<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOREBODINGS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER &#171; RevolutionRadio.org</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3127809</link>
		<dc:creator>FOREBODINGS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER &#171; RevolutionRadio.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3127809</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, that morning I had read this article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, that morning I had read this article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Single Stroke Of A Pen : 101 Dead Armadillos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3122693</link>
		<dc:creator>A Single Stroke Of A Pen : 101 Dead Armadillos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3122693</guid>
		<description>[...] goodness nothing like that can happen in the United States of America. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goodness nothing like that can happen in the United States of America. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our President: Bringing America to its Knees, Before the World</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3107768</link>
		<dc:creator>Our President: Bringing America to its Knees, Before the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3107768</guid>
		<description>[...] Also blogging: A Soldier&#8217;s Perspective Brutally Honest Wizbang Blog Pink Flamingo Bar The Anchoress NewsBusters Friends of Mark Furhman Dr. Melissa Clouthier Ed Morrissey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also blogging: A Soldier&#8217;s Perspective Brutally Honest Wizbang Blog Pink Flamingo Bar The Anchoress NewsBusters Friends of Mark Furhman Dr. Melissa Clouthier Ed Morrissey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. placed under international police-state &#171; The Issachar Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3102051</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. placed under international police-state &#171; The Issachar Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3102051</guid>
		<description>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama executive order provides Interpol diplomatic immunity (Update) &#124; Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3089567</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama executive order provides Interpol diplomatic immunity (Update) &#124; Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3089567</guid>
		<description>[...] a good write-up on National Review Online&#8217;s the Corner. Michelle Malkin, Pamela Gellar, and Ed Morrissey have also been writing on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a good write-up on National Review Online&#8217;s the Corner. Michelle Malkin, Pamela Gellar, and Ed Morrissey have also been writing on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All American Blogger &#187; Obama Grants Interpol Diplomatic Immunity &#8211; A Rightosphere Roundup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3087752</link>
		<dc:creator>All American Blogger &#187; Obama Grants Interpol Diplomatic Immunity &#8211; A Rightosphere Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3087752</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey at Hot Air suggests Schippert overreaches with his last argument and asks an important [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey at Hot Air suggests Schippert overreaches with his last argument and asks an important [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBAMA GIVES INTERPOL FREE REIGN ON U.S. SOIL OUR LAWS DONT APPLY &#171; fort wayne right Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3087636</link>
		<dc:creator>OBAMA GIVES INTERPOL FREE REIGN ON U.S. SOIL OUR LAWS DONT APPLY &#171; fort wayne right Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3087636</guid>
		<description>[...] http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-ameri... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-ameri.." rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-ameri..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Places The United States Under An &#8220;International Police State&#8221; &#171; The Tonka Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3086989</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Places The United States Under An &#8220;International Police State&#8221; &#171; The Tonka Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3086989</guid>
		<description>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. placed under international police-state &#171; Wide Spectrum Analysis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3086016</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. placed under international police-state &#171; Wide Spectrum Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3086016</guid>
		<description>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit of background is in order here, and Hot Air provides it: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sovereignty is such a quaint idea&#8230; &#171; Curtis Lowe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3084717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sovereignty is such a quaint idea&#8230; &#171; Curtis Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3084717</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey at Hot Air has this to say about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey at Hot Air has this to say about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The National Republicrat - Obama Exempts Interpol From Immunity and Discovery</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3082180</link>
		<dc:creator>The National Republicrat - Obama Exempts Interpol From Immunity and Discovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3082180</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest at HotAir.     Written By SactoDan &#124; Email this author &#124; All posts by SactoDan   Find this post interesting? Subscribe to our RSS Feed and stay up to date!   ©2008-2009 National Republicrat. All Rights Reserved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest at HotAir.     Written By SactoDan | Email this author | All posts by SactoDan   Find this post interesting? Subscribe to our RSS Feed and stay up to date!   ©2008-2009 National Republicrat. All Rights Reserved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dogs House</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3081989</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dogs House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3081989</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama Gives Away Just A Little More...&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess the following will give Glenn Beck something to discuss for the next week. It seems that Obama has signed an Executive Order that grants Interpol immunity from searches and FOIA requests. Looks like that police force that Obama wants to put out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama Gives Away Just A Little More&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I guess the following will give Glenn Beck something to discuss for the next week. It seems that Obama has signed an Executive Order that grants Interpol immunity from searches and FOIA requests. Looks like that police force that Obama wants to put out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INTERPOL Now Has Full Law-Enforcement Authority in the U.S. Without Accountability &#124; Political Lipskip</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3081882</link>
		<dc:creator>INTERPOL Now Has Full Law-Enforcement Authority in the U.S. Without Accountability &#124; Political Lipskip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3081882</guid>
		<description>[...] HotAir explains: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the status of diplomatic personnel in order to engage more constructively on international law enforcement. In Executive Order 12425, Reagan made two exceptions to that status. The first had to do with taxation, but the second was to make sure that Interpol had the same accountability for its actions as American law enforcement — namely, they had to produce records when demanded by courts and could not have immunity for their actions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HotAir explains: During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the status of diplomatic personnel in order to engage more constructively on international law enforcement. In Executive Order 12425, Reagan made two exceptions to that status. The first had to do with taxation, but the second was to make sure that Interpol had the same accountability for its actions as American law enforcement — namely, they had to produce records when demanded by courts and could not have immunity for their actions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Of Executive Orders and Trojan Horses &#8211; Update NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3081520</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Of Executive Orders and Trojan Horses &#8211; Update NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3081520</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrisey &#8211; Hot Air &#8211; Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrisey &#8211; Hot Air &#8211; Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CREDIT NEW MEDIA BLOGGERS FOR SOUNDING ALARM ON OBAMA EO RE: INTERPOL &#171; The Radio Patriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3081314</link>
		<dc:creator>CREDIT NEW MEDIA BLOGGERS FOR SOUNDING ALARM ON OBAMA EO RE: INTERPOL &#171; The Radio Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3081314</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrisey – Hot Air – Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrisey – Hot Air – Did Obama exempt Interpol from same legal constraints as American law-enforcement? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Snooper Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3079450</link>
		<dc:creator>The Snooper Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3079450</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Interpol Taking Over American Law...&lt;/strong&gt;

Just this morning I posted an article from Threats Watch and the reposting was from an article entitled ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Interpol Taking Over American Law&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Just this morning I posted an article from Threats Watch and the reposting was from an article entitled &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamunism: Threat&#8230; or Menace? &#124; America Watches Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3079089</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamunism: Threat&#8230; or Menace? &#124; America Watches Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3079089</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air rejects the most sweeping claims of Schippert and Middleton but does find Obama&#8217;s EO granting Interpol immunity suspicious. Responding to a claim from the Threatswatch article: Property and assets being immune [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air rejects the most sweeping claims of Schippert and Middleton but does find Obama&#8217;s EO granting Interpol immunity suspicious. Responding to a claim from the Threatswatch article: Property and assets being immune [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdigaudio</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3079070</link>
		<dc:creator>pdigaudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3079070</guid>
		<description>This is Our Lord and Savior&#039;s SS, His Gestapo. The basis for the civilian national security force He wants to create. Combine them with ACORN and SEIU and we&#039;ve got a major threat to our freedoms, not to mention the 2010 and 2012 elections.

A declaration of martial law, anyone?

Everything is now in the ballpark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Our Lord and Savior&#8217;s SS, His Gestapo. The basis for the civilian national security force He wants to create. Combine them with ACORN and SEIU and we&#8217;ve got a major threat to our freedoms, not to mention the 2010 and 2012 elections.</p>
<p>A declaration of martial law, anyone?</p>
<p>Everything is now in the ballpark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold Fury &#187; Police Navidad: Santa Hussein Claus at the North INTERPOL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3078994</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold Fury &#187; Police Navidad: Santa Hussein Claus at the North INTERPOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3078994</guid>
		<description>[...] I voted for Gov. Palin, I&#8217;d get a Police State administration with an Above-the-Law attitude&#8230;and they were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I voted for Gov. Palin, I&#8217;d get a Police State administration with an Above-the-Law attitude&#8230;and they were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadsword</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3078408</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3078408</guid>
		<description>Oops, dropped a thought&quot;...jobs or face the &quot;join with Sarumann&quot; choice.  

During the RNC convention, the rioting lefties believed they were fighting a police state. (Someone should ask them whey they were not simply machine gunned on John Ireland Blvd, or why those arrested were ever heard from again. I know, for them, trick question.  Heh.)  The muscle is just the muscle.  What must be opposed is the malevolent eye behind the muscles.    As another blogger has said, &quot;No more free Wacos&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, dropped a thought&#8221;&#8230;jobs or face the &#8220;join with Sarumann&#8221; choice.  </p>
<p>During the RNC convention, the rioting lefties believed they were fighting a police state. (Someone should ask them whey they were not simply machine gunned on John Ireland Blvd, or why those arrested were ever heard from again. I know, for them, trick question.  Heh.)  The muscle is just the muscle.  What must be opposed is the malevolent eye behind the muscles.    As another blogger has said, &#8220;No more free Wacos&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadsword</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3078352</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3078352</guid>
		<description>Mad Mad Monica on 12/23, 0630 said:  &quot;You guys realize what the aim of this is, right? How better to insure evil Bush and Cheney face trial for war crimes than to allow a foreign police agency the right to arrest and detain people without due process? &quot;  Whether this is the case or not may be beside the point.  A European bureaucracy with certain police powers, of what exact nature this writer is not familiar, is nevertheless granted certain and very specific immunities which, if granted to the police of Lincoln&#039;s Peoria, would be easily recognized and both unconstitutional and tyrannic.  We must assume the exact purpose of this amending of those limits put in place by the Dunce President, have been seen through and wisely eliminated by that constitutional scholar, the Boy President.

I have wondered how he was going to try and circumvent American law, this seems like a nice trial balloon.

thomasaur on 12/23, 4:03 said:  &quot; I have wondered how he was going to try and circumvent American law, this seems like a nice trial balloon. &quot; With this I concur 100%.  These people, in the first circle, are not  lovers of liberty, but Transnational Progressives.  (See John Fonte, Transnational Progressives.)   Unbelieveably, (but maybe not so for this Land of 10000 Therapies), there is at the U. of MN a law professor, (whose name escapes my memory), who believes people have no right to defend themselves, and that such rights belong only to (Great Escape reference here) &quot;...the higher authorities&quot;.  &quot;And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like ifevery Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had beenuncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if,during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested aquarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling withterror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but hadunderstood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall anambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, polkers, or whatever else was athand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for nogood purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you&#039;d be cracking the skull of acutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonelychauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs would veryquickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all ofStalin&#039;s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! &quot;
The time may come when we dare not wait for this last chance in the doorways, when to stop reacting and simply act.  Fortunately we are armed, but to believe the enemy is the police is to mistake the police for the state.  (In Sozlzhenitsyn&#039;s quote above however, they had become equivalent.)  It seems to me the trick will be preventing the police and military from becoming trapped into joining the state against the People.  This is part of what seems possible by the Boy president&#039;s exec. order; police must choose their jobs or a &quot;We must join with Sarumann&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mad Mad Monica on 12/23, 0630 said:  &#8220;You guys realize what the aim of this is, right? How better to insure evil Bush and Cheney face trial for war crimes than to allow a foreign police agency the right to arrest and detain people without due process? &#8221;  Whether this is the case or not may be beside the point.  A European bureaucracy with certain police powers, of what exact nature this writer is not familiar, is nevertheless granted certain and very specific immunities which, if granted to the police of Lincoln&#8217;s Peoria, would be easily recognized and both unconstitutional and tyrannic.  We must assume the exact purpose of this amending of those limits put in place by the Dunce President, have been seen through and wisely eliminated by that constitutional scholar, the Boy President.</p>
<p>I have wondered how he was going to try and circumvent American law, this seems like a nice trial balloon.</p>
<p>thomasaur on 12/23, 4:03 said:  &#8221; I have wondered how he was going to try and circumvent American law, this seems like a nice trial balloon. &#8221; With this I concur 100%.  These people, in the first circle, are not  lovers of liberty, but Transnational Progressives.  (See John Fonte, Transnational Progressives.)   Unbelieveably, (but maybe not so for this Land of 10000 Therapies), there is at the U. of MN a law professor, (whose name escapes my memory), who believes people have no right to defend themselves, and that such rights belong only to (Great Escape reference here) &#8220;&#8230;the higher authorities&#8221;.  &#8220;And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like ifevery Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had beenuncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if,during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested aquarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling withterror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but hadunderstood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall anambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, polkers, or whatever else was athand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for nogood purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you&#8217;d be cracking the skull of acutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonelychauffeur &#8212; what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs would veryquickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all ofStalin&#8217;s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! &#8221;<br />
The time may come when we dare not wait for this last chance in the doorways, when to stop reacting and simply act.  Fortunately we are armed, but to believe the enemy is the police is to mistake the police for the state.  (In Sozlzhenitsyn&#8217;s quote above however, they had become equivalent.)  It seems to me the trick will be preventing the police and military from becoming trapped into joining the state against the People.  This is part of what seems possible by the Boy president&#8217;s exec. order; police must choose their jobs or a &#8220;We must join with Sarumann&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here Comes The Gestapo With Complete Immunity - Tennessee Gun Owners</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3078334</link>
		<dc:creator>Here Comes The Gestapo With Complete Immunity - Tennessee Gun Owners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3078334</guid>
		<description>[...] as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945...  http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/2...w-enforcement/   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945&#8230;  <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/2...w-enforcement/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/2&#8230;w-enforcement/</a>   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Lizards</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3078007</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Lizards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3078007</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obamunism:  Threat... or Menace?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Threatswatch -- which is normally fairly reliable -- is either hyperventilating some very interesting psychedelic vapors... or else they&#039;re onto something big. Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton note that President Barack H. Obama signed an Executive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obamunism:  Threat&#8230; or Menace?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Threatswatch &#8212; which is normally fairly reliable &#8212; is either hyperventilating some very interesting psychedelic vapors&#8230; or else they&#8217;re onto something big. Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton note that President Barack H. Obama signed an Executive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heads up &#171; Ramparts 360</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3077893</link>
		<dc:creator>Heads up &#171; Ramparts 360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3077893</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more at HotAir.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at HotAir.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does It Mean? &#8212; The New Clarion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/23/did-obama-exempt-interpol-from-same-legal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/comment-page-2/#comment-3077882</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does It Mean? &#8212; The New Clarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=76427#comment-3077882</guid>
		<description>[...] Captain Ed looks at this EO revision. He makes an interesting point: American citizens have fewer rights before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Captain Ed looks at this EO revision. He makes an interesting point: American citizens have fewer rights before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
