Did the $400 tax cut get halved?; Update: No
posted at 10:12 am on December 15, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Note: See update below. The tax cut is applied elsewhere.
Barack Obama campaigned on a promise to give middle-class Americans a tax cut as soon as he got into office. Early this year, he enacted a cut that promised a $400 reduction in taxes through the hilariously named Making Work Pay tax credit program, and adjusted withholding tables to reduce the weekly tax bite by $13 to put the money in our pockets immediately. Now the 2009 tax tables have been published, and the tax cut looks like half of what was promised.
First, let’s look at the tax tables for single filers in income levels between $5,000 and $65,000 per year, comparing the 2008 tables to 2009:
| Taxable income | 2008 Tax | 2009 Tax | Cut |
| $5,000 | $503 | $503 | $0 |
| $10,000 | $1,103 | $1,086 | $17 |
| $15,000 | $1,853 | $1,836 | $17 |
| $20,000 | $2,603 | $2,586 | $17 |
| $25,000 | $3,353 | $3,336 | $17 |
| $30,000 | $4,103 | $4,086 | $17 |
| $35,000 | $5,100 | $4,944 | $156 |
| $40,000 | $6,350 | $6,194 | $156 |
| $45,000 | $7,600 | $7,444 | $156 |
| $50,000 | $8,850 | $8,694 | $156 |
| $55,000 | $10,100 | $9,944 | $156 |
| $60,000 | $11,350 | $11,194 | $156 |
| $65,000 | $12,600 | $12,444 | $156 |
As we can see, we’re solidly in the middle class, well above the national average income of $50,000, and the tax cut only comes to $156 — less than half of what Obama promised. However, some may claim that Obama promised that tax cut to middle-class families, which means we should be looking at the Head of Household columns instead. Of course, the withholding got reduced on an individual basis, which means single filers will have more taxes to pay at the end of the year, but it’s a fair point.
This time, let’s look at the family tax rate difference between 2008 and 2009, all the way through to $88,000 per year. That’s four times the poverty level, and it’s where the federal government would cut off health-insurance subsidies in ObamaCare if it passes. Do we get $400 in tax savings per family for these middle-class households?
| Taxable income | 2008 Tax | 2009 Tax | Cut |
| $5,000 | $503 | $503 | $0 |
| $10,000 | $1,003 | $1,003 | $0 |
| $15,000 | $1,681 | $1,656 | $25 |
| $20,000 | $2,431 | $2,406 | $25 |
| $25,000 | $3,181 | $3,156 | $25 |
| $30,000 | $3,931 | $3,906 | $25 |
| $35,000 | $4,681 | $4,656 | $25 |
| $40,000 | $5,431 | $5,406 | $25 |
| $45,000 | $6,319 | $6,156 | $163 |
| $50,000 | $7,569 | $7,359 | $210 |
| $55,000 | $8,819 | $8,609 | $210 |
| $60,000 | $10,069 | $9,859 | $210 |
| $65,000 | $11,319 | $11,109 | $210 |
| $70,000 | $12,569 | $12,359 | $210 |
| $75,000 | $13,819 | $13,609 | $210 |
| $80,000 | $15,069 | $14,859 | $210 |
| $85,000 | $16,319 | $16,109 | $210 |
| $88,000 | $17,069 | $16,859 | $210 |
No, we don’t. In fact, we only see slightly more than half of the promised savings through $88,000 incomes. Do we ever see $400 in income-tax cuts? Not on the 1040 tax schedules as printed, which only go to annual income levels of $99,000, and where the reduction remains $210 for families.
It looks like Obama has made Making Work Pay into a net cost at the end of the year for taxpayers. Other tax credits will come into play, too, but the withholding relates directly to these tax tables — and it looks like Obama’s program forced everyone to underpay their taxes this year.
Update: I’ve gotten updates from two readers who point out that the MWP credit gets applied separately on the 2009 1040. It’s not part of the tax tables, as HA reader Hillary explains:
I don’t care for Obama either, but your article about the tax credit getting halved is incorrect. If you look on an 09 form you will see that you still get the $400 or $800per family. It appears separately below the total tax and separately on the return as a schedule M. The Making Work Pay credit was not built into the tax tables as you showed. So, technically people are getting the usual tax table adjustment for inflation of $156 PLUS the $400 or the $210 + the $800 for families.
And that’s good news for everyone. Thanks for the clarification.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Duh. This is what we’ve been saying for a year now.
lorien1973 on December 15, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Such happens when a Walt Disney character is elected POTUS
bluegrass on December 15, 2009 at 10:16 AM
I’m surprised there’s any tax cut. I had read that all they did was adjust the withholding tables so you kept more of your money — at least up to tax time when you’d be surprised to owe more than you expected.
So this is good, if trivial news.
Strick on December 15, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Well, he said it.
Therefore, it’s a lie.
notagool on December 15, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Gee, I’m so surprised.
Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, Hope and Change, …
johnsteele on December 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM
What??? Osama Obama lied again???
Noooo…not possible! Isn’t he Abe Lincoln, George Washington and some kind of god all rolled up into a magnificent, earth-bestriding package?
Say it isn’t so, Ed!
MrScribbler on December 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM
President Obama lied? No! I won’t believe it!
myrenovations on December 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Thanks for the breadcrumbs champ.
Meric1837 on December 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Just words translated to just numbers.
Kissmygrits on December 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM
“Do I look like Mrs. Obama”?
milwife88 on December 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Obowma Lied, the Country Died.
Juno77 on December 15, 2009 at 10:21 AM
I do know that the IQ in the oval office got halved.
Vashta.Nerada on December 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Oh, yeah. I saw my tax preparer over the weekend and she said it’s true. She said this may cause some people to OWE when they’re used to getting a refund.
That’s really going to be a strong slap in the face on 4.15.10 and in the middle of primary campaigning!
Oink on December 15, 2009 at 10:23 AM
“Will you kiss me?”
“Excuse me?”
“Will you KISS me?”
DrStock on December 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM
A year from now, we won’t be sweating a $400 tax cut. We’ll be preoccupied with massive tax increases instead.
Doughboy on December 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM
and how about the $8,000 for new mortgages? that money is taxable. and alot of those people don’t know it.
kelley in virginia on December 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM
More opportunity for patriotism!
/Joe Biden
mankai on December 15, 2009 at 10:25 AM
back up to you Oink about some people owing taxes instead of a refund:
this will sound really mean, but I have paid so much for so long that I sure would someone else to pitch in.
sorry. I will try to go back to Christmas spirit & Republican principles now.
kelley in virginia on December 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM
I think there is going to be a revolt on 4/15/10. People are so stupid. They rely on that big check in the spring but they are not getting any fed taken out right now and haven’t for a whil;e.
People looking for the tax day widfall are going to instead be listening to those IRS tax firm commercials.
ORconservative on December 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Unfortunately, you are absolutely correct.
Al in St. Lou on December 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Oh, I know it… but if you knew how ill-handled the program is, well, you’d believe it. My “credit” has been delayed since July… I called the IRS (again) last week and they told me the program was wreaking with fraud. The guy I was speaking with told me he knows of a 4-year-old who got the credit.
mankai on December 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM
its been so long since i’ve gotten a refund–are there alot of people who haven’t been paying w/holding (which i never did because I didn’t want the govt to have use of my money all year) that will have to pay on 4/15? more than usual, you think?
kelley in virginia on December 15, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Once thise is more widely known, the Dems will create some retro-tax cut so people will not have to pay the difference.
WashJeff on December 15, 2009 at 10:29 AM
mankai: yeah, some guy got on one of the FNC’s afternoon shows to talk about the fraud in that program (at least i think it was that specific program. so many programs, so much fraud).
kelley in virginia on December 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM
B+ in math.
albill on December 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM
You are in really good form today! Priceless!
jwolf on December 15, 2009 at 10:31 AM
The tax was never cut. The government only withheld less money each week from people’s pay, but the rates never changed.
My employer let all of us know and helped us. We were informed that it would be wise to refile our W4 forms to withhold an extra $10-15 a week to avoid owing the IRS at the end of the year.
Again–another scam by Democrats, to appear to help when they weren’t helping us by so much as a penny.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM
I adjusted my withholdings to undo that change back in April. I’d rather owe than get a refund, but I don’t like to owe a lot, and certainly don’t like to owe penalties.
SnowSun on December 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Thanks for the heads-up.
I’m going to send my son to my parent’s place for awhile, so the IRS can’t find him.
BPD on December 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM
This is going to tank his popularity even further. He can get on national television all he wants and blather on about how banks are evil and Bush did a bad bad thing etc but when you do your taxes and are told that you need to give the government more money you realize it’s all a farce.
Oh, and these same people are going to create a government run health-insurance scheme that will insure 30+ million Americans and reduce the deficit at the same time?
gwelf on December 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Neat. An early Christmas present from da won. Just dandy.
JusDreamin on December 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM
One song where you do not have to alter the lyrics. Funny to think that Lennon and McCartney are libs and wrote this song (they even protest the Death Tax at the end):
Let me tell you how it will be,
There’s one for you, nineteen for me,
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
Should five per cent appear too small,
Be thankful I don’t take it all.
‘Cos I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
(If you drive a car ), I’ll tax the street,
(If you try to sit ), I’ll tax your seat,
(If you get too cold ), I’ll tax the heat,
(If you take a walk ), I’ll tax your feet.
Taxman.
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
Don’t ask me what I want it for
(Taxman! Mister Wilson!)
If you don’t want to pay some more
(Taxman! Mister Heath!),
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
Now my advice for those who die, (Taxman!)
Declare the pennies on your eyes, (Taxman!)
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
And you’re working for no-one but me,
(Taxman).
WashJeff on December 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Yeah, but to be fair, that 4 y.o. was using it to start a brothel. Look, more jobs created!
/sarc
All that happened was the withholding tables were jiggered. There was no tax cut. You owe the money later rather than sooner, but you still owe it. Calling it a “tax cut” is yet another lie by Obowmao.
rbj on December 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Hope and change is really just smoke and mirrors.
scalleywag on December 15, 2009 at 10:40 AM
There’s going to be a hit to spending starting in the first or second week of January, as millions of tax payers discover that either they owe more than they usually do, or that their refunds are going to be smaller than expected.
Less spending will result in a drop in economic activity.
MarkTheGreat on December 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Dammit all!!!
I was gonna buy a house with that.
BigWyo on December 15, 2009 at 10:42 AM
The people that do not know this are probably not the types to do their taxes early.
WashJeff on December 15, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Hoax and Change.
TXUS on December 15, 2009 at 10:43 AM
$210? WOW!! I can go to the movies a few times a year. Thanks Barry.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:44 AM
I wonder if the libs who didn’t change their W4 forms and find in January they owe the government $400 or more are going to let Obowma keep his B+.
This is going to be a laugh riot!
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Geitner’s Tax Cut software has screwed up yet again.
BigWyo on December 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM
I’m sure this is a problem Obambi inherited.
ctmom on December 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Well, I HOPE I don’t owe taxes because of this, if so I’ll have to go out and panhandle for spare CHANGE. That’s HOPE AND CHANGE for you.
LODGE4 on December 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM
I filed ammended 2008 return to take the interest free 7500….last July. Just got a letter from the IRS stating it would be granted–but in 6 to 8 weeks. That’s over 8 months!
Youngs98 on December 15, 2009 at 10:47 AM
It won’t happen. People who voted for Obama are idiots. And idiots get tax refunds because they don’t realize getting a refund means an interest free loan to the govt for a year.
So instead of getting say a $2500 refund without the “tax cut” they get a $2100 refund. But they still think they paid no taxes and hence Obama is wonderful because he sent them a check.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:47 AM
But don’t buy any popcorn. It’s bad for your health and will cost the government more money.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM
I suspect the Fed is going to have other more important things to worry about come April. Especially when they find out that there will most likely be about a 30% reduction in the amount of tax revenues they are projecting. Now that is going to leave a mark.
Johnnyreb on December 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Obviously the middle class need more a tax break?
We will have to slightly increase the rate of the top tax bracket to bump up all these middle class numbers to an even $400, but that seems to be what Ed wants.
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM
WashJeff – George Harrison wrote Taxman, not Lennon/Mccartney. The Beatles were being taxed 90% in England back then !!! NINETY PERCENT !!!!!!!!!!!!
LODGE4 on December 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Youngs98 on December 15, 2009 at 10:47 AM
mankai on December 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM
What the hell you people doing buying a house now? Prices will be falling for years to come. The $8K and $7.5K credits you got will be wiped out many times over.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM
AGAIN
1. Mistake?
or
2. Planned?
marklmail on December 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Only if “we” ignores every family earning less than $50K/yr. this past year of unemployment.
I don’t quite follow the fairness rationale that those earning 40-45K paying roughly 7.5% get a smaller proportionate cut for survival than those earning more at 50K paying roughly 7.1% getting a larger proportioned tax cut.
It must be that spreading the wealth benefits those earning over $50,000/yr at the literal taxed expense of those families earning the $40-45K income.
maverick muse on December 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Because cutting spending is never in your thought process.
WashJeff on December 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Would make a great bumper sticker…
Trusser13 on December 15, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Exactly. We should tax all the rich people at 100% to make them poor. Then that will make all the poor people rich. That plan has worked each and every time it has been tried.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:51 AM
BTW: Obama campaigned on all kinds of refundable tax credits. With all the nonsense involved in his first year, have he and Congress gotten around to enacting those credits?
If so, good luck with the forms and instructions, Obama supporters. You’ll love all the extra compliance.
BuckeyeSam on December 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM
That explains it. 90% tax rate…that is NUTS!!! And to think the remaining 10% was split with divorced wives!
WashJeff on December 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM
I know, but there are plenty of co-workers who didn’t believe what the company posted and what I was telling them. So many of them are going to get hit the end of this year.
I expect many will blame Bush, but I’ll just smile and avoid saying “I told you so.”
Others already ‘expect’ a certain figure, but are going to just sh*t when they see their numbers are reduced. Again, comedy gold for me. I’m in NY and most of my co-workers are Dems. This is going to be so entertaining!
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM
That’s all the Dem/Libs have ever offered. Come tax day, something will be used to distract the plebes or somehow it will be blamed on Bush/Republicans.
Jvette on December 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Yes, exactly. “Bump up” the top tax bracket from 35% to 100%, that is exactly what I meant. Way to read between the lines!
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Those so-called “credits” are wrapped inside the mortgage to be paid by the home buyer. Bush did likewise with his so-called tax “rebates” that tax payers had to refund back to the IRS; that costing tax payers a lot in the processing of funds back and forth.
maverick muse on December 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Obama’s lies are causing the planet to warm along with all working American families.
Hening on December 15, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Actually when the Beatles wrote that song the tax rate was 95%, not 90%.
Lyrics:
Let me tell you how it will be;
There’s one for you, nineteen for me.
‘Cause I’m the taxman,
Yeah, I’m the taxman.
Should five per cent appear too small,
Be thankful I don’t take it all.
19 for the tax man, 1 for the worker. Sounds about right in the eyes of liberals.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Hey Ed, another bomb went off in Kabul is it on the wires?
They didn’t kill anyone, my email said they were targeting the opposing Presidential Candidate anyway that’s the rumor. The bomb blew out some windows.
Dr Evil on December 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Yep. The devil’s in the details.
maverick muse on December 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM
The one detail libs never mention is that no poor person ever gave someone else a lasting, well-paying job.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
HA! If you really want to see tax cuts, look at what the ORIGINAL tax rates were…
And remember, the 16th amendment was referred to and passed as a “Tax on the rich”.
Amendment X on December 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
And just when I was deciding that I wouldn’t need any whiskey today…
lovingmyUSA on December 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Well why not? When it goes from 35 to 45, you idiots will demand it goes to 55, then 65, then 75. It’s never enough for you. If anyone gets to keep as much as 1% of their earnings the imbeciles of the left scream about how unfair it is.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM
“WHY DO YOU WANNA DO SEX TO ME?”
royzer on December 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM
He tried his best. I’ll give him a solid B+.
visions on December 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM
You’re assuming there’s a ‘thought process’ involved somewhere??
BigWyo on December 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM
We need to make a deal with liberals: We’ll stay out of their wombs if they’ll stay out of our wallets.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM
That’s why most of the people I work with, including myself, increased their withholding as soon as this went into effect.
‘course, it helps that we all help program payroll software, so we knew the impact of this.
Also, don’t expect some big uproar in January. You only get your W2′s in January, at some point. It isn’t until you actually fill out your 1040 that you know how much you owe, or are due a refund.
Anyone who is due refund better get your 1040 filed ASAP, in case the government has to start handing out IOU’s for the refunds.
And if you owe, I’d wait to the last minute to file, and even get an extension, just to delay payment as much as possible.
That should throw a little monkey wrench in the whole process.
Keith_Indy on December 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Just wait til the Bush tax cuts expire the following year. More hope and change.
Brat4life on December 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Brilliant ideas!
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM
How dare you question the competence, intellect, honesty, demeanor, and motives of our benevolent Nobel Laureate boy king!!!
Sugar Land on December 15, 2009 at 11:02 AM
The imaginary tax scheme you’ve cooked up in your paranoia sounds scary!
Here’s a challenge for you: if you can give a link to anyone “on the left” saying “getting to keep 1% of your earnings it is unfair!” I will never post on HotAir again.
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Double whammy, the $8K “credit” is inserted back into the fine print of the mortgage money owed incrementally. Must be gifted by the same braintrusts marketing balloon payment plans in the 1980s.
maverick muse on December 15, 2009 at 11:03 AM
What does this mean? I read this as “we’ll keep abortion legal if there are tax cuts” or something like that. Really?
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Obama is going to speak at Home Depot!
Seems fitting since that is where all the day laborers congregate and I imagine there are more of them now than there were Jan. 20th of this year.
Jvette on December 15, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Goodbye e-pirate…
http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/03/17/2009-03-17_aig_bonus_checks_may_be_taxed_at_up_to_1.html
The bombshell revelation from State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo came as Congress warned AIG execs to return their millions in bonuses – or face a possible new law taxing those payouts at up to 100%.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 11:08 AM
After the inevitable hyper-inflation hits, that “tax cut” won’t buy you a stick of gum.
Rebar on December 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Tax cut for families making under $80k is $200 less than expected = the country died.
Maybe its time to take a break from politics, before you have an aneurysm.
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Of course it’s unfair for any of us to keep anything we work for. We are “advantaged” and have stolen all our wealth from the lessor fortunate. Didn’t you know that? Attribute nothing to hard work and a keen intellect. It’s all based on stepping on the little guy. Sheesh.
Crusader Rabbit on December 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM
No. That was sarcasm and hyperbole.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Bonuses are not “all their income.” Sorry.
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Yep, there he is again, Home depot, just a sec, gotta mute this monkey again.
royzer on December 15, 2009 at 11:11 AM
It’s a sarcastic reference to the fact that they will never let us keep our own money. Seeing this, I expect to pay penalties this year.
sabbahillel on December 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM
I’m curious: are those who bought cars under the Clunkers program required to count the government portion as income?
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Shocka!! The lib troll breaks his promise.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 11:13 AM
As most astute taxpayers noted, there was no real tax cut but merely a change in the withholding tables.
The socialist in charge of our country do not like tax cuts but, with the media’s help, are good at fooling the general populace.
BTW with all the state increases in taxes and fees, and well everything, I will have almost 10% less take home this year than last with a flat income.
Gee thanks Mr. Skittle-shitting Unicorn guy.
jukin on December 15, 2009 at 11:13 AM
If this horrible “steal from the hardworking to give money to the lazy” dystopia you’ve created in your mind really were true, then it would imply that smart people would have more incentive to be unemployed than actually work, as they would get all the money anyway. Since you’ve got such a keen intellect, you should probably put in your two weeks notice.
Or maybe your wild exaggeration isn’t close to reality?
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Nor will they ever let go of abortion.
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Don’t forget C4C was taxable too. As a guess, the golf cart (er, electric car) subsidy is taxable as well.
GnuBreed on December 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Good bye again e-pirate…
“The easiest way to enforce this would be setting a 100 per cent income tax rate for the combined income from all sources (including share allocations, allowances etc)”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/blogs/frontline/2821218/Put-a-cap-on-eye-popping-incomes
Come on troll, keep your promise this time.
angryed on December 15, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Actually, people work for reasons other than money–like that they have an inherent need to accomplish something.
Add in greed, too, if you like that term–like starting a business to maybe one day become wealthy enough to oppress the less-fortunate.
(BTW–that last was sarcasm)
Liam on December 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM
I don’t think they are going to come up with a tax credit at all. I think they are hoping for a surge in revenues and to balance the billing of the peons they are going to have health care passed.
I think people are going to revolt over tax day. Unless “Obama’s stash” can cover people’s irs bill, there is going to be some furious dumba$$es.
ORconservative on December 15, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Silly angryed, you still didn’t do it.
Here’s your quote:
Here’s the quote from the story you linked, including the parts you left off:
In summary, the story is talking about a maximum income level, so people would still make, in this scenario, $250k. Thus, they would not be taxed “all their income” as you suggested before.
And through your dishonest quote attempt, for which you have been busted, you fail teh internets. Thanks for playing. Sorry, you lose. Here are some loving parting gifts.
e-pirate on December 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »