Taliban suicide bombing shatters CIA’s anti-AQ Afghan nerve center; Update: Bomber was a regular informant turned double agent
posted at 2:15 pm on January 2, 2010 by Allahpundit
I have no grand insights to offer but this is too awful and too … astounding, really, to be relegated to Headlines. These people were the tip of the American spear against jihadist kingpins in the Afghan/Pakistani border region, the innermost circle in a big Venn diagram that starts with the CIA, proceeds to the units tasked with finding intel on AQ, and ends with the elite charged with building the target list for drone operators. In one split second, that last circle was practically erased.
If you thought the biggest security breach of the past week was Flight 253, think again.
The Pakistani Taliban claimed that the bombing was carried out by a CIA operative who switched sides and offered to help the Taliban. The Associated Press quoted a commander from the Pakistan Taliban, Qari Hussain, who claimed the attack was in retaliation for the CIA’s drone attacks aimed at Taliban leaders across the border in Pakistan. The drone strikes have succeeded in killing several top Taliban commanders, including chief Baitullah Mehsud…
ABC News has learned that the bomber was invited into the heavily guarded camp as a possible informant, but wasn’t searched.
The bomber, who was dressed in an Afghan military uniform, was escorted to the gym for a meeting with a senior CIA debriefer, according to intelligence sources familiar with the incident. When the bomber was brought into the gym he blew himself up, killing seven and seriously injuring an additional six officers who had gathered there to wait for him.
Needless to say, it was almost certainly an inside job:
Several former intelligence officials described the attack in Afghanistan as
“devastating” to the agency. A number of the officers killed had been counterterrorism operatives since before the 9/11 attacks. The base played a critical role in the CIA’s significant operations in the country, including helping with drone attacks and informant networks in Pakistan…According to a military official who works on Afghan issues, Chapman has grown substantially in recent months and is a base for both military and intelligence operations. Because of its size, the officer said, the suicide bomber likely penetrated multiple layers of security before detonating the explosives…
Forward operating bases typically house hundreds of soldiers, and Afghan forces and private contractors also often live on such bases. But CIA outposts on these bases are usually small—no more than 15 or maybe 20 people, so 13 casualties is likely a majority of the CIA base personnel, said one former agency official.
Among the dead: The CIA’s base chief, a mother of three. My suspicion with sophisticated Taliban operations like this always runs to jihadbot elements in Pakistan’s intel agency, but corruption among Afghan security is a fact of life and the Journal says the base’s mission was an open secret among Afghan locals. It’s possible — and actually way more disturbing — to think that this was totally freelanced, with Afghan “allies” inside the base either bought off or coopted by the Taliban to look the other way at security checkpoints. The question is, why now? They’ve had every incentive to hit the base over the past eight years. It’d be interesting to know how many attacks have been attempted over time or whether some sort of change was made recently to security that might have invited an attempt.
I’ll leave you on a positive note: The revenge has already begun.
Update: Maybe it wasn’t an inside job after all. Maybe the bomber was simply so trusted by base security that they waved him through — unbeknownst to them, as a newly minted Taliban double agent.
The informant was a Pakistani and a member of the Wazir tribe from the Pakistani tribal area North Waziristan, according to the same source. The base security director, an Afghan named Arghawan, would pick up the informant at the Ghulam Khan border crossing and drive him about two hours into Forward Operating Base Chapman, from where the CIA operates.
Because he was with Arghawan, the informant was not searched, the source says. Arghawan also died in the attack…
At least 13 officers gathered in the base’s gym to talk with the informant, suggesting he was highly valued. His prior visits to the base and his ability to get so close to so many officers also suggests that he had already provided the agency with valuable intelligence that had proven successful, former intelligence officials say…
“The Soviet Union during the Cold War, the Cubans during the Cold War were able to run double agents against the CIA very successfully,” says Clarke. “But for a non-nation state to be able to do this — for the Haqqani network of the Taliban to be able to do this — represents a huge increase in the sophistication of the enemy.”
Yeah, no kidding. Until now, I figured the punishment for anyone caught by the Taliban assisting the CIA was beheading, not reprogramming. I wonder if they made the guy do it by threatening to kill his family or if they really did flip him. Just like I wonder how much bad info the CIA’s getting right now from other informants who have gone bad.
As for the mystery of why the Taliban hit the base now instead of eight years ago, the Journal has the answer. Turns out this was their own version of a strike on one of the enemy’s big fish:
“We attacked on that particular day because we knew the woman who was leading the team” was there, the commander said.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Report: Oversight on IRS targeting came from Washington all along

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5
So you are saying that NO amendments have ever been expanded to mean more than when they were written?
melle1228 on January 22, 2013 at 8:09 PM
Assuming that Roe v. Wade is overturned, however that may happen, the issue would return to the states.
The argument here turns on whether the federal government would continue to have a role in the criminalization and prosecution of abortion after that point.
Of course they have. It happens all the time, but the conservative judicial philosophy is that it shouldn’t, hence the continued debate on judicial activism and overrreach, the Constitution as a “living document”, etc.
Armin Tamzarian on January 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
Guns, god and gays. The three Gs.
And the social cons are losing on all fronts. It will take awhile for those wars to be over, but in 50 years or so, social cons will be in the very small minority and those items will not even appear as topics in America. Eventually, they will become as disconnected from the country as Fred Phelps.
Must suck to be angry all the time these days. Angry at your own country. Angry at your president. Angry at your neighbors. Angry at the world, actually. But like I said, they have an ace up their sleeve, these social cons. And their ace is an omnipotent being who agrees with them on all these important issues, and who will descend from the clouds and smite everyone – or just about everyone. And they so look forward to it – the deaths of billions. The rivers will run red they are promised. But not with their blood of course. Because their god agrees with them, they get a pass. And naturally, their god also is the only god in town. Everyone else’s god is a figment of the imagination.
Must be sweet. When you’re not angry, that is.
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM
It was just as dumb the first time you posted it. Excitement by repetition?
tom daschle concerned on January 22, 2013 at 8:24 PM
Lots of laughter. Just for insight, I clicked on your name, and – yup- it goes to a whacky evangelical website. Even tried to hijack my browser. LOL.
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:30 PM
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM
ROFLMAO. And in 50 years the utopia you think you are ushering in…won’t be. Know why? Because you’re a phucking idiot. Take the change and shove it up your ass.
HumpBot Salvation on January 22, 2013 at 8:30 PM
davidk on January 22, 2013 at 8:31 PM
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM
Actually your whole rant sounds a little angry. Are you projecting?
melle1228 on January 22, 2013 at 8:36 PM
Utopianism is the delusion of liberals and the religious. Realistic people do not expect to usher in anything close to a utopia. A functioning federal government with well-defined boundaries vis-a-vis its citizens and states is the best anyone can hope for.
Armin Tamzarian on January 22, 2013 at 8:37 PM
INC on January 22, 2013 at 8:39 PM
Utopia belongs to the Left, not to the religious, if by religious you mean Christians.
INC on January 22, 2013 at 8:40 PM
Wow, sweetheart…you need a mirror and apparently a hug. I think you understand nothing about those whom you mock, and it seems to me you don’t even want to try to understand that we are not angry. We are afraid of what soulless, gutless, clueless people like you are doing to this once great nation.
redmama on January 22, 2013 at 8:42 PM
redmama on January 22, 2013 at 8:42 PM
A whole lot of projection from that one.
HumpBot Salvation on January 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM
.
Prosecution should remain right where it is today for murder.
Local, local, local. Depending on a given set of circumstances surrounding a particular murder, it could go to the state.
As far as I’m concerned, implied criminalization of abortion begins with the Declaration Of Independence, but the Fourteenth Amendment goes beyond “implied” to definitive.
listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 8:46 PM
.
I don’t hardly think any of that is true, but I still defend your right to say it.
listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM
Hmmm … I don’t think you actually know any evangelical Christians. Even with fundamentalists, the judgment you speak of is something their theology tells them they are to hope is forstalled so that all can be “saved.” You really do have a cartoonish view of others. I think you need to see that most people are more complicated than your simple characterizations.
studentofhistory on January 22, 2013 at 8:52 PM
I think it’s great that the country is moving away from the social conservative nonsense. This poll made my day. Eventually, the two political ideologies vying for the White House will be social democrat vs. libertarian. The GOP will be dead. The social cons will go back under the rock from which they came – relegated to standing on street corners with signs proclaiming that their angry god is gonna punish America. Fred Phelps is a pioneer. You wait. lol.
Guns, god, and gays will be as relevant in 50 years as the Temperance movement, Suffrage, and Prohibition.
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM
keep the change on January 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM
Still laughing at you scooter. Repeating it 3 times isn’t gonna make it true or even interesting.
HumpBot Salvation on January 22, 2013 at 8:56 PM
.
I can’t speak for other religions, but there’s no excuse for Christians believing in a “utopia” on this side of the “Second Coming”.
Jesus warned things would get rougher in the “last days”, and in the next breath He said not to panic over it, because He forewarned us it is coming.
Also, I’m not even sure the word “utopia” applies to what Adam and Eve had in The Garden of Eden, before the “falling away.”
listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 9:02 PM
.
But feel free to keep saying it anyway, because we need the amusement.
listens2glenn on January 22, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Oh, oh … history lesson time! I love this. The temperance movement and prohibition were started by the religious AND the progressives. Both were a result of a combination of New England puritanism (Southern religious groups had much less problem with booze – hence the combination of moonshine, fast cars and Southern Baptists that birthed NASCAR) and progressives who saw drunkeness as a blight on “civilized society” – kind of like how progressives today want to restrict what you eat or if you can own a gun. The New England puritans who were most enthusiastic about temperance and prohibition were the Congregationalists (today known as Unitarians) and Northern Presbyterians (today known as Presbyterians USA) – you know, the liberal groups.
As for the Suffrage movement, that too was a combination of religious and progressives … and they won. The arguments against womens suffrage came from intellectuals as much as from religious conservatives. Women weren’t thought to have the mental capacity to vote or were too emotional. These weren’t religious reasons – in fact, they were backed up by the “science” of the day. So, come back when you have a better grasp of history.
studentofhistory on January 22, 2013 at 9:39 PM
You noticed that too. KTC is a deranged hater and bigot.
CW on January 22, 2013 at 10:04 PM
There is a way that seems right to a man, but the end thereof is death.
Our nation is slouching into technologized paganism. If America thinks that unborn children are not human unless they are wanted, how long before that particular class of sub-human becomes chattel for slaughter? We sacrifice them to our convenience; why not sacrifice them to science and progress?
spmat on January 22, 2013 at 10:04 PM
Gonorrhea, Government and benGhazi:
The Libtards are losing on all three G’s
SparkPlug on January 22, 2013 at 10:15 PM
That is the direction that most “progressive” nations go. Once the masses simply become numbers without value, they can be disposed of for the convenience of those who are of “value.” Hence the Nazi disposal of “mouth breathers” (i.e., infirm, mentally retarded, blind, etc.). I noticed on Drudge that Sir Attenborough is accusing humanity of being a disease again. Such an enlightened man … . The funny thing is that many people support such nonsense because they think they will be in the “valued group.” Many intellectuals thought that when Russia became a soviet state. They found out that when we only value specific groups, the groups valued are apt to change. Lenin and Stalin killed many an intellectual and university professor because they were not “valuable” to the state. Today, it’s the unborn. Tomorrow, infirm, the old and the sick. Then the politically undesireables. The absurdity of it is that it has all happened before, but profressives like KTC never seem to learn.
studentofhistory on January 22, 2013 at 10:28 PM
There is only ONE “alternative” that’s ever mentioned: ABORTION. Adoption is the OTHER alternative to parenting an “unplanned” child, and PP fights against having to mention it. Too much money to be made tossing human lives into the trash.
JannyMae on January 22, 2013 at 10:39 PM
I went to the nearby upscale French restaurant where a country music band was singing songs in praise of gay marriage. I went up to the singer and said Happy Roe v Wade day. I’m not sure he knew what I was talking about, but I’m pretty sure he would have agreed. This is what is positive in America in 2013. The microbrew beers were excellent.
thuja on January 22, 2013 at 10:41 PM
Sorry, I’m not buying what they’re selling in this poll. The trend has been going the opposite way with the advent of ultrasound, and the education of people who have realized that they have been lied to for decades, about it being “only a clump of cells” that they are murdering.
JannyMae on January 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM
I’m a little confused by your statement. I think your saying it is positive that in 2013 we have gay marriage being celebrated by a country music band in a restaurant and that we have Roe v. Wade. Is that correct? Well, I think the reaction of the singer was more aproposo to our day in age. The singer was uninformed about what you were talking about and probably would have “agreed” with you only because it is the in thing to do, not because he had heard the pros and cons and come to an informed decision. That to me, is the hallmark of our “age” and it is anything but positive.
I’ll agree with you, however, that the microbrew beers have improved. Not sure I would use the word “excellent,” but they have improved.
studentofhistory on January 22, 2013 at 10:47 PM
I agree with your negativity about people being thoughtless, and that thoughtlessness is not any less common now than in Athens at the time of Socrates. Where I disagree with you is that I do think the singer understood the issue of gay marriage fairly well. He did not write lyrics mindlessly about this issue. But I suspect he would write lyrics mindlessly about economic issues. I fear that what I’m writing here is not poetic, and couldn’t be poetic. I suppose Ann Coulter could find some way to make the observation that singers tend to be completely clueless about economic issues amusing. But what if not? Perhaps these dull factoids are important, but can’t be made entertaining? How do we fix the situation?
Dude, I had excellent beers tonight.
thuja on January 22, 2013 at 11:04 PM
I was referring more to the Roe v. Wade issue. As to the beers, do tell which were excellent. It’s not a microbrew, but if you haven’t had a Tripel Karmeliet (great Belgian – I had one on Saturday), you haven’t lived.
studentofhistory on January 22, 2013 at 11:30 PM
Meh. A poll of 1,000 people with a margin of error of 3.1% or so.
Well, we really feel bad for people like you.
Actually, there’s a growing movement in Christendom toward Preterism and away from Futurism. (I am a futurist, though.)
Besides that, the joy we feel at the Second Coming will be in seeing Christ; at that point we literally will no longer care about what happens in and to the world.
Ha! It’s funny because it’s true!
cavalier973 on January 23, 2013 at 12:12 AM
.
.
DUDES !
Brewing is an art (like cooking), and as such is “in the eye of the beholder”.
listens2glenn on January 23, 2013 at 12:13 AM
.
Ain’t it, though ? ! … : )
listens2glenn on January 23, 2013 at 12:16 AM
You glean a lot from a small poll sampling. And your gloating over progressive ‘victories’ will be a very short lived thing.
zoyclem on January 23, 2013 at 7:19 AM
Celebrating death. You said more about yourself than you realized with that statement. You are little more than a savage.
zoyclem on January 23, 2013 at 7:22 AM
Baby killing’s just so much fun,right ladies?We should rename convenience stores Quick Kill,and y’all can just do drive-by abortions.Reproductive rights,my ass!Lack of responsibility and lack of respect for human life-period.No excuses!
redware on January 23, 2013 at 8:58 AM
The unfortunate truth is this: However wrong abortion really is, without it the country would be crawling with ten of millions more welfare recipients, socialists, democrats, and other undesirables. What is left of our Constitution would have already been shredded, and the USA would have been no more. Careful what we wish for.
redhead on January 23, 2013 at 9:00 AM
.
False conclusions.
listens2glenn on January 23, 2013 at 9:10 AM
Problem is that Demoncrats have found ways to replace their dead would’ve-been voters via incentives to breed randomly and via illegal immigration. If those two spigots were turned off, all they’d be left with is siphoning off young conservatives and the lake would dry up quite a bit.
Unfortunately, as it is, the shredding of our Constitution is only being delayed. Not stopped.
MelonCollie on January 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM
I hope you took a Midol and layed down, you seemed to be having a hard day.
itsspideyman on January 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5