Ron Paul on the airline plot: “They’re terrorists because we’re occupiers!”

posted at 10:00 pm on December 29, 2009 by Allahpundit

I’ve already written about how his isolationist garbage leads inexorably to nonsense like this, so let me just add two points. First, and most obviously, there is no U.S. occupation of Yemen or Nigeria. The only way the airline plot is a reaction to U.S. “occupation” is if you accept the jihadist premise that there are no Arab/Muslim nation-states but rather only one Islamic caliphate waiting to be born. Only in that way does the U.S. occupation of Iraq warrant a reprisal from, say, a Pakistani or Yemeni. And yet, needless to say, if Britain was attacked tomorrow and Obama pledged U.S. forces to assist in the reprisal, Paul would be the first guy to scream that we should scrupulously observe national boundaries and not go fighting another country’s battles for it.

Second, as usual, his facts are wrong. He uncritically accepts Abdulmutallab’s assertion that the bomb plot was retaliation for the U.S. airstrike on jihadi camps in Yemen. Not so: As Jake Tapper explained yesterday, this turd had already been mobilized and had even bought his Northwest ticket before we struck. Purely and simply, America’s Greatest Patriot is parroting propaganda cooked up by jihadist pieces of sh*t because it happens to fit his insane foreign policy agenda. Support him and his disciples at your peril.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

“One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.” Most reasonable people could see the point there, I would hope.

This is a typical Allahpudit knee-jerk response, just what you’d expect from the Palinbot wing of the party. Long on emotion, short on reason.

voxpopuli on December 30, 2009 at 2:51 AM

Just what you would expect…typical knee-jerk response.

That “ones mans freedom….” is the most trite and over used statement to excuse immoral, self-righteous, aberrant behavior there is.
I think every terrorist has that memorized, as he beheads an innocent victim…or bombs a school bus, or tries to destroy a plane full of innocent victims….meanwhile hiding his “cell” beneath a hospital….
You are a fool to use such a quote….at “used” fool, useful for propaganda…weak minds are easily bent with a slogan or two.

right2bright on December 30, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Paul’s leftist logic comes from Chicago University Professor: Robert Pape, who wrote a book called “Suicide Terrorism” and tried to prove that the only reason they blow themselves up to attack us is because their countries are occupied by us.

In this case Nigeria? oh, the Caliphate which they of course consider to be a Global Thing, if not yet Islam its their duty through Jihad to make it Islam. Some facts Paul and Pape refuse to consider.

Robert Spencer and others haved debunked Robert Pape multiple times.

jp on December 30, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Amazing how Ben Stein is so secure in his arguments that he plays the cheap anti-semite card. That’s typical of his type, the hardcore neocons.

The Dean on December 30, 2009 at 5:39 AM

Not unlike the hardcore lefties and their race card, isn’t it?

Dark-Star on December 30, 2009 at 9:48 AM

Time for Ron Paul to retire. He’s 74 or 75. You people down in Brazoria and Matagorda counties, find someone else. It’s a safe “R” district.

chris999 on December 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM

Part of Galveston County, too.
Don’t blame me, I voted for Chris Peden in the primary last time. Ron Paul is a loony toon.

BobOfTexas on December 30, 2009 at 9:55 AM

And the Army has had Warrant Officers for a long while….but…

No, I was referring to commissioned officers, during RVN anyway. In fact, one could be a Captain at 21, although that was rare. That’s probably not the case now.

MB4 on December 30, 2009 at 12:40 AM

You do realize most of us warrant officers accept commission status when we make CW3?

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Time for Ron Paul to retire. He’s 74 or 75. You people down in Brazoria and Matagorda counties, find someone else. It’s a safe “R” district.

chris999 on December 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM
Part of Galveston County, too.
Don’t blame me, I voted for Chris Peden in the primary last time. Ron Paul is a loony toon.

BobOfTexas on December 30, 2009 at 9:55 AM

There is a Tea Party Organizer down their running against him, name is Tim Grainey. If he got financing I think he could win, but would take alot of money to get messages like this thread out.

Peden had hardly any funding though and still got 30% of Primary vote. I think with funding getting over 50% wouldn’t be too hard

jp on December 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM

http://www.graneyforcongress.com/

We need to get behind this guy, as important as taking back congress is stopping the paultard train from aiding the Left and Jihadist anymore than they already have.

jp on December 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM

My Grandfather talked of shelling Villages in WW1 France…

Unless he was aiming behind the lines, what’s the problem with that? It wasn’t all trenches and meadows…

Amazing how Ben Stein is so secure in his arguments that he plays the cheap anti-semite card. That’s typical of his type, the hardcore neocons.

The Dean on December 30, 2009 at 5:39 AM

I think he’s interpreting Paul’s comment that “We’re occupiers” as referring to Israel.

But this specific comment I think was akin to saying, “One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.” Most reasonable people could see the point there, I would hope.

What, that no matter how right you are, somebody’s gonna be stupid? Charles Manson had people thinking he was the Voice of God, does that mean we gotta pause before we lock up Charles Manson for murder? What is your point? That there’s no such thing as a terrorist or a freedom fighter?

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Ron Paul is right! We are occupiers. We occupy our country, we occupy the planet, heck, if we would just up and leave, the whole planet would drink aktar cola and sing…
/s (do I really need it?)

TinMan13 on December 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM

his insane foreign policy agenda

And for the 500th time, it’s not just “Ron Paul’s foreign policy agenda.” It’s both the libertarian and paleocon factions’ foreign policy views. As a matter of fact, it was Bush’s as well and, considering that, it’s safe to assume you all thought he was an “isolationist kook” in ’99, and cast your votes for Gore.

Geez, the neos act like they invented conservatism, and anyone who disagrees with their idiotic foreign interventionism and their ubercostly perpetual nation-building wars have no business being in “the big tent.”

Bush got one thing right; he absolutely “redefined the Republican Party,” and not in a good way.

What’s really ironic is, you people go on and on about jihadists forcing Islam onto the rest of the world, but you refuse to see how you are doing the same, by forcing democracy onto them via war. We are not just “killing terrorists” — we are forcing a political system onto them.

“Anti-Semite” is for the right what “racist” is for the left. Shame on you, Ben Stein, and all of you who use that BS accusation as a way to shut down anyone who has the unmitigated gall to disagree with the great YOU.

Rae on December 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM

jp…you still don’t get it…

How are those wars working out for the Republican party? Or is it Conservative Party now? Or is it the Tea Party? I can’t keep track any longer.

You and your kind have learned nothing from 2006 when the Republican Party lost the house and the senate and subsequently drove the economy into the ground while taking away our liberty. Now we have the Dems in charge who are making things much worse and some of you are seeing the light.

Ron Paul was right. You know it. Right on the economy and right on the need to end the wars that are killing our loved ones and enriching the one’s who support them….you don’t see Obama ending them either…as the Left got us into wars…they love war too…but it was the right who always got us out of wars.

What changed?

Read Rothbard’s “Betrayal of the America Right”

Does it make sense to kill 5,000 of our men and women fighting wars to make amends for the killing of about half that amount? Let alone all of the innocent victims on the other side who turn into terrorists because we’re killing there families? If your family was killed by an occupying nation, how would you take it? Would you mid them killing your neighbor’s family too?

The haters of Ron Paul can never attack his message of limited government, sound money, liberty and non-intervention. But hey…isn’t that what the Old Republican Party used to stand for? The Party that got us out of Korea and Vietnam?

Again, what changed?

Fed Up on December 30, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Rae on December 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM

I have the bad feeling your points will be drowned out by cries of “BOOOSH-HATER!!!”

…which is sad, because you’re right on the money.

Dark-Star on December 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Again, what changed?

Fed Up on December 30, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Simple. Somebody finally managed to sucker-punch the US on it’s home ground, also specifically targeting civilians and financial institutions instead of military installations.

Despite our undeniable success at toppling evil regimes, the mindset of enforcing ‘democracy’ on a half-beaten foe who wouldn’t know what the hell to do with it seems to be stubbornly remain in the minds of many.

Meanwhile, the terrorist near-misses just keep on coming, and we don’t seem to be able to do anything about it. Our border security remains pathetic, and financial collapse caused by inept politicians threatens to destroy all the progress we’ve made in the foreign field.

Dark-Star on December 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM

Useful idiot.

You’re being too kind. Perhaps it’s your attempt at celebrating the spirit of Christmas.

Have a happy and prosperous 2010!

oldleprechaun on December 30, 2009 at 11:10 AM

I linked back to this post. Thanks for exposing Ron Paul. I’m a Kentuckian for Bill Johnson.

http://genuinegopmom.blogspot.com/2009/12/ron-paul-blames-terrorist-attack-on.html

gocatholic on December 30, 2009 at 11:12 AM

“One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.” Most reasonable people could see the point there, I would hope.

This is a typical Allahpudit knee-jerk response, just what you’d expect from the Palinbot wing of the party. Long on emotion, short on reason.

voxpopuli on December 30, 2009 at 2:51 AM

Unless the “freedom fighter” is fighting against freedom. The stated aim of these azzhats is to subjugate the world under their worldwide caliphate. They’ve said it over and over and over again.

To ignore that fact at this late date while repeating the enemy’s nonsensical propaganda, is at best, willful stupidity.

RadClown on December 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM

… Greatest Patriot is parroting propaganda cooked up by jihadist pieces of sh*t because…

That’s AllahP talking. He makes me smile.

bridgetown on December 30, 2009 at 11:22 AM

What’s really ironic is, you people go on and on about jihadists forcing Islam onto the rest of the world, but you refuse to see how you are doing the same, by forcing democracy onto them via war. We are not just “killing terrorists” — we are forcing a political system onto them.

“Anti-Semite” is for the right what “racist” is for the left. Shame on you, Ben Stein, and all of you who use that BS accusation as a way to shut down anyone who has the unmitigated gall to disagree with the great YOU.

Rae on December 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM

there’s a lot to comment on in this quote, but I’d just like to inquire why it’s such a terrible thing to think or act upon the idea of “…maybe if we set them free from the rape-loving, acid-throwing backwater sadists with a stranglehold on their lives, they might not attack us in the future. Maybe, if we free them…”

Forcing freedom onto a people who’ve spent all their lives in subjugation is just a terrible frakking crime, isn’t it.

KinleyArdal on December 30, 2009 at 11:24 AM

“As Jake Tapper explained yesterday, this turd had already been mobilized and had even bought his Northwest ticket before we struck.”

Watchit, AP, you could get banned by Ed “The Hammer” Morrissey and spend an eternity in troll purgatory with SimpleSimon!

VoyskaPVO on December 30, 2009 at 11:28 AM

The fundamental hatred of freedom and human dignity by the Paulfilth is her manifested by their defense of those who openly and plainly call for the destruction of the Western Enlightenment humanism this country was built on.

Their moral and intellectual willful self-castration is disgusting to see.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 11:32 AM

“here”

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Actually, after reading this I think Ron Paul is dangerous.

ORconservative on December 30, 2009 at 11:33 AM

“As Jake Tapper explained yesterday, this turd had already been mobilized and had even bought his Northwest ticket before we struck.”

Watchit, AP, you could get banned by Ed “The Hammer” Morrissey and spend an eternity in troll purgatory with SimpleSimon!

VoyskaPVO

Nah, one rule for the elites, another for everyone else.

Grow Fins on December 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM

“What is your point? That there’s no such thing as a terrorist or a freedom fighter?”

Exactly, that is what they deny by their evil willful collaboration with the anti-liberty jihadis. George Washington=Osama Bin Laden to these morally retarded relativists.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 11:35 AM

How is that Afghan escalation working for you now? Are you starting to realize that controlling Afghanistan is not a prerequisite for perpetrating a terror attack. They can be planned anywhere

snoopicus on December 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Grow Fins on December 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Amazing to hear that from a sycophantic lefty.

Unless I’m greatly mistaken, man, you were utterly whooshed and missed the playful sarcasm in the comment you quoted.

KinleyArdal on December 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM

This typifies why I will never support him.

Yephora on December 30, 2009 at 11:41 AM

“Forcing freedom onto a people who’ve spent all their lives in subjugation is just a terrible frakking crime, isn’t it.”

The one thing that Lincoln got right in his life:

“Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VIII, “Speech to One Hundred Fortieth Indiana Regiment” (March 17, 1865), p. 361.

It goes for him and hypocritical filth like Paul, DiLorenzo and the League of the South fascists.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 11:44 AM

Good luck diverting attention to taking out Ron and Rand Paul instead of Democrats. That’ll cost you seats for the precious Repub majority, and we’ll still win each of them. We’ll out-fundraise you guys and leave you in the cold for sure.

The Dean on December 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM

How is that Afghan escalation working for you now? Are you starting to realize that controlling Afghanistan is not a prerequisite for perpetrating a terror attack. They can be planned anywhere
snoopicus on December 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM

So…if they can blow up one plane with 50 guys, we might as well let them have a country of 30 million? Cause that’s what you just said.

Does it make sense to kill 5,000 of our men and women fighting wars to make amends for the killing of about half that amount? Let alone all of the innocent victims on the other side who turn into terrorists because we’re killing there families? If your family was killed by an occupying nation, how would you take it? Would you mid them killing your neighbor’s family too?

We don’t kill our own people, asshat.
Nobody innocent turns into a terrorist. Nobody.
Even if the “Ahmad the Terrorist Dentist” fallacy were true (“Ahmad would have been a dentist…but the Americans came…so…”)–and the arrest of ANOTHER OPEC princeling shoulda exploded that– so what? They have a limited population. Wear them down.

Geez, the neos act like they invented conservatism, and anyone who disagrees with their idiotic foreign interventionism and their ubercostly perpetual nation-building wars have no business being in “the big tent.”

It’s plan B, a humane alternative to genocide with atomic weapons. You may recall Republican support for the MX and the Pershing II and the 600 ship Navy? Was that about nonintervention? Was that neocon kookeration?
Yeah you are not in my circus. Don’t presume that we’re allies and we owe you support. We don’t. We won’t.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Watchit, AP, you could get banned by Ed “The Hammer” Morrissey and spend an eternity in troll purgatory with SimpleSimon!

VoyskaPVO

Did Simple Simon get “the” boot?

GrowFins, you’re lucky you didn’t get the boot the night you lost it and became the Hot Air noted liar and comment fabricator.

And before you say crap, yeah, I should have banned once or twice myself.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Good luck diverting attention to taking out Ron and Rand Paul instead of Democrats. That’ll cost you seats for the precious Repub majority, and we’ll still win each of them. We’ll out-fundraise you guys and leave you in the cold for sure.
The Dean on December 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM

You’re just as bad for the country as Obama. ANY Anti-American agenda is bad for America. And pretending deep objective neutrality when Al Qaeda comes to kill Americans on American soil is working against America.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM

simplesimon/capitulus/Deb Frisch got the Hammer Saturday night for going off the rails on a couple of threads.

kingsjester on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Did Simple Simon get “the” boot?

He apparently mocked a Scientologist for his religion.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Good luck diverting attention to taking out Ron and Rand Paul instead of Democrats. That’ll cost you seats for the precious Repub majority, and we’ll still win each of them. We’ll out-fundraise you guys and leave you in the cold for sure.

The Dean on December 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Ron Paul is harmless because everyone knows he’s a loon. He gives the military undeserved black eyes all the time but we’re used to it.

BTW Ron, we never occupied Yemen. The only crime we ever committed against them was having the audacity to dock a ship there. But they showed us by God what the peaceful Muslims do to we evil occupiers.

But you know, I’d rather be anything than a Ron Paul follower. It’s clear they have projected this political tenet of not getting involved in world affairs, (even when we’re attacked) based solely of this horrific fear that they might be called to fight themselves. Shame really. What is it like to live the fearful life of a coward you Paultards?

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:09 PM

I guess I’m not alone in wondering why these bombers keep trying to get on airplanes, when they could do as much damage in a terminal. What’s to stop some fiend from picking a day when terminals are packed, letting a buddy drop him and his big suitcases off at the terminal, then wheeling them inside, where hundreds of people are packed into lines like sardines — and then detonating the bags full of explosives? Is anyone scrutinizing luggage or passengers as they first enter the terminal? Not at the airport near me.

I remember the massacre at the El Al counter in LA years ago, so killing people inside terminals isn’t new, but I marvel that the bad guys are still trying to get on the planes.

And whenever I see a jet coming in “low and slow,” I hope nobody decides to pick one off from a vacant lot or rooftop, or a nondescript vehicle. I think we’re living on borrowed time before such incidents become common. Shoulder-fired missles are around, I suppose, but a high-powered rifle could be just as lethal.

If either of those scenarios becomes common, making people take off their shoes at security checks will seem pretty quaint.

KyMouse on December 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM

How does Paul and his Paulnut followers explain the Muslim genocide in Sudan? Are African animist tribes “occupying” Islamic lands? What’s with Al-Qaeda’s Jihad against the Dali lama? Is he “occupying” some Muslim land?

And what “Muslim land” is there anyway? Muslims are occupying every land they own now, they conquered those areas and even now suppress the non-Arabized populations. So why aren’t Christians in those lands terrorists?

Anyone who thinks Islamic Imperialism stems from outside forces is ignorant of Islamic history and theology. Theologically ALL of the world once belonged to Muslims because the first people god created were Muslims. That’s why converts to Islam refer to themselves as “reverts” as in they reverted to the faith of Adam and Eve. By that logic they have a claim to America. I guess the Paulnuts will be willing to stop “occupying” their favorite head shops to stop terrorism.

There is a theory being circulated by Muslims that America was settled by Muslims 1000 years prior to Columbus. It literally suggests that this is Islamic land. It is quite popular in Jihadi forums. To keep them from being terrorists will we cede some of America to them?

Rob Taylor on December 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM

kingsjester on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

She sits quietly in the darkest corner of the dayroom. Her arms a little cramped; a little sweaty and feeling of the tiny needles as the flesh falls asleep and then reawakens. She complains to the nurse the straps are to tight. The nurse ignores her. She says it again but this time a bit louder thinking the nurse might not have heard. The nurse never lifts her her head but continues writing in the chart in her hand. She shrieks and twists until the other patients are uncomfortable too, knowing that the nurse will come this time. She grins as the nurse finally approaches and stares at her in the face until she again become quiet. “Deb, if you want me to unstrap you when registration on your little web site opens again, you better behave.”

She smiles. “False, tricksy little Race Fanses”

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Everytime when I start to warm up to Dr. Paul he opens up hia damn pie hole and ruins it by saying something so rediculous.

You do not get another chance. DONE!!!!

Winebabe on December 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM

He apparently mocked a Scientologist for his religion.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Huh, their power does reach wide and far.

How does Paul and his Paulnut followers explain the Muslim genocide in Sudan? Are African animist tribes “occupying” Islamic lands?
Rob Taylor on December 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Easy, they don’t. What the natives do to each other is none of our business according to them. All we have to do is hunker down in Fortress America and all will be well. Yeah I know, it makes about as much sense as liberal appeasement ueber alles foreign policy.

jarodea on December 30, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Put simply, Ron Paul (nor any other appeaser) understands the following:

If you’re a non-believer, Jesus still loves you.
– allah wants you dead.

It is quranic fact, and it cannot be disputed.

Making excuses for what motivates jihadis is, at best, the personification of stupidity.

Read Trifkovic.
Read Spencer.

These people (jihadis) were doing this LOOONG before the U.S. came to be, and LOOONG before ‘mean ol’ Bush’ was in office.

Buy a clue, or get out of the fight, but don’t expect me or anyone else who has a brain about this to defend you when they (the jihadis) come knocking at your door demanding that you covert or they’ll kill you.

Talismen on December 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Everytime when I start to warm up to Dr. Paul he opens up hia damn pie hole and ruins it by saying something so rediculous.

You do not get another chance. DONE!!!!

Winebabe on December 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM

What has he ever said that wasn’t bat crazy insane? Do you just like his looks or the crease of his pants or something? I don’t mean to sound mocking but I’m just wonderring how anyone could “warm up” to ron paul (who isn’t bat crazy insane themselves of course).

jarodea on December 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM

GO PAUL!

Spathi on December 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Intrepid on December 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM

Nope – he’s the crzy uncle that keeps you from bringing a date to family gatherings until they’re locked in and can’t run screaming from your gene pool.

katiejane on December 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Easy, they don’t. What the natives do to each other is none of our business according to them. All we have to do is hunker down in Fortress America and all will be well. Yeah I know, it makes about as much sense as liberal appeasement ueber alles foreign policy.

jarodea on December 30, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Precisely! And it supports their number two goal which is to never take up arms for anything which in turn supports their number one goal which is to never be put in the position where they might have to fight.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM

Hey Ron paul, I dont see German or Japan terrorists bombing any planes do you? A terrorist is a terrorist, they can’t be reasoned or bargained with and they will not stop until you are DEAD.

jaboba on December 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM

“What is it like to live the fearful life of a coward you Paultards?”

Samuel Adams has the answer:

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM

GO AWAY, PAUL!

Spathi on December 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Fixed that for you!!

And of course, on this thread all the usual Paultards show up to cheerlead the Neo-Nazi loon and his equally anti-Semitic, anti-American son running for the Senate.

Jenfidel on December 30, 2009 at 12:46 PM

After prolonged occupations of Afghanistan and especially Iraq terrorist recruitment skyrocketed and it became more difficult for Middle Eastern nations to cooperate with us on matters of terrorism than it was after 9/11.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM

“…may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Not to mock founder Samual Adams, but I wish Paultards and the Pauls were not my countrymen!
Almost all of what they want for my country is un-American.
Unless you like the United States of the KKK and Stormfront.

Jenfidel on December 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Paulfilth=1776 Loyalists

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM

After prolonged occupations of Afghanistan and especially Iraq terrorist recruitment skyrocketed and it became more difficult for Middle Eastern nations to cooperate with us on matters of terrorism than it was after 9/11.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM

BULLSH*T.
Al Queda is down to their B or C Team now.
We’ve decimated their ranks.
And countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Pakistan are working with us that were not working with us before.

Jenfidel on December 30, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Paulfilth=1776 LoyalistsTrotskyites in Stalinist Russia

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM

FIFY, too.

Jenfidel on December 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Hey Ron paul, I dont see German or Japan terrorists bombing any planes do you? A terrorist is a terrorist, they can’t be reasoned or bargained with and they will not stop until you are DEAD.

jaboba on December 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Precisely. What we are fighting is an international movement not much unlike the international Communist movement prior to its capturing the governance of Russia and turning it into the Soviet Union. We don’t want the jihadis to capture, say, Saudi Arabia and form their Caliphate just so we have an actual duly-constituted foreign power to which we can apply the antiquated laws of war (antiquated in assumptions, not intent).

We need to stop the jihadi ideology, just like we put a stop to Naziism in Germany, Fascism in Italy, and militancy in Japan. Such ideologies are obsessed with power over others, and will not willingly, quietly, or in any way peacefully surrender in the face of peaceful market-based ideology. You need to kill the fanatics, so that those who desire peace are free to pursue it.

Sekhmet on December 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM

“Not to mock founder Samual Adams, but I wish Paultards and the Pauls were not my countrymen!”

My point, exactly.

“Almost all of what they want for my country is un-American.”

From your mouth to God’s ear, sister.

“Unless you like the United States of the KKK and Stormfront.”

Yep, they always love to discredit REAL liberty for ALL humans by groveling before Southern slavery and equating the American Revolution with Al Queda.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM

OT:
from my email box:

MANHATTAN ALL HANDS BOX 786.

NYPD BOMB SQ INVESTIGATING A SUSPICIOUS VAN.

FD EVACUATING 4 TIMES SQ & 7 TIMES SQ.

LISTEN LIVE ON THEBRAVEST.COM.

Sekhmet on December 30, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Paul need to run for president again. There were only two republicans who vote against the Iraq occupation.

Ron Paul has shown insight again and again while most of his colleagues are dumb as&es

Spathi on December 30, 2009 at 12:53 PM

“What is it like to live the fearful life of a coward you Paultards?”

Samuel Adams has the answer:

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Where did the war Samuel Adams spoke of take place? What did the British call us? (Hint, begins with a T)

I have distanced my views from Ron over the years on foreign policy, but the thing that always annoys me about you folks is the absolute BS rhetoric in your arguments, at least the British and Romans didn’t go through these ridiculous rhetorical exercises, they knew exactly what they were and were not afraid to just say it out loud.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Paulfilth=1776 LoyalistsTrotskyites in Stalinist Russia

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM

FIFY, too.

Don’t insult Trotsky like that, he honestly hated the “bourgeois” concepts of individual liberty and universal human dignity and essence, unlike Paulfilth.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:54 PM

“I have distanced my views from Ron over the years on foreign policy, but the thing that always annoys me about you folks is the absolute BS rhetoric in your arguments, at least the British and Romans didn’t go through these ridiculous rhetorical exercises, they knew exactly what they were and were not afraid to just say it out loud.”

Yeah, George Washington specifically denounced John Locke and the Enlightenment while arranging for female circumcision for Martha.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM

After prolonged occupations of Afghanistan and especially Iraq terrorist recruitment skyrocketed and it became more difficult for Middle Eastern nations to cooperate with us on matters of terrorism than it was after 9/11.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Prolonged exposure to most liberal statements in the media and some choice words of appeasement from the likes of Ron Paul emboldened our enemies in both Iraq and Afghanistan causing untold casualties, death and destruction. Iraq was finally subdued despite Ron Paul and here’s to hoping he’ll shut the f*ck up until we can resolve Afghanistan.

Don’t worry though, you don’t have to go.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM

I love it when Ron Paul shows his inner moron.
`
Perhaps this time it will serve as a cautionary tale for the lemmings who love to flock after his insane arse.
`
If Ron Paul’s foreign policy were in force during the Cold War, we would be Soviet subjects today. The man doesn’t even believe we should have forces deployed outside our borders EXCEPT in an actual shooting war.
`
His life-long belief was in open borders without ANY restrictions on immigration. He campaigned for President under the LP banner on such a policy, consistent with LP doctrines, and espoused it for decades. Now, in recent years public attention to the issue has occasioned a 180-degree reversal from Mr. Paul . . . so much for the “man of principle” crapola, eh?
`
Oh, and his constant drumbeat over the decades about gold? He owns plenty of gold stocks, and his “economic policies” are designed to maximize his personal portfolio. But the Paulies have enough to crack them up for now – let’s leave his corruption for later, shall we?
`

Adjoran on December 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Where did the war Samuel Adams spoke of take place? What did the British call us? (Hint, begins with a T)

Colonial
Rebel
His Majesty’s American subjects

I’m drawing a blank

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM

“I love it when Ron Paul shows his inner moron.”

It’s always part of the shallow and ugly skull beneath his skin.

“If Ron Paul’s foreign policy were in force during the Cold War, we would be Soviet subjects today.”

…and they would blame our plight on the fact that we temporarily intervened in the Russian Civil War, no doubt.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 1:02 PM

“Not to mock founder Samual Adams, but I wish Paultards and the Pauls were not my countrymen!”

That was my point exactly, “tranquillity of servitude” is what they are all about.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Not unlike the hardcore lefties and their race card, isn’t it?

Dark-Star on December 30, 2009 at 9:48 AM

Ask Dean-O about how Hitler maybe did some bad stuff to somebody, probably. Then we’ll talk about the legitimacy of the cries of anti-semitism.

At any rate I think we could have stayed out of a war now and then and I think the nation building is more or less futile – or at the very least, far too costly.

This does not excuse the paulnuts from their highly selective history or their insane moral equivalence. Islam is not and never has been a peaceful religion. Muslims are only peaceful insofar as they ignore scholarly interpretations of their own doctrine.

On the other hand, I’m content to let them commence killing each other so long as they leave the west and Israel the hell alone. But – and this is the MOAB of buts – the minute they step out of line, we carpet bomb their crappy little countries so badly there won’t be two bricks left to stand on top of each other.

See, this whole “let’s be nice and everyone else will be nice to us” mentality? That works fine on a playground when you’re sharing your pudding with your friends. When there’s blood on the ground though, nobody cares. For better or worse the battle lines are drawn, and no amount of money or land will wipe that blood away.

To quote someone talking about a related topic, it’s kinda like this:

Spike: I just can’t take all this mamby-pamby boo-hooing about the bloody Indians.
Willow: Uh, the preferred term is…
Spike: You won. All right? You came in and you killed them and you took their land. That’s what conquering nations do. It’s what Caesar did, and he’s not goin’ around saying, “I came, I conquered, I felt really bad about it.” The history of the world is not people making friends. You had better weapons, and you massacred them. End of story.
Buffy: Well, I think the Spaniards actually did a lot of – Not that I don’t like Spaniards.
Spike: Listen to you. How you gonna fight anyone with that attitude?
Willow: We don’t wanna fight anyone.
Buffy: I just wanna have Thanksgiving.
Spike: Heh heh. Yeah… Good luck.
Willow: Well, if we could talk to him…
Spike: You exterminated his race. What could you possibly say that would make him feel better? It’s kill or be killed here. Take your bloody pick.
Xander: Maybe it’s the syphilis talking, but, some of that made sense.

TheUnrepentantGeek on December 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM

After prolonged occupations of Afghanistan and especially Iraq terrorist recruitment skyrocketed and it became more difficult for Middle Eastern nations to cooperate with us on matters of terrorism than it was after 9/11.

Asinine.Al-Qaeda had no problem recruiting for the ’93 WTC bombing or the terror attacks on us between then and 9/11. What middle eastern country was co-operating with us? The Saudis from which most the 9/11 terrorists came?

Islamism is ascending, the West is failing. If we don’t react strongly we will be destroyed which has been the goal of Wahhabism since it came into being (if Paulnuts read anything besides Prison Planet they could read Whahhabi tracts and see the real goal from our enemies own words)

It’s fairly ethnocentric to see Muslims as only reactive to us and not having agendas and desires that are self-motivated. It reminds me of when the truthers first appeared claiming “people who lived in caves” couldn’t fly planes even though the hijackers were Masters students and better educated than most of them. Paul and his supporters are stuck in a 19th century view of non-Europeans as harmless children.

Rob Taylor on December 30, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Precisely. What we are fighting is an international movement not much unlike the international Communist movement prior to its capturing the governance of Russia and turning it into the Soviet Union. We don’t want the jihadis to capture, say, Saudi Arabia and form their Caliphate just so we have an actual duly-constituted foreign power to which we can apply the antiquated laws of war (antiquated in assumptions, not intent).

We need to stop the jihadi ideology, just like we put a stop to Naziism in Germany, Fascism in Italy, and militancy in Japan. Such ideologies are obsessed with power over others, and will not willingly, quietly, or in any way peacefully surrender in the face of peaceful market-based ideology. You need to kill the fanatics, so that those who desire peace are free to pursue it.

Sekhmet on December 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM

not to mention the Caliphate would then control much of the Globalized World’s Oil Supply, kinda important.

Alexander Hamilton and other key founders mocked the idiots of their days who thought you could have Global Commerce without a military presence to defend it.

jp on December 30, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Precisely! And it supports their number two goal which is to never take up arms for anything which in turn supports their number one goal which is to never be put in the position where they might have to fight.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM

Too bad their number 1 goal doesn’t follow from their number 2 goal. On second thought the liberal appeasement ueber alles foreign policy may actually make slightly more sense than a ron-paulite foreign policy since at least the liberals recognize the reality that their is a world outside of Fortress America (even though everything they think after that is basically wrong).

jarodea on December 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Thomas Jefferson making his case for War with the Barbary Pirates: i.e. Muslim Jihadist

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. [2] [3]

-Jefferson

I guess Ron Paul would think Jefferson was an evil warmonger working in the aide of the “International Bankers”

jp on December 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM

“Alexander Hamilton and other key founders mocked the idiots of their days who thought you could have Global Commerce without a military presence to defend it.”

…and Jefferson, the beau ideal of Paultards, actually fought against Islamo-terrorism of 1805 vintage. Shh, don’t tell the little self-lobotomized morons.

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 1:10 PM

“I guess Ron Paul would think Jefferson was an evil warmonger working in the aide of the “International Bankers””

Great minds think alike. (g)

ebrown2 on December 30, 2009 at 1:11 PM

yeah, and Jefferson didn’t go to Congress and ask permission for the war. he understood the actual meaning of the Constitution’s Article II powers and that the “Declare War” clause was only in case we wanted to takeover another nation with no Just cause.

Its really amazing what Jefferson and the Founders actually beleived and did vs. what the Paulnuts preach about it.

jp on December 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Prolonged exposure to most liberal statements in the media and some choice words of appeasement from the likes of Ron Paul emboldened our enemies in both Iraq and Afghanistan causing untold casualties, death and destruction. Iraq was finally subdued despite Ron Paul and here’s to hoping he’ll shut the f*ck up until we can resolve Afghanistan.

Don’t worry though, you don’t have to go.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Actually those casaulties were caused by being there. We went into Iraq after occupying their airspace and bombing them for over a decade, which came about from the First Gulf War, which came about through mixed diplomatic signals put forth by the HW State Department, which really was just a way to destroy the same military we built up to fight the Iranians after their revolution and hostage taking, which had absolutely nothing to do with us installing the Shah, a dictator, in the first place.

And Iraq also took away from Afghanistan, which we were told he had adequate troop numbers the whole time, until they said they needed and urgent surge, to fight the freedom fighters driving off a foreign invader (delete 1980s rhetoric) terrorist mujahadeen, that we supported along with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to fight the Soviets, to give them their Vietnam.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Ron Paul is the same as Barack Obama when it comes to national security and foreign policy.

Ugh.

atheling on December 30, 2009 at 1:24 PM

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Prove it.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Obama and Bush are fairly similar on foreign policy.

We need REAL change. That’s why Paul needs to run again in 2012.

Spathi on December 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Prove it.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 1:27 PM

1st question: Prove what? What do you dispute?

Initial answer: Learn history.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM

Obama and Bush are fairly similar on foreign policy.

We need REAL change. That’s why Paul needs to run again in 2012.

Spathi on December 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM

ummmmm yeah, they are just the same, can’t tell them apart, except one is from Texas…now go back to sleep….

right2bright on December 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Get to the core of the problem: muslims. Who started all of this mess? Remember the ’72 Olympics, anyone? The bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut? Multiple airplane hijackings. The Achille Lauro? What does it take? If these ass****s would mind their own business we wouldn’t have pull their s*** out of the fire all of the time. It’s always about the muslims going back 1400 years!! Do your homework!

LarryG on December 30, 2009 at 1:32 PM

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Okay, so now I am getting it….we are the evil ones, that have created terrorism around the world…despite….oh, nevermind, you won’t understand, or care to learn actual history.
Stick with Ron Paul, he suits you, you are the type of person he needs…and he is the type of politician you need.

right2bright on December 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM

LarryG on December 30, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Your facts are “inconvenient”….Paulnuts do not need actual history lessons, they make up their own.

right2bright on December 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM

To quote someone talking about a related topic, it’s kinda like this:

Spike: I just can’t take all this mamby-pamby boo-hooing about the bloody Indians.
Willow: Uh, the preferred term is…
Spike: You won. All right? You came in and you killed them and you took their land. That’s what conquering nations do. It’s what Caesar did, and he’s not goin’ around saying, “I came, I conquered, I felt really bad about it.” The history of the world is not people making friends. You had better weapons, and you massacred them. End of story.
Buffy: Well, I think the Spaniards actually did a lot of – Not that I don’t like Spaniards.
Spike: Listen to you. How you gonna fight anyone with that attitude?
Willow: We don’t wanna fight anyone.
Buffy: I just wanna have Thanksgiving.
Spike: Heh heh. Yeah… Good luck.
Willow: Well, if we could talk to him…
Spike: You exterminated his race. What could you possibly say that would make him feel better? It’s kill or be killed here. Take your bloody pick.
Xander: Maybe it’s the syphilis talking, but, some of that made sense.
TheUnrepentantGeek on December 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Out of all the episodes of my favorite action series, why did you have to quote from the absolute worst one? They should have changed the episode title of that one to “Liberal Clap Trap”.

DethMetalCookieMonst on December 30, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Initial answer: Learn history.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM

Initial response, I’ve lived it.

Yours is a rhetorical argument. I’ve seen it happen live. You repeat Donk and Paulite talking points. I’ve seen the media ignore the success of national elections and a referendum on a constitution and all the great things we’ve done in Iraq and then blow Abu Grahib of proportion and lie about Haiditha. All to cripple The Bush Administration. Paul was too stupid or senile to even check the timing on this idiotic statement about why he did it.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 1:39 PM

Okay, so now I am getting it….we are the evil ones, that have created terrorism around the world…despite….oh, nevermind, you won’t understand, or care to learn actual history.
Stick with Ron Paul, he suits you, you are the type of person he needs…and he is the type of politician you need.

right2bright on December 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Good and Evil real silly concepts if you are talking about geopolitics, that’s usually the McRhetoric reserved for mass consumption of the herd. Now there are good and bad decisions and all decisions have consequences. The fact that we are fighting or have fought, during this past decade, the same people we built up in previous decades should tell us something.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM

The “Glaser transcript” shows Saddam lied to the State Department and chose a negotiated settlement with Kuwait with Egyptian mediators, AFTER WHICH Glaser told him we desired only good relations with Iraq.

Iraq in 1991 obtained a cease fire with terms. Those terms were violated.

Please name the Afghan general active in 1987 who was with the Taliban in 2001. Please explain why this native uprising of freedom fighters linked up with a Saudi named bin Laden to hit their sponsor.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Actually those casaulties were caused by being there. We went into Iraq after occupying their airspace and bombing them for over a decade, which came about from the First Gulf War, which came about through mixed diplomatic signals put forth by the HW State Department, which really was just a way to destroy the same military we built up to fight the Iranians after their revolution and hostage taking, which had absolutely nothing to do with us installing the Shah, a dictator, in the first place.

Wow. Really. We “occupied” the airspace of Baathists? I thought that the U.N. backed cease fire Saddam signed had established parameters for his operations that he constantly ignored for years, ending only when he gave America the middle finger when we asked him to divulge his weapons programs. In other words he was treated with kid gloves for ten years until 3000 dead Americans made it impossible to ignore potential threats any longer.

Also Kuwait and the U.N. begged us to drive Saddam out after he invaded the country. I suppose you think Saddam’s bid to take control of the middle east one country at a time would have never concerned an oil dependent country like us.

The “dictator” Shah of Iran continues to be beloved by the people, installed a Republican style government where religious minorities had civil rights and women were equals, even achieving high ranks in the military. The Iranian revolution was funded and instigated by Communists (thus why they still refer to themselves as Revolutionary) who blended Marxist class warfare with Islam’s innate imperialism. But of course that’s “not our business” because Communists and Islamists have never attacked America.

It’s odd how Paulnuts can lean so far to the right that they end up allied with the hard left. But do tell. Now that all these “evil American acts” have happened and Muslims want revenge for them what exactly is the Ron Paul plan to deal with it? Let them punch themselves out until enough Americans are dead to sate the unending bloodlust of a culture still trapped in the middle ages?

Rob Taylor on December 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM

jp on December 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM

jp…we have the same situation here in KY. Sounds like our candidates are of the same mold. http://www.kentuckybill.com We have a game plan that is working well. It’s a lot of work but the message is starting to resonate. Give a shout if you want to know more.

Crimefyter on December 30, 2009 at 1:46 PM

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM

I have seen men that were pure evil.

hawkdriver on December 30, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Any person who uses anti-semitic code language like “Occupier” is a clown.

Ron Paul and the people who support him are not just fools but dangerous. They honestly believe that Israel and America deserve to be attacked simply for the crime of existing.

tetriskid on December 30, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Ron Paul is nuts. Quotes like “One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist” are a cop out. It’s a way to self-justify without having to actually examine the facts. When you have to murder innocent people and force your cause upon your own (resisting) people, there probably is something wrong with your logic.

hachiban on December 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Good and Evil real silly concepts if you are talking about geopolitics, that’s usually the McRhetoric reserved for mass consumption of the herd. Now there are good and bad decisions and all decisions have consequences. The fact that we are fighting or have fought, during this past decade, the same people we built up in previous decades should tell us something.

LevStrauss on December 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM

So, you’ve chosen Evil.

Chris_Balsz on December 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Out of all the episodes of my favorite action series, why did you have to quote from the absolute worst one? They should have changed the episode title of that one to “Liberal Clap Trap”.

DethMetalCookieMonst on December 30, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Dude. You need to watch that episode again. It skewers so many pansy multi-culti sensibilities that it’s scary. When both Spike and Giles agree on a thing, it means something.

And come on, “You made a bear! Undo it! Undo it!” is a classic line.

TheUnrepentantGeek on December 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM

OK, time for a Constitutional Amendment requiring a minimum acceptable score on the mini-Mental Status Exam and a maximum age for Congress (of 70 or so…after all, they claim that airline pilots have to quit at 60).

HBowmanMD on December 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Rae on December 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM

You’re right. Bush did not see any value in nation building. However, 9/11 changed his mind on that and a lot of other things. When a great event changes a man’s mind, we can understand it. Contrast this with Obama. He planned to use our great economy to fund health care “reform,” Cap and Trade, and anything else he could think of. However, when the economy collapsed, he did not change his mind. He is going forward with those programs and adding two stimuli to boot.

Kafir on December 30, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7