh wait, you mean Obama & Holder want to spend upwards to $400 million dollars to have the world see us 911 plotters go to trial in a US courthouse. On second thought, we’ll be glad to put those capsules on hold. We’ll be happy to go ahead and wait all those years that is required to see if we can get acquitted first.

Americannodash on January 8, 2010 at 8:50 PM

The judge made the right decision. No statement exacted from an individual under arrest without being given right to counsel or advised of his right against self-incrimination should be admissible in a criminal case in a US court.

The solution of course is not to bring the cases in US criminal courts at all. Keep these people out of the country, either in Afghan or Gitmo, extract all the info they have, conduct some kind of quasi judicial military tribunal hearing then shoot them or hang them (their choice).

My question is: Does Obama want to use these proceedings to weaken the Constitution? Does he want judges to be pressured into admitting these coerced statements into evidence, thereby undermining the strength of the Constitution which is the only limit on governmental power?

Ted Torgerson on January 8, 2010 at 8:51 PM

So for $400 million, the American taxpayer gets some so-so kabuki theater.

GnuBreed on January 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM

As I posted at Ace, I think that this is a win for us.
.
Al Madhwani is unimportant; even if he’s returned to Pakistan later today, I’m ok with that. Odds are he’ll reappear soon enough, in the view of some US military optics, as some of his associates have, and with the expected result.
.
But unless Al Madhwani is convicted and severely, sentenced, such that he won’t be out in less than 25 years, then BO loses. Any other outcome, and BO loses. Big.
.
At some point, someone (I’m guessing Axelrod) will see this, and convince BO to send KSM and the rest back to Gitmo, and make certain no other enemy combatants get access to US civilian courts.
.
I see this as a (potentialy very big/strategic)win:
– enemy combatants are treated as such (even if most are never tried and only detained for the duration of hostilities),
– US Citizens (and only US Citizens) enjoy the protection that US laws afford US Citizens here in the US,
– Lawyers are unable to force bad decisions/laws upon us,
– Lawyers make no money from this situation.

Arbalest on January 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM

It didn’t take the White House three days to respond when Sarah Palin made the death panels comment.
NeoKong on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

Remember they awoke Obama immediately when he won the Nobel, yet waited three hours to inform him of this terrorist attack. They have priorities and national security/terrorism is NOT one of them. http://bit.ly/6IYm9O

conservative pilgrim on January 8, 2010 at 8:57 PM

My dad just pointed out something. If one of these guys is acquited in court but the Administration yanks the person back into military custody all it takes is a writ of Habeas Corpus and Obama’s refusal to follow the Rule of Law to get cited for Contempt of Court which fall into the category of High-Crime or Misdemeanor which is an Impeachable Offense.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 8:58 PM

We have got to fight the premise that non US citizens in foreign countries making war against the US have constitutional protection. If KSM is convicted and appeals it, I think a conservative justice must vote to throw out the conviction, and I think liberal justices will have their own reasons to reverse it. I think this will be a half-billion dollar trial that will ultimately have its verdict overturned and thrown back to the military courts.

Buddahpundit on January 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM

B+

csdeven on January 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Obama’s refusal to follow the Rule of Law to get cited for Contempt of Court which fall into the category of High-Crime or Misdemeanor which is an Impeachable Offense.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 8:58 PM

As Clinton proved just being impeached doesn’t necessarily mean than one will be removed from office. He committed perjury and not enough Senators saw fit to convict him of the articles of impeachment against him. Side note Fred didn’t vote to convict.

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Kangaroo court.

cobrakai99 on January 8, 2010 at 9:05 PM

When he doesn’t have much evidence besides the confession, they go to a military tribunal so that the confession can be admitted into evidence and he can boast about the eventual conviction.

I wouldn’t be so sure about this. I would not put it past Janack Obamitano and his thugs to let a bad case go to a military tribunal just to discredit them.

91Veteran on January 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM

Under the table into the hands of a crooked judge.

SouthernGent on January 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM

The whole process is crooked. If the judge was straight he’d throw the entire case out and order the “suspect” released, (and compensated), because he probably wasn’t read his Miranda rights.

FloatingRock on January 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM

This is bound to be a trend . . . Obama’s incompetent bungling will cause everyone of these killers to be released back to the streets. These are sad and dangerous times we live in.

rplat on January 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM

True but Conservatives shouldn’t have pushed that entire impeachment thing.

This would be far different, violation of the Constitution, violation of Civil Liberties, contempt of court, false imprisonment and the like.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:11 PM

AG Eric Holder’s law firm, Covington & Burling, represents 17 Yemenis currently held at Gitmo.

Meanwhile: Navy SEALs Face Assault Charges for Capturing Most-Wanted Terrorist

We have gone very, very badly off the rails in this country.

Django on January 8, 2010 at 9:12 PM

Elections matter

He doesnt care and we’re stuck with him for another 3 years.

thebrokenrattle on January 8, 2010 at 9:13 PM

Start spreading the news, I’m leaving today
I’m gonna be a part of it – new york, New York
These explosive-filled shoes, are longing to stray
Right through the very heart of it – New York, New York

I wanna wake up in the city I made to weep,
And find I’m king of that hill – the World Trade Center heap

These Gitmo blues, are melting away
I’ll make a brand new mess of it – in old New York
If I can get you there, I’ll get you anywhere
It’s up to you – New York, New York

that is one of the funniest song parodies rush has ever done.

anybody have a link to listen to it? im dying to hear it again

sidewinder22 on January 8, 2010 at 9:14 PM

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:11 PM

Why shouldn’t Clinton’s impeachment for perjury been pushed?

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:14 PM

Hogaaaaaaaan!

JohnW on January 8, 2010 at 9:14 PM

You now have positive undeniable proof that it is a gross mistake of absolute epic proportions to have any of these Gitmo goons tried in a civilian court.

Each and every one of them shoulf be tried in a military tribunal as the war criminals that they are!

Idiots like B.O. and Holder are opening up a gigantic can of worms here if they continue to delude themselves into believing that these clowns can be tried just as common criminals.

Criminals they clearly are, but they are a far far cry from being common!

pilamaye on January 8, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Obama’s incompetent bungling will cause everyone of these killers to be released back to the streets.

rplat on January 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM

And conversely it’s also dangerous if they aren’t released back onto the streets because it would set a powerful precedent in support of kangaroo courts that may be abused in the future, as leftist governments have so often done in the past.

FloatingRock on January 8, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Hey I know. Let’s reconstitute the O.J. jury.

darwin-t on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Why shouldn’t Clinton’s impeachment for perjury been pushed?

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:14 PM

Because it was all about Clinton getting his knob slobbered on. Doesn’t matter what he infact did, that was the public perception.

Really perjury about oral sex doesn’t rise to the level of say bribing Congresscritters.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Read High Crimes and Misdemeanors by Ann Coulter and the tell me that his impeachment was about knob slobbery.

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM

all part of the plan….

Nothing to see here, just further proof that Obama is a lying Marxist plant and Holder is a tool of a tool.

44th President of the United States? Obama’s BlackBerry.

PappyD61 on January 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM

Obama finally said we’re at war, he just didn’t tell all the truth and say that he’s on al-qaeda’ side!
Barack Hussein Obama is waging jihad against America!

DougDavis on January 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM

Time to die…………

dmann on January 8, 2010 at 9:34 PM

This is becoming a nightmare. Dude, this is genius. Give the Democrats unbridled power and watch them show their ineptness in record time making the people thankful to vote Republican in ‘10 and ‘12.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 8:37 PM

They’re sure making it easier on the GOP. I just hope we have something left after we get back in control.

Oink on January 8, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Holder and Obama have already said they’re not releasing them even if they get a hung jury or acquitted.

Like it matters what Obama said yesterday?

JellyToast on January 8, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Because it was all about Clinton getting his knob slobbered on. Doesn’t matter what he infact did, that was the public perception.

Really perjury about oral sex doesn’t rise to the level of say bribing Congresscritters.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Why is this so difficult to understand even after all this time? Perjury is perjury. A lie under oath IS a lie under oath. I don’t care if they’re asking about bribes or sex. I don’t believe there are degrees or levels of lies. Lie in the 1st degree vs. Lie in the 4th degree. That doesn’t exist in the court of law. They take that whole “do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” stuff pretty seriously.

Oink on January 8, 2010 at 9:40 PM

Eric Holder seems strangely absent. Is he still off skiing somewhere:

GarandFan on January 8, 2010 at 9:41 PM

Smart Power.

Itchee Dryback on January 8, 2010 at 9:42 PM

Entirely predictable, and completely irrelevant to the ultimate outcome of these trials.

Show trials, FTW.

BadgerHawk on January 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM

dmann on January 8, 2010 at 9:34 PM

The Replicants have won. When do they expire?

Itchee Dryback on January 8, 2010 at 9:50 PM

These trials are just a way to keep Bush in the spotlight as long as possible in order to use him as an election ploy, but it will backfire if another terrorist attack is successful because of course, Bush kept the US safe.

royzer on January 8, 2010 at 9:51 PM

Nice work, Barry. With a president like you, who needs terrorists?

califcon on January 8, 2010 at 9:59 PM

that is one of the funniest song parodies rush has ever done.

anybody have a link to listen to it? im dying to hear it again

sidewinder22 on January 8, 2010 at 9:14 PM

I linked it in the post.

uknowmorethanme on January 8, 2010 at 10:06 PM

If KSM is found “innocent” and Holder and Obama continue to keep them in confinement (as a matter of public safety and all that) they will be violating the Constitution. Period.

Once this precedent has been established, what is to prevent this Administration, or any future Administration, from holding “innocent” persons in confinement indefinitely at any point in the future?

I’ve seen no reasoned response to that very simple question of law and Constitutionality.

Change we can believe in? Yeah, right…

coldwarrior on January 8, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Just curious: Is Holder’s former law firm representing the Detroit crotch bomber?

Another aside, this one from today’s “Best of the Web,” re the closing of Gitmo:

Obama’s promise (to transfer detainees out of Gitmo) has run up against reality in several different ways. The revelation that former detainees now based in Yemen were involved in planning the Christmas attack in Detroit prompted the administration to announce a halt to repatriation of Yemenis. (In fairness, we hasten to note that the ex-detainees who rejoined the fight were released while George W. Bush was president.) It turns out there really are terrorists at Guantanamo–who knew?

Well, Democrats in Congress knew (though who knew they knew?). Isikoff reports that the administration cannot legally carry out its plan to move detainees to Illinois’s Thomson Correctional Center:

The administration is already blocked from moving any Guantánamo detainees to the U.S. for purposes other than putting them on trial. That’s the result of a rider to a congressional appropriations bill that passed overwhelmingly last spring and which expires Sept. 30.

In order to move the Yemenis and other Gitmo detainees to Thomson, the administration needs to persuade the Congress to lift the rider–in an election year, no less–a much more difficult task when the proposal is to move more than 100 detainees to the U.S. rather than 20 or 30.

Opposition to Obama’s terrorist-importation plan is bipartisan, notes Isikoff: “If Republicans make big gains in the fall elections, as many analysts now predict, the odds of lifting the anti-Gitmo rider would become even steeper.”

onlineanalyst on January 8, 2010 at 10:15 PM

Just overheard some discussion on CNN concerning these upcoming “trials” that led me to produce this question:

What, and how are the folks in Illinois going to feel when Bin Laden is captured and housed in the “new Gitmo”?

Rovin on January 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM

Rovin on January 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM

A larger question, how are the families of the guards at the Illinois prison going to feel after they are identified by the ACLU?

Beslan in Illinois comes to mind. Lots of unprotected schools in that part of the world. Or individual families? Just takes one family being held hostage by domestic AQ followers and this Administration would allow AQ detainees a plane ride out of the country.

As for bin Laden…he’ll be dead long before he allows himself to be captured.

coldwarrior on January 8, 2010 at 10:25 PM

Above Obama’s pay grade.

Johan Klaus on January 8, 2010 at 10:27 PM

You know…

One of these days a ‘Judge’ will make a decision that will put the rest of us, and our families in danger, and ‘we’ as the ‘angry mob’ are going to say with the utmost respect:


“FU%K YOU!”

Seven Percent Solution on January 8, 2010 at 10:27 PM

What, and how are the folks in Illinois going to feel when Bin Laden is captured and housed in the “new Gitmo”?

Rovin on January 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM

Bin laden is housed in rocks at Tora Bora.

Johan Klaus on January 8, 2010 at 10:30 PM

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Read High Crimes and Misdemeanors by Ann Coulter and the tell me that his impeachment was about knob slobbery.

thomasaur on January 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM

…or read the book SELLOUT by David Shippers. Clinton was a thug, and the Republicans in the Senate didn’t have the guts to do their duty.

91Veteran on January 8, 2010 at 10:39 PM

PS. David Shippers was a life long Democrat.

91Veteran on January 8, 2010 at 10:42 PM

These trials are just a way to keep Bush in the spotlight as long as possible in order to use him as an election ploy, but it will backfire if another terrorist attack is successful because of course, Bush kept the US safe.

royzer on January 8, 2010 at 9:51 PM

Uh…there’s been 4 since Janack Obamitano was immaculated.

The two recruits killed outside the recruiting center in the south….Arkansas IIRC.

The guy who left the bomb outside the office building in? Dallas? Houston?

Hasan and Ft. Hood.

The panty bomber.

91Veteran on January 8, 2010 at 10:46 PM

Already done, Seven%. The O’phony is exposed and America is not the Berlin ghetto of 1937. Bring it on if you dare.

Or otherwise, Constitution. small government and low taxes.

Caststeel on January 8, 2010 at 10:47 PM

It’s a sham,

Sham WOW! 1-20-09 to 1-20-13, Can we please cancel this idiotmercial?

bluemarlin on January 8, 2010 at 10:55 PM

Had the interesting experience of sharpening my 40-year-old pitchfork. It was not dull. Moved manure and soiled bedding very well.
Just decided the 2010 manure would move easier with piercing. Knew I kept this tool from rural NC to Pasadena for a reason. Call it conservation.

Caststeel on January 8, 2010 at 11:05 PM

all it takes is a writ of Habeas Corpus and Obama’s refusal to follow the Rule of Law to get cited for Contempt of Court which fall into the category of High-Crime or Misdemeanor which is an Impeachable Offense.

Holger

Good luck with that. Democrats control both houses of of congress.

xblade on January 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM

coldwarrior on January 8, 2010 at 10:25 PM

Wouldn’t even have to be the ACLU. All someone has to do is wait for a shift change and follow them home.

And all that is mentioned is money to buy the prison. I haven’t heard them mention money to improve school security, road security, Miss River security, train security, Nuke facility security, etc etc etc.

journeyintothewhirlwind on January 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM

Federal judge tosses Gitmo detainee’s confession as coerced

Well duh.

boomer on January 8, 2010 at 11:53 PM

This administration is the very definition of “shovel-ready”.

The similarities to a heap of manure are piling up.

hillbillyjim on January 8, 2010 at 11:57 PM

Itchee Dryback on January 8, 2010 at 9:50 PM
We haven’t started to fight, there will be no tears in the rain………..

dmann on January 9, 2010 at 12:03 AM

They have to get a conviction. They have no choice. If they fail to convict it will be a terrible blow to the Democrats.

DFCtomm on January 9, 2010 at 12:18 AM

and then the defendant is freed,

They will have to provide 24/7 security otherwise not even Vegas will give odds on how long he lives.

chemman on January 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM

Get enough blacks on the jury and I’ll give you 10 to 1 Abdulmutallab walks a la OJ Simpson …

PaulMorphy on January 9, 2010 at 12:46 AM

Because it was all about Clinton getting his knob slobbered on. Doesn’t matter what he infact did, that was the public perception.

Really perjury about oral sex doesn’t rise to the level of say bribing Congresscritters.

Holger on January 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Yeah, because when people misunderstand something, it’s impossible to ever correct it. Much better to just lie down and let the liars roll all over you.

Wait, what?

Merovign on January 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM

PaulMorphy on January 9, 2010 at 12:46 AM
Math….well done!

dmann on January 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM

this is not necessarily a bad thing. By this happening now the public’s going to get nervous, and as each little ruling falls into place, people will start getting serious anxiety, and the election will occur during the perfect storm. Better to sacrifice this terrorist (on the alter of political correctness, that is) rather than endure the KSM trials.

And the financial situation isn’t going to help.

CSK on January 9, 2010 at 3:12 AM

This is exactly what I predicted.

Obama will be dog meat if this goes to a military tribunal.

drjohn on January 9, 2010 at 6:46 AM

The worst President at the worst time.

albill on January 9, 2010 at 7:44 AM

The end of Barack Obama’s political career can’t come soon enough for me. Setting terrorists free should just about do it.

Kafir on January 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM

We need to find 12 terrorist to be the jury of his peers.

Ed Laskie on January 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM

“the uproar will be such that he’ll have to rethink his whole stupid KSM strategy get the hell out of office.”

FIF-Us

Obama=AmINO (American In Name Only)

WordsMatter on January 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM

And this process is supposed to show Al Qaeda and the jihadis what a compassionate nation we are?
GTFO! Watch this backfire and create more successful terrorist attacks, since they are aware of more details of America’s internal mechanizations.
Thanks, and a shout out to the Prince of Incompetence, in the White House.

Cybergeezer on January 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM

Comment pages: 1 2