It’s official: no one learned anything from Fannie/Freddie collapse
posted at 11:36 am on December 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Here’s what should have been a familiar scenario. The federal government wants to pressure lenders into offering mortgages to marginally-qualified borrowers. They offer a method to make the loans risk-free by bundling them into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) with the imprimatur of the US Treasury as a guarantee. When the money began rolling into the lenders, the lenders started amplifying the process by issuing loans to anyone breathing on a fairly regular basis, falsifying documents in order to rake in the dough — since defaults would no longer be their problem.
Is this a good description of the CRA-based housing bubble that ran for almost a decade before catastrophically collapsing in 2008? Yes — but it’s also a description of the collapse in over a billion dollars’ worth of MBSs from a lender this week, thanks to the same geniuses that brought us the financial meltdown:
The trouble signs surrounding Lend America had been building for years. A top executive was convicted of mortgage fraud but still helped run the company. Home loans made by its headquarters were defaulting at an extremely high rate. Federal prosecutors alleged in a civil suit that the company falsified loan documents and committed fraud.
Yet despite these red flags, a little-known federal agency continued giving its blessing to Lend America, allowing it to do business in the name of the U.S. government. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as Ginnie Mae, authorized the firm to bundle its mortgages into securities and sell them to investors around the world — all backed by U.S. taxpayer money.
Until last week, federal housing officials said that Lend America met requirements for participating in the program run by Ginnie Mae, an agency in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and allowed the firm to sell more than $1 billion in mortgages via Ginnie Mae securities.
Lend America is hardly the only lender with a troubled record that Ginnie Mae has endorsed. The agency has provided taxpayer backing to at least 36 other mortgage companies with a history of reckless lending, fines or other sanctions by state and federal regulators or civil lawsuits, according to an analysis of government records, court documents and statistics in a HUD database.
Ginnie Mae’s ongoing relationship with these firms allows them to swap the home loans they’ve made for new cash so they can make more loans, which can then be traded for even more cash to make even more loans. Housing experts say this dynamic turbocharges the type of bad mortgage lending that first helped trigger the financial crisis that battered global markets over the past two years. And ultimately, taxpayers are on the hook for the troubled mortgages.
If anyone needed any evidence of the absolutely obtuse nature of statist interventionists, Ginnie Mae’s recreation of the housing crisis should provide it. At what point in this cycle should someone have said, “Hey, haven’t we done this before?” Was it when Ginnie Mae started guaranteeing MBSs for lenders, especially since there are around a trillion dollars’ worth of toxic MBSs still on the market? Was it when they started to pressure lenders into making marginal loans while foreclosure rates were already skyrocketing?
And now, watch out for the inevitable TARP program to rescue Ginnie Mae and its “guaranteed” MBSs, which will be used to bail out everything but its toxic assets. Barney Frank will harrumph that we’re not doing enough to help get people into housing, decrying the greed of the lenders, while enabling the greed and the excess of the next set by doing the same thing over again.
To paraphrase 300: This is madness — and it’s Washington DC.
Update: The Center for Public Integrity has a list of troubled lenders that Ginnie Mae has backed.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Is this the same “Lend America” that’s been running commercials with the babe in front of the White House talking about the new refinance/renegotiate your mortgage because of new Government help, with Obama’s picture also plastered all over it?
Or is that someone else?
Knucklehead on December 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM
/cry
WitchDoctor on December 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM
I’m a Realtor, and any talk of a housing recovery or the market ‘starting to turn’ makes me shake my head, because it’s simply wishful thinking. The entire market is a house of cards, and when those cards are Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie Mae, et al … it won’t end well. I’m very concerned with what we’ll see in 2010.
jonrademacher on December 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Name the people and to whom they are connected.
Skandia Recluse on December 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Can you say bananna republic….
SHARPTOOTH on December 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Is the dollar going to be worth more than a nickel in any country? Bye bye Europe. See Amerika!
Marcus on December 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM
“I am so smart, I am so smart, s-m-r-t…” – H. Simpson
rogerb on December 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Seems like everything is going according to plan for the communist democrats.
darwin on December 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
True liberals don’t learn. But sometimes conservatives start out thinking they were liberals.
hawksruleva on December 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM
As long as Fannie and Freddie gaurantee low downpayment, low interest loans we will continue to have this problem.
Get back to a reasonable down payment for everyone and a higher interest rate for people with low credit scores and the problem will go away.
jpmn on December 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Some people are meant to be renters. This is what happens when the government engineers “dreams” of home ownership.
Not everyone could or should buy a home.
The governments should stay out of the rainbow/dream maker business.
portlandon on December 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Barney Frank has his slobber and bodily fluids all over this…
Seven Percent Solution on December 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Can we just get rid of all companies that meet this criteria:
They back loans
They have 2 words in their name
The first word in their name ends in the letters ie
The second word in their name is either Mae or Mac
MobileVideoEngineer on December 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM
As a lender of 15+ years, I have been telling people about CRA for years to no avail. Everyone wants to blame the lenders when they should be looking at the government regulation of lenders. Noone in business is going to lend to someone with too much risk unless made too… period. I keep hearing more regulation, how about none and let the market drive lending by profit. Also, keep in mind that when no docs arrived , due to CRA lending quotas, you have to apply the same lending standards to everyone which is why they became so lax. You can’t lend to someone on a low or no doc and then on the next client not offer the same program if they fit the criteria.
momof2 on December 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM
omg *pulls my hair out*!!!!
becki51758 on December 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM
Does anyone know the where abouts of franklin raines?
SHARPTOOTH on December 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM
So:
1) These geniuses in Washington ignored all of the warnings that these lending practices were unsustainable.
2) The housing market, as predicted, imploded as a direct result
3) They want to do the same thing again
You’re right, Ed, this is the very definition of madness.
Meanwhile, I just keep on working and paying my mortgage on time like a complete idiot…..
UltimateBob on December 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Barney just likes rolling dice, after all, it ain’t his money.
GarandFan on December 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Barney Franks neither regions?
Aviator on December 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM
So, in fact, we are going to pay for houses, cars, and fuel. Somebody told us this before the election and we just did not believe them. I need a new cell phone…?
d1carter on December 10, 2009 at 11:58 AM
But, it’s only a billion. We don’t worry about billions, that is so 1980′s. /s
journeyintothewhirlwind on December 10, 2009 at 11:58 AM
This isn’t madness. We just haven’t tried enough yet. Do it again!!!
How about Timmy Mae?
Jimmy Mae?
Kimmy mae?
Ricky Mae?
We got a lot of names to get through before we’re done!
Thunderstorm129 on December 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM
If it makes you feel any better Bob, now you are helping pay other people’s mortgages too…
JusDreamin on December 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Didn’t learn anything?
That would presuppose that what they engaged in they thought to be wrong, either morally or economically.
If you do not understand the conclusion, question the premise.
Cloward/Piven explains what we see before us.
turfmann on December 10, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Gee, thanks. Yeah, I feel a whole lot better about that.
*** puts barrel of pistol into mouth and pulls trigger ****
UltimateBob on December 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM
You forgot
Sex To Me.
Yay, the criminals are in charge!
/getaclue
rbj on December 10, 2009 at 12:07 PM
KEEP VOTING DEMOCRAT ENEMIES OF AMERICA.
daesleeper on December 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM
This story never, ever got any play both now and last fall. I quit my local newspaper over it. I can’t sell my house because of it. I have relatives who can’t sell their houses because of it. If someone besides Conservatives would write this story, name names, and do some research and keep chipping away at it then maybe more people would understand that this was not particularly Bush’s fault and it was a giant failure of government. Way too many people have been caught with their hands in the National Cookie Jar and nothing is happening except they are doubling down and scooping with both hands.
BetseyRoss on December 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM
I think too many people have learned that over spending is quite acceptable and instead of being ashamed of spending more than you can afford, the government set the example of no consequences to those actions.
fourdeucer on December 10, 2009 at 12:10 PM
and not only this, there was closed door meeting in Washington on the EPA “command & control” of CO2 emissions v. cap ‘n trade legislation.
someone said (was this on FNC?) that Duke Power walked out of the meeting saying “we support Cap ‘n Trade”.
they got bought off.
ordinarily a bribe irritates me. but we are insolvent–we can’t bribe people anymore. for any reason.
kelley in virginia on December 10, 2009 at 12:12 PM
The ruling class does not believe the government can ever overspend. That is the root of the problem.
zmdavid on December 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Since you seem to be in a good position to answer this question, what are the penalties for not meeting CRA quotas. Also, is CRA membership optional?
The Calibur on December 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Eventually our house of cards government overspending system will collapse and we’ll be a third world country. It comes faster with every dollar they spend on anything.
zmdavid on December 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM
One thing was learned. Money will be borrowed to bail you out if you are irresponsible.
Vashta.Nerada on December 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Well folks this is another nail in the coffin for the once great country called America!
xler8bmw on December 10, 2009 at 12:18 PM
We got a lot of names to get through before we’re done!
Thunderstorm129 on December 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Pookie Mae
txag92 on December 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Kelley, is that what I think it is, a power company?
If so, I don’t think they got bought off. This is the problem with Cass Sunstein being the regulatory czar. He believes you can accomplish things you can’t legislate by strict regulations.
If a power company comes out of an EPA meeting with a radically different position, the CO2 regulations they’re facing must be so heinous that cap and trade looks like a good option.
We the people need to be on top of this, and be prepared to sue the EPA under the Administrative Proceedure Act.
It is the law that essentially prohibits the government from making arbitrary and capricious decisions, and may be just about the only option if the EPA is making severe regulations on CO2.
Marine_Bio on December 10, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Agreed. I would add that if anyone thinks the Obama administration is stupid or incompetent they’re looking at things from the wrong perspective.
Remember, these are Marxist ideologues-communists-with an unabashed hatred of Western civilization, especially America.
Judge everything they do from that premise and it all makes perfect sense.
single stack on December 10, 2009 at 12:26 PM
OOPS!
ProceedureProcedureThe downside of typing while being irritated.
Marine_Bio on December 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Why not? It worked so well the 1st time.
Kissmygrits on December 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Destroying prosperity on purpose makes them bigger idiots than doing it by accident.
zmdavid on December 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Next year there are going to be a lot of mortgage rates resetting, higher, plus there is going to be a meltdown in ‘commercial’ real estate the likes of which we haven’t seen.
Yes, 2010 is going to be a banner year of the real estate meltdown part deux.
belad on December 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Cloward-Piven house party.
Kenosha Kid on December 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Reason 615 why you would be crazy to buy real estate right now. There will be millions more people foreclosing in the next 1-3 years
angryed on December 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Exactly. The EPA CO2 regulation is a gun to our head to accept Cap and Trade as the lesser of two evils.
Aviator on December 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM
CRA isn’t an association. It’s the Community Reinvestment Act first signed into law by Jimmy Carter in 1977. In practice it requires mortgage lenders to loan money to minorities whether they can repay or not. Failing to meet quotas can result in the lender facing severe sanctions for “racism”.
http://www.answers.com/topic/community-reinvestment-act
single stack on December 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Hey, I know — let’s let THESE guys run healthcare!
RegularJoe on December 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM
No, it makes them evil.
single stack on December 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM
No; it makes them EVIL.
RegularJoe on December 10, 2009 at 12:41 PM
D’oh!
cmsinaz on December 10, 2009 at 12:41 PM
HUH? You can’t sell your house because your are asking more than it is worth. Lower your price to the market value and you’ll sell it ASAP.
I’m so sick of people saying I can’t sell my house. What you really mean to say is I can’t sell my house for a wish price than I think I deserve to get because I overpaid for my house and I expect someone else to overpay as well. Doesn’t work like that.
I see this thinking with cars all the time. KBB value is $15K, joker is asking $20K. I offer $15K he says, “oh no I can’t sell it for that, I’ll lose money”. Well guess what, that’s what happens when you overpay for an asset and then the market value for the asst collapses…you lose money.
angryed on December 10, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Mind meld.
Marine_Bio on December 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM
CRA applies to all federally-regulated banks. The bank regulators examine all banks every year and give them a CRA rating, from “Outstanding” to “Unsatisfactory.” There are no “penalties” per se for an Unsatisfactory rating, but the regulator can use it as leverage to deny a bank’s request for expansion or acquisition of another bank or business. The worst part of it is that the consumer activist groups like ACORN will bludgeon any bank that gets an Unsatisfactory rating in the press and in the communities where the bank operates, so nobody wants to get an Unsatisfactory.
rockmom on December 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM
I watched Geithner testify tot hew TARP Overisght Panel today
he claims to want TARP extended for housing and small business
when Elizabeth Warren, chair, questioned why Treasury has announced 3 small business programs and not funded any of those and is asking for more TARP funding for the same stated purpose he whined about hwo the small banks are afriad to take the money due to possibly changing conditions attached
no duh!
and he proclaimed the success of HAMP in which 640,000 trial mods are 64% and up without supporting documentation
either Treasury will force the servicers to approve permament mods with no docs (hello no doc loans round Deux, Duh!) or these people will be dumped BACK into foreclosure bringing the market back down as the unemployed contonue to rise…
shouldve done the HOLC in Feb 08 when HRC proposed it
we OWN all these loans ANYWAY via fan fred fha we WILL be doing massive bailouts of those three GSEs…
ginaswo on December 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Not true in all markets. Some markets are so dead that no houses are selling at any price. I couldn’t sell my house right now because it needs a lot of work and there are a ton of better-condition houses on the market where I live, and people looking for houses like mine don’t want to have to replace a kitchen and a bathroom and windows and landscaping. Oh, I suppose I could sell it for a song to a house-flipper and end up owing my mortgage company money, but why would I do that?
rockmom on December 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM
PS HUGE News in that hearing
Sheila Biar of FDIC as Andrew Ross Sorkin of the NYT reported OBJECTED to allowing BofA to repay TARP and I am SURE she is trying to block CITI
Geithner said he could not reveal those discussions, which is not a NO
so Treasury forced the payback to have good data and the banks are not secure
this sucketh
ginaswo on December 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM
2:30pm the Treasury HAMP Status report comes out…
ginaswo on December 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Ginnie Mae has been around a long time and was supposed to create a secondary market for FHA-insured loans. The original idea was that Ginnie would issue its own securities backed by FHA loans. It was never designed or staffed effectively to become a guarantor of private-label MBS. This article just blew me away.
rockmom on December 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM
FRONT PAGE WSJ today
the second American ‘Dream’ doing jingle mail, leaving your underwater house and renting a nicer one down the street….
anecdotally unlike the people mentioned in the WSJ piece, unemployed folks in AZ get a MAX of 265 a week, so under HAMP servicer guidelines even though unemployed are eligible for mods, their income is so low NO ONE in AZ will qualify
AZ CA NV FL are 21% of our national GDP
ginaswo on December 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Sheila Bair is an empire-builder. She wanted to have the big banks under her thumb for a while longer. She got asll kinds of new power under TARP and doesn’t want to let go of it. I actually trust the Treasury on this one, if B of A and Citi have the capital to pay back the TARP loans and maintain their required regulatory capital, there is no reason to stop them.
rockmom on December 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Question: if a house of cards falls in the forest–does anybody hear?
lovingmyUSA on December 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Excellent post, Mr. Morrisey. At the risk of sounding patronizing, your material has really improved of late, showing a much better grasp of the principles involved and focusing less on the pure monetary effects.
Bravo, and thank you.
JDPerren on December 10, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Somebody better do a comprehensive tabulation of the bad loans created by “predatory lenders” and “deregulation” against the CRA. The media, including WaPo, are serving up every culprit except liberal democrats.
And the extra layer of blame is designed to hoodwink the people who are well informed enough to get past the meme that ‘it is all Bush’s fault, anyway’.
IlikedAUH2O on December 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM
I have the perfect solution for all of this.
Problem is, I’d prob’ly get banned from posting, and put on a gov’t watch list.
Grrrrrr
franksalterego on December 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM
The EPA is currently drafting a program to act as a substitute to cap and trade. It will be called EPA Directive 10-289a. It should get Exxon on board with cap and trade, too.
iurockhead on December 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM
Socialized Mortgages again? What could possibly go wrong?
We’ve got Socialized Weather, Socialized Cars, with Maj. Hasan, we’ve even got Socialized Terrorism.
Maybe they should just pass one law: Everthing is Free. And then disband Congress and go home. If someone’s not already living in it.
Noel on December 10, 2009 at 1:20 PM
This is my opinion, but the current jump in housing sales is only temporary and after April 30, 2010 when the tax credit is not longer available, housing stock will once again slow down to a crawl. Not everyone’s cut out to be a homeowner, but the government continues to tell families they must own a house.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac directors need to get out and talk to real estate agents, closing agents, appraisers, and loan officers in the real world and not the chosen few who are telling the government what they want to hear.
yoda on December 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Actually that is not what I meant. I wrote the checks on everything that was used to build my house. I know how much it is worth. My relatives have owned their homes for many years so they are not “under water”. However, no one is buying anything. We have lost so much freedom since last fall. If you have to move or sell your house because of a job loss, no one is out there buying because we have lost our freedom and the means to earn a living. We are not able to do what we need to do in order to survive. This is deeper than having to knock off $100,000 off your asking price. We are all totally screwed because Barney Frank et al. think that poor people should be able to have a house that we are all paying for. Then for the cherry on top they constructed a means to enrich themselves. Our loss of freedom did not need to happen. We let it happen by changing the parameters of the argument and blaming the victims and not the perpetrators. This nonsense is unsustainable.
BetseyRoss on December 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM
The housing market will not recover until the following things happen:
1. The Federal government stops backstopping mortgages and interfering in the market.
2. The banks who made the bad loans are forced to foreclose on distressed properties, and if they are rendered insolvent by such, to be seized by the FDIC.
3. Banks return to sound lending practices, meaning at least 20% down and less than 35% debt-to-income.
4. Home prices are allowed to collapse to a point where anyone who has sufficient cash on hand can capitalize and purchase homes at low loan-to-value, or even free and clear.
Mortgages are only necessary because of the meddling in the housing market by state and federal governments, from home building all the way up to lending regulations and confiscatory tax rates on consumers. Free up the market and watch housing collapse (as it desperately needs to), then skyrocket when the natural pricing balance has been achieved.
TheMightyMonarch on December 10, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Angry Ed– Take your self-esteemed analysis and go sell it to the devil. Not all of the people mired in a dead mortgage can sell for “what it’s worth.” Leave the preaching to someone else, douche.
leftnomore on December 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM
But I’m not certain which it is in this particular case. I guess part of me finds it unbelievable that anyone could be evil enough to be doing this on purpose.
Al in St. Lou on December 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM
We live in a world that includes in its history industrialized assembly line murder (the Nazis), bloody slaughter on an epic scale (Pol Pot and Idi Amin) and the intentional starvation of entire populations of millions (Stalin and Mao).
Yes, there definitely are people evil enough to destroy our society on purpose.
single stack on December 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM
Without properly assigning interest rates, this can never work. No government program can make a borrower more worthy of a loan.
This is why NO government program can EVER fix the mortgage problem. Only a return to honest lending principals can!
Freddy on December 10, 2009 at 3:21 PM
When punishment becomes exclusively a public function, men seem to lose much of their fear of punishment.
Kralizec on December 10, 2009 at 5:32 PM
becki51758 on December 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM
You still have hair?!?
stacy on December 10, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae…
Am I detecting generational welfare/poverty here or not?
BKennedy on December 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM
I am 70 years old. In my life I never met a democrat who wasn’t immoral. Such a person has never existed.
proconstitution on December 10, 2009 at 10:20 PM