Quotes of the day
posted at 10:30 pm on December 9, 2009 by Allahpundit
“The response to my op-ed by global warming alarmists has been interesting. Former Vice President Al Gore has called me a ‘denier’ and informs us that climate change is ‘a principle in physics. It’s like gravity. It exists.’
“Perhaps he’s right. Climate change is like gravity – a naturally occurring phenomenon that existed long before, and will exist long after, any governmental attempts to affect it.
“However, he’s wrong in calling me a ‘denier.’ As I noted in my op-ed above and in my original Facebook post on Climategate, I have never denied the existence of climate change. I just don’t think we can primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes.
“Former Vice President Gore also claimed today that the scientific community has worked on this issue for 20 years, and therefore it is settled science. Well, the Climategate scandal involves the leading experts in this field, and if Climategate is proof of the larger method used over the past 20 years, then Vice President Gore seriously needs to consider that their findings are flawed, falsified, or inconclusive.
“Vice President Gore, the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that it’s sort of like gravity: you simply can’t deny it.”
***
“‘They’ve got us outnumbered,’ said Ian Plimer, an Australian geologist, who has interests in several mining operations. ‘But we’ve got them outgunned.’”
***
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
Smackdown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now you clearly see AP that Sarah Palin will never be a tool of Al Gore.
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 12:51 AM
Just a question here abou the book signing: Are you guys having to wait outside for all that time (many hours)?
My furnace was acting up for the past 2 days and holy crap it was so cold in my house.
You guys are waiting in the freezing cold to get her attention for 10 secs??
My hats off to you.
B Man on December 10, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Al Gore combines the worst traits of Charles “Piltdown Man” Dawson and Bernie “Swindler” Madoff.
MB4 on December 10, 2009 at 12:54 AM
If the oceans rise, it will be that much easier to drive congress into the sea.
jhffmn on December 10, 2009 at 12:55 AM
The church says the earth is flat, but I know that it is round, for I have seen the shadow on the moon, and I have more faith in a shadow than in the church.
- Ferdinand Magellan
If Ferdinand Magellan was alive today he would probably say “The Church of Global Warming says the earth is dangerously heating up, but I know that it is not, for I have seen the snow and ice and have felt their bitter cold, and I have more faith in snow and ice than in the Church of Global Warming, and it’s High Priests.”
MB4 on December 10, 2009 at 12:55 AM
Global warming is regarded by the sheeple as true, by those who can think for themselves as false and by the power mad and money grubbers as … … useful.
- Seneca the Younger paraphrased
What would be the effect of this Global Warming fraud and coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth. Al Gore and the Global Warming fraudsters and fanatics converted simple changes in the weather into an engine for enslaving mankind to filch wealth and power to themselves. They, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Scientists.
- Thomas Jefferson paraphrased
MB4 on December 10, 2009 at 12:56 AM
Enjoyed reading Sarah’s Dr Roger Flemming moment…
I’m a scientist. I don’t believe in anything.
disillusioned on December 10, 2009 at 12:59 AM
I’m incredibly encouraged by what I’m seeing.
I wouldn’t be surprised if grassroots skeptics begin organizing massive protests. People are really tired of getting this crud being pushed on them and are ready to exert some energy fighting it!
blink on December 10, 2009 at 1:00 AM
Ann, I’m not going to label you as anything – but how can you not be concerned over the most prominent scientists pushing global warming have fudged their data to make it fit their hypothesis?
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009
—————————————————-
Because she is a liberal and claiming she is not.
Liberals hate facts.
ms on December 10, 2009 at 1:02 AM
Not at Reno. Stood outside maybe 45 minutes. They had propane heaters spaced every few feet – but they didn’t help much unless you right there.
It wasn’t too bad if you are dressed for it. It was probably another 75 minutes before I got my book signed.
One weird thing – you buy the book – then you surrender it and the book you get back might not even be the same book you bought. No big deal really, unless you get a book someone else mangled (although I think they’d replace it if you asked).
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:04 AM
Please Sarah – don’t stop smacking the idiots!
To algore – the beatings will stop when your attitude improves.
platypus on December 10, 2009 at 1:04 AM
Not according to her. I’m also not a ‘RINO’ hunter for the sake of hunting ‘RINO’s’. Sometimes they can even be brought around to ‘right’ thinking.
There are only a few votes they make that I disagree with greatly. For the most part they are a tolerable lot to me – and I probably get called a RINO once in a while too (I’m a sometimes crazy mix of Con, Neo-Con and Libertarian).
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:06 AM
An insufferable ass is an insufferable ass, of course, of course,
And no one can talk sense to an insufferable ass of course
And especially, of course, if the insufferable ass is the infamous Albert Gore.
Go right to the source and ask the insufferable ass.
He’ll give you the answer that deceivers will endorse.
He’s always on a dissemblers course.
Talk to Albert Gore.
Albert Gore just yakkity yaks a heated Chicken Little streak and wastes your time of day
Does any sane person even believe anymore a thing he has to say?
An insufferable ass is an insufferable ass, of course, of course,
And this one’ll talk in delusional circles til his voice is hoarse.
You never heard of a talking insufferable ass?
Well listen to this.
He is Albert Gore.
Cheshire Cat on December 10, 2009 at 1:07 AM
It never seems to fail. Whenever I run into a young person that is planning their education in “environmental studies”, I always get excited and say:
“Cool!!! I love the hard sciences! This is where the solutions will be found! What are you going to focus on? Chemistry? Physics? Biology? Engineering?”
By the look on their face, you would think I just farted. And then, the inevitable answers…law, public administration, etc….
Saltysam on December 10, 2009 at 1:08 AM
An Inconvenient Truth, the zealots got caught cooking the books. They should have destroyed the e-mails with the original data. And, I thought that Nixon was stupid.
Johan Klaus on December 10, 2009 at 1:09 AM
I don’t think it is outside the realm of possibility that ethanol production methods could be enhanced to compete with oil. I also don’t think we can grow enough corn to replace oil – and that little fact wasn’t adequately addressed either.
I see no problem with continuing reasonable efforts on ethanol.
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Cheshire Cat on December 10, 2009 at 1:07 AM
Heh!
Saltysam on December 10, 2009 at 1:12 AM
SPANKED!
I have a feeling Mr freaky Gore likes a good spanking.
christene on December 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM
I was expecting a longer wait, but Reno is a much smaller city. I was also a little surprised that some weren’t aware she was even in town.
They also limited it to 1,000 people, although I think they might have let a few more in.
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:19 AM
+5
Laura in Maryland on December 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM
My daughter went to a Palin book signing. Got there at 5 pm and stayed over night with about 500 people to get her book signed at 11 am the next morning. The temperature reached a bone chilling 45 degrees by the morning. AZ is great this time of year. Global warming is good. Drive an SUV, save a javellina.
jbinnout on December 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM
Go Sarah. That was a pretty nice comeback. The last line was great.
JeffB. on December 10, 2009 at 1:22 AM
The Manbearpig won’t respond to Sarah. She slapped him and he knows it and he can’t possibly defend himself. If he says anything at all, he’ll look sillier than he already looks.
Mirimichi on December 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM
AnninCA on December 10, 2009 at 12:32 AM
I THINK THAT HER BUILDING UP HER BASE HAS PUSHED ME AWAY
What you are referring to is a variable or dynamic that affects the fortunes of viable, emerging politicians and their supporters, the originals and the newcomers.
Politicians, by inference, affirm positions and make decisions that they hope further their political hopes and aspirations. In so doing they first must summon up a political philosophy that they believe in or at least are extremely comfortable with espousing and then they must take that philosophy and use it as an instrument to shape it and transform it into a coherent, viable proposition and argument that attracts as many like-minded folks to your tent.
There are two ways to look at ‘the tent’. Either you are like Mike Huckabee, who today echoed the view the he preferred if ‘the tent’ were seen in more narrow terms and in his words ‘too big a tent will kill the conservative movement’. Call it the exclusivity argument.
Or you favor the more inclusive approach of Sarah Palin who doesn’t require that you sign ‘a purity oath’ to access her tent, that she puts stock in the wisdom of the voter who will come to a conclusion eventually whether his/her needs can be met through a Palin advocacy or candidacy. For example for Sarah Palin, if you are a liberal elite, you are probably never going to embrace her message, but if you believe in fiscal sanity, individual initiative and less government interference in your life although you are pro-choice you are certainly welcome and Sarah will make you feel better about your choice once it has been made. This may explain why so many independents are now moving in the Palin direction and not all of them are pro-life.
Now for Palin supporters, imagine if they were physically under one tent and you could break them down into four basic categories: 1) Christian and social conservatives who are pro-life; 2)fiscal conservatives; 3)national defense conservatives; 4)libertarians. And let’s say before Palin spoke these folks mingled and intermingled and began to exchange comments and enter into discussions in which they found that they were not always in agreement. Would many Palin supporters leave the tent because of their disagreement with some of Palin’s other supporters or would they stay because they determined it was more important to be in congruence with the message espoused by Sarah Palin than with the variety of supporters that Palin was able to attract into her tent.
AnninCA, I hope you reconsider you decision not to vote in 2010 and 2012. Please don’t let any other supporter of Sarah Palin convince you that your gravitation towards Sarah is not as worthy as ours. Our ‘conservative’ support of Sarah is not superior to your possible support for her, if that is what you decide to do. It is like when one visits the Grand Canyon. Some people want to just take pictures of the scenery and absorb its majesty, some want to examine firsthand the geological formations, some want to fly by helicopter to get a birds-eye view of what God crafted over several eons and some just want enjoy an outing with the family. To each his/her own.
technopeasant on December 10, 2009 at 1:28 AM
The main problem with ethanol is that it damages fuel systems. Eythanol is corrosive and absorbs water. It also has less energy than gasolene so it is not as fuel efficient. Also, using a food source for fuel is not the best solution.
Johan Klaus on December 10, 2009 at 1:30 AM
WWWAAAAYYYY too many words and too many BIG words for AnninCA. Besides, didn’t you hear – she’s leaving us.
Sporty1946 on December 10, 2009 at 1:35 AM
Sarah-1000 gore-0000
IowaWoman on December 10, 2009 at 1:37 AM
It also burns hotter and can damage seals in your engine if your vehicle is not equipped to handle ethanol.
I agree there are some issues with ethanol but many of them can be easily resolved. You don’t need to use corn, there has been some good results from certain grasses as well.
It has a way to go for sure but I’m not at all opposed to a 90/10 blend or whatever we can reasonable attain without the cost skyrocketing or our vehicles being damaged (or our food running out).
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:42 AM
Meh, she’s not relevant anymore, as she’s only an ex-governor of a iced-bound state!!elventy!1!11
Intrepid on December 10, 2009 at 1:48 AM
Seriously, Pundon’t. If you don’t understand Sarah’s comment about climate change not solely being the by product of capitalism, then you are not as politically savvy as you have your peers believe. Think about it.
long_cat on December 10, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Fav quote from her book so far:
“I eat meat. I eat pork chops, thick bacon burgers, and the seared fatty edges of of a medium well done steak. But I especially love moose and caribou. I always remind people from outside our state that there’s plenty of room for all Alaska’s animals…..right next to the mashed potatoes“.
Mr Purple on December 10, 2009 at 1:50 AM
I did read about the global problem of ethanol. US farmers are growing the new cash crop (propped up by the govt) corn for ethanol production. China is the number one importer of soy beans. The US used to supply much of that valued commodity to the hungry Chinese. But no longer. Corn is a sure thing. Now Brazil has filled the void and is shipping mega tons of soybeans to China and China wants more. So…the precious rain forest gets turned into soybean fields.
The liberal hate the rain forest!
jbinnout on December 10, 2009 at 1:55 AM
You’d better defend your vote for Abortion!
Abortion is murder.
There are no “moderates” when it comes to this issue.
Self-righteous and judgemental much, dear?
If we’re so low in your opinion, why post here?
Jenfidel on December 10, 2009 at 2:01 AM
Did this woman finally put together a coherent thought? I — one of the most acerbic of her critics — will at least give her credit for that response.
voxpopuli on December 10, 2009 at 2:07 AM
Un-frickin-believable! No matter who they pick to go against the Magnificent Sarah all they manage to do is make her look better.
By they I do mean the Democrat Party AND the repulsive beltway insiders of the Republican Party.
If Sarah doesn’t represent real change then I would love to know who does.
DannoJyd on December 10, 2009 at 2:12 AM
Dude! Try Googling ‘Sarah Palin speech’ if you really want to know who she is. She gave a speech a few months ago in Hong Kong [I think] where she really layed out what America needs right now.
The 0bamaGanda machine won’t report the facts, but with Google it is impossible to hide them all. ;o)
DannoJyd on December 10, 2009 at 2:16 AM
Boy, did the Cuda just shoot Al Gore’s puppy from a helicopter, or what?
Sapwolf on December 10, 2009 at 2:23 AM
Al Gore … an Obama ally … fear mongering on Climate Change.
Obama … it’s Not the GOP fear mongering your policies.
… it’s Gore …. and it’s YOU YOU YOU YOU YOU.
Oblah di Oblah da …….. OblahblahDumsie.
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 3:00 AM
Exactly right, Sap.
The Artic Fox did it again… again … and again.
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 3:02 AM
Arctic Fox, Sap. he he he
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 3:03 AM
He wrote 28 pages? Did I get that right??
Condensed down to something someone had to expand. And he is so confident/nervy, he actually reads OUT LOUD this noxious poem, that will NO DOUBT be read to our kids/grand-kids as part of the public school curriculum…
God HELP us
Ugly on December 10, 2009 at 3:36 AM
You’re the one who comes runnin’ whenever you hear her name.
Jim Treacher on December 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM
Transcribed AlGore Poem:
Good grief.
Ugly on December 10, 2009 at 4:36 AM
Yes, humanity contributes less than 3% of all CO2. Quit changing the subject.
I will restate the topic: Your statement that a single volcano vents more CO2 into the atmosphere than has all of humanity since the industrial revolution is not even CLOSE to being true.
No… when I say “No, a single volcano does NOT release more CO2 than humanity throughout history” it does not logically lead to “Oh yeah, So why hasn’t the world been warming consistently since the Industrial Revolution began, oh Educated One?”. That is called a non sequitur. The “question” only relates to what I said in the uneducated imagination of the questioner. Nothing I said implied anything that might lead to that question.
It is actually quite frightening that so many people here think that that particular question made sense. It’s like you all have some sort of weird flowchart that tells you to recite some line here or there, but that it throws you off when someone agrees with you, but takes issue with the scientific illiteracy that generally plagues skeptic arguments on blog comments.
DaveS on December 10, 2009 at 4:51 AM
From the mouths of babes…
Ugly on December 10, 2009 at 4:57 AM
…? Are you saying there IS a flowchart? Holy crap!
DaveS on December 10, 2009 at 5:13 AM
The volcano example doesn’t matter.
CO2 can’t be separated out from the rest of the atmospheric gases to isolate it as the “culprit” of climate change.
That being said, how much or how little mankind creates isn’t relevant either.
Global warming hasn’t been proven and is in the process of being declared a fraud.
Whether or not “climate change” has been proven to be anything worse than weather and whether or not there’s anything Man can do about it also remains to be proven.
You Greenies need to get over yourselves!
Jenfidel on December 10, 2009 at 5:17 AM
That’s not inherently true for everyone. Depends on how the store handles the event. My store marked our books with our initials on a sticker, so we got our books back we gave.
Enoxo on December 10, 2009 at 5:49 AM
She’s just selling a book, mind you.
I don’t know what it will be like in 2011-2012 when she really decides to RUN!
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 6:22 AM
Pot meet kettle
Thanks for today’s laugh
CWforFreedom on December 10, 2009 at 6:47 AM
More proof Al Gore is insane.
Zorro on December 10, 2009 at 7:04 AM
Great comeback that time. I love it!
I’d love inviting Gore and all the other global-cooling deniers here, but the airport might be closed because of the near-blizzard conditions we’re having right now. They might last all day.
The media are curious about how much money Sarah’s making on her book. I, however, wish they’d investigate how much Gore is making by being so ‘green’. I bet he’s making more than Sarah ever could.
Liam on December 10, 2009 at 7:11 AM
Can see how the artic Ice shelf can melt at the rate it was under the Palin Administration. The warm love and sincerity of ordinary American way of life, must have heated up the atmosphere~ so much that even the polor bears are dieing out to extinction. Gotta feel the Love don’t ya!.. : )
hawkman on December 10, 2009 at 7:27 AM
Sarahcuda, from downtown. Threeeee!
TXUS on December 10, 2009 at 7:28 AM
I think that’s more akin to a duck call than a dog whistle.
ElectricPhase on December 10, 2009 at 7:39 AM
How can Al Gore take this arctic bimbo seriously? 4 crappy colleges in 6 years… Sarah Palin is an idiot.
simplesimon on December 10, 2009 at 7:49 AM
Hang in there. Mommy will have breakfast ready soon.
katy the mean old lady on December 10, 2009 at 7:56 AM
“Vice President Gore, the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that it’s sort of like gravity: you simply can’t deny it.”
4shoes on December 10, 2009 at 8:04 AM
Have to give the Backwoods Barbie credit for that statement…OR MAYBE HER GHOSTWRITER!
PALIN IS A HYPOCRITE! SHE SUPPORTS THE LAW OF THE SEA TREATY WHICH WOULD GIVE OUR SOVEREIGN WATERS TO THE UN AND THE SAME GLOBALIST EUGENICISTS SHE IS BLASTING!
BobAnthony on December 10, 2009 at 8:11 AM
I notice the trolls (particularly AnninCa) only show up when the Libtards are exposed as the losers that they are.
And when some fool starts going off about the evils of CO2, I ask them where they were when photosynthesis was being taught.
red131 on December 10, 2009 at 8:14 AM
The trolls are rather desperate this morning. Palin exposed Al the Pompous Windbag Clown for the moneygrubbing Ellsworth Toohey that he actually has become.
The problem with Gore, and this is something that even Palin is too polite to point out, is that he is too inept to be a good Ayn Rand villain.
victor82 on December 10, 2009 at 8:24 AM
Well … obviously Al Gore took a cue from you. Maybe Al Gore and you are the real bimbos in this case, don’cha ya think?
Eeek!!!!!!!!! Check your logic. It’s idiotic.
TheAlamos on December 10, 2009 at 8:28 AM
This is still you “not responding”, right?
LibTired on December 10, 2009 at 8:31 AM
And you’re first among them, Mr. Gore.
Rosmerta on December 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Um, no. Judgments or conclusions are OPINIONS. They are made on the basis of facts. Gore and the select group of scientists who have formed their “consensus” (another type of OPINION) have discarded or lost inconvenient facts and manipulated others.
Climate, like all natural phenomena, undergoes change constantly. It is hubris to presume that humans can affect or change a complex system like climate.
Flimflam artists such as Gore have created the false narrative of imminent crisis, a problem to be solved, and only he and those like-minded in this wealth transference game have generated a cash-cow to milk until the next “imminent crisis” comes along.
Theories are only opinions. Valid theories are buttressed by verifiable facts.
onlineanalyst on December 10, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Sarah has developed a lovely gift for clear eloquence. AP, I know you’re not a huge fan but I give you credit for letting her have her say here. Between the book (which I’m in the middle of) and her recent statements she’s looking better the more I hear from her.
princetrumpet on December 10, 2009 at 8:57 AM
Funniest thing: Palin’s father taught science classes. I think that it is reasonable to conclude that Sarah Palin gained a lot of solid knowledge through that experience—probably more than Michelle Robinson Obamao learned about competitive sport, sitting on her father’s lap while watching the Olympics.
onlineanalyst on December 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Galileo was a denier too! I’m happy to deny what’s false and accept what’s true. If no money were changing hands I could more readily accept what scientists are saying. If you follow the money in the case of AGW however, it leads to falsified data and wrong “conclusions.” Garbage In Garbage Out.
Mojave Mark on December 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Waaaaaaaaa..the strong woman scares me…..waaaaaa.
Itchee Dryback on December 10, 2009 at 9:04 AM
I can see the Atlantic Ocean from my front porch; But I’ve got it trained to rise and lower twice a day by only 2 feet.
Nobody ever asked me how I do it!
Cybergeezer on December 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM
Why do we never see Al Bore in shorts and a T shirt?
Cybergeezer on December 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM
Um, little tardlett. Al Gore flunked out of law school. Al Gore then flunked out of Divinity school. And, little tardlett? How many majors did Sarah Palin flunk out of, little chumplett?
I also don’t think Palin would be so stupid, as to utter…
The north polar ice cap is melting before our very eyes. It’s been the size of the continental United States for most of the last three million years, and now suddenly 40 percent of it is gone and the rest of it is expected to disappear within with five, 10, 15 years.
Hmmm, Mann wiped out the MWP, Gore wipes out all ice ages. But, hey, it’s not like Charles Johnson wouldn’t lap that up, if his favorite PR guy told him it was so, nor any other Obama voter.
I wonder if Sarah Palin can tell the difference between a “majority” and 3%? We know Al Gore can’t. We know Obama voters can’t. We certainly know the simplelittletardletts that infect these boards, can’t.
And last, but not least
Al Gore is too much of a pu$$y to ever debate somebody, on his religion of AGW. I wonder if Palin is such a coward, as your typical simple little Democrat?
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/17/al-gore-got-d-natural-sciences-harvard
heh. Of course, anything above an F would make Gore an giant, among his Journalism and Poly Sci major friends.
MNHawk on December 10, 2009 at 9:21 AM
That poem’s hilarious. Just begging for the Iowahawk “treatment,” IMO.
cs89 on December 10, 2009 at 9:23 AM
Looks like I’m way late for this party, but I just wanted to say…
…PWNED!!!
Dongemaharu on December 10, 2009 at 9:24 AM
Chris Matthews,
“I wish that stupid quitter would shut up and go away!”
Olberdork,
” Damn Chris she’s not quitin she’s reloadin, duck man, duck!
With a facebook post she singlehandledley stopped Pinnochios’ HealthScare Scamdal and now in about two paragraphs makes that damn idiot AlGores Global baloney look like ah like ah, natural causes, and AlBore look like an idiot!”
God I Love That Woman!
One book on the table a signed one on the way and I think I’ll buy two more for my Minnesoota libtard sisters for Xmas. Perfect libtard Christmas gift a book by Sarah.
Ha drivin sales to 52 million!
dhunter on December 10, 2009 at 9:31 AM
Darling, you really will have a hard time when she is president, so don’t get all wee-weed up too early, it’s really not good for you fragile psyche
runner on December 10, 2009 at 9:32 AM
They left their diesel trucks running in Billings, Mt, on Tuesday morning, and took turns staying in line and warming in the trucks. Not enough global warming there I guess. Not much on the west side either.
Kissmygrits on December 10, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Psst. Simpletard. Don’t tell Al Gore about this. Nor Andrea Mitchell, nor any of the other of the finest examples our Journalism and Communications skools have to offer.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/hockey-stick-observed-in-noaa-ice-core-data/#more-13939
I haven’t seen so many hockey sticks on display, since that Red Light District special in Copenhagen.
MNHawk on December 10, 2009 at 9:41 AM
The other scam is that oil is a finite resource when in fact a body of scientists exist that think the heat of the interior of the earth is constantly breaking down dirt, rock and plant debris and converting it into oil!
Thus the no drill nowhere is just a libtards wetdream to make us all poor and beholdin to the leftist scumbags!
Would someone grab that and drive the libtards batsh.. crazy with it?
dhunter on December 10, 2009 at 9:44 AM
I wonder if the trolls are the same people gore fired from his failed TV network?
lonestar1 on December 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Hey, simpletard, crr0, any other of the cookie cutter tards out there.
Think Al Gore is smarter than a 6th grader? Maybe the little green mediamattersb!tch is smarter than a 6th grader? Surely the PR flack, hired by (unknown, as the registration of desmogblog is hidden behind an anonymous service) that’s all the rage of Chucky, Moonbiot, and the rest of the tards, is smarter than a 6th grader, right?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/picking-out-the-uhi-in-global-temperature-records-so-easy-a-6th-grader-can-do-it/
I don’t think so, either.
MNHawk on December 10, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Cybergeezer on December 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM
Why? OMG the thoughts of such an image is enough to make me lose my breakfast.
On second thought, maybe the supposed cannibalizing polar bears might eat him!
red131 on December 10, 2009 at 9:55 AM
I love this woman.
Wonder if all the libbies regret driving her from office in Alaska. Had they left her alone, we wouldn’t hear from Sarah much, as she’d be busy governing her beautiful state.
But no, the libbies aren’t that smart. And for that I’m grateful.
Go get ‘em, Sarah!
NebCon on December 10, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Troll response is even more pathetic than usual today. As someone way upthread already said, when their response is along the lines of “she’s too dumb to write this stuff” then you know it was a direct hit.
Missy on December 10, 2009 at 9:58 AM
Liberals have never understood the concept of unintended consequences. Fortunately, this time, it has worked in our favor.
pugwriter on December 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Just consider me a noisy Independent who could be a voter for conservatives, unless you guys make me too nuts.
I’m done with the big divides, personally.
AnninCA on December 9, 2009 at 11:05 PM
Oh my God, girl, get over yourself.
NJ Red on December 10, 2009 at 10:42 AM
I thought that was the Iowahawk treatment. Holy crap! And I do mean crap.
Lily on December 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM
And at the buzzer, THE CUDA PUTS THREE MORE ON THE BOARD!!!
Blacksmith8 on December 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Met Office, which has spent four days collecting signatures. The initiative is a sign of how worried it is that e-mails stolen from the University of East Anglia are fueling skepticism about man-made global warming at a critical moment in talks on carbon emissions.
One scientist said that he felt under pressure to sign the circular or risk losing work. The Met Office admitted that many of the signatories did not work on climate change..
MEANWHILE GEARING UP FOR THE PRESIDENT’S TRIP TO HOPENHAGEN OR CARBONHAGEN, THERE APPEARS TO BE A MARKETING CAMPAIGN UNDERWAY
“It’s The Marketing Stupid”
Mary Matalin Called Global Warming “A Money Scam” This Morning On Imus In The Morning.
Dr Evil on December 10, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Sarah Strikes Again – SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey Al, If ya can’t run with the big dogs- STAY ON THE PORCH!
huskerdiva on December 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM
I remember when AnninCA was on Taylor Marsh, NQ and Hillbuzz, pulling the same act late in the primaries. She is an Obama supporter. So are her friends MeatheadinCA, Laura in Maryland, etc. They’re astroturfers. Just observe them. I have for well over a year now.
alliebobbitt on December 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Did you catch the tone of that NYT piece? It was condescending and dismissive of AGW critics. Typical of that worthless rag. Obviously, to the NYT, the consensus of idiots, liars and frauds equals science.
SKYFOX on December 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Then I guess AnninCa is utterly worthless then,
Holger on December 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM
We should get a pool going every year to see which paper prints “This may be the year polar ice diseapears!” first.
We heard it this year and last year.
jhffmn on December 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Don’t just take my word for it. Search her name. You’ll notice on healthcare threads, she usually has back-up now, because they are trying to give her the appearance of validity.
alliebobbitt on December 10, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4