Canadian green: Hey, let’s fight climate change by limiting everyone in the world to one child

posted at 2:21 pm on December 11, 2009 by Allahpundit

Consider this “progress.” For whatever reason, possibly the vogue generated by the Goracle’s Nobel win, a bunch of green commentary in this vein popped onto our radar in mid- to late 2007. First came a think tank urging Brits to go green by having fewer children, even though their population’s already below replacement rate; then came that notorious “abort your way to a healthier planet” op-ed that kicked up a fuss in the ‘sphere; and finally a call for a tax on reproduction by an Aussie environmentalist, coincidentally on the very day that Gore delivered his Nobel speech. (A few months later, Ted Turner rounded off the meme by insisting that we might eventually resort to a tastier form of population control.)

Those ideas were all aimed at incentivizing childlessness, either through tax breaks or appeals to conscience, but ultimately left the choice of whether to have kids to the individual. Not this new one, though. It seems we’ve now reached the point of explicit, balls-out admiration for Chinese-style compulsory population control and all the social niceties it entails. And not for the first time lately, either. Remember this hyper-creepy Tom Friedman ode to the one-party ChiCom system in September?

It’s come to this:

Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world’s leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict…

China has proven that birth restriction is smart policy. Its middle class grows, all its citizens have housing, health care, education and food, and the one out of five human beings who live there are not overpopulating the planet.

For those who balk at the notion that governments should control family sizes, just wait until the growing human population turns twice as much pastureland into desert as is now the case, or when the Amazon is gone, the elephants disappear for good and wars erupt over water, scarce resources and spatial needs.

China itself has already used this argument, in fact, to claim that it’s “doing its part” to fight global warming. Two points, then. First, does the author realize that, with a few exceptions (like the U.S.), it ain’t first-world countries that are driving the population boom? The birth rates in Europe and Japan are already helping to depopulate the planet; if she wants to make a dent in global crowding, talk to the third world. And second, what’s alarming about pieces like this isn’t that they’re close to being implemented politically but that the basic idea — fascism in the name of environmentalism — is respectable enough to warrant publication even in outlets like the Financial Post and the NYT. If you think the illuminati at Copenhagen are wagering an awful lot on the science being settled, imagine how heavy a bet idiots like this are willing to lay. Thank goodness there’s no one in power in America who’s ever entertained similar ideas.

Your reading here will not be complete until you see the punchline from Jim Geraghty. Exit question: Would compulsory population control also involve some sort of cap-and-trade system, with anomic urbanites like myself able to barter away our reproductive “quota” to couples who want more than one?

Update: No post on green scaremongering would be complete without the video that opened Copenhagen. Via MKH, don’t watch this with the lights off.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Dark-Star on December 12, 2009 at 11:09 PM

You obviously don’t know any cops or any people in the military.

I’ve spent 20 years in the military. The people I know wouldn’t stand for this for a second, neither would any of the cops I know.

They can pass any law they like. They can’t get laws enforced if the people they think will enforce it, would be part of a violent uprising against the government.

Which is why it will never pass.

NoDonkey on December 13, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Sick and evil. These worms are in for a rude awakening if they think we will sacrifice our families – born or unborn – on the alter of Gaia.

bitsy on December 13, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Video – Hockey Stick over Time

Al Gores hockey stick is broken… not that he ever had one.

What he and all the other climate fear mongers are doing is approaching criminal intent.

Yakko77 on December 13, 2009 at 7:01 PM

Google now has climate change on Google Earth:
New! Explore impact of climate change on Google Earth

Yay…..

sheffrey on December 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Science writer Andrew C. Revkin, the individual journalist most identified with reporting on climate change, is leaving The New York Times.

J_Crater on December 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4