GOP aides warn RNC: It’s time for Steele to shut up

posted at 9:20 pm on January 7, 2010 by Allahpundit

Dude, he’s gone rogue.

Although RNC Research Director Jeff Berkowitz originally defended the campaign committee and Steele, aides ultimately acknowledged that they have little control over the former Maryland lieutenant governor and that they are not in charge of lining up his media appearances while he is promoting his book.

“Their response was, ‘We’re not booking the book stuff,’” a second GOP Senate aide said. And while RNC staff said they would try to get Steele “back on message,” this Senate aide said the frustration goes well beyond Steele’s latest statement [that the GOP can't take back the House this year], charging that he is using his position at the RNC to line his own pockets rather than raise much-needed campaign cash.

“Republicans at all levels have been working day and night to build a wave, and every time we turn around the guy standing on the surfboard is busy trying to collect admission to watch him ride,” the aide said, arguing that “he has an agenda of his own that isn’t reflected by the goals of the party as a whole.”

Republicans said there’s a growing concern that Steele is catering to conservative activists and others who may not have the party’s best interests at heart. Steele mounted an unsuccessful bid for Senate in 2006, running as a moderate.

He’s talking like he’s some kind of tea partier … when [in 2006] he was THE most moderate candidate we had in the field. That was his whole thing, and he had no problem trashing [former President George W.] Bush and others for being too conservative,” one GOP aide said.

So wait. The concern on the Hill isn’t with the fact that he’s going around telling his critics to get a life and saying moronic things about how he’s not sure the GOP’s ready to lead? Rather, the concern is over the way he’s … downplaying expectations at a moment of political uncertainty and trying to coopt a political movement that’s now polling better than both major parties? Suddenly it’s painfully clear to me why the GOP is where it is. Meanwhile, the Wash Times reported earlier today that some big donors are so fed up with him that they’re boycotting donations to the RNC going forward and sticking to Republican congressional and state fundraising instead. Again, his self-promotion seems to be the sticking point:

“I am not here to beat up on an RNC chairman,” former Republican National Committee Chairman Jim Nicholson told The Times, “because I know how big and important the job is and what opportunities can be created.”

“But that is just the point – under those circumstances, I do not see how a chairman can do book tours and give speeches for fees that go to him and not the RNC, which needs more money badly,” said Mr. Nicholson, who was President George W. Bush’s secretary of veterans affairs.

“You cannot serve two masters in that job,” Mr. Nicholson said. “I think when elected, you agree to give the RNC and its mission 100 percent of your efforts.”

Presumably the next misstep will end with some sort of coup attempt by RNC members. Exit question: What’s Steele’s game here? I can’t quite believe he’s doing all this simply to sell books. Having a prominent role in the party is worth more to him long term than any royalties he’ll earn now. Is he trying to ingratiate himself with tea partiers ahead of some future run for office? Because, judging from our commenters, he’s got a long way to go.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Having a prominent role in the party is worth more to him long term than any royalties he’ll earn now.

And having a founding role in a new party is worth more than a long term role in a dying party. I think going rogue may be exactly what he’s doing, along with Palin and Perry and a load of others.

phelps on January 8, 2010 at 2:43 AM

Token B has done all he was hired to do– time go bro.

leftnomore on January 8, 2010 at 3:28 AM

Fire Steele, he isn’t getting it done.

gdonovan on January 8, 2010 at 4:27 AM

He also needs to wipe that shite eatin’ grin off his face!

galvestonian on January 8, 2010 at 6:26 AM

AP, Steele has no plan. You are giving him too much credit. He’s behaving too stupidly for someone with a plan.

He may very well be a nice guy, I’ll trust Ed’s take on that, but he’s embarrassing and ineffective.

The RNC needs real leadership that knows how to organize the party (digitally as well. The RNC has no internet forum? Whats up with that? Even my state chapter has no means of communication except to spam email.) and vet candidates. And vet them they must.

Why hasn’t the RNC helped Scott Brown? Near as I can tell they haven’t done anything at all!

dogsoldier on January 8, 2010 at 6:30 AM

Republicans said there’s a growing concern that Steele is catering to conservative activists and others who may not have the party’s best interests at heart.

Screw you “Republicans”. Conservatives have America’s best interests at heart. To Hell with the “party”.

As for Steele, I haven’t seen anything conservative out of him. Dump him before America is damaged any further.

Squiggy on January 8, 2010 at 6:44 AM

I for one want Steele to keep being ineffective. The more money that goes directly to local coandidates like Doug Hoffman by donors instead of beeing funneled into the coffers of RINO’s like Dede Scozzafaza the better. If not for the RNC a Democrat would not have won that seat.

cadams on January 8, 2010 at 7:07 AM

Having a prominent role in the party is worth more to him long term than any royalties he’ll earn now. Is he trying to ingratiate himself with tea partiers ahead of some future run for office? Because, judging from our commenters, he’s got a long way to go.

I think the problem is that he’s too much part of the McCain/liberal wing of the party who thinks the GOP needs to be Democrat-lite and that there is no place in the party for social or evangelical conservatives. Steele was visibly angry when Scuzzofava was ousted from contention in the NY-23rd race. I don’t know what you call somebody who isn’t quite a RINO but hates real conservatives but Steele is part of that crowd.

highhopes on January 8, 2010 at 7:11 AM

They can’t get rid of him. It would be racist to remove the first black chairman in the history of the world and would not go well for the party. At least that’s what the left will say and it will damage the midterms. We have to ride it out until November and then can his butt. Meanwhile back at the ranch the only thing the party can do is run damage control and try very hard to keep him on a short leash.

milwife88 on January 8, 2010 at 7:38 AM

milwife88 on January 8, 2010 at 7:38 AM

I truly believe there is a war going on within the GOP. The McCain wing is in a snit because they are losing influence as the real conservatives are taking the party back from Senator “go along to get along” and his band of RINOs.

highhopes on January 8, 2010 at 7:57 AM

“He’s talking like he’s some kind of tea partier … when [in 2006] he was THE most moderate candidate we had in the field.

AP, you’re being dishonest when you only bold the first part of that line. Bold the whole thing so that people see the context. Otherwise, it looks like they are putting down the tea partiers instead of saying that “he acts conservative now but a few years ago he was basically a RINO”.

DethMetalCookieMonst on January 8, 2010 at 8:00 AM

Hey HighHopes, there is not a “McCain/liberal wing of the [GOP] party.” The few Republicans out there who are “liberal” — say, Schwartznegger — are isolated and do not form a “wing”; and McCain is not one of them.

Historically, McCain’s voting record overall is rated moderately conservative, and he has been pro-life fiscal conservative, a consistent opponent of out-of-control federal spending and earmarks. McCain’s voting record in 2009 is conservative — period. He voted AGAINST every Obama bailout bill (and even voted against the second release of TARP monies when Bush was still President in late 2008). McCain voted AGAINST every Obama spending bill, denouncing Obama’s multi-trillion dollar deficit spending as “generational theft.” McCain voted AGAINST the confirmations of tax cheat Geithner, radical pro-abortion advocate Sibellius, leftist attorney Kagan and transnational advocate Koh to their respective positions in the Obama Administration. McCain voted AGAINST the confirmation of Sotomayer to the U.S. Supreme Court. McCain voted AGAINST ObamaCare and was attacked by the New York Times for throwing bombs on the subject. McCain has announced that he will vote AGAINST this year’s cap and trade bill. And then there are McCain’s conservative credentials in foreign policy, military matters and national security. So give the liberal tag a rest as to McCain; the tag does not apply.

Phil Byler on January 8, 2010 at 8:01 AM

Received email yesterday from Steele representing the RNC saying that we should give money DIRECTLY to Steve Brown for campaign for the open Mass. Senate seat. Dude! Bypass the RNC and donate directly? That’s what I have been doing all along. The RNC and the rest of the GOP alphabet soup leadership committees are so far off the mark. They aren’t helpful, they are damaging to the cause!

Dandapani on January 8, 2010 at 8:08 AM

These GOP aides need to take a hike. They are all part of the out-of-touch republican party that led us down the road to our current situation. Seriously, the GOP would be better off hiring tea-partiers and readers of sites like this, than they would be listening to the out-of-touch children of privelege who work for the GOP.

golfballs03 on January 8, 2010 at 8:20 AM

So true, so true Allah — he isn’t getting it done.

He just figures out that people give direct to candidates they like, instead of the RNC? That was the prescription in 1994.

tarpon on January 8, 2010 at 8:22 AM

Am I the only one who thinks Michael Steele is awesome?

GW_SS-Delta on January 8, 2010 at 8:48 AM

The Republican party is where it is now because of George Bush and his ilk. I don’t think the GOP is ready to lead. They are largely the same group who were spending like drunken sailors during the Bush years. They were just as bad at pork barrel spending as Democrats. I was a staffer for my Republican Congressman and one of the most important documents of the legislative year was his pork priority list – a list of all of his pet projects that he needed to get funding for. And I will tell you that he is considered one of the more conservative members of our party. They all need to be booted out, and we need REAL conservatives in there.

golfballs03 on January 8, 2010 at 8:49 AM

Steele sucks….just another blow hard that doesn’t know when to shut his yap. Oh, and he’s ‘not ready to lead’ which is obvious to everyone but himself.

Get someone with a backbone and some principles that we can rally behind…win or lose. Principle counts.

search4truth on January 8, 2010 at 9:12 AM

Dude, he’s gone rogue.

Nah, the Left just flipped him.

TheBigOldDog on January 8, 2010 at 9:20 AM

There is a time in any organization where to be headless is good. Now is that time for the RNC. Even on the second and third level the jobs are filled with inside the belt way RINOs that do more harm than good. If Steele would just STFU and stay off of TV he would be doing all of us a favor.

inspectorudy on January 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Phil Byler on January 8, 2010 at 8:01 AM

I remmeber McCain’s so called ‘conservative’ rating from the ACU. It was based on 25 votes. McCain missed 15 of them, but only the 10 he showed up for were counted in his 80% rating. He was in DC for many of the votes & it looked liked he ducked on conservative issues he would vote against so it wouldn’t be counted against him. For 8 out of 25 he gets a 32% conservative rating.

Remember him & Amnesty & you won’t make that mistake again.

TomJW on January 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM

McCain’s voting record in 2009 is conservative — period.

The trouble with that is, you have to specify the year you’re talking about.

Chris_Balsz on January 8, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Prediction.

He will keep pushing the envelope until he gets fired, then he will switch parties and declare the GOP racist. this will make him a huge star in the DNC.

Monkeytoe on January 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM

Steele tried to purge the deadwood from the party apparatus.

Unfortunately, he found that some of the deadwood is protected by RINOs.

acat on January 7, 2010 at

Exactly. Protected by people like Allahpundit, the ‘David Brooks’ type of conservative. Is anyone else tired of his “Gulp” comments when the going gets tough?

Steele made a great point. There’s no point of a GOP house majority if they’re just going to carry on the way the did during Bush’s terms in office. Apparently that’s controversial. Why?

Dave From Canada on January 8, 2010 at 10:11 AM

I don’t think he has a grand scheme for the RNC either but they need to do something quietly and not fight publicly. Man up and either make him do his job or fire him and get going. The RNC is making a mistake by not listening to what is drawing citizens to the Tea Party movement. It’s the anger over this radical shift from the constitution and American values – pretty simple.

uber-con on January 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM

Republicans said there’s a growing concern that Steele is catering to conservative activists and others who may not have the party’s best interests at heart.

Which of these are the “Republicans” who were the source of the story saying:

“(conservative activists and others) who may not have the party’s bets interests at heart.”

or

“(conservative activists) and (others who may not have the party’s best interests at heart.”)

BD57 on January 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM

I also don’t see anything conservative about Steele and wouldn’t trust him to carry the conservative message. It will get too heavy in his hands and he will surely drop it and pick up the “moderate” message again. It suits him better.

Extrafishy on January 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM

The Republicans as a whole need to demonstrate a little grace. Americans pull for the underdog, and if conservatives continue with mean-spirited piling on, the tide will turn against us.

Same as in a football game, people hate running up the score on a helpless opponent. Careful.

eaglesdontflock on January 8, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Same as in a football game, people hate running up the score on a helpless opponent

You see Obama as a helpless opponent? Good God.

Dave From Canada on January 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM

You see Obama as a helpless opponent? Good God.

I don’t, but many of the stupid voters who put him in do. You teach to the lowest common denominator in this game. The margin of victory is small.

eaglesdontflock on January 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Exit answer: I think the answer can be found in the philosophy behind the Republican Leadership Council (RLC), a “fiscally conservative and socially inclusive” political action committee, which Mr. Steele helped establish in 1993.

The RLC is not exactly an incubator for RINO hunters, which is precisely what’s called for in this political chimera environment.

Mr. Steele needs to bring up the heavy partisan artillery.

That, and stop being flaccid in response to bigots like DL Hughley.

But I’m just silly that way.
.

locomotivebreath1901 on January 8, 2010 at 11:08 AM

Don’t like the Steelers, never have. Go Bengals!

Osis on January 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM

I hate to admit it; but, on this issue I agree with Steele. The Republicans are not fit to lead. They are piggies feeding at the trough not leaders doing what the voters want.

The Republican party left me behind some years ago. In another note I commented that maybe the nation is not ready for a Palin Presidency on the grounds of taking two fliers on “first evers” in a row. Two high flying gambles in a row is too much to ask for.

BUT, if the Republicans don’t move my direction “scroom”. I shall vote for Palin. If the country doesn’t go that way, screw it, too. For surely it will be screwed if either the Democrats keep the Presidency or the present crop of Republicans take it.

The Republican party should be consigned to the dust-bins of history.

{^_^}

herself on January 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM

I really, really, really miss Lee Atwater. That RNC chairman had balls. Michael Steele is a gelding…if he ever had any to begin with.

Visit Conservative Talk Forum by clicking on my name. You can create your own discussion threads. Lib-trolls are severely beaten so don’t say you leftists weren’t warned.

trapeze on January 8, 2010 at 1:21 PM

If you’re accused of not being ready to lead, launching a whispering campaign through aides shows a certain…lack…of leadership.

Chris_Balsz on January 8, 2010 at 1:21 PM

Comment pages: 1 2