DHS IG says bureaucracy unable to fight terrorism

posted at 11:36 am on January 6, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

In the aftermath of the EunuchBomber’s botched attack, Janet Napolitano assured Americans 48 hours later that “the system worked”.  When the entire nation scoffed at that assertion, the DHS Secretary amended her remarks to assert that she just meant her system worked — even though that had nothing to do with the conversation at hand with CNN’s Candi Crowley or with the concerns of Americans.  Now, the Inspector General of DHS says that Napolitano is as wrong as she can be about her amended assertion, and that DHS is failing miserably at counterrorism:

The Homeland Security Department’s National Operations Center (NOC) is “unable” to do its job of ensuring coordination among the 22 federal agencies that make up the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and focuses too much on disaster management rather than terrorism prevention, according to its own inspector general.

The National Operations Center, in fact, functions largely in name only, and current operations apparently have diminished its ability to respond to terrorist threats.

These assessments are presented in a redacted report from the DHS Office of Inspector General released in November and entitled “Information Sharing at the National Operations Center.”

The main problem?  Bureaucracy, and the alphabet soup of agencies blended into DHS.  Despite the mandate from Congress, DHS’ NOC has little authority to compel cooperation.  They must “politely ask” agencies to work with them even within the DHS structure.  Meanwhile, the component agencies continue to pursue turf protection and their own goals.

Even more disturbing, the IG reports that DHS hasn’t been focused on counterterrorism for a long period of time.  Instead, they have responded to the post-Katrina mandate to focus on emergency response to disasters.  This is precisely the problem critics of the creation of DHS predicted when Congress married national security to disaster response.  They are two different tasks with completely different approaches, and having one organization splitting its focus weakens both efforts.

This mirrors the issue of intelligence after the EunuchBomber, which came from a lack of information sharing within another conglomerated bureaucracy created by Congress to solve that specific problem.  In that case, Congress kept all of the component agencies as is, added a central clearinghouse for data gathering, and slapped several layers of bureaucracy on top of it all.  That’s exactly what DHS and NOC did as well.

Congress has to revisit both and eliminate the problems it created over the last eight years.  National security and disaster response should be two separate entities, with streamlining to eliminate bureaucratic boundaries and turf wars and with better focus on both missions.  This is not a failure of the Obama administration, which really did inherit both problems, but it’s Obama’s responsibility to fix it — and Obama should have been more proactive in doing so rather than waiting for a terrorist attack that thankfully failed.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Janet’s auditioning for the Chip Diller role in the remake of “Animal House”.

jon1979 on January 6, 2010 at 11:43 AM

How does one get into Canada? My bags are packed.

Cinday Blackburn on January 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM

We’re screwed.

bridgetown on January 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM

How does one get into Canada? My bags are packed.

Cinday Blackburn on January 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM

It’s out of the frying pan, into the fire for you–eh?

Kralizec on January 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Not to worry though, they have this issue addressed in the new healthcare bill.

singlemalt_18 on January 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Cinday, two reeasons for not moving to Canada:

1. It’s cold.
2. Drywall lives there.

kingsjester on January 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Obama should have been more proactive in doing so rather than waiting for a terrorist attack that thankfully failed screwing around on vacation, squabbling with FOX, and totally dicking up our healthcare system

context.

ted c on January 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM

I heard the Eunechbomber was up for the role of the black guy in the Joys Of Sex album skit in the remake of The Kentucky Fried Movie.

Denverslim on January 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM

DHS is an overbloated, rotting bag of bureaucratic blubber. The only thing it has created is more paperwork and less security.
Kill it. Allow the agencies to stand alone and do their damn jobs!

HornetSting on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I just can’t wait until the Government is running my healthcare.

Knucklehead on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Other than wage war or collect taxes, what does a bureaucracy do well?

BierManVA on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Yeah….but they are probably doing a damn great job of monitoring global warming.

Kasper Hauser on January 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM

When “terrorism” is re-defined as “man-made disasters”, then this is what happens. Napolitano is completely in over her head and obviously sees her role and her agency’s role as the government’s “Red Cross” organization.

For God’s sake, get someone in that position who actually understands that we are at war with those who want to kill us simply because we are who we are.

Intrepid on January 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Of course.

The Department of Homeland Security is a massive bureaucracy who’s gears grind slowly. Terrorist organizations tend to be much more organic, and adaptive. By the time DHS has established a security standard, the enemy has moved on.

The answer is to minimize bureaucracy, but it will never happen, because government’s answer to bureaucratic traffic is often times more bureaucracy.

Daddy-O on January 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Other than wage war or collect taxes, what does a bureaucracy do well?

BierManVA on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

getting the citizenry in a bentover position….

ted c on January 6, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Cinday, two reeasons for not moving to Canada:

1. It’s cold.
2. Drywall lives there.

kingsjester on January 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Tru dat, King. But, Canopfor lives there too and he is a great one!
I haven’t seen Drywall around, maybe his moose finally trampled him.
Pass the popcorn, Rush is back and Dodd is being put to pasture. This is getting good.

HornetSting on January 6, 2010 at 11:51 AM

I have always thought the DHS was one of Bush’s biggest mistakes, and it appears I am right. I have never heard of a problem getting fixed by making a new bureaucracy that is more complex than what it was created to replace. They should kick disasters back to FEMA and focus all of the DHS resources to national security. Of course, knowing Congress, they will create a new entity that costs more and does less.

txaggie on January 6, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Cinday, two reeasons for not moving to Canada:

1. It’s cold.

kingsjester on January 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Oh yeah, and we’re having a real heat wave here in Chicago/

Knucklehead on January 6, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Uh oh, another IG will bite the dust. Alzheimer allegetions appear in 5, 4, 3, 2……

atlgal on January 6, 2010 at 11:53 AM

Related Onion-style parody: “Terrorists Evade Security Officials By Dressing as Giant Dots” http://optoons.blogspot.com/2010/01/terrorists-evade-security-officials-by.html

Mervis Winter on January 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Other than wage war under a Republican or collect taxes, what does a bureaucracy do well?

BierManVA on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Now that looks right.

jarodea on January 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM

How does one get into Canada? My bags are packed.

Cinday Blackburn on January 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Canada can’t help you.

Guardian on January 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Isn’t this more a case of “bureaucracy can’t fight terrorism”?

NeighborhoodCatLady on January 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM

Congress has to revisit both and eliminate the problems it created over the last eight years. National security and disaster response should be two separate entities, with streamlining to eliminate bureaucratic boundaries and turf wars and with better focus on both missions.

You want bureaucrats to fix a bureaucratic mess? That’s what a Progressive is a Bureaucrat. They are flourishing under the Progressive President’s tenure, and competing for the most coveted incompetent bureaucratic department of the Government Award. It must be highly coveted, look how many of the Government’s Usless Departments are in the running GRIN.

Dr Evil on January 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Would we not be safer if we just did away with this monstrosity and used the savings to buy every man, woman and child suitable firearms and training?

It would seem to me that the only sucesses have been the ones brought to a conclusion by citizens acting upon their own.

On every fight with a shoe or underwear bomber there are 10 already pissed off Americans that would be happy to take care of business if called upon.

turfmann on January 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM

22 different agencies? wtf Ive always wondered how the DHS got pulled into helping with natural disasters…and not sharing info? Geez..send them to time-out till they all learn how to share!

becki51758 on January 6, 2010 at 12:02 PM

integrating info from 22 agencies into usable intelligence in order to defend against terrorism? Impossible and pointless! Just ramp up “shock and awe” over Iran, take out the largest state sponsor and ideological spear head of terrorism and the movement will be rendered impotent and inocuous.

beselfish on January 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Anyone else thinking that Napolitano may get canned over this one?

Not that she doesn’t deserve it for other areas of her performance, but a lot of these particular issues are the same ones that have been around since the Clinton days.

teke184 on January 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM

The adults are in charge.

ladyingray on January 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM

So, bureaucracy was essentially blamed for 9/11, troubles with Health Care, immigration, spending waste, and now the thong bomber?

So, what do our fearless leaders propose? More bureaucracy!

cntrlfrk on January 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM

DHS IG says bureaucracy unable to fight terrorism

Well, at least we know who’s going under the bus for this one.

Pablo on January 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM

So Nappy could get the axe and Ogabe then appoints another dimwit to take her place, joy.

Considering the blase attitude the entire demorat party is taking toward terrorism right now, I won’t be feeling safer anytime soon.

Bishop on January 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Who knew? A bureaucracy acts like a bureaucracy.

Hey, let’s unionize them all. That will fix it.

PattyJ on January 6, 2010 at 12:14 PM

When “terrorism” is re-defined as “man-made disasters”, then this is what happens.

Intrepid on January 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM

DHS’ dual-purpose structure is no doubt a principal reason for the re-definition; don’t solve the problem, rename it to fit.

Barnestormer on January 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM

So Nappy could get the axe and Ogabe then appoints another dimwit to take her place, joy.

Considering the blase attitude the entire demorat party is taking toward terrorism right now, I won’t be feeling safer anytime soon.

Bishop on January 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM

I wonder if Ja-Blow’s replacement will be communist or socialist?

HornetSting on January 6, 2010 at 12:18 PM

DHS has made many visits to our little rural communities in SW ND to plan for disaster management.
As a volunteer fire fighter, my husband had to attend ‘special disaster training’ run by DHS.
After many boring hours of nonsense, he was mailed a ‘certificate’ of completion.
We can take care of ourselves out here.
They need to worry about more pressing matters.

Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 12:25 PM

Would we not be safer if we just did away with this monstrosity and used the savings to buy every man, woman and child suitable firearms and training?

Sweet idea. I’m all for it.

It would seem to me that the only sucesses have been the ones brought to a conclusion by citizens acting upon their own.

Pretty much. Ask any crime victim living in a bog coty how long they had to wait for the police to come & ‘save’ them.

On every fight with a shoe or underwear bomber there are 10 already pissed off Americans that would be happy to take care of business if called upon.

turfmann on January 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM

I think about that every time I fly.
I actually make mental notes of passengers & their behavior, especially the ‘swarthy’ looking ones.
Ooops! My racism is showing!

Badger40 on January 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM

Denverslim on January 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM

Not the craw…the CRAW!
You have my gratitude.

Extrafishy on January 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM

DHS IG says bureaucracy unable to fight terrorism

Finally, an honest statement coming from the bureaucrats in DC. That truly is unprecedented.

scalleywag on January 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM

I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I just can’t wait until the Government is running my healthcare.

Knucklehead on January 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM

+1

KeepOhioRed on January 6, 2010 at 12:49 PM

The Department of Education has a budget of over $70 billion and it educates not a single child. It is worthless.

The DHS has a budget of over $47 billion and it doesn’t work either.

drjohn on January 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM

The DHS was a bad idea.

If anything it should be a group of annalists (‘Jack Ryan’s, ‘Cloe’s, ‘Eli’s, ‘Chuck’s) with a Lexis-Lexis/Intersect network data-mining, cross-referencing, inter-comparing, and other awesome type stuff. Ya know, what the NSA used to do.

- The Cat

MirCat on January 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM

“Bureaucracy is a parasite that preys on free thought and suffocates free spirit…” Douglas Adams

BobOfTexas on January 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM

BobOfTexas on January 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM

Are you calling Janet a Vogon?

MirCat on January 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM

MirCat on January 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM

If the poetry fits, read it…

BobOfTexas on January 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM

Now that looks right.
jarodea on January 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM

You must have forgotten about WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam. All Democrat Wars. But other than that, I guess you are right!

BierManVA on January 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM

Two things all elected officials must understand, but never do:

“Bureaucracies are fashioned to enable their components to avoid responsibility” – Piers Anthony, On A Pale Horse

And:

Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy:

Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy states that in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions.

We are doomed to decline and decay until the bureaucracy is drastically reduced.

ZenDraken on January 6, 2010 at 1:05 PM

So what this says is Bush left a dysfunctional bureaucracy to Obama, but did so with information telling Obama upfront it was dysfunctional and heeded to be fixed, and Obama, after 11 months in office failed to even confront the problem, let alone work towards fixing it.

astonerii on January 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM

Wasn’t DHS set up specifically to eliminate the bureaucracy that finally sank FEMA? What is it about “big government doesn’t work well” these fools don’t get?

Crusader Rabbit on January 6, 2010 at 1:13 PM

The Department Of Home(r)land Security (DOHS!) has proven to have all the iron-clad security of a wet, soggy, worn-out piece of cheesecloth!

pilamaye on January 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM

Has he been fired yet?

chemman on January 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM

I think we need a new category for things like DHS: too big to succeed.

ajacksonian on January 6, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Hell yes! Let’s can Nepolitano from DHS and put her in charge of Obamacare. Frankly people, thanks to the ignorant and stupid folks who voted for this assclown, its what we deserve.

kens on January 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM

You must have forgotten about WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam. All Democrat Wars. But other than that, I guess you are right!
BierManVA on January 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM

I’m sorry, I thought we were talking about this century or at least this generation.

Either way do you seriously consider Vietnam under the dems to be really well run? Korea was run a little better but that’s not saying much. Even WW2 was not particularly well run by FDR, though we can cut the guy some slack since he was overseeing a war on 5 fronts at a scale never before even contemplated. WW1 was a total joke for from the reason for joining to the way mobilization was handled to how the army was used to the peace conference. We’re very lucky that the UK and France had lost more manpower than industry and thus were able to equip our army.

So yeah, what I said was right.

jarodea on January 6, 2010 at 4:46 PM

BierManVA, if you want to go further back the Spanish-American War and Civil War were fairly well managed, both with Republicans in charge of course.

But I should warn you my recent senior term paper was on the economics of US military spending and management since 1789, so I am a little read up on how wars and the military were handled over time.

jarodea on January 6, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Other than wage war or collect taxes, what does a bureaucracy do well?

NO thing!!!!!!!

jgdp on January 6, 2010 at 9:31 PM