California hoist with own petard on Porkulus spending
posted at 2:20 pm on January 5, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
In today’s Someone Left The Irony On Department, we have the failed state of California and its desperate need to use federal Porkulus money getting tripped up by the very bureaucracy that has caused the Golden State to teeter into bankruptcy. California can’t start dozens of stimulus-funded construction projects because the myriad agencies that have to approve such efforts don’t have the resources to review the paperwork:
Dozens of construction projects funded with federal stimulus money are being delayed in California because the office that oversees historic preservation is overwhelmed with applications, the state’s stimulus watchdog said Monday. …
The state Office of Historic Preservation, an entity of the National Park Service that is an administrative unit of the state Department of Parks and Recreation, is just one of many agencies that must sign off on construction projects before they can begin.
For example, if an alternative energy company is proposing a solar project, the office must make sure the land does not include Native-American artifacts. Similarly, modifying a building that is a registered historic landmark cannot undermine its architecturally significant features.
Chick said many of the delayed projects are small, such as installing a new heating and air conditioning unit. Others are larger infrastructure projects, from a Highway 101 bypass in Mendocino County to rehabilitation of the Pasadena Civic Center, according to lists provided by the inspector general’s office.
At stake is $12 billion in project funding, money the state desperately needs in its financial extremity. It won’t balance the budget — these are ot the block grants that allowed California to pretend for another year that it didn’t need to change its ways — but the money would allow the state to avoid paying for its own infrastructure improvements, and will employ some people for short periods of time, putting a dent in benefits expenditures. California needs that and the income-tax revenue more than most other states as it looks at yet another budget gap running into the tens of billions of dollars.
Consider this … karma. California has the problems it does because of an overly-regulated business climate and top-heavy bureaucracies that throw mountains of red tape at its citizens. If the state has this much trouble getting permits and approvals for its own projects, just imagine what private industry business have to do to make use of their own property. Actually, one does not have to imagine it at all. Just take a look at what has happened to California’s economy as legislators engross themselves in critical issues like creating a new regulatory environment for cow tails in the middle of an economic and budgetary crisis.
Maybe California should think about dismantling its regulatory regime. Not only would that mean more efficient processing of Porkulus projects, but it would also have a salutary effect on actually stimulating the state economy. That way, California wouldn’t need to beg the rest of the nation for charity.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Karma’s a b*tch.
amerpundit on January 5, 2010 at 2:22 PM
What would Nelson Muntz say?
lorien1973 on January 5, 2010 at 2:25 PM
So glad I shook the CA dust off my feet in 2005.
OmahaConservative on January 5, 2010 at 2:27 PM
LOL
This is governmental mastabatory S&M at its finest.
They are screwing themselves and beating themselves with whips at the same time.
sonofdy on January 5, 2010 at 2:27 PM
The projects may not be started, but the “Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act” signs are all over the place in California. So there was no problem with the bureaucracy or the paperwork in getting those babies in place.
jon1979 on January 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM
*facepalm*
MikeZero on January 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Can we just declare California America’s liberal labartory (if it is not considered discriminatory to have a labatory)?
It is around the 8th biggest economy in the world. Liberals should be able to easily show how great their ideas are right in California with no excuses.
WashJeff on January 5, 2010 at 2:29 PM
Damn but you have to love Community Organizers! Go Messiah Go!
Cinday Blackburn on January 5, 2010 at 2:29 PM
As an architect having done some work in CA….i’m simply LMAO.
PatriotRider on January 5, 2010 at 2:29 PM
They also have a unhealthy illegal population dragging them down. I don’t hear anyone saying maybe we should get rid of these freeloaders… Do you?
tarpon on January 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Can’t we just sell California to China, and get it over with?
RBMN on January 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM
California and Michigan…2 amazingly beautiful states, and yet led by morons. tragic.
search4truth on January 5, 2010 at 2:31 PM
But what would that do to unemployment in California? Think of all those state workers and beauocrats that would be thrown into unemployment. These are people with absolutely no marketable skills Being petty an omnipotent aren’t skills in demand outside of Government. The only silver lining is, unemployment for these people would actually cost less then their salaries.
Tommy_G on January 5, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Simple is as simple does… Run Forrest run!
singlemalt_18 on January 5, 2010 at 2:31 PM
California shows you what the endgame of state socialism is: bankruptcy.
The other 49 states are headed there, just a bit slower. That’s why the GOP has to be the party of the two “R’s”, Repeal, and Rollback. It can’t be the party of “somewhat slower” national suicide and contrast itself with the democrats.
wildcat84 on January 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Chuckle. Remember cash for clunkers? 750,000 applications, and the bureaucracy could only process 1000 a week at the start. And that was one agency. People never learn.
percysunshine on January 5, 2010 at 2:34 PM
from wikipedia. good cliche’
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Typical for what happens in a centrally managed economy. The bureaucracy will soon overreact and they will be driving to the Home Depot to hire people to work in the Historical Commission.
pedestrian on January 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM
So what happens if Ahnuld doesn’t get his $8 billion bailout from the other 49 states….errrr, the federal government? Ironically, that would force him to lay off a bunch of these useless bureaucrats which can only help California in the long run.
Doughboy on January 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Don’t forget Michigan, they are teetering on the brink there also. Unemployment in the Detroit area is staggering. We have relatives there and they would love to get out but no one is buying houses, they are just laying off everyone in sight.
Johnnyreb on January 5, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Over-regulate everything; accomplish nothing!
ya2daup on January 5, 2010 at 2:39 PM
there’s 10 mile stretch of barren desert highway that connects Ft. Irwin, CA with northern Barstow *gag*, CA. The libtards wanted to install a 12″ high fence, to prevent the beloved Desert Tortoise (may God bless his soul), from crossing the highway and getting smushed. Unfortunately, the laws designed to protectt the desert tortoise prevented the building of the fence in some areas……
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM
“The sluggard buries his hand in the dish,
but will not even bring it back to his mouth.”
Proverbs 19:24
AubieJon on January 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Clearly the government isn’t big enough. Otherwise they could handle the weight of paperwork created by the big government. Solution? Hire EVERYONE as a government employee. Duh. So simple a California Legislator can do it! /sarc
Ordinary1 on January 5, 2010 at 2:41 PM
The legislators concentrate on cow tails because the really thorny and difficult issues are beyond their abilities and they know it. The entire state of California is one giant exercise in passing the buck, everyone is hoping that someone else will have the courage to tackle the mess.
Bishop on January 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM
California gets the government it deserves and elects over and over again.
Good Lt on January 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM
+1
Lived in both California and Michigan myself. What has happened in those states is criminal, but the voters need only look in the mirror to see who aided in their destruction.
ya2daup on January 5, 2010 at 2:43 PM
OT sorry
*breaking*
U.S. to Suspend Gitmo Detainee Transfers to Yemen
FOXNews.com
key phrase= “right now”
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 2:43 PM
My state is so effed. I’m staying and fighting for it though- mostly because, being underwater on the old mortgage to the tune of $100K, I have to.
My guess is the real unrest would start here if it weren’t for the nice weather. When it gets hot and we start having rolling blackouts like Chile again, get ready because it means it’s SHTF time.
NTWR on January 5, 2010 at 2:44 PM
California state legislators are probably overworked. With only 40 Senators and 80 Reps, each California state legislator represents more people than those of any state in the Union, and each California State Senator represents more people than a U.S. House member.
One would think they have more useful things to do than regulating cow tails, but everybody knows what comes out of the tail end of a cow.
Steve Z on January 5, 2010 at 2:44 PM
Oh, we have the resources alright, they’re just absolutely worthless.
Tommy_G above, is absolutely right.
Do you all realize that State employees get paid for life? That’s right. After 34 years of service (you get 3% of your highest salary per year of service, PLUS benefits) you get a damn fine pension. FULL PAY for life.
Working for the State of California is nothing but Welfare for the middle class.
Bankruptcy would be the best thing that ever happened to this state. Union contracts? Null and Void, baby.
Gunslinger on January 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM
Despite the naysayers California will be getting bailed out for the simple reason that any and all cuts would be coming from government workers, unions and programs.
That has never happened and it will not be allowed.
patrick neid on January 5, 2010 at 2:51 PM
It is interesting, too, that both California and Michigan have run advertisement campaigns during the last two years trying to lure businesses and / or people to move there. Good luck with that!
Both states’ governors are not native-born citizens, by the way.
ya2daup on January 5, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Is this what they mean by “it’s too much of a good thing”?
Herb on January 5, 2010 at 2:52 PM
… advertising campaigns …
ya2daup on January 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM
The thing to remember about bailouts, they are temporary fixes, don’t cure the systemic ills … Which in the case of California is liberalism/socialism/Fascism.
Only a total redo will fix those problems.
Buh bye California.
tarpon on January 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Me too, same year…
I predicted this, but not this bad…just do the math on their pension payouts.
This is what a liberal political climate produces…chaos and disaster.
Every time some liberal poster posts we should just answer…California….they are the model of democrats political results…
right2bright on January 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM
LMAO
Jaibones on January 5, 2010 at 2:55 PM
Sounds like CA is going to have to spend more on hiring extra beaurocrats, then they are going to be getting from these small scale grants in the first place.
MarkTheGreat on January 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM
HA! Who do you think actually does the labor in this golden state? Libs have a conundrum, one that should be exploited– they don’t know whether to favor Mexis or Unions. Mexis gut the unions and minimum wage control enforcement. Unions can’t compete with Mexi workers.
leftnomore on January 5, 2010 at 2:59 PM
LOL! Goooo historical review!
Apologetic California on January 5, 2010 at 2:59 PM
California, the Goldbrick State
rihar on January 5, 2010 at 2:59 PM
I wouldn’t be so sure about that. Way things are going, the rest of us will have to make good on all those pensions via a federal bailout. Obama loves the unions and government workers. Bet lots of the billions “we” taxpayers sent GM went to pay underfunded pensions…and they are back at the trough for more.
marybel on January 5, 2010 at 3:00 PM
And that includes overtime, so for the last year you work a ton of overtime (okayed by your boss with a wink), and you include all the accrued vacation you never took, which is tallied if you add onto a full year as 1 1/2, and some (many) people retire at a higher rate then the average of the last three years of salary.
They mathematically cannot sustain retirement. Since everyone who retires, they have to hire someone else, so they are basically paying for two people to do one job…along with that is the increase of benefits…and since the “boomers” are now reaching the retirement age, the next dozen years is going to be a financial drain like you have never seen…it is just basic math…
right2bright on January 5, 2010 at 3:00 PM
leftnomore on January 5, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Speaking of Michigan we beat Florida with a turtle fence.The Michigan Department of Transportation recently constructed a $318,000 fence to protect turtles crossing U.S. 31 in Muskegon, and it has been recently reported that the Florida Department of Transportation is spending federal stimulus dollars on a $3.4 million underground wildlife crossing along U.S. 27 to protect turtles and other wildlife in Lake Jackson.
fourdeucer on January 5, 2010 at 3:03 PM
Or Fools Gold State.
ThePrez on January 5, 2010 at 3:04 PM
LOL
J_Crater on January 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM
Me too. After being born, raised, and starting my first business there, I was very happy to leave in 1999 after 49 years living in the rat-race of So Cal.
Of course I’m now in MA which is pretty surreal.
Rod on January 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM
But I thought that California was full of whiskey, women and gold….
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Understand that well, leftnomore. Left CA three years ago to be near family in Northeast. The miss the weather a little. I miss my old friends.
But what I miss most about California is what a great place it was 35-40 years ago!
marybel on January 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Perfect.
OmahaConservative on January 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Don’t give Cali a penny.
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM
it is just basic math…
right2bright on January 5, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Which begs the question…..
what in the hell are they teaching in schools these days?
elderberry on January 5, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Remember the pop-economics/business book of the 1980′s “Megatrends”? They called California the “bellwether state”. Sadly, I think they may have been correct. What you get in CA is DC’s (not only BO’s) vision for America.
Let’s take all the politicians from DC, intern them in Excremento, build a big wall around the whole state of CA and declare it its own country. They can live there in the bureaucrat’s paradise and the rest of us can get on with making our lives better without their infuriating interference.
mr.blacksheep on January 5, 2010 at 3:22 PM
I don’t want to have to shell out one penny to save California’s ass. Let that money come from the Pelosi’s and the Feinstein’s and the Boxer’s.
They’ve got lots more than we do.
drjohn on January 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM
apparently not “basic math”….
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM
I am glad I left CA in 2002. Bassackwards state. I love the state, it’s the Californians that are jacked up beyond reproach, as this story clearly points out.
ted c on January 5, 2010 at 3:25 PM
I’m stuck here…
HELP!!!
Seven Percent Solution on January 5, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Obama called, he said it’s “foist”.
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/02/obamateurism-of-the-day-48/
rogerb on January 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM
Maybe they could get jobs as managers. ;}
(/sarc)
Dark-Star on January 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM
And Arnold is looking to go out with a bang in his last year.
BDavis on January 5, 2010 at 3:29 PM
You left out the part where we activate the San Andreas fault with nukes, and let them slide into the Pacific ocean.
percysunshine on January 5, 2010 at 3:30 PM
Painful as it is, I have to agree GS. The beyond useless legislature will never have the stones to dismantle the union-powered state er, “workforce” or the taxpayer funded “services”.
And Seven? I hear you…
JusDreamin on January 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM
In my seemingly never ending quest to GET A JOB there are two states I will absolutely not consider for possible relocation; California and Michigan.
Stephen Macklin on January 5, 2010 at 3:39 PM
Racist!
Tea Bagger!
PattyJ on January 5, 2010 at 3:41 PM
Might want to exclude Nebraska as well. The job ads are as numerous as they’ve been for the last decade but nobody’s getting hired. Even my brother’s part-time position at a pizza place was finally cut after the usual game of ‘reduced hours’. PTL he’s such a genius he gets full-ride scholarships.
Dark-Star on January 5, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Never gonna happen Ed. The last people standing in my state will be the Sierra Club membership and the union leaders.
Both of those groups will see California dead and buried before they give an inch.
This I know.
FireBlogger on January 5, 2010 at 3:56 PM
PS; many prison guards make over 100k per year, most firefighters are over 100k if they put in decent overtime.
Teachers in most districts don’t pay a co pay for doctor visits or medicine.
The unions take, then take some more.
This is the result.
FireBlogger on January 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Many state and local jurisdictions do not want to use federal money on their projects because it causes the costs of the projects to skyrocket.
If local or state money is used for a project, they can pay the crews $12/hr. If a single dollar of federal money is involved, the pay goes to $20/hr and additional fringe benefits must be added that doubles the payroll cost of the project.
Federal money usually has tight timelines for use. This means that contracts must be bid in a hurry rather than scheduled for some time in the future. That results in the contractor winning the project often being from outside of the jurisdiction involved. The money doesn’t benefit your community and ends up going to a different community in a different part of the state.
The additional paperwork requirements when using federal money means that staff workload is increased at a time when these jurisdiction have been forced to reduce staff and/or work hours due to decreases in tax revenues because property values have declined and because the state is taking a larger percentage of the revenue for the general fund.
So taking federal money is often a lose, lose, lose situation for the local jurisdiction. It increases costs, increases workloads, and isn’t likely to help the jurisdiction at all.
The federal government and local communities would be better off and provide more “stimulus” if it simply made “no strings” block grants to the jurisdictions directly.
crosspatch on January 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM
But….But…..Unions are for the everyday working person!!!
/sarc
search4truth on January 5, 2010 at 4:15 PM
Maybe someone from CA can explain to me why it is that when they leave the state they have destroyed by their votes for liberal idiots, they come to other states like my used to be great state Nevada and vote for the same type people and initiatives that ruined the Golden State?
Apparently the socialist state immigrants are doing the same in other states to which they have relocated.
Jvette on January 5, 2010 at 4:33 PM
They have plenty of staff to help them with all that work though. I worked for a California Assemblyman in 1990 and we had 10 staff members in the district and Sacramento. State senators had about 20. And that was 20 years go when Republicans were close to a majority; I imagine they have voted themselves much larger staffs now.
I wish this could someohow be made into a TV ad or at least a Web video so people could see the madness thast liberal government has created. California was in good shape when I left in 1991. It’s sickening to see how quickly an unshakeable Democratic majority has ruined it.
rockmom on January 5, 2010 at 4:42 PM
Then just build a coal-burning power plant and don’t worry about the artifacts.
taznar on January 5, 2010 at 4:43 PM
idiots.and.fools.
j_galt on January 5, 2010 at 4:55 PM
Ca. used to be the fifth largest economy in the the world, that’s proof enough of how not-wonderful liberal policies are.
Speakup on January 5, 2010 at 4:56 PM
juanito on January 5, 2010 at 5:00 PM
Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of clueless, idiotic bureaucrats… Hey, I’m thinking this will look good on their resumes for work with the Obama administration? You?
kazanboyets on January 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM
We need more red tape in Kalifornia. If we can tie the bureaucrats up in it, maybe, just maybe they’ll strangle themselves.
GarandFan on January 5, 2010 at 5:22 PM
not sure if anyone said it but….LOLOL
becki51758 on January 5, 2010 at 5:42 PM
I lived in Austin from 1992 to 1999. In that short period of time, I saw exactly of what you speak. It truly baffles the mind. I’m sure it just boils down to the oft used excuse that liberalism was simply applied incorrectly and next time it will be done right.
stvnscott on January 5, 2010 at 6:44 PM
My whole family is in the same boat as me. Taxes up, business down, underwater mortgages, and rampant unions now teaming up with illegal aliens. I was flat out STUPID to not get a state job out of school. Everyone said it would crush my entrepreneurial spirit, drive, and soul. Well guess what, the State is crushing my small business, drive, and soul. And handing out the fruits of our labor to tenured public professors, criminal tenured “teachers”, illegal aliens and the SEIU.
The obvious solution is to consult for the State, if only I were more of a minority-just being a woman isn’t enough these days, perhaps I should declare myself homosexual or gouge my eyes out to get a chance… a blind homosexual woman might have a chance at a state contract.
NTWR on January 5, 2010 at 6:53 PM
My business is in a 60+ year old building. Yet we can’t do any interior renovation unless we install sprinklers in the whole building. A $100+ K expense. It’s only 4500 sq ft. So we can’t expand in a piss poor business climate thanks to onerous building regs.
keioki on January 5, 2010 at 7:33 PM
My thoughts exactly.
Blacksmith8 on January 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM
I can hear the delta smelt singing the praises of Ahnuld and the dhimmicraps.
Blacksmith8 on January 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM
Some posters think they have moved out of California. You have done no such thing monetarily. You will be paying for its bailout whether you live here or not.
patrick neid on January 5, 2010 at 9:32 PM
But people who leave liberal states often think that the problems come from some other source. They think liberal policies are all that stand between a deteriorating state and devastation ala Detroit.
Our education and media teach them that. If they don’t stumble across any other source, it’s fatal error.
PattyJ on January 5, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Last estimate I heard – about 3 months ago – was the Legislature had approximately 2500 staffers. That comes out to 20 per politician.
+10
Suihei Deloi on January 5, 2010 at 10:47 PM
Hey, California:
“…don’t let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy…”
(got to talk to them in their own language…)
landlines on January 5, 2010 at 11:25 PM
California should be allowed to go bankrupt.
This bailout by the Federal Government not only supersedes the intention of the Founding Fathers for separate States bound together by a small, limited Federal government, but it is also the ultimate in Socialism.
Basically, socialists (unions, leftist liberals and the like) are allowed to try and fail over and over again in states like California and Michigan, etc. and when they fail, the states that actually do produce, that actually stay within their means and allow private enterprise to thrive are forced to bail out the socialist ones.
For example, California is failing under the weight of it’s very large government and socialist union tendencies. And now, the Federal Government is bailing them out year after year with tax money taken from those of us who actually are not destroying our own economies (like the citizens of Texas, where I live). Basically, it’s the Atlas Shrugged scenario where those who actually produce are forced, across state lines, through the Federal Government to support the ever-failing socialist policies of other states over which we have absolutely no control.
I am tired of the Federal Government using my money to bail out the ever-failing policies of socialists in other States. Let them fail, burn and then pick up their pieces. Let them learn that they cannot do what they are doing forever. Otherwise, all they are doing is dragging the rest of the states down with them and, at the same time, abridging the entire design of the Constitution.
Theophile on January 6, 2010 at 12:00 AM
There’s talk on the news about how CA might have to layoff some state employees to help with the budget (I guess the state legislature is saying that work furlough’s aren’t legal).
THEY SHOULD’VE STARTED LAYING OFF STATE WORKERS OVER 20 YEARS AGO!
I really can’t believe the stupidity of this state gov.
If they lay off 50% of the gov employees i’d say that would be a good start.
RedbonePro on January 6, 2010 at 12:34 AM
Agreed marybel. Anyone remember what happened when New York came to DC years ago, hat in hand looking for bailout money? “Ford to New York…Drop Dead” was the headline and the old man lost state and eventually the election. Make no mistake, this will be a political maneuver and Obama will not let them fall.
As a side note, California state general obligation bonds right now for 20-30 year maturities pay about 5.7% tax free. That’s equivalent to a fully taxable 9.6% yield to maturity. That’s what I call a risk premium.
hot-heir on January 6, 2010 at 2:25 AM
Clarification…tax equivalent yield for someone in the top 35% bracket
hot-heir on January 6, 2010 at 2:26 AM