What to do with the 95 Yemenis at Gitmo now?
posted at 8:55 am on December 27, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
In the last two months, al-Qaeda has either masterminded or supported two terrorist attacks on the US from its base in Yemen. The influence shows that the terrorist network has recalibrated itself to compensate for the pressure on its leadership in the Afghanistan/Pakistan theater, and that the Yemeni territory that gave rise to AQ in the first place has become once again the center of a major global threat. That makes the Obama administration’s plans to return 95 hardened terrorists from Gitmo right into Jihadi Central just a little bit … awkward:
“I’d expect Yemen’s handling of returned Guantanamo detainees to come under intense U.S. scrutiny,” said Matthew Waxman, a Columbia law professor who was an assistant Defense secretary for detainee affairs under President George W. Bush. “In the past, the Yemeni government has not shown great capacity or reliability, but the U.S. hopes to build a stronger partnership and improve that record, in part because it has few other options in this important region.”
The White House had no comment on how Abdulmutallab’s history might impact future prisoner releases or official dealings with Yemen. However, U.S. officials have worked intensely in recent months to support the government of Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh and to obtain assurances that Yemenis returned home would not take part in violence. …
In September, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, visited Yemen to press for greater action against Al Qaeda and discuss logistical issues surrounding prisoner releases. And earlier this month, Obama telephoned Saleh to praise him for recent raids against Al Qaeda and for the nation’s overall cooperation with the U.S. in counterterrorism efforts, U.S. and Yemeni officials said.
While the White House maintains that it is pressing Yemen on both the Al Qaeda and prisoner issues, Hoekstra said the issue of emptying out Guantanamo seems to have priority. “The president appears single-mindely focused on closing Guantanamo. He spends more time and energy on closing Guantanamo than on any of the other issues,” said the Michigan Republican.
It does seem that Yemen has become more cooperative on fighting al-Qaeda. That doesn’t mean that the best way to reward them is to dump almost a hundred terrorists in their back yard to attempt to woo back to rationality. Whether they want them back or not, sending the Gitmo detainees back now while the network in Yemen is growing is nothing short of idiotic.
One of the people we killed in those raids, Saeed al-Shehri, was a former Gitmo detainee returned by the Bush administration who became a leader in the Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) branch in Yemen. Do we want 95 more Shehris in Yemen now?
The priority for this administration should not be “emptying out” Gitmo. It should be securing the US and defeating our enemy. Our enemy now operates with near-impunity from Yemen and has already conducted two attacks on the US, one of which resulted in 14 deaths and the other could have killed hundreds in the air and others on the ground. Allowing 95 of their allies to run back to Yemen now would demonstrate the victory of political expediency over national security. It’s time to close the revolving door on Gitmo and keep the terrorists where we can make sure they don’t attack Americans again.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Chief characteristic of this administration.
Maquis on December 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM
I am not expecting this administration to connect the dots.
Rndguy on December 27, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Keeping these men locked up for years is stupid. After they’ve been interrogated ad infinitum, chain them together and load them all on an airplane bound for the Middle East. Halfway across the ocean, open the door, and invite them all to step out and meet Allah a little earlier than they had intended. No one will ever know they never arrived. POOF. Problem solved.
bradley11 on December 27, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Oh yeah, they promise not to be involved in violence and we buy them a ticket home. Would you believe someone who thinks it’s ok to lie to non-muslims and loves to blow themselves up or start a fire in their crotch just to get to paradise with 72 virgins? Puleezeeee!
Kissmygrits on December 27, 2009 at 9:07 AM
I think that I would choose a different word than idiotic as I consider this administration to be highly intelligent (they managed to fool 52% in the face of overwhelming evidence of their intentions). The problem is that they are using their considerable intellect to nefarious ends. To ascribe their actions to stupidity sells them short.
Malicious would be my word of choice.
turfmann on December 27, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Charge them as spies and saboteurs under the GC.
Execute the sentence.
Problem solved.
Either that or al Qaeda swim trunks handed to them as we point them eastward from the shores of Guantanamo at gunpoint.
ajacksonian on December 27, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Hang them.
Jaibones on December 27, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Awkward unless you’re the One who can “part the seas, heal the rifts, lift a nation, close the Gitmos and depart from the bitter partisanship that has plagued Washington for the last 8 years….er…wrong speech, could uhhhhh someone fix this teleprompter….?”
ted c on December 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM
*hits Staples Easy Button*
ted c on December 27, 2009 at 9:10 AM
only if they’re implanted with the new drone tracking device that serves as a homing beacon for Hellfire missiles.
ted c on December 27, 2009 at 9:11 AM
I’m sure all the terrorists will be willing to pinky swear to be good boys from now on. Just like the Yemeni government will pinky swear to keep a close eye on all of them.
We all know exactly what those “assurances” are worth. Their promises are every bit as reliable as Barry Obama’s promises are.
AZCoyote on December 27, 2009 at 9:12 AM
Rope + scaffold. Some assembly required.
Vashta.Nerada on December 27, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Hey, let’s not do it half way. When we send ‘em back to Yemen, let’s give each one a jumbo jet and some bombs to blow it up with.
petefrt on December 27, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Obviously Obama wants to send them back to their recruiter.
tarpon on December 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Well if we don’t send them to Yemen then they should go to IL because we HAVE to close GITMO, it’s a terrorist recruiting tool. Anyone who opposes closing GITMO is actually voting to help the terrorists!
/liberal logic
Mord on December 27, 2009 at 9:19 AM
Huh?
The only way to assure the Yemenis won’t take part in violence is to keep them locked up!!!!
Obummer.Acting.Stupidly.
ladyingray on December 27, 2009 at 9:19 AM
Hate to break it to you…uhbuhma is not interested…we need a liitle humiliation…in his opinion…
winston on December 27, 2009 at 9:20 AM
Implant a GPS tracker in them.
- The Cat
MirCat on December 27, 2009 at 9:20 AM
I’d laugh if this wasn’t so SERIOUS an issue…
Khun Joe on December 27, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Why is Obama so determined to close Gitmo? Is it so he can return the territory to Cuba?
OldEnglish on December 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM
The historical precedent is that prisoners of war are detained until the end of the war.
The war on terror is not over.
The detainees need to remain at Gitmo until the war is over.
slp on December 27, 2009 at 9:32 AM
slp the precedent for saboteurs is execution without trial. The same for those that hide amongst civilians in plain clothes.
- The Cat
MirCat on December 27, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Invite them to dinner at the White House for a friendly discussion, a few deep bows and some beer?
Key West Reader on December 27, 2009 at 9:39 AM
Break their detonators?
LibTired on December 27, 2009 at 9:45 AM
“The priority for this administration should not be “emptying out” Gitmo. It should be securing the US and defeating our enemy.”
Why yes, yes it should Capt’n!
But a Rhetorical Question please? (with no implication that you agree with the Administration, at all)
When was the last time, that this Administration did anything, that implied that it was not Anti-American, Pro-Jihadi; or that it cared about America and its security and well being, at all?
Just asking…
Dale in Atlanta on December 27, 2009 at 9:45 AM
why this is “UNPRECEDENTED”
RealMc on December 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Obama wont close Gitmo now. A trump card has been played.
No matter what he does with this current situation, if he continues to close Gitmo the American public will see him as being weak on terrorism.
Also don’t forget the 9 or so former detainees who were returned to Yemen last week. I am sure one of them will show up again!
Rndguy on December 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM
I say “Return all 95 to Yemen immediately!!”
…in caskets.
GoldenEagle4444 on December 27, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Sure it is! We now have Overseas Contigency Operations. No GWOT, isn’t that neat?
bikermailman on December 27, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Oh the administration has connected the dots alright…but they don’t care because they WANT this country destroyed and they don’t care if the destruction comes from within or without. All they care about is destroying America!
Vntnrse on December 27, 2009 at 9:59 AM
Once again, harsh reality intrudes on the Obowma ‘plan’. Lets face it, the whole gitmo closing was a purely political sop to the hard leftists. It never made any sense otherwise. Public opinion will now be approaching landslide numbers against it, so time for a pivot.
2ipa on December 27, 2009 at 10:04 AM
To some degree this liberal meme is true. But it is ture only because the American left MADE it a terrorist recruiting tool. However, now it have morphed into an icon for American managability for the terrorists. Ifthey can use American politics to get their fighters back from Gitmo, they will do the same from Illinois.
MikeA on December 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM
I bet the Rosenberg’s are shaking their heads in wonder at the state of our “government intelligence” today…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg
lovingmyUSA on December 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM
He wants to give Gitmo back to Castro as a gift…It makes perfect sense to Obama-mao…
Nozzle on December 27, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Osama bin Bama
petefrt on December 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Hey, I gotta go with the President on this one. Give ‘em a show trial, find them guilty, and get rid of ‘em.
After all, ain’t that what we be doin’ in NYC?
BigAlSouth on December 27, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Oh goody. A stupid act ( returning detainees to Yemen) is now going to come under intense scrutiny. It was STUPID to begin with, what’s to examine? The degree of stupidity.
How do you expect the spawning ground of Al Qaeda to handle returning terrorists. “Welcome home, brother”.
donh525 on December 27, 2009 at 10:20 AM
@ BigAlSouth
Wazzzzzzzz Uppppppp!?!?
RealMc on December 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Send them to vox. His Mom’s got some extra rooms.
kingsjester on December 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
BREAKING MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEWS….
“Some are suggesting those victims of imprisonment and torture in Guantanamo should be given a fresh start and offered U.S. Citizenship as an offering of reconciliation and a show of goodwill to the Arab world.”
“Leading this Campaign of reconciliation calling for the release of Detainees into local charity based transition settings is Senator Dick Durbin and several other members of Congress. They have sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder requesting he consider the proposal. Justice Department officials say the AG might be favorably disposed to the proposal.”
Coming to a neighborhood near you?
PappyD61 on December 27, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Wish I could say I was shocked.
Move them to holder and nopolitano’s hood.
They can invite bill ayers over and sing kumbaya
RealMc on December 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Al Qaeda needs reinforcements and Obama is right there on the spot. “Anything else I can do for’ya guys, just jingle my Blackberry and let me know! Ok?”
Nice, really nice!
Lew on December 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Ed it’s not awkward.
They will be released as surely as we declared war on Iraq and Afghanistan in 2003.
They will live to fight another day.
If Obama doesn’t make himself forever Prez, then we have another opportunity to fight these same people on another day with a Republican President.
I just hope I’m not killed on US soil in some terror attack , i live in DC, due to O-scumbag in White House.
father on December 27, 2009 at 10:41 AM
According to the laws of war, they are illegal combatants and thus subject to summary execution.
Put them against a wall, shoot them, feed the remains to the sharks. Done.
This would serve two purposes – the immediate problem of what to do with them, and also serve notice that we do in fact expect muslems to adhere to the same civilized behavior we do.
Rebar on December 27, 2009 at 10:42 AM
RealMc on December 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Could it be??????
BigAlSouth on December 27, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Drop them on the battlefield, next to a pile of rusty AK’s and tell them “Grab iron”
gooddad on December 27, 2009 at 11:03 AM
There is a third purpose – all the liberal heads that would explode from the thought of such a logical solution. In the end, that would be worth it.
JohnnyD on December 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Yeah, that would be great, if:
1) we were sure they’d be found guilty,
2) the tax payers weren’t paying for the show trial,and
3) “getting rid of them” meant lining them up against a wall and smokin’em.
Dopenstrange on December 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Gee…I hadn’t thought of the fringe benefits. Great idea!
Dopenstrange on December 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Just a tangential rant regarding the picture with this post. If the prisoners shown are engaged in their daily prayers, about half of them are facing the wrong way, are they not?
VoyskaPVO on December 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM
turfmann
I think of it as the low cunning of manipulation, not intelligence, per se. These people know how to do one thing well, lie their a$$es off. On every other aspect of life, we are looking at grasping, functional idiots.
Economics? Fail.
National Defense? Fail.
Energy? Fail.
International Affairs? Fail.
Understanding freedom and our Constitution? Fail.
Honesty, Transparency, and Integrity? Fail, Fail, Fail!
MJBrutus on December 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM
If you want to trust Muslims, you deserve whatever happens to you.
BL@KBIRD on December 27, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Obama needs to give them a little speech just to change their attitude toward the United States, then let them go.
GaltBlvnAtty on December 27, 2009 at 11:32 AM
How about putting them up against a wall and shooting them?
Works for me. Hell, I’ll donate the ammunition.
GarandFan on December 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Sloan Morganstern on December 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM
oops
Sloan Morganstern on December 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM
I believe you wanted to say “historically idiotic.” These guys should have been tried years ago, executed years ago, and in hell years ago. They are what we used to call spies as they are enemy soldiers in civilian uniform. In warfare it’s perfectly okay (ask FDR) to have them tried by military tribunal and summarily executed. We’ve become detached with reality here for some odd reason.
Mojave Mark on December 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM
In one short year of this administration I’ve come to expect nothing less.
4shoes on December 27, 2009 at 12:12 PM
It’s unfortunate that is such a true statement.
4shoes on December 27, 2009 at 12:14 PM
***
Somehow the traditional Texas “long drop with a short rope” seems appropriate. Nathan Hale, Major John Andre, John Brown style. Clean, quick, Saddam Hussein style tested.
***
Or handcuff them to the seats in an obsolete remote controlled on autopilot airliner. Send it towards Yemen–with an on board Lockerbie style bomb in the hold. Tell them to make their final peace and to get ready to meet and greet their 72 virgins. And that they have from 30 minutes to 6 hours to think about how passengers on doomed airline flights thought about coming events in their short remaining lives.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on December 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM
God I hate the stupidity of the Obama administration and the liberal stupidity that encourages it. Gitmo is an excellent facility at which to to try & imprison terrorists permanently – it should never be closed! It is so practical a location and it is so stupid not to use it, especially when the alternatives are so dangerous. It’s a no brainer!
Reminds me of an ancient Greek adage:
“Against a man’s stupidity even the gods are helpless”.
Chessplayer on December 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Why, send them back to Yemen of course.
uknowmorethanme on December 27, 2009 at 12:57 PM
I can answer your question with two words, FIRING SQUAD!
free on December 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Grind em up and use em for fertilizer, Waste not; want not.
jgdp on December 27, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Sniper practice! I’m down with that.
faol on December 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM
I have a Yugoslav M48 that I just took out of the cosmoline and I have several boxes of Hornady 8mm Mauser ammo. I will save the US millions of dollars if they will let me go to Gitmo and get a little range time in.
saltyrover on December 27, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Reminds me of this.
- The Cat
MirCat on December 27, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Give 95 survivors of 9/11 a chance to man a mounted SAW for a few seconds. Problem solved.
Dark-Star on December 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM
What to do with them? At the rate we’re going, they’ll be granted citizenship and given jobs as airport screeners.
roninacreage on December 27, 2009 at 10:57 PM
Just in case I didn’t make my opinion strong enough…..
The Obama Administration WANTS to destroy America!!!
Vntnrse on December 27, 2009 at 11:23 PM
Now I honestly hope Rahm “Dead Fish” reads that!
Vntnrse on December 27, 2009 at 11:25 PM
I still maintain Obama isn’t very smart. He got into Harvard via affirmative action, (his grades did NOT merit Ivy league) and he skyrocketed to power via people with shady connections who knew well the liberal obsession for anything “diverse”.
His handlers do appear to be quite intelligent/malicious and I agree about the part of Obama not hiding his ill intentions and still getting elected.
scotash on December 28, 2009 at 1:50 AM
I understand that the Americans hold that killing isn’t murder when it’s done in self-defense. Well, then.
Kralizec on December 28, 2009 at 2:08 AM
Duh!
Kill them. Desecrate their bodies. Feed them to the fish. Film it and broadcast it to al Jazeera TV. Explain that America is tired of putting up with the tactics of Islam (lying, beheading, beating of women, killing of innocents for sport, and applauding it while denying they ever agreed with it in the first place, lulling their victims into a false sense of security while waiting to stab them in the backs by surprise) and they all (every one of them in the world) have 30 minutes to prepare to meet Allah. Then nuke them and send them to their final destinations.
Hell….. where they belong.
And start drilling for oil horizontally in the glass from offshore.
Problems all solved.
Subsunk
PS,
You think I’m kidding, right? We were planning to do the same to the Soviet Union 20 years ago. What’s different now?
Subsunk on December 28, 2009 at 8:27 AM
CTF 151 is in the water there, and the USS Boxer has it’s full combat compliment on-board and on-station.
Someone might want to tell the WH. Just sayin’…
MarkT on December 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM