Video: Palin gets revenge on master thespian William Shatner
posted at 9:33 pm on December 11, 2009 by Allahpundit
Yeah, he’s pals with Rush. But even so — he had it coming.
Somewhere Chris Matthews is watching this and thinking, in all seriousness, “She can read.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 Next »
Yes, look at the way they hide their true nature. Showing a false face to the world, too frightened to reveal who they really are. I blame society.
Jim Treacher on December 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM
Watch it again…
It gets better every time!
Seven Percent Solution on December 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM
You’re spinning your wheels here, podnah.
It’s sooooooooooo obvious that Sarah is a winner!
Jenfidel on December 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Vox, you are posting here fraudulently. OK to be an Australian, not OK to pretend you are not.
csThor on December 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM
William Shatner stalking elephant in his underwear: That’s gonna to bring on nightmares.
mizflame98 on December 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM
Yeah that’s not creepy or anything. I imagine you’re a real hit with the ladies. LOL
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 8:40 PM
Vox is on the scroll past list, he’s not legit.
csThor on December 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM
I can’t even agree with you now? You’re certainly being a prickly pear.
Jim Treacher on December 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM
I can’t even agree with you now? You’re certainly being a grouch.
Jim Treacher on December 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM
First thing out of your keyboard all night that wasn’t unintelligible babble. If it reduces screen clutter, then please, by all means, scroll on by me, csThor.
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 8:45 PM
This guy who tried to rap, do heavy metal, and then, tried to revive his career doing country music. I think he works behind the counter in a 7/11 in Cairo, Illinois now.
kingsjester on December 12, 2009 at 12:27 PM
“I think ”
Prove it!
DSchoen on December 12, 2009 at 8:49 PM
Voxpopuli, are you also the same Voxpopuli that posts continually on Gawker?
csThor on December 12, 2009 at 8:52 PM
Seven minutes? You couldn’t go seven minutes?!? ROTFLOL
(And by the way — you read Gawker? GAWKER?!? (“Continuously”?!?) That explains a lot. What are you, a 12-year-old girl or something? LOL Clown.)
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 9:00 PM
Quitter/Gawker 2012
aaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 9:02 PM
William Shatner stalking elephant in his underwear: That’s gonna to bring on nightmares.
mizflame98 on December 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM
mizflame98:I almost died laughing,with all those possibil
ities of nightmares,while hunting in one’s und
erwear!!:)
canopfor on December 12, 2009 at 9:02 PM
So, Vox, same Voxpopuli, eh? LOL.
BTW, there is a difference between searching and reading. Smart girl, not.
csThor on December 12, 2009 at 9:04 PM
Very good point. Nowhere near the “MeMeMeMeMeeeee” emphasis that stands out in photos of His Obamaness. :P Thanks for sharing the link.
You did notice that the ones she picked to share on her FB page did tend to have a good bit of Todd in them. Of course, considering the former First Dude’s gorgeous smiles as he fed his son and talked with the Wounded Warriors, her choice of photos was VERY understandable. ;)
Todd is hot, is great with kids, is hot, can fish, fly, hunt and race snowmachines, is hot and is not threatened by a strong woman. Did I mention that he’s hot???
She is one lucky, lucky woman!!
Was a very engaging, fun bit on Conan’s show.
Kirin on December 12, 2009 at 9:10 PM
Awwwww…it has to come and spam another Palin thread. You’ve got issues. So do the mods for allowing it. Creepy.
ddrintn on December 12, 2009 at 9:15 PM
Does Lox know about this?
lovingmyUSA on December 12, 2009 at 9:19 PM
I blame Bush.
russcote on December 12, 2009 at 9:23 PM
Another reason the libs can’t stand her–Todd is not a metrosexual…He is hot like Tim Mcgraw hot!!!!
lovingmyUSA on December 12, 2009 at 9:29 PM
Yup! Todd completely blows AWAY the standard liberal meme of the ‘Neanderthal Conservative Male’ who ‘wants to keep wimmin folk in their place.’ He’s a very manly man who also happens to be very comfortable taking care of his son and family, even when his wife ran the state government. :)
Kirin on December 12, 2009 at 9:56 PM
So why does Treacher make you wet yourself?
lovingmyUSA on December 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM
Yes, almost as if they’ve hired a marketing guru to create a persona that was nothing like their true selves, then selling that persona to the American people, like a tube of toothpaste or floor wax.
When I think of Chicago Jesus, I think of the song, Pretenter by the foos. So fitting.
WordsMatter on December 12, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Watching it over–you can see Shatner looking at her when she walks out and sits down and and you can feel him thinking, “SHE is so HOT!”
lovingmyUSA on December 12, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Anyone planning on going to to the new smurf movie by james cameron?
unseen on December 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM
I don’t understand why the human fall in love with the animal and then fights his own country. And I really don’t want to know, so I will not be spending my money to line their pockets.
bloggless on December 12, 2009 at 10:39 PM
bloggless on December 12, 2009 at 10:39 PM
I’m pretty much tired of being lectured too by hollywood lefties on how evil my country is. They destroyed star wars with their political crap, they screwed up GI JOE and even raped Indy. I find myself watching old John wayne westerns more and more. why would anyone want to watch young smurfs rail against the “evil USA capitalist system.”
Bring me a Braveheart any day However, thanks but no thanks for the Smurfs fight for their right to party
unseen on December 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM
LOL The class of a Quitter Fan.
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 11:36 PM
LOL The class of a Quitter Fan.
voxpopuli on December 12, 2009 at 11:36 PM
Stop talking about the Presidnet and the sec of state like that. sure they quit their position and left their voters in a pinch but at least they moved up in pay and power.
Just think they could have been like Palin and quit and then make only $7million in three weeks selling books and become the defacto head of the conservative movement in the USA. \
unseen on December 12, 2009 at 11:39 PM
I love her.
She gives me political wood.
justltl on December 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM
“There’s a toupee.. on the.. wing…”
Akzed on December 12, 2009 at 11:45 PM
WOW……SHE’S HUMAN!!!!!
The reaction of some moderates and Reagan Democrats who only get their news about D.C. from the bacteria infested 2 minute snippets on NBC/CBS/ABC Nightly news or GMA/Today show/ and whatever the current version is on CBS.
No worries Obama…..keep getting those awards and statues in your honor. Keep having those $100 a pound steak dinners, Michelle don’t mess with $500 sneakers…go for the $5,000 hi-tops!! Nancy P spend some more money on Flowers and junkets. Reid, do some more double dealing in Nevada…………and PAAAAALEEESE GOP “insiders” keep talking trash on that Wasilla Hillbilly.
We’re coming to take our Country back. :-)
PappyD61 on December 12, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Don’t pay any attention to Vox. Previously known as “Poptech”; he has already been banned once on HotAir. Just a matter of time before he is again.
Norwegian on December 12, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Sapwolf finishes a great Day 1 at Front Sight, putting two shots at a time into the thoracic cavity of targets with his reliable Springfield XD .45, the Cuda is AWESOME on Conan, and the trolls continue the PDS meltdown.
It don’t get much better than that.
Carry on.
Sapwolf on December 13, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Can the people who run this site kindly delete the poor troll Vox?
Come on? Quality Check?
Sapwolf on December 13, 2009 at 12:13 AM
Conan is going to want the governor back on his show. Glad she agreed to do it!
NebCon on December 13, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Fix’d
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 1:34 AM
LOL Tupperware.
OH I’M SORRY I mean ‘Mods will you please ban Sapwolf b/c he is not a Palinbot and look he highjacked the thread.’ LOL
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM
I second that motion. At least HotAir should limit their trolls to adults only.
atheling on December 13, 2009 at 2:03 AM
Ouch, I see I got too close for comfort–truth hurts, huh. Now go on with your man-crush on Treacher…
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 2:36 AM
All libs wet dream–to be classless!
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 2:37 AM
Palin is gorgeous and she has a tigress like manner…..
a potent mix….. with brains and good core beliefs to boot.
She seems to just silence her opponents when she is right in
front of them in person.
dec5 on December 13, 2009 at 3:14 AM
As an aside, did you know Anita Dunn was from Alaska? She’s part of the Alaska Mafia that has attacked Sarah, along with Obama’s campaign chief-of-staff, now WH adviser, Pete Rouse. Rouse has been an insider in DC for 30 plus years, and only very briefly lived in Alaska, but STILL votes absentee there.
Anyhow, Anita may be leaving, but her husband is taking a top job in the WH. By the way, his law firm, Perkins-Coie has also been involved with smearing Sarah, big time. They are Obama’s personal attorneys and represent him in all of the challenges to his eligibility.
Van Jones just took a job with Podesta, so absolutely nothing changed there. The only way to be rid of these people is to be rid of Obama.
You know, Thomas Jefferson advocated having a revolution every 20 years. Thought it a good thing. We’re only 213 years overdue. I think it may be time to listen to Jefferson!
gary4205 on December 13, 2009 at 3:37 AM
Actually we’re Palin fans.
If you know anything about her, first and foremost is that she’s not a quitter.
powerpro on December 13, 2009 at 7:01 AM
Good Lord! The Palin worship is reaching the same levels as the Obama worship the Paliniacs despise.
Psst she quit the governorship – her only true claim to executive experience. If she decides to run in 2012 she can’t claim more exec experience than Obama. Had she stuck it out as gov she could have made that claim.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:13 AM
And you would’ve found something else to complain about.
Jim Treacher on December 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM
You even admire her primary motive for quitting…
Defacto head… sez who?
Besides she said she is not running for office but was going to help Americans or some such pap. Looks like she helped herself plenty but I’m not seeing where a self promoting book tour does much to help Americans.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM
In Paliniac land legitimate criticism = hating lefties. Good example – what I stated is a statement of fact, not a complaint, but like the Palinbots you deflect and distort anything in order to to lift her up.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Good Lord! The Palin worship is reaching the same levels as the Obama worship the Paliniacs despise.
If you know anything about her, first and foremost is that she’s not a quitter.
powerpro on December 13, 2009 at 7:01 AM
Psst she quit the governorship – her only true claim to executive experience. If she decides to run in 2012 she can’t claim more exec experience than Obama. Had she stuck it out as gov she could have made that claim.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:13 AM
By her terms of mayor she can still claim more exec experience than Obama. facts are hard things for Palin haters I know. And since when did RESIGNING become quitting. The correct term for giving up a political position is resigning. You know like Hillary, Obama huntsman, and Sebelius among others resigned (quit) their elected positons to further their careers.
It is amazing that people use the term “quit”. Not like they are trying to shape the people’s thought process about the sitution or anything. Can you be more transperant?
I know the Palin love scares you. If only we would love Mitt or Obama all the world’s problems would disappear. If Mitt wants to be loved maybe he should lead and fight the good fight against the forces of statism inside of being a lackey of the statists.
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 8:28 AM
You even admire her primary motive for quitting…
Defacto head… sez who?
Besides she said she is not running for office but was going to help Americans or some such pap. Looks like she helped herself plenty but I’m not seeing where a self promoting book tour does much to help Americans.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM
Primary motive? No. Long shot. Since when did making lemonade from lemons become a problem. Her primary motive for resigning (as you well know and yet for some strange reason refuse to accept or acknowledge, hmm imagine that)her positon was to allow the state she loves to be freed from the daily leagal attaks on her and her people. When the dems went after her people and caused them to go into debt it was the final straw. She stepped down with a hand picked replacement that shared her agenda in place (unlike Obama and hillary that left their voters to the wolves of corrupt officals).
As soon as she was out of office she charged ahead in the work of stopping the statists in charge of the country. Giving sppeches, posting the conservative positions on facebook. Writing op-eds and writting her book. She took a negative and turned it into a +$7million positive, increasing her standing in conservative circles as well as national circles.
By her being the only high profile national GOP leader to engage and fight against Obama’s policies she has become the defacto leader. Mitt could have been if he had the balls to attack a popular president when that president went against his core principles. that is if he had any core principles. Mitt ball less and lacking principles. Hey that could be his campaign slogan.
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 8:39 AM
“That depends on what your definition of “is” is”. – Bill
Clinton
This is what it has come to for the Paliniacs.
No, actually it disgusts me that people behave like this about a politician.
Love means a lack of objectivity in regards to the object of one’s love – hence the Paliniacs are incapbable of being objective because they do love her.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Nope. I don’t worship her. But I know that I worship the same God she worships. Plus … she clearly makes her stands on issues and she’s leading the fight against Obamoaism. That’s the most important kind of leadership in the next 3 years.
She’s effectively conveying the message of the People against the Big and Fascist Government of Obama.
Other so-called leaders are lukewarm … not the very kind of leadership Americans need right now. Sarah Palin is offering true leadership … a passionate one if need be.
TheAlamos on December 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM
But she has not said she is running for President. Why?
What then does she really offer – the true leadership doesn’t wash. Good example of successful capitalism irt her book but that is it.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM
In Paliniac land legitimate criticism = hating lefties.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:20 AM
When you start having legitimate criticisms instead of old DNC attack talking points maybe we could have a discussion. However, as long as you presist in using debunked DNC smears about palin, a warped negative view of the woman, and vocabualry (like quitting instead of the correct term of resigning) to try to “frame” the debate in the most negative light then you will continue to be called on it.
P.S. you statement was not fact. You “forgot” about her time as mayor. Which in any textbook counts has executive experience. Again you place strawmans and ommissions to make you case yet for some reason you think you should be given a fair hearing? Amazing
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 8:45 AM
That depends on what your definition of “is” is”. – Bill
Clinton
This is what it has come to for the Paliniacs.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM
what? Has it come to this asking people to use the correct dictionary term for an observed action:
vacate: leave (a job, post, or position) voluntarily; “She vacated the position when she got pregnant”; “The chairman resigned when he was found …
leave office: give up or retire from a position; “The Secretary of the Navy will leave office next month”; “The chairman resigned over the financial scandal”
release: part with a possession or right; “I am relinquishing my bedroom to the long-term house guest”; “resign a claim to the throne”
accept as inevitable; “He resigned himself to his fate”
to be like Clinton. Since it is accepted usage to use the term resign when talking about a politican leaving office early. It is now Bill CLintionish to ask that the proper term be used in converstation. Ok there!
You refusal to use the proper term tells anyone that has ears to listen that you have an axe to grind and want to protray Palin’s action in the most negative light you can. Which by the way says about all anyone really wants to know about your close minded post.
You rail against the Palin love but show in your comments the exact opposite emotion of hate and yet you think you are being logical
As Rush says Words mean things.
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 9:20 AM
That would have been a failing strategy since he would have just finished 4 years in the highest executive office.
No, the argument should be on his judgment. Judge him by what he said to judge him by – just remind people in ads that he requested it and he’ll sink under his own actions.
Spirit of 1776 on December 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM
But she has not said she is running for President. Why?
What then does she really offer – the true leadership doesn’t wash. Good example of successful capitalism irt her book but that is it.
Bradky on December 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM
LOL Why? because it is not the time nor place to say she is running. It is accepted to wait until after the mid-terms to annouce intentions. As little has 8 years ago it was accepted to wait until after the 4th of july to declare.
Now you want her to announce not 6 months early or a year early but 2.5 years early. Yeah that would be real smart politics And no way that would be looked at negatively by the MSM as an egotistical/divivse move
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM
Nope. I don’t worship her. But I know that I worship the same God she worships. Plus … she clearly makes her stands on issues and she’s leading the fight against Obamoaism. That’s the most important kind of leadership in the next 3 years.
She’s effectively conveying the message of the People against the Big and Fascist Government of Obama.
Other so-called leaders are lukewarm … not the very kind of leadership Americans need right now. Sarah Palin is offering true leadership … a passionate one if need be.
TheAlamos on December 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM
agreed It is a shame people misplace respect and love for worship. If Palin came out tommorrow and said she was for increased spending and though Government was the answer for everything I would no longer support her. If she buckled under the statists attacks and become part of the problem like Mitt I would also no longer support her. etc.
It is fun to see that Bradky again uses a certain word to conote a negative image instead of others more readily available for the topic. respect/love now equals worship
resign now equals quit hate=intellctual honesty. etc etc
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM
No, the argument should be on his judgment. Judge him by what he said to judge him by – just remind people in ads that he requested it and he’ll sink under his own actions.
Spirit of 1776 on December 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM
agreed somewhat. I think you should not make the debate about persons but policy. Attack Obama on his tax and spend policies, his statist policies, his attempts to takeover the healthcare, his takeover of GM, AIG, banks etc. His desire to cap Co2 emmissions. You do not really want the campaign to devolve into a personility contest. If you do then the media will be able to frame the debate us vs them. By staying on the policy issues you do not give the MSM that arrow to launch as much and you have the ability to gain a mandate if the voters agree that your policies are better.
unseen on December 13, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Gov. Palin, is the real thing, and can take a joke as what it is not as what the media wants U.S. to think it is – a character flaw.
MSGTAS on December 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM
DSchoen on December 12, 2009 at 8:49 PM
I was kidding about Kid Rock. Lighten up, Francis. Trying to make him a country star made about as much sense as when they had Springsteen and Van Morrison put out country CDs.
kingsjester on December 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM
That was great. I love how the place went crazy when she walked out.
Geronimo on December 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM
No, actually I think it’s something about this particular woman getting any kind of adulation that turns your stomach. I don’t think you’d get quite as torn up over a sudden flurry of Mitt-love, for example. Certainly not torn up enough to wag a finger in every other post to scold the faithful about RomneyCare.
ddrintn on December 13, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Damn, get out of my head! You beat me to it! Bradky must have gotten up early to get his talking points…
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 11:41 AM
She apparently was the queen of the Gridiron ball, too. The media folks really liked her and Todd.
AnninCA on December 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Ah yes, the Concern Trolls. So “concerned” about the direction of the Conservative Movement. We don’t seem “wonky” enough.
Jesus. So damned transparent. It’s as if we just fell off the turnip truck or something.
victor82 on December 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Regarding the question or argument that Palinistas WORSHIP Sarah Palin I bring your attention to the case of Brett Favre of the Minnesota Vikings. Favre joined the Vikings and has taken the Vikings to a 10-2 record. Do the other 52 players on the Vikings WORSHIP Favre? No, but they do respect his talents immensely and what he brings to table, but do not, let me repeat do not consider Favre to be a deity. And neither do the Palinistas think Sarah Palin is a god even though millions of us would walk over broken glass for her.
technopeasant on December 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Real problems with that statement:
(1) “More” exec experience is not necessarily a primary applicable criteria . It is the quality/results of that experience – and whether the applicant surrounds himself/herself with quality people with experience where the applicant is short.
For instance,
(A)If we applied that criteria to the dreg in office
now – Our Country would be in a whole lot better shape.
(B)If the Dems had ran Jimmy Carter (who can serve
another 4 years) – and applied your criteria…….
(2) Even in 2012 – Palin will still have more exec experience than Obama – Since he hasn’t been (doing his job) executing the oath of his office – protecting and defending The Constitution of the United States.
And those he has surrounded himself with – the tax cheats, the socialists, the depraved and UN-Godly – his whole adult life, shows that whatever exec experience you think he may have by 2012 – will be
of no usea huge detriment to him – and our great Contry.Oopsdaisy on December 13, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Nonsensical. In 2012 NO potential GOP candidate can claim more executive experience than Obama. Unless of course you have some idea that G. H. W. Bush is going to run.
ddrintn on December 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM
In 2005 who’d a thunk someone so far out of the mainstream as Obama would win the Presidency just 3 years later? For goodness sake, he was just another Chicago politician then. Yeah, he fired up the base pretty good but what about all those moderates? Ummmm, excuse me…
-
It’s surely hard to see how Sarah’s 2012 chances are any worse at this point in time than were Obama’s in 2005.
-
Except that by 2012 the country truly will be hankering for some Hope and Change.
Metanis on December 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM
You’re kidding – right? – Any GOP person who has 4 years as Governor will have just as much exec experience.
And you forget the “fact” that Obama’s “experience” will be of no benefit to any of us (as is being proven every week). – It isn’t “time” – it is “quality.”
Oopsdaisy on December 13, 2009 at 3:26 PM
Won’t matter. If the criterion is “executive experience” and not much else, being the sitting president trumps everything else. Obama can say if nothing else he is the sitting President of the United States — which not even Superman Mitt can match.
ddrintn on December 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
ddrintn has a point. The incumbent always has the advantage in any contest.
atheling on December 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
A shame Obama didn’t come out at the end in Spock Ears and genuflect to both of Palin and Shatner in an “I’m Not Wor-thee!” prostration.
Since Barry bows so beautifully.
profitsbeard on December 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
“I’m a clueless tool who gets his news from SNL. And being the lib I am, I have to use fake quotes to make a point because….well, because I have no point!”
- voxpopuli
LOL…..
xblade on December 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
One more thing…she puts fear into her bashers like no other…..
dec5 on December 13, 2009 at 4:23 PM
I will go back to point #1 in my first post:
The reason I raised this point was that (all of a sudden) “Exec Experience” has become a criteria – when it was of NO importance for consideration of competence for the Democratic candidate (who had “0″ exec experience) in the 2008 election. However, it was a huge deal for the Republican VICE presidential candidate (who had been in 2 elected executive positions – One being a Governor. – Why are there 2 sets of standards?
Now, suddenly, the discussion has quickly turned to “Presidential” executive experience (wonder why?).
To that change – I will say – yes, of course it is nonsensical. Obama will have the Presidential experience to claim. The problem is – it is our experience that matters a whole lot more to me. And I’m hoping Obama’s experience is SEVERLY limited come January of 2011 (after the rout in Nov. 2010)- and his experience is terminated with the election of 2012 – for my Country’s sake (if it isn’t too late by then).
Oopsdaisy on December 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM
The thing is, it is her ideas that make the deal, not just her looks. The words and her actions actually makes her case. Her constant strong support for the military,her belief in more drilling of American oil by private industry. Her support for the private sector in medicine.
Add to that, her decision to keep her special needs child,
says volumes of how she sees the value of human life.
She isn’t perfect, all Palin supporters will say this. She
and her family obviously have problems with Johnston who
seems bent on destroying himself in public. But it is how
She and her family deals with the imperfections and make the
best of it, with faith in God, and with values that actually made this country great, that is the attraction….
dec5 on December 13, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Since I’m “late to the thread;” this point may have been made before.
In this video, Governor Palin shows us several things.
1. She has style, and grace.
2. She can be self-effacing, convincingly.
3. Without having to say it, she does answer the “can she even read?” fools.
4. She did it on Conan’s show (get it, Dave?)
5. Shatner was giving her the wolf’s-eye – she’s fine looking.
For those who go out of their way to hate on her, fine.
Don’t buy her book.
Don’t go to her appearances.
But, as she continues to trend upward in all measures of approval, and broaden her base, and claim the positions of true conservatives, just try and stay off the bandwagon!
massrighty on December 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM
I was refuting Bradky, not you really. “Executive experience” really didn’t factor much into the last election, and I don’t think it will be the dominant factor in 2012. Ideological difference will be. In 1980, Carter had the “executive experience” advantage over Reagan despite Reagan’s two terms as CA governor. People weren’t doing the arithmetic and comparisons of that sort in their minds, though. They preferred Reagan’s ideology to Carter’s.
ddrintn on December 13, 2009 at 6:09 PM
I think that if presidential experience factors in the next election–it will be to show what a lack of executive experience causes…Obama needs to be hammered on his “smart power” concept, and his failed diplomacy.
BAnyway, by the time of the 2012 elections–Israel may have already attacked Iran, and that will doom Obama…
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 6:43 PM
*BRRRRRING BRRRRRRING BRRRRRING*
Oh it’s reality calling. It’s for you.
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Understood – And I agree with you. I was going to bring up Ford, Carter and Bush 1 in the previous post concerning Exec experience” – But it was getting too long.
Thanks for paying attention!
Oopsdaisy on December 13, 2009 at 6:46 PM
Says the one who lives in fantasyland! Doesn’t your unicorn need feeding?
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 6:49 PM
LOL Wut? Her walking out of office was just a hoax? It’s a conspiracy! Someone call M. Bachmann!
LOL Wut? Perhaps you should learn the correct meaning of “correct.”
Or perhaps you mean the conservative version of political correctness. I notice a lot of Palinbots going down that road. It’s quaint.
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 6:52 PM
Shhhhhhhh. Men are talking.
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM
Oh goody. Now there’s a nationally-inspiring figure for our times.
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 6:55 PM
…and no one can claim more then Biden, or Pelosi…it is the quality of experience, and if it is one where the experience provides us with record unemployment, record deficits, record scandals, as this has obtained, I don’t think it is one to be proud of…
right2bright on December 13, 2009 at 7:01 PM
So that explains why you are feeling left out…
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Can Hot Air use some quality control and rid us of the adolescent trolls here?
atheling on December 13, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Rachel Maddow called~she wants her finger back….
HornetSting on December 13, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Fix’d
voxpopuli on December 13, 2009 at 7:32 PM
You got spayed? Thank goodness.
HornetSting on December 13, 2009 at 7:37 PM
I have to admit – he is childish, boorish, discourteous, impolite, rude, self-centered, thoughtless, and unthinking. Along with that – A nincompoop, blockhead, dolt, dunce, jackass, nitwit, numb skull and simpleton.
But I do not think we should silence someone – unless he steps over the lines set down by management.
The best way to handle someone who insists that he has a “right” to be a jerk as much as he can – and just has to prove it – is to not address anything he says. If you do – it gives him significance in his own little mind – and encourages more idiotic kiddie stuff from him.
Let him post – and post and post – and get no acknowledgment responses. That will hurt his little ego and he’ll eventually get tired of having no effect on the adults – and will petulantly go away.
If he is over 14 – he already has a veritable plethora of mental problems – and is much better off over at Daily Koz or Huffington Post amongst his own kind.
BTW, voxpopuli, I anticipate your blubbering drivel of a response – to make mine and everyone’s point about you.
Just be aware (before you start) that I DON”T CARE what you have to say about me – You might not be able to grasp that in your state of mind – but you are really irrelevant – except for the way you are upsetting some of the good people here.
Now, on with your hate response and get it over with – I have washed my hands of you.
P.S. – I forgot to say LOL. – Now go back and sit in the corner.
Oopsdaisy on December 13, 2009 at 7:50 PM
I’d advise baking soda for that sting!
lovingmyUSA on December 13, 2009 at 8:01 PM
“Fix’d” my ass. You don’t debate. You don’t post anything of any substance. You don’t comment. You don’t even post coherent sentences.
All you do is post immature, juvenile garbage. You come here and insult people. You’re the biggest ass wipe on this thread, and I’m making it a mission to get you banned, jackass.
atheling on December 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 Next »