Iran paper describes work on nuclear detonation devices in 2007

posted at 12:15 pm on December 14, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The Washington Post reports that the Iranians worked for four years on a neutron initiator, an essential part of a trigger for nuclear warheads.  A document under review shows that work continuing through 2007, all during the period when the US intelligence community claimed in a controversial national intelligence estimate (NIE) that the Iranians had ceased work on nuclear weapons in 2003.  Called a “smoking gun” by one Post source, the document exposes that 2007 NIE as a piece of political hackery that put the entire world at risk:

Western and U.N. nuclear officials are evaluating a secret Iranian technical document that appears to show the country’s nuclear scientists testing a key component used in the detonation of a nuclear warhead, according to intelligence officials and weapons experts familiar with the document.

The document, if authenticated, could rank as one of the strongest pieces of evidence pointing to a clandestine Iranian effort to build nuclear weapons, said former intelligence officials and weapons experts. They were responding to a published report of alleged sophisticated research by Iran on one of the final stages in the construction of a nuclear device.

Excerpts from the technical paper, first reported on the Times of London Web site late Sunday, detail a four-year program by Iranian scientists to develop and test a neutron initiator, a device used to trigger a nuclear explosion.

Although the document is undated, the Times quoted foreign intelligence officials as saying it was written in 2007, more than four years after U.S. intelligence agencies believe Iran stopped research on a nuclear warhead.

In 2007, the NIE handicapped George Bush from seeking tougher sanctions and other methods of curtailing the Iranian nuclear weapons program.  Even at that time, European governments scoffed at the notion that Iran had stopped working on nukes.  The Bush administration protested that the reversal of the CIA was politically motivated, a charge which Democrats in Congress rejected as they used the NIE to paint Bush as a dangerous warmonger.

If Iran was developing a neutron initiator, then they were working on nuclear weapons.  The Post explains that a neutron initiator has no other purpose.  Even if, as one former inspector suggested, the Iranians just wanted to “get their research ducks in a row,” it shows that the Iranians have actively attempted to produce a workable bomb design.

All they would need after achieving that would be some enriched uranium to complete a device that could be either launched on a missile, or more likely, smuggled into a target by one of its proxy terrorist armies, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or other terrorist groups.  I wonder where they might find that uranium?  Possibly at the secret enrichment facility that US intel had already discovered before the 2007 NIE?

After the invasion of Iraq, Congress seemed very interested in the politicization of intelligence regarding Saddam Hussein’s WMD capabilities.  Will Congress take an interest in how the US intel community suddenly and inexplicably reversed itself on Iran in 2007, and managed to deflect American efforts to contain a threat that now looks close to dawning on the entire world?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Called a “smoking gun” by one Post source, the document exposes that 2007 NIE as a piece of political hackery that put the entire world at risk:

Seems to be a lot of that going around lately.

Ordinary1 on December 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM

So yeah when will the Libs apologize and admit Bush was actually right huh?

Defector01 on December 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM

But… I heard from high profile sources that this is a peaceful program. It all makes no sense, unless you consider these sources either liars or morons. And we can’t do that… these are politicians after all, the paragons of virtue.

Wineaholic on December 14, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Iran is going to get as much work done on their nuclear program now because they know that Obama isn’t going to do anything to them. . . even if Iran detonates a nuclear bomb on Washington DC.

ThackerAgency on December 14, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Who wants to bet that a great many of the willing AGW dupes are doing the “three monkeys” act on Iran’s nukes?

Unless the military is able to scare some sense and spine into the toddler in a man suit we have for POTUS, it looks like this is a job for Israel.

Dark-Star on December 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Thanks for all your ineptitude Mohammad El Baradei.

fourdeucer on December 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM

So yeah when will the Libs apologize and admit Bush was actually right huh?
Defector01 on December 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM

It’ll never happen. In fact, the only lib who might address this issue is Joe Lieberman and, if that happens, we’ll all get a refresher course on why Howard Dean tried to drum him out of the party. If the libs couldn’t muster a stand against the old Soviet Union, then there’s no way they’ll unite against a nuclear Iran.

joejm65 on December 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Take back the House in 2010 and haul the authors of the 2007 NIE in front of the Intelligence Committee under oath.

Wethal on December 14, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Iran is just a tiny country. Nothing to see here.

txag92 on December 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM

When are heads going to roll at the CIA? Congress, on both sides of the aisle, should be furious about this.

rlyle on December 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Old GW is looking pretty good about now.

faol on December 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Thanks for all your ineptitude Mohammad El Baradei.

fourdeucer on December 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM

No, he is accomplishing his real goal… an Islamic Bomb.

NO ONE could be this inept without trying.

Romeo13 on December 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Take back the House in 2010 and haul the authors of the 2007 NIE in front of the Intelligence Committee under oath.

Wethal on December 14, 2009 at 12:29 PM

2nd!

cmsinaz on December 14, 2009 at 12:59 PM

I miss W!!

cmsinaz on December 14, 2009 at 1:02 PM

So yeah when will the Libs apologize and admit Bush was actually right huh?

At the “First Annual Winter Carnival” in Hell. ALL the libs will be in attendance.

oldleprechaun on December 14, 2009 at 1:05 PM

We have wasted trillions of dollars on the CIA – an organization that almost always gets it wrong on the big issues.

Sheerq on December 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Its clearly for peacefull power production…..

ha ha

sonofdy on December 14, 2009 at 1:18 PM

***
Just cut the Iranian Hitler and the Mullahs a little slack. They do really need neutron initiators to get their peaceful nuclear reactor power stations (aka bombs) fired up.
***
Did you expect them to use a handful of matches to “light em up” and bring the 12th. Imam out of the well to save the world? All it will take is a little Hillary Clinton SMART POWER diplomacy and negotiation to convince them of their errors.
***
Or maybe Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli Military will provide the desired “neutron sources” when they bomb the factories before they output the first bomb.
***
John Bibb
***

rocketman on December 14, 2009 at 1:20 PM

All of us, and I mean ALL conservatives knew then the NIE estimate was purely political. It was just as obvious in 2007 that Iran was trying to make nuclear weapons as now, triggers notwithstanding.

They were liars in the NIE who in 2007 were putting the masses of innocent lives into harm’s way all around the world, in the name of peace… we all know the routine…

Forget the NIE of 2007; what is anyone going to do about it now, or ever? Seems as long as Russia is okay with the most threatening country in the world getting the most powerful WMDs in the world, there’s little we can do, since they have U.N. veto power. Not unless Obama decides to buck the U.N, and go rogue..(zip) Nobody can remotely imagine that. Talk talk talk is Obama’s moniker, and come to think of it, the U.N.’s as well!

Danzo on December 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Yes, and Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction. I still can’t get over that one.

bloggless on December 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM

How did Bush and Cheney and Halliburton get a “secret Iranian technical document” faked after they left office?

eeyore on December 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM

What we have here, is a failure to communicate.

royzer on December 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Wethal on December 14, 2009 at 12:29 PM

+1

Al in St. Lou on December 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM

As I noted in the headlines last night, I think it is interesting that we are getting so many negative reports about what’s going on in Iran. The “missing” nuclear scienctist and these triggers being the most interesting. I believe we are being prepared for a strike on Iran by someone. If I had to guess, I think Israel will be the one who attacks. The Won should have been expressing support for the protesters.

Cindy Munford on December 14, 2009 at 2:34 PM

After the invasion of Iraq, Congress seemed very interested in the politicization of intelligence regarding Saddam Hussein’s WMD capabilities.

What do you cite as your evidence for this?

orange on December 14, 2009 at 3:48 PM

Lets remember this in ’10 or ’12,when conservatives gain the upper hand,to press congress to investigate those behind that NIE report.And also a full scale investigation into who,in the CIA and the State Dept,was leaking classified info that helped no one,but certain media,and our enemies(there i go being redundant again).They need to fry.

theTarCzar on December 14, 2009 at 5:47 PM