Chris Matthews: Every single “teabagger” in America is white

See “fascist” would be an insult, because I dislike fascists.

So, your type uses the term “teabagger” because you dislike gays?

I don’t use that phrase, out of deference to your tender sensibilities. Most people who do use it use it because they think it’s funny for people to adopt a vaguely naughty act as their nomme de guerre — you guys started with phrase, not us. They probably watch Family Guy, as well. I have no idea what Chris Matthews uses it, but he seems to be in his his own little world so I don’t read too much into it.

Implying obliquely that someone is gay isn’t an insult, because someone’s gayness bothers me not a whit.

Really, little one. I wish you’d make up your mind! Either calling someone a name is an insult, or it isn’t. So easy to confuse your type, isn’t it?

I didn’t call anyone a name. You just assumed…

It does, however, tend to get under the skin of people who rely heavily on oral sex metaphors, so I occasionaly yield to temptation.

You don’t, you do, you don’t… Do you ever get dizzy? So you use “teabagger” because it gets under the skin of Cwissy Matthews and that tard at NPR? Do you use N***** because it would get under the skin of Juan Williams? Do you use carpetmuncher because it would get under the skin of Mary Cheney, and hence, her old man?

Since Chris (nice with the “Cwissy” you really are as shallow as I thought), Juan and Mary, seem to be substantially more mature than you, the temptation to respond in kind is less. Besides, you have it backwards. The idea would be to find something that arouses fear and loathing in Chris or Mary or Juan and use that against them. Just as you’re wouldn’t be insulted by my implying that deep down you’re actually straight, Juan is likely not insulted by my suggesting that he’s black.

Besides, as we all know from a certain Senator, hanging out in airport bathrooms in no way implies gay activity. You just took it that way.

Back to the bathroom? Yes it implies gay activity. Yes, I took it as such. Your point? Other than you’re still too much of a pu$$y to point out where I made a judgement value about such.

As I said, the eagerness with which you use gay sex metaphors in a derogatory way (in a public forum!) suggests that you are deeply uncomfortable with that orientation.

But, a deal: you guys refrain from the oral sex metaphors and I’ll try not to point out what everybody knows is true — the biggest homophobes have the highest chance of being closeted gays.

Heh, where to start. If we quit repeating Cwis Matthews, you’ll quit calling us gay? Those that use slurs like “teabagger” have the highest chance of being closeted gays?

I’m willing to start now, if you are.

OK, girls?

Insult again? You don’t like “girls?” Anything else you want to get off your chest?

MNHawk on January 6, 2010 at 10:40 AM

No. You’ve made my day a happier one already.

Bleeds Blue on January 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM

Still can’t find an example, little tardlett? It must be really starting to grate on you. I mean, it would me. That is, if I were actually stupid enough to put myself into positions of accusing people of things, without the ability to back them up.

MNHawk on January 6, 2010 at 12:11 PM

I forget what you’re even asking. Have you been drinking already?

The libs like bleeds idiocy are filled with hate and anger…
Monkeytoe on January 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Do you read your own posts?

Bleeds Blue on January 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM

bleed,

I do read my own posts. Do you read yours? Do you ever regret that you must always lie to push your political philosopy? Does it ever bother you that the only “argument” you ever make is “racist” “homophobe”?

You are a true hate-filled idiot with no ethics or integrity. But, that is the definition of liberal.

Monkeytoe on January 6, 2010 at 12:18 PM

I think “hate-filled” pretty much sums up your soul, at least as presented here. I only called MNwhatever a homophobe because he so obviously is one and he reacts so delightfully to being called on it. Pointing out that the tea party faction is overwhelmingly white may strike you as inconvenient, but is certainly the truth. And I refrained from calling them “racist.” I will cop to “bitter,” though.

A few days ago, in one thread, Bleeds Bigots told us that the housing crisis was the Republicans fault, because the Republicans had 52 members in the Senate, and failed to pass reform legislation.

On the same day, in another thread, he told us that despite the fact that the Democrats have 60 seats in the senate, it is the Republicans fault that Obama can’t pass his agenda.

MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 12:21 PMA few days ago, in one thread, Bleeds Bigots told us that the housing crisis was the Republicans fault, because the Republicans had 52 members in the Senate, and failed to pass reform legislation.

On the same day, in another thread, he told us that despite the fact that the Democrats have 60 seats in the senate, it is the Republicans fault that Obama can’t pass his agenda.

MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM

yes. A Republican President and a Republican Congress, pursuing any number of contributing Republican policies caused the banking crisis or allowed it to happen. Their watch.

Obama’s agenda is passing, btw.

It must be nice being a liberal, and be able to ignore reality at will.

1) Some banks are paying off their loans.
2) The only car companies that are recovering, are the ones not owned by the govt (which is one of the definitions of fascism.
3) Socialized medicine doesn’t bring about fascism, it is fascism.

MarkTheGreat on January 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM

In five years the government will largely out be out of banking and cars on an ownership level. The Obama Administration and the vast majority of liberals have no interest in government ownership of the means of production. If Republicans hadn’t cause the economic meltdown, we wouldn’t be there now — sadly, you lefty us a mess to clean up.

Socialized medicine is not fascism, and the Obama plan, at any rate, is far from socialized medicine.

Bleeds Blue on January 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM

Aw, the little tard did remember, after all.

Little Trig cries whenever you say ‘tard.

Is it the drinking that’s responsible for the memory lapses?

No. Just for the bad typing.

You could man up, for once in your little life, and just highlight an example of my homophobia.

I am firmly convinced that your constant reference to fellating, lisping lefties and intriguing overreaction to being called on it suggests a deep dislike of the gays. How are you on the marriage/adoption thing?

You know, I’ve had theories about what makes up a bleedstard. Cowardice & willful stupidity tops my list. Psychosis tops others. There’s one possible explanation we’ve all missed.

Bleedsblue abuses children. Obviously there’s some sort of guilt complex involved, or bleedsblue wouldn’t feel the need to step into threads like these, to get the living retorical crap beat out of him. The pattern fits.

MNHawk on January 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM

Ooooh — into the Twilight Zone.

Bleeds Blue on January 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM