Panic at the Democratic Disco?
posted at 2:20 pm on January 6, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
We’re six days into 2010, and already we have four significant Democratic retirements. Senators Chris Dodd and Byron Dorgan, Governor Bill Ritter of Colorado, and Michigan’s Lt. Governor John Cherry have all decided to end their election bids for this year; Cherry was the frontrunner for Governor in his state. Politico’s Manu Raju and Josh Kraushaar wonder whether this may be a trend:
Four top Democrats—including veteran Sens. Chris Dodd and Byron Dorgan—all prepared to pull the plug on their campaigns in a 24-hour period that began Tuesday, and in the process, offered an unnerving glimpse at the perilous election year ahead.
With Dorgan’s stunning retirement announcement Tuesday evening, Democrats are now facing their bleakest election outlook in years—and the very real possibility the party will lose its 60-40 Senate supermajority after the November elections. On the House side, the prospect of heavy 20-30 seat losses is already looking increasingly likely. …
Yet the retirements of two senior Democratic senators, and the suddenly altered landscapes in Michigan and Colorado, continue a wave of Democratic bail outs that began with a burst of retirements by veteran House Democrats representing competitive districts, followed by the stunning late December party switch by freshman Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith.
In the meantime, President Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s poll ratings have slipped across the board, generic polling is now generally more favorable to Republicans and a handful of promising Democratic House candidates have abruptly ended their campaigns.
Suddenly, the sad sack GOP is looking at its best shot in three election cycles of making serious gains in November.
First, I don’t know of anyone who has seriously thought that Democrats would hold a 60-seat Senate majority for longer than one session of Congress. While the numbers don’t favor a Republican return to power in the upper chamber, the party controlling the White House almost always loses seats in midterm elections. Democrats would have done well to limit the damage to a couple of seats, but they’ve lost that many through retirement already. Republicans have a shot at picking up perhaps four or five seats, which would significantly change the dynamic in Congress.
But Republicans may do better than that, and certainly will in the House. The latest Rasmussen polling on the generic Congressional ballot shows them with their largest lead in years:
Republican candidates start the year by opening a nine-point lead over Democrats, the GOP’s biggest in several years, in the latest edition of the Generic Congressional Ballot.
The new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 44% would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate while 35% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent.
In the past, Republicans have picked up seats even while slightly trailing on this polling question. A nine-point GOP lead translates to a very bad November for Democrats.
What do these retirements mean, though? Some will argue that it shows that Barack Obama has no coattails, but that’s not entirely accurate or applicable. Coattails come into play when a President is actually on the ballot. If Democrats had Obama on the ticket, they might be more likely to fight an election campaign and hope that Obama can get the kind of turnout he did in 2008. The problem is that the Democratic agenda has motivated its opponents, and Democratic performance in leadership has demotivated its base and alienated the independents who put them in power.
Don’t expect these to be the last retirements we see, either, or Parker Griffith to be the only aisle-jumper. However, the window of opportunity for both will rapidly close, as primary schedules dictate both actions. For Democrats who want to retire, they have to leave enough time for a replacement candidate to gain the nomination. For aisle-jumpers, the timing is even more fraught: they have to switch parties in time to either discourage Republicans from mounting primary campaigns or to beat them at it. If Democrats are still retiring or switching parties in March, they will be in deep trouble.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
We’ll do fine as long as we kick Steele to the curb and get someone with some cajones and principles to lead our charge!
search4truth on January 6, 2010 at 2:23 PM
Dang MI! You have anything left of your two feet to shoot?
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Seriously, I see this session of Congress ending with the granting of unprecedented new powers to the President. They will do everything they can to enable Obama to do whatever the hell he wants after they lose their majority.
rockmom on January 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM
This is a joke, right? How can they say there is a “real possibility” when there is no conceivable way the dems hold 60 seats, and a 30 seat loss in the house is a minimum number.
Vashta.Nerada on January 6, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Ed,
I appreciate your commentary; I always learn something.
keebs on January 6, 2010 at 2:27 PM
This all seems like good news, but I’m wondering whether mass departures will just make it easier in some cases for the Democrats to retain seats – replacement Dem candidates won’t be braving the wrath of constituents, so it’s a clean slate for them.
Rosmerta on January 6, 2010 at 2:27 PM
The Tea Party will be the beneficiary of this mess…as it should.
PatriotRider on January 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM
I’ve a feeling these retirements were already planned.
They ‘negotiated’ to retire so that the dems would have a chance to run a ‘new’ dem in November.
Or..people like Dodd have another job lined up in the administration already?
I don’t know, but this suicidal healthcare vote has to be part of it.
bridgetown on January 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM
The Dems will easily lose 30 seats in the House. Even Michael Steele would bet good money on that.
Obama, Pelosi, and Reid forcing through the health care takeover behind closed doors will be the nail in the party’s coffin. If the GOP had any stones, they’d boycott the State of the Union. Or attend it and go Joe Wilson on him everytime he lies(which would cause it to last 5 hours).
Doughboy on January 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Can the dems use reconciliation on everything if the Senate votes to open and close debate. Is there something that the dems can do to get rid of the 60 vote thing. I just can’t see them giving up all this power without a fight.
Brat4life on January 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM
But then again, what do I know, I’m just part of the un-educated class.
PatriotRider on January 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM
I can only guess what all goes on in Dem & GOP corners-probably the same crap.
After reading Palin’s book & her version of what the GOP was like, I remain unconvinced they are any better right now than the Dems.
Seriously-the GOP needs to get rid of all of these snakes.
Anyone in power on that side has done nothing but screw up.
Where are the real leaders in this country?
Where are the real patriots who wish to honorably uphold the Constitution?
Where is a leader that we can aspire to be like?
I see no one but Palin.
She’s a normal human being.
Congress is not.
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM
Chris Dodd dancing at the Disco (go to 1:33 for Chris Dodd’s part).
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM
Next up? Pomeroy in the House for ND. He will announce today he is not going to run for Dorgan seat. If he can’t win statewide as senate he will never hold his statewide House seat. Expect him to announce his retirement soon.
Rocks on January 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Whites only?
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM
This is interesting:
Enoxo on January 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Boycotting is bad idea, makes our side look petty.
Maybe they can all just sit there, be quiet, and hold a copy of the constitution. Anything to help our society to start discussing our constitution.
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Young folks and minorities will not be voting in large numbers so I predicit a bloodbath.
txag92 on January 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM
I think Hoeven has a real chance to win. The guy has been really good for our state.
Pomeroy is just another lifer.
But it is true that many North Dakotans profess to be conservative, & yet love their liberal pork gravy.
I can’t tell you how many ‘conservatives’ get so steamed about the big issues & complain about BO, but turn right around & espouse socialist policies bcs they don’t want their Medicare/caid/welfare/farm payment gravy train to stop.
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Reconciliation can only be used on a budget bill. And in order to use it every spending measure in the bill must be paid for with specific revenues. They can’t use reconciliation for ordinary legislation, including most of the health care bill or the financial system destruction act that the House passed in December. Those bills will still require cloture in the Senate.
rockmom on January 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Maybe not bcs they’re unemployed & living at home with their conservative parents who will threaten to disown them if they vote lib. LOL!
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Any Democrat or Squish Republican left at the public trough after Obamacare passes, please turn out the lights on your career.
kingsjester on January 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Why would the dems need ANY power after passing this healthcare monstrosity?
It will be in every part of our lives.
bridgetown on January 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Suddenly the party that was ‘going to rule forever’ looks like it’s running down.
GarandFan on January 6, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Boycotting is a bad idea.
It got us Obama & the present Congress.
Too many people give up, which is sometimes boycotting.
We gotta do something. And nothing is not an option.
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 2:35 PM
A lot of video games to be sold the week before the election and given to “kids” on Tuesday. “Here Johnny, try this new Halo game I bought you.”
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Thanks, I’m just hoping if the Dems lose the house they don’t have a way to jam through anymore $h!tty bills even though they have still will have more reps than the republicans. I don’t believe any of these idiots anymore.
Brat4life on January 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM
I’d like to see them get creative and have the response to the SOTU delivered by a doctor, or a grandma who is losing her Medicare Advantage, or a small building contractor who is getting screwed in this bill. Maybe even all three. That would be all kinds of awesome.
rockmom on January 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM
One HUGE problem, they won’t care what they do or how they vote on bills. Just a thought on the outcome.
elclynn on January 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM
There are too many unions that have such contracts for the House to accept the tax. In past years, unions would agree to smaller wage increases, but got more generous health coverage instead. So it’s like an increase in income tax for them.
The House version just raises the income taxes on higher incomes.
Wethal on January 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM
By not running incumbants in these elections, even if the Democrats manage to hang onto the seats, they are going to have to spend more money on those seats. Since there is only so much money to go around, this means less money for them to spend elsewhere.
MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Ed,
With respect to Obama’s coattails, I think that it is applicable here. Back in the 2002 mid-terms, Bush had campaigned for Republican candidates hard, criss-crossing the country as if it were the presidential election. What will be telling here is if Obama tries to do the same thing and how many Dem candidates say no thanks.
KG in Sask on January 6, 2010 at 2:38 PM
In 2010, we will be electing the Governors and state legislatures that will be overseeing the next round of redistricting.
MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 2:39 PM
Support for Democrats is strengthening!
/getasimonblueshipley
LibTired on January 6, 2010 at 2:40 PM
This is all standard pre-election moves by the DNC, granted they haven’t had to do this much this fast since 2000 though. The internals told them which candidates stood a halfway decent chance on their election outcome and they threw the bad ones out. Simple as that. After all they do not have the money they had in 06 and 08 anymore.
Johnnyreb on January 6, 2010 at 2:41 PM
ed, good stuff, i’m trying to understand the rationale behind these retirements…are these “unprecedented?” or just a fact of life in an election year?
ted c on January 6, 2010 at 2:41 PM
Why do I have a sinking feeling that there is something nefarious going on with these “retirements”? What have these people been promised and why NOW? Something evil is afoot. IMO
ihasurnominashun on January 6, 2010 at 2:41 PM
Sounds like ACORN has their work cut out for them. Creating all those “voter” lists…and then there’s the danger of carpal tunnel, signing all those voter registration forms all day…must be hard work.
RBMN on January 6, 2010 at 2:42 PM
what about these dems that are up for reelection but are too young to retire? they’re stuck aren’t they, with trying to win an election that they’re almost preordained to lose?
ted c on January 6, 2010 at 2:44 PM
i know, there’s a disturbance in the force…. i can feel it.
ted c on January 6, 2010 at 2:45 PM
rockmom
I’ll volunteer to be the “small building contractor”,
and an ex-Democrat.
elclynn on January 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Redstate picking up a Tweet from Mark Foley (yes, that Mark Foley.) Awesome if Rubio stands alone for the GOP in FL.
Wethal on January 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Nice Smiths reference, Ed.
“Hang the deejay, hang the deejay hang the deejay!”
BlueStateBilly on January 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Usually, when rats abandon a sinking ship, they don’t put additional holes in the hull first…
Vashta.Nerada on January 6, 2010 at 2:52 PM
How about a walk out as soon as The Precedent starts lying?
antisocial on January 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM
More like the stampede in Boston’s Cocoanut Grove fire of 1942.
Yes, conventional wisdom says the party is apt to lose seats but Dems should be feeling good about their chances what with getting all the administration’s agenda passed.
highhopes on January 6, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Wait till the Young folks and minorities see they are paying a $750 fine for NOT having health care on their tax returns. (Who is FICA and why is he taking my money?) That won’t show up for the 2010 elections, but it will in 2012.
We will ALL see a dramatic increase in our Health Insurance. The House bill says that the highest insurance can only be 2x the lowest and the Senate is 3x. With mandates on pre-existing conditions covered this means a 22 year old male non-smoker/non-drinker who runs 5 miles a day will pay only 1/2 as much as a 55 year old 4’6″, 3 pack a day smoker, drug addict alcoholic with cancer, diabetes, 2 heart attacks and 2 heart bybass surgeries with liver disease. (The 22 year old is now paying about $100 per month. The 55 year old IF he had always been covered would be paying over $950.)
barnone on January 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Also learn to sign ‘You lie’ and various other bits. Silent forms of protest can be as damaging as overt forms of protest.
Holger on January 6, 2010 at 2:55 PM
Which leads to an interesting question. The administration has used bullying and pure partisanship to destroy and betray America this past year. If the GOP makes significant inroads, what kind of a President will Obama become? Will he try to lead or will the system collapse in total gridlock?
highhopes on January 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM
Was Chris Dodd promised the ambassadorship to Ireland so he can spend time in his cottage?
What kind of promises are being made to these future losers to get them to screw the American people before they leave office?
Skeptic on January 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Gridlock. He isn’t Clinton. He is a post-Democrat Clinton which means, no surrender, no retreat, no compromise. Plus he knows Chicago politics which is dirty as hell. I’d say, impeachment and removal.
Holger on January 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Er, um, Post Clinton Democrat. Democrats hate Clinton for his right ward shift after ’94 despite he was the best Democrat president for it since Kennedy.
Holger on January 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM
You forgot Neil Abercrombie, Democrat Congressman from Hawaii, stated yesterday that he will resign, completely, February 28th in an attempt to seek election as Governor since Lida Lingle (R) cannot run for re-election as she is serving her second term.
Enoxo on January 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM
Doug MacArthur once famously kept Harry Truman waiting for a good couple of hours.
When they finally met, HT is reported to have told DM something like “I don’t give a good gawd damn what you think of Harry Truman, but don’t you EVER treat the President of the United States like that again.”
I think there’s a lesson in there…
Bruno Strozek on January 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM
Even the rats don’t want any part of this debacle.
rjoco1 on January 6, 2010 at 3:02 PM
hey, i’m in Michigan, Cherry is not running? that’s great news, but i doubt he was the frontrunner given all that has happened during his time as number 2 to Granholm.
booter on January 6, 2010 at 3:05 PM
A good point, except “they” didn’t care before either. Dodd is my senator and I don’t even bother sending him anything. He has been completely impervious and dismissive to his constituents for quite some time. It will be good to have him gone.
marybel on January 6, 2010 at 3:05 PM
I’ll celebrate when Harry Reid announces his retirement. Until then, sure this is good news but, something just ain’t right here. Could this possibly be another Dem destraction?
milwife88 on January 6, 2010 at 3:05 PM
But if the democrats push through the universal voter registration bill, the blood bath may turn into a burrito bath of new democrat voters.
Beware!
Dhuka on January 6, 2010 at 3:07 PM
I can’t wait until those underhanded, lobbyist money taking, corrupt D’s are replaced by those underhanded, lobbyist money taking, corrupt R’s. Everything will be great then.
rjl1999 on January 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM
The next election is going to be a bloodbath for democrats. The only people that are still behind them are the kool aid drinkers and those still hoping for a hand out.
Pass the popcorn.
HornetSting on January 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Ed Schultz to the rescue? lol lol lol
joedoe on January 6, 2010 at 3:11 PM
OK. We will have Garrett Morris give GOP SOTU commentary for the hearing impaired. ;-)
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 3:11 PM
Yup, just checked, cherry was running 4th to 3 republican candidates.
He bailed so Dems could continue their complete destruction of Michigan.
booter on January 6, 2010 at 3:12 PM
I do not thing the GOP would get a chance to sit down.
WashJeff on January 6, 2010 at 3:13 PM
ted, I think the retirements are pretty much unprecedented. The retirements from the minority Repubs, not so much. However, retirements like this from the Dem Majority, finally firmly ensconced in the catbird seat, is unusual even for an election year.
Hence, that’s why the lefties are so up in arms that the media is making “such a big deal” about Dems “dropping like flies.” It really is unprecedented for the “winners” to take their football and leave at halftime.
I like to think they are “dropping like cowpies.”
marybel on January 6, 2010 at 3:15 PM
Please give to Scott Brown.
OmahaConservative on January 6, 2010 at 3:23 PM
I fundamentally reject the premise that Dems automatically get a pass by simply changing candidates. People are smart. Just because the creeps who vote for our destruction have dropped out of the race, doesn’t mean that the next Dem will do any better and the voters recognize this. So, while voter disatisfaction is what is driving some of these people from office doesn’t automatically mean that a new Dem will fare any better. The voter still has the power, as long as they choose to use it.
glennbo on January 6, 2010 at 3:24 PM
These Dem ‘Retirements’, put a whole new light on why the health care bill had to be voted on prior to the Christmas break.
PappaMac on January 6, 2010 at 3:24 PM
Calling Bleeds Blue and Rywall.
Schadenfreude on January 6, 2010 at 3:24 PM
huskerdiva on January 6, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Oh, you’d be perfect.
You could also take some swipes at Sen. Judas Iscariot Nelson.
OmahaConservative on January 6, 2010 at 3:28 PM
That brings back a visual from my younger years….splat.
PappaMac on January 6, 2010 at 3:29 PM
LMAO!
Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM
Keep spreading the word to everyone – this is a golden opportunity to end the supermajority in the Senate and it should not be wasted- Give and tell everyone you know to give!!!
huskerdiva on January 6, 2010 at 3:33 PM
I want to watch as Nazi Pelussolini has to relinquish the gavel when the new GOP Speaker is sworn in.
Maybe she’ll hold the grandbaby then, too.
fossten on January 6, 2010 at 3:34 PM
I think they should chuckle and shake their heads in disbelief at Obama’s run-of-the-mill lies, and should laugh out loud at his whopper’s.
Ridicule is a powerful form of attack.
SwampYankee on January 6, 2010 at 3:34 PM
I would be delighted to do so!!!!
huskerdiva on January 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM
My money’s on Specter in PA. Getting more unpopular by the minute and facing a challenge from the left — his good friends (the Dems who were so welcoming less than a year ago) are going to be putting the squeeze on him to hang it up so as to avoid a bloody primary battle.
CJ on January 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM
It’s called damage control-replacing definite losers with maybe winners. Behind the scenes Soros is pulling the strings.
MaiDee on January 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM
No kidding. Those things are guaranteed. A “real possibility” would be 8-10 in the Senate, and 70-90 in the House. More than that isn’t out of the question.
Remember, Obama will keep doing what he’s doing; who thinks he will change course to minimize the coming bloodbath? Only (FAR) lower unemployment might blunt the GOP onslaught a bit, but that can only happen if taxes are lowered dramatically so businesses can afford to hire. And seriously — who thinks THAT will happen?
Unemployment will stay over 10 until the GOP is back in complete control, however long that takes. There is simply no other way the necessary groundwork for recovery can be laid.
Dirty Creature on January 6, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Roberta @ 2:27pm:
That’s exactly why GOP candidates need to make 2010 about Reid and Pelosi. Any Dem Congresscritter –new, old, blue, or bold–helps keep this country in the hands of those two favor brokers. And the country can’t take it!
johnny alpha on January 6, 2010 at 3:40 PM
My money’s with Specter, too, even with the Black panthers at the polling sites and the enhanced ACORN voter registration rolls, he doesn’t stand a chance at this point – he’ll be persuaded to take one for his new team.
huskerdiva on January 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM
“My fellow Americans….” followed by feet shuffling sounds.
GnuBreed on January 6, 2010 at 3:49 PM
This has been common knowledge for a while-Abercrombie announced last fall he was thinking about it. BTW he was a dear college friend with the parents of the Cool Guy in the White House in the late 1950s.
Del Dolemonte on January 6, 2010 at 3:59 PM
glennbo on January 6, 2010 at 3:24 PM
With Dodd, a lot of the dissatisfaction was with all of the scandals he has been involved in over the last few years. CT is still pretty liberal over all.
MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Not only that, but I also heard today that Sen. Kaufman (D-DE) won’t seek re-election. My Hot Air Delaware friends (Akzed, Crazy_Legs, Big D, etc) recognize Kaufman as the seat-warmer selected to take Biden’s seat.
Democrats need not worry though. Sheriff Joe’s son Beau is expected to run for that seat. He’ll win easily since the idiots here in Delaware will see the name on the ballot and think they’re voting for Joe.
UltimateBob on January 6, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Nazi Pelussolini!!!!! LOL! Good one!
I’m also looking forward to the day she goes back to being just another senator. Better yet, I look forward to the day she goes back to being a private citizen who can’t legally steal any more of my paycheck.
Better still, I look forward to the day she reaches room temperature.
UltimateBob on January 6, 2010 at 4:03 PM
dittos the principles and values needed to lead … American values and principles, not Kenyan.
Steele is just bumbling around, and I had high hopes for him.
tarpon on January 6, 2010 at 4:05 PM
Badger40, you took the words right out of my mouth right after WashJeff took the soda right out of my mouth- and on to my keyboard! *mops up keyboard again*
NightmareOnKStreet on January 6, 2010 at 4:08 PM
I’m sorry. Steele is right. The republicans aren’t ready to lead. Look at Lindsey Graham and John McCain. Two dolts who want to take up amnesty and tax and cap legislation to further drive the economy and taxpayers into the dirt. There is a lot of weeding that needs to be done in the republican ranks before these Bozos get the idea in their heads that its all about freedom, a free economy, lower taxes and individualism.
kens on January 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM
I write here that that’s just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
LFRGary on January 6, 2010 at 4:19 PM
Uh.. congress can’t add or remove from presidential power. The US Constitution is the rule book. Would be nice if we started following it.
Partisan on January 6, 2010 at 4:19 PM
Who in their right mind would vote for a jumper from the other party. The GOP better be running some new blood in the primaries too. That same old BS ain’t gunna do it this time boys. We have been screaming and you turned deaf ears to us. Begging for money should be replaced with the strokes of the pen. Do I hear any pen strokes yet?
mixplix on January 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Really.. another ‘we suck less’ campaign? How did that work out for McCain?
How about we push for principles? How about we push to restore our FREEDOM?
Partisan on January 6, 2010 at 4:21 PM
None of the affected states represent any problems for Democrats at all. Replacement Democrats will be elected in all cases, and I will bet the farm on that.
Republicans are hated in those states like you would not believe unless you live there, and the media is making sure that the Tea Partiers will be hated even more.
jay12 on January 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM
Let me second that, search4truth.
I am sick of receiving these dumb mail polls/surveys, from the RNC, asking me “What’s Most Important To You?” and giving you things to choose from (i.e., “Economy, Immigration, Healthcare, etc.
Hey, RNC: If you stuck to conservative principles, like you’re supposed to, you don’t need to waste money sending these damn things out!!!
ToddonCapeCod on January 6, 2010 at 4:30 PM
Even a sheep, sheared of it’s coat in January and shoved back outside, will eventually learn to try and bite the shearer. Or it will go extinct.
GnuBreed on January 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »