A Christmas story: wave of genital mutilation in the UK?

posted at 1:36 pm on December 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

This isn’t exactly the heartwarming holiday story that is the usual fare of media during Christmas week.  Nor does it come from a source one would expect.  The Independent, a newspaper associated more with the hard Left of British politics, reports that the UK has done next to nothing to stop the practice of female genital mutilation, the act of brutally removing the clitorises of young girls to curb their sexual appetites in later years.

Does the Independent mean to criticize Britain’s foreign policy?  Not exactly.  The danger, unfortunately, is in the UK itself (via The Other McCain):

Hundreds of British schoolgirls are facing the terrifying prospect of female genital mutilation (FGM) over the Christmas holidays as experts warn the practice continues to flourish across the country. Parents typically take their daughters back to their country of origin for FGM during school holidays, but The Independent on Sunday has been told that “cutters” are being flown to the UK to carry out the mutilation at “parties” involving up to 20 girls to save money.

The police face growing criticism for failing to prosecute a single person for carrying out FGM in 25 years; new legislation from 2003 which prohibits taking a girl overseas for FGM has also failed to secure a conviction.

Experts say the lack of convictions, combined with the Government’s failure to invest enough money in education and prevention strategies, mean the practice continues to thrive. Knowledge of the health risks and of the legislation remains patchy among practising communities, while beliefs about the supposed benefits for girls remain firm, according to research by the Foundation for Women’s Health, Research and Development (Forward).

Normally, parents take their children abroad, which has caused the UK to watch when preadolescent children leave school suddenly as a way to monitor for it.  Why are the FGM mutilators being asked to come to the UK?  Economics:

Jackie Mathers, a nurse from the Bristol Safeguarding Children Board, said: “These families do not do this out of spite or hatred; they believe this will give their daughters the best opportunities in life. We would like a conviction, not against the parents, but against a cutter, someone who makes a living from this. We have anecdotal information that the credit crunch means people can’t go home, so they’re getting cutters over for ‘FGM parties’. It is hard for people to speak out because they are from communities that are already vilified as asylum seekers, so to stand up against their communities is to risk being ostracised. But we have to empower girls and women to address this, along with teachers, school nurses and social workers. We can’t ignore it; it is mutilation.”

Unfortunately, this is still a fairly common practice in Africa and some Muslim countries.  It creates a lifetime of pain and medical complications for women, and can kill the girls with infections.  It’s purely subjugative, as FGM has no support in Islam or any other religion.

This calls into question the UK’s attempts to proscribe the practice thus far.  They passed a law banning FGM almost seven years ago, and everyone acknowledges that the practice has continued.  Yet no prosecutions have been made, and parents apparently feel comfortable enough to host FGM “parties” in the UK in order to get bulk discounts during the recession.  That makes the UK’s rule of law seem rather impotent, especially considering the vulnerable nature of the victims and the deep and permanent damage FGM does to them.  Would the UK look the other way for pedophilia parties?

Kudos to the Independent for bucking political correctness and exposing the problem.  They deserve a round of thanks from everyone across the political spectrum.  British citizens should take this opportunity to demand action on the law they demanded, and which appears to have been roundly ignored in the cause of faux diversity.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

So sad. Thank you for sharing this.

bridgetown on December 22, 2009 at 1:40 PM

Ed,

Any information on these “parties” being conducted in the United States, and if so, where is the NOW gang?

(crickets)

Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Whats worse: The act iself or the government that allows to it happen (in this case the UK)?

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Nice Pixies reference, Ed.

Red Cloud on December 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM

When do the “Beheading daughters because they wore jeans” parties begin in Britain?

Bishop on December 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Our favorite Islamist troll Grow Fins will be here soon to tell us that slicing up young girls is not nearly as bad as Geert Wilders comparing the Koran to Mein Kampf.

PimFortuynsGhost on December 22, 2009 at 1:44 PM

DEPORT THEM NOW.

I think Britain is gone. It will be the first Islamic Republic in Europe.

DerKrieger on December 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM

These people who commit this barbarsim on young girls shouldn’t be arrested — they should be shot in the eye.

D2Boston on December 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM

After the “cuttings” party, is there a ‘fisting’ happy hour…?

Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM

That’s f****d up.

BPD on December 22, 2009 at 1:49 PM

I have seen documentaries on this. It’s heart breaking, heart wrenching, and just horrible to watch, and know it goes on. Women are basically nothing, when they are subjected to this heinous ritual.

My heart goes out to these girls, as well as my prayers, and it should be considered a sexual abuse. Prosecuted, and harsh punishments for it having been done.

Now I have to wonder too…are we sure it’s not going on in this country?

capejasmine on December 22, 2009 at 1:50 PM

I keep remembering General Casey’s concern about damaging diversity after the Fort Hood shootings.

a capella on December 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM

FGM has no support in Islam or any other religion.

Merry Christmas, Ed, but that is just bullshit.

DaydreamBeliever on December 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM

Castrate the men to lesson their desire.
See how fast the government responds. I’ll bet with the first castration, they prosecute.

lonestar1 on December 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Knowing the Brits I’m surprised that the procedure isn’t covered or performed by the NHS. Diversity reigns there. Might as well make it safe in all its forms. NuLabor knows no depths when it comes to denigrating their indigenous culture. Does that sound familiar?

BTW, the UK is the model for our current health care bill under consideration.

Cody1991 on December 22, 2009 at 1:56 PM

If something equivalent were being done to house pets in Britain, THEN there’d be hell to pay. There’d be riots.

RBMN on December 22, 2009 at 1:58 PM

Very sad. Just so very sad.

But Ed, kudos on the most excellent PIXIES reference.

Now I have to go crank up that song!

BlueStateBilly on December 22, 2009 at 1:58 PM

I know this happens in Australia as well, I read an article about it a few months ago. Probably it happens wherever there are African Muslims.

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM

I thought it was understood England is pretty much lost already. Like the Phillipines of WW2.

onomo on December 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM

The savages are taking over England and they intend to take over here too.

LODGE4 on December 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM

This makes me friggin sick to my stomach to even think about. Political correctness is yet again to blame for the lack of action, just like it was for the Major. We can’t be prosecuting people for their religious beliefs after all, right? Well if your religious beliefs involve killing and mutilating little girls I think we may have to take a second look. We prosecute faith healers don’t we? I don’t see how this is any different.

Why is a belief system that spawns killings, hatred and opression like liberalisim and Islam always afforded the loudest protections? You think that in a sane world, your records and deeds would speak louder than your intentions.

Mord on December 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Hm, alternate headline…

UK government to genital mutilators: gouge away

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 2:03 PM

Ahh…moderate Islam and the western governments that protect it….

Bugler on December 22, 2009 at 2:04 PM

this is still a fairly common practice in Africa and some Muslim countries.

’nuff said.

Alden Pyle on December 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Where are the feminists? The silence is always deafening with these chicks.

Oh, right. The Hillary storm troopers are busy arguing about abortion with Social Conservatives, as usual.

Cody1991 on December 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM

UK government to genital mutilators: gouge away

Dual Pixies references. Excellent.

radioboyatl on December 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM

I am not surprised. The Brits are afraid to do anything that would offend their Muslim invaders.
They think by appeasing them this way they’re going to earn some concessions for the future.

Badger40 on December 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM

where is the NOW gang?

NOW is a leftist organization first, and a supporter of womens’ rights second, if at all. As such, NOW is unlikely to criticize any practice that is carried out by a non-Western (or better, anti-Western) cultural group.

Cicero43 on December 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM

Diversity baby, DIVERSITY!

Don’t expect any women’s groups to say word one about this.

jukin on December 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM

FGM has no support in Islam or any other religion.

Merry Christmas, Ed, but that is just bullshit.

DaydreamBeliever on December 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM

Yes, I’m afraid Ed is subject to “feel-goodism” too.

johnsteele on December 22, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Ed, what would Ike do? For crying out loud what can we do? Don’t you think we already figured this was going on? What can be done to save probably our most important ally?
And yes this is probably going on here too. What can we do about it?
Our POTUS bows to everything coming and going. Our safe school czar only cares about gay sexing our toddlers. So before time for my next medication, please tell me what can we do about this?

onomo on December 22, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Ayaan Hirsi Ali wrote about when it was done to her in her book “Infidel”. It was a horrifying but all-too-imformative read.

thebrokenrattle on December 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Yet this is not the worst practice they have. There is also Infibulation, which is essentially sewing girls up, leaving a small opening for urine and menstrual fluids.

Brought to by the Religion of Peace and other forward thinkers.

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM

Brought to *you* by

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Merry Christmas, Ed, but that is just bullshit.

DaydreamBeliever

Well he is correct though. I have lived in Africa, and FGM is more of a cultural practice that transcends religion out there. It still goes on in non-Muslim and even Christian countries there too

firepilot on December 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM

as FGM has no support in Islam or any other religion.

I concur with DaydreamBeliever. Bullshit squared. That is no different than telling me there is no support for Jihad in Islam. Islam, just like Hinduism, is a religion of death. Let’s see a Christian family or group try something like this. Oh, wait…
I forgot, teaching your children the Christian faith is psychological abuse.

Merry Christmas.

oldleprechaun on December 22, 2009 at 2:17 PM

So long as none of the wear crosses… now that would be a threat to our liberties.

/my college professors

mankai on December 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM

For me, stories like this are where the multiculturalism rubber meets the road. These people are primitive misogynist fanatics, and their culture is beneath all human dignity and decency. A good place to start would be if our schools STOPPED teaching cultural relativism, and instead said, “Hey, look over here. They mutilate girls so they can never enjoy sex. We think that’s bad. You should, too. Oppose it every time you hear of it, and DEMAND that your Western governments put an end to it in their own countries.” That would be a start.

I’ve taught my own beautiful daughters to bring up female genital mutilation every single time a teacher starts singing the cultural praises of a culture that practices it. I tell them to say, “As a feminist, I just have to say….” I don’t care how many leftist teachers it pisses off. I know that their classmates will be so shocked to hear of this for the very first time that at least half of them will go home that night, google the term, and get the real story. Then they’ll tell others. And so on.

Western government officials who allow this to go on belong in prison — for life.

Rational Thought on December 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM

FGM has no support in Islam or any other religion.

Merry Christmas, Ed, but that is just bullshit.

DaydreamBeliever on December 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM

It’s just the opposite. FGM is rampant in the muslim culture. That it goes on openly in Great Britain is proof enough that islamists don’t much give a damn what westerners think of their sick and twisted death cult.

Fletch54 on December 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Would the UK look the other way for pedophilia parties?

Yes they would, as long as it was done in the name of Islam. They already look the other way with regard to honor killings, FGM and polygamy out of fear of offending the Muslims.

cool breeze on December 22, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Nice Pixies reference, Ed.

Red Cloud on December 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Agreed. I nearly urinated in pants at work when I read that.

Shock the Monkey on December 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM

It begins.

pseudonominus on December 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM

What if some of the young women are gay, lesbians, bisexual, transgender or queer…?

Where is the outrage?

Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM

These people who commit this barbarsim on young girls shouldn’t be arrested — they should be shot in the eye.

D2Boston on December 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Try about three feet lower.

Laura in Maryland on December 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM

Allah loves me, this I know
’cause my sepsis tells me so

argos on December 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Republican or Democrat, Conservative, Liberal, or Moderate, I don’t see how any of us could not speak out against this. There is no freedom of choice here, these girls have no say in this matter. I would never pierce nor otherwise mutilate my own body, but it is my decision. I laugh at others who do so, but it is of their own doing.

I guess I don’t have a grasp of the cultural background that advocates this practice. It is about the control over the women. But I sure wouldn’t want a wife whose sexual appetite has been curbed. Maybe the excuse is that she would be less inclined to have an affair. The whole practice is basically the men cutting something off to spite themselves. Not to be perverted, but there is a lot of fun to be had for a man as well with what they are removing. It’s a sick practice, but will continue until the women have more of a voice in their societies.

CBP on December 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM

When the Archbishop of Canterbury declares Sharia a whizbang idea, all is lost.

If you haven’t read Mark Steyn’s America Alone.

Laura in Maryland on December 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM

These guys are BIG on this practice too!

Of course, Obama is now looking to ‘cut’ a deal with them!

Freddy on December 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM

This practice has been going on for decades in the UK – successive governments have done nothing about it. It’s condoned, as Rational Thought says, through the prism of cultural relativism.

One of most pernicious memes of recent years is the whole I’m-not-judging-you BS.

We should be.

Track-A-'Crat on December 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM

Yet this is not the worst practice they have. There is also Infibulation, which is essentially sewing girls up, leaving a small opening for urine and menstrual fluids.

Brought to by the Religion of Peace and other forward thinkers.

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM

I’m sure you can find a market for that procedure in Kalifornia. Just refer to it as “sexual enhancement” for older chicks. They’d pay good money to have it done.

“Oh Debbie! Let me tell what I did last week….a little BOTOX here and here, a skin peel, and my doctor put in a few stitches to tighten up my hoo-hoo. I hear all the girls are doing it. More Champagne?”

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Doesn’t matter. Ask Peter Tatchell, a gay rights campaigner in Britain. He has been ostracized by the far left in Britain for pointing out the rampant homophobia among Muslims. It seems being an uncivilized Muslim savage is higher on the lefty “victim” totem pole than being gay.

PimFortuynsGhost on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Ed, what would Ike do?

I like Ike.

Operation Wetback

Operation Wetback was a 1954 operation by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove about one million illegal immigrants from the southwestern United States, focusing on Mexican nationals. Burgeoning numbers of Mexican immigrants prompted President Dwight D. Eisenhower to appoint his longtime friend, General Joseph Swing, as INS Commissioner. According to Attorney General Herbert Brownell Jr., Eisenhower had a sense of urgency about illegal immigration upon taking office. In a letter to Sen. William Fulbright, Eisenhower quoted a report in The New York Times that said, “The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican ‘wetbacks’ (rooted from the watery route taken by the Mexican immigrants across the Rio Grande) to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government.”

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

What if some of the young women are gay, lesbians, bisexual, transgender or queer…?

Where is the outrage?

Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM

You missed the memo. To recap, there are no Muslim homo- or bi-sexuals. I do not know who told you this.

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Where are NOW and the radical feminists on this?

Nowhere, of course. They’d rather make it easier to kill baby girls than worrying about mutilating them.

On another note, the practice occurs mostly among Muslims. How’s that “religion of peace” working out for y’all?

TXUS on December 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM

Carrie Prejean is sad.

SouthernGent on December 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM

To recap, there are no Muslim homo- or bi-sexuals.
BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Bcs they are all DEAD. Their own people kill them when they find out.
Such a tolerant religion political ideology.

Badger40 on December 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM

In a polygamous society gay men will have an abundance of partners to choose from, just as they do in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

I’m sure you can find a market for that procedure in Kalifornia. Just refer to it as “sexual enhancement” for older chicks. They’d pay good money to have it done.

“Oh Debbie! Let me tell what I did last week….a little BOTOX here and here, a skin peel, and my doctor put in a few stitches to tighten up my hoo-hoo. I hear all the girls are doing it. More Champagne?”

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Actually, the ‘tightening’ procedure you refer to is a legitimate and useful operation. While frequently considered a cosmetic procedure, some insurance plans cover the procedure — known as vaginoplasty.

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

For me, stories like this are where the multiculturalism rubber meets the road. These people are primitive misogynist fanatics, and their culture is beneath all human dignity and decency.

Rational Thought on December 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM

The allure of “Diversity” ended long ago for me. Long before stories like this appeared.

The Brits are famous for their slavish devotion to contrition for having ruled 3/4 of the world and profiting mightily from slave trading.

Frankly, I think what the Brits accomplished was pretty damned remarkable and that they should offer no apologies. Yeah, we tossed them off. The Asian Indians figured it out and tossed them out. However, for many of their colonies the British presence left an enduring legacy that has served them well.

Unfortunately, Brits these days engage in a sort of weird, overdone type of self-flagellation. It seems they can’t get enough of the hair shirt and whip. But they are subject to their location and internal history. That means that they bear the marks of a class society (internal), and they are easily influenced by European Marxist influences.

Thankfully, and I think our Founding Fathers understood this, we are divorced by geography as well as the fact that many of our people were cast off by Europe or England or left by choice. We are, indeed, a special and blessed society.

That is what the Europeans, Brits and their EU government want to change. They still believe that we are colonials who must remember that they know best.

Never, ever be fooled by these bastards. That’s what the “One World Government” is all about.

Cody1991 on December 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM

This is a bad practice, but i don’t see what they can do about it.

Chudi on December 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Actually, the ‘tightening’ procedure you refer to is a legitimate and useful operation. While frequently considered a cosmetic procedure, some insurance plans cover the procedure — known as vaginoplasty.

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Gee, thanks, Mr. Buzzkill. I suppose a poll of Islamic clerics would result in a similar response regarding FGM and fibulation. Legitimate and useful. Along with beheadings, stoning, honor-killing (is that an oxymoron?), and the death penalty (for minor offenses against Islam).

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Doesn’t matter. Ask Peter Tatchell, a gay rights campaigner in Britain. He has been ostracized by the far left in Britain for pointing out the rampant homophobia among Muslims. It seems being an uncivilized Muslim savage is higher on the lefty “victim” totem pole than being gay.

PimFortuynsGhost on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Peter Tatchell is an interesting man. Did you ever watch, “10 Downing”? They had so many interesting programs on that show. I was sorry to see it go.

Cody1991 on December 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM

In a polygamous society gay men will have an abundance of partners to choose from, just as they do in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

I’m not holding my breath for the New York Times headline “Lesbians Hardest Hit”

cool breeze on December 22, 2009 at 2:45 PM

FGM is not a specifically Muslim thing; rather its a specifically barbaric thing. FGM is far from universal among Muslims and people who are not Muslims also practice FGM. The custom of FGM doesn’t stem from Islam, but Islam and FGM both stem from barbarity, so its unsurprising that the two will be found in the same communities.

YiZhangZhe on December 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM

This is a bad practice, but i don’t see what they can do about it.

Chudi on December 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Singapore doesn’t have any drug trafficking.

a capella on December 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM

Headline at a site that used to be the go-to place, for stories like this…

Why I covet the Presidential teabags, Part 45:

Extremist right wing, crypto neo double super secret Nazi, Ed Morrissey joins up with RS McCain, who once actually talked to someone bad, in 2002, to spew hate towards the very Moderate friends who are doing nothing more than practicing their very Moderate religion, making Morrissey, McCain, Palin, Beck, and Malkin…

RACISTS!!1!!1!

MNHawk on December 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM

cool breeze on December 22, 2009 at 2:45 PM

Lol!

aengus on December 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Not in the Koran, no… But not in islam? Which version Ed?

Irritable Pundit on December 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Snip snip. You are racists for even questioning their rights to abuse their daughters.

Mr. Joe on December 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM

The religion of pieces.

Johan Klaus on December 22, 2009 at 3:01 PM

Fair is fair: They should also require Muslim men to have an equivalent operation.

And foreskin-ectomy doesn’t count. It’s all or nothing, dude.

ZenDraken on December 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM

This is a bad practice, but i don’t see what they can do about it.

Chudi on December 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Imprison the culprits?

Johan Klaus on December 22, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Time was when Charles Johnson would have been all over this. Today he posts pictures of fences, stupid sh*t that Huckabee says, and cherry-picks comments from Hot Air to show how wingnutty and hateful we all are. Didn’t he used to get all upset when lefties did that to him back when he used to talk about the “Religion of Pieces” and RoPMA?

Pervygrin on December 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM

Are you burning with the clitoral pieces of iSlam?

Bicyea on December 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM

Castrate the men to lesson their desire.
See how fast the government responds. I’ll bet with the first castration, they prosecute.

lonestar1 on December 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM

They already ARE castrated, apparently.

leftnomore on December 22, 2009 at 3:13 PM

Mord on December 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM

We can’t be prosecuting people for their religious beliefs after all, right?

Not unless they’re Christians, that is, in which case their beliefs are clearly hate crimes.

The book Slave: My True Story , by Mende Nazer and Damien Lewis, is the autobiography of a young Sudanese woman who was abducted and sold into slavery in the early 1990s.

Her Sudanese family is Muslim, and practiced FGM along with the rest of their village. Mende was “circumcised” at about the age of 11, nearly a year before she was abducted. Her first person account of the experience is horrifying.

The truly sad thing about FGM as it was described by Mende is that her parents honestly believed they were doing the best thing they could for their daughter’s future. In their culture, she would have had no hope of marrying if she wasn’t circumcised.

The relationship of FGM to Islam is made clear when Mende’s Muslim Arab slave owner threatens to have her circumcised if Mende doesn’t obey. The irony is that Mende had already been circumcised, but the slave owners refused to accept that she was in fact a Muslim herself, and forbade her from practicing her beliefs.

mcc4 on December 22, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Fair is fair: They should also require Muslim men to have an equivalent operation.

And foreskin-ectomy doesn’t count. It’s all or nothing, dude.

ZenDraken on December 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Muslim slave traders practiced radical castration on their African captives enroute to their desert hellholes. Radical meaning ALL. A quarter of their abductees died from the procedure, but a small price to pay to ensure the purity of Muslim *cough*Arab*cough* blood.

Maquis on December 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM

What if some of the young women are gay, lesbians, bisexual, transgender or queer…?
Seven Percent Solution on December 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Oh, then they just kill them.

pseudonominus on December 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM

Nuts!

faraway on December 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM

Just to set the record straight, FGM is not about sexual desire. It is about marriageability.

In more than 28 African countries, mainly in a belt north of the equator from The Gambia to Somalia, in parts of the Middle East and Far East, little girls undergo this procedure.

Mothers take their young daughters to a midwife, or gedda, where the little girls are strapped in a chair or held by several older women, sometimes breaking leg bones or collar bones in the struggle. The gedda uses a razor to cut away part or all of the external genitalia (the clitoris, labia minora, with or without the inner surfaces of labia majora). The gedda pulls the raw surfaces together, traditionally with thorns, and then ties the child’s legs together while it heals leaving a very small opening for sex. The suture line must be opened to allow for childbirth but wives often get sewn back up after delivery to recreate the smaller opening for their husbands.

Justification for the practice is all wrapped up in tradition and culture and religion, but the bottom line is marriageability. Little girls who are “cut” have a better chance of being married because men prefer the smaller opening.

Evelyn Sakeah, research officer with the Navrango Health Research Centre, has studied the male preference for circumcised wives and believes, “If men would openly state a preference to marry non-circumcised women, FGM would probably cease, since the tradition per se has no value.”

doctormom on December 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM

But it is a woman’s right to choose, just like an abortion. Bleedsblue ought to be all for this. We conservatives need to be tolerent of the diversity.

We shouldn’t be so narrow minded. Those from Muslim and African countries are for:
Slavery
FGM
Multiple wives
Killing the wife/daughter if she acts up
Women may not be educated

barnone on December 22, 2009 at 3:33 PM

Maybe we should check that health care bill to make sure there isn’t any provision for female circumcision.

God! What is the West doing to itself???

gary fouse on December 22, 2009 at 3:46 PM


… “parties” involving up to 20 girls to save money.

In America that statement has a totally different meaning.

Third world barbarism, coming soon to a girl’s school near you.

Tony737 on December 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM

Castrate the men to lesson their desire. – Lone Star

That may be the only thing that’ll save Merry Olde England.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali wrote about when it was done to her in her book “Infidel”. It was a horrifying but all-too-imformative read. – Broken Rattle

Yeah, that part was pretty graphic and hard to get through. Very sad and it didn’t work, she still had a boyfriend.

Tony737 on December 22, 2009 at 3:56 PM

It’s not in the Koran, but the Hadiths say that female genital mutilation, while not mandated, is a good thing to do.

JKahn913 on December 22, 2009 at 3:57 PM

Unfortunately, Brits these days engage in a sort of weird, overdone type of self-flagellation. It seems they can’t get enough of the hair shirt and whip.

Very fanciful.

But they are subject to their location and internal history. That means that they bear the marks of a class society (internal), and they are easily influenced by European Marxist influences.
Cody1991 on December 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM

Your description makes a good read but I believe it to be essentially false.

The class structure that used to exist has all but vanished. Karl Marx has had less influence in the UK than many other places, despite his being buried in Highgate, London.

What I observe in British people is a curious form of arrogance … not with haughtiness or a sense of superiority, but as if they think the UK exists of its own accord and will do so, unmoved, until the end of time. It is as if the possibility of catastrophic national failure has never occurred to them.

I suspect this is because, unlike most of the rest of Europe, the UK has so far avoided the boot of oppressive regimes and was last conquered more than 900 years ago.

The people who steer the UK are over-confident and have not understood the nation’s merits and weaknesses relative to other nations and ideologies. They don’t know what is foundational and what is merely decorative.

It is, in my view, this combination of arrogance and lack of understanding (rather than self-flagellation) that causes UK politicians and activists to recklessly adopt policies that attack and undermine everything that holds the country safely together.

YiZhangZhe on December 22, 2009 at 3:58 PM

One more reason not to marry a muslim chick.

Alden Pyle on December 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM

We would like a conviction, not against the parents…

Why the @%#$ not? Without the parents ok, it does NOT happen.

Jeff2161 on December 22, 2009 at 4:12 PM

Little girls who are “cut” have a better chance of being married because men prefer the smaller opening.

Makes them feel like BIG studs, no doubt.

Jeff2161 on December 22, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Gee, thanks, Mr. Buzzkill. I suppose a poll of Islamic clerics would result in a similar response regarding FGM and fibulation. Legitimate and useful. Along with beheadings, stoning, honor-killing (is that an oxymoron?), and the death penalty (for minor offenses against Islam).

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM

If you bother to refer to my first post you quoted at 2:42, you will find that I was the first in this thread to refer to infibulation, which is an abhorrent form of FGM. It is NOT THE SAME as vaginoplasty. Look them both up on wiki.

GnuBreed on December 22, 2009 at 4:20 PM

…they think the UK exists of its own accord and will do so, unmoved, until the end of time. It is as if the possibility of catastrophic national failure has never occurred to them.
YiZhangZhe on December 22, 2009 at 3:58 PM

This is a common aspect of far-left liberals: They take the existing civilization for granted. They assume civilization will always be there for them, that they will always have food, clothing, and shelter. They have no clue about the economics, the technology, and the institutions that hold it all together.

ZenDraken on December 22, 2009 at 4:44 PM

You know I had my Genitals mutilated as well shortly after birth, but as a male, nobody gave a crap.

ronsfi on December 22, 2009 at 5:05 PM

Not part of Islam? Thats right Ed and Christmas trees are not part of the Bible either but they help enhance the Christmas season. FGM helps enhance the Muslim concept of female oppression. It fits them like a glove. It’s happening right now in Little Mogadishu out your way Ed. Check it out, or is that section of the city a no-go zone?

BL@KBIRD on December 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Time was when Charles Johnson would have been all over this. Today he posts pictures of fences, stupid sh*t that Huckabee says, and cherry-picks comments from Hot Air to show how wingnutty and hateful we all are. Didn’t he used to get all upset when lefties did that to him back when he used to talk about the “Religion of Pieces” and RoPMA?

Pervygrin on December 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM

These days, the only outrage Charles would find in this story is the lengths to which these poor, peace-loving Muslim immigrants have to go in order to mutilate their little girls, when the NHS could provide this “service” to them for free were it not for “oppressive laws” springing from right wing racism, hatred and xenophobia.

And frankly, I’ll bet anything that the only reason the Independent actually published this story is to “start the dialog” about making NHS-provided FGM a reality in the UK.

Gator Country on December 22, 2009 at 7:35 PM

BobMbx on December 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Seriously, already happening. They uh…um…well…they sort of put it back. Why, I have no idea. Annual GYN visit is bad enough, but some people have more money than good sense.

Laura in Maryland on December 23, 2009 at 12:39 AM

FGM is not a Muslim issue.

The origins of female circumcision and female genital mutilation are unknown. It is believed that female genital mutilation originated in Africa as far back as the fifth century B.C. and has taken place in ancient Egypt, ancient Rome, Arabia, and Tsarist Russia. Ancient female Egyptian mummies were found to be circumcised, “suggesting that it was practiced as a sign of distinction” (Nour, 2000, para. 5). It was used in England during the Victorian period to treat psychological disorders and to prevent masturbation in women (Hopkins, 1999). In Europe and in the United States as late as the 1930′s, “removal of the clitoris or prepuce was performed to treat clitoral enlargement, redundancy, hysteria, lesbianism, and erotomania” (Nour, para. 5).

Ed Laskie on December 23, 2009 at 7:30 AM

Would the UK look the other way for pedophilia parties?

Why yes they would. If the perps were muslims.

Squiggy on December 23, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Comment pages: 1 2